Novel antimicrobial strategies for diabetic foot infections: addressing challenges and resistance

AIMS

This review examines the challenges posed by Diabetic Foot Infections (DFIs), focusing on the impact of neuropathy, peripheral arterial disease, immunopathy, and the polymicrobial nature of these infections. The aim is to explore the factors contributing to antimicrobial resistance and assess the potential of novel antimicrobial treatments and drug delivery systems in improving patient outcomes.

METHOD

A comprehensive analysis of existing literature on DFIs was conducted, highlighting the multifactorial pathogenesis and polymicrobial composition of these infections. The review delves into the rise of antimicrobial resistance due to the overuse of antimicrobials, biofilm formation, and microbial genetic adaptability. Additionally, it considers glycemic control, patient adherence, and recurrence rates as contributing factors to treatment failure. Emerging therapies, including new antimicrobial classes and innovative drug delivery systems, were evaluated for their potential efficacy.

RESULTS

DFIs present unique treatment challenges, with high rates of antimicrobial resistance and poor response to standard therapies. Biofilm formation and the genetic adaptability of pathogens worsen resistance, complicating treatment. Current antimicrobial therapies are further hindered by poor glycemic control and patient adherence, leading to recurrent infections. Novel antimicrobial classes and innovative delivery systems show promise in addressing these challenges by offering more targeted, effective treatments. These new approaches aim to reduce resistance and improve treatment outcomes.

CONCLUSION

DFIs remain a clinical challenge due to their multifactorial nature and antimicrobial resistance. The development of novel antimicrobials and drug delivery systems is crucial to improving patient outcomes and combating resistance. Future research should focus on enhancing treatment efficacy, reducing resistance, and addressing patient adherence to reduce the burden of DFIs.

Is the high dose extended infusion of meropenem useful in the treatment of highly resistant gram-negative bacteria in children?

OBJECTIVES

Multidrug resistant infections present a treatment challenge for clinicians. These infections have been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Recently, there has been increasing discussion in the literature that high dose extended infusion of meropenem may be helpful. We aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of high dose extended infusion of meropenem in the treatment of highly resistant Gram-negative infections.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study was conducted between December 2014 and December 2020 at Hacettepe University Ihsan Dogramaci Children's Hospital. Clinical and microbiological data of children diagnosed with invasive multidrug and extremely drug resistant Gram-negative infections were studied. The findings of patients given high dose extended infusion of meropenem were compared with patients who received colistin or tigecycline.

RESULTS

Overall, 158 pediatric patients infected with multidrug and extremely drug resistant gram-negatives were enrolled; 76 treated with high-dose prolonged infusion of meropenem; 60 treated with colistin and 22 with tigecycline. The overall clinical response at the end of the treatment was 81.6 % in meropenem group, 83.3 % in colistin group and 77.3 % in tigecycline group (P = 0.821). Microbiological response at the end of the treatment was 81.1 % in meropenem group, 76.4 % in colistin group and 72.2 % in tigecycline group (P = 0.694).

CONCLUSION

Meropenem, with an adjusted dose (high-dose and extended), seems a crucial and robust fighting agent in the treatment of pediatric patients infected with highly-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. It may also be useful in preventing the use of the latest fighting tools such as colistin and tigecycline during the antibacterial stewardship process.

Susceptibility of various Gram-negative bacteria to antibacterial agents: SMART in China 2019-2020

BACKGROUND

The Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) is an international surveillance program longitudinally monitoring aerobic and facultative Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) involvement in infections and their antimicrobial resistance profiles. Here the incidence and resistance patterns of Chinese GNB isolates from bloodstream infections (BSI), intraabdominal infections (IAI), respiratory tract infections (RTI) and urinary tract infections (UTI) to commonly used antibacterial agents has been updated. 4,975 GNB isolates collected from 22 hospitals across 7 regions of China from 2019 to 2020 were analyzed. Antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentrations were assessed using broth microdilution, and susceptibility interpretations followed the breakpoints of European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing 2022 or Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.

RESULTS

This study affirmed that Escherichia coli (Ec) was the most commonly identified GNB (32.1%) and then Klebsiella pneumoniae (Kp) (25.3%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) (13.9%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (10.5%). The detection rates of carbapenem-resistant (CR) Enterobacterales varied across major infection sites, ranging from 10.3% in UTI to 18.9% in RTI. Specifically, the detection rates of CR-Kp and CR-Pa ranged from 16.2% in IAI to 35.8% in UTI and from 16.1% in UTI to 38.0% in RTI, respectively. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL)-producing Ec and Kp bacteria exhibited over 91.7% susceptibility to carbapenems and at least 87.8% susceptibility to amikacin and colistin, but showed lower susceptibility to piperacillin/tazobactam (57.5-86.2%), levofloxacin (10.8-39.7%) and aztreonam (15.3-27.6%) across different infection sources. Amikacin showed higher efficacy against CR strains compared to other commonly used antibacterial drugs, with 80.0% susceptibility against CR-Ec and 82.3% susceptibility against CR-Pa, while only 36.3% susceptibility was observed against CR-Kp.

CONCLUSIONS

The study found varying incidences of CR isolates in Chinese hospitals. Treatment options remained limited due to resistance to multiple antibacterial agents. Carbapenems demonstrated effective antimicrobial in vitro activity against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales found in BSI, IAI, UTI and RTI, outperforming broad-spectrum cephalosporins and other β-lactamase inhibitors.

Incidence, antimicrobial resistance and mortality of Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia in Shanghai, China, 2018-2022

BACKGROUND

Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) accounts for high antimicrobial resistance and mortality rates of bloodstream infections (BSIs).

OBJECTIVES

To investigate incidence, antimicrobial resistance and risk factors for mortality of KP BSIs in East China.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with KP BSIs was conducted in a tertiary care hospital from 2018 to 2022. Medical records of all hospitalised patients with KP BSIs were reviewed and analysed. The incidence, antimicrobial resistance and mortality of KP BSIs were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot survival curves and logistic regression was used to analyse risk factors for crude 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 379 inpatients with KP BSIs were enrolled. The incidence of patients with KP BSIs was fluctuating between 4.77 and 9.40 per 100,000 patient-days. The crude 30-day mortality rate of these patients was 26.39%. Of the 379 KPisolates, 197 (51.98%) were carbapenem-resistant (CR) and 252 (66.49%) were multidrug-resistant (MDR). All isolates showed the lowest resistance to tigecycline (13.77%) and polymyxin B (14.61%). Cases with MDR/CR isolates had significantly longer length of hospital stay, higher crude 30-day mortality and medical costs than non-MDR/non-CR isolates. Age, CR phenotype, paracentesis, indwelling central venous catheter (CVC), use of carbapenems, tetracyclines, polymyxins B, and irrational empiric treatment were independently associated with crude 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

MDR/CR KP BSIs are associated with increased mortality, healthcare costs and prolonged hospitalisation. Patients with advanced age, CR phenotype, paracentesis, CVC, exposure to some antibiotics, and irrational empirical antibiotic treatment are at higher mortality risk.

Study of Empiric Antibiotic Prescription Patterns and Microbiological Isolates in Hemodynamically Stable and Unstable ICU Patients With Community-Acquired Sepsis

Background: The efficacy of combination empiric antibiotic therapy for all intensive care unit (ICU) patients with community-acquired sepsis is a subject of ongoing debate in the era of increasing antibiotic resistance. This study was conducted to evaluate the patterns of antibiotic usage and microbial resistance in sepsis patients admitted to the ICU with both hemodynamically stable (HS) and unstable states and to analyze their clinical outcomes. Methods: In this observational study, patients aged 18 years and above who received antibiotics upon admission and had a culture report were included. These patients were categorized into the following groups: HS and hemodynamically unstable (HU), single or combined antibiotics group (more than one antibiotic used empirically to cover one or more groups of organisms), culture-positive and culture-negative group. The microbiological isolates were grouped according to their identified resistance patterns. The outcome parameters involved assessing the differences in empiric antibiotics use upon admission and microbial resistance with hemodynamic stability and investigating any associations with ICU and hospital outcomes. Results: The study included a total of 2675 patients, of which 70.3% were in the HS group, and 29.7% in the HU group. The use of combination antibiotics was significantly higher (p < 0 .0001) across all groups. Carbapenems were used more frequently in the single antibiotic group (p < 0 .001). The culture was positive in 27.8% (n  =  747) of patients. A significantly higher number of patients in the HU group (p < 0 .001) were found to have carbapenem-resistant and multidrug-resistant organisms. The ICU and hospital mortality rates were significantly higher in the HU group (p < 0 .001), the culture-positive group with resistance (p < 0 .001), and the HS patients who received combination antibiotics. Conclusion: The usage of combination antibiotics, coupled with the presence of resistant organisms, emerged as an important variable in predicting ICU and hospital mortality rates in cases of community-acquired sepsis.

Photodynamic inactivation of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in whole blood using riboflavin photodynamic method

Treating bacteremia caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria is a global concern. Antibacterial photodynamic inactivation is a promising strategy to combat it. However, it's challenging to achieve the inactivation of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in whole blood because of its opacity and complexity. We investigated a riboflavin photodynamic method to effectively inactivate antibiotic-resistant bacteria in whole blood. Four strains of antibiotic-resistant bacteria were isolated, identified, and cultured in this research: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), pan-drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (PDRAB), ESBLs-producing Escherichia coli (EPEC) and pan-drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (PDRKP). To simulate bacteremia, antibiotic-resistant bacteria was added into whole blood. Whole blood was treated using riboflavin photodynamic method with ultraviolet irradiation (308 nm and 365 nm). The ultraviolet irradiation dose was divided into 18 J/cm2, 36 J/cm2, and 54 J/cm2. Microbial count of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in whole blood was used for evaluating inactivation effectiveness. The roles of red blood cells, lymphocytes, coagulation factors, and platelets in whole blood were assessed. In results, inactivation effectiveness increased as the ultraviolet dose increased from 18 J/cm2 to 54 J/cm2. At the dose of 18 J/cm2, inactivation effectiveness of four antibiotic-resistant bacteria were more than 80%, while only 67% of MRSA. The antibacterial effect was enhanced by the combination of riboflavin photodynamic treatment and antibiotic. The red blood cell function was susceptible to ultraviolet dose. At the dose of 18 J/cm2, hemolysis rate was less than 0.8% and there was no change in levels of ATP and 2,3-DPG. At the same dose, the proliferation, cell killing, and cytokine secretion activities of lymphocytes decreased 20-70%; Factor V and Factor VIII activities decreased 50%; Fibrinogen and platelet function loss significantly but reparable. Consequently, we speculated that riboflavin photodynamic method with a ultraviolet dose of 18 J/cm2 was effective in inactivating four antibiotic-resistant bacteria in whole blood while whole blood function was preserved. We also provided a novel extracorporeal circulation phototherapy mode for treating bacteremia caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Risk factors of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales intestinal colonization for subsequent infections in hematological patients: a retrospective case-control study

Objective

Infections caused by Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) have high treatment costs, high mortality and few effective therapeutic agents. This study aimed to determine the risk factors for progression from intestinal colonization to infection in hematological patients and the risk factors for 30-day mortality in infected patients.

Methods

A retrospective case-control study was conducted in the Department of Hematology at Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong First Medical University from April 2018 to April 2022. Patients who developed subsequent infections were identified as the case group by electronic medical record query of patients with a positive rectal screen for CRE colonization, and patients who did not develop subsequent infections were identified as the control group by stratified random sampling. Univariate analysis and logistic regression analysis determined risk factors for developing CRE infection and risk factors for mortality in CRE-infected patients.

Results

Eleven hematological patients in the study developed subsequent infections. The overall 30-day mortality rate for the 44 hematological patients in the case-control study was 11.4% (5/44). Mortality was higher in the case group than in the control group (36.5 vs. 3.0%, P = 0.0026), and septic shock was an independent risk factor for death (P = 0.024). Univariate analysis showed that risk factors for developing infections were non-steroidal immunosuppressants, serum albumin levels, and days of hospitalization. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, immunosuppressants [odds ratio (OR), 19.132; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.349-271.420; P = 0.029] and serum albumin levels (OR, 0.817; 95% CI, 0.668-0.999; P = 0.049) were independent risk factors for developing infections.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that septic shock increases mortality in CRE-infected hematological patients. Hematological patients with CRE colonization using immunosuppressive agents and reduced serum albumin are more likely to progress to CRE infection. This study may help clinicians prevent the onset of infection early and take measures to reduce mortality rates.

Mechanistic Approach of Effective Combination of Antibiotics Against Clinical Bacterial Strains Having New Delhi Metallo-Beta-Lactamase Variants and Functional Gain Laboratory Mutant

Antimicrobial resistance has emerged as a serious issue for physicians and health-care workers treating infections that could lead to the next pandemic. One of the key resistance mechanisms is beta-lactamases. Although several beta-lactamase inhibitors in combination with antibiotics have been created and are being utilized in clinical settings, resistance to these formulations has also been evolving in the bacterial population due to their distinct targets. In this study we used effective combination of antibiotic as an approach to inhibit multidrug resistance bacteria. We used four combinations and checked its efficacy against NDM (New Delhi Metallo-beta-lactamase) variants and functional gain laboratory mutant by employing FICI, enzyme kinetics, fluorescence and computational biology approaches (Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulation). FICI values of all the combinations were either less than 0.5 or equal to 0.5. Binding features acquired by spectroscopic techniques showed important interaction and complex formation between drugs and enzymes with decreased ksv and kq values. In steady-state kinetics, a reduction in hydrolytic efficiency of enzymes was shown by cooperative binding behaviour when they were treated with different drugs. We have also tested functional gain laboratory mutant developed in our lab, keeping in view that if in future upcoming variants of this kind be emerged then these mutants could also be subsided by combinational therapy. This study identifies three other combinations better than fluoroquinolones effective against NDM variants and laboratory mutant.

How to treat severe Acinetobacter baumannii infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To update the management of severe Acinetobacter baumannii infections (ABI), particularly those caused by multi-resistant isolates.

RECENT FINDINGS

The in vitro activity of the various antimicrobial agents potentially helpful in treating ABI is highly variable and has progressively decreased for many of them, limiting current therapeutic options. The combination of more than one drug is still advisable in most circumstances. Ideally, two active first-line drugs should be used. Alternatively, a first-line and a second-line drug and, if this is not possible, two or more second-line drugs in combination. The emergence of new agents such as Cefiderocol, the combination of Sulbactam and Durlobactam, and the new Tetracyclines offer therapeutic options that need to be supported by clinical evidence.

SUMMARY

The apparent limitations in treating infections caused by this bacterium, the rapid development of resistance, and the serious underlying situation in most cases invite the search for alternatives to antibiotic treatment, the most promising of which seems to be bacteriophage therapy.

Bibliometric Examination of Global Scientific Research about Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii (CRAB)

This review paper presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the global scientific research pertaining to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) from the years 1996 to 2023. The review employs a systematic approach to evaluate the trends, patterns, and collaborative networks within the CRAB research landscape, shedding light on its substantial global health implications. An analysis of the Scopus database reveals that the earliest publication within the CRAB research domain dates back to 1996. By conducting a meticulous examination of publication output, citation trends, author affiliations, and keyword distributions, this paper provides valuable insights into the evolution of research themes and the emergence of new areas of interest concerning CRAB. The findings of this bibliometric analysis prominently feature the most influential author within this field, namely, Higgins PG, who has contributed a remarkable 39 documents to CRAB research. It is noteworthy that China leads in terms of the quantity of published research articles in this domain, whereas the United States occupies the foremost position about citations within the CRAB research sphere. Furthermore, a more profound exploration of the data yields a heightened understanding of the current status of CRAB research, emphasizing potential avenues for future investigations and underscoring the imperative need for collaborative initiatives to address the challenges posed by this antibiotic-resistant pathogen.

In vitro, in vivo and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy with ceftazidime-avibactam-containing combination regimens against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates or infections: a scoping review

Introduction

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PA) infections are associated with a high risk of morbidity, mortality, and treatment costs. We aimed to evaluate in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) combination regimens with CZA alone against CRE and/or MDR-PA isolates or infections.

Methods

We systematically reviewed the relevant literature in CINAHL/MEDLINE, Pubmed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus until December 1, 2022. Review articles, grey literature, abstracts, comments, editorials, non-peer reviewed articles, non-English articles, and in vitro synergy studies conducted on single isolates were excluded.

Results

22 in vitro, 7 in vivo and 20 clinical studies were evaluated. In vitro studies showed reliable synergy between CZA and aztreonam against metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing isolates. Some studies indicated good in vitro synergy between CZA and amikacin, meropenem, fosfomycin and polymyxins against CRE isolates. For MDR-PA isolates, there are comparatively fewer in vitro or in vivo studies. In observational clinical studies, mortality, clinical cure, adverse events, and development of CZA resistance after exposure were generally similar in monotherapy and combination therapy groups. However, antibiotic-related nephrotoxicity and infection relapses were higher in patients receiving CZA combination therapies.

Discussion

The benefit, if any, of CZA combination regimens in MDR-PA infections is elusive, as very few clinical studies have included these infections. There is no currently documented clinical benefit for the use of CZA combination regimens rather than CZA monotherapy. CZA combined with aztreonam for serious infections due to MBL producers should be evaluated by randomized controlled trials.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=278552, CRD42021278552.

Antibiotic Therapy Strategies for Treating Gram-Negative Severe Infections in the Critically Ill: A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

Not enough data exist to inform the optimal duration and type of antimicrobial therapy against GN infections in critically ill patients.

METHODS

Narrative review based on a literature search through PubMed and Cochrane using the following keywords: "multi-drug resistant (MDR)", "extensively drug resistant (XDR)", "pan-drug-resistant (PDR)", "difficult-to-treat (DTR) Gram-negative infection," "antibiotic duration therapy", "antibiotic combination therapy" "antibiotic monotherapy" "Gram-negative bacteremia", "Gram-negative pneumonia", and "Gram-negative intra-abdominal infection".

RESULTS

Current literature data suggest adopting longer (≥10-14 days) courses of synergistic combination therapy due to the high global prevalence of ESBL-producing (45-50%), MDR (35%), XDR (15-20%), PDR (5.9-6.2%), and carbapenemases (CP)/metallo-β-lactamases (MBL)-producing (12.5-20%) Gram-negative (GN) microorganisms (i.e., Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumanii). On the other hand, shorter courses (≤5-7 days) of monotherapy should be limited to treating infections caused by GN with higher (≥3 antibiotic classes) antibiotic susceptibility. A general approach should be based on (i) third or further generation cephalosporins ± quinolones/aminoglycosides in the case of MDR-GN; (ii) carbapenems ± fosfomycin/aminoglycosides for extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs); and (iii) the association of old drugs with new expanded-spectrum β-lactamase inhibitors for XDR, PDR, and CP microorganisms. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in combination with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), bactericidal vs. bacteriostatic antibiotics, and the presence of resistance risk predictors (linked to patient, antibiotic, and microorganism) should represent variables affecting the antimicrobial strategies for treating GN infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the strategies of therapy described in the results, clinicians must remember that all treatment decisions are dynamic, requiring frequent reassessments depending on both the clinical and microbiological responses of the patient.

Polymyxin combination therapy for multidrug-resistant, extensively-drug resistant, and difficult-to-treat drug-resistant gram-negative infections: is it superior to polymyxin monotherapy?

INTRODUCTION

The increasing prevalence of infections with multidrug-resistant (MDR), extensively-drug resistant (XDR) or difficult-to-treat drug resistant (DTR) Gram-negative bacilli (GNB), including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter species, and Escherichia coli poses a severe challenge.

AREAS COVERED

The rapid growing of multi-resistant GNB as well as the considerable deceleration in development of new anti-infective agents have made polymyxins (e.g. polymyxin B and colistin) a mainstay in clinical practices as either monotherapy or combination therapy. However, whether the polymyxin-based combinations lead to better outcomes remains unknown. This review mainly focuses on the effect of polymyxin combination therapy versus monotherapy on treating GNB-related infections. We also provide several factors in designing studies and their impact on optimizing polymyxin combinations.

EXPERT OPINION

An abundance of recent in vitro and preclinical in vivo data suggest clinical benefit for polymyxin-drug combination therapies, especially colistin plus meropenem and colistin plus rifampicin, with synergistic killing against MDR, XDR, and DTR P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae and A. baumannii. The beneficial effects of polymyxin-drug combinations (e.g. colistin or polymyxin B + carbapenem against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii, polymyxin B + carbapenem + rifampin against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, and colistin + ceftolozan/tazobactam + rifampin against PDR-P. aeruginosa) have often been shown in clinical setting by retrospective studies. However, high-certainty evidence from large randomized controlled trials is necessary. These clinical trials should incorporate careful attention to patient's sample size, characteristics of patient's groups, PK/PD relationships and dosing, rapid detection of resistance, MIC determinations, and therapeutic drug monitoring.

Clinical Management of a Pandrug-Resistant OXA-48 Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Background: Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) is one of the serious forms of health care-associated infection. Pan-drug resistant (PDR) CRKP infections can cause severe infections. Mortality and treatment costs in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) are high. This study aims to share our experience regarding the treatment of oxacillinase (OXA)-48-positive PDR-CRKP infection in our 20-bed tertiary PICU with isolated rooms and 1 nurse for every 2-3 patients. Methods: Patient demographic characteristics, underlying diseases, previous infections, source of infection PDR-CRKP, treatment modalities, measures used, and outcomes were recorded. Findings: Eleven patients (eight men and three women) were found to have PDR OXA-48-positive CRKP. Because of the simultaneous detection of PDR-CRKP in three patients and the rapid spread of the disease, it was classified as a clinical outbreak, and strict infection control measures were taken. Combination therapy with double carbapenemase (meropenem and imipenem), amikacin, colistin, and tigecycline was used for treatment. The mean duration of treatment and isolation was 15.7 and 65.4 days, respectively. No treatment-related complication was observed, only one patient died, and the mortality rate was 9%. Conclusions: This severe clinical outbreak can be successfully treated with effective treatment with combined antibiotics and strict adherence to infection control measures. ClinicalTrial.gov ID: 28/01/2022 - 1/5.

Optimizing patient recruitment into clinical trials of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens

Recruitment of patients with critical priority antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria into drug approval randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has not been successful to date. Approaching from the viewpoint of clinician-investigators and learning from the experience of AMR-focused investigator-initiated trials, we present suggestions to improve feasibility and efficiency of RCTs evaluating patients with severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative or other AMR bacteria. Considerations address the trials' eligibility criteria, whether the focus of the trial is pathogen- or syndrome-targeted, trials' case report forms and monitoring, informed consent strategies for the recruitment of extremely ill patients, team dedication and incentives to run the trial and alternative trial designs. Evidence on the effects of new drugs against the AMR that these drugs target is weak and needs to be improved through better industry-academic collaboration, taking advantage of the different strengths of industry-led and investigator-initiated research.

Ten Years of KPC-Kp Bloodstream Infections Experience: Impact of Early Appropriate Empirical Therapy on Mortality

Background. In K. pneumoniae KPC (KPC-Kp) bloodstream infections (BSI), INCREMENT CPE score >7, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥3 and septic shock are recognized predictors of mortality, with a possible beneficial effect of combination therapy in seriously ill patients. Materials and Methods. We conducted a ten-year retrospective study including all KPC-Kp BSI in patients ≥18 years of age with the aim to evaluate the characteristics and impact of appropriate empirical therapy, either monotherapy or combination therapy, and targeted therapy on mortality. Appropriate therapy was defined as at least one active antimicrobial agent with in vitro activity against KPC-kp demonstrated by susceptibility testing, administered within 48 h from blood culture collection. Results. The median age of the 435 analyzed patients was 66.09 years (IQR 54.87−73.98). The median CCI was 4. KPC-Kp colonization was present in 324 patients (74.48%). The probable origin of the KPC-Kp BSI was not identified in 136 patients (31.26%), whereas in 120 (27.59%) patients, it was CVC-related, and in 118 (27.13%), it was respiratory. Source control was achieved in 87 patients (72.5%) with CVC-related KPC-Kp BSI. The twenty-eight-day survival was 70.45% for empirical monotherapy, 63.88% for empirical combination therapy and 57.05% for targeted therapy (p = 0.0399). A probable source of KPC-Kp BSI other than urinary, CVC or abdominal [aHR 1.64 (IC 1.15−2.34) p = 0.006] and deferred targeted therapy [HR 1.67 (IC 1.12−2.51), p= 0.013] emerged as predictors of mortality, whereas source control [HR 0.62 (IC 0.44−0.86), p = 0.005] and ceftazidime/avibactam administration in empirical therapy [aHR 0.37 (IC 0.20−0.68) p = 0.002] appeared as protective factors. Discussion. These data underline the importance of source control together with timing appropriateness in the early start of empirical therapy over the choice of monotherapy or combination therapy and the use of ceftazidime/avibactam against KPC-Kp BSI.

Antimicrobial treatment of monomicrobial phenotypic carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia: Two are better than one

BACKGROUNDS

Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) are emerging worldwide. The optimal treatment for CRKP infections is challenging for clinicians because therapeutic agents are greatly limited.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study of CRKP monomicrobial bacteremia was conducted at a medical center between 2010 and 2016. The use of at least one or more drugs with in vitro activity against the blood isolates was defined as appropriate combination therapy. The logistic regression model and propensity score analysis was used to assess clinical effects of therapeutic strategies. The 30-day crude mortality was the primary end point.

RESULTS

Two hundred and three patients were eligible and the 30-day mortality rate was 37.9% (77 patients). As compared with monotherapy, empirical (11.6 vs. 57.3%, p < .001) or definitive (26.5% vs. 48.6%, p = .001) combination antibiotic therapy showed a lower 30-day mortality rate independently. The propensity score analysis showed that those receiving combination therapy had less clinical (p ≤ .001) or microbiological failure (p = .003) and a lower 30-day mortality rate (p < .001). Among various regimens of definitive therapy, the 30-day mortality rate was the lowest among patients with appropriate combination therapy 23.6%, (p < .001; by log rank test). The primary outcome was similar in those with definitive carbapenem-containing and carbapenem-sparing combination regimens (p = .81). The presence or absence of carbapenemase production did not affect the mortality rate (p = .26).

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy, regardless of carbapenem-containing or carbapenem-sparing regimens, was associated with a favorable outcome.

Novel Antimicrobial Peptide “Octoprohibitin” against Multidrug Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Octoprohibitin is a synthetic antimicrobial peptide (AMP), derived from the prohibitin-2 gene of Octopus minor. It showed substantial activity against multidrug resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of 200 and 400 µg/mL, respectively. Time-kill kinetics and bacterial viability assays confirmed the concentration-dependent antibacterial activity of octoprohibitin against A. baumannii. The morphology and ultrastructure of A. baumannii were altered by treatment with octoprohibitin at the MIC and MBC levels. Furthermore, propidium iodide-fluorescein diacetate (PI-FDA) staining and 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H₂DCFDA) staining of octoprohibitin-treated A. baumannii revealed membrane permeability alterations and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, respectively. Agarose gel retardation results confirmed the DNA-binding ability of octoprohibitin to the genomic DNA of A. baumannii. Furthermore, octoprohibitin showed concentration-dependent inhibition of biofilm formation and eradication. The minimum biofilm inhibition concentration (MBIC) and minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) of octoprohibitin were 1000 and 1460 µg/mL, respectively. Octoprohibitin produced no significant cytotoxicity up to 800 µg/mL, and no hemolysis was observed up to 400 µg/mL. Furthermore, in vivo analysis in an A. baumannii-infected zebrafish model confirmed the effective bactericidal activity of octoprohibitin with higher cumulative survival percent (46.6%) and fewer pathological signs. Histological analysis showed reduced alterations in the gut, kidney, and gill tissues in the octoprohibitin-treated group compared with those in the phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-treated group. In conclusion, our results suggest that octoprohibitin is a potential antibacterial and antibiofilm agent against MDR A. baumannii.

Adjuvant antimicrobial activity and resensitization efficacy of geraniol in combination with antibiotics on Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates

Adjuvant use of geraniol, a plant essential oil component, is known to increase the efficacy of antibiotics by acting as a potent inhibitor of efflux mechanisms. In this study, we assessed the effect of a geraniol–antibiotic combination in 21 Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates consisting of high efflux (HE) and low efflux (LE) activity groups. We determined the MIC for geraniol and the four antibiotics and evaluated the adjuvant antimicrobial activity and resensitization efficacy of adjuvant geraniol. Geraniol–antibiotic combinations significantly reduced the MIC of all four antibiotics (P < 0.0001), and the fold change in MIC decreased by 4 to >256-fold for tigecycline, >16 to >4,096-fold for ceftazidime, 1 to >4,096-fold for cefepime, and >2 to >4096-fold for ciprofloxacin. Importantly, geraniol showed adjuvant antimicrobial activity and resensitization efficacy when used in combination with antibiotics in 21 A. baumannii clinical isolates. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the HE and LE groups. Low concentrations (0.125% and 0.0625%) of geraniol showed no cytotoxic or hemolytic activity. Our study shows that geraniol, acting as an antibiotic adjuvant, is a good candidate for in vivo studies of combination therapy for the treatment of MDR/XDR A. baumannii infections.

Synergistic Antimicrobial Effect of Colistin in Combination with Econazole against Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Its Persisters

Colistin is a last-line antibiotic which acts by causing membrane permeabilization in Gram-negative bacteria. However, its clinical value has been limited by its toxicity and the emergence of resistant organisms. In this study, we showed that econazole and colistin can act synergistically to produce a strong antimicrobial effect sufficient for eradication of starvation-induced tolerant and multidrug-resistant populations of Acinetobacter baumannii, a notorious pathogen causing recalcitrant infections, both in vitro and in mouse infection models. Investigation of the underlying mechanism showed that, while colistin disrupts the membrane structure, econazole causes the dissipation of proton motive force, eliciting a vicious cycle of membrane structural damages and disruption of membrane protein functions, and eventually cell death. This drug combination therefore achieves our goal of using a much smaller dosage of colistin to produce a much stronger antimicrobial effect to tackle the problems of toxicity and resistance associated with colistin usage. IMPORTANCE Findings described in this study constitute concrete evidence that it is possible to significantly enhance the antimicrobial activity of colistin by using an antifungal drug, econazole, as a colistin adjuvant. We showed that this drug combination can kill not only multidrug-resistant A. baumannii but also the tolerant subpopulation of such strains known as persisters, which may cause chronic and recurrent infections in clinical settings. The synergistic killing effect of the econazole and colistin combination was also observable in mouse infection models at a very low concentration, suggesting that such a drug combination has high potential to be used clinically. Findings in this study therefore have important implications for enhancing its clinical application potential as well as developing new approaches to enhance treatment effectiveness and reduce suffering in patients.

Polymyxin B/Tigecycline Combination vs. Polymyxin B or Tigecycline Alone for the Treatment of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae or Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Introduction

It is not clear whether polymyxin B/tigecycline (PMB/TGC) combination is better than PMB or TGC alone in the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms (CROs).

Methods

We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study in patients with HAP caused by CROs. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality, and the secondary outcomes included clinical success and the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to examine the relationship between antimicrobial treatments and 28-day mortality by adjusting other potential confounding factors.

Results

A total of 364 eligible patients were included in the final analysis, i.e., 99 in the PMB group, 173 in the TGC group, and 92 in the PMB/TGC combination group. The 28-day mortality rate was 28.3% (28/99) in the PMB group, 39.3% (68/173) in the TGC group, and 48.9% (45/92) in the PMB/TGC combination group (p = 0.014). The multivariate Cox regression model showed that there was a statistically significant lower risk of 28-day mortality among participants in the PMB group when compared with the PMB/TGC combination group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31–0.81, p = 0.004] and that participants in the TGC group had a lower risk of 28-day mortality than in the PMB/TGC combination group but without statistical significance. The incidence of AKI in the PMB group (52.5%) and the PMB/TGC combination group (53.3%) was significantly higher than that in the TGC group (33.5%, p = 0.001).

Conclusion

The appropriate PMB/TGC combination was not superior to appropriate PMB therapy in the treatment of HAP caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae/carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRE/CRAB) in terms of 28-day mortality.

The Role of Colistin in the Era of New β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

With the current crisis related to the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB), classical treatment approaches with so-called “old-fashion antibiotics” are generally unsatisfactory. Newly approved β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs) should be considered as the first-line treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infections. However, colistin can be prescribed for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections caused by CR-GNB by relying on its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Similarly, colistin can still be regarded as an alternative therapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) until new and effective agents are approved. Using colistin in combination regimens (i.e., including at least two in vitro active agents) can be considered in CRAB infections, and CRE infections with high risk of mortality. In conclusion, new BLBLIs have largely replaced colistin for the treatment of CR-GNB infections. Nevertheless, colistin may be needed for the treatment of CRAB infections and in the setting where the new BLBLIs are currently unavailable. In addition, with the advent of rapid diagnostic methods and novel antimicrobials, the application of personalized medicine has gained significant importance in the treatment of CRE infections.

Antimicrobial peptides, conventional antibiotics, and their synergistic utility for the treatment of drug-resistant infections

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), also known as host defense peptides (HDPs), are important effector immune defense molecules in multicellular organisms. AMPs exert their antimicrobial activities through several mechanisms; thus far, induction of drug resistance through AMPs has been regarded as unlikely. Therefore, they have great potential as new generation antimicrobial agents. To date, more than 30 AMP-related drugs are in the clinical trial phase. In recent years, studies show that some AMPs and conventional antibiotics have synergistic effects. The combined use of AMPs and antibiotics can kill drug-resistant pathogens, prevent drug resistance, and significantly improve the therapeutic effects of antibiotics. In this review, we discuss the progress in synergistic studies on AMPs and conventional antibiotics. An overview of the current understanding of the functional scope of AMPs, ongoing clinical trials, and challenges in the development processes are also presented.

Clinical management of severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria: a worldwide cross-sectional survey addressing the use of antibiotic combinations

OBJECTIVES

Optimal treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) infections is uncertain because of the lack of good-quality evidence and the limited effectiveness of available antibiotics. The aim of this survey was to investigate clinicians' prescribing strategies for treating CR-GNB infections worldwide.

METHODS

A 36-item questionnaire was developed addressing the following aspects of antibiotic prescribing: respondent's background, diagnostic and therapeutic availability, preferred antibiotic strategies and rationale for selecting combination therapy. Prescribers were recruited following the snowball sampling approach, and a post-stratification correction with inverse proportional weights was used to adjust the sample's representativeness.

RESULTS

A total of 1012 respondents from 95 countries participated in the survey. Overall, 298 (30%) of the respondents had local guidelines for treating CR-GNB at their facility and 702 (71%) had access to Infectious Diseases consultation, with significant discrepancies according to country economic status: 85% (390/502) in high-income countries versus 59% (194/283) in upper-medium-income countries and 30% (118/196) in lower-middle-income countries/lower-income-countries). Targeted regimens varied widely, ranging from 40 regimens for CR-Acinetobacter spp. to more than 100 regimens for CR-Enterobacteriaceae. Although the majority of respondents acknowledged the lack of evidence behind this choice, dual combination was the preferred treatment scheme and carbapenem-polymyxin was the most prescribed regimen, irrespective of pathogen and infection source. Respondents noticeably disagreed around the meaning of 'combination therapy' with 20% (150/783) indicating the simple addition of multiple compounds, 42% (321/783) requiring the presence of in vitro activity and 38% (290/783) requiring in vitro synergism.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of CR-GNB infections is far from being standardized. Strategic public health focused randomized controlled trials are urgently required to inform evidence-based treatment guidelines.

The role of combination therapy in the treatment of severe infections caused by carbapenem resistant gram-negatives: a systematic review of clinical studies

BACKGROUND

Effective treatment of sepsis due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) remains a challenge for clinicians worldwide. In recent years, the combination of antibiotics has become the preferred treatment strategy for CR-GNB infection. However, robust evidence to support this approach is lacking. This systematic review aimed at critically evaluating all available antibiotic options for CR-GNB sepsis with particular focus on combination.

METHODS

We systematically searched published literature from January 1945 until December 2018 for observational comparative and non-comparative studies and randomized trials examining any antibiotic option for CR-GNB. Studies were included if reporting microbiologically-confirmed infection caused by Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacteriaceae/Klebsiella spp., or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, reporting at least one of the study outcomes, and definitive antibiotic treatment. Carbapenem-resistance was defined as phenotypically-detected in vitro resistance to at least one of the following carbapenems: doripenem, ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem. Each antibiotic regimen was classified as "defined" when at least the molecular class(es) composing the regimen was detailed. Primary outcomes were 30-day and attributable mortality. Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) approach was selected for quantitative synthesis to explore feasibility of pooling data on antibiotic regimens.

RESULTS

A total of 6306 records were retrieved and 134 studies including 11,546 patients were included: 54 studies were on Acinetobacter, 52 on Enterobacteriaceae/Klebsiella, 21 on mixed Gram-negative, and 7 on Pseudomonas. Nine (7%) were RCTs; 19 prospective cohorts (14%), 89 (66%) retrospective, and 17 (13%) case series. Forty-one studies (31%) were multicentric. Qualitative synthesis showed an heterogeneous and scattered reporting of key-clinical and microbiological variables across studies. Ninety-two distinct antibiotic regimens were identified with 47 of them (51%, 5863 patients) not reporting any details on numbers, type, dosage and in vitro activity of the included antibiotic molecules. The NMAs could not be performed for any of the selected outcome given the presence of too many disconnected components.

CONCLUSION

The existing evidence is insufficient to allowing for the formulation of any evidence-based therapeutic recommendation for CR-GNB sepsis. Future studies must provide a standardized definition of antibiotic regimen to drive recommendations for using combination of antibiotics that can be reliably applied to clinical practice.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro efficacy of antibiotic combination therapy against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli

The superiority of combination therapy for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (CR-GNB) infections remains controversial. In vitro models may predict the efficacy of antibiotic regimens against CR-GNB. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed including pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) and time-kill (TK) studies examining the in vitro efficacy of antibiotic combinations against CR-GNB [PROSPERO registration no. CRD42019128104]. The primary outcome was in vitro synergy based on the effect size (ES): high, ES ≥ 0.75, moderate, 0.35 < ES < 0.75; low, ES ≤ 0.35; and absent, ES = 0). A network meta-analysis assessed the bactericidal effect and re-growth rate (secondary outcomes). An adapted version of the ToxRTool was used for risk-of-bias assessment. Over 180 combination regimens from 136 studies were included. The most frequently analysed classes were polymyxins and carbapenems. Limited data were available for ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam. High or moderate synergism was shown for polymyxin/rifampicin against Acinetobacter baumannii [ES = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-1.00], polymyxin/fosfomycin against Klebsiella pneumoniae (ES = 1.00, 95% CI 0.66-1.00) and imipenem/amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ES = 1.00, 95% CI 0.21-1.00). Compared with monotherapy, increased bactericidal activity and lower re-growth rates were reported for colistin/fosfomycin and polymyxin/rifampicin in K. pneumoniae and for imipenem/amikacin or imipenem/tobramycin against P. aeruginosa. High quality was documented for 65% and 53% of PK/PD and TK studies, respectively. Well-designed in vitro studies should be encouraged to guide the selection of combination therapies in clinical trials and to improve the armamentarium against carbapenem-resistant bacteria.

Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae-Implications for Treating Acute Leukemias, a Subgroup of Hematological Malignancies

Acute leukemias (AL) are a group of aggressive malignant diseases associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality. Patients with AL are highly susceptible to infectious diseases due to the disease itself, factors attributed to treatment, and specific individual risk factors. Enterobacteriaceae presence (e.g., Klebsiella pneumonia and Escherichia coli) is a frequent cause of bloodstream infections in AL patients. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) is an emerging health problem worldwide; however, the incidence of CRE varies greatly between different regions. Carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae is caused by different mechanisms, and CRE may display various resistance profiles. Bacterial co-expression of genes conferring resistance to both broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics (including carbapenems) and other classes of antibiotics may give rise to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). The spread of CRE represents a major treatment challenge for clinicians due to lack of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), a limited number of antibiotics available, and the side-effects associated with them. Most research concerning CRE infections in AL patients are limited to case reports and retrospective reviews. Current research recommends treatment with older antibiotics, such as polymyxins, fosfomycin, older aminoglycosides, and in some cases carbapenems. To prevent the spread of resistant microbes, it is of pivotal interest to implement antibiotic stewardship to reduce broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment, but without giving too narrow a treatment to neutropenic infected patients.

Targeting tumour necrosis factor to ameliorate viral pneumonia

Pneumonia is a serious complication associated with inflammation of the lungs due to infection with viral pathogens. Seasonal and pandemic influenza viruses, variola virus (agent of smallpox) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2; agent of COVID-19) are some leading examples. Viral pneumonia is triggered by excessive inflammation associated with dysregulated cytokine production, termed 'cytokine storm'. Several cytokines have been implicated but tumour necrosis factor (TNF) plays a critical role in driving lung inflammation, severe lung pathology and death. Despite this, the exact role TNF plays in the aetiology and pathogenesis of virus infection-induced respiratory complications is not well understood. In this review, we discuss the pathological and immunomodulatory roles of TNF in contributing to immunopathology and resolution of lung inflammation, respectively, in mouse models of influenza- and smallpox (mousepox)-induced pneumonia. We review studies that have investigated dampening of inflammation on the outcome of severe influenza and orthopoxvirus infections. Most studies on the influenza model have evaluated the efficacy of treatment with anti-inflammatory drugs, including anti-TNF agents, in animal models on the day of viral infection. We question the merits of those studies as they are not transferable to the clinic given that individuals generally present at a hospital only after the onset of disease symptoms and not on the day of infection. We propose that research should be directed at determining whether dampening lung inflammation after the onset of disease symptoms will reduce morbidity and mortality. Such a treatment strategy will be more relevant clinically.

Cost-effectiveness of antimicrobial treatment for inpatients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection: a systematic review of economic evidence

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of antimicrobial therapy for patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection.

INTRODUCTION

Among the main multi-resistant microorganisms, carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae is responsible for the mortality of 40% of patients following 30 days of infection. Treatment for carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infection entails the use of high-cost antimicrobials. Inappropriate use of antimicrobials can increase the cost of treatment fourfold. This review aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of antimicrobial therapy treatment for patients with carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infection to better inform decision making in hospital services.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

The review included studies on participants 18 years or over with carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infection who had undergone antimicrobial therapy in hospital and acute care services. Studies that compared the cost-effectiveness of different antimicrobial therapy for carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infection were included. Outcome measures were cost per unit of effect expressed in clinical outcome units; this included cost per avoided death, cost per prevention of sepsis and cost per duration of stay. Economic studies with a cost-effectiveness design were considered, as well as modeling studies.

METHODS

A three-step search strategy was utilized to locate studies published in English, Spanish or Portuguese, with no date restrictions. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts and the full texts of potentially relevant studies for eligibility. Methodological quality was assessed by two independent reviewers using the JBI critical appraisal checklist for economic evaluations. Data were extracted from included studies using the standardized JBI data extraction tool. Data were synthesized using narrative, tables and the JBI Dominance Ranking Matrix.

RESULTS

This review identified eight studies that evaluated the cost-effectiveness of different treatments for carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infection. The results of this study demonstrated that there was no gold standard treatment for carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infection, hence treatment was generally directed by colonization pressure and resistance profiles. Furthermore, due to the moderate quality and limited number of studies, there was high uncertainty of the values of the cost-effectiveness ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

Ofloxacin appears to be the most cost-effective treatment; however, conclusions are limited due to the small number and low quality of studies.

PEG-8 Laurate Fermentation of Staphylococcus epidermidis Reduces the Required Dose of Clindamycin Against Cutibacterium acnes

The probiotic activity of skin Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) bacteria can elicit diverse biological functions via the fermentation of various carbon sources. Here, we found that polyethylene glycol (PEG)-8 Laurate, a carbon-rich molecule, can selectively induce the fermentation of S. epidermidis, not Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes), a bacterium associated with acne vulgaris. The PEG-8 Laurate fermentation of S. epidermidis remarkably diminished the growth of C. acnes and the C. acnes-induced production of pro-inflammatory macrophage-inflammatory protein 2 (MIP-2) cytokines in mice. Fermentation media enhanced the anti-C. acnes activity of a low dose (0.1%) clindamycin, a prescription antibiotic commonly used to treat acne vulgaris, in terms of the suppression of C. acnes colonization and MIP-2 production. Furthermore, PEG-8 Laurate fermentation of S. epidermidis boosted the activity of 0.1% clindamycin to reduce the sizes of C. acnes colonies. Our results demonstrated, for the first time, that the PEG-8 Laurate fermentation of S. epidermidis displayed the adjuvant effect on promoting the efficacy of low-dose clindamycin against C. acnes. Targeting C. acnes by lowering the required doses of antibiotics may avoid the risk of creating drug-resistant C. acnes and maintain the bacterial homeostasis in the skin microbiome, leading to a novel modality for the antibiotic treatment of acne vulgaris.

Infections Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Bacteria in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies

In developed countries, hematological malignancies (HM) account for 8 to 10% of cancers diagnosed annually and one-third of patients with HM (HMP) are expected to die from their disease. The former wide spectrum “magic bullet,” imipenem, has been ousted by the emergence of carbapenem resistant (CR) pathogens. In endemic areas, infections with CR-bacteria occur in vulnerable patients, notably in HMP, who suffer from high mortality related to infectious complications. In this work, we reviewed epidemiologic and clinical factors associated with CR-infections in adult HMP and data on CR-related mortality and antibiotic treatments in this population. We found that resistance profile of strains involved in HMP infections, mainly bacteremia, reflect local epidemiology. Significant risk factors for infections with CR-bacteria include sex male, age around 50 years old, acute leukemia, selvage chemotherapy, neutropenia, and digestive colonization by CR-bacteria. Mortality rate is high in HMP infected with CR-Enterobacteriaceae, more particularly in case of acute myeloid leukemia and unresolved neutropenia, due to inappropriate empiric management and delayed administration of targeted antibiotics, such as tigecycline, colistin, or new associations of active drugs. Thus, we developed an algorithm for clinicians, assessing the incremental risk for CR-bacterial infection occurrence and mortality in febrile HMP, to guide decisions related to empirical therapeutic strategies.

Investigation of the In Vitro Effectiveness of Aztreonam/Avibactam, Colistin/Apramycin, and Meropenem/Apramycin Combinations Against Carbapenemase-Producing, Extensively Drug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Strains

This study aimed at investigating the in vitro effectiveness of aztreonam/avibactam, colistin/avibactam, colistin/apramycin, and meropenem/apramycin combinations against carbapenemase-producing, extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Klebsiella pneumoniae strains. This study evaluated 38 carbapenem-resistant, carbapenemase-producing, and XDR K. pneumoniae strains. The checkerboard method was used to examine the efficacy of aztreonam/avibactam, and meropenem/apramycin combinations in all strains and the colistin/apramycin combination in colistin-resistant strains (n = 26). It was found that when used alone, aztreonam and avibactam had high minimum inhibitory concentration values in all strains and that all strains were resistant to aztreonam. Nevertheless, the aztreonam/avibactam combination was found to have a synergistic effect against all strains. Apramycin alone was effective against 30 K. pneumoniae strains (79%); however, 8 strains (21%) were found to be resistant. In the synergy testing of 26 colistin-resistant strains with the checkerboard method, the colistin/apramycin combination was found to have a synergistic effect against 4 strains (15.3%), an antagonistic effect against 8 strains (30.7%), and an additive effect against 14 strains (54%). By comparison, the meropenem/apramycin combination had a synergistic effect against 20 strains (52%) and an additive effect against 12 strains (31%). The aztreonam/avibactam combination showed a high in vitro synergistic effect on carbapenemase-producing and XDR K. pneumoniae strains, such as Metallo-β-lactamase, and provided good prospects for the successful treatment. The meropenem/apramycin combination was also highly synergistic. The synergistic effects were low for the colistin/apramycin combination that was tested on colistin-resistant strains. However, it is promising that apramycin has low minimal inhibitory concentration values.

Colistin plus meropenem for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections: in vitro synergism is not associated with better clinical outcomes

OBJECTIVES

In vitro models showing synergism between polymyxins and carbapenems support combination treatment for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative (CRGN) infections. We tested the association between the presence of in vitro synergism and clinical outcomes in patients treated with colistin plus meropenem.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of AIDA, a randomized controlled trial comparing colistin with colistin-meropenem for severe CRGN infections. We tested in vitro synergism using a checkerboard assay. Based on the fractional inhibitory concentration (ΣFIC) index for each colistin-meropenem combination, we categorized results as synergistic, antagonistic or additive/indifferent. The primary outcome was clinical failure at 14 days. Secondary outcomes were 14- and 28-day mortality and microbiological failure.

RESULTS

The sample included 171 patients with infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 131), Enterobacteriaceae (n = 37) and Pseudomonas aeuruginosa (n = 3). In vitro testing showed synergism for 73 isolates, antagonism for 20 and additivism/indifference for 78. In patients who received any colistin plus meropenem, clinical failure at 14 days was 59/78 (75.6%) in the additivism/indifference group (reference category), 54/73 (74.0%) in the synergism group (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.76, 95% CI 0.31-1.83), and 11/20 (55%) in the antagonism group (aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.22-2.73). There was no significant difference between groups for any secondary outcome. Comparing the synergism group to patients treated with colistin monotherapy, synergism was not protective against 14-day clinical failure (aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.26-1.04) or 14-day mortality (aOR1.09, 95% CI 0.60-1.96).

DISCUSSION

In vitro synergism between colistin and meropenem via checkerboard method did not translate into clinical benefit.

Calculated parenteral initial treatment of bacterial infections: Infections with multi-resistant Gram-negative rods - ESBL producers, carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

This is the sixteenth chapter of the guideline "Calculated initial parenteral treatment of bacterial infections in adults - update 2018" in the 2nd updated version. The German guideline by the Paul-Ehrlich-Gesellschaft für Chemotherapie e.V. (PEG) has been translated to address an international audience. Infections due to multiresistant Gram-negative rods are challenging. In this chapter recommendations for targeted therapy for infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii are given, based on the limited available evidence.

International Consensus Guidelines for the Optimal Use of the Polymyxins: Endorsed by the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP), European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID), Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), International Society for Anti-infective Pharmacology (ISAP), Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP)

The polymyxin antibiotics colistin (polymyxin E) and polymyxin B became available in the 1950s and thus did not undergo contemporary drug development procedures. Their clinical use has recently resurged, assuming an important role as salvage therapy for otherwise untreatable gram-negative infections. Since their reintroduction into the clinic, significant confusion remains due to the existence of several different conventions used to describe doses of the polymyxins, differences in their formulations, outdated product information, and uncertainties about susceptibility testing that has led to lack of clarity on how to optimally utilize and dose colistin and polymyxin B. We report consensus therapeutic guidelines for agent selection and dosing of the polymyxin antibiotics for optimal use in adult patients, as endorsed by the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP), Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), International Society of Anti-Infective Pharmacology (ISAP), Society for Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP). The European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) endorses this document as a consensus statement. The overall conclusions in the document are endorsed by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). We established a diverse international expert panel to make therapeutic recommendations regarding the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the drugs and pharmacokinetic targets, polymyxin agent selection, dosing, dosage adjustment and monitoring of colistin and polymyxin B, use of polymyxin-based combination therapy, intrathecal therapy, inhalation therapy, toxicity, and prevention of renal failure. The treatment guidelines provide the first ever consensus recommendations for colistin and polymyxin B therapy that are intended to guide optimal clinical use.

Treatment Outcome of Bacteremia Due to Non-Carbapenemase-producing Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Bacteremia: Role of Carbapenem Combination Therapy

PURPOSE

Infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae are emerging causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Optimal treatment for non-carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant K pneumoniae (nCP-CRKP) bacteremia remains undefined. The goal of this study was to assess the clinical outcome, predictors of mortality, and therapeutic strategy of carbapenems for nCP-CRKP bacteremia.

METHODS

A retrospective study of monomicrobial bacteremia caused by nCP-CRKP, at a medical center between 2010 and 2015 was conducted. CRKP which was defined as a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ≥ 2 for ertapenem or ≥ 4 mg/L for meropenem, or imipenem. Multiplex polymerase chain was applied to detect carbapenemase genes. The patients definitively treated with combination therapy were compared with monotherapy using a propensity score-matched analysis to assess therapeutic effectiveness. The primary end point was the 30-day crude mortality and clinical prognostic factors were assessed.

FINDINGS

Overall 171 patients met criteria were eligible for the study and their overall 30-day mortality rate was 38.6%. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that combination therapy was associated with a lower 30-day mortality rate (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.11; 95% CI, 0.03-0.43; P = 0.001) and less clinical (aOR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.08-0.58; P = 0.003) and microbiologic (aOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19-0.71; P = 0.003) failure. However, the 30-day mortality rate in the cases infected by a pathogen with a meropenem MIC ≤8 mg/L receiving carbapenem-containing or carbapenem-sparing combination regimens was similar (15 of 58 [25.9%] vs 5 of 20 [23.3%]; P = 1.0).

IMPLICATIONS

Combination therapy, regardless of carbapenem-containing or carbapenem-sparing, with one or more active agents improved survival more than monotherapy and was more effective in patients with critical illness. (Clin Ther. 2020; 42:XXX-XXX) © 2020 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc.

Epidermal growth factor vs platelet-rich plasma: Activity against chronic wound microbiota

The objective was to evaluate Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonisation of wounds treated with recombinant epidermal growth factor (EGF) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP); to analyse the susceptibility profiles of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa isolates from wounds treated with EGF and PRP; and to describe the presence of infection in EGF-treated and PRP-treated wounds. Experimental study was performed using clinical specimens collected with swabs. Patients were treated with PRP and EGF in the outpatient clinic of a university hospital. Forty-three isolates were obtained from 31 patients, 41.9% (13/31) of whom had been treated with EGF and 58.0% (18/31) with PRP. Ten of the 43 isolates were identified as S. aureus, 60.0% (6/10) of which were isolated from PRP-treated wounds. Among the 33 P. aeruginosa isolates, 66.6% (22/33) were isolated from PRP-treated wounds. Regarding antimicrobial susceptibility, only one strain isolated from an EGF-treated wound was identified as methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Among the P. aeruginosa isolates, one obtained from a patient treated with EGF was multidrug-resistant. Patients treated with EGF had no infections during the follow-up period, and there was a significant difference between the 1st and 12th week in wound infection improvement in patients treated with PRP (P = .0078).

In vivo efficacy of combination of colistin with fosfomycin or minocycline in a mouse model of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia

Unfortunately, the options for treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) infections are extremely limited. Recently, fosfomycin and minocycline were newly introduced as a treatment option for MDR A. baumannii infection. Therefore, we investigated the efficacy of the combination of colistin with fosfomycin and minocycline, respectively, as therapeutic options in MDR A. baumannii pneumonia. We examined a carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii isolated from clinical specimens at Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea. The effect of colistin with fosfomycin, and colistin with minocycline on the bacterial counts in lung tissue was investigated in a mouse model of pneumonia caused by MDR A. baumannii. In vivo, colistin with fosfomycin or minocycline significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the bacterial load in the lungs compared with the controls at 24 and 48 h. In the combination groups, the bacterial loads differed significantly (p < 0.05) from that with the more active antimicrobial alone. Moreover, the combination regimens of colistin with fosfomycin and colistin with minocycline showed bactericidal and synergistic effects compared with the more active antimicrobial alone at 24 and 48 h. This study demonstrated the synergistic effects of combination regimens of colistin with fosfomycin and minocycline, respectively, as therapeutic options in pneumonia caused by MDR A. baumannii.

Advances in the therapy of bacterial bloodstream infections

BACKGROUND

Advances in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) have been achieved in the last years, improving clinical outcome. However, mortality associated with some pathogens, such as Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp., is still high. In addition, the spread of antibiotic resistance, mainly among Gram-negative bacteria, reduces treatment options in some circumstances. Therefore, interest in new drugs, combination regimens and optimal dosing schedules is rising.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim is to summarize the current evidence on available antibiotic regimens for patients with bacterial BSI, focusing on drug choice, combination regimens and optimal dosing schedules. We selected bacteria that are difficult to manage because of virulence factors (i.e. methicillin-susceptible S. aureus), tolerance to antibiotic activity (i.e. Enterococcus faecalis), and/or susceptibility patterns (i.e. methicillin-resistant S. aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii).

SOURCES

MEDLINE search with English language and publication in the last 5 years as limits.

CONTENT AND IMPLICATIONS

The literature gaps on the use of new drugs, the uncertainties regarding the use of combination regimens, and the need to optimize dosing schedules in some circumstances (e.g. augmented renal clearance, renal replacement therapy, high inoculum BSI sources, and isolation of bacteria showing high MICs) have been revised.

Monotherapy versus combination therapy for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Infections caused by carbapenemase-producing, multidrug-resistant (MDR), or extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacteria constitute a major therapeutic challenge. Whether combination antibiotic therapy is superior to monotherapy remains unknown. In this systematic review and meta-analysis OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies published by December 2016 comparing mono- with combination antibiotic therapy for infections with carbapenemase-producing, MDR, or XDR Gram-negative bacteria. Mortality and clinical cure rates served as primary and secondary outcome measures, respectively. Of 8847 initially identified studies, 53 studies - covering pneumonia (n = 10 studies), blood stream (n = 15), osteoarticular (n = 1), and mixed infections (n = 27) - were included. 41% (n = 1848) of patients underwent monotherapy, and 59% (n = 2666) combination therapy. In case series/cohort studies (n = 45) mortality was lower with combination- vs. monotherapy (RR 0.83, CI 0.73-0.93, p = 0.002, I2 = 24%). Subgroup analysis revealed lower mortality with combination therapy with at least two in-vitro active antibiotics, in blood stream infections, and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. No mortality difference was seen in case-control studies (n = 6) and RCTs (n = 2). Cure rates did not differ regardless of study type. The two included RCTs had a high and unknown risk of bias, respectively. 16.7% (1/6) of case-control studies and 37.8% (17/45) of cases series/cohort studies were of good quality, whereas quality was poor in the remaining studies. In conclusion, combination antimicrobial therapy of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria appears to be superior to monotherapy with regard to mortality.

Use of meropenem in treating carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections

Introduction: The epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) is increasingly worldwide. Production of carbapenemases is the most common and efficient mechanism of carbapenem resistance, and could theoretically be overcome by optimizing the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) behavior of meropenem. Areas covered: This article overviews the available literature concerning the potential role that meropenem may still have in the treatment carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections. Clinical studies published in English language until June 2019 were searched on PubMed database. Expert commentary: High-dose continuous infusion meropenem-based combination regimens could still represent a valuable option for treating CRE infections in specific circumstances. Knowledge of the local prevalent mechanisms of carbapenem resistance, of patient clinical severity, of the site of infection, of an accurate minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value, coupled with the possibility of carrying-out a real-time therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-based PK/PD optimization of drug exposure must all be considered as fundamental for properly pursuing this goal.

Antibiotic combinations that exploit heteroresistance to multiple drugs effectively control infection

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria are a significant threat to human health, with one estimate suggesting they will cause 10 million worldwide deaths per year by 2050, surpassing deaths due to cancer1. Because new antibiotic development can take a decade or longer, it is imperative to effectively use currently available drugs. Antibiotic combination therapy offers promise for treating highly resistant bacterial infections, but the factors governing the sporadic efficacy of such regimens have remained unclear. Dogma suggests that antibiotics ineffective as monotherapy can be effective in combination2. Here, using carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) clinical isolates, we reveal the underlying basis for the majority of effective combinations to be heteroresistance. Heteroresistance is a poorly understood mechanism of resistance reported for different classes of antibiotics3-6 in which only a subset of cells are phenotypically resistant7. Within an isolate, the subpopulations resistant to different antibiotics were distinct, and over 88% of CRE isolates exhibited heteroresistance to multiple antibiotics ('multiple heteroresistance'). Combinations targeting multiple heteroresistance were efficacious, whereas those targeting homogenous resistance were ineffective. Two pan-resistant Klebsiella isolates were eradicated by combinations targeting multiple heteroresistance, highlighting a rational strategy to identify effective combinations that employs existing antibiotics and could be clinically implemented immediately.

Meta-analysis of Polymyxin Use in Patients

In this chapter, we systematically reviewed studies that assessed polymyxin's effectiveness and summarized results through meta-analysis. The outcomes addressed were all-cause mortality, assuming that for patients with severe multidrug-resistant infections survival is the most important outcome, and resistance development, important for future patients. Most clinical data on polymyxins in the literature are from retrospective, observational studies at high risk of bias. The majority of clinical studies were unpowered to examine mortality controlling for other risk factors. The studies had no control of dosage regimens and treatment modifications. We identified several areas of missing data, in particular randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, different dosage regimens, polymyxins versus alternative antibiotics (e.g. aminoglycosides, tigecycline), and monotherapy versus specific combination therapies. Ideally, mortality and development of resistance should be examined in RCTs, with further longitudinal studies required for the latter.

Efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam in monotherapy or combination therapy against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: A meta-analysis

Clinicians may use ceftazidime/avibactam in combination with other active agents to treat infections due to carbapenem-resistant organisms, although no conclusive data support this practice. This meta-analysis compared the efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam as monotherapy or combination therapy against infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPa). An online literature search was conducted to identify observational studies published as full papers and indexed up to February 2019 comparing the efficacy, in terms of mortality and microbiological cure rates, of ceftazidime/avibactam monotherapy or combination therapy with other active agents for infections due to CRE or CRPa. The relative risk (RR) of mortality and microbiological eradication was estimated based on pooled data from all eligible studies. Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis accounting for 396 subjects, of whom 202 received combination therapy. The mortality rate was 38.1% for combination therapy and 30.9% for monotherapy (RR = 1.18, 95% CI 0.88-1.58; P = 0.259). Similarly, no difference was found between the two groups when analysing the rate of microbiological cure (64.9% for combination therapy vs. 63.4% for monotherapy; RR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.85-1.28, P = 0.705). Moreover, no difference was observed for both outcomes when patients infected with P. aeruginosa were excluded from the analysis. This meta-analysis suggests that use of ceftazidime/avibactam in monotherapy or combination therapy for infections due to CRE or CRPa could show a similar effect on mortality and microbiological cure rates. Studies on larger samples are needed to address this important issue.

Challenges and research priorities to progress the impact of antimicrobial stewardship

Antimicrobial stewardship programmes have been playing an important role in patient care and hospital policies. These programmes are now recognised as formal strategies for curbing the upward trend in antibiotic resistance and for improving the appropriate antimicrobial and antifungal use. The role of such programs in the era of antimicrobial resistance presents several unique challenges and opportunities, most notably in the diagnostic and therapeutic setting. Controversies remain regarding the most effective interventions and the appropriate design to evaluate their impact. In this review, based on rounds of discussion, we explain the most important challenges faced by antibiotic stewardship and antifungal stewardship programmes. We also try to suggest areas for further research.