Revised points and disputed matters in the eighth edition of the TNM staging system for gastric cancer

The number of mesogastria containing metastatic lymph nodes predicts gastric cancer prognosis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have established the existence of the mesogastrium, dividing it into 6 sections. The mesogastrium is identified during surgery and used in surgical practice. The aim of the present study was to further investigate its role in gastric cancer prognosis.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and January 2018, patients from the Tongji Hospital were included in this post hoc analysis, including data from a randomized clinical study (DCGC01; http://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov, NCT01978444). Mesogastria containing metastatic lymph nodes were referred to as metastatic mesogastria. Pathology reports were examined to assess metastases in the mesogastrium. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox models.

RESULTS

Among the 479 patients, 230 (48.0%) had no lymph node metastasis, 34 (7.1%) had 1 metastatic mesogastrium, and 215 (44.9%) had 2 to 6 metastatic mesogastria. Multivariate analysis showed that the number of metastatic mesogastria and N stages were independent risk factors for patient prognosis. In general, a higher metastatic mesogastrium number is positively correlated with a worse prognosis. For identical N stages, 5-year survival rates for patients with 2 to 6 metastatic mesogastria were significantly lower than those for patients with 1 metastatic mesogastrium.

CONCLUSION

The number of metastatic mesogastria serves as an independent prognostic factor from the N stage.

Feasibility of extracting cancer stage and metastasis codes from health insurance claims of outpatients and expressibility in ICD-11: a cross-sectional study using national health insurance data from South Korea

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of health insurance claims recording the cancer stage and TNM codes representing tumor extension size (T), lymph node metastasis (N), and distant metastasis (M) for patients diagnosed with cancer and to determine whether this extracted data could be applied to the new ICD-11 codes.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study design was used, with the units of analysis as individual outpatients. Two dependent variables were extraction feasibility of cancer stage and TNM metastasis information from each claim. Expressibility of the two variables in ICD-11 was descriptively analysed.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

The study was conducted in South Korea and study participants were outpatients: lung cancer (LC) (46616), stomach cancer (SC) (50103) and colorectal cancer (CC) (54707). The data set consisted of the first health insurance claim of each patient visiting a hospital from 1 July to 31 December 2021.

RESULTS

The absolute extraction success rates for cancer stage based on claims with cancer stage was 33.3%. The rates for stage for LC, SC and CC were 30.1%, 35.5% and 34.0%, respectively. The rate for TNM was 11.0%. The relative extraction success rates for stage compared with that for CC (the reference group) were lower for patients with LC (adjusted OR (aOR), 0.803; 95% CI 0.782 to 0.825; p<0.0001) but higher for SC (aOR 1.073; 95% CI 1.046 to 1.101; p<0.0001). The rates of TNM compared that for CC were 40.7% lower for LC (aOR, 0.593; 95% CI 0.569 to 0.617; p<0.0001) and 43.0% lower for SC (aOR 0.570; 95% CI 0.548 to 0.593; p<0.0001). There were limits to expressibility in ICD-11 regarding the detailed cancer stage and TNM metastasis codes.

CONCLUSION

Extracting cancer stage and TNM codes from health insurance claims were feasible, but expressibility in ICD-11 codes was limited. WHO may need to create specific cancer stage and TNM extension codes for ICD-11 due to the absence of current rules in ICD-11.

Effect of the number of negative lymph nodes removed on the survival and recurrence rate after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Various factors affect the survival rate of Gastric cancer (GC) patients after gastrectomy. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the number of negative lymph nodes (NLNs) removed on GC patients' survival and recurrence rate after gastrectomy.

METHODS

In this retrospective, multicenter cohort study, we reviewed the medical profile of 639 patients with a definite diagnosis of GC who underwent gastrectomy from 2010 to 2022 in one of the medical centers affiliated with the Iran University of Medical Sciences. Based on the number of NLNs removed, patients were divided into three groups, including (0-9NLNs), (10-15 NLNs), and (≥ 16 NLNs), including 155, 231, and 253 GC patients, respectively. Demographic characteristics, tumor characteristics, and pathological findings of the patients were extracted by referring to the patient's files.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rate of patients was estimated at 48.2%. The 5-year tumor recurrence rate in patients with the number of NLNs 1-9, NLNs 10-15, and ≥ 16 NLNs were 79.4%, 51.1%, and 30.8%, respectively. (Log-rank = 9.24, P 0.001) The multivariate analysis showed that the 5-year survival rate in patients with fewer NLNs removed ≥ 16 was significantly higher than in the other two groups. In addition, age, BMI, tumor size, tumor stage, metastasis, and tumor differentiation were significantly related to the survival of GC patients after gastrectomy. (p < 0.05) CONCLUSION: Paying attention to the number of NLNs removed during gastrectomy can be a key factor in improving the survival prediction of GC patients.

Carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 199 and carbohydrate antigen 724 in gastric cancer and their relationship with clinical prognosis

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) is a common malignant tumor of the digestive system with a high degree of malignancy. It usually develops insidiously without any specific symptoms in the early stages. As one of the diseases caused by abnormal gene changes, GC has abnormal expression of various oncogenes and products during its development. Tumor markers such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199) and carbohydrate antigen 724 (CA724) are not expressed or lowly expressed in normal people, but significantly increased after carcinogenesis. Monitoring the changes in the levels of tumor markers such as CEA, CA199 and CA724 is conducive to early diagnosis and evaluation of the occurrence of some solid tumors.

AIM

To investigate the expression of CEA, CA199 and CA724 in GC and their correlation with clinical features, hoping to provide more effective markers for the early preventive diagnosis of GC.

METHODS

Of 87 patients with GC admitted to our hospital from September 2020 to December 2021 were included in the GC group, and another 80 healthy people who came to our hospital for physical examination with normal results during the same period were selected as the control group. The serum CEA, CA199, and CA724 levels were compared between the two groups, and the serum CEA, CA199, and CA724 levels were compared in patients with GC at different TNM stages, and the differences in the positive rates of CEA, CA199, and CA724 alone and in combination in detecting TNM stages of GC and GC were compared. In addition, the relationship between the levels of tumor markers CEA, CA199 and CA724 and the clinicopathological characteristics of GC patients was also analyzed. The relationship between the serum levels of CEA, CA199 and CA724 and the survival period of GC patients was analyzed by Pearson.

RESULTS

The serum levels of CEA, CA199 and CA724 in GC group were significantly higher than those in control group (P < 0.05). With the increase of TNM stage, the serum CEA, CA199 and CA724 expression levels in GC patients increased significantly, and the differences between groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The positive rate of the CA724 single test was higher than that of CEA and CA199 single test (P < 0.05). The positive rate of the three combined tests was 95.40% (83/87), which was higher than that of CEA, CA199 and CA724 single tests. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The combined detection positive rates of CEA, CA199, and CA724 in stages I, II, III, and IV of GC were 89.66%, 93.10%, 98.85%, and 100.00% respectively, all of which were higher than the individual detection rates of CEA, CA199, and CA724. The differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in serum CEA, CA199 and CA724 levels between GC patients with different genders, smoking history and alcohol history (P > 0.05). However, the serum CEA, CA199 and CA724 levels were significantly higher in GC patients aged ≥ 45 years, TNM stage III-IV, with lymph node metastasis and tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm than in GC patients aged < 45 years, TNM stage I-II, without lymph node metastasis and tumor diameter < 5 cm (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The expression levels of serum tumor markers CEA, CA199 and CA724 in patients with GC are high and rise with the increase of TNM stage. The levels of CEA, CA199 and CA724 are related to age, TNM stage, lymph node metastasis and tumor diameter. The combined detection of CEA, CA199 and CA724 is helpful to improve the diagnostic accuracy of GC with high clinical guidance value.

Prognostic and predictive values of the grading system of lymph node status in patients with advanced-stage gastric cancer

Background

Lymph node metastasis is one of the most important prognostic factors of gastric cancer. However, the effect of germinal centers in lymph nodes on the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer has not been reported. This study aimed to investigate the contribution of germinal center generation to prognostic parameters and clinicopathological significance in gastric cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed gastric cancer patients who underwent surgery from October 2012 to June 2022. We analyzed 5484 lymph nodes (210 patients) and calculated the lymph node metastasis rate (LNMR) and the proportion of non-metastatic lymph nodes containing three or more germinal centers (NML-GCP).

Results

Using a grading system that incorporated LNMR and NML-GCP. The tumors were classified into three groups based on this system, which was found to be significantly associated with prognosis. The TNM stage and grading system of lymph node status were independent risk factors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The 5-year OS rates for patients with advanced gastric cancer were 85.07% (n=50), 58.34% (n=42), and 24.44% (n=21) for Grades 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p<0.0001). The 5-year DFS rates were 65.32% (n=58), 40.85% (n=51), and 5.88% (n=34), respectively (p<0.0001). Patients with Grade 1 advanced gastric cancer had higher 5-year OS and DFS rates compared to those with Grade 2 or 3 in TNM stage II and III. Furthermore, the 5-year OS and DFS rates differed significantly among patients with different grades of advanced gastric cancer who received chemotherapy (p<0.0001).

Conclusion

These findings suggest that the grading system may be valuable for predicting prognosis and guiding clinical management in patients with gastric cancer, and provides good prognostic stratification for OS and DFS in patients with TNM stage II and III.

Аre Multivisceral Resections for Gastric Cancer Acceptable: Experience from a High Volume Center and Extended Literature Review?

Introduction  Multivisceral resections (MVRs) in gastric cancer are potentially curable in selected patients in whom clear resection margins are possible. However, there are still uncertain data on their feasibility and safety considering short- and long-term results. The study compares survival, morbidity, mortality, and other secondary outcomes between standard and MVRs for gastric cancer. Materials and Methods  A monocentric retrospective study in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma, covering 2004 to 2020. Of the 336 operable cases, 101 patients underwent MVRs. The remaining 235 underwent standard gastric resections (SGRs), of which 173 patients were in stage T3/T4. To compare survival, a control group of 101 patients with palliative procedures was used-bypass anastomosis or exploration. Results  MVR had a lower survival rate than the SGR but significantly higher than the palliative procedures. The predominant gender in MVR was male (72.3%), with a mean age of 61 years. The perioperative mortality was 3.96% ( n  = 4), and the overall median survival was 28.1 months. The most frequently resected organs were the spleen (67.3%), followed by the pancreas (32.7%) and the liver (20.8%). In 56.4% of the cases two organs were resected, in 28.7% three organs, and in 13.9% four organs. The main complication was bleeding (9.9%). The major postoperative complications in the MVR were 14.85%, and in the SGR 6.4% ( p  < 0.05). Better long-term results were observed in patients who underwent R0 resections compared with R1. Conclusion  Multiorgan resections are characterized by poorer survival and a higher complication rate than gastrectomies. On the other hand, they have better long-term outcomes than palliative procedures. However, MVRs are admissible when performed by an experienced surgical team in high-volume centers.

Effects of perioperative blood transfusion in gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The short-term and long-term effects of perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) on patients with gastric cancer are still intriguing. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of blood transfusion on clinical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and The Cochrane Library on December 31th 2021. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DFS), and postoperative complications. A fixed or random-effects model was used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Fifty-one studies with a total of 41,864 patients were included for this review and meta-analysis. Compared with patients who did not receive blood transfusions (NPBT), PBT was associated with worse 5-year OS (HR = 2.39 [95%CI: 2.00, 2.84]; p < 0.001; Multivariate HR = 1.43 [95%CI: 1.24, 1.63]; p < 0. 001), worse 5-year DFS (HR = 2.26 [95%CI: 1.68, 3.05]; p < 0.001; Multivariate HR = 1.45 [95%CI: 1.16, 1.82]; p < 0. 001), and worse 5-year DSS (HR = 2. 23 [95%CI: 1.35, 3.70]; p < 0.001; Multivariate HR = 1.24 [95%CI: 0.96, 1.60]; p < 0.001). Moreover, The PBT group showed a higher incidence of postoperative complications [OR = 2.30 (95%CI:1.78, 2. 97); p < 0.001] than that in the NPBT group, especially grade III-V complications, according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. [OR = 2.50 (95%CI:1.71, 3.63); p < 0.001].

Conclusion

In patients who underwent gastrectomy, PBT was associated with negative survival effects (OS, DFS, DSS) and a higher incidence of perioperative complications. However, more research was expected to further explore the impact of PBT. Meanwhile, strict blood transfusion management should be implemented to minimize the use of PBT.

Gastric cancer in 2022: Is there still a role for endoscopic ultrasound?

Gastric cancer (GC) represents the fourth leading cause of cancer death worldwide and many factors can influence its development (diet, geographic area, genetic, Helicobacter pylori or Epstein-Barr virus infections). High quality endoscopy represents the modality of choice for GC diagnosis. The correct morphologic classification during a high-resolution endoscopy is fundamental for oncologic diagnosis, staging and therapeutic decisions. Since its initial introduction in clinical practice the endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has been considered a valuable tool for tumor (T-) and lymph nodes (N-) staging also in GC, in order to establish the best therapeutic strategy for the patient (e.g., upfront surgery vs neoadjuvant treatments). EUS tools as elastography, Doppler and contrast administration can improve diagnosis mainly in case of malignant lymph node evaluation. EUS has a marginal role in disease staging but has a fundamental role in case of a pre-endoscopic resection management and in the new era of endoscopic mucosal resection or submucosal dissection as minimally invasive surgery. Diagnosis and locoregional staging of GC with EUS are a method of inarguable value for the assessment of gastric wall involvement and presence of infiltrated paragastric lymph nodes. EUS can also have a role in disease restaging in those patients who have undergone neoadjuvant treatment. EUS can also have a role in the advanced phases of the disease, in facilitating palliative, minimally-invasive treatments, such as gastroenterostomy or biliary drainages. This review intends to discuss the modern role of EUS in GC topic.

Gastric adenocarcinoma: A review of the TNM classification system and ways of spreading

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer in the world. The most common histologic subtype is adenocarcinoma. Gastric adenocarcinomas are staged using the American Joint Committee on Cancer's 8th TNM classification. The perigastric ligaments, mesentery, omentum, and potential spaces between the parietal and visceral peritoneal linings play are important structures for staging. The spread of disease is influenced by the location of the tumor within the stomach, as well as by the anatomy related to the ligaments and lymph vessels. CT is the imaging modality of choice for the preoperative clinical staging of gastric cancer, and it is essential for planning treatment. To be able to do an adequate imaging workup, radiologists need to know the different pathways through which gastric cancer can spread: lymphatic, subperitoneal, direct invasion, transperitoneal, hematogenous, and extramural venous invasion.

Can the systemic inflammation score be used to predict prognosis in gastric cancer patients undergoing surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Inflammatory markers are being increasingly used to predict the prognosis of cancer patients. We hereby conducted the first meta-analysis assessing the association between systemic inflammation score (SIS) and prognosis of gastric cancer patients undergoing surgical intervention.

Methods

A literature search was carried out on PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Embase up to 3rd June 2022 for relevant studies. Adjusted data reported as hazard ratios (HR) was combined in a random-effects model.

Results

A total of seven studies with 5,338 patients could be included. All studies were from either China or Japan and published in the last four years. Meta-analysis showed that higher SIS scores (1 or 2) were significant predictors of poor overall survival (OS) in gastric cancer patients (HR: 1.25 95% CI: 1.05, 1.49, I²= 11%). Similarly, the meta-analysis demonstrated that an SIS score of 2 was associated with poor OS as compared to scores of 0/1 (HR: 2.53 95% CI: 1.30, 4.89, I²= 45%). Data on disease-free survival (DFS) was scarce to draw conclusions.

Conclusion

The SIS score can be a simple and useful tool to predict OS in gastric cancer patients undergoing surgery. Data on DFS is scarce and conflicting. Future studies should report using standard reference groups and provide data on DFS to enhance current evidence.

Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#searchadvanced, identifier: CRD42022335548.

Construction of a survival nomogram for gastric cancer based on the cancer genome atlas of m6A-related genes

Objective: Based on TCGA database, a prediction model for 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of gastric cancer (GC) patients was constructed by analyzing the critical risk factors affecting the prognosis of gastric cancer patients.

Method: Clinicopathological features as well as gene signature of GC patients were obtained from TCGA database. Patients were randomly divided into a training cohort and an internal validation cohort. Independent predictors of GC prognosis were analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox analyses to construct nomogram. The accuracy and reliability of the model was further validated by calibration curves, ROC curves, and C-indexes, and the clinical utility of the model was analyzed by decision analysis curves.

Result: Age, sex, N stage, M stage, METTL16, RBM15, FMR1, IGFBP1, and FTO were significantly associated with the prognosis of GC patients, and these predictors were further included in the construction of nomogram. The C-indexes for the training cohort and validation set were 0.735 and 0.688, respectively. The results of the ROC curve analysis indicated that the area under the curve (AUC) exceeded 0.6 in training and validation sets at 1, 3, and 5 years.

Conclusion: We have constructed and validated a nomogram that provides individual survival condition prediction for GC patients. The prognostic model integrating gene signatures and clinicopathological characteristics would help clinicians determine the prognosis of patients with GC and develop individualized treatment plans.