AACC/NKF Guidance Document on Improving Equity in Chronic Kidney Disease Care

Clinical Utility of LC-MS/MS for Blood Myo-Inositol in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury and Chronic Kidney Disease

BACKGROUND

Diagnosing acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) relies on creatinine, which lacks optimal diagnostic sensitivity. The kidney-specific proximal tubular enzyme myo-inositol oxygenase (MIOX) catalyzes the conversion of myo-inositol (MI) to D-glucuronic acid. We hypothesized that proximal tubular damage, which occurs in AKI and CKD, will decrease MIOX activity, causing MI accumulation. To explore this, we developed an LC-MS/MS assay to quantify plasma MI and assessed its potential in identifying AKI and CKD patients.

METHODS

MI was quantified in plasma from 3 patient cohorts [normal kidney function (n = 105), CKD (n = 94), and AKI (n = 54)]. The correlations between MI and creatinine were determined using Deming regression and Pearson correlation and the impact of age, sex, and ethnicity on MI concentrations was assessed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was employed to evaluate MI diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

In volunteers with normal kidney function, the central 95th percentile range of plasma MI concentrations was 16.6 to 44.2 µM. Age, ethnicity, and sex showed minimal influence on MI. Patients with AKI and CKD exhibited higher median MI concentrations [71.1 (25th percentile: 38.2, 75th percentile: 115.4) and 102.4 (77, 139.5) µM], respectively. MI exhibited excellent sensitivity (98.9%) and specificity (100%) for diagnosing CKD. In patients with AKI, MI increased 32.9 (SD 16.8) h before creatinine.

CONCLUSIONS

This study unveils MI as a potential renal biomarker, notably elevated in plasma during AKI and CKD. Plasma MI rises 33 h prior to serum creatinine, enabling early AKI detection. Further validation and exploration of MI quantitation in kidney disease diagnosis is warranted.

Cystatin C as a Marker of Kidney Function in Children

This review examines the reliability of cystatin C as a biomarker for kidney function in paediatric populations. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects a significant number of children globally, leading to severe health complications such as anaemia, hypertension, and growth disorders. Traditionally, kidney function has been assessed using the estimated glomerular filtration rate derived from serum creatinine, though this method is flawed due to variability in muscle mass, age, gender, and diet. Cystatin C offers an alternative as it is less influenced by these factors. Evidence from various studies indicates that cystatin C provides a more accurate assessment of kidney function, especially in neonates and children with urinary tract malformations. Additionally, it is more reliable in early detection of acute kidney injury in paediatric intensive care units. Despite its potential, cystatin C is not yet widely adopted in clinical guidelines, primarily due to a lack of large-scale paediatric studies. Nonetheless, existing research supports its utility in providing a consistent and precise measure of kidney function across different paediatric age groups, suggesting that it could enhance early diagnosis and management of CKD in children if more extensive validation studies are conducted.

A Holistic Framework for the Evaluation of Kidney Function in a Gender-Diverse Landscape

The most commonly used equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate incorporate a binary male-female sex coefficient, which has important implications for the care of transgender, gender-diverse, and nonbinary (TGD) people. Whether "sex assigned at birth" or a binary "gender identity" is most appropriate for the computation of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is unknown. Furthermore, the use of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) for the development of physical changes to align TGD people with their affirmed gender is increasingly common, and may result in changes in serum creatinine and cystatin C, the biomarkers commonly used to estimate glomerular filtration rate. The paucity of current literature evaluating chronic kidney disease (CKD) prevalence and outcomes in TGD individuals on GAHT makes it difficult to assess any effects of GAHT on kidney function. Whether alterations in serum creatinine reflect changes in glomerular filtration rate or simply changes in muscle mass is unknown. Therefore, we propose a holistic framework to evaluate kidney function in TGD people. The framework focuses on kidney disease prevalence, risk factors, sex hormones, eGFR, other kidney function assessment tools, and the mitigation of health inequities in TGD people.

Impact of sex used for assignment of reference intervals in a population of patients taking gender-affirming hormones

Background

Gender-affirming hormone therapy with either estradiol or testosterone for transgender persons can significantly impact chemistry and hematology laboratory tests. The sex used for assignment of reference intervals (RIs) in the electronic health record (EHR) will influence normal/abnormal flagging of test results.

Objective

To analyze common non-hormonal laboratory tests with sex-specific RIs ordered in patients with sexual orientation/gender identify (SOGI) field differences (one or more differences between legal sex, sex assigned at birth, and gender identity) in the EHR at an academic medical center in midwestern United States.

Methods

We utilized a previously characterized data set of patients at our institution that included chart review information on gender identity and gender-affirming therapy. We focused on the subset of these patients that had orders for 18 common laboratory tests in calendar year 2021.

Results

A total of 1336 patients with SOGI field differences (1218 or 91.2% identifying as gender-expansive; 892 or 66.8% receiving estradiol or testosterone as gender-affirming therapy) had a total of 9374 orders for 18 laboratory tests with sex-specific RIs. Hemoglobin, creatinine, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and high-density lipoprotein were the most frequently ordered tests. For patients taking estradiol, 128 of 970 (13.2%) creatinine and 39 of 193 (20.2%) hemoglobin measurements were within the RI for one sex but not the other. For those taking testosterone, 119 of 531 (22.4%) creatinine and 49 of 120 (40.8%) hemoglobin measurements were within the RI for one sex but not the other. Values above the cisgender female RI but within the cisgender male RI were common for hemoglobin, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase in patients taking testosterone.

Conclusions

Clinicians should be aware of the potential impact of gender-affirming therapy on laboratory tests and what sex/gender is being used in the EHR to assign RIs.

Development and validation of an LC-MSMS method to quantify creatinine from dried blood spots

Introduction

Screening for chronic kidney disease relies on accurate and precise creatinine measurements. Traditionally, creatinine is measured in serum or plasma using high-throughput chemistry analyzers. However, dried blood spots (DBS) can also be utilized to improve testing access.

Methods

Samples were obtained from a 6 mm DBS punch, which was reconstituted in water before undergoing an acetonitrile crash. The resulting supernatant was diluted using an 80:20 acetonitrile: water before injection. Creatinine was identified using an isocratic gradient, and detected using an API 4000 triple quadrupole mass analyzer. Quantification relied on matrix-matched calibrators, with values harmonized to the Roche Cobas enzymatic assay. Validation studies assessing method performance included precision, linearity, accuracy, method comparison, stability, interference, and matrix effects.

Results

The LC-MSMS assay was linear from 0.3 to 20 mg/dL (y = 1.02x-0.11; R2 = 0.996). Precision ranged from 5.2 to 8.1 % using matrix-matched controls (n = 4) that spanned the analytical measurement range. LC-MSMS results corresponded to the enzymatic assay (Roche) with a fitted line equation of y = 0.956x-0.07 (R2 = 0.995; n = 173). The Siemens and Roche enzymatic assays demonstrated higher accuracy in correlating to the DBS creatinine concentration (n = 40 paired venous/DBS collections) compared to the Beckman Jaffe assay (-2.5 % and -0.8 % versus -6.3 % and -4.1 %, respectively) or the iSTAT (-28.4 % and -27.1 %, respectively). Accuracy was unaffected by hematocrit, blood spot volume, excess IgG or IgA, or hypertriglyceridemia. No matrix effects were observed, and both extraction and processing efficiency were robust.Ambient stability extended to at least 10 days, and exposure to extreme temperature did not affect the creatinine results.

Conclusion

We successfully developed an accurate and precise LC-MSMS method for quantifying creatinine in DBS.

Screening, identifying, and treating chronic kidney disease: why, who, when, how, and what?

1 in 7 American adults have chronic kidney disease (CKD); a disease that increases risk for CKD progression, cardiovascular events, and mortality. Currently, the US Preventative Services Task Force does not have a screening recommendation, though evidence suggests that screening can prevent progression and is cost-effective. Populations at risk for CKD, such as those with hypertension, diabetes, and age greater than 50 years should be targeted for screening. CKD is diagnosed and risk stratified with estimated glomerular filtration rate utilizing serum creatinine and measuring urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio. Once identified, CKD is staged according to C-G-A classification, and managed with lifestyle modification, interdisciplinary care and the recently expanding repertoire of pharmacotherapy which includes angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-II receptor blockers, sodium-glucose-cotransporter-2 inhibitors, and mineralocorticorticoid receptor antagonists. In this paper, we present the why, who, when, how, and what of CKD screening.

The 2021 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration Race-Free Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Equations in Kidney Disease: Leading the Way in Ending Disparities

Purpose

In 2020, the National Kidney Foundation (NKF) and the American Society of Nephrology (ASN) convened a Task Force to recommend an evidence-based race-free approach to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). After the rigorous review of more than 20 approaches, the NKF/ASN Task Force published the final report that recommended the implementation of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI 2021) equation for eGFR using creatine and expanded utilization of cystatin C testing. The purpose of this manuscript is to provide a comprehensive overview of the evolution of eGFR equations, and an overview of the Task Force deliberations and recommendations. For over two decades, the equation recommended to calculate eGFR included a race coefficient to adjust for data that suggested that American adults with African ancestry had consistently higher serum creatinine levels.

Methods

We will provide a discussion illustrating why the 2021 CKD EPI equations are the most equitable solution to eGFR. We will also provide an overview of the current implementation status and best practices for the new equations. Lastly, we will discuss how deployment of the new equations is an important step toward eliminating significant disparities in CKD care which disproportionately affect communities of color.

Results

Removing race from the algorithm used to assess kidney function is most equitable. Since race is a social construct, its use in clinical algorithms has facilitated health disparities in Black/African American people, Hispanic/Latino people, and other racial and ethnic minority groups-those who are already disproportionately impacted by diabetes, hypertension, and kidney disease. In turn, these same individuals experience significant inequities in kidney health care including reduced access to nephrology care, home dialysis, and kidney transplant.

Conclusions

Adoption of the race-free 2021 CKD-EPI eGFR equations will have life changing implications for kidney health. It will aid in appropriate referral, identification, diagnosis, treatment, and management of kidney disease and transplantation services/options. The outcomes of widespread implementation of the new equations coupled with system change quality improvement interventions such as the kidney profile will lead to more equitable outcomes and begin to address the crippling disparities in early, appropriate testing for CKD.