1
|
Wei J, Lu Y, Niu M, Cai B, Shi H, Ji W. Novel insights into hotspots of insect vectors of GLRaV-3: Dynamics and global distribution. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2024; 925:171664. [PMID: 38508278 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3 (GLRaV-3) is the most prevalent and economically damaging virus in grapevines and is found on nearly all continents, except Antarctica. Ten mealybugs act as vector insects transmitting the GLRaV-3. Understanding the potential distribution range of vector insects under climate change is crucial for preventing and managing vector insects and controlling and delaying the spread of GLRaV-3. This study investigated the potential geographical range of insect vectors of GLRaV-3 worldwide using MaxEnt (maximum entropy) based on occurrence data under environmental variables. The potential distributions of these insects were projected for the 2030s, 2050s, 2070s, and 2090s under the three climate change scenarios. The results showed that the potential distribution range of most vector insects is concentrated in Southeastern North America, Europe, Asia, and Southeast Australia. Most vector insects contract their potential distribution ranges under climate-change conditions. The stacked model suggested that potential distribution hotspots of vector insects were present in Southeastern North America, Europe, Southeast Asia, and Southeast Australia. The potential distribution range of hotspots would shrink with climate change. These results provide important information for governmental decision-makers and farmers in developing control and management strategies against vector insects of GLRaV-3. They can also serve as references for studies on other insect vectors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiufeng Wei
- College of Plant Protection, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, China
| | - Yunyun Lu
- College of Plant Protection, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, China
| | - Minmin Niu
- College of Plant Protection, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, China
| | - Bo Cai
- Post-Entry Quarantine Station for Tropical Plant, Haikou Customs District, Haikou 570311, China
| | - Huafeng Shi
- Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of Yuncheng City, Yanhu 044000, China
| | - Wei Ji
- Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of Yuncheng City, Yanhu 044000, China; College of Horticulture, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bansal R, Haviland DR, Hunter WB. Selection and validation of reference genes for quantifying gene expression in the Gill's mealybug. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY 2023; 116:2166-2172. [PMID: 37830307 DOI: 10.1093/jee/toad179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 08/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
The Gill's mealybug, Ferrisia gilli Gullan, (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) has emerged as a major pest of pistachio in California. Because F. gilli is only relatively recently described, there are no validated reference genes to normalize the expression data from real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in this species. We selected and validated 8 commonly used reference genes (RPS8, TBP, UBQE2, RPL7, RPL5, RPL40, RPLP1, and HEL) for expression stability in F. gilli. These genes were evaluated in 5 different geographical populations of F. gilli collected from organic and conventionally grown pistachio orchards. Candidate reference genes were also evaluated in F. gilli fed with 4 plant hosts: pistachio, almond, grapes, and lima beans. The stability of candidate genes was analyzed using 4 software algorithms: geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, and RefFinder. Three genes RPS8, RPL40, and RPL7 encoding for ribosomal proteins were identified as the most stable across the treatments and thus were recommended for normalizing the qRT-PCR data. These findings will support resistance monitoring, molecular toxicology, and functional genomics research in F. gilli.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raman Bansal
- USDA-ARS, San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center, Parlier, CA 93648, USA
| | - David R Haviland
- University of California Cooperative Extension, Kern County, Bakersfield, CA 93307, USA
| | - Wayne B Hunter
- USDA-ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory, Fort Pierce, FL 34945, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bansal R, Hunter WB, Haviland DR. Baseline Susceptibility and Evidence of Resistance to Acetamiprid in Gill's Mealybug, Ferrisia gilli Gullan (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY 2023; 116:554-559. [PMID: 36708019 DOI: 10.1093/jee/toad012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Gill's mealybug, Ferrisia gilli (Gullan) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), is a major pest of pistachio in California. Insecticide treatment is the primary control method and acetamiprid is widely used to control this pest. However, there have been numerous reports of control failures for F. gilli after field applications of recommended insecticides in recent years. The purpose of this study was to develop a method for routine monitoring of F. gilli susceptibility and quantify current levels of F. gilli susceptibility to acetamiprid. A leaf-dip bioassay method using lima bean leaves was established and baseline susceptibility responses of 5 field populations were determined. Lethal concentrations to kill 50% of population (LC50) for second instar nymphs at 48 h ranged from 0.367 to 2.398 µg(AI)ml-1 of acetamiprid. Similarly, lethal concentrations to kill 90% of population (LC90) for second instar nymphs at 48 h ranged from 2.887 to 10.752 µg(AI)ml-1 of acetamiprid. The F. gilli population collected from Hanford area showed up to 6.5-fold significantly decreased mortality to acetamiprid compared to other populations. The resistance identified in this study, although relatively low, indicates that there has been repeated pressure to select for acetamiprid resistance and resistance levels can further magnify if effective management steps are not taken. The baseline susceptibility established in this study can be used to investigate potential cause of recent acetamiprid failures against F. gilli. In the long-term, results of this study will support the development of resistance management strategies by monitoring shifts in the susceptibility of F. gilli populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raman Bansal
- USDA-ARS, San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center, Parlier, CA 93648, USA
| | - Wayne B Hunter
- USDA-ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory, Fort Pierce, FL 34945, USA
| | - David R Haviland
- University of California Cooperative Extension, Kern County, Bakersfield, CA 93307, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Daane KM, Yokota GY, Walton VM, Hogg BN, Cooper ML, Bentley WJ, Millar JG. Development of a Mating Disruption Program for a Mealybug, Planococcus ficus, in Vineyards. INSECTS 2020; 11:insects11090635. [PMID: 32947862 PMCID: PMC7563353 DOI: 10.3390/insects11090635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Revised: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Simple Summary The vine mealybug is a key insect pest of vineyards that currently is controlled by one or more insecticide applications per season. Here, we sought to develop a more sustainable control tool by using the mealybug’s sex pheromone to reduce mating and thereby lower pest damage. The mature female mealybug emits a sex pheromone that the winged adult male uses to find and mate with females. Synthetically produced sex pheromone, specific to the vine mealybug, was enclosed in commercial dispensers and deployed in vineyards in 2004–2007 studies to determine if mating disruption could provide a viable control option. Trials were conducted in commercial vineyards with cooperating farmers. Across all trials, mating disruption reduced pheromone trap captures of adult male mealybugs—an indication that the population numbers were lowered—and there was often a reduction mealybug numbers on vines and/or crop damage. There was not a clear reduction in the proportion of female mealybugs with ovisacs (a cottony-like mass containing mealybug eggs), but this may have resulted from the production of non-viable ovisacs that were not differentiated in the field samples. Pheromone trap captures were never lowered to zero (often called trap shut down), possibly because trials were conducted in vineyards with unusually high mealybug densities. Trap capture patterns commonly began low in April-May, increased in mid-July or August, and often decreased in September–October when post-harvest insecticides were applied. Results over all years suggest season-long coverage or late season coverage may be as or more important than dose per hectare. This research was used to help initiate the commercialization of mating disruption products for the vine mealybug, which are now being successfully used throughout the world’s grape-growing regions where this pest is found. Abstract The vine mealybug (VMB), Planococcus ficus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), is a key insect pest of vineyards, and improvements in sustainable control of this pest are needed to meet increasing consumer demand for organically farmed products. One promising option is mating disruption. In a series of experiments conducted from 2004 to 2007, we tested the effects of mating disruption on trap captures of Pl. ficus males in pheromone-baited traps, on Pl. ficus numbers and age structure on vines, and on damage to grape clusters. From 2004 to 2005, the effects of dispenser load (mg active ingredient per dispenser) were also assessed, and dispensers were compared to a flowable formulation. Across all trials, mating disruption consistently reduced pheromone trap captures and often reduced mealybug numbers on vines and/or crop damage, regardless of the pheromone dose that was applied. Reductions in Pl. ficus densities in mating disruption plots were not accompanied by clear effects on mealybug population age structure; however, production of non-viable ovisacs by unmated females may have obscured differences in proportional representation of ovisacs. Pheromone trap captures were never lowered to zero (often called trap shut down), possibly because trials were conducted in vineyards with unusually high Pl. ficus densities. Trap-capture patterns in both treated and control plots commonly began low in April–May, increased in mid-July or August, and often decreased in September–October when post-harvest insecticides were applied. During the four-year trial, the release rate from plastic sachet dispensers was improved by industry cooperators as pheromone was released too quickly (2004) or not completely released during the season (2005–2006). The flowable formulation performed slightly better than dispensers at the same application dose. Results over all years suggest season-long coverage or late-season coverage may be as or more important than dose per hectare. Development of a dispenser with optimized season-long pheromone emission or targeted seasonal periods should be a future goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kent M. Daane
- Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3114, USA;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-559-646-6522
| | - Glenn Y. Yokota
- Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3114, USA;
| | - Vaughn M. Walton
- Department of Horticulture, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA;
| | - Brian N. Hogg
- USDA-ARS, Invasive Species and Pollinator Health Research Unit, Albany, CA 94710, USA;
| | - Monica L. Cooper
- University of California Cooperative Extension, 1710 Soscol Avenue, Napa, CA 94559, USA;
| | - Walter J. Bentley
- Kearney Agricultural Center, University of California IPM Program, Parlier, CA 93648, USA;
| | - Jocelyn G. Millar
- Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wu Q, Habili N, Constable F, Al Rwahnih M, Goszczynski DE, Wang Y, Pagay V. Virus Pathogens in Australian Vineyards with an Emphasis on Shiraz Disease. Viruses 2020; 12:v12080818. [PMID: 32731601 PMCID: PMC7472089 DOI: 10.3390/v12080818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Revised: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Grapevine viruses are found throughout the viticultural world and have detrimental effects on vine productivity and grape and wine quality. This report provides a comprehensive and up-to-date review on grapevine viruses in Australia with a focus on “Shiraz Disease” (SD) and its two major associated viruses, grapevine virus A (GVA) and grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3 (GLRaV-3). Sensitive grapevine cultivars like Shiraz infected with GVA alone or with a co-infection of a leafroll virus, primarily GLRaV-3, show symptoms of SD leading to significant yield and quality reductions in Australia and in South Africa. Symptom descriptors for SD will be outlined and a phylogenetic tree will be presented indicating the SD-associated isolates of GVA in both countries belong to the same clade. Virus transmission, which occurs through infected propagation material, grafting, and naturally vectored by mealybugs and scale insects, will be discussed. Laboratory and field-based indexing will also be discussed along with management strategies including rogueing and replanting certified stock that decrease the incidence and spread of SD. Finally, we present several cases of SD incidence in South Australian vineyards and their effects on vine productivity. We conclude by offering strategies for virus detection and management that can be adopted by viticulturists. Novel technologies such as high throughput sequencing and remote sensing for virus detection will be outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Wu
- School of Agriculture, Food & Wine, University of Adelaide, Waite Precinct, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, Adelaide 5064, South Australia, Australia; (Q.W.); (Y.W.)
- The Australian Wine Research Institute, PO Box 197, Glen Osmond, Adelaide 5064, South Australia, Australia;
| | - Nuredin Habili
- The Australian Wine Research Institute, PO Box 197, Glen Osmond, Adelaide 5064, South Australia, Australia;
| | - Fiona Constable
- Agriculture Victoria Research, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, AgriBio, Bundoora, Melbourne 3083, Victoria, Australia;
| | - Maher Al Rwahnih
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA;
| | - Darius E. Goszczynski
- Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Council, Private Bag X134, Pretoria 0001, South Africa;
| | - Yeniu Wang
- School of Agriculture, Food & Wine, University of Adelaide, Waite Precinct, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, Adelaide 5064, South Australia, Australia; (Q.W.); (Y.W.)
| | - Vinay Pagay
- School of Agriculture, Food & Wine, University of Adelaide, Waite Precinct, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, Adelaide 5064, South Australia, Australia; (Q.W.); (Y.W.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cooper ML, Daugherty MP, Jeske DR, Almeida RPP, Daane KM. Incidence of Grapevine Leafroll Disease: Effects of Grape Mealybug (Pseudococcus maritimus) Abundance and Pathogen Supply. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY 2018; 111:1542-1550. [PMID: 29726945 DOI: 10.1093/jee/toy124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Studies of spatiotemporal dynamics are central to efforts to characterize the epidemiology of infectious disease, such as mechanism of pathogen spread and pathogen or vector sources in the landscape, and are critical to the development of effective disease management programs. To that end, we conducted a multi-year study of 20 vineyard blocks in coastal northern California to relate the dynamics of a mealybug vector, Pseudococcus maritimus (Ehrhorn) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), to incidence of grapevine leafroll disease (GLD). In each vineyard block, a subset of vines were scored visually for relative mealybug abundance, disease was quantified by visual assessment, and virus presence was verified using standard laboratory molecular assays. GLD incidence was analyzed with a classification and regression tree, and with a hierarchical model that also captured variability among blocks and heterogeneity within blocks. Both analyses found strong interannual variability in incidence, with the hierarchical model also capturing substantial between- and within-block heterogeneity, but with significant contributions of vector abundance and pathogen supply (prior disease incidence) to the frequency of newly diseased vines. These results strengthen further the conclusion that mealybug vectors are causally related to pathogen spread in this system and are therefore an important target for management. Moreover, they are consistent with relatively efficient secondary spread of the pathogen, suggesting an important role for the removal of diseased vines as a tool to mitigate further damage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica L Cooper
- Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Cooperative Extension, Napa, CA
| | | | - Daniel R Jeske
- Department of Statistics, University of California, Riverside, CA
| | - Rodrigo P P Almeida
- Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA
| | - Kent M Daane
- Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA
| |
Collapse
|