A Randomized Phase II Clinical Trial of Tailored CPT-11 + S-1 vs S-1 in Patients with Advanced or Recurrent Gastric Carcinoma as the First Line Chemotherapy

Randomized phase II trial of first-line treatment with tailored irinotecan and S-1 therapy versus S-1 monotherapy for advanced or recurrent gastric carcinoma (JFMC31-0301)

The pharmacokinetics of irinotecan vary markedly between individuals. This study sought to compare tailored irinotecan and S-1 therapy with S-1 monotherapy for the treatment of patients with advanced/recurrent gastric cancer. Patients with advanced/recurrent gastric cancer were randomized to receive tailored irinotecan and S-1 (arm A) therapy or S-1 therapy alone (arm B). Arm A received S-1 (80-120 mg/m(2)/day) for 14 days, with irinotecan on days 1 and 15. The initial irinotecan dose of 75 mg/m(2) (level 0) was adjusted for toxicity during an earlier course. In arm B, S-1 (80-120 mg/day) was administered alone for 28 days, followed by 14 days without therapy. Ninety-five patients were randomized (48 patients to arm A and 47 patients to arm B). The response rate of the primary tumor (Japanese criteria) was 25.0% in arm A (12 of 48 patients) and 14.9% in arm B (seven of 47 patients), whereas the response rates according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors were 27.8% (10 of 36) versus 21.9% (seven of 32). Hematological toxicity, anorexia, and diarrhea were significantly more common in arm A, but both arms had similar grades 3-4 toxicities. These findings suggest the usefulness of tailored irinotecan and S-1 therapy for gastric cancer.

Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer currently ranks second in global cancer mortality. Most patients are either diagnosed at an advanced stage, or develop a relapse after surgery with curative intent. Apart from supportive care and palliative radiation to localized (e.g. bone) metastasis, systemic chemotherapy is the only treatment option available in this situation.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of chemotherapy versus best supportive care, combination versus single agent chemotherapy and different combination chemotherapy regimens in advanced gastric cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE up to March 2009, reference lists of studies, and contacted pharmaceutical companies and national and international experts.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials on systemic intravenous chemotherapy versus best supportive care, combination versus single agent chemotherapy and different combination chemotherapies in advanced gastric cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data. A third investigator was consulted in case of disagreements. We contacted study authors to obtain missing information.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty five trials, with a total of 5726 patients, have been included in the meta-analysis of overall survival. The comparison of chemotherapy versus best supportive care consistently demonstrated a significant benefit in overall survival in favour of the group receiving chemotherapy (hazard ratios (HR) 0.37; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.24 to 0.55, 184 participants). The comparison of combination versus single-agent chemotherapy provides evidence for a survival benefit in favour of combination chemotherapy (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.74 to 0.90, 1914 participants). The price of this benefit is increased toxicity as a result of combination chemotherapy. When comparing 5-FU/cisplatin-containing combination therapy regimens with versus without anthracyclines (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.62 to 0.95, 501 participants) and 5-FU/anthracycline-containing combinations with versus without cisplatin (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.73 to 0.92, 1147 participants) there was a significant survival benefit for regimens including 5-FU, anthracyclines and cisplatin. Both the comparison of irinotecan versus non-irinotecan (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.73 to 1.02, 639 participants) and docetaxel versus non-docetaxel containing regimens (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.15, 805 participants) show non-significant overall survival benefits in favour of the irinotecan and docetaxel-containing regimens.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy significantly improves survival in comparison to best supportive care. In addition, combination chemotherapy improves survival compared to single-agent 5-FU. All patients should be tested for their HER-2 status and trastuzumab should be added to a standard fluoropyrimidine/cisplatin regimen in patients with HER-2 positive tumours. Two and three-drug regimens including 5-FU, cisplatin, with or without an anthracycline, as well as irinotecan or docetaxel-containing regimens are reasonable treatment options for HER-2 negative patients.

A general review of the role of irinotecan (CPT11) in the treatment of gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of gastric tumor is generally poor because most tumors are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Chemotherapy has a proven palliative role in advanced gastric cancer and several combination regimens were explored in the last 10 yr. Nevertheless, none of them showed a convincing improvement resulting in an enhancement of response rate and overall survival without discrimination of the quality of life. Irinotecan (CPT11) has been evaluated in multiple trials alone or in combined therapy with promising results and good tolerance. Thus, a review of the importance and impact of CPT11 in this indication is detailed.

METHODS

This article reviews the evidence for the use of CPT11 in the treatment of gastric cancer based on a computerized MEDLINE search of literature published until August 2006 leading to a total of 91 publications.

RESULTS

CPT11 was frequently used and showed a good response rate varying from 14% to 23% as single agent and 45% to 70% in combination with a median time to progression of 3 mo in single agent and 4-6 mo in combination, and median overall survival of approx 7 mo in single agent and up to 10.58 mo in combination.

CONCLUSION

The overall response of irinotecan-based chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer was shown to be as effective as other combined chemotherapy. The hematological and digestive toxicity were tolerable and mild, especially in weekly regimen. Thus, irinotecan-based chemotherapy should be considered as one of the preferred choices in front line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer.

Multi‐Institutional Phase II Study of S‐1 Monotherapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer with Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacogenomic Evaluations

This study describes the first phase II study of S-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine, in a non-Japanese Asian population with advanced gastric cancer. S-1 was administered twice daily for 28 days every 6 weeks. A pharmacokinetic study was performed on day 28 of cycles 1 and 3. Genomic DNA from peripheral mononuclear cells was analyzed using a cDNA microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) method. Thirty-one patients were initially given a dose of 35 mg/m(2) twice daily (bid) (group 1); then, the protocol was amended by increasing the dose to 40 mg/m(2) bid for an additional 31 patients (group 2) because of good tolerability to S-1. The overall response rate was 19.3% (95% confidence interval, 9.2%-29.5%). Over a median follow-up duration of 265 days, the median time to progression and overall survival time were 126 and 264 days, respectively. The 1-year survival rate was 34%. There was no grade 4 toxicity and the major adverse event was anemia. Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar to those of the previous Japanese reports. Microarray CGH identified 18 genes with copy number changes that were associated with hemoglobin reduction with S-1 treatment. A logistic regression analysis, integrating one clinical parameter (initial hemoglobin level) combined with three genetic copy number variations (HIST1H2BL, C10orf127, and XPNPEP2), provided a predictive model for the development of severe hemoglobin reduction. In conclusion, this study showed the feasibility of using S-1 at 35 mg/m(2) bid in gastric cancer. We suggest that the pharmacogenomic markers identified in this study may be potential candidates for predicting anemia after S-1 treatment.

Successful treatment of advanced gastric cancer by surgical resection following combination chemotherapy with oral S-1 and biweekly paclitaxel

We report on the successful treatment of advanced gastric cancer by surgical resection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A 67-year-old man was referred to our hospital with a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Meticulous examination, however, revealed the presence of gastric cancer with ascites and large lymph node metastasis adjacent to the pancreas. We selected combination chemotherapy with oral S-1 and biweekly paclitaxel. After two courses, both the primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes were greatly reduced, and the ascites had disappeared. Using laparoscopy, there was no evidence of peritoneal metastases, and the cytological examination was negative. The patient underwent distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection. Histological examination revealed that the cancer cells were still present in part, but no lymph node metastases were found. The tumor was pathologically diagnosed as pT2, pN0, P0, M0, CY0, and p-stage II. The patient is healthy over 4 years after surgery without recurrence.

Moderate Neutropenia with S-1 Plus Low-dose Cisplatin May Predict a More Favourable Prognosis in Advanced Gastric Cancer

AIMS

The effects of haematological adverse events on the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer were investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the association between haematological adverse events and prognosis in 23 patients with far advanced or recurrent gastric cancer treated with a JFMC27-9902 regimen consisting of an oral fluorouracil derivative S-1 plus low-dose cisplatin.

RESULTS

The patients who suffered grade 2-3 neutropenia (n = 10; median survival time [MST] 679 days) were found to have significantly more favourable prognoses than patients who developed grade 0-1 (n = 10; MST 271 days) or grade 4 neutropenia (n = 3; MST 408 days) (P = 0.0039 and 0.0112, respectively), although no significant differences were found among the clinicopathological factors of any grade groups. With respect to anaemia or thrombocytopenia, there were no significant differences among the MSTs of the groups stratified by toxicity grade. Multivariate survival analysis revealed that grade 2-3 neutropenia is an independent predictor of a more favourable prognosis (hazard ratio = 38.693, P = 0.0004).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that S-1 plus low-dose cisplatin against gastric cancer may contribute to long survival when it induces moderate neutropenia.

A pilot study of individualized maximum repeatable dose (iMRD), a new dose finding system, of weekly gemcitabine for patients with metastatic pancreas cancer

OBJECTIVES

We developed and established a new dose-finding system, the individualized maximum repeatable dose (iMRD), suitable to induce prolonged TTP rather than tumor shrinkage.

METHODS

We applied this system in weekly gemcitabine therapy for 18 metastatic pancreas cancer patients. We determined the iMRD at the 5th week, after weekly dose adjustments. We started at 500 mg/m2 (1/2 maximum tolerated dose) of gemcitabine and repeated the treatment with an increase or a decrease of 100 mg/m each week, if toxicity was 0 or more than grade 1, respectively.

RESULTS

The iMRD of weekly gemcitabine was 300 mg/m2 in 2 patients, 400 mg/m2 in 3 patients, 500 mg/m2 in 5 patients, 600 mg/m2 in 6 patients, and 700 mg/m2 in 2 patients, demonstrating significant differences among individual patients. Grade 3 marrow depression occurred in only 1 patient (5.6%). Of these 18 patients, 3 (16.7%), 13 (72.2%) and 2 (11.1%) patients showed partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease, respectively. The median of times to progressive disease and survival were 4.5 and 9.5 months, respectively. There were no significant differences in 1-year survival time and more than 50% reduction rate of serum CA19-9, a tumor marker for pancreatic cancer, between patients with lower (500 mg/m2 or less) and higher (600 mg/m2 or more) iMRD.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that iMRD is a simple method to determine an individual's tailored dose for chemotherapy and could be the optimal dose for patients with noncurable cancers such as metastatic pancreas cancer.