Plasma concentrations might lead to overestimation of target site activity of piperacillin in patients with sepsis

Predicting Antimicrobial Activity at the Target Site: Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Indices versus Time-Kill Approaches

Antibiotic dosing strategies are generally based on systemic drug concentrations. However, drug concentrations at the infection site drive antimicrobial effect, and efficacy predictions and dosing strategies should be based on these concentrations. We set out to review different translational pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) approaches from a target site perspective. The most common approach involves calculating the probability of attaining animal-derived PK/PD index targets, which link PK parameters to antimicrobial susceptibility measures. This approach is time efficient but ignores some aspects of the shape of the PK profile and inter-species differences in drug clearance and distribution, and provides no information on the PD time-course. Time–kill curves, in contrast, depict bacterial response over time. In vitro dynamic time–kill setups allow for the evaluation of bacterial response to clinical PK profiles, but are not representative of the infection site environment. The translational value of in vivo time–kill experiments, conversely, is limited from a PK perspective. Computational PK/PD models, especially when developed using both in vitro and in vivo data and coupled to target site PK models, can bridge translational gaps in both PK and PD. Ultimately, clinical PK and experimental and computational tools should be combined to tailor antibiotic treatment strategies to the site of infection.

Which Analysis Approach Is Adequate to Leverage Clinical Microdialysis Data? A Quantitative Comparison to Investigate Exposure and Reponse Exemplified by Levofloxacin

Purpose

Systematic comparison of analysis methods of clinical microdialysis data for impact on target-site drug exposure and response.

Methods

39 individuals received a 500 mg levofloxacin short-term infusion followed by 24-h dense sampling in plasma and microdialysate collection in interstitial space fluid (ISF). ISF concentrations were leveraged using non-compartmental (NCA) and compartmental analysis (CA) via (ii) relative recovery correction at midpoint of the collection interval (midpoint-NCA, midpoint-CA) and (ii) dialysate-based integrals of time (integral-CA). Exposure and adequacy of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) therapy via pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target-attainment (PTA) analysis were compared between approaches.

Results

Individual AUC_ISF estimates strongly varied for midpoint-NCA and midpoint-CA (≥52.3%CV) versus integral-CA (≤32.9%CV) owing to separation of variability in PK parameters (midpoint-CA = 46.5%–143%CV_PK, integral-CA = 26.4%–72.6%CV_PK) from recovery-related variability only in integral-CA (41.0%–50.3%CV_recovery). This also led to increased variability of AUC_plasma for midpoint-CA (56.0%CV) versus midpoint-NCA and integral-CA (≤33.0%CV), and inaccuracy of predictive model performance of midpoint-CA in plasma (visual predictive check). PTA analysis translated into 33% of evaluated patient cases being at risk of incorrectly rejecting recommended dosing regimens at CAP-related epidemiological cut-off values.

Conclusions

Integral-CA proved most appropriate to characterise clinical pharmacokinetics- and microdialysis-related variability. Employing this knowledge will improve the understanding of drug target-site PK for therapeutic decision-making.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11095-021-02994-1.

Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics issues relevant for the clinical use of beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients

Antimicrobials are among the most important and commonly prescribed drugs in the management of critically ill patients and beta-lactams are the most common antibiotic class used. Critically ill patient's pathophysiological factors lead to altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of beta-lactams.A comprehensive bibliographic search in PubMed database of all English language articles published from January 2000 to December 2017 was performed, allowing the selection of articles addressing the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients.In critically ill patients, several factors may increase volume of distribution and enhance renal clearance, inducing high intra- and inter-patient variability in beta-lactam concentration and promoting the risk of antibiotic underdosing. The duration of infusion of beta-lactams has been shown to influence the fT > minimal inhibitory concentration and an improved beta-lactam pharmacodynamics profile may be obtained by longer exposure with more frequent dosing, extended infusions, or continuous infusions.The use of extracorporeal support techniques in the critically ill may further contribute to this problem and we recommend not reducing standard antibiotic dosage since no drug accumulation was found in the available literature and to maintain continuous or prolonged infusion, especially for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria.Prediction of outcome based on concentrations in plasma results in overestimation of antimicrobial activity at the site of infection, namely in cerebrospinal fluid and the lung. Therefore, although no studies have assessed clinical outcome, we recommend using higher than standard dosing, preferably with continuous or prolonged infusions, especially when treating less susceptible bacterial strains at these sites, as the pharmacodynamics profile may improve with no apparent increase in toxicity.A therapeutic drug monitoring-guided approach could be particularly useful in critically ill patients in whom achieving target concentrations is more difficult, such as obese patients, immunocompromised patients, those infected by highly resistant bacterial strains, patients with augmented renal clearance, and those undergoing extracorporeal support techniques.

New paradigm for rapid achievement of appropriate therapy in special populations: coupling antibiotic dose optimization rapid microbiological methods

INTRODUCTION

Some special patient populations (e.g. critically ill, burns, hematological malignancy, post-major surgery, post-major trauma) have characteristics that lead to higher rates of failure and mortality associated with infection. Choice of effective antibiotics and optimized doses are challenging in these patients that are commonly infected by multidrug-resistant pathogens. Areas covered: A review of the importance of diagnosis and the place of newer microbiological methods (e.g. whole-genome sequencing) to ensure rapid transition from empiric to directed antibiotic therapy is provided. The effects of pathophysiological changes on antibiotic pharmacokinetics are also provided. Expert opinion: Product information dosing regimens do not address the pharmacokinetic alterations that can occur in special patient populations and increase the likelihood of therapeutic failure and the emergence of bacterial resistance. Altered dosing approaches, supplemented with the use of dosing software and therapeutic drug monitoring, may be needed to ensure optimal antibiotic exposure and better therapeutic outcomes in these patients with severe infection. Dose optimization needs to be coupled with advanced microbiological techniques that enable rapid microbiological identification and characterization of resistance mechanism to ensure that maximally effective directed therapy can be chosen.

Optimizing β-lactams treatment in critically-ill patients using pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics targets: are first conventional doses effective?

INTRODUCTION

The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index determining β-lactam activity is the percentage of the dosing interval (%T) during which their free serum concentration remains above a critical threshold over the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Regrettably, neither the value of %T nor that of the threshold are clearly defined for critically-ill patients. Areas covered: We review and assess the targets proposed for β-lactams in critical illness by screening the literature since 1997. Depending on the study intention (clinical cure vs. suppression of resistance), targets proposed range from 20%T > 1xMIC to 100%T > 5xMIC. Assessment and comparative analysis of their respective clinical efficacy suggest that a value of 100%T > 4xMIC may be needed. Simulation studies, however, show that this target will not be reached at first dose for the majority of critically-ill patients if using the most commonly recommended doses. Expert commentary: Considering that critically-ill patients are highly vulnerable and likely to experience antibiotic underexposure, and because effective initial treatment is a key determinant of clinical outcome, we support the use of a target of 100%T > 4xMIC, which could not only maximize efficacy but also minimize emergence of resistance. Clinical and microbiological studies are needed to test for the feasibility and effectiveness of reaching such a demanding target.

Translational PK/PD of anti-infective therapeutics

Translational PK/PD modeling has emerged as a critical technique for quantitative analysis of the relationship between dose, exposure and response of antibiotics. By combining model components for pharmacokinetics, bacterial growth kinetics and concentration-dependent drug effects, these models are able to quantitatively capture and simulate the complex interplay between antibiotic, bacterium and host organism. Fine-tuning of these basic model structures allows to further account for complicating factors such as resistance development, combination therapy, or host responses. With this tool set at hand, mechanism-based PK/PD modeling and simulation allows to develop optimal dosing regimens for novel and established antibiotics for maximum efficacy and minimal resistance development.

Antibiotic Dosing in Patients With Acute Kidney Injury: "Enough But Not Too Much"

Increasing evidence suggests that antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) often does not achieve pharmacodynamic goals, and the continued high mortality rate due to infectious causes appears to confirm these findings. Although there are compelling reasons why clinicians should use more aggressive antibiotic dosing, particularly in patients receiving aggressive renal replacement therapies, concerns for toxicity associated with higher doses are real. The presence of multisystem organ failure and polypharmacy predispose these patients to drug toxicity. This article examines the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic consequences of critical illness, AKI, and renal replacement therapy and describes potential solutions to help clinicians give "enough but not too much" in these very complicated patients.

Enhanced penetration of moxifloxacin into rat prostate tissue evidenced by microdialysis

Moxifloxacin is reported to have increased distribution into the prostate compared with older fluoroquinolones such as norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin, being able to reach tissue-to-plasma concentration ratios greater than unity. However, most of these studies use tissue homogenates derived from biopsy samples, which can lead to overestimation of free concentrations as fluoroquinolones tend to accumulate in the intracellular space. The aim of this study was to investigate moxifloxacin pharmacokinetics in rat prostate interstitial fluid by microdialysis. Tissue pharmacokinetics was assessed by implanting a small microdialysis catheter in the prostate gland. Blood samples were simultaneously collected for assessing plasma pharmacokinetics. Analysis of plasma (N=154) and microdialysis (N=344) concentrations after a single intravenous dose of 6 or 12mg/kg moxifloxacin was conducted in the non-linear mixed-effect modelling software NONMEM v.6 as well by a non-compartmental approach. Moxifloxacin showed a significant tissue distribution in the prostate (AUCprostate,ISF/fu·AUCplasma=1.24±0.37), 59% higher than the value obtained for levofloxacin in a previous study. A three-compartment model with non-linear kinetics could adequately describe moxifloxacin pharmacokinetics in terms of curve fitting and precision in parameter estimation. The developed pharmacokinetic model indicates that passive diffusion and active transport are the mechanisms involved in moxifloxacin distribution to the prostate. These findings suggest that moxifloxacin could be a better alternative to levofloxacin for the treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis owing to its enhanced tissue penetration and higher AUCtissue/MIC ratios, even though it is not yet approved by the US FDA for this indication.

[Tissue penetration of antibiotics. Does the treatment reach the target site?]

BACKGROUND

For critically ill patients, infections still imply a major challenge for the treating physician. One key factor of successful treatment is sufficient exposure of the employed antimicrobial agent at the site of infection. In most cases, this is the interstitial space of the infected organ or a body cavity; much rarer vital bacteria are located within body cells.

METHODS

Different methods for assessment of tissue pharmacokinetics of antimicrobial agents in the human body are described, including tissue biopsy, bronchoalveolar lavage and microdialysis, and their implication on interpretation of obtained data are discussed. Tissue pharmacokinetics of the hydrophilic beta-lactam meropenem and the lipophilic fluoroquinolone levofloxacin are compared.

RESULTS

Differences in pharmacokinetics between plasma and tissue, healthy volunteers and critically ill patients but also between data obtained in the same organ by different methods are discussed.

CONCLUSION

In order to use pharmacokinetic data to optimize the treatment of critically ill patients, critical appraisal of the causative pathogen, the location of the infection, and the source of the used pharmacokinetic data is necessary.

Meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam prescribing in critically ill patients: does augmented renal clearance affect pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment when extended infusions are used?

Background

Correct antibiotic dosing remains a challenge for the clinician. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of augmented renal clearance on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment in critically ill patients receiving meropenem or piperacillin/tazobactam, administered as an extended infusion.

Methods

This was a prospective, observational, pharmacokinetic study executed at the medical and surgical intensive care unit at a large academic medical center. Elegible patients were adult patients without renal dysfunction receiving meropenem or piperacillin/tazobactam as an extended infusion. Serial blood samples were collected to describe the antibiotic pharmacokinetics. Urine samples were taken from a 24-hour collection to measure creatinine clearance. Relevant data were drawn from the electronic patient file and the intensive care information system.

Results

We obtained data from 61 patients and observed extensive pharmacokinetic variability. Forty-eight percent of the patients did not achieve the desired pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target (100% fT_>MIC), of which almost 80% had a measured creatinine clearance >130 mL/min. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that high creatinine clearance was an independent predictor of not achieving the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target. Seven out of nineteen patients (37%) displaying a creatinine clearance >130 mL/min did not achieve the minimum pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target of 50% fT_>MIC.

Conclusions

In this large patient cohort, we observed significant variability in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment in critically ill patients. A large proportion of the patients without renal dysfunction, most of whom displayed a creatinine clearance >130 mL/min, did not achieve the desired pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target, even with the use of alternative administration methods. Consequently, these patients may be at risk for treatment failure without dose up-titration.

Antimicrobial dosing in acute renal replacement

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common problem in hospitalized patients and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Two large trials showed no benefit from increased doses of renal replacement therapy (RRT) despite previous clinical data suggesting that increased clearance from RRT has beneficial effects. Since infection is the leading cause of death in AKI, my group and others hypothesized that increased RRT antibiotic clearance might create a competing morbidity. The data from my group, as well as those of other groups, show that many patients are underdosed when routine "1 size fits all" antibiotic dosing is used in patients with AKI receiving continuous RRT (CRRT). Here, concepts of drug distribution and clearance in AKI are briefly discussed and then 1 antibiotic (piperacillin) is discussed in depth to illustrate the challenges in applying the medical literature to clinical practice. The fact that published data on drug dosing in AKI and dialysis reflect the evolution of practice patterns and often do not apply to present prescribing habits is also discussed. A more general approach to drug dosing facilitates situation-specific prescribing by the nephrologist and critical care specialist.

Appropriate antibiotic dosage levels in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock

Antibiotic treatment of critically ill patients remains a significant challenge. Optimal antibacterial strategy should achieve therapeutic drug concentration in the blood as well as the infected site. Achieving therapeutic drug concentrations is particularly difficult when infections are caused by some pathogens, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Gram-negative rods, because of their low susceptibility to antimicrobials. In sepsis, pharmacokinetics (PKs) of antibiotics are profoundly altered and may result in inadequate drug concentrations, even when recommended regimens are used, which potentially contribute to increased mortality and spread of resistance. The wide inter-individual PK variability observed in septic patients strongly limits the a priori prediction of the optimal dose that should be administered. Higher than standard dosages are necessary for the drugs, such as β-lactams, aminoglycosides, and glycopeptides, that are commonly used as first-line therapy in these patients to maximize their antibacterial activity. However, the benefit of reaching adequate drug concentrations on clinical outcome needs to be further determined.

Insufficient β-lactam concentrations in the early phase of severe sepsis and septic shock

Introduction

Altered pharmacokinetics (PK) in critically ill patients can result in insufficient serum β-lactam concentrations when standard dosages are administered. Previous studies on β-lactam PK have generally excluded the most severely ill patients, or were conducted during the steady-state period of treatment. The aim of our study was to determine whether the first dose of piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, and meropenem would result in adequate serum drug concentrations in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

Methods

Open, prospective, multicenter study in four Belgian intensive care units. All consecutive patients with a diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock, in whom treatment with the study drugs was indicated, were included. Serum concentrations of the antibiotics were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) before and 1, 1.5, 4.5 and 6 or 8 hours after administration.

Results

80 patients were treated with piperacillin-tazobactam (n = 27), ceftazidime (n = 18), cefepime (n = 19) or meropenem (n = 16). Serum concentrations remained above 4 times the minimal inhibitory concentration (T > 4 × MIC), corresponding to the clinical breakpoint for Pseudomonas aeruginosa defined by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), for 57% of the dosage interval for meropenem (target MIC = 8 μg/mL), 45% for ceftazidime (MIC = 32 μg/mL), 34% for cefepime (MIC = 32 μg/mL), and 33% for piperacillin-tazobactam (MIC = 64 μg/mL). The number of patients who attained the target PK profile was 12/16 for meropenem (75%), 5/18 for ceftazidime (28%), 3/19 (16%) for cefepime, and 12/27 (44%) for piperacillin-tazobactam.

Conclusions

Serum concentrations of the antibiotic after the first dose were acceptable only for meropenem. Standard dosage regimens for piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime and cefepime may, therefore, be insufficient to empirically cover less susceptible pathogens in the early phase of severe sepsis and septic shock.

Protein binding of antimicrobials: methods for quantification and for investigation of its impact on bacterial killing

Plasma protein binding of antimicrobial agents is considered to be a key characteristic of antibiotics as it affects both their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. However, up to the present, no standard methods for measuring protein binding or for quantification of the influence of protein binding on antimicrobial activity exist. This short-coming has previously led to conflicting results on antibacterial activity of highly protein-bound antibiotics. The present review, therefore, set out to summarize (1) methods for quantification of protein binding, (2) microbiological growth media used for determination of the impact of protein binding on antimicrobial activity of antibiotics, and (3) different pharmacodynamic in vitro studies that are used in this context. The advantages and disadvantages of a wide range of different approaches are discussed and compared. The urgent call for international standardization by microbiological societies and laboratories may be considered as a logical consequence of the presented data.

Clinical scoring system for the prediction of target site penetration of antimicrobials in patients with sepsis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The present study investigated the usefulness of routinely employed scoring systems in predicting tissue penetration of antimicrobials. In addition, a novel, easy to use scoring system was designed for the estimation of tissue penetration of antimicrobials in patients with sepsis.

METHODS

Tissue pharmacokinetics were assessed in skeletal muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissue by use of the microdialysis technique in 34 patients with sepsis. Tissue penetration of antimicrobials was retrospectively determined by the ratios of the area under the concentration-time curves (AUC) in soft tissues (AUCtissue) to the AUC in plasma (AUCplasma). Mortality and sepsis scores currently used in intensive care were consecutively calculated and correlated with the AUCtissue:AUCplasma ratio. Single laboratory and clinical parameters showing the highest correlation with tissue penetration were identified and used in the novel Tissue Penetration Prediction Score (TPPS).

RESULTS

The currently used scoring systems Simplified Acute Physiology Scores 3 (r=-0.33, p=0.006), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III (r=-0.27, p=0.03) and Sepsis-Related (or Sequential) Organ Failure Assessment (r=-0.32, p=0.01) showed significant overall correlations with tissue penetration. However, their predictive power for the concentrations of antimicrobials in muscle tissue was not satisfying. The parameters oxygen saturation, serum lactate concentration and the dose per time unit of norepinephrine (noradrenaline) administered showed the best correlation with tissue penetration and were used in the TPPS. Its overall correlation (r=-0.52, p=0.000007) as well as correlations for the concentrations of antimicrobials in muscle (r=-0.46, p=0.006) and adipose tissue (r=-0.59, p=0.0003) were better than the currently used scoring systems.

CONCLUSION

The TPPS may prove to be a powerful tool for the estimation of antimicrobial tissue penetration at the bedside in septic patients. This score may allow for adequate individual dose adjustment in septic patients. However, this needs to be verified in subsequent prospective clinical trials.