Pharmacodynamic activity of telithromycin against macrolide-susceptible and macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae simulating clinically achievable free serum and epithelial lining fluid concentrations

Predicting Antimicrobial Activity at the Target Site: Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Indices versus Time-Kill Approaches

Antibiotic dosing strategies are generally based on systemic drug concentrations. However, drug concentrations at the infection site drive antimicrobial effect, and efficacy predictions and dosing strategies should be based on these concentrations. We set out to review different translational pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) approaches from a target site perspective. The most common approach involves calculating the probability of attaining animal-derived PK/PD index targets, which link PK parameters to antimicrobial susceptibility measures. This approach is time efficient but ignores some aspects of the shape of the PK profile and inter-species differences in drug clearance and distribution, and provides no information on the PD time-course. Time–kill curves, in contrast, depict bacterial response over time. In vitro dynamic time–kill setups allow for the evaluation of bacterial response to clinical PK profiles, but are not representative of the infection site environment. The translational value of in vivo time–kill experiments, conversely, is limited from a PK perspective. Computational PK/PD models, especially when developed using both in vitro and in vivo data and coupled to target site PK models, can bridge translational gaps in both PK and PD. Ultimately, clinical PK and experimental and computational tools should be combined to tailor antibiotic treatment strategies to the site of infection.

Pharmacokinetic modelling of serum and bronchial concentrations for clarithromycin and telithromycin, and site-specific pharmacodynamic simulation for their dosages

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Clinical pharmacokinetic profiles of clarithromycin and telithromycin in bronchopulmonary sites have not been fully characterized. This study aimed to describe in more detail the pharmacokinetics of the two macrolides in epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of human bronchi and to evaluate their pharmacodynamic target attainment at this site.

METHODS

Previously reported drug concentration data for serum and ELF were simultaneously fitted to a three-compartment pharmacokinetic model using nonmem program. The model parameter estimates were used for site-specific pharmacodynamic simulation.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Population mean parameters for clarithromycin were as follows: distribution volumes of central, peripheral and ELF compartments (V1 /F, V2 /F and V3 /F) = 204·7, 168·9 and 67·1 L; clearance (CL/F) = 34·4 L/h; absorption rate constant (Ka ) = 0·680 1/h; transfer rate constants connecting compartments (K12 , K21 , K13 and K31  = 0·0193, 0·434, 0·667 and 0·260 1/h, respectively). Mean parameters for telithromycin were as follows: V1 /F, V2 /F and V3 /F = 370·3, 290·3 and 213·8 L; CL/F = 89·5 L/h; Ka  = 0·740 1/h; K12 , K21 , K13 and K31  = 0·0026, 1·044, 0·758 and 0·158 1/h, respectively. Using these parameters, the mean ELF/serum ratio in the area under drug concentration-time curve (AUC) was 7·80 for clarithromycin and 8·05 for telithromycin. Clarithromycin achieved a ≥ 90% probability of attaining a pharmacodynamic target [AUC/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) = 100] in ELF against bacterial isolates for which MICs were ≤0·5 and ≤1 mg/L for twice-daily doses of 250 and 500 mg, respectively. For telithromycin, once-daily doses of 600 and 800 mg achieved a ≥90% probability in ELF against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus and Moraxella catarrhalis isolates but not Haemophilus influenzae isolates.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

These results should provide a better understanding of the bronchial pharmacokinetics of clarithromycin and telithromycin, while also providing useful information about their dosages for respiratory tract infections based on site-specific pharmacodynamic evaluation. Further studies in a large number of patients are needed to confirm our findings and clarify their therapeutic implications.

Penetration of anti-infective agents into pulmonary epithelial lining fluid: focus on antibacterial agents

The exposure-response relationship of anti-infective agents at the site of infection is currently being re-examined. Epithelial lining fluid (ELF) has been suggested as the site (compartment) of antimicrobial activity against lung infections caused by extracellular pathogens. There have been an extensive number of studies conducted during the past 20 years to determine drug penetration into ELF and to compare plasma and ELF concentrations of anti-infective agents. The majority of these studies estimated ELF drug concentrations by the method of urea dilution and involved either healthy adult subjects or patients undergoing diagnostic bronchoscopy. Antibacterial agents such as macrolides, ketolides, newer fluoroquinolones and oxazolidinones have ELF to plasma concentration ratios of >1. In comparison, β-lactams, aminoglycosides and glycopeptides have ELF to plasma concentration ratios of ≤1. Potential explanations (e.g. drug transporters, overestimation of the ELF volume, lysis of cells) for why these differences in ELF penetration occur among antibacterial classes need further investigation. The relationship between ELF concentrations and clinical outcomes has been under-studied. In vitro pharmacodynamic models, using simulated ELF and plasma concentrations, have been used to examine the eradication rates of resistant and susceptible pathogens and to explain why selected anti-infective agents (e.g. those with ELF to plasma concentration ratios of >1) are less likely to be associated with clinical treatment failures. Population pharmacokinetic modelling and Monte Carlo simulations have recently been used and permit ELF and plasma concentrations to be evaluated with regard to achievement of target attainment rates. These mathematical modelling techniques have also allowed further examination of drug doses and differences in the time courses of ELF and plasma concentrations as potential explanations for clinical and microbiological effects seen in clinical trials. Further studies are warranted in patients with lower respiratory tract infections to confirm and explore the relationships between ELF concentrations, clinical and microbiological outcomes, and pharmacodynamic parameters.

Intracellular pharmacokinetics of telithromycin, a ketolide antibiotic, in alveolar macrophages

OBJECTIVES

Telithromycin, a ketolide antibiotic, has an antibacterial range that covers intracellular parasitic pathogens that survive or multiply intracellularly in alveolar macrophages. The intracellular pharmacokinetics of TEL in alveolar macrophages was evaluated in vitro.

METHODS

Telithromycin (50 microm) was applied to NR8383 as cultured alveolar macrophages, followed by incubation at 37 degrees C or 4 degrees C. After incubation, the amount of telithromycin in cells was determined.

KEY FINDINGS

Telithromycin exhibited high accumulation in NR8383 and its intracellular accumulation was temperature dependent. Also, telithromycin distributed to the organelles and cytosol in NR8383 and, in particular, it accumulated in the acidic organelle compartments.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the high accumulation of telithromycin in NR8383 is due to its high influx via active transport systems and trapping in acidic organelles, such as lysosomes. Moreover, this study provides important information for optimizing the treatment of respiratory intracellular parasitic infections based on the intracellular pharmacokinetics of antibiotics and parasitic sites.

Telithromycin in lower respiratory tract infections

Telithromycin is a ketolide, a semisynthetic derivative of the 14-membered ring macrolide antibiotics, with an expanded spectrum of activity relative to macrolides. Its good tissue pharmacokinetic characteristics allows once-daily administration, and it has been successfully employed in lower respiratory tract infections. Recent data indicate that telithromycin may exert anti-inflammatory/immunomodulatory effects that may be of use in the treatment of both acute and chronic airway diseases. This review examines the role of telithromycin in lower respiratory tract infections, analyzing published data on exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, community-acquired pneumonia and asthma in adults. In addition, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the drug are considered.

Pharmacodynamics of simulated total versus free-drug serum concentrations of a low versus a high protein bound third-generation oral cephalosporin (Cefpodoxime versus cefditoren) against Streptococcus pneumoniae

Pharmacodynamic parameters and bactericidal activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae were investigated by simulating total and free serum concentrations of cefpodoxime versus cefditoren. Total drug T>MIC against the penicillin-intermediate (PISP) and resistant (PRSP) strains were 70.6% and 42.9% for cefpodoxime, and 89.6% and 62.5% for cefditoren, respectively. Comparing activity of free versus total cefpodoxime, there were reductions of 8.5% and 19.1% in T>MIC, related to bactericidal activity reductions from approximately 4.5 to 3 log(10), and from 3 to 2.5 log(10 )against PISP and PRSP, respectively, at 10-12h. For cefditoren, reductions of 45.4% and 100% in T>MIC, were related to bactericidal activity reductions from approximately 5.5 to 2-2.5 log(10 )and from approximately 2.5 to 1.5 log(10 )against PISP and PRSP, respectively, at 10-12h. Higher differences in activity were found against the less resistant strains when comparing total versus free-drug profile.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and gastrointestinal tolerability of a novel extended-release microsphere formulation of azithromycin

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

A novel oral, extended-release, microsphere formulation of azithromycin (AZSR) was developed to improve the gastrointestinal tolerability profile while allowing administration of an entire treatment course of azithromycin in a single dose. Several phase I clinical pharmacology studies were conducted to (i) identify a well-tolerated single-dose formulation that met a predefined exposure target; and (ii) evaluate the effect of food and antacid on the absorption of this formulation. Of these, five pivotal studies are described here.

METHODS

The pharmacokinetic profile of AZSR was compared with that of the commercially available immediate-release azithromycin formulation (AZM) in an open-label, crossover, single-dose study (Study A), and their gastrointestinal tolerability profiles were compared in an observer-blind, parallel group, single-dose study (Study B). The effects of food (a high-fat meal and a standard meal) and antacid (a single 20 mL dose of Maalox Regular Strength, containing magnesium hydroxide, aluminium hydroxide and simethicone) on the absorption of azithromycin from AZSR were evaluated in three separate open-label, crossover, single-dose studies (Studies C, D and E). Healthy adult subjects were enrolled in all five studies, and all subjects were evaluable for tolerability. The dose used for all azithromycin formulations was 2.0 g. Serum azithromycin concentrations were determined using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography/electrochemical detection method, and pharmacokinetic parameters were analysed using noncompartmental methods.

RESULTS

377 subjects received a single 2.0 g dose of azithromycin as AZSR and/or AZM in the five studies. Compared with AZM, AZSR had a slower absorption rate (57% decrease in the mean peak concentration [C(max)] and an approximate 2.5-hour delay in the time to reach C(max) [t(max)]), with a mean relative bioavailability of 82.8%, which met the predefined exposure target (at least 80% bioavailability relative to AZM). Compared with AZM, AZSR was associated with significantly lower rates of nausea and vomiting. A high-fat meal increased the mean area under the serum concentration-time curve [AUC] from time zero to 72 hours post-dose (AUC(72 h)) by 23% and increased the C(max) of azithromycin by 115%. A standard meal increased the mean C(max) by 119% but had no clinically significant effect on the AUC(72 h). AZSR appeared to be better tolerated in the fasted state than in the fed state. The AUC(72 h) and C(max) of AZSR were not significantly affected by co-administration with a single dose of antacid.

CONCLUSIONS

The extended-release microsphere formulation of azithromycin, AZSR, allows administration of an entire therapeutic course of azithromycin as a well-tolerated single 2.0 g dose. This formulation should be administered on an empty stomach and can be co-administered with antacids.

Comparative in vitro and bactericidal activities of telithromycin against penicillin-nonsusceptible, levofloxacin-resistant, and macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae by time-kill methodology

Broth microdilution MICs were determined for 14 antimicrobial agents against 296 clinical, non-duplicate isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae collected at Methodist Hospital (Indianapolis, Indiana, USA) from January 2001 to December 2003. Isolates were categorized as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints. Time-kill studies were performed to evaluate the bactericidal activity of telithromycin at 1, 2, 4, and 8x MIC against 10 penicillin-nonsusceptible, levofloxacin-resistant, and macrolide-resistant (7 M-phenotype, 3 MLS(B)-phenotype) strains. Bactericidal activity was defined as a >/=3-log(10) reduction in CFU/mL. The prevalence of resistance was highest for the macrolides (32%), followed by penicillin (16.2%), clindamycin (10.8%), amoxicillin+/-clavulanate (4.4%), levofloxacin (3.0%), gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin (2.4%), ceftriaxone and cefotaxime (2.0%), and gemifloxacin (1.4%). None of the isolates tested were resistant to telithromycin. At 24h, telithromycin was bactericidal for 0/10, 2/10, 7/10, and 7/10 isolates at 1x MIC, 2x MIC, 4x MIC, and 8x MIC, respectively. At 4-8x MIC, telithromycin was bactericidal for 7/7 M-phenotype isolates and 0/3 MLS(B)-phenotype isolates. For the MLS(B)-phenotype isolates, colony counts were decreased by 1.3-2.1log(10) colony-forming units/mL after 24h at 8x MIC. Overall, telithromycin was highly active against 296 isolates of S. pneumoniae from our institution and demonstrated bactericidal activity at clinically achievable concentrations for 7 of 10 penicillin-nonsusceptible, levofloxacin-resistant, and macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae. However, telithromycin was bacteriostatic for the MLS(B)-phenotype isolates.

Human serum activity of telithromycin, azithromycin and amoxicillin/clavulanate against common aerobic and anaerobic respiratory pathogens

Telithromycin is a new ketolide antimicrobial with a good in vitro activity against both aerobic and anaerobic respiratory pathogens. In this study, we evaluated the antibacterial activity over time of telithromycin (800mg), azithromycin (500mg), and amoxicillin/clavulanate (875/125mg) in serum following single oral doses of these agents to 10 healthy subjects. Inhibitory and bactericidal titers were determined at 2, 6, 12, and 24h after each dose and the median titer was used to determine antibacterial activity. Against two azithromycin-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae, both telithromycin (MIC=0.25 and 0.5 microg/mL) and amoxicillin/clavulanate exhibited inhibitory and cidal activity for at least 6h. All three antibiotics provided prolonged (>or=12h) inhibitory activity against strains of Hemophilus influenzae (telithromycin MIC=4.0 microg/ml). Both telithromycin and amoxicillin/clavulanate exhibited rapid and prolonged inhibitory activity (>or=12h) against each of the anaerobes studied (Finegoldia [Peptostreptococcus] magna Peptostreptococcus micros, Prevotella bivia, and Prevotella melaninogenica). Moreover, both agents provided bactericidal activity against both Prevotella species. In this ex vivo pharmacodynamic study, we found that telithromycin provided rapid and prolonged antibacterial activity in serum against macrolide-resistant strains of S. pneumoniae, beta-lactamase-positive and -negative strains of H. influenzae, and common respiratory anaerobic pathogens. These findings suggest that telithromycin could have clinical utility in the treatment of community-acquired mixed aerobic-anaerobic respiratory tract infections, including chronic sinusitis and aspiration pneumonia.

Use of Pharmacodynamic Principles to Optimise Dosage Regimens for Antibacterial Agents in the Elderly

Throughout most of the world we are witnessing an ever increasing number of aged people as a percentage of the general population. In the coming years, the unique spectrum of infections presented by an elderly population, particularly those in long-term care facilities, will challenge our ability to maintain an effective battery of antibacterials. The pharmacokinetic parameters of most antibacterial agents are altered when assessed in the elderly due in part to non-pathological physiological changes. The inability to clear a drug from the body due to declining lung, kidney/bladder, gastrointestinal and circulatory efficiency can cause accumulation in the body of drugs given in standard dosages. While this may have the potential benefit of achieving therapeutic concentrations at a lower dose, there is also a heightened risk of attaining toxic drug concentrations and an increased chance of unfavourable interactions with other medications. Pharmacodynamic issues in the elderly are related to problems that arise from treating elderly patients who may have a history of previous antibacterial treatment and exposure to resistant organisms from multiple hospitalisations. Furthermore, the elderly often acquire infections in tandem with other common disease states such as diabetes mellitus and heart disease. Thus, it is essential that optimised dosage strategies be designed specifically for this population using pharmacodynamic principles that take into account the unique circumstances of the elderly. Rational and effective dosage and administration strategies based on pharmacodynamic breakpoints and detailed understanding of the pharmacokinetics of antibacterials in the elderly increase the chances of achieving complete eradication of an infection in a timely manner. In addition, this strategy helps prevent selection of drug-resistant bacteria and minimises the toxic effects of antibacterial therapy in the elderly patient.

[Antibiotherapy for acute CAP in adults]

Community acquired pneumonia is one of the most frequent infections. With time, bacterial epidemiology and bacterial resistance evolve and new antibiotics become available. So an up-date on adequate antibiotic use is necessary. We reviewed the epidemiology of pneumonia and the evolution of bacterial resistance. We also collected data on new antibiotics which can be used for this infection such as levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, telithromycin, and pristinamycin. All these drugs are effective on bacteria involved in pneumonia. At this time, only few Streptococcus pneumoniae strains have developed resistance to these drugs. However, resistance to fluoroquinolones is not easily detected with common laboratory techniques. There is no effectiveness difference between the 2 new fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, moxifloxacin) in clinical studies. However, in bacteriological and pharmacological studies, moxifloxacin seems to be more effective than levofloxacin (500 mg/day). For the treatment of pneumonia due to Legionella pneumophila, fluoroquinolones are now widely recommended. For Streptococcus pneumonia, amoxicillin remain the drug of choice, even for bacteria with a decreased susceptibility to penicillin. The importance of treating atypical pathogens remains to be documented.

Intrapulmonary Concentrations of Telithromycin: Clinical Implications for Respiratory Tract Infections due to Streptococcus pneumoniae

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial efficacy is dependent on the ability of the agent to reach the site of infection. To assess the bronchopulmonary drug disposition of a novel ketolide, telithromycin (TEL), the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and alveolar macrophage (AM) concentrations were utilized as a surrogate marker for lung penetration.

METHODS

Adult subjects scheduled for diagnostic bronchoscopy received oral TEL 800 mg once daily for 5 days. Plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples were collected 2, 8, 12, or 24 h after the last TEL dose. TEL concentrations in the ELF and AM were determined using a validated HPLC assay. ELF drug concentrations were calculated using the urea dilution method.

RESULTS

Seventeen subjects with a mean age 65 +/- 13 years and a mean weight of 81 +/- 25 kg completed this open-label study. The median (range) TEL concentrations in plasma and ELF, respectively, were 1.09 mg/l (1.00-4.81) and 3.91 mg/l (2.64-9.59) at 2 h (n = 6), 0.48 and 1.09 mg/l at 8 h (n = 1), 0.65 mg/l (0.18-1.55) and 1.81 mg/l (0.61-10.0) at 12 h (n = 5), and 0.11 mg/l (0.09-0.24) and 0.69 mg/l (0.15-1.58) at 24 h (n = 5). The median AM concentrations obtained from these subjects were 53.35 mg/l at 2 h, 32.55 mg/l at 8 h, 65.96 mg/l at 12 h, and 26.43 mg/l at 24 h. Overall TEL was well tolerated. No discontinuation was required due to an adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

TEL displayed high intrapulmonary penetration with ELF concentrations exceeding that of plasma at all time points. AM intracellular concentrations were multiple times higher than in the ELF and plasma. These data support the clinical efficacy of TEL against intracellular and extracellular pathogens, particularly with Streptococcus pneumoniae having an MIC(90 )well below achievable concentrations at the site of infection.

Telithromycin: The first ketolide antimicrobial

BACKGROUND

Telithromycin is the first of the ketolide antibacterials to receive US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for clinical use. It is approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB), and acute maxillary sinusitis (AMS) in adults.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the mechanism of action, in vitro antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, safety, and drug-interaction profile of telithromycin.

METHODS

Relevant studies were identified through a search of the English-language literature indexed on MEDLINE (1990-March 2005) using the terms telithromycin and HMR 3647, a review of the reference lists of identified articles, and a review of the briefing document prepared by the manufacturer of telithromycin for presentation to the FDA Anti-infective Drugs Advisory Committee. A search of abstracts from the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2001-2004) also was performed.

RESULTS

The results of in vitro susceptibility studies suggest that telithromycin provides coverage against the key respiratory pathogens, both typical and atypical. In addition, telithromycin may be useful against multidrug-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae and against Haemophilus influenzae, irrespective of beta-lactamase production. In randomized, double-blind, comparative trials (against amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefuroxime axetil, clarithromycin, moxifloxacin, or trovafloxacin), telithromycin had comparable efficacy to its comparators in the empiric treatment of CAP (4 studies), AECB (3 studies), and AMS (3 studies). Telithromycin is dosed at 800 mg (two 400-mg tablets) QD in community-acquired respiratory tract infections (RTIs). No dose adjustment is required in the elderly, patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency, or patients with hepatic insufficiency. The majority of adverse events associated with telithromycin were mild to moderate, with gastrointestinal effects (diarrhea, nausea, vomiting) being the most commonly reported, followed by headache and dizziness. Telithromycin has been associated with elevations in hepatic transaminases and prolongation of the electrocardiographic QTc interval, although the significance of these findings is not known. Telithromycin is also a strong inhibitor of and substrate for the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 isozyme. Therefore, it is important to monitor for potential drug interactions with medications that prolong the QTc interval or are metabolized by the CYP system.

CONCLUSIONS

Telithromycin appears to be a useful option for the empiric treatment of community-acquired RTIs in adults. It may be particularly useful in the outpatient setting in areas with high rates of penicillin- and macrolide-resistant S pneumoniae; it may also be an alternative agent for patients who are allergic to beta-lactams and live in areas with a high prevalence of multidrug-resistant S pneumoniae or for those who have failed to respond to beta-lactam- or macrolide-based therapy.

Pharmacodynamic activity of telithromycin at simulated clinically achievable free-drug concentrations in serum and epithelial lining fluid against efflux (mefE)-producing macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae for which telithromycin MICs vary

The present study, using an in vitro model, assessed telithromycin pharmacodynamic activity at simulated clinically achievable free-drug concentrations in serum (S) and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) against efflux (mefE)-producing macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Two macrolide-susceptible (PCR negative for both mefE and ermB) and 11 efflux-producing macrolide-resistant [PCR-positive for mefE and negative for ermB) S. pneumoniae strains with various telithromycin MICs (0.015 to 1 microg/ml) were tested. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of telithromycin were modeled, simulating a dosage of 800 mg orally once daily administered at time 0 and at 24 h (free-drug maximum concentration [C(max)] in serum, 0.7 microg/ml; half-life [t(1/2)], 10 h; free-drug C(max) in ELF, 6.0 microg/ml; t(1/2), 10 h). Starting inocula were 10(6) CFU/ml in Mueller-Hinton Broth with 2% lysed horse blood. Sampling at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h assessed the extent of bacterial killing (decrease in log(10) CFU/ml versus initial inoculum). Free-telithromycin concentrations in serum achieved in the model were C(max) 0.9 +/- 0.08 microg/ml, area under the curve to MIC (AUC(0-24 h)) 6.4 +/- 1.5 microg . h/ml, and t(1/2) of 10.6 +/- 0.6 h. Telithromycin-free ELF concentrations achieved in the model were C(max) 6.6 +/- 0.8 microg/ml, AUC(0-24 h) 45.5 +/- 5.5 microg . h/ml, and t(1/2) of 10.5 +/- 1.7 h. Free-telithromycin S and ELF concentrations rapidly eradicated efflux-producing macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae with telithromycin MICs up to and including 0.25 microg/ml and 1 microg/ml, respectively. Free-telithromycin S and ELF concentrations simulating C(max)/MIC > or = 3.5 and AUC(0-24 h)/MIC > or = 25 completely eradicated (> or =4 log(10) killing) macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae at 24 and 48 h. Free-telithromycin concentrations in serum simulating C(max)/MIC > or = 1.8 and AUC(0-24 h)/MIC > or = 12.5 were bacteriostatic (0.1 to 0.2 log(10) killing) against macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae at 24 and 48 h. In conclusion, free-telithromycin concentrations in serum and ELF simulating C(max)/MIC > or = 3.5 and AUC(0-24 h)/MIC > or = 25 completely eradicated (> or =4 log(10) killing) macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae at 24 and 48 h.