Burn Care in the Street: A Survey of the Current Landscape of Burn Care Provided by Street Medicine Teams

People experiencing homelessness are at increased risk for serious burn injuries and face additional barriers to care such as inability to perform wound care and difficulty with follow-up. Although not burn-specific, street medicine (SM) programs provide direct medical care to people experiencing unsheltered homelessness in their own environment and may be well positioned to bridge this gap in burn care for this population. We conducted a cross-sectional survey to characterize the burn care experience of SM teams with providing burn care for people experiencing homelessness. The 60 respondents included 18 (30%) physicians, 15 (25%) nurse practitioners or physician assistants, 15 (25%) registered nurses, 6 (10%) medical students, and 6 (10%) other team members. The most common reported barriers to care were prior negative experiences with emergency departments, and transportation to burn centers. There was regional variability in frequency of providing burn care, which was reflected in respondent comfort with assessing and treating burns. Burns were most often dressed with daily dressings such as a non-adherent dressing over silver sulfadiazine or bacitracin. Silver-based contact dressings were rarely used. Street medicine teams in the United States are treating burn injuries among people experiencing homelessness, though management practices and experience treating burns was variable. As SM programs continue to grow, burn-related education, training, and connections to local burn centers for team members is important. Through strengthened partnerships between burn centers and street medicine teams, these programs may be well positioned to bridge the gap in burn care for people experiencing homelessness.

The Individual-Level and Community-Level Social Determinants of Burn Injuries: A Single-Institution Study From the Southwestern United States

Burn injuries are a significant public health concern, causing life-threatening complications and substantial hospitalization costs for patients. It has been shown that burn injuries may affect individuals differently based on demographic factors and socioeconomic status, among other variables. In the Southwestern United States with high ambient temperatures, specific burn etiologies, such as pavement burns, may pose a disproportionately high risk for disadvantaged communities and homeless individuals. This study uniquely explores burn injuries in relation to patients' socioeconomic status in Las Vegas, Nevada by using the Distressed Community Index to quantify socioeconomic status utilizing individual-level and community-level indicators. This single-institution and retrospective study collected data from all patients admitted to a burn center located in Las Vegas. Data were analyzed through Chi-square, one-way ANOVA, and post-hoc analysis with Tukey's test. Patients residing in distressed communities contributed to the greatest number of burn injuries; however, there was a lack of significant association between socioeconomic status and burn injury (P = 202). Additionally, specific burn etiologies and demographic characteristics were associated with variations in burn patient hospital course, complications, resources utilized and outcomes. Distressed patients were significantly associated with public insurance (P < 0.001), and public insurance users were associated with pavement burns-one of the most severe burn injuries (P < 0.001). This study emphasizes the importance of developing comprehensive burn prevention resources tailored to vulnerable populations, especially in regions with increased incidence of severe burn injuries, in order to reduce burn burden and mortality.

Association of houselessness and outcomes after traumatic injury: A retrospective, matched cohort study at an urban, academic level-one trauma center

BACKGROUND

Houselessness is associated with increased mortality and unmet health needs. Current understanding of traumatic injury in houseless patients is limited.

METHODS

This is a retrospective matched cohort study among houseless and housed adults, admitted to an urban, safety net, level I trauma center from 1/1/2018-12/31/2021. Houseless patients were matched with their housed counterparts 1:2 based on age, sex, injury severity score (ISS) and nature of injury. The primary outcome was in-hospital adverse events. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), outpatient follow-up, emergency department (ED) utilization post-injury, and readmission. Conditional multivariable regression was used to determine associations between the exposure and outcomes.

RESULTS

1413 patients were included; 471 houseless patients and 942 matched controls. Median [IQR] age was 42 years [31-58] and median [IQR] ISS was 9 [5-13] for all patients. About 30 % of traumatic injuries were violent in nature. Median [IQR] total LOS was longer for houseless patients (4.4 days [2.0-8.3] vs. 3.1 days [1.4-6.5], p < 0.001). Houseless patients were more frequently admitted to the ICU (5 % versus 3 %, p = 0.045). The rate of any in-hospital adverse event was similar (houseless 17 % vs. housed 16 %, p = 0.537). Adjusting for age, sex, language, insurance, ISS, nature of injury, injury mechanism, ICU admission, and operative intervention, houselessness was inversely associated with outpatient follow-up (OR 0.60, 95 % CI 0.46-0.79) and positively associated with ED representation (OR 2.49, 95 % CI 1.64-3.78) and hospital readmission (OR 4.35, 95 % CI 3.19-5.92).

CONCLUSIONS

Housing status was not associated with increased in-hospital morbidity or mortality in trauma patients in a single institution cohort of trauma patients. Unhoused patients had lower odds of completing outpatient injury-specific follow-up and higher odds of utilizing the ED within 30 days of discharge. These findings highlight gaps in post-discharge care coordination and underscore opportunities to improve discharge services for this population.

The Unhoused Burn Population: An Alarming Increase of Leaving Against Medical Advice

Unhoused burn patients (UBPs) have historically been more likely to leave against medical advice (AMA) and suffer worse health outcomes than the general population. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic created a major strain on the health care system, resulting in worse overall health outcomes for burn patients. We sought to investigate how COVID-19 impacted treatment for UBP, specifically the rate of leaving AMA. We conducted a retrospective chart analysis of patients admitted to a regional burn center between June 2015 and January 2023. March 1, 2020 was used as a cut point to separate the cohorts into patients seen pre-COVID-19 (p-CV) and during COVID-19 (CV). Outcomes included leaving treatment AMA and readmission within 30 days. In total, 385 patients met criteria for being unhoused and were included in our analytic sample, of which 199 were in the p-CV cohort and 186 in the CV cohort. UBP were significantly more likely to leave AMA during CV compared to p-CV (22.6% vs 7.5%, P < .001). Housed burn patients did not experience an increase in discharges AMA during this time period. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an increase in discharges AMA among unhoused patients only. While the etiology is unclear, our findings suggest that this vulnerable patient population is receiving inadequate care post-COVID. Future research should determine the driving force behind these increases and identify early interventions to mitigate them.

Factors associated with delayed admission to the burn unit: A major burn center's experience

BACKGROUND

Timely admission to the burn unit is crucial. Ideal burn care requires prompt interventions such as wound and body temperature management, infection control, and fluid resuscitation to prevent complications like burn progression and infection. In this study, we identify specific factors and outcomes associated with delayed admission to a regional burn center.

METHODS

Patients admitted to a large urban burn center from January 2015 to December 2023 were retrospectively queried, with subsequent collection of demographic and outcome variables from chart review. Descriptive statistics, Welch's t-tests of unequal variances, and Chi-square analysis were performed. Multiple logistic regression was performed to explore the association between delayed admission and ICU stay, ventilator requirements, and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 3137 patients were included in the study. Approximately 63.4 % of patients were admitted within 24 h, while 36.6 % had a significant delay in care of over 24 h after injury. Male patients were likely to experience delayed admission (39.0 vs. 31.8 %, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in age between the two cohorts (38.6 vs. 39.7 years, p = 0.199). There was no significant difference in time to admission by racial background (p = 0.061). Total body surface area burned (TBSA) varied between the delayed and control cohorts (15.5±18.7 % vs. 8.2±12.9 %, p < 0.001). Patients who were single (p < 0.001) and lived alone (p = 0.011) were more likely to experience a delay in burn unit admission. Homelessness (p < 0.001), substance abuse disorder (p < 0.001), and uninsured status (p < 0.001) were also associated with delayed admission. In regression analysis when controlling for TBSA, delay in care was significantly associated with a greater requirement for ICU stay (p < 0.001) and mechanical ventilation (p = 0.021) but was not associated with increased mortality (p = 0.232).

CONCLUSION

Sociodemographic variables such as homelessness, lack of social support, and substance abuse are associated with delayed burn unit admission. Knowledge of these factors can inform future interventions to improve outcomes for vulnerable patients, promoting better recovery and long-term outcomes after burn injury.

Association of Homelessness with Before Medically Advised Discharge After Surgery

BACKGROUND

Before medically advised (BMA) discharge, which refers to patients leaving the hospital at their own discretion, is associated with higher rates of readmission and death in other settings. It is not known if housing status is associated with this phenomenon after surgery.

METHODS

We identified all admitted adults who underwent an operation by one of 11 different surgical services at a single tertiary care hospital between January 2013 and June 2022. Chi-square tests and t-tests were used to compare demographic and clinical features between BMA discharges and standard discharges. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between housing status and BMA discharge, adjusting for demographic and admission characteristics. Documented reasons for BMA discharge were also abstracted from the medical record.

RESULTS

Of 111,036 patient admissions, 242 resulted in BMA discharge (0.2%). After adjusting for observable confounders, patients experiencing homelessness had substantially higher odds of BMA discharge after surgery (adjusted odds ratio 4.4, 95% confidence interval 3.0-6.4; p < 0.001) when compared to housed. Patients who underwent emergency surgery, patients with a documented substance use disorder, and those insured by Medicaid also had significantly higher odds of BMA discharge. System- or provider-related reasons (including patient frustration with the hospital environment, challenges in managing substance dependence, and perceived inadequacy of paint control) were documented in 96% of BMA discharges for patients experiencing homelessness (vs. 66% in housed patients).

CONCLUSION

BMA discharge is more common in patients experiencing homelessness after surgery even after adjusting for observable confounding characteristics. Deeper understanding of the drivers of BMA discharge in patients experiencing homelessness through qualitative methods are critical to promote more equitable and effective care.

Ankle fracture surgery in patients experiencing homelessness: a national evaluation of one-year rates of reoperation

Objectives

To evaluate the impact of homelessness on surgical outcomes following ankle fracture surgery.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Mariner claims database.

Patients/Participants

Patients older than 18 years who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of ankle fractures between 2010 and 2021. A total of 345,759 patients were included in the study.

Intervention

Study patients were divided into two cohorts (homeless and nonhomeless) based on whether their patient record contained International Classification of Disease (ICD)-9 or ICD-10 codes for homelessness/inadequate housing.

Main Outcome Measures

One-year rates of reoperation for amputation, irrigation and debridement, repeat ORIF, repair of nonunion/malunion, and implant removal in isolation.

Results

Homeless patients had significantly higher odds of undergoing amputation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-2.27, P = 0.014), irrigation and debridement (aOR 1.22, 95% CI 1.08-1.37, P < 0.001), and repeat ORIF (aOR 1.16, 95% CI 1.00-1.35, P = 0.045). Implant removal was less common in homeless patients (aOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.59-0.72, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between homeless and nonhomeless patients in the rate of nonunion/malunion repair (aOR 0.87, 95% CI 0.63-1.18, P = 0.41).

Conclusions

Homelessness is a significant risk factor for worse surgical outcomes following ankle fracture surgery. The findings of this study warrant future research to identify gaps in surgical fracture care for patients with housing insecurity and underscore the importance of developing interventions to advance health equity for this vulnerable patient population.

Level of Evidence

Prognostic Level III.

A national analysis of burn injuries among homeless persons presenting to emergency departments

INTRODUCTION

Burn injuries among the homeless are increasing as record numbers of people are unsheltered and resort to unsafe heating practices. This study characterizes burns in homeless encounters presenting to US emergency departments (EDs).

METHODS

Burn encounters in the 2019 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) were queried. ICD-10 and CPT codes identified homelessness, injury regions, depths, total body surface area (TBSA %), and treatment plans. Demographics, comorbidities, and charges were analyzed. Discharge weights generated national estimates. Statistical analysis included univariate testing and multivariate modeling.

RESULTS

Of 316,344 weighted ED visits meeting criteria, 1919 (0.6%) were homeless. Homeless encounters were older (mean age 44.83 vs. 32.39 years), male-predominant (71% vs. 52%), and had more comorbidities, and were more often White or Black race (p < 0.001). They more commonly presented to EDs in the West and were covered by Medicaid (51% vs. 33%) (p < 0.001). 12% and 5% of homeless burn injuries were related to self-harm and assault, respectively (p < 0.001). Homeless encounters experienced more third-degree burns (13% vs. 4%; p < 0.001), though TBSA % deciles were not significantly different (34% vs. 33% had TBSA % of ten or lower; p = 0.516). Homeless encounters were more often admitted (49% vs. 7%; p < 0.001), and homelessness increased odds of admission (OR 4.779; p < 0.001). Odds of transfer were significantly lower (OR 0.405; p = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

Homeless burn ED encounters were more likely due to assault and self-inflicted injuries, and more severe. ED practitioners should be aware of these patients' unique presentation and triage to burn centers accordingly.

Injury Pattern Analysis to Optimize Burn Injury Prevention in the Unhoused Community

Unhoused patients are an overrepresented group in burn injury, and are a uniquely vulnerable population. Current research focuses on the consequences of homelessness on burn outcomes, with little known about the specific circumstances and behaviors leading to burn injury that may represent specific targets for injury prevention efforts. The burn registry at an urban regional burn center was queried for burn admissions in unhoused adults from 2019 to 2022. Registry data pulled included demographics, urine toxicology, mechanism of injury, and injury subjective history. Subjective injury history was reviewed to determine more specific injury circumstances and activities during which accidental burns occurred. Demographic and mechanistic trends in burn admissions were explored via descriptive statistics. Among 254 admissions for burns from the unhoused community, 58.1% of patients were positive for stimulants on admission. Among accidental injuries (69.7%), common circumstances included preparing food or beverages, cooking or using methamphetamine, smoking cannabis or tobacco, bonfires, and candles. A specific common circumstance was lighting a cigarette while handling accelerants (6.7%). Interventions for stimulant abuse, as well as outreach efforts to educate unhoused patients about situational awareness, safe handling of accelerants, safe smoking practices, and safe cooking practices, may be effective tools in reducing burn admissions in this vulnerable population.

The Impact of Homelessness, Substance Use, and Mental Illness on Surgical Inpatient Outcomes in Australia

This study investigated inpatient surgical outcomes for people experiencing homelessness (PEH) in Australia. Retrospective administrative health data of emergency surgical admissions from a single center over five years, 2015 to 2020, was included. Independent associations between factors and outcomes were analyzed with binary logistic and log-linear regression. Of 11 229 admissions, 2% were experiencing homelessness. People experiencing homelessness were on average younger (49 vs 56 years), more likely to be males than females (77% vs 61%), suffer mental illness (10% vs 2%), and substance use disorders (54% vs 10%). People experiencing homelessness were not more likely to suffer surgical complications. However, male sex, older age, mental illness, and substance use were risk factors for poor surgical outcomes. Homelessness predicted greater odds of discharge against medical advice (4.3 times) and longer length of stay (1.25 times). These results highlighted the need for health interventions simultaneously addressing physical, mental health, and substance use issues in the care of PEH.

Surgical Care of Patients Experiencing Homelessness: A Scoping Review Using a Phases of Care Conceptual Framework

Homelessness is a growing concern across the world, particularly as individuals experiencing homelessness age and face an increasing burden of chronic health conditions. Although substantial research has focused on the medical and psychiatric care of patients experiencing homelessness, literature about the surgical care of these patients is sparse. Our objective was to review the literature to identify areas of concern unique to patients experiencing homelessness with surgical disease. A scoping review was conducted using a comprehensive database for studies from 1990 to September 1, 2020. Studies that included patients who were unhoused and discussed surgical care were included. The inclusion criteria were designed to identify evidence that directly affected surgical care, systems management, and policy making. Findings were organized within a Phases of Surgical Care framework: preoperative care, intraoperative care, postoperative care, and global use. Our search strategy yielded 553 unique studies, of which 23 met inclusion criteria. Most studies were performed at public and/or safety-net hospitals or via administrative datasets, and surgical specialties that were represented included orthopedic, cardiac, plastic surgery trauma, and vascular surgery. Using the Surgical Phases of Care framework, we identified studies that described the impact of housing status in pre- and postoperative phases as well as global use. There was limited identification of barriers to surgical and anesthetic best practices in the intraoperative phase. More than half of studies (52.2%) lacked a clear definition of homelessness. Thus, there is a marked gap in the surgical literature regarding the impact of housing status on optimal surgical care, with the largest area for improvement in the intraoperative phase of surgical and anesthetic decision making. Consistent use of clear definitions of homelessness is lacking. To promote improved care, a standardized approach to recording housing status is needed, and studies must explore vulnerabilities in surgical care unique to this population.

The Impact of Plastic Surgery Volume on Inpatient Burn Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Acute burn care involves multiple types of physicians. Plastic surgery offers the full spectrum of acute burn care and reconstructive surgery. The authors hypothesize that access to plastic surgery will be associated with improved inpatient outcomes in the treatment of acute burns.

METHODS

Acute burn encounters with known percentage total body surface area were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample from 2012 to 2014 based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition, codes. Plastic surgery volume per facility was determined based on procedure codes for flaps, breast reconstruction, and complex hand reconstruction. Outcomes included odds of receiving a flap, patient safety indicators, and mortality. Regression models included the following variables: age, percentage total body surface area, gender, inhalation injury, comorbidities, hospital size, and urban/teaching status of hospital.

RESULTS

The weighted sample included 99,510 burn admissions with a mean percentage total body surface area of 15.5 percent. The weighted median plastic surgery volume by facility was 245 cases per year. Compared with the lowest quartile, the upper three quartiles of plastic surgery volume were associated with increased likelihood of undergoing flap procedures (p < 0.03). The top quartile of plastic surgery volume was also associated with decreased odds of patient safety indicator events (p < 0.001). Plastic surgery facility volume was not significantly associated with a difference in the likelihood of inpatient death.

CONCLUSIONS

Burn encounters treated at high-volume plastic surgery facilities were more likely to undergo flap operations. High-volume plastic surgery centers were also associated with a lower likelihood of inpatient complications. Therefore, where feasible, acute burn patients should be triaged to high-volume centers.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Socioeconomic and comorbid factors associated with frostbite injury in the United States

Frostbite largely impacts the extremities and often results in long term disability due to amputation. More regions are experiencing extremes in temperature which increases risk of frostbite injury. The aim of this study is to detail social and comorbid factors associated with frostbite injury compared to isolated hand or foot burns. We used the National Inpatient Sample from years 2016 to 2018 to identify admissions included in this study. Weighted incidence and multivariable analysis assessed characteristics and outcomes of frostbite and isolated hand or foot burn injury. In the United States, the estimated incidence of frostbite injury in those aged 15 and over was 0.95 per 100,000 persons and 4.44 per 100,000 persons with isolated hand and foot burns. Homelessness, mental health disorder, drug or alcohol abuse, and peripheral vascular disease were all associated with risk of frostbite injury when compared to burn injury. We found that other insurance was associated with amputation following burn injury, while Black race and homelessness were associated with amputation during a non-elective primary admission following frostbite injury. The differing risk factors associated with early amputation in frostbite and burn patients warrant a multicenter study including burn centers in North America.

Social determinants of poor outcomes following frostbite injury: a study of the National Inpatient Sample

Severe frostbite injury can result in significant disability from amputation of limbs and digits which may be mitigated through prompt medical care. The reported rates of amputation vary widely between centers. Our aim is to describe the incidence and factors associated with amputation secondary to frostbite injury in the United States using a national sample of hospitalizations. Admissions for frostbite injury were identified in the National Inpatient Sample (2016-18). Factors associated with amputation were assessed by multivariable logistic regression and clustered by hospital. The overall incidence of frostbite injury in the U.S. is 0.83/100,000 people. Of the social factors associated with frostbite injury, homelessness and Black race were independently associated with a higher likelihood of amputation at the primary admission. Diagnosis of cellulitis was a predictor of amputation. Homeless frostbite patients more frequently discharged AMA and were less likely to discharge with supportive medical care, despite having a higher rate of more severe injury. Disability from amputation following frostbite injury impacts at least 20% of frostbite injured patients and disproportionally impacts the homeless population. Further study is needed to ascertain the decision-making that leads to early amputation following frostbite injury, especially in the homeless and Black population. Outreach and education efforts should be initiated to promote salvage of functional limb length following frostbite injury.

Homeless Tent Fires: A Descriptive Analysis of Tent Fires in the Homeless Population

Tent fires are a growing issue in regions with large homeless populations given the rise in homelessness within the US and existing data that suggest worse outcomes in this population. The aim of this study is to describe the characteristics and outcomes of tent fire burn injuries in the homeless population. A retrospective review was conducted involving two verified regional burn centers with patients admitted for tent fire burns between January 2015 and December 2020. Variables recorded include demographics, injury characteristics, hospital course, and patient outcomes. Sixty-nine patients met the study inclusion criteria. The most common mechanisms of injury were by portable stove accident, assault, and tobacco or methamphetamine-related. Median percent total body surface area (%TBSA) burned was 6% (IQR 9%). Maximum depth of injury was partial thickness in 65% (n=45) and full thickness in 35% (n=24) of patients. Burns to the upper and lower extremities were present in 87% and 54% of patients, respectively. Median hospital Length-of-Stay (LOS) was 10 days (IQR=10.5) and median ICU LOS was 1 day (IQR=5). Inhalation injury was present in 14% (n=10) of patients. Surgical intervention was required in 43% (n=30) of patients, which included excision, debridement, skin grafting, and escharotomy. In-hospital mortality occurred in 4% (n=3) of patients. Tent fire burns are severe enough to require inpatient and ICU level of care. A high proportion of injuries involved the extremities and pose significant barriers to functional recovery in this vulnerable population. Strategies to prevent these injuries are paramount.

High Cost and Resource Utilization of Frostbite Readmissions in the United States

BACKGROUND

Frostbite is a high morbidity, high-cost injury that can lead to digit or limb necrosis requiring amputation. Our primary aim is to describe the rate of readmission following frostbite injury. Our secondary aims are to describe the overall burden of care, cost, and characteristics of repeat hospitalizations of frostbite-injured people.

METHODS

Hospitalizations following frostbite injury (index and readmissions) were identified in the 2016 and 2017 Nationwide Readmission Database. Multivariable logistic regression was clustered by hospital and additionally adjusted for severe frostbite injury, gender, year, payor group, severity, and comorbidity index. Population estimates were calculated and adjusted for by using survey weight, sampling clusters, and stratum.

RESULTS

In the two-year cohort, 1,065 index hospitalizations resulted in 1,907 total hospitalizations following frostbite injury. Most patients were male (80.3%), lived in metropolitan/urban areas (82.3%), and nearly half were insured with Medicaid (46.4%). Of the 842 readmissions, 53.7% were associated with complications typically associated with frostbite injury. Overall, 29% of frostbite injuries resulted in at least one amputation. The average total cost and total LOS of readmissions was $236,872 and 34.7 days. Drug or alcohol abuse, homelessness, Medicaid insurance, and discharge AMA were independent predictors of unplanned readmission. Factors associated with multiple readmissions include discharge AMA and Medicare Insurance, but not drug or alcohol abuse or homelessness. The population-based estimated unplanned readmission rate following frostbite injury was 35.4% (95% CI 32.2 - 38.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study examining readmissions following frostbite injury on a national level. Drug or alcohol abuse, homelessness, Medicaid insurance, and discharge AMA were independent predictors of unplanned readmission, while only AMA discharge and Medicare insurance were associated with multiple readmissions. Supportive resources (community and hospital-based) may reduce unplanned readmissions of frostbite injured patients with those additional risk factors.

The Homelessness Crisis and Burn Injuries: A Cohort Study

The United States is facing a growing homelessness crisis. We characterize the demographics and outcomes of homeless patients who sustain burn injury and compare them to a cohort of domiciled patients. A retrospective cohort study was performed at the Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Regional Burn Center for consecutive acute burn admissions in adults from June 1, 2015, to December 31, 2018. Patients were categorized as either domiciled or homeless at the time of their injury. Prevalence rates were estimated using data from the regional homeless count. From 881 admissions, 751 (85%) had stable housing and 130 (15%) were homeless. The rate of burn injury requiring hospitalization for homeless adults was estimated at 88 per 100,000 persons. Homeless patients had a significantly larger median burn size (7 vs 5%, P < .05) and a greater rate of flame burns (68 vs 42%, P < .001). For the homeless, rates of assault and self-inflicted injury were 4- (18 vs 4%, P < .001) and 2-fold higher (9 vs 4%, P < .001), respectively. Homeless patients had higher rates of mental illness (32 vs 12%, P < .001) and substance abuse (88 vs 22%, P < .001), and were less likely to follow-up as outpatients (54 vs 87%, P < .001). There was no difference in mortality. Homeless patients had a longer median length of stay (LOS; 11 vs 7 days, P < .001) without significant differences in LOS per percentage TBSA. Homeless individuals should be considered a high-risk population for burn injury. This distinction serves as a call to action for the development of burn prevention strategies.