1
|
Xiong J, Zhao S, Zhang X, Tian Y, Ma L, Zhou Y, Huang C. Investigation of biodistribution by liquid-phase microextraction: Using a fatal diphenidol poisoning case. J Chromatogr A 2024; 1732:465221. [PMID: 39106662 DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2024.465221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Revised: 07/21/2024] [Accepted: 07/31/2024] [Indexed: 08/09/2024]
Abstract
Liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) possesses a high potential to isolate organic substances from different sample matrices. In this work, LPME was applied for the first time to investigate the biodistribution of diphenidol in different biofluids, organs, and brain regions using a fatal poisoning case. Since the LPME of diphenidol hasn't been reported, the effect of supported liquid membrane (SLM), acceptor and donor phases, and extraction time on LPME performance was investigated first. The solvents of 2-nonanone and 2-nitrophenyl octyl ether (NPOE) were found to be stable and efficient SLMs for LPME of diphenidol from biofluids and tissue samples, respectively. At steady state, the LPME recoveries for different sample matrices were in the range of 87 %-91 %. Due to the clean-up capability of LPME and the relatively high concentration of diphenidol in the fatal poisoning case, the proposed LPME systems were validated with related sample matrices using HPLC-UV for the determination. The methods displayed good linearity (R² ≥ 0.9943), and the limits of detection were 0.30 mg L-1, 0.28 mg L-1, and 2.7 μg g-1 for blood, urine, and liver samples, respectively. Meanwhile, the precision (≤13%), accuracy (90-110%), and matrices effect (±15%) were satisfactory at low, medium, and high concentrations. In addition, the stability, carryover, and dilution integrity met the requirements of ASB Standard 036. Finally, the proposed method was successfully applied to evaluate the biodistribution of diphenidol in five different biofluids, five organs, and six brain regions from a fatal poisoning case. Generally, the distribution of diphenidol in biofluids was lower than that in the organs and brain regions, and the highest concentration of diphenidol was observed in the liver, which is very important for the selection of inspection samples in forensic toxicological analysis. Therefore, LPME was proved to be a powerful tool for the investigation of biodistribution and postmortem redistribution in the fields of forensics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianhua Xiong
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Shuquan Zhao
- Faculty of Forensic Medicine, Guangdong Province Translational Forensic Medicine Engineering Technology Research Center, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Xinwei Zhang
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Yu Tian
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Longda Ma
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Yiwu Zhou
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
| | - Chuixiu Huang
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang L, Zhao J, Liu M, Li L, Yang H, Guo C, Hu J, Xiang P, Shen B, Qiao Z, Dang Y, Shi Y. Identifying metabolites of diphenidol by liquid chromatography-quadrupole/orbitrap mass spectrometry using rat liver microsomes, human blood, and urine samples. Drug Test Anal 2021; 13:1127-1135. [PMID: 33554459 DOI: 10.1002/dta.3012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Revised: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, diphenidol [1,1-diphenyl-4-piperidino-1-butanol] has been one of the drugs that appears in suicide cases, but there are few research data on its metabolic pathways and main metabolites. Metabolite identification plays a key role in drug safety assessment and clinical application. In this study, in vivo and in vitro samples were analyzed with ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole/electrostatic field orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometry. Structural elucidation of the metabolites was performed by comparing their molecular weights and product ions with those of the parent drug. As a result, 10 Phase I metabolites and 5 glucuronated Phase II metabolites were found in a blood sample and a urine sample from authentic cases. Three other Phase I metabolites were identified in the rat liver microsomes incubation solution. The results showed that the main metabolic pathways of diphenidol in the human body include hydroxylation, oxidation, dehydration, N-dealkylation, methylation, and conjugation with glucuronic acid. This study preliminarily clarified the metabolic pathways and main metabolites of diphenidol. For the development of new methods for the identification of diphenidol consumption, we recommend using M2-2 as a marker of diphenidol entering the body. The results of this study provide a theoretical basis for the pharmacokinetics and forensic scientific research of diphenidol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liu Yang
- Department of Forensic Toxicology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Shanghai Forensic Science Platform, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, China.,College of Medicine and Forensics, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, China
| | - Junbo Zhao
- Department of Forensic Toxicology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Shanghai Forensic Science Platform, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, China
| | - Mengxi Liu
- Department of Forensic Toxicology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Shanghai Forensic Science Platform, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, China
| | - Le Li
- Department of Forensic Toxicology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Shanghai Forensic Science Platform, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, China
| | - Huan Yang
- Department of Forensic Toxicology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Shanghai Forensic Science Platform, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, China
| | - Caixia Guo
- Department of Forensic Toxicology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Shanghai Forensic Science Platform, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing Hu
- Department of Forensic Toxicology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Shanghai Forensic Science Platform, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, China
| | - Ping Xiang
- Department of Forensic Toxicology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Shanghai Forensic Science Platform, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, China
| | - Baohua Shen
- Department of Forensic Toxicology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Shanghai Forensic Science Platform, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, China
| | - Zheng Qiao
- Department of Forensic Toxicology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Shanghai Forensic Science Platform, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, China
| | - Yonghui Dang
- College of Medicine and Forensics, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, China
| | - Yan Shi
- Department of Forensic Toxicology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Shanghai Forensic Science Platform, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|