1
|
Leone S, Pezone I, Pisaturo M, McCaffery E, Alfieri A, Fiore M. Pharmacotherapies for multidrug-resistant gram-positive infections: current options and beyond. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2024; 25:1027-1037. [PMID: 38863433 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2024.2367003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) are a serious concern for public health with high morbidity and mortality. Though many antibiotics have been introduced to manage these infections, there are remaining concerns regarding the optimal management of Gram-positive MDROs. AREAS COVERED A literature search on the PubMed/Medline database was conducted. We applied no language and time limits for the search strategy. In this narrative review, we discuss the current options for managing Gram-positive MDROs as well as non-traditional antibacterial agents in development. EXPERT OPINION Despite their introduction more than 70 years ago, glycopeptides are still the cornerstone in treating Gram-positive infections: all registrative studies of new antibiotics have glycopeptides as control; these studies are designed as not inferior studies, therefore it is almost impossible to give recommendations other than the use of glycopeptides in the treatment of Gram-positive infections. The best evidence on treatments different from glycopeptides comes from post-hoc analysis and meta-analysis. Non-traditional antibacterial agents are being studied to aid in short and effective antibiotic therapies. The use of non-traditional antibacterial agents is not restricted to replacing traditional antibacterial agents with alternative therapies; instead, they should be used in combination with antibiotic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiano Leone
- Division of Infectious Diseases, "San Giuseppe Moscati" Hospital, Avellino, Italy
| | - Ilaria Pezone
- Department of Pediatrics, "San Giuseppe Moscati" Hospital, Aversa CE, Italy
| | - Mariantonietta Pisaturo
- Department of Mental Health and Public Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Eleni McCaffery
- Department of Emergency Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Aniello Alfieri
- Department of Elective Surgery, Postoperative Intensive Care Unit and Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy, A.O.R.N. Antonio Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Fiore
- Department of Women, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martin L, Pecar A, Baltaci Y, Simon A, Kohl S, Müller D, Forster J. [Potential Nephrotoxicity of Combination of Vancomycin and Piperacillin-Tazobactam: Recommendations from the AG ABS of the DGPI supported by experts of the GPN]. KLINISCHE PADIATRIE 2024. [PMID: 38458232 DOI: 10.1055/a-2244-7698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
The combination of vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam (V+P/T) is used for empirical antibiotic treatment of severe infections, especially in immunocompromised patients and those colonized with multidrug-resistant bacteria. Nephrotoxicity is a frequently observed adverse effect of vancomycin. Its risk can be reduced by therapeutic drug monitoring and adjusted dosing. Piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T) rarely causes interstitial nephritis. The results of retrospective cohort studies in children predominantly show a low, clinically irrelevant, additive nephrotoxicity (defined as an increase in creatinine in the serum) of both substances. Due to the limitations of the existing publications, the ABS working group of the DGPI and experts of the GPN do not recommend against the use of P/T plus vancomycin. Preclinical studies and a prospective study with adult patients, which evaluated different renal function tests as well as clinical outcomes, do not support previous findings of additive nephrotoxicity. Time-restricted use of V+P/T can minimize exposure and the potential risk of nephrotoxicity. Local guidelines, developed in collaboration with the antibiotic stewardship team, should define the indications for empirical and targeted use of P/T and V+P/T. When using combination therapy with V+P/T, kidney function should be monitored through clinical parameters (volume status, balancing, blood pressure) as well as additional laboratory tests such as serum creatinine and cystatin C.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luise Martin
- Klinik für Pädiatrie m.S. Pneumologie, Immunologie und Intensivmedizin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alenka Pecar
- Kinderklinik und Kinderpoliklinik im Dr. von Haunerschen Kinderspital, Klinikum der Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Yeliz Baltaci
- Klinik für Pädiatrische Onkologie und Hämatologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes und Medizinische Fakultät der Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Arne Simon
- Klinik für Pädiatrische Onkologie und Hämatologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes und Medizinische Fakultät der Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Kohl
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Abteilung für Kindernephrologie, Uniklinik Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Dominik Müller
- Klinik für Pädiatrie m. S. Gastroenterologie, Nephrologie und Stoffwechselmedizin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johannes Forster
- Institut für Hygiene und Mikrobiologie, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang MM, Stevens RW, Adema JL, Mara KC, Schuetz AN, Tande AJ, Rivera CG. A Pharmacovigilance Analysis of Daptomycin Use Based on CLSI Susceptible Dose-Dependent Category. Infect Dis Ther 2023; 12:2295-2305. [PMID: 37751018 PMCID: PMC10581971 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-023-00868-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Daptomycin doses 8-12 mg/kg are recommended for susceptible dose-dependent Enterococcus species. However, data remain limited on safety outcomes of such dosing, compared to standard 4-6 mg/kg dosing. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, patients were stratified into daptomycin standard-dose (≤ 6.5 mg/kg) versus high-dose (≥ 7.5 mg/kg) groups. The primary outcome was daptomycin safety based on a composite of creatine kinase elevation, daptomycin-related peripheral blood eosinophilia, eosinophilic pneumonitis, alanine aminotransferase elevation, and alkaline phosphatase elevation. A secondary aim was to identify risk factors for daptomycin adverse effects. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years old, daptomycin receipt for ≥ 48 h, and Enterococcus cultures with a daptomycin minimal inhibitory concentration 2-4 mg/L. RESULTS A total of 119 patients were included for analysis. Median daptomycin doses were 6.0 mg/kg (IQR 5.4, 6.1) and 8.1 mg/kg (IQR 7.9, 9.6) in the standard- and high-dose cohorts, respectively. Median durations were 13.5 days (standard-dose) and 16 days (high-dose) (p = 0.02). The composite safety endpoint occurred in 32.0% of the standard-dose group and 32.5% of the high-dose group (p = 0.96). Daptomycin was dose-reduced or held in 8.1% of patients experiencing an adverse effect. Concurrent antihistamine usage was associated with the composite outcome; however, there was no association with daptomycin dose or concurrent statin use. CONCLUSION High-dose daptomycin was not associated with increased laboratory abnormalities or adverse drug reactions compared to standard-dose daptomycin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming M Zhang
- Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Ryan W Stevens
- Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Jennifer L Adema
- Department of Pharmacy, East Carolina University Health Medical Center, 2100 Stantonsburg Rd., Greenville, NC, 27834, USA
| | - Kristin C Mara
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Audrey N Schuetz
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Aaron J Tande
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Christina G Rivera
- Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cairns KA, Udy AA, Peel TN, Abbott IJ, Dooley MJ, Peleg AY. Therapeutics for Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcal Bloodstream Infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 2023; 36:e0005922. [PMID: 37067406 PMCID: PMC10283489 DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00059-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are common causes of bloodstream infections (BSIs) with high morbidity and mortality rates. They are pathogens of global concern with a limited treatment pipeline. Significant challenges exist in the management of VRE BSI, including drug dosing, the emergence of resistance, and the optimal treatment for persistent bacteremia and infective endocarditis. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for antimicrobial therapy is evolving for VRE-active agents; however, there are significant gaps in the literature for predicting antimicrobial efficacy for VRE BSIs. To date, TDM has the greatest evidence for predicting drug toxicity for the three main VRE-active antimicrobial agents daptomycin, linezolid, and teicoplanin. This article presents an overview of the treatment options for VRE BSIs, the role of antimicrobial dose optimization through TDM in supporting clinical infection management, and challenges and perspectives for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly A. Cairns
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Pharmacy Department, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew A. Udy
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Trisha N. Peel
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Iain J. Abbott
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Microbiology Unit, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael J. Dooley
- Pharmacy Department, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Medicines Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anton Y. Peleg
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Infection Program, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Centre to Impact AMR, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
White BP, Barber KE, Chastain DB. Treatment decisions in VRE bacteraemia: a survey of infectious diseases pharmacists. JAC Antimicrob Resist 2023; 5:dlad063. [PMID: 37223393 PMCID: PMC10202426 DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlad063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background VRE infections increased in 2020. High-dose daptomycin (≥10 mg/kg) has shown mortality benefit over other regimens, though daptomycin resistance is increasing. Limited data exist on the practice patterns of ID pharmacists for VRE bloodstream infections (VRE BSIs). Objectives To describe practice patterns for VRE BSI in ID pharmacists. Methods A 22-question REDCap survey was distributed to ID pharmacist members of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) Infectious Diseases Practice and Research Network (ID PRN) via e-mail listserv. The survey was distributed on 7 April 2022 and remained open for 4 weeks. Results Sixty-eight pharmacists responded. All pharmacists completed additional training or certification in infectious diseases past their PharmD, and most (70.5%) had been practising for 10 years or less. Pharmacists at academic medical centres (80.0%) were more likely (P = 0.001) to have implemented the updated CLSI breakpoints than pharmacists at other types of institutions (55.2%). Daptomycin was the preferred drug for VRE BSI (92.6%), with 10 mg/kg (72.1%) being the preferred dose. Adjusted body weight was the most common weight (61.2%) used for obese patients. Fourteen days (76.1%) was the most common treatment duration for VRE BSI. Pharmacists defined persistent VRE BSI as 5 days (68.7%) after first blood culture. Conclusions ID pharmacists overwhelmingly selected high-dose daptomycin for VRE BSI. There were variations in practice and response rate when selecting combination therapy, managing persistent bacteraemia, and treating patients with high daptomycin MICs or previous exposure to daptomycin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Katie E Barber
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Mississippi College of Pharmacy, 2500 North State Street, USA
| | - Daniel B Chastain
- Department of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, 1000 Jefferson Street, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wenzler E, Maximos M, Asempa TE, Biehle L, Schuetz AN, Hirsch EB. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing: An updated primer for clinicians in the era of antimicrobial resistance: Insights from the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Pharmacotherapy 2023; 43:264-278. [PMID: 36825480 DOI: 10.1002/phar.2781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is a critical function of the clinical microbiology laboratory and is essential for optimizing care of patients with infectious diseases, monitoring antimicrobial resistance (AMR) trends, and informing public health initiatives. Several methods are available for performing AST including broth microdilution, agar dilution, and disk diffusion. Technological advances such as the development of commercial automated susceptibility testing platforms and the advent of rapid diagnostic tests have improved the rapidity, robustness, and clinical application of AST. Numerous accrediting and regulatory agencies are involved in the process of AST and setting and revising breakpoints, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Challenges to optimizing AST include the emergence of new resistance mechanisms, the development of new antimicrobial agents, and generation of new data requiring updates and revisions to established methods and breakpoints. Together, the challenges in AST methods and their interpretation create important opportunities for well-informed clinicians to improve patient outcomes and provide value to antimicrobial stewardship programs, especially in the setting of rapidly changing and increasing AMR. Addressing AST challenges will involve continued development of new technologies along with collaboration between clinicians and the laboratory to facilitate optimal antimicrobial use, combat the increasing burden of AMR, and inform the development of novel antimicrobials. This updated primer serves to reinforce important principles of AST, and to provide guidance on their implementation and optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Wenzler
- College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mira Maximos
- School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada.,Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tomefa E Asempa
- Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| | - Lauren Biehle
- School of Pharmacy, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, USA
| | - Audrey N Schuetz
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Elizabeth B Hirsch
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tseng TC, Chuang YC, Yang JL, Lin CY, Huang SH, Wang JT, Chen YC, Chang SC. The Combination of Daptomycin with Fosfomycin is More Effective than Daptomycin Alone in Reducing Mortality of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcal Bloodstream Infections: A Retrospective, Comparative Cohort Study. Infect Dis Ther 2023; 12:589-606. [PMID: 36629997 PMCID: PMC9925660 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-022-00754-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION High-dose daptomycin-based combinations are recommended for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) bloodstream infection (BSI). Preclinical data have shown a synergistic effect of daptomycin/fosfomycin combinations against VRE. However, clinical studies comparing daptomycin monotherapy with daptomycin/fosfomycin combinations are unavailable. METHODS An observational study of VRE-BSI was performed between 2010-2021 on patients receiving daptomycin monotherapy (≥ 8 mg/kg) or daptomycin combined with intravenous fosfomycin. Patients treated with concomitant β-lactam combinations were excluded. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression and augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW) analyses. RESULTS Among 224 patients, 176 received daptomycin monotherapy, and 48 received fosfomycin combinations. The median daptomycin and fosfomycin doses were 9.8 mg/kg and 12 g/day, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 77.3% and 47.9% in the daptomycin monotherapy and fosfomycin combination groups (P < 0.001), respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis predicted lower mortality with fosfomycin combination treatment (adjusted odds ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.17-0.73; P = 0.005). AIPW demonstrated a 17.8% reduced mortality with fosfomycin combinations (95% CI, - 30.6- - 4.9%; P = 0.007). The survival benefit was significant, especially among patients with a lower Pitt bacteremia score or fosfomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≤ 64 mg/l. Fosfomycin combination resulted in higher hypernatremia (10.4% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.04) and hypokalemia (33.3% vs. 15.3%, P = 0.009) compared to daptomycin monotherapy. CONCLUSION The combination of high-dose daptomycin with fosfomycin improved the survival rate of patients with VRE-BSI compared to daptomycin alone. The benefit of the combination was most pronounced for VRE with fosfomycin MIC ≤ 64 mg/l and for patients with a low Pitt bacteremia score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tai-Chung Tseng
- Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Chung Chuang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.
| | - Jia-Ling Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 100, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Ying Lin
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Yun-Lin Branch, Yun-Lin, Taiwan
| | - Sung-Hsi Huang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan
| | - Jann-Tay Wang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 100, Taiwan
| | - Yee-Chun Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 100, Taiwan
| | - Shan-Chwen Chang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 100, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
The combination of daptomycin with β-lactam antibiotics is more effective than daptomycin alone for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infection. J Infect Public Health 2022; 15:1396-1402. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
|