Effect of ceftazidime/avibactam plus fosfomycin combination on 30 day mortality in patients with bloodstream infections caused by KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: results from a multicentre retrospective study

Intravenous Fosfomycin as Adjunctive Therapy for Gram-Negative Bacteria Bloodstream Infections: A Propensity Score Adjusted Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The role of intravenous fosfomycin (iv-FOS) as a part of combination therapy for Gram-negative bacteria bloodstream infections (GNB-BSI) needs to be evaluated in clinical practice, as in vitro data show potential efficacy.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with a GNB-BSI from 01 January 2021 to 01 April 2023 were included. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. A Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of mortality; an inverse-probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW) analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 363 patients were enrolled: 211 (58%) males, with a median (q1-q3) age of 68 (57-78) years, and a median Charlson comorbidity index of 5 (3-7). At GNB-BSI onset, the median SOFA score was 5 (2-7) and 122 patients (34%) presented with septic shock. Pathogens were principally Klebsiella pneumoniae (42%), Escherichia coli (28%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17%); of them, 36% were carbapenem-resistant. The therapy included carbapenems (40%), cephalosporins (37%) and beta-lactams/beta-lactamases-inhibitors (19%); a combination with iv-FOS was used in 98 (27%) cases at a median dosage of 16 (16-18) g/daily. The use of iv-FOS was not associated with reduced crude mortality (21% vs 29%, P = 0.147). However, on multivariable Cox-regression, combination therapy with iv-FOS resulted in protection for mortality (aHR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.92), but not other combo-therapies (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.44-1.16). This result was also confirmed with the IPTW-adjusted Cox model (aHR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31-0.91). Subgroup analysis suggested a benefit in severe infections (SOFA > 6, PITT ≥ 4) and when iv-FOS was initiated within 24 hours of GNB-BSI onset.

CONCLUSIONS

Fosfomycin in combination therapy for GNB-BSI may have a role in improving survival. These results justify the development of further clinical trials.

Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Alone versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Fosfomycin for the Treatment of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Multicentric Retrospective Study from the SUSANA Cohort

Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilation-associated pneumonia (VAP) are challenging clinical conditions due to the challenging tissue penetrability of the lung. This study aims to evaluate the potential role of fosfomycin (FOS) associated with ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) in improving the outcome in this setting. We performed a retrospective study including people with HAP or VAP treated with CZA or CZA+FOS for at least 72 h. Clinical data were collected from the SUSANA study, a multicentric cohort to monitor the efficacy and safety of the newer antimicrobial agents. A total of 75 nosocomial pneumonia episodes were included in the analysis. Of these, 34 received CZA alone and 41 in combination with FOS (CZA+FOS). People treated with CZA alone were older, more frequently male, received a prolonged infusion more frequently, and were less frequently affected by carbapenem-resistant infections (p = 0.01, p = 0.06, p < 0.001, p = 0.03, respectively). No difference was found in terms of survival at 28 days from treatment start between CZA and CZA+FOS at the multivariate analysis (HR = 0.32; 95% CI = 0.07-1.39; p = 0.128), while prolonged infusion showed a lower mortality rate at 28 days (HR = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.14-0.96; p = 0.04). Regarding safety, three adverse events (one acute kidney failure, one multiorgan failure, and one urticaria) were reported. Our study found no significant association between combination therapy and mortality. Further investigations, with larger and more homogeneous samples, are needed to evaluate the role of combination therapy in this setting.

Clinical effectiveness of cefiderocol for the treatment of bloodstream infections due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii during the COVID-19 era: a single center, observational study

BACKGROUND

We assessed the clinical effectiveness of cefiderocol (CFDC) in comparison with colistin (COL) for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) bloodstream infections (BSI).

MATERIALS/METHODS

Retrospective cohort study including adults with CRAB-BSI. Outcomes were mortality, clinical cure and adverse events during therapy. The average treatment effect of CFDC compared to COL was weighted with the inverse-probability treatment weight (IPTW).

RESULTS

Overall, 104 patients were included (50 CFDC, 54 COL), median age 66.5 years, median Charlson Comorbidity Index 5, septic shock in 33.6% of patients. Primary BSI accounted for 43.3% of cases, followed by ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (26%), catheter-related BSI (20.2%) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) (9.6%). Although not significantly, mortality at all time points was lower for CFDC than COL, while clinical cure was higher in CFDC than COL (66% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.027). Adverse events were more frequent in COL than CFDC-group (38.8% vs. 10%, p < 0.0001), primarily attributed to acute kidney injury (AKI) in the COL group. Patients with bacteremic HAP/VAP treated with CFDC had a significant lower 30-d mortality and higher clinical cure than COL (p = 0.008 and p = 0.0008, respectively). Increment of CCI (p = 0.005), ICU (p = 0.025), SARS-CoV2 (p = 0.006) and ECMO (p < 0.0001) were independently associated with 30-d mortality, while receiving CFDC was not associated with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

CFDC could represent an effective and safe treatment option for CRAB BSI, especially in patients with bacteremic HAP/VAP and frail patients where the risk of acute renal failure during therapy should be avoided.

Simultaneous post-neurosurgical ventriculitis and bacteraemia by two different strains of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae successfully treated with meropenem/vaborbactam and high dose of fosfomycin

OBJECTIVE

A case of post-neurosurgical ventriculitis caused by a KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) with a ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant, meropenem-susceptible phenotype is reported.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The patient had a concomitant bloodstream infection with a wild-type KPC-Kp with a ceftazidime/avibactam-susceptible, meropenem-resistant phenotype. Prolonged treatment with intravenous fosfomycin and meropenem/vaborbactam achieved clinical success. Therapeutic drug monitoring performed during the first days of treatment showed for the first time that vaborbactam efficiently penetrates cerebrospinal fluid. In contrast, meropenem was undetectable in cerebrospinal fluid at each sampling, suggesting that additional doses of meropenem may be required to appropriately prescribe meropenem/vaborbactam for central nervous system infections. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid levels of fosfomycin were adequate, confirming the potential of this agent possibly even in the fight against multidrug-resistant organisms.

CONCLUSIONS

This case highlights the need for therapeutic drug monitoring as a crucial tool for optimizing treatment in complicated cases where the pharmacokinetic behaviour of antibiotics is difficult to predict.

Donor-derived carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections in solid organ transplant recipients: Active surveillance enhances recipient safety

Donor-derived infections (DDIs) caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) in solid organ transplant recipients are potentially life-threatening. In this prospective study, we evaluated the incidence, factors associated with transmission, and the outcome of recipients with unexpected CR-GNB DDIs after the implementation of our local active surveillance system (LASS). LASS provides for early detection of unexpected donor CR-GNB infections, prophylaxis of recipients at high risk, and early diagnosis and treatment of DDIs. Whole genome sequencing confirmed DDI. Among 791 recipients, 38 (4.8%) were at high risk of unexpected CR-GNB DDI: 25 for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and 13 for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). Transmission did not occur in 27 (71%) cases, whereas DDIs occurred in 9 of 25 of CRE and 2 of 13 of CRAB cases. Incidence of CR-GNB DDI was 1.4%. Recipients of organs with CR-GNB-positive preservation fluid and liver recipients from a donor with CRE infection were at the highest risk of DDI. There was no difference in length of hospital stay or survival in patients with and without CR-GNB DDI. Our LASS contains transmission and mitigates the negative impacts of CR-GNB DDI. Under well-defined conditions, organs from donors with CR-GNB may be considered after a thorough evaluation of the risk/benefit profile.

New Antimicrobials and New Therapy Strategies for Endocarditis: Weapons That Should Be Defended

The overall low-quality evidence concerning the clinical benefits of different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of infective endocarditis (IE), which has made it difficult to strongly support or reject any regimen of antibiotic therapy, has led to a discrepancy between the available guidelines and clinical practice. In this complex scenario, very recently published guidelines have attempted to fill this gap. Indeed, in recent years several antimicrobials have entered the market, including ceftobiprole, ceftaroline, and the long-acting lipoglycopeptides dalbavancin and oritavancin. Despite being approved for different indications, real-world data on their use for the treatment of IE, alone or in combination, has accumulated over time. Furthermore, an old antibiotic, fosfomycin, has gained renewed interest for the treatment of complicated infections such as IE. In this narrative review, we focused on new antimicrobials and therapeutic strategies that we believe may provide important contributions to the advancement of Gram-positive IE treatment, providing a summary of the current in vitro, in vivo, and clinical evidence supporting their use in clinical practice.

Plasmid-mediated fosfomycin resistance in Escherichia coli isolates of worldwide origin

OBJECTIVES

Fosfomycin is a first-line treatment for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) in several European countries, and it is increasingly becoming the treatment of choice globally. Resistance to fosfomycin in Escherichia coli can be exerted through several mechanisms, including the acquisition of fosfomycin-modifying enzymes, of which the FosA-type enzymes are the most common. This study analysed, both phenotypically and genotypically, an international collection of E. coli strains harbouring acquired fosA genes.

METHODS

Thirty-one fosA-positive E. coli isolates were obtained from both clinical and environmental sources, from seven countries (Portugal (n = 12), Switzerland (n = 9), China (n = 3), France (n = 2), Nepal (n = 2), South Africa (n = 2), Kuwait (n = 1)). MICs were determined according to EUCAST guidelines. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on 23 isolates, and complete fosA plasmid sequences were determined for 12. Conjugation assays were performed on seven isolates.

RESULTS

All isolates exhibited high-level resistance to fosfomycin (64 to >256 mg/L). WGS of 23 isolates identified 17 sequence types (STs), and 16 harboured fosA3, four fosA4, two fosA8, and one fosA10. ESBLs, pAmpC, or carbapenemase genes were present in 15, four, and three isolates, respectively. The fosA plasmids of 12 isolates were determined and were diverse in size (∼67 kb to ∼235 kb), resistance gene carriage, and replicon types. Six fosA plasmids additionally carried ESBL or carbapenemase genes. Conjugation assays, performed on seven isolates harbouring diverse plasmids, identified that all were capable of being transmitted.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the necessity of the surveillance and close monitoring of fosfomycin resistance in E. coli, essential to maintain the optimal use of this treatment option.

Mutations in ompK36 differentially impact in vitro synergy of meropenem/vaborbactam and ceftazidime/avibactam in combination with other antibiotics against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

Objectives

Ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam are preferred agents for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) infections and are often used in combination with other agents. We aimed to characterize the synergy of combinations against KPC-Kp with varying ompK36 genotypes.

Methods

KPC-Kp that harboured ompK36 WT, IS5 or glycine-aspartic acid duplication (GD) genotypes were selected. MICs were determined in triplicate. Synergy was assessed by time-kill assays for ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam in combination with colistin, gentamicin, tigecycline, meropenem or fosfomycin against 1 × 108 cfu/mL KPC-Kp.

Results

KPC-Kp harboured ompK36 WT (n = 5), IS5 (n = 5) or GD (n = 5); 11 were KPC-2 and 4 were KPC-3. All were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam. In time-kill analysis, ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam 1 × MIC exhibited mean 24 h log-kills of -2.01 and -0.84, respectively. Ceftazidime/avibactam was synergistic in combination with colistin independent of ompK36 genotype. Ceftazidime/avibactam combinations impacted by porin mutations (compared to WT) were meropenem (-5.18 versus -6.62 mean log-kill, P < 0.001) and fosfomycin (-3.98 versus -6.58, P = 0.058). Mean log-kills with meropenem/vaborbactam were greatest in combination with gentamicin (-5.36). In the presence of porin mutations, meropenem/vaborbactam killing activity was potentiated by the addition of colistin (-6.65 versus -0.70, P = 0.03) and fosfomycin (-3.12 versus 1.54, P = 0.003).

Conclusions

Our results shed new light on the synergy of ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam combinations against KPC-Kp with or without porin mutations. Killing activity of ceftazidime/avibactam with other cell wall active agents was decreased against isolates with porin mutations. On the other hand, some meropenem/vaborbactam combinations demonstrated enhanced killing in the presence of porin mutations.

In vitro, in vivo and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy with ceftazidime-avibactam-containing combination regimens against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates or infections: a scoping review

Introduction

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PA) infections are associated with a high risk of morbidity, mortality, and treatment costs. We aimed to evaluate in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) combination regimens with CZA alone against CRE and/or MDR-PA isolates or infections.

Methods

We systematically reviewed the relevant literature in CINAHL/MEDLINE, Pubmed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus until December 1, 2022. Review articles, grey literature, abstracts, comments, editorials, non-peer reviewed articles, non-English articles, and in vitro synergy studies conducted on single isolates were excluded.

Results

22 in vitro, 7 in vivo and 20 clinical studies were evaluated. In vitro studies showed reliable synergy between CZA and aztreonam against metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing isolates. Some studies indicated good in vitro synergy between CZA and amikacin, meropenem, fosfomycin and polymyxins against CRE isolates. For MDR-PA isolates, there are comparatively fewer in vitro or in vivo studies. In observational clinical studies, mortality, clinical cure, adverse events, and development of CZA resistance after exposure were generally similar in monotherapy and combination therapy groups. However, antibiotic-related nephrotoxicity and infection relapses were higher in patients receiving CZA combination therapies.

Discussion

The benefit, if any, of CZA combination regimens in MDR-PA infections is elusive, as very few clinical studies have included these infections. There is no currently documented clinical benefit for the use of CZA combination regimens rather than CZA monotherapy. CZA combined with aztreonam for serious infections due to MBL producers should be evaluated by randomized controlled trials.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=278552, CRD42021278552.

Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) bloodstream infections and related mortality in critically ill patients with CRAB colonization

Background

Among MDR bacteria, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is a major concern due to the limited therapeutic options. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a worrying increase in the spread of CRAB infections was reported.

Objectives

The study assessed the risk factors for CRAB bloodstream infection (BSI) in patients admitted to the ICU with CRAB colonization, and the related mortality risk factors.

Methods

We conducted a single-centre, observational, prospective study; all consecutive patients with CRAB colonization admitted to the ICU of a tertiary hospital in Rome from January 2021 to September 2022 were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate BSI and mortality risk factors.

Results

Overall, 129 patients were included in the study; 57 (44%) out of these developed BSI. In our study population, at the multivariable analysis the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (P = 0.026), COVID-19 (P < 0.001), multisite colonization (P = 0.016) and the need for mechanical ventilation (P = 0.024) were risk factors independently associated with BSI development. Furthermore, age (P = 0.026), CCI (P < 0.001), septic shock (P = 0.001) and Pitt score (P < 0.001) were independently associated with mortality in the BSI patients. Instead, early appropriate therapy (P = 0.002) and clinical improvement within 72 h (P = 0.011) were shown to be protective factors.

Conclusions

In critically ill patients colonized by CRAB, higher CCI, multisite colonization and the need for mechanical ventilation were identified as risk factors for BSI onset. These predictors could be useful to identify patients at highest risk of BSI.

Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli

The dissemination of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (CRGNB) is a global public health issue. CRGNB isolates are usually extensively drug-resistant or pandrug-resistant, resulting in limited antimicrobial treatment options and high mortality. A multidisciplinary guideline development group covering clinical infectious diseases, clinical microbiology, clinical pharmacology, infection control, and guideline methodology experts jointly developed the present clinical practice guidelines based on best available scientific evidence to address the clinical issues regarding laboratory testing, antimicrobial therapy, and prevention of CRGNB infections. This guideline focuses on carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriales (CRE), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA). Sixteen clinical questions were proposed from the perspective of current clinical practice and translated into research questions using PICO (population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes) format to collect and synthesize relevant evidence to inform corresponding recommendations. The grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to evaluate the quality of evidence, benefit and risk profile of corresponding interventions and formulate recommendations or suggestions. Evidence extracted from systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was considered preferentially for treatment-related clinical questions. Observational studies, non-controlled studies, and expert opinions were considered as supplementary evidence in the absence of RCTs. The strength of recommendations was classified as strong or conditional (weak). The evidence informing recommendations derives from studies worldwide, while the implementation suggestions combined the Chinese experience. The target audience of this guideline is clinician and related professionals involved in management of infectious diseases.

Rationale and evidence for the use of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefiderocol in critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

Healthcare-associated infections involving Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) phenotype are associated with impaired patient-centered outcomes and poses daily therapeutic challenges in most of intensive care units worldwide. Over the recent years, four innovative β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) combinations (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam) and a new siderophore cephalosporin (cefiderocol) have been approved for the treatment of certain DTR-GNB infections. The literature addressing their microbiological spectrum, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety was exhaustively audited by our group to support the recent guidelines of the French Intensive Care Society on their utilization in critically ill patients. This narrative review summarizes the available evidence and unanswered questions on these issues.

METHODS

A systematic search for English-language publications in PUBMED and the Cochrane Library database from inception to November 15, 2022.

RESULTS

These drugs have demonstrated relevant clinical success rates and a reduced renal risk in most of severe infections for whom polymyxin- and/or aminoglycoside-based regimen were historically used as last-resort strategies-namely, ceftazidime-avibactam for infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)- or OXA-48-like-producing Enterobacterales, meropenem-vaborbactam for KPC-producing Enterobacterales, ceftazidime-avibactam/aztreonam combination or cefiderocol for metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales, and ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem-relebactam for non-MBL-producing DTR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, limited clinical evidence exists in critically ill patients. Extended-infusion scheme (except for imipenem-relebactam) may be indicated for DTR-GNB with high minimal inhibitory concentrations and/or in case of augmented renal clearance. The potential benefit of combining these agents with other antimicrobials remains under-investigated, notably for the most severe presentations. Other important knowledge gaps include pharmacokinetic information in particular situations (e.g., pneumonia, other deep-seated infections, and renal replacement therapy), the hazard of treatment-emergent resistance and possible preventive measures, the safety of high-dose regimen, the potential usefulness of rapid molecular diagnostic tools to rationalize their empirical utilization, and optimal treatment durations. Comparative clinical, ecological, and medico-economic data are needed for infections in whom two or more of these agents exhibit in vitro activity against the causative pathogen.

CONCLUSIONS

New BL/BLI combinations and cefiderocol represent long-awaited options for improving the management of DTR-GNB infections. Several research axes must be explored to better define the positioning and appropriate administration scheme of these drugs in critically ill patients.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam Treatment for Klebsiella pneumoniae Bacteremia in Preterm Infants in NICU: A Clinical Experience

Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) is an antibiotic combination approved for the treatment of several infections caused by multi-drug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria. Neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) are at high risk of developing bacterial infections, and the choice of appropriate antibiotics is crucial. However, the use of antibiotics in neonates carries risks such as antibiotic resistance and disruption of gut microbiota. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of CAZ/AVI in preterm infants admitted to the NICU. Retrospective data from preterm infants with Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia who received CAZ/AVI were analyzed. Clinical and microbiological responses, adverse events, and outcomes were evaluated. Eight patients were included in the study, all of whom showed clinical improvement and achieved microbiological cure with CAZ/AVI treatment. No adverse drug reactions were reported. Previous antibiotic therapies failed to improve the neonates' condition, and CAZ/AVI was initiated based on clinical deterioration and epidemiological considerations. The median duration of CAZ/AVI treatment was 14 days, and combination therapy with fosfomycin or amikacin was administered. Previous case reports have also shown positive outcomes with CAZ/AVI in neonates. However, larger trials are needed to further investigate the safety and efficacy of CAZ/AVI in this population.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcome of Ceftazidime/Avibactam-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Infections: A Retrospective, Observational, 2-Center Clinical Study

Background

Recently, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) with resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA-R) has been described, including KPC variants that restore carbapenem susceptibility. The aim of the study was to analyze the clinical characteristics and outcomes of infections caused by CZA-R KPC-Kp.

Methods

From 2019 to 2021, a retrospective 2-center study including patients with infections due to CZA-R KPC-Kp hospitalized at 2 academic hospitals in Rome was conducted. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. Principal outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Statistical analyses were performed with Stata-IC17 software.

Results

Overall, 59 patients were included (mean age, 64.4 ± 14.6 years; mean Charlson comorbidity index score, 4.5 ± 2.7). Thirty-four patients (57.6%) had infections caused by CZA-R and meropenem (MEM)-susceptible strains. A previous CZA therapy was observed in 40 patients (67.8%), mostly in patients with MEM-susceptible KPC variant (79.4% vs 52%, P = .026). Primary bacteremia was observed in 28.8%, followed by urinary tract infections and pneumonia. At infection onset, septic shock was present in 15 subjects (25.4%). After adjustment for confounders, only the presence of septic shock was independently associated with mortality (P = .006).

Conclusions

Infections due to CZA-R KPC-Kp often occur in patients who had previously received CZA, especially in the presence of strains susceptible to MEM. Nevertheless, one-third of patients had never received CZA before KPC-Kp CZA-R. Since the major driver for mortality was infection severity, understanding the optimal therapy in patients with KPC-Kp CZA-R infections is of crucial importance.

The Use of Intravenous Fosfomycin in Clinical Practice: A 5-Year Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Hospital in Italy

Fosfomycin in intravenous (IV) formulation has re-emerged as a valuable tool in the treatment of multi-drug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) infections because of its broad spectrum of antibacterial action and pharmacokinetic characteristics. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate how fosfomycin was used in patients admitted to the Polyclinic of Palermo between January 2017 and July 2022. Clinical indications, therapeutic associations, clinical outcomes, and any side effects were analyzed. Intravenous fosfomycin was used in 343 patients, 63% male, with a mean age of 68 years (range 15-95). Urinary tract infections (UTIs) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) were the main indications for treatment (19% and 18% of the total cases, respectively), followed by skin and soft tissue infections and sepsis. IV fosfomycin was administered in combination with other antibacterial agents, the most common of which were ceftazidime/avibactam (35%), meropenem (17%), and colistin (14%). Nineteen patients received it as monotherapy for UTIs. About 66% had resolution of the infectious process with clinical remission (cure or discharge). Electrolyte disturbances occurred in 2.6% and gastrointestinal symptoms occurred in 2.9%. The data showed that IV fosfomycin is a safe and effective therapeutic option in the treatment of infections with multidrug-resistant microorganisms.

Effect of appropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy on mortality of patients with Gram-negative bloodstream infections: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Little evidence exists regarding the prevalence of pathogens in bloodstream infections (BSIs), the mortality risk, and the benefit of combination therapy over monotherapy. This study aims to describe patterns of empiric antimicrobial therapy, and the epidemiology of Gram-negative pathogens, and to investigate the effect of appropriate therapy and appropriate combination therapy on the mortality of patients with BSIs.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study including all patients with BSIs of Gram-negative pathogens from January 2017 to December 2022 in a Chinese general hospital. The in-hospital mortality was compared between appropriate and inappropriate therapy, and between monotherapy and combination therapy for patients receiving appropriate therapy. We used Cox regression analysis to identify factors independently associated with in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

We included 205 patients in the study, of whom 147 (71.71%) patients received appropriate therapy compared with 58 (28.29%) who received inappropriate therapy. The most common Gram-negative pathogen was Escherichia coli (37.56%). 131 (63.90%) patients received monotherapy and 74 (36.10%) patients received combination therapy. The in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in patients administered appropriate therapy than inappropriate therapy (16.33% vs. 48.28%, p = 0.004); adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.55 [95% CI 0.35-0.84], p = 0.006). In-hospital mortality was also not different in combination therapy and monotherapy in the multivariate Cox regression analyses (adjusted HR 0.42 [95% CI 0.15-1.17], p = 0.096). However, combination therapy was associated with lower mortality than monotherapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock (adjusted HR 0.94 [95% CI 0.86-1.02], p = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriate therapy was associated with a protective effect on mortality among patients with BSIs due to Gram-negative pathogens. Combination therapy was associated with improved survival in patients with sepsis or septic shock. Clinicians need to choose optical empirical antimicrobials to improve survival outcomes in patients with BSIs.