Second-line chemotherapy for relapsed small cell lung cancer

Post-progression survival after atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide as first-line chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer has a significant impact on overall survival

BACKGROUND

The effect of first-line chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) may be significantly influenced by subsequent therapy for patients with extensive disease small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). Therefore, we evaluated the relationship between progression-free survival (PFS), post-progression survival (PPS), and OS of ED-SCLC patients treated with atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide as first-line therapy.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of 57 patients with relapsed ED-SCLC treated with atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide (AteCE) as first-line chemotherapy between August 2019 and September 2020. The respective correlations between PFS-OS and PPS-OS following first-line AteCE treatment were examined at the individual patient level.

RESULTS

Spearman's rank correlation analysis and linear regression analysis showed that PPS strongly correlated with OS (r = 0.93, p < 0.05, R²  = 0.85) and that PFS moderately correlated with OS (r = 0.55, p < 0.05, R²  = 0.28). Performance status at relapse (0-1/≥2), number of cycles of atezolizumab maintenance therapy (<3/≥3), and platinum rechallenge chemotherapy all significantly positively correlated with PPS (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Upon comparing OS-PFS and OS-PPS in this patient population, OS and PPS were found to have a stronger correlation. These results suggest that performance status at relapse, atezolizumab maintenance, or chemotherapy rechallenge could affect PPS.

Topotecan monotherapy for the treatment of relapsed small cell lung cancer in elderly patients: A retrospective analysis

Background

Topotecan is one of the most active chemotherapeutic drugs for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, its efficacy in elderly patients with SCLC has not been validated. This study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of topotecan monotherapy in elderly patients with relapsed SCLC.

Methods

Between January 2000 and March 2017, 43 patients aged ≥ 70 years received topotecan monotherapy for relapsed SCLC at four institutions. The clinical outcomes and adverse events of treatment were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Twenty‐nine patients (median age 75 years; range: 70–83 years) had sensitive‐type relapse, while 14 (median age 78 years; range: 71–82 years) had refractory relapse. The median number of treatment cycles was two (range: 1–6). The response rate was 7.0% (10.3% and 0% in sensitive and refractory patients, respectively), while the disease control rate was 23.2% (20.6% and 42.8% in sensitive and refractory patients, respectively). Median progression‐free survival was 1.9 months in sensitive patients and 1.4 months in refractory patients (P = 0.87). The median survival time from the start of topotecan therapy was 5.5 months in sensitive patients and 4.0 months in refractory patients (P = 0.64). Grade ≥ 3 hematological toxicities were as follows: leukopenia, 37.2%; neutropenia, 51.1%; anemia, 0%; thrombocytopenia, 32.5%; and febrile neutropenia, 9.3%. No treatment‐related deaths occurred.

Conclusion

Although hematological toxicities (particularly neutropenia) were severe, topotecan showed favorable disease control in both sensitive and refractory patients. Topotecan may thus be a preferred treatment for elderly patients with relapsed SCLC.

A retrospective study of amrubicin monotherapy for the treatment of relapsed small cell lung cancer in elderly patients

Purpose

Amrubicin is one of the most active chemotherapeutic drugs for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Previous studies reported its effectiveness and severe hematological toxicity. However, the efficacy of amrubicin monotherapy in elderly patients with SCLC has not been described. The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of amrubicin monotherapy in elderly patients and its efficacy for relapsed SCLC.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study design was used. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical effects and adverse events of amrubicin treatment in elderly (≥70 years) SCLC patients with relapsed SCLC.

Results

Between November 2003 and September 2015, 86 patients (aged ≥70 years) received amrubicin monotherapy for relapsed SCLC at four institutions. There were 42 cases of sensitive relapse (S) and 44 of refractory relapse (R). S cases with median age of 75 years (range 70–85 years) and R cases with median age of 74 years (range 70–84 years) were included in our analysis. The median number of treatment cycles was three (range 1–9), and the response rate was 33.7% (40.5% in the S and 27.2% in the R cases). Median progression-free survival time was 4.0 months in the S and 2.7 months in the R patients (p = 0.013). Median survival time from the start of amrubicin therapy was 7.6 months in the S and 5.5 months in the R cases (p = 0.26). The frequencies of grade ≥3 hematological toxicities were as follows: leukopenia, 60.4%; neutropenia, 74.4%; anemia, 11.6%; thrombocytopenia, 16.2%; and febrile neutropenia, 17.4%. Treatment-related death was observed in one patient.

Conclusion

Although hematological toxicities, particularly neutropenia, were severe, amrubicin showed favorable efficacy, not only in the S but also in the R cases, as shown in previous studies. Amrubicin could be a preferable standard treatment in elderly patients with relapsed SCLC. These results warrant further evaluation of amrubicin in elderly patients with relapsed SCLC by a prospective trial.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00280-017-3403-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Clinical impact of post-progression survival on overall survival in elderly patients with extensive disease small-cell lung cancer

Background

The effects of first‐line chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) might be confounded by subsequent therapies in patients with small‐cell lung cancer (SCLC). Therefore, the objective of our study was to determine the relationships between progression‐free survival (PFS) or post‐progression survival (PPS) and OS after first‐line chemotherapy in elderly patients with extensive disease‐SCLC (ED‐SCLC), using individual level data.

Methods

Between July 1998 and December 2014, we analyzed 57 cases of elderly patients with ED‐SCLC who were treated with carboplatin and etoposide as first‐line chemotherapy. The relationships between PFS and PPS with OS were analyzed at an individual level.

Results

Spearman rank correlation and linear regression analyses showed that PPS was strongly correlated with OS (r = 0.92, P < 0.05, R² = 0.83) and PFS was moderately correlated with OS (r = 0.76, P < 0.05, R² = 0.25). The best response at second‐line treatment and the number of regimens after progression beyond first‐line chemotherapy were both significantly associated with PPS (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

PPS has a stronger impact on OS than PFS in elderly ED‐SCLC patients after first‐line chemotherapy. In addition, the response at second‐line treatment and the number of additional regimens after first‐line treatment are significant independent prognostic factors for PPS. These results suggest that OS in elderly ED‐SCLC patients may be influenced by treatments subsequent to first‐line chemotherapy; however, this remains to be verified with prospective studies.

Clinical Significance of the Relationship between Progression-Free Survival or Postprogression Survival and Overall Survival in Patients with Extensive Disease-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Carboplatin plus Etoposide

Background. The effects of first-line chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) might be confounded by subsequent therapies in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Therefore, by using individual-level data, we aimed to determine the relationships between progression-free survival (PFS) or postprogression survival (PPS) and OS after first-line chemotherapies in patients with extensive disease-SCLC (ED-SCLC) treated with carboplatin plus etoposide. Methods. Between July 1998 and December 2014, we analyzed 63 cases of patients with ED-SCLC who were treated with carboplatin and etoposide as first-line chemotherapy. The relationships of PFS and PPS with OS were analyzed at the individual level. Results. Spearman rank correlation analysis and linear regression analysis showed that PPS was strongly correlated with OS (r = 0.90, p < 0.05, and R² = 0.71) and PFS was moderately correlated with OS (r = 0.72, p < 0.05, and R² = 0.62). Type of relapse (refractory/sensitive) and the number of regimens administered after disease progression after the first-line chemotherapy were both significantly associated with PPS (p < 0.05). Conclusions. PPS has a stronger relationship with OS than does PFS in ED-SCLC patients who have received first-line chemotherapy. These results suggest that treatments administered after first-line chemotherapy affect the OS of ED-SCLC patients treated with carboplatin plus etoposide.

Clinical impact of post-progression survival on overall survival in patients with limited-stage disease small cell lung cancer after first-line chemoradiotherapy

Background

The effects of first-line chemoradiotherapy on overall survival (OS) may be confounded by subsequent lines of therapy in patients with limited-stage disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC). Therefore, we aimed to determine the relationships between progression-free survival (PFS), post-progression survival (PPS) and OS after first-line chemoradiotherapy in LD-SCLC patients.

Patients and methods.

We retrospectively analyzed 71 LD-SCLC patients with performance status (PS) 0–2 who received first-line chemoradiotherapy and had disease recurrence between September 2002 and March 2013 at Shizuoka Cancer Center (Shizuoka, Japan). We determined the correlation between PFS and OS and between PPS and OS at the individual level. In addition, we performed univariate and multivariate analyses to identify significant prognostic factors of PPS.

Results

OS is more strongly correlated with PPS (Spearman’s r = 0.86, R² = 0.72, p < 0.05) than PFS (Spearman’s r = 0.46, R² = 0.38, p < 0.05). In addition, the response to second-line treatments, the presence of distant metastases at recurrence and the number of additional regimens after first-line chemoradiotherapy were significant independent prognostic factors for PPS.

Conclusions

PPS has more impact on OS than PFS in recurrent LD-SCLC patients with good PS at beginning of the treatment. Moreover, treatments administered after first-line chemoradiotherapy may affect their OS. However, larger multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings.

Comparison of platinum combination re-challenge therapy and docetaxel monotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients previously treated with platinum-based chemoradiotherapy

Platinum-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a standard front-line treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, no clinical trials have compared the efficacy and toxicity of platinum combination and docetaxel as subsequent re-challenge chemotherapies after cancer recurrence following CRT. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of platinum combination chemotherapy versus docetaxel monotherapy in NSCLC patients previously treated with platinum-based CRT.

From September 2002 to December 2009, at three participating institutions, 24 patients with locally advanced NSCLC, who had previously received platinum-based CRT, were treated with platinum combination re-challenge therapy, whereas 61 received docetaxel monotherapy. We reviewed their medical charts to evaluate patient characteristics and data regarding treatment response, survival, and toxicity.

The response rates were 16.7% and 6.6% in the platinum combination chemotherapy and docetaxel monotherapy groups, respectively (p = 0.09), whereas disease control rates were 58.3% and 57.4%, respectively (p = 0.82). Progression-free survival was similar between the two groups (median, 4.2 vs. 2.3 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.51–1.29; p = 0.38), as was overall survival (median, 16.5 vs. 13.0 months; HR = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.47–1.41; p = 0.47). The incidence and severity of toxicity was also similar between the two groups. Hematological toxicity, particularly leukopenia and neutropenia, was more frequent in the docetaxel group.

Our results indicated that platinum combination re-challenge was equivalent to docetaxel for relapsed patients previously treated with platinum-based CRT.

Phase II study of bendamustine in relapsed chemotherapy sensitive or resistant small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

To determine the time to progression (TTP), response rate (RR), and toxicity for North American patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) treated with bendamustine in the second- or third-line setting.

METHODS

Patients with relapsed, histologically confirmed SCLC were eligible for enrollment on study. The study population included patients with both chemotherapy-sensitive and chemotherapy-resistant disease treated with up to two prior lines of chemotherapy. Patients were treated with 120 mg/m of bendamustine on days 1 and 2 of a 21-day cycle for up to six cycles. Primary end point was TTP; secondary end points included toxicity, RR, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients were accrued, 50 patients met eligibility for enrollment. The median age of patients was 62, and 56% were men. Twenty-nine patients (58%) had chemotherapy-sensitive disease. Median TTP was 4.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.3-5.4), median overall survival was 4.8 months (95% CI, 3.8-6.3), and the RR was 26% (95% CI, 13.3%-39.5%). Patients with chemosensitive disease had a median TTP of 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.3-6.0) compared with 3.4 months (95% CI, 2.7-∞) for chemotherapy-resistant disease. The RR was 33% (95% CI, 14.2%-51.8%) in patients with chemosensitive disease and 17% (95% CI, 0%-34.4%) in those with chemoresistant disease. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were fatigue (20%), dyspnea (12%), and anemia (12%).

CONCLUSION

Bendamustine has modest activity in relapsed SCLC similar to other agents evaluated in this patient population.

Efficacy and safety of platinum combination chemotherapy re-challenge for relapsed patients with non-small-cell lung cancer after postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy of cisplatin plus vinorelbine

BACKGROUND

There is no standard therapy for relapsed patients who have received postoperative platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy for resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated the efficacy and safety of platinum combination chemotherapy re-challenge for such patients.

METHODS

Medical records from 3 institutes from April 2005 to July 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent complete surgical resection were eligible if they received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin plus vinorelbine once and then re-challenge with platinum combination chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were enrolled in this study. After re-challenge with platinum combination chemotherapy, we observed an overall response rate of 31.2% (5/16) and a disease control rate of 81.2% (13/16). Median progression-free survival and overall survival from the start of the re-administration of platinum combination chemotherapy were 6.5 and 28.0 months, respectively. Frequently observed severe adverse events (≥grade 3) included neutropenia (31.2%), thrombocytopenia (31.2%), leukopenia (12.5%) and hyponatremia (12.5%). Frequently observed non-hematological toxicities (≥grade 2) were anorexia (37.5%) and nausea (37.5%).

CONCLUSION

Re-challenge with platinum combination chemotherapy was effective and safe; therefore, this therapy should be considered as a treatment option for relapsed patients after postoperative cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy for resected NSCLC.

Small cell carcinoma of the head and neck: report of three cases

OBJECTIVE

Small cell carcinoma of the head and neck is rare and has unique histopathological characteristics that make it difficult to diagnose and treat. In this report, the Japanese Lung Cancer Treatment Guidelines were adapted to treat three patients with small cell carcinoma of the head and neck, and outcomes evaluated.

METHODS

There was one case each of stage I small cell carcinoma of the nasal cavity, stage IV-B small cell carcinoma of the ethmoid sinus, and stage IV-A small cell carcinoma of the submandibular gland. All patients underwent chemoradiotherapy and achieved a partial response.

RESULTS

Only case one underwent surgery after chemoradiotherapy; 31 months after treatment, this patient had suffered no recurrence. Case two died three months after treatment due to bone marrow metastasis. Case three had experienced no progression after 12 months of follow up.

CONCLUSION

In this small patient series, short-term results were equivalent to or better than usual treatment outcomes for small cell carcinoma of the lung.

Clinical features of unresectable high-grade lung neuroendocrine carcinoma diagnosed using biopsy specimens

BACKGROUND

The overall clinicopathological features or the optimal therapy for large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) have yet to be defined, because LCNEC has not been studied in the same depth as had small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) in both clinical and biological standpoints. The aim of this study was to elucidate the clinical features of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (HGNEC)-probable LCNEC diagnosed by biopsy, and compare therapeutic efficacy with patients with SCLC.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined the chart of total of 25 patients who underwent chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy as initial therapy for a histologic diagnosis of HGNEC-probable LCNEC, using biopsy samples and compared their data with those of 180 patients with SCLC. We analyzed their responses to chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

In 25 patients with HGNEC-probable LCNEC, 18 patients initially received chemotherapy (17 (94%) of whom received platinum-based chemotherapy) with an overall response rate (ORR) of 61%. The remaining 7 patients received chemoradiotherapy with an ORR of 86%, and 12 of the 25 patients who received second-line chemotherapy had an ORR of 17%. A total of 101 patients with SCLC who initially received chemotherapy had an ORR of 63%, and 79 patients who initially received chemoradiotherapy had an ORR of 98%, and 102 of the 180 patients who received second-line chemotherapy had an ORR of 45%. The 1-year overall survival rate for patients with stage IV HGNEC-probable LCNEC (n=13) and those with ED-SCLC (n=80) was 34% and 49%, respectively (p=0.84).

CONCLUSION

The overall response rate to initial treatment and the survival outcomes of HGNEC-probable LCNEC were comparable to those of SCLC, but the effectiveness of second-line chemotherapy appeared to differ between the 2 groups.

Effect of gefitinib re-challenge to initial gefitinib responder with non-small cell lung cancer followed by chemotherapy

PURPOSE

We investigated the efficacy of gefitinib re-challenge for the patients who responded to initial treatment with gefitinib and acquired resistance to gefitinib thereafter.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Medical records were retrospectively reviewed in the hospitals of National Hospital Organization from August 2002 to August 2008. Patients histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC were eligible if they once responded to initial treatment with gefitinib (CR, PR or SD) and then re-treated with gefitinib following subsequent chemotherapy.

RESULT

Twenty patients (16 PR, 4 SD) were enrolled in this study. After re-treatment with gefitinib, 5 cases showed PR and 8 cases SD. Overall response rate was 25% (5/20) and disease control rate was 65% (13/20) in the gefitinib re-treated patients. Median survival time from the start of the initial gefitinib and from the start of the re-administration of gefitinib were 34.0 and 10.0 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Re-administration of gefitinib was effective and therefore should be considered as one of the treatment option for the patients with NCLCL who once responded and acquired resistant to gefitinib following subsequent chemotherapy.

Phase II study of picoplatin as second-line therapy for patients with small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

This study was designed to confirm the efficacy and safety of picoplatin, a cisplatin analog designed to overcome platinum resistance, in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) with platinum-refractory/-resistant disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients received intravenous picoplatin 150 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. Tumor response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were evaluated. Adverse events were assessed for frequency, severity, and relationship to treatment. Quality of life was assessed with the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale instrument.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients were treated with picoplatin (median number of cycles, two; range one to 10). Three patients (4%) had a partial response, 33 (43%) had stable disease (four of these were unconfirmed partial responses), 36 (47%) had progressive disease, and five were not assessable for response. Median progression-free survival was 9.1 weeks (95% CI, 7.0 to 12.1 weeks). Median overall survival was 26.9 weeks (95% CI, 21.1 to 33.4). The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were thrombocytopenia (48%), neutropenia (25%), and anemia (20%). The most commonly reported adverse events of any severity included thrombocytopenia (64%), anemia (49%), neutropenia (39%), nausea (27%), fatigue (16%), and dyspnea (16%). No severe neurotoxicity or nephrotoxicity were observed. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

Picoplatin demonstrated clinical efficacy in platinum-refractory SCLC. The major toxicity was hematologic. These results warrant further evaluation in this patient population.

Phase II study of weekly plitidepsin as second-line therapy for small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the antitumor activity and safety profile of plitidepsin administered as a 1h weekly intravenous (i.v.) infusion of 3.2mg/m(2) to patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who relapsed or progressed after one line of chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, exploratory, phase II clinical trial. Treatment lasted until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient refusal or treatment delay for >2 weeks. Objective response rate (primary efficacy endpoint) was evaluated according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). The rate of stable disease (SD) lasting for at least 6 months and time-to-event variables were secondary endpoints of efficacy. Toxicity was assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) version 2.0.

RESULTS

Twenty pretreated SCLC patients (median age, 60 years) with extensive (n = 13) or limited-stage disease (n = 7) received a total of 24 treatment cycles (median, one cycle per patient; range, 1-2). Objective tumor responses were not observed and only one of the 17 evaluable patients had SD. With a median follow-up of 11.8 months, the progression-free survival and the median overall survival were 1.3 months and 4.8 months, respectively. The most troubling or common toxicities were fatigue, muscle weakness, lymphopenia, anemia (no patients showed neutropenia), and asymptomatic, non-cumulative increase of transaminases levels and alkaline phosphatase.

CONCLUSION

This clinical trial shows that a cycle of 1h weekly i.v. infusion of plitidepsin (3.2mg/m(2)) was generally well tolerated other than fatigue and muscle weakness in patients with pretreated SCLC. One patient died due to multi-organ failure. The absence of antitumor activity found here precludes further studies of this plitidepsin schedule as second-line single-agent treatment of SCLC.

Combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel and ifosfamide as the third-line regimen in patients with heavily pretreated small cell lung cancer

The efficacy of salvage regimens for small cell lung cancer remains to be established. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the paclitaxel and ifosfamide (PI) combination chemotherapy salvage regimen in heavily pretreated small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. Thirty-five patients who had received more than two prior chemotherapy regimens were treated with PI chemotherapy. Paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) was administered on day 1 and ifosfamide (2500 mg/m(2)) on day 1-2 every 3 weeks. Thirty-three patients were available for treatment response evaluation. Median age was 63 years (range, 40-78) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scores of 0/1/2 were 29.4%, 61.8%, and 11.8%, respectively. A median of 2 cycles (range, 1-6) of chemotherapy were administered. The overall response rate (RR) in the intent-to-treat population was 20.0% (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 6.7-33.3%) with 7 partial responses (PR) and no complete response (CR). Patients who responded to previous chemotherapy just before PI showed significantly higher RR than non-responders (RR, 57.1% versus 10.7%, P=.023). After a median follow-up of 8.8 months (range, 1.6-14.7), the median time to progression was 3.3 months (95% CI, 2.3-4.4) and the median overall survival was 7.6 months (95% CI, 6.7-8.5). The most common toxicity observed was mild nausea/vomiting and grade 3/4 adverse events were observed in 4 (11.4%) patients. There were no treatment-related deaths in the study. Our findings suggest that salvage PI chemotherapy is a feasible and well tolerated regimen for previously treated SCLC patients. Further studies are warranted to define the effects of PI chemotherapy on quality of life and survival benefits.

A multi-center phase II study of weekly topotecan as second-line therapy for small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the response rate, toxicity, failure free and overall survival of weekly topotecan in patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer who received one prior platinum based chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty two patients with relapsed disease after response to one prior chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy and patients with relapse more than 90 days after their last therapy received topotecan 4mg/m(2) intravenous over 30min on days 1,8,15; every 4 weeks (3 weeks on and 1 weeks off). Chemotherapy was given until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

Of 22 patients, none of the patients responded to weekly topotecan therapy. Four patients had stable disease. After a median follow up of 1 year, median time to progression was 6 weeks and median survival was 5 months. The common toxicities associated with this regimen were anemia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, GI side effects and alopecia.

CONCLUSION

Weekly topotecan was well tolerated but ineffective in this trial. Although commonly used, weekly regimen of topotecan should be used with caution in relapsed SCLC.

Small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer accounts for 13-15% of all lung cancer worldwide. There has been a decrease in the number of cases, with no clear explanation, except probably to changing in smoking habits in the last two decades. In the early eighties, it became clear that SCLC was an extremely sensitive tumor as to radiation as to chemotheraputic agents. With cisplatinum etoposide combinations or cyclophosphamide, anthracycline and vincristine/etyoposide regimens responses were observed in 50-70%, with 20-30% complete remissions in extensive disease. For limited stage patients chemotherapy associated with thoracic radiation was able to produce a cure rate of 10-20%. The addition of prophylactic brain irradiation to limited stage cases has reduced mortality by a factor of nearly 5%. But despite these early good results no breakthrough came later on, and in the last decade or so, we are still facing this plateau. New agents have recently been included in the therapeutic armamentarium, such as gemcitabine, irinotecan, paclitaxel. This fact has allowed many patients to receive a relatively active second line therapy, but the overall survival remains unchanged. Targeted therapies are undergoing some evaluations, but the data are too premature and so far quite discouraging. At the present time there is a urgent need to improve clinical research in this somehow forgotten disease.

Management of small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive type of lung cancer characterized by rapid growth and early metastasis. It is chemosensitive and radiosensitive, yet decades of research investigating multimodality treatments have failed to control or cure this disease in most patients. First-line treatment of limited-stage disease consists of chemotherapy (often etoposide/cisplatin or etoposide/carboplatin) combined with thoracic radiation therapy (TRT), followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation to decrease brain metastases as a site of disease progression for those who experience complete remission or a very good partial response to multimodality treatment. In a Japanese trial, the combination of irinotecan and cisplatin had initially shown promise in treating patients with extensive-stage SCLC, but a confirmatory trial in the United States did not find a difference in overall survival with irinotecan/cisplatin versus etoposide/cisplatin. Adding a third drug to the etoposide/cisplatin combination, as well as other triplet therapies, has mostly been ineffective in improving outcomes. Variables in chemotherapy administration, including maintenance therapy, alternating non-cross-resistance regimens, and dose intensification, have not been shown to increase survival at large. In terms of radiation therapy, early administration of TRT concurrent with chemotherapy, and hyperfractionation, have been beneficial in treatment of limited-stage disease. In patients who relapse, second-line therapy options consist of reinduction of previous chemotherapy or administration of a single agent. Targeted biological therapies for SCLC are now being investigated, and although a great deal of research remains to be done, these agents and their derivatives may provide the most hope for future treatment of SCLC.

Proteasome Inhibition in Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Preclinical Rationale and Clinical Applications

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a tobacco-related malignancy that usually presents in an extensive and therefore incurable stage. Although initially sensitive to platinum agent-based therapy, SCLC rapidly becomes refractory to chemotherapy, leading to disease recurrence and ultimately patient death. Treatment options following failure of first-line platinum agent-based therapy are limited. Small-cell lung cancer is characterized by molecular aberrancies such as overexpression of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2, which is regulated in part by the inhibitory IkappaB, a target of the ubiquitin-proteasome degradative pathway. Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that can decrease Bcl-2 expression through diminished IkappaB degradation. Efforts to promote apoptosis in SCLC through the integration of bortezomib into therapy are under way.

Progress in the therapy of small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 14% of all cases of lung cancer. Combination chemotherapy is the most effective treatment modality for SCLC and recently, several new active drugs have emerged. Combinations of platinum agents with CPT-11 or gemcitabine have been successfully compared in phase III trials against the cisplatin/etoposide standard. Modest improvements in the outcome of patients with SCLC have been noted over the last two decades. Thoracic irradiation given concurrently with chemotherapy improves survival compared with sequential chemotherapy and radiation, but this approach is associated with more toxicity. Moreover, the optimal doses and fractionation of thoracic irradiation remain to be determined. Three-dimensional treatment planning is under investigation. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has established a role in the management of patients who have achieved a complete response to the initial therapy. Novel molecular targeted therapies are among the strategies currently being investigated in SCLC.

Multi-institutional phase II trial of irinotecan, cisplatin, and etoposide for sensitive relapsed small-cell lung cancer

Irinotecan (CPT-11) has been shown to exhibit excellent antitumour activity against small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). A multi-institutional phase II study was therefore conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of CPT-11 combined with cisplatin (CDDP) and etoposide (ETOP) (PEI regimen) for the treatment of sensitive relapsed SCLC. Patients who responded to first-line chemotherapy but relapsed more than 8 weeks after the completion of first-line therapy (n=40) were treated using the PEI regimen, which consisted of CDDP (25 mg m⁻²) weekly for 9 weeks, ETOP (60 mg m⁻²) for 3 days on weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9, and CPT-11 (90 mg m⁻²) on weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8 with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. Five complete responses and 26 partial responses were observed, and the overall response rate was 78% (95% confidence interval 61.5–89.2%). The median survival time was 11.8 months, and the estimated 1-year survival rate was 49%. Grade 3/4 leucocytopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were observed in 55, 73, and 33% of the patients, respectively. Nonhaematological toxicities were mild and transient in all patients. In conclusion, the PEI regimen is considered to be highly active and well tolerated for the treatment of sensitive relapsed SCLC.

Phase II study of weekly irinotecan and carboplatin for refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer

We designed a phase II study of weekly irinotecan (CPT-11) and carboplatin for refractory or relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and assessed the response rate, survival, and toxicity. Twenty-nine patients with refractory or relapsed SCLC were entered onto the trial. The median time off chemotherapy was 3.5 months (range: 0.8-12.9). Patients were treated at 4-week intervals using CPT-11 (50 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15) plus carboplatin (AUC = 2 mg/ml min, intravenously on days 1, 8, 15). All patients were assessable for toxicity and survival; 28 patients were assessable for response. There were nine partial responses (PRs). Overall response rate was 31.0% (95% CI: 15.3-50.8%). The median time to progression was 3.5 months. Median survival time was 6.1 months. Major toxicity was myelosuppression. Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 52 and 21% of patients, respectively. Grade 3-4 diarrhea was observed in 7%. There was one treatment-related death due to febrile neutropenia and sepsis. This combination of CPT-11 and carboplatin seems to be active second-line regimen with acceptable toxicity against small cell lung cancer.

Chemotherapy as treatment of primary and recurrent small cell lung cancer

Chemotherapy is the treatment of choice in metastatic stage of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Radiation therapy, surgery and other forms of therapy are only included in special treatment situations, particularly for different local problems. A wide range of chemotherapeutic agents have proven to be effective in SCLC, including carboplatin, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, epirubicin, etoposide, ifosfamide, teniposide and vincristine. However, treatment results could not be improved over the last 10 years and the median survival of patients with metastatic disease is limited to 7-10 months. New agents like docetaxel, gemcitabine, irinotecan, paclitaxel, topotecan and vinorelbine have shown promising results in phase-II investigations. Yet, no evidence is provided from randomized trials to employ these drugs in first line treatment. Clearly, polychemotherapy is superior to single agent treatment. Compared to the combination of cisplatin and etoposide, no other combination has clearly shown improved results in large phase-III randomised trials, yet. The combination of cisplatin and irinotecan has also shown promising results in a single randomised trial with the need to be confirmed in larger settings. Neither extending the initial treatment beyond the median number of six cycles, nor maintenance treatment have-so far-resulted in any increase in survival results for patients with metastasised SCLC. Nor has dose-intensification, which causes significantly higher toxicities in patients, shown a clear impact on the overall survival of these patients. Brain metastases represent a high frequent complication associated with SCLC. In these cases, the combination of chemotherapy and whole brain radiation therapy is advocated. Second-line treatment should always be considered in patients with relapse or failure to first-line therapy. In addition to a rechallenging with the prior drug combination or selecting a different potentially non-cross resistant one, monotherapy with topotecan proved to be effective as well. In summary, up to now, no standard chemotherapy combination exists for metastatic SCLC. The individual therapy strategy can only be selected by considering the clinically relevant conditions of the patient.

Treatment and outcomes for elderly patients with small cell lung cancer

It is estimated that approximately half of the 500 000 people diagnosed with lung cancer worldwide every year are aged >70 years. Thus, this disease represents a major problem in the elderly and one that will indeed increase as the median age of the population increases. For small cell lung cancer (SCLC), which accounts for approximately 20% of cases of lung cancer, the primary treatment is chemotherapy and in the majority of cases the primary aim is to control the disease which generally would have spread beyond the lungs at the time of presentation. A small number of 'standard' chemotherapy regimens (combined with radiotherapy for patients with limited disease) have been shown to improve survival and quality of life and are widely used. Much of the work investigating the relationship between age and treatment outcomes has been based on clinical trial data and may itself be inherently biased due to trial eligibility criteria excluding elderly patients. However, there is no good evidence that elderly patients fare worse with treatment than their younger counterparts in terms of response rates and survival. Nevertheless with increasing age comes increasing concomitant illnesses which may account for the widely observed increases in drug toxicity, and this may be the primary consideration in selecting the treatment option. Thus for many elderly patients, carboplatin/ etoposide may be the treatment of choice because it is perhaps the least toxic of the standard regimens. Whatever regimen is chosen, the key to treatment effectiveness seems to be to deliver the first 3 or 4 cycles without delay or dosage reduction. Although palliation of symptoms remains a major goal in the treatment of all patients with SCLC there is a dearth of data on whether elderly patients are equally well palliated as their younger counterparts. There is no good evidence that age per se should be a factor in deciding whether patients should receive standard treatment rather than a more gentle approach, and more elderly patients should be included in clinical trials. The key areas where more information is required regarding the treatment and outcomes of elderly patients with SCLC are the assessment of palliation, and comprehensive reviews of all patients diagnosed with the disease, not just those included in trials.