1
|
Özduyan Kılıç M, Korkmaz F. Adaptation of the Workflow Integration Survey to Turkey: A Validity and Reliability Study. J Nurs Meas 2024; 32:174-182. [PMID: 37348887 DOI: 10.1891/jnm-2022-0025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Electronic health record systems (EHRSs) are widely used to record patients' data and should be compatible with nurses' workflow. The purpose of this study was to adapt the Workflow Integration Survey (WIS) to the Turkish language and examine the reliability and validity measures of the Turkish version of the scale. Methods: In this methodological study, data were collected between December 2019 and February 2020 from 120 nurses. This study included the following phases: translation and evaluation of the content validity; explanatory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability analysis. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for the test-retest reliability with 30 nurses. Results: The results of CFA revealed a two factors' structure, and these two factors explained 50.57% of the total variance. This was confirmed (χ2/df = 1.673, goodness-of-fit index = 0.948, incremental fit index = 0.923, comparative fit index = 0.918, root mean square error of approximation = 0.075, and standardized root mean square residual = 0.0604) using structural equation modeling. The total Cronbach's alpha value was found to be .702, .636, and .649 for the subscales. The ICC was calculated for test-retest reliability and was found to be 0.871. Conclusions: The validity and reliability of the WIS have been found to be sufficient. It is recommended that the validity and reliability studies on the WIS be conducted in different hospitals with a larger number of participants. Furthermore, the use of the scale in cross-cultural studies to evaluate the compatibility of EHRSs with nurses' workflow in different cultures is also suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fatoş Korkmaz
- Faculty of Nursing, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fritz JM, Gibson B, Wetter DW, Del Fiol G, Solis V, Ford I, Lundberg K, Thackeray A. Use of implementation mapping in the planning of a hybrid type 1 pragmatic clinical trial: the BeatPain Utah study. Implement Sci Commun 2024; 5:3. [PMID: 38183154 PMCID: PMC10768478 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00542-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Considerable disparities in chronic pain management have been identified. Persons in rural, lower income, and minoritized communities are less likely to receive evidence-based, nonpharmacologic care. Telehealth delivery of nonpharmacologic, evidence-based interventions for persons with chronic pain is a promising strategy to lessen disparities, but implementation comes with many challenges. The BeatPain Utah study is a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation pragmatic clinical trial investigating telehealth strategies to provide nonpharmacologic care from physical therapists to persons with chronic back pain receiving care in ommunity health centers (CHCs). CHCs provide primary care to all persons regardless of ability to pay. This paper outlines the use of implementation mapping to develop a multifaceted implementation plan for the BeatPain study. METHODS During a planning year for the BeatPain trial, we developed a comprehensive logic model including the five-step implementation mapping process informed by additional frameworks and theories. The five iterative implementation mapping steps were addressed in the planning year: (1) conduct needs assessments for involved groups; (2) identify implementation outcomes, performance objectives, and determinants; (3) select implementation strategies; (4) produce implementation protocols and materials; and (5) evaluate implementation outcomes. RESULTS CHC leadership/providers, patients, and physical therapists were identified as involved groups. Barriers and assets were identified across groups which informed identification of performance objectives necessary to implement two key processes: (1) electronic referral of patients with back pain in CHC clinics to the BeatPain team and (2) connecting patients with physical therapists providing telehealth. Determinants of the performance objectives for each group informed our choice of implementation strategies which focused on training, education, clinician support, and tailoring physical therapy interventions for telehealth delivery and cultural competency. We selected implementation outcomes for the BeatPain trial to evaluate the success of our implementation strategies. CONCLUSIONS Implementation mapping provided a comprehensive and systematic approach to develop an implementation plan during the planning phase for our ongoing hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial. We will be able to evaluate the implementation strategies used in the BeatPain Utah study to inform future efforts to implement telehealth delivery of evidence-based pain care in CHCs and other settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04923334 . Registered June 11, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie M Fritz
- Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, University of Utah, 383 Colorow Dr., Room 391, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
| | - Bryan Gibson
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - David W Wetter
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Center for Health Outcomes and Population Equity, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Guilherme Del Fiol
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Victor Solis
- Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, University of Utah, 383 Colorow Dr., Room 391, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Isaac Ford
- Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, University of Utah, 383 Colorow Dr., Room 391, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Kelly Lundberg
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Anne Thackeray
- Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, University of Utah, 383 Colorow Dr., Room 391, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Britton M, Rogova A, Chen TA, Martinez Leal I, Kyburz B, Williams T, Patel M, Reitzel LR. Texas tobacco quitline knowledge, attitudes, and practices within healthcare agencies serving individuals with behavioral health needs: A multimethod study. Prev Med Rep 2023; 35:102256. [PMID: 37752980 PMCID: PMC10518765 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with behavioral health conditions have disproportionately high tobacco use rates and face significant barriers to accessing evidence-based tobacco cessation services. Tobacco quitlines are an effective and accessible resource, yet they are often underutilized. We identify knowledge, practices, and attitudes towards the Texas Tobacco Quitline (TTQL) within behavioral healthcare settings in Texas. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected in 2021 as part of a statewide needs assessment in behavioral healthcare settings. Survey respondents (n = 125) represented 23 Federally Qualified Health Centers, 29 local mental health authorities (LMHAs), 12 substance use treatment programs in LMHAs, and 61 standalone substance use treatment centers (26 people participated in qualitative interviews). Over half of respondents indicated familiarity with the TTQL and believed that the TTQL was helpful for quitting. Qualitative findings reveal potential concerns about inconsistency of services, long wait time, and the format of the quitline. About half of respondents indicated that their center promoted patient referral to TTQL, and few indicated that their center had an electronic referral system with direct TTQL referral capacity. Interview respondents reported overall lack of systematic follow up with patients regarding their use of the TTQL services. Findings suggest the need for (1) increased TTQL service awareness among healthcare providers; (2) further investigation into any changes needed to better serve patients with behavioral health conditions who use tobacco; and (3) electronic health record integration supporting direct referrals and enhanced protocols to support patient follow up after TTQL referral.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maggie Britton
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Health Disparities Research, Unit 1440, 1400 Pressler Street, Houston, TX 77030, United States
- University of Houston, Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, 3657 Cullen Blvd Stephen Power Farish Hall, Houston, TX 77204, United States
- University of Houston, HEALTH Research Institute, 4349 Martin Luther King Blvd, Houston, TX 77204, United States
| | - Anastasia Rogova
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Health Disparities Research, Unit 1440, 1400 Pressler Street, Houston, TX 77030, United States
- University of Houston, Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, 3657 Cullen Blvd Stephen Power Farish Hall, Houston, TX 77204, United States
- University of Houston, HEALTH Research Institute, 4349 Martin Luther King Blvd, Houston, TX 77204, United States
| | - Tzuan A. Chen
- University of Houston, Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, 3657 Cullen Blvd Stephen Power Farish Hall, Houston, TX 77204, United States
- University of Houston, HEALTH Research Institute, 4349 Martin Luther King Blvd, Houston, TX 77204, United States
| | - Isabel Martinez Leal
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Health Disparities Research, Unit 1440, 1400 Pressler Street, Houston, TX 77030, United States
- University of Houston, Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, 3657 Cullen Blvd Stephen Power Farish Hall, Houston, TX 77204, United States
- University of Houston, HEALTH Research Institute, 4349 Martin Luther King Blvd, Houston, TX 77204, United States
| | - Bryce Kyburz
- Integral Care, 1430 Collier St, Austin, TX 78704, United States
| | - Teresa Williams
- Integral Care, 1430 Collier St, Austin, TX 78704, United States
| | - Mayuri Patel
- Texas Department of State Health Services, Tobacco Prevention and Control Branch, 1100 West 49th Street, Mail Code 1965, Austin, TX 78756, United States
| | - Lorraine R. Reitzel
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Health Disparities Research, Unit 1440, 1400 Pressler Street, Houston, TX 77030, United States
- University of Houston, Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, 3657 Cullen Blvd Stephen Power Farish Hall, Houston, TX 77204, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fritz JM, Gibson B, Wetter DW, Fiol GD, Solis VH, Ford I, Lundberg K, Thackeray A. Use of implementation mapping in the planning of a hybrid type 1 pragmatic clinical trial: the BeatPain Utah study. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-3267087. [PMID: 37790359 PMCID: PMC10543377 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3267087/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
Background Considerable disparities in chronic pain management have been identified. Persons in rural, lower income and minoritized communities are less likely to receive evidence-based, nonpharmacologic care. Telehealth delivery of nonpharmacologic, evidence-based interventions for persons with chronic pain is a promising strategy to lessen disparities, but implementation comes with many challenges. The BeatPain Utah study is a hybrid type I effectiveness-implementation pragmatic clinical trial investigating telehealth strategies to provide nonpharmacologic care from physical therapists to persons with chronic back pain receiving care in Community Health Centers (CHCs). CHCs provide primary care to all persons regardless of ability to pay. This paper outlines the use of implementation mapping to develop a multifaceted implementation plan for the BeatPain study. Methods During a planning year for the BeatPain trial we developed a comprehensive logic model including the 5-step implementation mapping process informed by additional frameworks and theories. The five iterative implementation mapping steps were addressed in the planning year; 1) conduct needs assessments for involved groups; 2) identify implementation outcomes, performance objectives and determinants; 3) select implementation strategies; 4) produce implementation protocols and materials; and 5) evaluate implementation outcomes. Results CHC leadership/providers, patients and physical therapists were identified as involved groups. Barriers and assets were identified across groups which informed identification of performance objectives necessary to implement two key processes; 1) electronic referral of patients with back pain in CHC clinics to the BeatPain team; and 2) connecting patients with physical therapists providing telehealth. Determinants of the performance objectives for each group informed our choice of implementation strategies which focused on training, education, clinician support and tailoring physical therapy interventions for telehealth delivery and cultural competency. We selected implementation outcomes for the BeatPain trial to evaluate the success of our implementation strategies. Conclusions Implementation mapping provided a comprehensive and systematic approach to develop an implementation plan during the planning phase for our ongoing hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial. We will be able to evaluate the implementation strategies used in the BeatPain Utah study to inform future efforts to implement telehealth delivery of evidence-based pain care in CHCs and other settings. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04923334. Registered June 11, 2021 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04923334.
Collapse
|
5
|
Shorey Fennell B, Cottrell-Daniels C, Hoover DS, Spears CA, Nguyen N, Piñeiro B, McNeill LH, Wetter DW, Vidrine DJ, Vidrine JI. The implementation of ask-advise-connect in a federally qualified health center: a mixed methods evaluation using the re-aim framework. Transl Behav Med 2023; 13:551-560. [PMID: 37000697 PMCID: PMC10415728 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibad007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Ask-Advise-Connect (AAC) efficiently links smokers in healthcare settings with evidence-based Quitline-delivered tobacco treatment through training clinic staff to systematically ask patients about smoking status, advise smokers to quit, and connect patients with state Quitlines using the electronic health record. This study utilized a mixed-methods approach, guided by the RE-AIM framework, to evaluate the implementation of AAC in a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC). AAC was implemented for 18 months at a FQHC serving primarily low-socioeconomic status (SES) Latinos and Latinas. Results are presented within the RE-AIM conceptual framework which includes dimensions of reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. Quantitative patient-level outcomes of reach, effectiveness, and Impact were calculated. Post-implementation, in-depth interviews were conducted with clinic leadership and staff (N = 9) to gather perceptions and inform future implementation efforts. During the implementation period, 12.0% of GNHC patients who reported current smoking both agreed to have their information sent to the Quitline and were successfully contacted by the Quitline (Reach), 94.8% of patients who spoke with the Quitline enrolled in treatment (Effectiveness), and 11.4% of all identified smokers enrolled in Quitline treatment (Impact). In post-implementation interviews assessing RE-AIM dimensions, clinic staff and leadership identified facilitators and advantages of AAC and reported that AAC was easy to learn and implement, streamlined existing procedures, and had a positive impact on patients. Staff and leadership reported enthusiasm about AAC implementation and believed AAC fit well in the clinic. Staff were interested in AAC becoming the standard of care and made suggestions for future implementation. Clinic staff at a FQHC serving primarily low-SES Latinos and Latinas viewed the ACC implementation process positively. Findings have implications for streamlining clinical smoking cessation procedures and the potential to reduce tobacco-related disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Claire A Spears
- Division of Health Promotion and Behavior, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Nga Nguyen
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bárbara Piñeiro
- Centre d’Estudis Demogràfics, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Lorna H McNeill
- Department of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David W Wetter
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Center for Health Outcomes and Population Equity, Huntsman Cancer Institute and the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Damon J Vidrine
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jennifer I Vidrine
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wachira C, Ogallo W, Okwako S, Remy SL, Bukania Z, Njeru MK, Mwangi M, Mokua S, Omwanda W, Ressler D, Walcott-Bryant A. Analysis of user interactions with a digital health wallet for enabling care continuity in the context of an ongoing pandemic. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2023; 30:674-682. [PMID: 36645248 PMCID: PMC10018250 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocad004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The onset of COVID-19 and related policy responses made it difficult to study interactive health informatics solutions in clinical study settings. Instrumented log and event data from interactive systems capture temporal details that can be used to generate insights about care continuity during ongoing pandemics. OBJECTIVE To investigate user interactions with a digital health wallet (DHW) system for addressing care continuity challenges in chronic disease management in the context of an ongoing pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed user interaction log data generated by clinicians, nurses, and patients from the deployment of a DHW in a feasibility study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic in Kenya. We used the Hamming distance from Information Theory to quantify deviations of usage patterns extracted from the events data from predetermined workflow sequences supported by the platform. RESULTS Nurses interacted with all the user interface elements relevant to triage. Clinicians interacted with only 43% of elements relevant to consultation, while patients interacted with 67% of the relevant user interface elements. Nurses and clinicians deviated from the predetermined workflow sequences by 42% and 36%, respectively. Most deviations pertained to users going back to previous steps in their usage workflow. CONCLUSIONS User interaction log analysis is a valuable alternative method for generating and quantifying user experiences in the context of ongoing pandemics. However, researchers should mitigate the potential disruptions of the actual use of the studied technologies as well as use multiple approaches to investigate user experiences of health technology during pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Zipporah Bukania
- Centre for Public Health—Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Mercy Karimi Njeru
- Centre for Public Health—Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Moses Mwangi
- Centre for Public Health—Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Sharon Mokua
- Centre for Public Health—Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Electronic health record closed-loop referral ("eReferral") to a state tobacco quitline: a retrospective case study of primary care implementation challenges and adaptations. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:107. [PMID: 36209149 PMCID: PMC9548147 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00357-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health system change can increase the reach of evidence-based smoking cessation treatments. Proactive electronic health record (EHR)-enabled, closed-loop referral ("eReferral") to state tobacco quitlines increases the rates at which patients who smoke accept cessation treatment. Implementing such system change poses many challenges, however, and adaptations to system contexts are often required, but are understudied. This retrospective case study identified adaptations to eReferral EHR tools and implementation strategies in two healthcare systems. METHODS In a large clustered randomized controlled trial (C-RCT; NCT02735382) conducted in 2016-2017, 11 primary care clinics in two healthcare systems implemented quitline eReferral, starting with 1 pilot clinic per system followed by 2 phases of implementation (an experimental phase in 5-6 test clinics per system and then a system-wide dissemination phase in both systems). Adaptations were informed by stakeholder input from live trainings, follow-up calls and meetings in the first month after eReferral launch, emails, direct observation by researchers, and clinic staff survey responses. Retrospective, descriptive analysis characterized implementation strategy modifications and adaptations using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies (FRAME-IS). A pre- and post-implementation survey assessed staff ratings of eReferral acceptability and implementation barriers and facilitators. FINDINGS Major modifications to closed-loop eReferral implementation strategies included aligning the eReferral initiative with other high-priority health system objectives, modifying eReferral user interfaces and training in their use, modifying eReferral workflows and associated training, and maintaining and enhancing interoperability and clinician feedback functions. The two health systems both used Epic EHRs but used different approaches to interfacing with the quitline vendor and integrating eReferral into clinician workflows. Both health systems engaged in iterative refinement of the EHR alert prompting eReferral, the eReferral order, trainings, and workflows. Staff survey comments suggested moderate acceptability of eReferral processes and identified possible targets for future modifications in eReferral, including reducing clinician burden related to EHR documentation and addressing clinicians' negative beliefs about patient receptivity to cessation treatment. CONCLUSIONS System-wide implementation of tobacco quitline eReferral in primary care outpatient clinics is feasible but requires extensive coordination across stakeholders, tailoring to local health system EHR configurations, and sensitivity to system- and clinic-specific workflows. TRIAL REGISTRATION www. CLINICALTRIALS gov, NCT02735382 . Registered on 12 August 2016.
Collapse
|
8
|
Schlechter CR, Del Fiol G, Lam CY, Fernandez ME, Greene T, Yack M, Schulthies S, Nelson M, Bohner C, Pruhs A, Siaperas T, Kawamoto K, Gibson B, Nahum-Shani I, Walker TJ, Wetter DW. Application of community - engaged dissemination and implementation science to improve health equity. Prev Med Rep 2022; 24:101620. [PMID: 34976676 PMCID: PMC8684008 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Community engagement is critical to accelerate and improve implementation of evidence-based interventions to reduce health inequities. Community-engaged dissemination and implementation research (CEDI) emphasizes engaging stakeholders (e.g., community members, practitioners, community organizations, etc.) with diverse perspectives, experience, and expertise to provide tacit community knowledge regarding the local context, priorities, needs, and assets. Importantly, CEDI can help improve health inequities through incorporating unique perspectives from communities experiencing health inequities that have historically been left out of the research process. The community-engagement process that exists in practice can be highly variable, and characteristics of the process are often underreported, making it difficult to discern how engagement of community partners was used to improve implementation. This paper describes the community-engagement process for a multilevel, pragmatic randomized trial to increase the reach and impact of evidence-based tobacco cessation treatment among Community Health Center patients; describes how engagement activities and the resulting partnership informed the development of implementation strategies and improved the research process; and presents lessons learned to inform future CEDI research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsey R. Schlechter
- Center for Health Outcomes and Population Equity, University of Utah and Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Address: 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States
- Corresponding author.
| | - Guilherme Del Fiol
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way #140, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States
| | - Cho Y. Lam
- Center for Health Outcomes and Population Equity, University of Utah and Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Address: 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States
| | - Maria E. Fernandez
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Department of Health Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, 7000 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Tom Greene
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Address: 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States
| | - Melissa Yack
- Center for Health Outcomes and Population Equity, University of Utah and Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States
| | - Sandra Schulthies
- Utah Department of Health, 288 N 1460 W, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, United States
| | - Marci Nelson
- Utah Department of Health, 288 N 1460 W, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, United States
| | - Claudia Bohner
- Utah Department of Health, 288 N 1460 W, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, United States
| | - Alan Pruhs
- Association for Utah Community Health, 860 E 4500 S, Murray, UT 84107, United States
| | - Tracey Siaperas
- Association for Utah Community Health, 860 E 4500 S, Murray, UT 84107, United States
| | - Kensaku Kawamoto
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way #140, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States
| | - Bryan Gibson
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way #140, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States
| | - Inbal Nahum-Shani
- Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 426 Thompson St, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, United States
| | - Timothy J. Walker
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Department of Health Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, 7000 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - David W. Wetter
- Center for Health Outcomes and Population Equity, University of Utah and Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Address: 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States
| |
Collapse
|