Assessing novel partner antimicrobials to protect ceftriaxone against gonococcal resistance: An in vitro evaluation

BACKGROUND

The emergence of ceftriaxone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae poses a significant threat to existing treatment regimens. Our study aimed to assess the efficacy of antimicrobials that could be combined with ceftriaxone to reduce the probability of ceftriaxone resistance emerging and spreading in N. gonorrhoeae.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Broth microdilution was used to determine the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for a panel of ceftriaxone-resistant (WHO X, Y, Z) and ceftriaxone-susceptible (WHO L, N, P) N. gonorrhoeae WHO reference strains for the following antimicrobials: ceftriaxone, doxycycline, azithromycin, zoliflodacin, fosfomycin, pristinamycin, ramoplanin, gentamicin and NAI-107. The MICs for zoliflodacin and pristinamycin for all strains were lower than or equal to the available breakpoints. A checkerboard assay was used to determine the drug-drug combination effect, which showed either an indifferent or an additive effect for all the combinations tested with ceftriaxone.

CONCLUSIONS

The low MICs of zoliflodacin and pristinamycin for the three ceftriaxone-resistant strains suggest that these antimicrobials could be used as partner drugs with ceftriaxone to reduce the probability of ceftriaxone resistance spreading in areas with a high prevalence of ceftriaxone resistance.

Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles from Cassia Auriculata: Targeting antibacterial, antioxidant activity, and evaluation of their possible effects on saltwater microcrustacean, Artemia Nauplii (non-target organism)

Due to their huge surface area to volume ratio, metallic nanoparticles are becoming increasingly important in numerous spheres of life. Here, initially, we aimed to evaluate the potential use of Cassia auriculata (CA) extract to synthesize silver nanoparticles (AgNPs). Then, we evaluated its antimicrobial potential and antioxidant capacity, as well as performed in silico analysis, and investigated the possible non-toxic effect of AgNPs on Artemia nauplii. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM/TEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDX), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and dynamic light scattering (DLS) studies were used to characterize the biosynthesized AgNPs. Our data indicate that Bacillus cereus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Staphylococcus aureus bacteria were susceptible to the biosynthesized AgNPs, whose effect was concentration-response. With a ZOI of 10 mm, the AgNPs were most efficient against gram-positive B. cereus bacteria at the highest concentration (75 μg/mL). The biosynthesized AgNPs (at 25 to 125 μg/mL) showed good antioxidant activity in the DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate) and FRAP (ferric reducing antioxidant power) assays. Oleanolic acid from CA exhibited strong binding affinity and high binding energy to E. coli and B. cereus (-9.66 and - 9.74 kcal/mol) on in silico research. According to the comparative non-toxicity analysis, AgNPs, AgNO₃, and CA bark extract had the least toxic effects on A. nauplii, with respective mortality rates of 28.14, 32.26, and 38.42 %, respectively. In conclusion, the current work showed that AgNPs produced from CA bark could be a promising material for diverse applications.

Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Human Commensal Neisseria Species

Pathogenic Neisseria gonorrhoeae causes the sexually transmitted infection gonorrhea. N. gonorrhoeae has evolved high levels of antimicrobial resistance (AR) leading to therapeutic failures even in dual-therapy treatment with azithromycin and ceftriaxone. AR mechanisms can be acquired by genetic transfer from closely related species, such as naturally competent commensal Neisseria species. At present, little is known about the antimicrobial resistance profiles of commensal Neisseria. Here, we characterized the phenotypic resistance profile of four commensal Neisseria species (N. lactamica, N. cinerea, N. mucosa, and N. elongata) against 10 commonly used antibiotics, and compared their profiles to 4 N. gonorrhoeae strains, using disk diffusion and minimal inhibitory concentration assays. Overall, we observed that 3 of the 4 commensals were more resistant to several antibiotics than pathogenic N. gonorrhoeae strains. Next, we compared publicly available protein sequences of known AR genes, including penicillin-binding-protein 2 (PBP2) from commensals and N. gonorrhoeae strains. We found mutations in PBP2 known to confer resistance in N. gonorrhoeae also present in commensal Neisseria sequences. Our results suggest that commensal Neisseria have unexplored antibiotic resistance gene pools that may be exchanged with pathogenic N. gonorrhoeae, possibly impairing drug development and clinical treatment.

Background review for the '2020 European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults'

Gonorrhoea is a major public health concern globally. Increasing incidence and sporadic ceftriaxone-resistant cases, including treatment failures, are growing concerns. The 2020 European gonorrhoea guideline provides up-to-date evidence-based guidance regarding the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea. The updates and recommendations emphasize significantly increasing gonorrhoea incidence; broad indications for increased testing with validated and quality-assured nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) and culture; dual antimicrobial therapy including high-dose ceftriaxone and azithromycin (ceftriaxone 1 g plus azithromycin 2 g) OR ceftriaxone 1 g monotherapy (ONLY in well-controlled settings, see guideline for details) for uncomplicated gonorrhoea when the antimicrobial susceptibility is unknown; recommendation of test of cure (TOC) in all gonorrhoea cases to ensure eradication of infection and identify resistance; and enhanced surveillance of treatment failures when recommended treatment regimens have been used. Improvements in access to appropriate testing, test performance, diagnostics, antimicrobial susceptibility surveillance and treatment, and follow-up of gonorrhoea patients are essential in controlling gonorrhoea and to mitigate the emergence and/or spread of ceftriaxone resistance and multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant gonorrhoea. This review provides the detailed background, evidence base and discussions, for the 2020 European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults (Unemo M, et al. Int J STD AIDS. 2020).

2020 European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults

Gonorrhoea is a major public health concern globally. Increasing incidence and sporadic ceftriaxone-resistant cases, including treatment failures, are growing concerns. The 2020 European gonorrhoea guideline provides up-to-date evidence-based guidance regarding the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea. The updates and recommendations emphasize significantly increasing gonorrhoea incidence; broad indications for increased testing with validated and quality-assured nucleic acid amplification tests and culture; dual antimicrobial therapy including high-dose ceftriaxone and azithromycin (ceftriaxone 1 g plus azithromycin 2 g) OR ceftriaxone 1 g monotherapy (ONLY in well-controlled settings, see guideline for details) for uncomplicated gonorrhoea when the antimicrobial susceptibility is unknown; recommendation of test of cure (TOC) in all gonorrhoea cases to ensure eradication of infection and identify resistance; and enhanced surveillance of treatment failures when recommended treatment regimens have been used. Improvements in access to appropriate testing, test performance, diagnostics, antimicrobial susceptibility surveillance and treatment, and follow-up of gonorrhoea patients are essential in controlling gonorrhoea and to mitigate the emergence and/or spread of ceftriaxone resistance and multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant gonorrhoea. For detailed background, evidence base and discussions, see the background review for the present 2020 European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults (Unemo M, et al. Int J STD AIDS. 2020).

Gentamicin as an alternative to ceftriaxone in the treatment of gonorrhoea: the G-TOG non-inferiority RCT

BACKGROUND

Gonorrhoea is a common sexually transmitted infection that can cause pain and discomfort, affect fertility in women and lead to epididymo-orchitis in men. Current treatment is with ceftriaxone, but there is increasing evidence of antimicrobial resistance reducing its effectiveness. Gentamicin is a potential alternative treatment requiring further evaluation.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of gentamicin as an alternative treatment to ceftriaxone in the treatment of gonorrhoea.

DESIGN

A multicentre, parallel-group, blinded, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Fourteen sexual health clinics in England.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults aged 16-70 years with a diagnosis of uncomplicated, untreated genital, pharyngeal or rectal gonorrhoea based on a positive Gram-stained smear on microscopy or a positive nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT).

RANDOMISATION AND BLINDING

Participants were randomised using a secure web-based system, stratified by clinic. Participants, investigators and research staff assessing participants were blinded to treatment allocation.

INTERVENTIONS

Allocation was to either 240 mg of gentamicin (intervention) or 500 mg of ceftriaxone (standard treatment), both administered as a single intramuscular injection. All participants also received 1 g of oral azithromycin.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary outcome measure was clearance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae at all infected sites, confirmed by a negative Aptima Combo 2® (Hologic Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA) NAAT, at 2 weeks post treatment.

RESULTS

We randomised 720 participants, of whom 81% were men. There were 358 participants in the gentamicin group and 362 in the ceftriaxone group; 292 (82%) and 306 (85%) participants, respectively, were included in the primary analysis. Non-inferiority of gentamicin to ceftriaxone could not be demonstrated [adjusted risk difference for microbiological clearance -6.4%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -10.4% to -2.4%]. Clearance of genital infection was similar in the two groups, at 94% in the gentamicin group and 98% in the ceftriaxone group, but clearance of pharyngeal infection and rectal infection was lower in the gentamicin group (80% vs. 96% and 90% vs. 98%, respectively). Reported pain at the injection site was higher for gentamicin than for ceftriaxone. The side-effect profiles were comparable between the groups. Only one serious adverse event was reported and this was deemed not to be related to the trial medication. The economic analysis found that treatment with gentamicin is not cost neutral compared with standard care, with average patient treatment costs higher for those allocated to gentamicin (£13.90, 95% CI £2.47 to £37.34) than to ceftriaxone (£6.72, 95% CI £1.36 to £17.84).

LIMITATIONS

Loss to follow-up was 17% but was similar in both treatment arms. Twelve per cent of participants had a negative NAAT for gonorrhoea at their baseline visit but this was balanced between treatment groups and unlikely to have biased the trial results.

CONCLUSIONS

The trial was unable to demonstrate non-inferiority of gentamicin compared with ceftriaxone in the clearance of gonorrhoea at all infected sites. Clearance at pharyngeal and rectal sites was lower for participants allocated to gentamicin than for those allocated to ceftriaxone, but was similar for genital sites in both groups. Gentamicin was associated with more severe injection site pain. However, both gentamicin and ceftriaxone appeared to be well tolerated.

FUTURE WORK

Exploration of the genetic determinants of antibiotic resistance in N. gonorrhoeae will help to identify accurate markers of decreased susceptibility. Greater understanding of the immune response to infection can assist gonococcal vaccine development.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN51783227.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 20. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Evaluation of alternative antibiotics for susceptibility of gonococcal isolates from China

The efficacy of the currently recommended first-line treatments for gonococcal infections - ceftriaxone monotherapy or ceftriaxone/azithromycin dual therapy - is waning rapidly, and efficient alternative antimicrobials are needed urgently to ensure that future treatment of gonorrhoea remains available. As such, the aim of this study was to screen alternative clinically approved antimicrobials for in-vitro activity against Neisseria gonorrhoeae. The susceptibility levels of 504 clinical isolates from Zhejiang Province, China to ertapenem, tigecycline, gentamicin, fosfomycin, gemifloxacin, doxycycline and rifampicin were investigated using the agar dilution method. The presence of resistance determinants was identified by polymerase chain reaction and sequencing. The minimum inhibitory concentration inhibiting 90% of growth (MIC₉₀) was 0.06 mg/L for ertapenem, 0.25 mg/L for tigecycline, 16 mg/L for doxycycline, 4 mg/L for gemifloxacin, 16 mg/L for gentamicin, 32 mg/L for fosfomycin and 128 mg/L for rifampicin. All strains appeared to be susceptible to tigecycline (MIC ≤0.5 mg/L), while a poor correlation between tigecycline and tetracycline susceptibility was observed, indicating that tetracycline resistance determinants have little impact on tigecycline susceptibility. For ertapenem, 30 isolates showed an MIC >0.125 mg/L, but the correlation between ertapenem and ceftriaxone susceptibility was low and only two strains showed an MIC >0.125 mg/L for both antibiotics. Therefore, it appeared that most ceftriaxone-resistant isolates were still susceptible to ertapenem. In conclusion, tigecycline and ertapenem showed good activity against N. gonorrhoeae and limited cross-resistance with previously used antibiotics. Therefore, they might be interesting candidates for further evaluation of their suitability as alternative antigonococcal therapies.

Epidemiological surveillance study of gonococcal infection in Northern Spain

BACKGROUND

Treatment of gonorrhoea is threatened by antimicrobial resistance, and decreased susceptibility to recommended therapies is emerging. Thus, gonococcal infection (GI) is becoming a public health problem. The objectives of the present study were to monitor the antimicrobial sensitivity in Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) during 2011-2015 and to study their genogroups.

METHODS

Antimicrobial susceptibility was studied by disc diffusion, in addition to the agar dilution method for cefixime and ceftriaxone and the Etest® for azithromycin. Genotyping was performed by the NG multi-antigen sequence typing (NG-MAST) method. Genogroups of closely related sequence types (STs) were defined.

RESULTS

All the strains were susceptible to cefixime, ceftriaxone and gentamicin and 1.8% of the strains were resistant to azithromycin. A total of 531 STs and 6 genotypes (Gs) were identified during 2012-2015 period. G2992 was the largest and was associated with resistance to azithromycin, and with men who have sex with men (MSM), alongside G2400. G1407 and G2400 strains were related to high minimum inhibitory concentration (MICs) to cefixime and G1407 also to ceftriaxone. For the first time, G1861 and G2018 were described and associated with ciprofloxacin resistance and G2018 also with high MICs to ceftriaxone.

CONCLUSION

Molecular typing is a useful tool to predict antimicrobial resistance. These results show the need to develop novel antimicrobials or to design new antimicrobial therapies based on drugs that show their efficacy against GI. This also highlights the importance of developing sexually transmitted infection (STI) surveillance in homosexual populations.

In Vitro Synergy Testing of Gentamicin, an Old Drug Suggested as Future Treatment Option for Gonorrhoea, in Combination With Six Other Antimicrobials Against Multidrug-Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae Strains

BACKGROUND

Emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Neisseria gonorrhoeae is a serious concern and combination therapy has been recommended to delay the onset of treatment failures. Gentamicin, an old and inexpensive antibiotic, is recommended in combination with azithromycin for treatment failures cases with the first-line regimen as per the latest Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sexually transmitted disease treatment guidelines. However, not much literature is available on in vitro and in vivo efficacy of this combination. Therefore, this study was carried out to evaluate the in vitro synergy of gentamicin in combination with azithromycin and 5 other antimicrobials.

METHODS

In vitro synergy of gentamicin in combination with cefixime, ceftriaxone, spectinomycin, azithromycin, moxifloxacin, and ertapenem was determined by Etest for 75 N. gonorrhoeae strains, of which 65 were MDR and one was XDR. Fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) of ≤0.5 and >4.0 denoted synergy and antagonism respectively.

RESULTS

Maximum efficacy of gentamicin was observed in combination with ertapenem (geometric mean FICI, 0.56) followed by cefixime (FICI, 0.87). There was no antagonism for both these combinations. However, antagonism was demonstrated in 5.3%, 8%, 8%, and 10.7% strains when gentamicin was paired with spectinomycin (FICI, 1.34), ceftriaxone (FICI, 1.13), azithromycin (FICI, 1.49), and moxifloxacin (FICI, 1.30), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that gentamicin significantly enhances the in vitro therapeutic potency of ertapenem and cefixime which will be potentially effective to control the spread of MDR and XDR N. gonorrhoeae. The study warrants more in vitro studies and clinical trials for gentamicin + azithromycin and other 3 combinations because of considerable antagonism.

Comparison of disk diffusion and agar dilution methods for gentamicin susceptibility testing of Neisseria gonorrhoeae

Gentamicin is a promising antibiotic for the treatment of multidrug-resistant gonorrhea. The aim of this study was to analyze the suitability and reliably of disk diffusion to monitor the susceptibility to gentamicin. We studied 237 Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates obtained in 2013 and 2015. Reference MICs were correlated with inhibition zone diameters (in millimeters) of gentamicin 10 µg disks manufactured by BBL and Oxoid. The Pearson correlation between disk diffusion and agar dilution was r = -.68 (P < 0.001) for BBL disk and r = -.71 (P < 0.001) for Oxoid disk. No very major or major discrepancies were detected. However, a high percentage of minor discrepancies was observed (44.7%, BBL disk) and (21.9%, Oxoid disk). By adjusting the susceptible breakpoint to S ≥ 17 mm, the minor discrepancies rate was reduced to 19.4% (BBL disk) and 10.1% (Oxoid disk). The disk diffusion may be a screening method in clinical laboratories to detect the gentamicin susceptibility of N. gonorrhoeae.

In vitro efficacy of 21 dual antimicrobial combinations comprising novel and currently recommended combinations for treatment of drug resistant gonorrhoea in future era

BACKGROUND

Recent WHO guidelines recommend dual therapy with ceftriaxone or cefixime plus azithromycin for gonorrhea. Azithromycin in combination with gentamicin or spectinomycin has been recommended in treatment failure cases. Due to emergence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) and extensively-drug resistant (XDR) Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains, it is important to look for efficacy of these combinations and also of others that might be used in future. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate in vitro synergy of 21 dual combinations including current and alternative WHO recommended treatment regimens and other dual combinations.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

The potential utility of in-vitro interactions of 21 combinations was investigated against 95 N. gonorrhoeae strains including 79 MDR and one XDR strain collected during March 2013 to July 2017 and fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) was calculated. These 21 combinations comprised of two WHO currently recommended (cefixime+azithromycin, ceftriaxone+azithromycin); two WHO recommended in treatment failure cases (azithromycin+gentamicin, spectinomycin+azithromycin) and other 17 combinations.

RESULTS

FICI of the four WHO recommended antimicrobial combinations were higher (>1.0) than the five novel combinationbreeds (FICI range 0.603-0.951) in the study i.e. gentamicin+ertapenem, moxifloxacin+ertapenem, spectinomycin+ertapenem, azithromycin+ moxifloxacin, cefixime+gentamicin. No antagonistic effect of the above four WHO recommended combinations except spectinomycin+azithromycin (FICI = 4.25) was observed for the XDR strain. Out of above five novel combinations, four combinations produced high synergistic effects in overall 95 strains and also for the XDR strain with FICI of 0.13 to 0.38. Antagonistic effects varying from 3.2 to 12.6% were observed for 10 out of 21 tested combinations (azithromycin in combination with gentamicin and spectinomycin; ceftriaxone with moxifloxacin, gentamicin, spectinomycin and ertapenem; spectinomycin with moxifloxacin and gentamicin; cefixime and gentamicin combination with moxifloxacin).

CONCLUSION

WHO recommended cefixime+azithromycin, ceftriaxone+azithromycin combinations having no antagonism indicates their continuing clinical utility. Highest antagonism without any synergistic effect for the WHO recommended spectinomycin+azithromycin in treatment failure cases suggests that this combination should be evaluated further both in vitro and in vivo. Highest synergistic or additive effect without any antagonistic effect of the above five novel combinations suggests that these may be recommended for treatment in future.

Gentamicin Susceptibility among a Sample of Multidrug-Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae Isolates in India

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of 258 Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates by Etest determined that 60.1% were multidrug resistant (MDR), while 5% of the strains had decreased susceptibility to currently recommended extended-spectrum cephalosporins (ESCs). Among these, 84.5% of MDR strains and 76.9% of strains that had decreased susceptibility to ESCs were susceptible to gentamicin. No MDR isolate was resistant to gentamicin. These in vitro results suggest that gentamicin might be an effective treatment option for the MDR strains and in dual therapy for gonorrhea. However, further research regarding the clinical treatment outcomes is essential.