What influences the willingness of community physicians to provide palliative care for patients with terminal cancer? Evidence from a nationwide survey

Palliative care practices and their relationship to training: A cross-sectional study of community-oriented physicians

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the training methods family physicians (FPs) use to enhance their professional development in palliative care. We also determined the relationship between these methods and palliative care practice.

METHODS

A questionnaire survey was administered to 557 FPs. Palliative care practices were measured using the palliative care self-reported practices scale (PCPS;range 1-5), and associations among the eight indicators of FP palliative care training were considered. Quantile regression analysis was used for the analysis.

RESULTS

Valid responses were received from 307 FPs:99.4% of the FPs provided palliative care and home visits, and 92.8% received palliative care training. The PCPS score was higher in participants who reported having received palliative care training (adjusted coefficient, 0.4 [95% CI, 0.12-0.68]; P=0.004). The palliative care training method was found to be significantly associated with the PCPS score "Self-study through literature" (adjusted coefficient 0.18 [95% CI, 0.01-0.34]; P=0.03) and "Reflection on the practices" (adjusted coefficient 0.24 [95% CI, 0.08-0.4]; P=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

FPs actively provided palliative care in their communities and used various palliative care training methods for professional development. "Reflection on the practices" and "Self-study through literature" were important elements of community-based palliative care practice.

Home care practice behavior and its influencing factors of primary care providers: a multicenter cross-sectional study in Sichuan Province, China

BACKGROUND

Primary care providers play an important role in home health care, and their practice behavior is significant for care quality and patient outcomes. This study aimed to assess the home care practice behavior of Chinese primary care providers and to explore the factors associated with the practice behavior.

METHODS

A multicenter cross-sectional design with a convenience sample was used to survey 863 registered primary care providers from 62 primary health care settings in Sichuan Province, China. Descriptive statistics, t-test or ANOVA for one-way analysis, and Pearson's correlation analyses were used to compare the differences and examine the relationships between participants' demographics and experience of home care services and practice behavior. Multiple linear regression models were performed to identify salient variables associated with the practice behavior from among demographic and home care experience.

RESULTS

The score of home care practice behavior questionnaire was 97.25 ± 21.05. The average scores for the dimensions of home visit preparation, assessment, medical care behavior and safety practice were 3.70 ± 0.95, 3.76 ± 1.02, 3.66 ± 1.03, and 3.20 ± 0.46, respectively. Home care practice behavior was associated with working years, working experience in general hospitals, work area, home care experience such as client types of home care, service frequency and willingness, explaining 21.5% of the total variance.

CONCLUSION

Chinese primary care providers had a medium to high level of home care practice behavior but poor implementation of safety practice. The results may provide clues to increased focus and implementation of safety practice, as well as providing targeted measures based on influencing factors.

Primary care staff's willingness to participate in compassionate community network and palliative care and the barriers they face: a mixed methods study

OBJECTIVES

Compassionate community models, successfully applied in several Western countries, have not been extensively promoted in Asian countries. This study explored primary care staff's willingness to participate and factors associated with their participations in compassionate community education and network, palliative care education, providing palliative care and the barriers they faced.

METHODS

Adopting a mixed quantitative-qualitative design, primary care staffs in Beitou and Shilin districts in Taiwan, including physicians, nurses, pharmacists and administrative staff aged ≥20 years who had worked in a clinic for more than 2 months, were recruited. A questionnaire survey was conducted to explore their willingness to participate in compassionate community education and networks and palliative care education and care provision. Logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with their willingness, and qualitative perceptions were evaluated by open questions.

RESULTS

About half of the respondents were willing to participate in compassionate community education and network and palliative care education, but only 19.5% were willing to provide palliative care. Compared with other staff, primary care nurses showed significantly more willingness to participate in compassionate community education and network and palliative care education and to provide palliative care. However, physicians were significantly not willing to participate in any of the three services apart from providing care. Capability, administrative and manpower concerns, time, age and motivation were the main barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

To encourage primary care staff to participate more in compassionate community education and network and palliative care education and to provide palliative care, policymakers should pay more attention towards removing the barriers to their engagement.

Assessing Medical Students' Confidence towards Provision of Palliative Care: A Cross-Sectional Study

Under a surging demand for palliative care, medical students generally still show a lack of confidence in the provision in abroad studies. This cross-sectional study aims to investigate the confidence and its association with knowledge, attitude and exposure on providing palliative care among medical undergraduates with a self-administered questionnaire to improve the international phenomenon. Full-time local medical undergraduates were recruited to obtain information regarding the demographics, confidence, knowledge, attitude and exposure on palliative care; the information was collected from July 2020 to October 2020. Questions on confidence (10-items), knowledge (20-items), attitude (10-items) and exposure were referenced from validated indexes and designed from literature review. Confidence level was categorized into “Confident” and “Non-confident” as suggested by studies to facilitate data analysis and comparison. Of the 303 participants, 59.4% were “Non-confident” (95% C.I.: 53.8% to 65.0%) in providing palliative care on average. Among medical students, knowledge (p = 0.010) and attitude (p = 0.003) are significantly positively associated with the confidence to provide palliative care, while exposure to death of family/friends (p = 0.024) is negatively associated. This study begins an investigation on the research area in Hong Kong primarily. The confidence of local medical students should be enhanced to provide palliative care in their future. It thus highlights the importance of the medical curriculum and provides insights to remove barriers responsively to improve the overall confidence and the quality of palliative care.

Factors influencing GPs' perception of specialised palliative homecare (SPHC) importance - results of a cross-sectional study

Background

General Practitioners (GPs) are the main providers of primary palliative care (PPC). At the same time they are the main initiators of specialised palliative homecare (SPHC). In Germany, little is known about factors which influence GPs in their involvement of SPHC. Aim of our study is to identify factors that drive GPs to give value to and involve SPHC.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was performed. In 2018, questionnaires were mailed to 6000 randomly selected GPs from eight German federal states, focusing on the extent of GPs’ palliative care activities and their involvement of SPHC.

Results

With a response rate of 19.4% and exclusion of GPs working in SPHC-teams, n = 1026 questionnaires were appropriate for analysis. GPs valued SPHC support as the most “important/very important” for both “technical/invasive treatment measures” (95%) and availability outside practice opening hours (92%).

The most relevant factor influencing perceived SPHC-importance was GPs’ self-reported extent of engagement in palliative care (β = − 0.283; CI 95% = − 0.384;−0.182), followed by the perceived quality of utilised SPHC (β = 0.119; CI 95% = 0.048;0.190), involvement in treatment of palliative patients after SPHC initiation (β = 0.088; CI 95% = 0.042;0.134), and conviction that palliative care should be a central part of GPs’ work (β = − 0.062; CI 95% = − 0.116;−0.008). Perceived SPHC-importance is also associated with SPHC-referrals (β =0.138; p < 0.001). The lower the engagement of GPs in palliative care, the more they involve SPHC and vice versa.

Conclusions

GPs with low reported activity in palliative care are more likely to initialise SPHC for palliative care activities they do not deliver themselves for various reasons, which might mean that the involvement of SPHC is substitutive instead of complementary to primary palliative care. This finding and its interpretation should be given more attention in the future policy framework for (specialised) palliative homecare.

Trial registration

German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00014726, 14.05.2018.

Facilitators and barriers to general practitioner and general practice nurse participation in end-of-life care: systematic review

BACKGROUND

General practitioners (GPs) and general practice nurses (GPNs) face increasing demands to provide palliative care (PC) or end-of-life care (EoLC) as the population ages. To enhance primary EoLC, the facilitators and barriers to their provision need to be understood.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive description of the facilitators and barriers to GP and GPN provision of PC or EoLC.

METHOD

Systematic literature review. Data included papers (2000 to 2017) sought from Medline, PsycInfo, Embase, Joanna Briggs Institute and Cochrane databases.

RESULTS

From 6209 journal articles, 62 reviewed papers reported the GP's and GPN's role in EoLC or PC practice. Six themes emerged: patient factors; personal GP factors; general practice factors; relational factors; co-ordination of care; availability of services. Four specific settings were identified: aged care facilities, out-of-hours care and resource-constrained settings (rural, and low-income and middle-income countries). Most GPs provide EoLC to some extent, with greater professional experience leading to increased comfort in performing this form of care. The organisation of primary care at practice, local and national level impose numerous structural barriers that impede more significant involvement. There are potential gaps in service provision where GPNs may provide significant input, but there is a paucity of studies describing GPN routine involvement in EoLC.

CONCLUSIONS

While primary care practitioners have a natural role to play in EoLC, significant barriers exist to improved GP and GPN involvement in PC. More work is required on the role of GPNs.

Pediatric palliative care in the community

Early integration of pediatric palliative care (PPC) for children with life-threatening conditions and their families enhances the provision of holistic care, addressing psychological, social, spiritual, and physical concerns, without precluding treatment with the goal of cure. PPC involvement ideally extends throughout the illness trajectory to improve continuity of care for patients and families. Although current PPC models focus primarily on the hospital setting, community-based PPC (CBPPC) programs are increasingly integral to the coordination, continuity, and provision of quality care. In this review, the authors examine the purpose, design, and infrastructure of CBPPC in the United States, highlighting eligibility criteria, optimal referral models to enhance early involvement, and fundamental tenets of CBPPC. This article also appraises the role of CBPPC in promoting family-centered care. This model strives to enhance shared decision making, facilitate seamless handoffs of care, maintain desired locations of care, and ease the end of life for children who die at home. The effect of legislation on the advent and evolution of CBPPC also is discussed, as is an assessment of the current status of state-specific CBPPC programs and barriers to implementation of CBPPC. Finally, strategies and resources for designing, implementing, and maintaining quality standards in CBPPC programs are reviewed.