Clinical characteristics and management of olecranon and prepatellar septic bursitis in a multicentre study

Orthopedic Articular and Periarticular Joint Infections

Acute nontraumatic joint pain has an extensive differential. Emergency physicians must be adept at identifying limb and potentially life-threatening infection. Chief among these is septic arthritis. In addition to knowing how these joint infections typically present, clinicians need to be aware of host and pathogen factors that can lead to more insidious presentations and how these factors impact the interpretation of diagnostic tests.

2023 French recommendations for diagnosing and managing prepatellar and olecranon septic bursitis

Septic bursitis (SB) is a common condition accounting for one third of all cases of inflammatory bursitis. It is often related to professional activities. Management is heterogeneous and either ambulatory or hospital-based, with no recommendations available. This article presents recommendations for managing patients with septic bursitis gathered by 18 rheumatologists from the French Society for Rheumatology work group on bone and joint infections, 1 infectious diseases specialist, 2 orthopedic surgeons, 1 general practitioner and 1 emergency physician. This group used a literature review and expert opinions to establish 3 general principles and 11 recommendations for managing olecranon and prepatellar SB. The French Health authority (Haute Autorité de santé [HAS]) methodology was used for these recommendations. Designed for rheumatologists, general practitioners, emergency physicians and orthopedic surgeons, they focus on the use of biological tests and imaging in both outpatient and inpatient management. Antibiotic treatment options (drugs and duration) are proposed for both treatment modalities. Finally, surgical indications, non-drug treatments and prevention are covered by specific recommendations.

Clinical Outcomes Following Open Olecranon Bursa Excision for Septic and Aseptic Olecranon Bursitis: An Observational Study

Background and objective Olecranon bursitis (aseptic or septic) is caused by inflammation in the bursal tissue. While it is typically managed with conservative measures, refractory cases may indicate surgical intervention. There is currently limited research about outcomes following bursal excision for both septic and aseptic etiologies. In light of this, the purpose of this study was to determine if patients experienced improvement following surgical olecranon bursa excision and to compare outcomes between septic and aseptic forms. Materials and methods A retrospective review was performed involving patients who underwent olecranon bursa excision from 2014 to 2021. Demographic data, patient characteristics, surgical data, and outcome-related data were collected from the medical records. Patients were classified into subgroups based on the type of olecranon bursitis (septic or aseptic). Preoperative and one-year postoperative 12-item short-form survey (SF-12) results and range of motion (ROM) outcomes were evaluated for the entire cohort as well as the subgroups. Results We included 61 patients in our study and found significant improvement in the Physical Component Scale 12 (PCS-12) score for all patients (42.0 vs. 45.5, p=0.010) following surgery. However, based on subgroup analysis, the aseptic group improved in PCS-12 following surgery (41.5 vs. 46.8, p<0.001), but the septic group did not (43.6 vs. 40.5, p=0.277). No improvements were found in the Mental Component Scale 12 (MCS-12) scores following surgery in either group. Eighteen of the 61 patients experienced postoperative complications (29.5%), but only 6.5% required a second surgical procedure. Specifically, 14 of the 18 complications occurred in the aseptic group while two septic and two aseptic patients required additional surgeries. Elbow ROM did not change significantly after surgery but more patients were found to have full ROM postoperatively (83.0% to 91.8%, p=0.228). Conclusion Our findings suggest that patients with refractory olecranon bursitis, particularly if aseptic, tend to gain significant physical health benefits from open bursectomy.

Septic Olecranon Bursitis With Osteomyelitis Attributed to Cutibacterium acnes: Case Report and Literature Overview of the Dilemma of Potential Contaminants and False-Positives

We report an unusual case of acute septic olecranon bursitis, with probable olecranon osteomyelitis, where the only organism isolated in culture was initially considered a contaminant, Cutibacterium acnes. However, we ultimately considered it the likely causal organism when treatment for most of the other more likely organisms failed. This typically indolent organism is prevalent in pilosebaceous glands, which are scarce in the posterior elbow region. This case illustrates the often challenging empirical management of a musculoskeletal infection when the only organism isolated might be a contaminant, but successful eradication requires continued treatment as if it is the causal organism. The patient is a Caucasian 53-year-old male who presented to our clinic with a second episode of septic bursitis at the same location. Four years prior, he had septic olecranon bursitis from methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus that was treated uneventfully with one surgical debridement and a one-week course of antibiotics. In the current episode reported here, he sustained a minor abrasion. Cultures were obtained five separate times because of no growth and difficulty eradicating the infection. One culture grew C. acnes on day 21 of incubation; this long duration has been reported. The first several weeks of antibiotic treatment failed to eradicate the infection, which we ultimately attributed to inadequate treatment of C. acnes osteomyelitis. Although C. acnes has a well-known propensity for false-positive cultures as typically reported in post-operative shoulder infections, treatment for our patient's olecranon bursitis/osteomyelitis was successful only after several surgical debridements and a prolonged course of intravenous and oral antibiotics that targeted it as the presumptive causal organism. However, it was possible that C. acnes was a contaminant/superinfection, and another organism was the culprit, such as a Streptococcus or Mycobacterium species that was eradicated by the treatment regime targeted for C. acnes.