Providing domperidone throughout lactation enhances sow lactation performance

Reproductive health of the sow during puerperium

The modern hyperprolific sow is susceptible to metabolic disease and chronic inflammation. The most sensitive phase is parturition, when the sow experiences systemic inflammation and stress, and major changes in metabolism and endocrinology. Resolution of inflammation and stress needs to happen quickly to ensure good reproductive health during puerperium. If the sow fails to adapt to these changes, puerperal disease may occur. The economically most important puerperal disease complex is the postpartum dysgalactia syndrome (PPDS). Other puerperal diseases include infections of the urogenital tract. Diagnosis of PPDS and urogenital disease on-farm is challenging but several diagnostic methods, including clinical examination, behavioral observations, ultrasonography and biomarkers are available. Ultrasonography is an excellent tool for monitoring the health of the urogenital tract, the mammary gland, and uterine involution and guide further diagnostic interventions. Biomarkers such as Chromogranin A, tumor necrosis factor-α, and interleukin-6 represent promising tools to monitor general health and the systemic state of inflammation and oxidative stress of the sow. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, dopamine antagonists, and oxytocin are promising to address the symptoms of PPDS. Reducing of stress, improving nutrition and intestinal health, and supporting animal welfare-friendly husbandry help in the prevention of PPDS.

Oral administration of domperidone in the first or third week of lactation: effects on prolactin concentrations and mammary gene expression in sows and piglet growth

The scope of the present study is endocrine and metabolic control of sow lactation. This project aimed to determine the impact of increasing prolactin concentrations via oral administration of the dopamine receptor antagonist domperidone in the first or third week of lactation in sows. Effects on sow hormonal and metabolic status, lactational performance, and gene expression in mammary epithelial cells were determined. Primiparous sows were divided in 3 treatments: 1) 10 mL of vehicle (table syrup) per os twice daily during the first and third weeks of lactation (Control, CTL, n = 23), 2) 0.5 mg/kg of domperidone per os twice daily during the first week of lactation (LACT1, n = 23), or 3) 0.5 mg/kg of domperidone given per os twice daily during the third week of lactation (LACT3, n = 22). Treated sows also received 10 mL of the vehicle twice daily during the other treatment period. Litter size was standardized to 12 ± 1 and piglets were weighed at birth, 24 h, and on d 8, 15, 22 (weaning), 35, and 56. Sow feed intake was recorded daily. Representative milk samples were obtained on d 7 and 21 of lactation for compositional analyses, and milk fat globules were used to measure mRNA abundances of various genes. Jugular blood samples were obtained from sows on d 1, 7, 14, and 21 of lactation to measure concentrations of prolactin, IGF-1, insulin, urea, and FFA. Concentrations of prolactin were increased (P < 0.01) at the end of the 7-d treatment period with domperidone, whether imposed in the first (LACT1) or third (LACT 3) week of lactation. No other blood variables were affected by treatments and neither was milk composition (P > 0.10). Sow BW, backfat thickness, or feed intake were not altered by treatments (P > 0.10), but piglet BW tended to be greater in litters from LACT3 compared with CTL sows on d 22 and 35 (P ≤ 0.10). Gene expression of EGF in milk fat globules tended to be (LACT1, P < 0.10) or was increased (LACT3, P < 0.05) after treatment, and the effect in LACT1 sows was maintained until d 21 of lactation. The mRNA abundance of SPP1 was increased (P < 0.05) in LACT1 vs CTL sows on d 7, and that of 3 major milk proteins tended to be (CSN1S2 and WAP, P < 0.10) or was greater (LALBA, P < 0.05) in LACT3 vs CTL sows on d 21 of lactation. Oral administration of domperidone during the first or third week of lactation increased prolactin concentrations and altered mRNA abundances of selected genes in milk fat globules. Yet, only the LACT 3 treatment positively affected piglet performance.

Prolactin and the swine mammary gland

Prolactin is a hormone that is most important for mammary development in swine. It is also essential for both the onset and the maintenance of lactation. In early studies, exogenous recombinant porcine prolactin was used to detect its biological effects on mammary tissue. In these studies, a stimulatory role of prolactin for mammary development of prepubertal gilts was demonstrated. However, when injected throughout lactation, prolactin did not increase sow milk yield likely because mammary receptors were saturated. The secretion of prolactin is largely under negative regulation via dopamine. Inhibition studies using the dopamine agonist bromocriptine showed that prolactin is required in the last third of gestation to sustain mammary development in gilts. When creating a hyperprolactinemic state during that same period, with the dopamine antagonist domperidone, differentiation of mammary epithelial cells was stimulated and milk yield in the subsequent lactation was increased. Domperidone given throughout lactation also led to greater milk yield. A study using domperidone in prepubertal gilts, however, did not reproduce the stimulatory effect of exogenous prolactin on mammary development and demonstrated that timing of the prolactin increase in relation to age of the animals is most important to elicit a response on mammary tissue. Attempts were made to use feed ingredients such as the plant extract from milk thistle, sylimarin, to stimulate prolactin secretion in sows. However, even though prolactin concentrations were increased, this augmentation was not important enough to have an impact on mammary development in late gestation or to increase milk yield. The current knowledge that hyperprolactinemia has beneficial effects for mammary development at various physiological stages and can enhance milk yield in swine leads to new avenues in elaborating strategies that could be used at the farm level to improve sow lactation performance.