Fulminant hepatic failure after the start of an efavirenz-based HAART regimen in a treatment-naive female AIDS patient without hepatitis virus co-infection

Hepatotoxicity and Liver-Related Mortality in Women of Childbearing Potential Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus and High CD4 Cell Counts Initiating Efavirenz-Containing Regimens

BACKGROUND

Severe hepatotoxicity in people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) receiving efavirenz (EFV) has been reported. We assessed the incidence and risk factors of hepatotoxicity in women of childbearing age initiating EFV-containing regimens.

METHODS

In the Promoting Maternal and Infant Survival Everywhere (PROMISE) trial, ART-naive pregnant women with HIV and CD4 count ≥ 350 cells/μL and alanine aminotransferase ≤ 2.5 the upper limit of normal were randomized during the antepartum and postpartum periods to antiretroviral therapy (ART) strategies to assess HIV vertical transmission, safety, and maternal disease progression. Hepatotoxicity was defined per the Division of AIDS Toxicity Tables. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed with covariates including participant characteristics, ART regimens, and timing of EFV initiation.

RESULTS

Among 3576 women, 2435 (68%) initiated EFV at a median 121.1 weeks post delivery. After EFV initiation, 2.5% (61/2435) had severe (grade 3 or higher) hepatotoxicity with an incidence of 2.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-2.6) per 100 person-years. Events occurred between 1 and 132 weeks postpartum. Of those with severe hepatotoxicity, 8.2% (5/61) were symptomatic, and 3.3% (2/61) of those with severe hepatotoxicity died from EFV-related hepatotoxicity, 1 of whom was symptomatic. The incidence of liver-related mortality was 0.07 (95% CI, .06-.08) per 100 person-years. In multivariable analysis, older age was associated with severe hepatotoxicity (adjusted hazard ratio per 5 years, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.06-1.70]).

CONCLUSIONS

Severe hepatotoxicity after EFV initiation occurred in 2.5% of women and liver-related mortality occurred in 3% of those with severe hepatotoxicity. The occurrence of fatal events underscores the need for safer treatments for women of childbearing age.

Hepatotoxicity of Contemporary Antiretroviral Drugs: A Review and Evaluation of Published Clinical Data

Contemporary antiretroviral agents afford enhanced potency and safety for patients living with HIV. Newer antiretroviral drugs are often better tolerated than those initially approved in the early stages of the HIV epidemic. While the safety profile has improved, adverse drug reactions still occur. We have segregated the antiretroviral agents used in contemporary practice into class groupings based on their mechanism of antiviral activity (non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, integrase inhibitors, protease inhibitors, and entry inhibitors) while providing a review and discussion of the hepatoxicity seen in the most relevant clinical literature published to date. Clinical literature for individual agents is discussed and agent comparisons afforded within each group in tabular format. Our review will provide a summative overview of the incidence and medications associated with hepatic adverse reactions linked to the use of contemporary antiretroviral drugs.

Severe hepatotoxicity induced by efavirenz in a treatment-naïve, low body mass index HIV-infected, female patient with no hepatitis and other virus co-infections

Combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) consisting of two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and one non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), such as efavirenz, is still the first-line treatment in resource-limited settings. However, efavirenz has shown strong prominence of disadvantages with variance in plasma concentration and central nervous side effects. Our study presents HIV infected, drug naïve, female patient with relatively low BMI, CYP2B6 516G>T (rs3745274) genotype with high efavirenz plasma concentration. In this case report, the patient was admitted at the hospital 6 months after cART initiation with drug-induced severe hepatotoxicity. Furthermore, pathophysiological findings proved confluent parenchymal necrosis after aspiration liver biopsy, with mild to moderate inflammation in portal tracts with focal interface hepatitis. All other possible causes were excluded. Thus, we conclude that efavirenz has a potential harmful effect in patients with low BMI, specific genotyping and interindividual pharmacokinetics affecting high plasma concentration.

Acute Liver Failure among Patients on Efavirenz-Based Antiretroviral Therapy

Objectives

To describe the clinical characteristics of patients presenting with fulminant liver failure after varying periods of exposure to Efavirenz containing antiretroviral medications.

Methods

We report a series of 4 patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection who were admitted with acute liver failure (ALF) over a 6-month period. All these patients had been treated with a range of Efavirenz containing antiretroviral regimens and were negative for hepatitis A, B, and C infections as well as other opportunistic infections, all were negative for autoimmune hepatitis, and none had evidence of chronic liver disease or use of alcohol or herbal medications. Information on patient clinical characteristics, current antiretroviral regimen, CD4 count, HIV-1 RNA levels, and clinical chemistry parameters was collected. Informed consent was provided.

Results

During a 6-month period, four patients without other known risk factors for acute hepatitis presented with symptomatic drug-induced liver injury with varying symptoms and outcomes. The pattern of liver injury was hepatocellular for all the 4 cases. Liver biopsies were done for all the four cases and the results showed a heavy mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate with eosinophils. For three patients withdrawal of Efavirenz from their antiretroviral regimen was sufficient to restore transaminase levels to normal and led to improvement of clinical symptoms. For one patient his clinical course was characterized by fulminant liver failure and fluctuating episodes of hepatic encephalopathy which ultimately resulted in his death.

Conclusion

Hepatotoxicity of Efavirenz is not as rare as previously described in the literature and does actually present with fatal outcomes. The key message to note is that frequent monitoring of liver enzymes should be done at initiation of antiretroviral therapy and should continue throughout the treatment period.

Role of Cytochrome P450 2B6 Pharmacogenomics in Determining Efavirenz-Mediated Central Nervous System Toxicity, Treatment Outcomes, and Dosage Adjustments in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection

For treatment-naive patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection, efavirenz (EFV), together with tenofovir and emtricitabine, was once widely prescribed given its efficacy and ease of administration in a combination pill. However, the high rate of central nervous system (CNS) toxicities from EFV prompted the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to move the EFV-based regimen from the recommended to the alternative category. For patients who do meet the criteria for newer recommended antiretroviral treatments, EFV is a viable option and often the mainstay of treatment outside the United States because newer antiretroviral treatments are more expensive. CNS toxicity occurring with the recommended standard dose of EFV remains a challenge and may in part be attributable to polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2B6, the enzyme involved in the major metabolic pathway for converting EFV to inactive metabolites. Functionally deficient alleles of CYP2B6 such as CYP2B6*6, *18, and *22 may be responsible for significantly higher therapeutic concentrations of EFV at a standard dose of 600 mg/day. We conducted a thorough review of the reported studies to elucidate the relationship between polymorphisms in CYP2B6 with adverse events and treatment response, including virologic suppression, immunologic response, resistance, and discontinuation of treatment. Compelling evidence exists to support the case for CYP2B6 genotype-guided EFV therapy while acknowledging the need for prospective controlled clinical trials to evaluate its clinical utility.

Dual antiviral therapy for HIV and hepatitis C - drug interactions and side effects

INTRODUCTION

Roughly 20% of HIV-positive persons worldwide are coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). The recent advent of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) that cure most hepatitis C patients has attracted much attention. Knowledge on drug interactions between DAA and antiretrovirals (ARV) may allow maximizing antiviral efficacy while minimizing drug-related toxicities.

AREAS COVERED

We review the most frequent side effects and clinically significant drug interactions between DAA and ARV. We further discuss how they can be prevented and managed in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients.

EXPERT OPINION

The safety profile of current DAA and the most recently approved ARV is quite favorable. Interactions between DAA and ARV could be frequent in clinical practice. The most common drug interactions affect drug metabolism by inducing or inhibiting the cytochrome P450 system, leading to abnormal drug exposures. Throughout this mechanism HCV and HIV protease inhibitors interact, especially when co-formulated with ritonavir as a pharmacoenhancer, and non-nucleoside HCV and HIV polymerase inhibitors. In contrast, HIV and HCV nucleos(t)ide polymerase inhibitors, and most HCV NS5A inhibitors (i.e., ledipasvir) and HIV integrase inhibitors (i.e., dolutegravir), do not or only marginally affect CYP450, and therefore are free of significant drug interactions. Exposure to HIV and HCV nucleos(t)ide analogues (i.e., tenofovir and sofosbuvir, respectively) is subject to induction/inhibition of drug transporters (i.e., P-glycoprotein).

Liver transplantation for acute liver failure due to efavirenz hepatotoxicity: the importance of routine monitoring

We present the first case report in the UK of acute liver failure caused by efavirenz therapy culminating in liver transplantation. A 26-year-old Zimbabwean woman commenced emtricitabine, tenofovir and efavirenz (Atripla) in December 2011. Her liver function tests at baseline and at 20 days after initiating antiretroviral therapy were normal. At three months of therapy her blood tests haemolysed and were not processed. She had previously missed follow-up appointments and on this occasion failed to return for repeat tests. She was not seen again until after six months of antiretroviral therapy when she presented to her general practitioner with acute liver failure. Her condition deteriorated and she required liver transplantation. She recovered well and re-started antiretroviral therapy to good effect. The case illustrates the value of routine monitoring after initiating antiretroviral therapy and the fundamental importance of engaging patients in long-term management to ensure safe treatment.

Liver enzyme abnormalities and associated risk factors in HIV patients on efavirenz-based HAART with or without tuberculosis co-infection in Tanzania

Objectives

To investigate the timing, incidence, clinical presentation, pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetic predictors for antiretroviral and anti-tuberculosis drug induced liver injury (DILI) in HIV patients with or without TB co-infection.

Methods and Findings

A total of 473 treatment naïve HIV patients (253 HIV only and 220 with HIV-TB co-infection) were enrolled prospectively. Plasma efavirenz concentration and CYP2B6*6, CYP3A5*3, *6 and *7, ABCB1 3435C/T and SLCO1B1 genotypes were determined. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected at baseline and up to 48 weeks of antiretroviral therapy. DILI case definition was according to Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). Incidence of DILI and identification of predictors was evaluated using Cox Proportional Hazards Model. The overall incidence of DILI was 7.8% (8.3 per 1000 person-week), being non-significantly higher among patients receiving concomitant anti-TB and HAART (10.0%, 10.7per 1000 person-week) than those receiving HAART alone (5.9%, 6.3 per 1000 person-week). Frequency of CYP2B6*6 allele (p = 0.03) and CYP2B6*6/*6 genotype (p = 0.06) was significantly higher in patients with DILI than those without. Multivariate cox regression model indicated that CYP2B6*6/*6 genotype and anti-HCV IgG antibody positive as significant predictors of DILI. Median time to DILI was 2 weeks after HAART initiation and no DILI onset was observed after 12 weeks. No severe DILI was seen and the gain in CD4 was similar in patients with or without DILI.

Conclusions

Antiretroviral and anti-tuberculosis DILI does occur in our setting, presenting early following HAART initiation. DILI seen is mild, transient and may not require treatment interruption. There is good tolerance to HAART and anti-TB with similar immunological outcomes. Genetic make-up mainly CYP2B6 genotype influences the development of efavirenz based HAART liver injury in Tanzanians.

Fatal cumulative toxicities of HAART in a stable, AIDS-free, HIV-infected patient

The authors describe the case of fatal cumulative toxicities in a 58-year-old AIDS-free, HIV-infected patient, who successively developed under highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART): severe lipodystrophy, complicated osteoporosis, complicated non-cirrhotic portal hypertension of the liver (with ascites, portal thrombosis, oesophageal varices and protein-losing enteropathy) due to nodular regenerative hyperplasia. These cumulative HAART-related toxicities led to death, despite symptomatic treatment and the switch of antiretrovirals (especially didanosine) putatively involved in the process in these drug-mediated diseases. As morbidity and mortality in HIV infection continue to improve, it appears important to recognise such rare HAART-associated toxicities. This case illustrates the absolute necessity of investigating the long-term side effects of HAART in HIV infection, particularly in patients treated with first generation molecules. The switch strategy (switching old molecules to newer ones) is crucial in case of severe suspected toxicity and has to be discussed in asymptomatic patients largely exposed to first generation molecules, in order to prevent long-term toxicity.

Efavirenz-Induced Hypersensitivity Reaction Manifesting in Rash and Hepatitis in a Latino Male

Objective:

To report a case of hypersensitivity manifesting in a rash, fever, and life-threatening hepatitis in a patient initiated on efavirenz therapy.

Case Summary:

A 30-year-old Latino male newly diagnosed with HIV was started on efavirenz-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) using tenofovir 300 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and efavirenz 600 mg once daily. Eleven days after beginning therapy, he developed a hypersensitivity reaction manifesting in rash and fever preceding severe drug-induced hepatitis. Liver enzyme peak values were aspartate transaminase 3410 U/L and alanine transaminase 2132 U/L. Hepatitis resolved with discontinuation of the HAART. The patient was rechallenged with tenofovir and emtricitabine one year later; no adverse reactions occurred.

Discussion:

The Naranjo probability scale demonstrated a probable relationship between this adverse reaction and efavirenz. A MEDLINE search (2004 to September 2007) revealed 2 cases of rash preceding hepatitis with the initiation of efavirenz. Both cases were in women; there were no prior reported cases of efavirenz hypersensitivity in men. Although the mechanism of this reaction is unknown, a few factors may have contributed to this reaction. The half-life and the auto-induction of efavirenz may explain the continued rise in liver enzymes and severe hepatitis that continued to occur once the drug was discontinued. Another cause that may have contributed is the metabolism of the medication. CYP2B6 is responsible for almost 90% of the clearance of efavirenz. Data from a recent pharmacokinetic study showed that efavirenz concentrations were higher in both black and Latino patients when compared with those of white patients. In addition, it is highly probable that this patient's liver function was impaired when transaminase levels peaked, resulting in decreased clearance of efavirenz.

Conclusions:

Although such a hypersensitivity reaction is rare, efavirenz is the most probable cause of the erythematous maculopapular rash and acute hepatitis in this patient. Monitoring of liver function in patients who present with a rash following initiation of efavirenz-based HAART is recommended. In addition, clinicians should exercise caution in patients presenting with rash, fever, and increased liver enzymes (>3 times the upper limit of normal or patient baseline). It is strongly recommended that efavirenz therapy be withheld in such cases and reevaluated once liver enzyme levels stabilize.

Is it safe to switch between efavirenz and nevirapine in the event of toxicity?

The non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) efavirenz and nevirapine are chemically distinct, but both may cause cutaneous hypersensitivity and hepatotoxicity. We reviewed the literature to assess the evidence for cross-reactivity between nevirapine and efavirenz. All papers, abstracts, or presentations, regardless of study design, that made reference to the response of patients who were switched from one NNRTI to another as a result of an adverse drug reaction were included. Most of the studies were retrospective. Recurrent reactions occurred in 30 (12.6%) of 239 reported patients with rash who were switched from nevirapine to efavirenz, compared with eight (50%) of 16 patients switched from efavirenz to nevirapine. Hepatitis did not recur in either the 11 reported patients switched from nevirapine to efavirenz, or in the single reported patient who was switched from efavirenz to nevirapine. Substituting efavirenz for nevirapine following hepatotoxicity or cutaneous hypersensitivity appears to be reasonable, providing that the adverse reaction to nevirapine was not life-threatening. There is insufficient evidence to recommend substituting nevirapine for efavirenz following either hepatotoxicity or cutaneous hypersensitivity.

Liver toxicity induced by non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

Liver toxicity is one of the most relevant adverse effects of antiretroviral therapy. Within the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), efavirenz can be considered a safer drug for the liver than nevirapine. In fact, the frequency of severe increased liver enzymes in patients on efavirenz ranges from 1 to 8%, whereas in patients treated with nevirapine, it ranges from 4 to 18%. Likewise, nevirapine is more commonly associated than efavirenz with early acute hepatitis, which is produced by a hypersensitivity mechanism and has a defined risk profile that often makes it avoidable. Despite the fact that most cases of NNRTI-induced liver toxicity are asymptomatic, the rates of symptomatic events in patients treated with nevirapine are greater than in subjects on efavirenz. In any case, it is unusual for an NNRTI to be suspended due to liver toxicity.

The Liver in HIV in Africa

As access to antiretroviral therapy improves across the African continent, liver disease is emerging as an important cause of morbidity and mortality among HIV-infected individuals. Although coinfection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV), along with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)-induced hepatotoxicity appear to be the major causes of liver disease in this population, other diseases endemic to Africa with hepatic manifestations are influenced by HIV infection as well. In this review we present the available data on liver disease in HIV-infected populations in Africa and discuss relevant data from the rest of the world. In addition, we highlight important areas for further study.