Blood Concentrations of Designer Benzodiazepines: Relation to Impairment and Findings in Forensic Cases

Toxicology findings from drivers suspected of drug-impaired driving in Ontario (2008-2019)

OBJECTIVE

This study examines the results of toxicological tests performed on blood and urine samples collected from suspected drug-impaired drivers in Ontario from 2008 to 2019. The report examines the results of toxicological analysis of the samples submitted, the characteristics of those drivers from whom samples were collected, and the temporal and situational circumstances that led to police investigations and sample collection to better understand drug-impaired driving behavior and to assist in the development and implementation of countermeasure strategies and programs.

METHODS

Blood and urine samples were sent to the Center of Forensic Sciences where they were analyzed using standardized comprehensive toxicological analysis to test for a wide variety of potentially impairing drugs. Demographic and temporal information for each case from which a sample was collected were also examined to describe the circumstances and characteristics of these driving incidents.

RESULTS

During the 12-year period examined, 5,388 samples collected from suspected drug-impaired drivers were analyzed. The number of samples collected increased substantially following the implementation of the Drug Evaluation and Classification Program (DECP) in July 2008, the enactment of legislation facilitating the collection of blood samples from suspects, and the legalization of cannabis for nonmedical purposes in 2018. The number of samples submitted shows temporal correlation with the number of police officers certified as Drug Recognition Experts (DRE) in the province. Over the 12-year period of this study, cannabis was the most frequently detected substance in drivers (52.8% of cases), followed by cocaine (44.3%) and methamphetamine (24.8%). In 80% of cases, more than one substance was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Examining the characteristics of suspected drug-impaired drivers, the temporal circumstances, and the drug findings throughout the large geographic area of Ontario and over the extended period of this study enhances our understanding of drug-impaired driving behavior. These characteristics can assist in the development and/or evaluation of enforcement strategies and enhanced countermeasure activities.

Bibliometric evaluation of Journal of Analytical Toxicology as a scholarly publication according to the Web-of-Science citation database

Soon approaching its 50th anniversary, Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international scholarly publication specializing in analytical and forensic aspects of toxicology. Science Citation Index (SCI) and Journal Citation Reports (JCR), both of which are part of the Web-of-Science (WOS) database, were used to make a bibliometric evaluation of JAT articles. Between 1977 (volume 1) and 2023 (volume 47), a total of  n = 4,785 items were published in JAT; the top-ten most highly cited articles and the most prolific authors were identified. Changes in the journal impact factor (JIF) were studied between 1997 and 2022, and this metric varied from a low of 1.24 (2006) to a high of 3.36 (2020).The most recent JIF (2022) dropped to 2.5 and the corresponding 5 year JIF was 2.6. JAT's most highly cited article (590 cites) was a working group (SWGTOX) report dealing with standard practices for the validation of analytical methods in forensic toxicology laboratories. JAT published 62 articles each of which were cited over 100 times and the H-index for JAT was 89. The most prolific author of JAT articles was credited with 119 items, the first in 1980 (volume 4) and the latest in 2023 (volume 47). JAT articles were cited 4,537 times in 2022 by all journals in the JCR database, although 520 of these were self-citations (11.5%). Bibliometric methods are increasingly used to evaluate the published work of individual scientists, university departments, entire universities and whole countries. Highly cited articles are considered more influential and authoritative compared with papers that are seldom or never cited.

[Personalized character of toxic effects through mass nonlethal poisoning by phenazepam and other psychoactive substances]

Over several months, 14 people were admitted in 6 hospitals with severe symptoms of intoxication with psychoactive substances as a result of mass poisoning. All symptoms occurred after taking a drink that contained crushed phenazepam tablets. Samples of blood (n=10) and urine (n=6) taken from 14 sufferers for forensic, chemical and toxicological examination were analyzed using the HPLC-MS/MS method. Phenazepam was detected in the biomaterial of all 14 patients. Other psychoactive substances (baclofen, pregabalin, chlorprothixene, chlorpromazine, phenibut, tramadol, diazepam), narcotic substances and ethanol were also found in the sufferers. The phenazepam concentration in the blood was in the range of 109.75-786.50 ng/ml, in the urine - 8.97-101.28 ng/ml. The pharmacokinetic and toxicokinetic characteristics of toxicants as well as additional factors characterizing the phenotype of the sufferer in addition to drug's content in the biological material must be taken into account to determine the toxicity level of phenazepam against the background of combined action with other psychoactive substances.

Post mortem blood bromazolam concentrations and co-findings in 96 coronial cases within England and Wales

Bromazolam is a newly emerging benzodiazepine drug which is not licensed for medicinal use. It may be sourced as a New Psychoactive Substance (NPS) for its desired effects or be consumed unknowingly via counterfeit Xanax® or Valium® preparations. As part of our Coronial workload, we observed an increase in the detection of bromazolam from September 2021 to November 2022. We report a series of 96 cases in which bromazolam was quantitated by high resolution accurate mass - mass spectrometry (HRAM - MS) in post-mortem blood. The mean (SD) post-mortem blood bromazolam concentration from our case series was 64.6 ( ± 79.4) µg/L (range <1-425 µg/L). Routine toxicological screening results have also been reported; the most commonly encountered drugs taken in combination with bromazolam were cocaine, gabapentinoids and diazepam. In 48% of cases at least one further designer benzodiazepine drug was also present (etizolam, flualprazolam, flubromazolam, flubromazepam). It is essential that laboratories providing toxicological investigations are aware of the limitations of their assays; and inclusion of bromazolam within targeted screening panels using LC-MS/MS is encouraged. Bromazolam has not been associated with death in isolation from resulting toxic concentrations; however, it is likely to enhance adverse clinical effects when taken in combination with stimulant and/or centrally-acting depressant drugs (poly-drug deaths). Bromazolam, similar to other benzodiazepines, may also impair cognition and decision making skills.

Designer benzodiazepine dependence and the difficulties of outpatient management; a case report

BACKGROUND

Novel psychoactive substances, such as designer benzodiazepines (DBZD), are a growing public health concern. There are about 30 different DZBDs reported, which can vary widely in their effect and potential for harmful outcomes, ranging from agitation to confusion to coma. Despite the scope of this widespread phenomena, little information on the management of DBZD dependence is available in the literature.

CASE

In this case report, we present a patient with DBZD dependence requesting assistance tapering off the DBZD, clonazolam. He began self-medicating with clonazolam seven years prior for panic attacks to the point he was using 40 drops per day and having significant withdrawal during the day. He was prescribed gabapentin for his underlying anxiety while he tapered his clonazolam dose. Once he achieved a 75% reduction in his use of clonazolam, he had trouble managing withdrawal and anxiety symptoms and could not taper further.

DISCUSSION

We discuss the challenges of treating patients with DBZD use disorder in an outpatient setting. Switching a patient from a DZBD to a prescription benzodiazepine for the purposes of a taper can be dangerous as an outpatient due to the inability to monitor at-home DBZD usage and the resulting risk of overdose. DBZDs can also be highly potent and make it difficult to achieve success using current withdrawal guidelines.

Recent findings and advancements in the detection of designer benzodiazepines: a brief review

This review article takes a closer look at a new class of psychoactive substances called designer benzodiazepines (DBZs) and the challenges of their detection. These are adinazolam, clonazolam, deschloroetizolam, diclazepam, etizolam, flualprazolam, flubromazepam, flubromazolam, phenazepam, and pyrazolam. They are central nervous system depressants and sedatives that can cause psychomotor impairment and increase the overdose risk when combined with other sedatives. DBZs undergo phase I and II metabolism similar to traditional benzodiazepines, but their specific metabolic pathways and the influence of genetic polymorphisms are yet to be clarified. Advances in liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) have enhanced the method's sensitivity for DBZs and their metabolites in biological samples and coupled with improved blood sampling methods require less blood for drug monitoring. Further research should focus on elucidating their pharmacokinetic properties and metabolism in humans, especially in view of genetic polymorphisms and drug interactions that could inform clinical treatment choices. Even though we have witnessed important advances in DBZ detection and measurement, further refinements are needed to expand the scope of detectable DBZs and their metabolites. All this should help toxicological research to better identify and characterise the risks of chronic and polydrug abuse and facilitate clinical, forensic, and regulatory responses to this growing issue.

Flualprazolam and flubromazolam: Blood concentrations and prevalence of two novel psychoactive substances in forensic case work in Ontario, Canada

Flualprazolam and flubromazolam are synthetic benzodiazepines that have not been approved for use in humans. They are categorized as novel psychoactive substances (NPS), and have been increasingly encountered in forensic case work. This report examines information from cases analyzed for flualprazolam and flubromazolam between July 1 and December 31, 2021 to identify the prevalence, trends and demographic data associated with these novel drugs in Ontario, Canada. Flualprazolam was identified in blood, serum or liver in 395 death investigations, 108 impaired driving and five sexual assault cases. Among all case types, blood concentrations were determined in 123 individuals aged 19-66 years. In impaired driving and sexual assault cases, flualprazolam blood concentrations ranged from <1.3 to 227 ng/mL (median 11.0 ng/mL), whereas a range of 3-59 ng/mL (median 6.8 ng/mL) was reported in death investigations. Flubromazolam was identified in blood, serum or liver in 137 death investigations, 55 impaired driving and one sexual assault case. Blood concentrations ranged from <1.3 to 323 ng/mL in 65 individuals, aged 14-61 years. In impaired driving and sexual assault cases, flubromazolam blood concentrations ranged from <1.3 to 323 ng/mL (median 7.7 ng/mL), which overlapped with the range of 2-220 ng/mL (median 8.0 ng/mL) reported in death investigations. Other drugs were frequently detected with flualprazolam and flubromazolam with opioids identified in more than 89% of positive flualprazolam and flubromazolam cases. These results demonstrated the prevalence of flualprazolam and flubromazolam in Ontario, Canada. Trends showed that over the 6-month period, as the number of flubromazolam cases decreased, the incidences of flualprazolam increased. An overlap in concentrations of these drugs was observed in both death investigations and cases involving living individuals. These data provide valuable information for the scientific community regarding the use of these drugs in antemortem and postmortem casework.

Increasing prevalence of designer benzodiazepines in impaired driving: A 5-year analysis from 2017 to 2021

Designer benzodiazepine (DBZD) use has been increasing over the past decade and poses a threat to human health and safety, particularly when involved in driving under the influence of drug (DUID) cases. Over a 5-year period between 2017 and 2021, there were 1,145 reported DBZDs in 805 blood samples submitted from law enforcement agencies for DUID testing. Eleven different DBZDs were detected, including three metabolite pairs: etizolam/alpha-hydroxyetizolam, clonazolam/8-aminoclonazolam, diclazepam/delorazepam, flualprazolam, flubromazolam, flubromazepam, bromazolam and bromazepam. Etizolam/alpha-hydroxyetizolam (n = 485) and flualprazolam (n = 149) were the most frequently detected DBZDs, at 60% and 18%, respectively. Driving behavior, standardized field sobriety test performance and physical observations of individuals suspected of DUIDs, whose blood sample was toxicologically confirmed for one or more DBZDs, were consistent with the effects caused by central nervous system depressants. Each DBZD has its own unique timeline, and toxicology testing had to be frequently updated to reflect the state of the novel psychoactive substance market. DBZDs play a role in impaired driving and can be the sole intoxicant in DUID cases.

Etizolam and Its Major Metabolites: A Short Review

Etizolam is a benzodiazepine (BZD). Etizolam is structurally different from BZDs as a thiophene replaces the benzene ring and a triazole ring is fused to the diazepine ring, but etizolam's pharmacological profile is similar. Etizolam has been used to treat anxiety and panic disorders, to reduce depressive and somatization symptoms and to induce muscle relaxation. Etizolam is used recreationally due to its reinforcing and sedative effects. Etizolam is available in tablet or powder form or administered on blotter paper that can be placed on the tongue for oral absorption. Etizolam metabolizes into two major metabolites: α-hydroxyetizolam and 8-hydroxyetizolam, and all three compounds can be detected in different biological specimens using various common analytical techniques such as immunoassay, chromatography and mass spectrometry. Etizolam is a controlled drug in many countries around the globe but is approved for medical use in some countries, such as Japan, South Korea and Italy. This work is a collation and review of available literature on etizolam to help improve the fundamental understanding of its toxicology, outline best analytical practice, and aid interpretation of toxicology results.

Designer benzodiazepines: an update

INTRODUCTION

Designer benzodiazepines (DBs) are a subclass of novel psychoactive substances (NPS). DBs mimic the properties of approved and prescribed benzodiazepines.

AREA COVERED

A systematic search of literature on DB classification, structure-activity relationships, pharmacologic properties, and adverse effects.

EXPERT OPINION

The prevalence of DB use has increased substantially over the last decade. All DBs are full-agonist ligands at the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A-benzodiazepine (GABA_A-BZ) receptor system. This is not surprising, since DBs largely represent either minor structural modifications, or well-recognized active metabolites, of existing approved benzodiazepines. As such, the pharmacologic profile and associated risks and hazards of DBs are similar or identical to clinically approved and legitimately prescribed benzodiazepines, most of which have been in use for decades. Concurrent use of DBs along with other abusable or recreational drugs (alcohol, opioids, cocaine, stimulants, hallucinogens, other sedative-hypnotics) represents the principal public health risk. The increasing illicit availability and use of DBs is of concern and requires regulatory attention, but DBs do not rank highly among designer psychotropic agents in terms of health risk to humans.

A Fatal Case Report Resulting from the Abuse of the Designer Benzodiazepines Clonazolam and Flualprazolam in Conjunction with Dried Opium Poppy Pods‡

Toxicologists are often confronted with the abuse of multiple drugs and are obliged to decide which compound may have been the cause of death. We report on a 21-year-old man (182 cm, 84 kg), who was found unconscious in his bed. Beside him, the police found several controlled substances, among them were dried opium poppy pods containing thebaine, codeine and morphine, a clear liquid with the designer benzodiazepines flualprazolam and clonazolam and a white powder with the imprint SGT-25, instead of SGT-78 (CUMYL-4CN-BINACA). These compounds were also found in the urine sample following a non-targeted gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and a targeted liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) screening approach. Subsequently, these compounds were quantified in whole femoral blood and scalp hair. Based on the concentrations measured in femoral blood in particular, we assume that the deceased had taken a lethal dose of the designer benzodiazepines-flualprazolam (0.74 mg/L) and clonazolam (2.08 mg/L), an extremely high dose of the opiates-thebaine (0.81 mg/L), codeine (0.23 mg/L) and morphine (0.13 mg/L ) and a high dose of the synthetic cannabinoid-CUMYL-4CN-BINACA (0.01 mg/L). Besides postmortem concentrations, we also present electron impact and electrospray ionization mass spectra of compounds found in the vicinity of the decedent, namely the tryptamines-4-hydroxy-N-isopropyl-N-methyltryptamine (4-HO-MIPT), 4-hydroxy-N-ethyl-N-methyltryptamine (4-HO-MET) and 4-acetoxy-N,N-diethyltryptamine (4-ACO-DET), the amphetamines-3-fluoroethamphetamine (3-FEA) and 2-fluoromethamphetamine (2-FMA) and the arylcyclohexylamines-N-ethyldeschloroketamine (O-PCE), 3-methoxyphencyclidine (3-MeO-PCP) and 3-methoxyeticyclidine (3-MeO-PCE).

Combined Use of Flubromazepam and Stimulants: Blood and Oral Fluid Concentrations and Impact on Driving Ability

"Designer" benzodiazepines (DBZDs) are becoming increasingly available in Europe, with the European Monitoring Centre of Drugs and Drug Addiction currently monitoring ∼30 new benzodiazepines. The following driving under the influence of drug (DUID) case describes the oral fluid (OF) and blood concentrations, as well as the observed effects after the combined use of stimulants and flubromazepam. Both OF, collected via the Intercept i2 collector (Immunalysis, Pomona, CA, USA), and blood (collected in containers with various stabilizers) were screened using a liquid chromatographic (LC) time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometric (MS-MS) method. In addition, various LC-MS-MS methods in multi-reaction monitoring mode were applied for confirmation and quantification. The OF and blood samples were taken 2 h 25 min and 9 h 19 min after the accident, respectively. OF contained 789 ng/mL amphetamine, 5,173 ng/mL MDMA, 168 ng/mL benzoylecgonine, 492 ng/mL cocaine, 134 ng/mL 4-methylmethcathinone (4-MMC) and traces of flubromazepam (less than limit of quantification (LLOQ); 2 ng/mL). The sodium-fluoride blood samples contained 19 ng/mL amphetamine, 284 ng/mL MDMA, 20 ng/mL MDA, 38 ng/mL benzoylecgonine, 4 ng/mL methylecgonine, 161 ng/mL flubromazepam and traces of 4-MMC (<LLOQ; 2.5 ng/mL). The driver was observed to have an irregular speed driving pattern and could not keep his lane. He demonstrated the following effects after the accident: bloodshot eyes, red face, sweating, fatigue, disorientation in time and space and mental confusion. Even 24 h after the accident, the driver was confused, disoriented, had red spots on his face and could not keep his balance. The effects of flubromazepam combined with several stimulants are demonstrated. Moreover, this case illustrates well the pros and cons of the different biological matrices applied in a DUID context. Differences between the biological matrices are not only observed concerning the ease/practicality of (on-site) collection, but also in the final drug detectability due to the large variations in OF/blood drug concentration ratios and metabolism/elimination rates as a result of the different chemical entities of the compounds.

Clonazolam Intoxication Case Report: Danger of Designer Benzodiazepines

ABSTRACT

Clonazolam is a derivative of the Xanax active ingredient, alprazolam. Classified as a designer benzodiazepine, clonazolam availability has been rising because of its circulation on illegal internet drug markets and marginal cost in comparison to its parent analogs. Clonazolam's accessibility encourages abuse prevalence and use of designer benzodiazepines. In our case, a 14-year-old male was found unresponsive the morning after ingesting multiple tablets believed to be Xanax. Toxicology testing indicated 140 ng/mL of 8-aminoclonazolam, a clonazolam metabolite, in the decedent's system. Alprazolam was not identified. Pathological analysis determined cerebral and respiratory depression to be the mechanism of death, resulting from acute clonazolam intoxication. This case presents the first death induced by clonazolam alone. Current literature identifies a gap in designer benzodiazepine confirmatory testing and a lack of awareness within the forensic and medical communities. Knowledge of designer benzodiazepines is needed to better understand their potency and to help prevent future intoxications. We present this case to aid in the recognition of novel benzodiazepines by medical examiners and coroners, to encourage their consideration in suspected Xanax and other substance related investigations, and to be aware of the capabilities of toxicological testing to improve novel benzodiazepine identification and subsequent interpretation.

Novel Designer Benzodiazepines: Comprehensive Review of Evolving Clinical and Adverse Effects

As tranquilizers, benzodiazepines have a wide range of clinical uses. Recently, there has been a significant rise in the number of novel psychoactive substances, including designer benzodiazepines. Flubromazolam(8-bromo-6-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-methyl-4H-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a][1,4]benzodiazeZpine) is a triazolo-analogue of flubromazepam. The most common effects noted by recreational users include heavy hypnosis and sedation, long-lasting amnesia, and rapid development of tolerance. Other effects included anxiolysis, muscle-relaxing effects, euphoria, loss of control, and severe withdrawals. Clonazolam, or 6-(2-chlorophenyl)-1-methyl-8-nitro-4H-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-α]-[1,4]-benzodiazepine, is a triazolo-analog of clonazepam. It is reported to be over twice as potent as alprazolam. Deschloroetizolam (2-Ethyl-9-methyl-4-phenyl-6H-thieno[3,2-f][1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a][1,4]diazepine) is part of the thienodiazepine drug class, which, like benzodiazepines, stimulates GABA-A receptors. Meclonazepam ((3S)-5-(2-chlorophenyl)-3-methyl-7-nitro-1,3-dihydro-1,4-benzodiazepin-2-one) is a designer benzodiazepine with additional anti-parasitic effects. Although it has proven to be an efficacious therapy for schistosomiasis, its sedative side effects have prevented it from being marketed as a therapeutic agent. The use of DBZs has been a subject of multiple recent clinical studies, likely related to increasing presence and availability on the internet drug market and lack of regulation. Many studies have aimed to identify the prevalence of DBZs and their effects on those using them. This review discussed these designer benzodiazepines and the dangers and adverse effects that the clinician should know.

Etizolam Blood Concentrations in 191 Forensic Cases in Ontario, Canada (2019-2020)

Although not used clinically in North America, etizolam has been identified in forensic samples as an illicit 'designer' benzodiazepine. As a central nervous system depressant, analysis for etizolam has probative value in both death investigations and forensic cases where incapacitation or human psychomotor performance is relevant. This report examines toxicological findings and demographic data in a series of authentic forensic cases analyzed between November 2019 and December 2020 in which etizolam was quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. Blood concentrations were determined in 191 individuals aged 1-75 years. In living individuals (i.e., impaired driving and sexual assaults), etizolam concentrations ranged from <5 to 767 ng/mL which overlapped with the range of <5 to 260 ng/mL reported in death investigations. In all but one case, other drugs were detected in combination with etizolam. Fentanyl was the most common co-occurring drug and was present in 164 cases (86%). Additional case details are provided for cases of forensic interest: two deaths involving children <3 years of age, two deaths involving body packing and an individual arrested for drug-impaired driving with, to our knowledge, the highest reported etizolam concentration to date.

The designer benzodiazepine, flubromazepam, induces reward-enhancing and cardiotoxic effects in rodents

The use of many benzodiazepines is controlled worldwide due to their high likelihood of abuse and potential adverse effects. Flubromazepam—a designer benzodiazepine—is a long-acting gamma-aminobutyric acid subtype A receptor agonist. There is currently a lack of scientific evidence regarding the potential for flubromazepam dependence or other adverse effects. This study aimed to evaluate the dependence potential, and cardiotoxicity via confirmation of the QT and RR intervals which are the factors on the electrical properties of the heart of flubromazepam in rodents. Using a conditioned place preference test, we discovered that mice treated intraperitoneally with flubromazepam (0.1 mg/kg) exhibited a significant preference for the flubromazepam-paired compartment, suggesting a potential for flubromazepam dependence. In addition, we observed several cardiotoxic effects of flubromazepam; 100-μM flubromazepam reduced cell viability, increased RR intervals but not QT intervals in the electrocardiography measurements, and considerably inhibited potassium channels in a human ether-à-go-go-related gene assay. Collectively, these findings suggest that flubromazepam may have adverse effects on psychological and cardiovascular health, laying the foundation for further efforts to list flubromazepam as a controlled substance at both national and international levels.

Fast and Sensitive Method for the Determination of 17 Designer Benzodiazepines in Hair by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry

In recent years, identification and analysis of designer benzodiazepines have become a challenge in forensic toxicology. These substances are analogues of the classic benzodiazepines, but their pharmacology is not well known, and many of them have been associated with overdoses and deaths. As a result, there has been a surge in efforts to develop analytical methods to determine these compounds in different biological samples. Our aim was to develop and validate a fast, sensitive, and specific method for determining 17 designer benzodiazepines (adinazolam, clobazam, clonazolam, delorazepam, deschloroetizolam, diclazepam, etizolam, flualprazolam, flubromazepam, flubromazolam, flunitrazolam, N-desmethylclobazam, nifoxipam, nitrazolam, meclonazepam, pyrazolam and zolazepam) in hair by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS). Hair samples were decontaminated, pulverized, and a 20-mg aliquot was incubated in methanol in an ultrasound bath (1h, 25ºC). The supernatant was evaporated and reconstituted in 200 µL of mobile phase, and the extracts were filtered (nano-filter vials) before injection into LC-MS-MS. All analytes eluted from the chromatographic column in 8 min, and two multiple-reaction monitoring (MRM) transitions were used to identify each compound. The limits of quantification were 5 or 25 pg/mg, depending on the analyte, and calibration functions were linear to 200 pg/mg. Imprecision was <19.2% (n = 15) and bias was from -13.7 up to 18.3% (n = 15). All the analytes yielded high extraction efficiencies >70%, and displayed ion suppression between -62.8% and -23.9% (n = 10). The method was applied to 19 authentic cases. Five samples were positive for flualprazolam (<LOQ - >200 pg/mg) and/or etizolam (47.4-88.5 pg/mg). In conclusion, the present validated method has proven to be fast, sensitive, specific, and capable of determining 17 designer benzodiazepines in hair using LC-MS-MS.

Reports of Adverse Events Associated with Use of Novel Psychoactive Substances, 2017-2020: A Review

An important role of modern forensic and clinical toxicologists is to monitor the adverse events of novel psychoactive substances (NPS). Following a prior review from 2013 to 2016, this critical literature review analyzes and evaluates published case reports for NPS from January 2017 through December 2020. The primary objective of this study is to assist in the assessment and interpretation of these cases as well as provide references for confirmation methods. Chemistry, pharmacology, adverse events and user profiles (e.g., polypharmacy) for NPS are provided including case history, clinical symptoms, autopsy findings and analytical results. Literature reviews were performed in PubMed and Google Scholar for publications using search terms such as NPS specific names, general terms (e.g., ‘designer drugs’ and ‘novel psychoactive substances’), drug classes (e.g., ‘designer stimulants’) and outcome-based terms (e.g., ‘overdose’ and ‘death’). Government and website drug surveillance databases and abstracts published by professional forensic science organizations were also searched. Toxicological data and detailed case information were extracted, tabulated, analyzed and organized by drug category. Case reports included overdose fatalities (378 cases), clinical treatment and hospitalization (771 cases) and driving under the influence of drugs (170 cases) for a total of 1,319 cases providing details of adverse events associated with NPS. Confirmed adverse events with associated toxidromes of more than 60 NPS were reported including synthetic cannabinoid, NPS stimulant, NPS hallucinogen, NPS benzodiazepine and NPS opioid cases. Fifty of these NPS were reported for the first time in January 2017 through December 2020 as compared to the previous 4 years surveyed. This study provides insight and context of case findings described in the literature and in digital government surveillance databases and websites during a recent 4-year period. This review will increase the awareness of adverse events associated with NPS use to better characterize international emerging drug threats.

The Evolution Toward Designer Benzodiazepines in Drug-Facilitated Sexual Assault Cases

Drug-facilitated sexual assault (DFSA) is a crime where the victim is unable to provide sexual consent due to incapacitation resulting from alcohol or drug consumption. Due to the large number of substances possibly used in DFSA, including illicit, prescription and over-the-counter drugs, DFSA faces many toxicological challenges. Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are ideal candidates for DFSA, as they are active at low doses, have a fast onset of action and can be easily administered orally. The last decade has seen the emergence of designer benzodiazepines (DBZDs), which show slight modifications compared with BZDs and similar pharmacological effects but are not controlled under the international drug control system. DBZDs represent an additional challenge due to the number of new entities regularly appearing in the market, their possibly higher potency and the limited knowledge available on their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics properties. Many BZDs and DBZDs have a short half-life, leading to rapid metabolism and excretion. The low concentrations and short time windows for the detection of BZD in body fluids require the use of highly sensitive analysis methods to enable the detection of drugs and their respective metabolites. This review discusses the current state of the toxicological analysis of BZDs and DBZDs in forensic casework and their pharmacokinetic properties (i.e., absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination), as well as their analysis in biosamples typically encountered in DFSA (i.e., blood, urine and hair).

The blood-to-plasma ratio and predicted GABAA-binding affinity of designer benzodiazepines

PURPOSE

The number of benzodiazepines appearing as new psychoactive substances (NPS) is continually increasing. Information about the pharmacological parameters of these compounds is required to fully understand their potential effects and harms. One parameter that has yet to be described is the blood-to-plasma ratio. Knowledge of the pharmacodynamics of designer benzodiazepines is also important, and the use of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modelling provides a fast and inexpensive method of predicting binding affinity to the GABA_A receptor.

METHODS

In this work, the blood-to-plasma ratios for six designer benzodiazepines (deschloroetizolam, diclazepam, etizolam, meclonazepam, phenazepam, and pyrazolam) were determined. A previously developed QSAR model was used to predict the binding affinity of nine designer benzodiazepines that have recently appeared.

RESULTS

Blood-to-plasma values ranged from 0.57 for phenazepam to 1.18 to pyrazolam. Four designer benzodiazepines appearing since 2017 (fluclotizolam, difludiazepam, flualprazolam, and clobromazolam) had predicted binding affinities to the GABA_A receptor that were greater than previously predicted binding affinities for other designer benzodiazepines.

CONCLUSIONS

This work highlights the diverse nature of the designer benzodiazepines and adds to our understanding of their pharmacology. The greater predicted binding affinities are a potential indication of the increasing potency of designer benzodiazepines appearing on the illicit drugs market.

Characteristics of fatal 'novel' benzodiazepine toxicity in Australia

INTRODUCTION

The study aimed to determine: 1. The characteristics of all recorded cases of fatal drug poisoning involving 'novel' benzodiazepines (NBZDs) in Australia; 2. The toxicology of cases; and 3. The major autopsy findings.

METHODS

Retrospective study of all deaths due to drug toxicity in Australia in which NBZDs were present in blood toxicology, retrieved from the National Coronial Information System (2000-2021). Information was collected on case characteristics, toxicology and major organ pathology.

RESULTS

A total of 40 cases were identified, the first occurring in 2015, with a median age of 26.5 years and 87.5% being male. Death was due to accidental toxicity in 92.5% of cases. There were extensive histories of substance use problems (80.0%) and mental health problems (32.5%). Etizolam was the most common NBZD (87.5%), followed by flubromazolam (15.0%), with other NBZDs detected in 20.0% (delorazepam, diclazepam, flualprazolam, flubromazepam, lormetazepam). Multiple NBZDs were present in 27.5%. Other drugs were present in 97.5%, most commonly opioids (70.0%), registered benzodiazepines (62.5%), psychostimulants (45.0%) and gabapentinoids (32.5%). A CNS depressant other than a NBZD was detected in 95.0% (n = 38). Autopsies were conducted and available for 30 cases, with pulmonary oedema (76.7%, n = 23), aspiration of vomitus (46.7%, n = 14) and acute bronchopneumonia (36.7%, n = 11) the most common diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

The 'typical' NBZD-related death was a young male who died due to accidental toxicity. Deaths most frequently involved etizolam and multiple substances, particularly depressants.

Urine Drug Screening in the Era of Designer Benzodiazepines: Comparison of Three Immunoassay Platforms, LC-QTOF-MS, and LC-MS/MS

This study investigated the presence of designer benzodiazepines in 35 urine specimens obtained from emergency department patients undergoing urine drug screening. All specimens showed apparent false-positive benzodiazepine screening results (i.e., confirmatory testing using a 19-component LC-MS/MS panel showed no prescribed benzodiazepines at detectable levels). The primary aims were to identify the possible presence of designer benzodiazepines, characterize the reactivity of commercially available screening immunoassays with designer benzodiazepines, and evaluate the risk of inappropriately ruling out designer benzodiazepine use when utilizing common urine drug screening and confirmatory tests. Specimens were obtained from emergency departments of a single US Health system. Following clinically ordered drug screening using Abbott ARCHITECT c assays and lab-developed LC-MS/MS confirmatory testing, additional characterization was performed for investigative purposes. Specifically, urine specimens were screened using two additional assays (Roche cobas c502, Siemens Dimension Vista) and LC-QTOF-MS to identify presumptively positive species, including benzodiazepines and non-benzodiazepines. Finally, targeted, qualitative LC-MS/MS was performed to confirm the presence of 12 designer benzodiazepines. Following benzodiazepine detection using the Abbott ARCHITECT, benzodiazepines were subsequently detected in 28/35 and 35/35 urine specimens, respectively, using Siemens and Roche assays. LC-QTOF-MS showed the presumptive presence of at least one non-FDA approved benzodiazepine in 30/35 specimens: flubromazolam (12/35), flualprazolam (11/35), flubromazepam (2/35), clonazolam (4/35), etizolam (9/35), metizolam (5/35), nitrazepam (1/35), and pyrazolam (1/35). Two or three designer benzodiazepines were detected concurrently in 13/35 specimens. Qualitative LC-MS/MS confirmed the presence of at least one designer benzodiazepine or metabolite in 23/35 specimens, with 3 specimens unavailable for confirmatory testing. Urine benzodiazepine screening assays from three manufacturers were cross-reactive with multiple non-US FDA-approved benzodiazepines. Clinical and forensic toxicology laboratories using traditionally designed LC-MS/MS panels may fail to confirm the presence of non-US FDA-approved benzodiazepines detected by screening assays, risking inappropriate interpretation of screening results as false-positives.

Driving under the Influence of Flualprazolam: 11 Case Reports

Eleven cases of suspected driving under the influence (DUI) of flualprazolam are presented. Data from police reports and drug recognition examinations (DRE), when available, were evaluated. In all cases, significant driving impairments were observed including weaving, driving slowly, stopping in the roadway, or collisions. Objective signs of impairment in all cases were generally consistent with those expected from central nervous system depressants. Both the mean and median blood flualprazolam concentrations were less than 15 ng/mL. Though comprehensive analysis was not performed on each specimen, the data from this study support the conclusion that flualprazolam at low concentrations may significantly impair the ability to safely drive.

A case of fatal multidrug intoxication involving flualprazolam: distribution in body fluids and solid tissues

Purpose

Designer benzodiazepines (DBZDs) increasingly emerged on the novel psychoactive substance (NPS) market in the last few years. They are usually sold as readily available alternatives to prescription benzodiazepines (BZDs) or added to counterfeit medicines. BZDs are generally considered relatively safe drugs due to the low risk of serious acute adverse effects in mono-intoxication, though e.g., alprazolam seems to display an elevated risk of respiratory depression. Here we report on a fatal intoxication involving the novel DBZD flualprazolam.

Methods

A complete postmortem examination was performed. General unknown screenings and analysis of drugs of abuse were performed on postmortem samples by immunoassay, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. The standard addition method was employed to quantify flualprazolam in postmortem blood and tissues. Finally, a toxicological significance score (TSS) was assigned.

Results

Flualprazolam was detected in heart serum (25.4 ng/mL) and peripheral blood (21.9 ng/mL) as well as in urine, stomach contents, brain, liver and kidney (65.2–323 ng/g). The cause of death was deemed as central nervous system (CNS) and respiratory depression with agonal aspiration of stomach contents, in the setting of a multiple drug intake. Given the concentration levels of the co-consumed CNS depressants, the contribution of flualprazolam to the death was considered likely (TSS of 3).

Conclusions

Our results support that highly potent DBZDs like flualprazolam carry an elevated risk for unintended toxicity, especially in association with other CNS depressants. A multidisciplinary evaluation of fatalities remains mandatory, especially when pharmacological/toxicological data on intoxicating compounds are lacking. To our knowledge this is the first report of flualprazolam concentrations in solid tissues in human.

Designer Benzodiazepines: A Review of Toxicology and Public Health Risks

The rising use of designer benzodiazepines (DBZD) is a cat-and-mouse game between organized crime and law enforcement. Non-prohibited benzodiazepines are introduced onto the global drug market and scheduled as rapidly as possible by international authorities. In response, DBZD are continuously modified to avoid legal sanctions and drug seizures and generally to increase the abuse potential of the DBZD. This results in an unpredictable fluctuation between the appearance and disappearance of DBZD in the illicit market. Thirty-one DBZD were considered for review after consulting the international early warning database, but only 3-hydroxyphenazepam, adinazolam, clonazolam, etizolam, deschloroetizolam, diclazepam, flualprazolam, flubromazepam, flubromazolam, meclonazepam, phenazepam and pyrazolam had sufficient data to contribute to this scoping review. A total of 49 reports describing 1 drug offense, 2 self-administration studies, 3 outpatient department admissions, 44 emergency department (ED) admissions, 63 driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) and 141 deaths reported between 2008 and 2021 are included in this study. Etizolam, flualprazolam flubromazolam and phenazepam were implicated in the majority of adverse-events, drug offenses and deaths. However, due to a general lack of knowledge of DBZD pharmacokinetics and toxicity, and due to a lack of validated analytical methods, total cases are much likely higher. Between 2019 and April 2020, DBZD were identified in 48% and 83% of postmortem and DUID cases reported to the UNODC, respectively, with flualprazolam, flubromazolam and etizolam as the most frequently detected substances. DBZD toxicology, public health risks and adverse events are reported.

Designer benzodiazepines versus prescription benzodiazepines: can structural relation predict the next step?

Designer benzodiazepines are a part of the recently discovered abuse synthetic drugs called Novel Psychoactive Substances (NPS) which need to be controlled due to their constantly growing market. Most of them are derived from the medically approved benzodiazepines used nowadays yet, may possess stronger effects, more toxicity, and longer durations of action. Some differences have also been observed in their detection and characteristics, in addition to the variations discovered in postmortem redistribution and drug stability. All these major alterations in features can result from only minor structural modifications. For example, a classic benzodiazepine (BZD) like diazepam only lacks one fluorine atom which exists in its derivatized designer drug, diclazepam, making substantial differences in activity. For this reason, it is essential to study the designer drugs in order to identify their dangers and distinguish them thus rule out their abuse and control the spread of such drugs. This review would highlight the distinct characteristics of some of the most commonly abused designer benzodiazepine analogies in relation to their original prescription BZD compounds.

Novel and Nonroutine Benzodiazepines and Suvorexant by LC-MS-MS

Benzodiazepines are a commonly prescribed class of drugs that have the potential for abuse. The Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office received drug seizure submissions that included novel and/or nonroutine benzodiazepines of increasing prevalence from 2017 to 2019. This prompted the development of a method of analysis for these compounds in biological specimens. The method tests for 16 novel and nonroutine benzodiazepines and suvorexant in whole blood by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS). The target analytes included bromazepam, clobazam, clonazolam, clotiazepam, diclazepam, estazolam, etizolam, flualprazolam, flubromazepam, flubromazolam, loprazolam, lormetazepam, phenazepam, prazepam, suvorexant, tetrazepam and triazolam. The method uses 200 µL of sample, protein precipitation and an instrument run-time of 8 min. The limit of detection was either 1 or 5 ng/mL and the limit of quantitation was either 5 or 25 ng/mL depending on the analyte. The method was validated for quantitative analysis for 15 out of the 17 analytes. Flubromazepam and prazepam were validated for qualitative identification only. A quadratic calibration model (r2 > 0.990) with 1/x weighting was used for all analytes for quantitative analysis. The calibration range was either 5-100 or 25-500 ng/mL depending on the analyte. The coefficient of variation of replicate analyses was within 14% and bias was within ±14%. The method provides a sensitive, efficient and robust procedure for the quantitation and/or qualitative identification of select novel and nonroutine benzodiazepines and suvorexant using LC-MS-MS and a sample volume of 200 µL.

Benzodiazepines reported in NFLIS-Drug, 2015 to 2018

The National Forensic Laboratory Information System (NFLIS) is a program of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, Diversion Control Division. The NFLIS-Drug component collects drug identification results and associated information from drug cases submitted to and analyzed by federal, state, and local forensic laboratories. This paper presents national annual estimates and national and regional yearly trend differences for clonazepam, diazepam, flubromazolam, clonazolam, and etizolam using annual report rates per 100,000 persons aged 15 or older between 2015 and 2018. An estimated 263,538 benzodiazepine reports were identified by state and local laboratories between 2015 and 2018. Methamphetamine, cocaine, and heroin accounted for 32% of the drugs reported in the same item as alprazolam. Depressants and tranquilizers and narcotic analgesics were the drug classes most frequently identified in the same item as etizolam. A timeline of some benzodiazepines’ emergence in NFLIS-Drug is shown, as well as state- and county-level data for selected benzodiazepines.

A fluorine turns a medicinal benzodiazepine into NPS: the case of flualprazolam

Purpose

The purpose of this review is to summarize the existing knowledge on flualprazolam, a novel ‘designer’ benzodiazepine that derives from the fluorination of the phenyl moiety in the ortho-position of alprazolam.

Methods

An extensive literature search was carried out in PubMed, Google Scholar and World Wide Web using relevant keywords. All articles found were gathered, and the available information is presented.

Results

This article reviews the existing knowledge on chemistry, pharmacology, toxicology, prevalence and current legal status of flualprazolam. Moreover, forensic and clinical cases where flualprazolam was involved worldwide, as well as flualprazolam seizures, along with the methods for its determination in biological samples are presented.

Conclusions

The recent flualprazolam-related cases have raised concerns to regulatory authorities and international stakeholders suggesting that flualprazolam should be under international control. The urgent international control of flualprazolam, despite the limited information on clinical effects and pharmacologic characteristics available, is an important measure for the prevention of its increasing abuse worldwide.

A comprehensive analytical process, from NPS threat identification to systematic screening: Method validation and one-year prevalence study

Several New Psychoactive Substances (NPS) enter the illicit drug market each year. This constant evolution of compounds to screen is challenging to law enforcement and drug chemists, and even more so to forensic toxicologists, who need to detect such compounds which might be at low concentrations in complex biological matrices. While some technological solutions are better suited than others to address such a challenge (e.g., high resolution mass spectrometry), laboratories with limited instrumental and financial resources are faced with a complex task: systematically screening for a rapidly evolving NPS panel using an accredited method run on standard equipment (e.g., liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)). This work presents a solution to this challenge: a complete workflow from the detection of a regional NPS threat to its implementation in a method accredited under the ISO 17025:2017 norm. Initial LC-MS/MS method included 55 NPS and metabolites (31 Novel Synthetic Opioids (NSO), 22 NSO metabolites and 2 designer benzodiazepines). Following their identification as relevant territorial threats, flualprazolam, then isotonitazene, were added to the contingent. By relying on development aiming for maximal integration to the current analysis workflow, systematic NPS screening using this method was easily implemented. Between March 2019 and March 2020, the 5 079 forensic cases analyzed in the province of Québec (Canada) revealed a NPS positivity rate of 3.4%. While 94% involved designer benzodiazepines, 5% involved NSO. This process, combining high efficiency, simple detection technology, ISO accreditation and rapid response to new threats resulted in a four-fold increase in NPS detection.

Flubromazolam-Derived Designer Benzodiazepines: Toxicokinetics and Analytical Toxicology of Clobromazolam and Bromazolam

Flubromazolam is widely known as highly potent designer benzodiazepine (DBZD). Recently, the two flubromazolam-derived new psychoactive substances (NPS) clobromazolam and bromazolam appeared on the drugs of abuse market. Since no information concerning their toxicokinetics in humans is available, the aims of the current study were to elucidate their metabolic profile and to identify the isozymes involved in their phase I and phase II metabolism. In vitro incubations with pooled human liver S9 fraction were performed and analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled to orbitrap-based high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC–HRMS-MS). Biosamples after the ingestion of bromazolam allowed the identification of metabolites in human plasma and urine as well as the determination of bromazolam plasma concentrations by LC–HRMS-MS using the standard addition method. In total, eight clobromazolam metabolites were identified in vitro as well as eight bromazolam metabolites in vitro and in vivo. Predominant metabolic steps were hydroxylation, glucuronidation and combinations thereof. Alpha-hydroxy bromazolam glucuronide and bromazolam N-glucuronide are recommended as screening targets in urine. Bromazolam and its alpha-hydroxy metabolite are recommended if conjugate cleavage is part of the sample preparation procedure. The bromazolam plasma concentrations were determined to be 6 and 29 μg/L, respectively. Several cytochrome P450 (CYP) and uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) isozymes were shown to catalyze their metabolic transformations. CYP3A4 was involved in the formation of all phase I metabolites of both NPS, while UGT1A4 and UGT2B10 catalyzed their N-glucuronidation. Several UGT isoforms catalyzed the glucuronidation of the hydroxy metabolites. In conclusion, the determined bromazolam plasma concentrations in the low micrograms per liter range underlined the need for sensitive analytical methods and the importance of suitable urine screening procedures including DBZD metabolites as targets. Such an analytical strategy should be also applicable for clobromazolam.