Long-term single-institute experience with trimodal bladder-preserving therapy with proton beam therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Efficacy and Safety of Bladder Preservation Therapy in Combination with Atezolizumab and Radiation Therapy (BPT-ART) for Invasive Bladder Cancer: Interim Analysis from a Multicenter, Open-label, Prospective Phase 2 Trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of radiation therapy with atezolizumab as bladder-preserving therapy for invasive bladder cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A multicenter, phase 2 study was conducted with patients with clinically T2-3 or very-high-risk T1 bladder cancer who were poor candidates for or refused radical cystectomy. The interim analysis of pCR is reported as a key secondary endpoint ahead of the progression-free survival rate primary endpoint. Radiation therapy (41.4 Gy to the small pelvic field and 16.2 Gy to the whole bladder) was given in addition to 1200 mg intravenous atezolizumab every 3 weeks. After 24 treatment weeks, response was assessed after transurethral resection, and tumor programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression was assessed using tumor-infiltrating immune cell scores.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients enrolled from January 2019 to May 2021 were analyzed. The most common clinical T stage was T2 (73.3%), followed by T1 (15.6%) and T3 (11.1%). Most tumors were solitary (77.8%), small (<3 cm) (57.8%), and without concurrent carcinoma in situ (88.9%). Thirty-eight patients (84.4%) achieved pCR. High pCR rates were achieved in older patients (90.9%) and in patients with high PD-L1-expressing tumors (95.8% vs 71.4%). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 93.3% of patients, with diarrhea being the most common (55.6%), followed by frequent urination (42.2%) and dysuria (20.0%). The frequency of grade 3 AEs was 13.3%, whereas no grade 4 AEs were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with radiation therapy and atezolizumab provided high pCR rates and acceptable toxicity, indicating it could be a promising option for bladder preservation therapy.

Selective multimodal bladder-sparing therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: the present and the future

INTRODUCTION

Despite the lack of level 1 evidence, selective bladder-sparing therapy using trimodal therapy is currently recommended by guidelines as a standard of care in patients with non-metastatic, muscle-invasive bladder cancer who are eligible for the treatment.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews major studies of selective, bladder-sparing therapy utilizing multiple modalities for muscle-invasive bladder cancer and those comparing the oncological outcomes between bladder-sparing therapy and radical cystectomy. Also discussed are predictive biomarkers potentially capable of guiding treatment decisions by patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer and a novel strategy for boosting the antitumor immune response in bladder-sparing therapy. PubMed databases were searched for records of 30 June 2023 or earlier.

EXPERT OPINION

Selective, bladder-sparing therapy appears to be underutilized at present. To promote its use, measures should be taken to facilitate the referral of eligible patients to specialist centers and broaden the number of facilities providing the therapy. Recent studies have suggested a prognostic benefit of radiotherapy for the primary lesion in patients with metastatic bladder cancer. Given that irradiation can induce the abscopal effect, particularly in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors, demand for bladder-sparing therapies may increase in the context of treatments for metastases.

Proton beam therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review and analysis with Proton-Net, a multicenter prospective patient registry database

To assess the safety and efficacy of proton beam therapy (PBT) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), we examined the outcomes of 36 patients with MIBC (cT2-4aN0M0) who were enrolled in the Proton-Net prospective registry study and received PBT with concurrent chemotherapy from May 2016 to June 2018. PBT was also compared with X-ray chemoradiotherapy in a systematic review (X-ray (photon) radiotherapy). The radiotherapy consisted of 40-41.4 Gy (relative biological effectiveness (RBE) delivered in 20-23 fractions to the pelvic cavity or the entire bladder using X-rays or proton beams, followed by a boost of 19.8-36.3 Gy (RBE) delivered in 10-14 fractions to all tumor sites in the bladder. Concurrently, radiotherapy was given with intra-arterial or systemic chemotherapy of cisplatin alone or in combination with methotrexate or gemcitabine. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and local control (LC) rates were 90.8, 71.4 and 84.6%, respectively, after 3 years. Only one case (2.8%) experienced a treatment-related late adverse event of Grade 3 urinary tract obstruction, and no severe gastrointestinal adverse events occurred. According to the findings of the systematic review, the 3-year outcomes of XRT were 57-84.8% in OS, 39-78% in PFS and 51-68% in LC. The weighted mean frequency of adverse events of Grade 3 or higher in the gastrointestinal and genitourinary systems was 6.2 and 2.2%, respectively. More data from long-term follow-up will provide us with the appropriate use of PBT and validate its efficacy for MIBC.

Development of a Management Algorithm for Acute and Chronic Radiation Urethritis and Cystitis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review was to summarize the current literature on the assessment and treatment of radiation urethritis and cystitis (RUC) for the development of an evidenced-based management algorithm.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The PubMed/MEDLINE database was searched by a multidisciplinary group of experts in January 2021.

RESULTS

In total, 48 publications were identified. Three different types of RUC can be observed in clinical practice: inflammation-predominant, bleeding-predominant, and the combination of inflammation- and bleeding-RUC. There is no consensus on the optimal treatment of RUC. Inflammation-predominant RUC should be treated symptomatically based on the existence of bothersome storage or voiding lower urinary tract symptom as well as on pain. When bleeding-predominant RUC has occurred, hydration and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HOT) should be used first and, if HOT is not available, oral drugs instead (sodium pentosane polysulfate, aminocaproic acid, immunokine WF 10, conjugated estrogene, or pentoxifylline + vitamin E). If local bleeding persists, focal therapy of bleeding vessels with a laser or electrocoagulation is indicated. In case of generalized bleeding, intravesical installation should be initiated (formalin, aluminium salts, and hyaluronic acid/chondroitin). Vessel embolization is a less invasive treatment with potentially less complications and good clinical outcomes. Open- or robot-assisted surgery is indicated in patients with permanent, life-threatening bleeding, or fistulae.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of RUC, if not self-limiting, should be done according to the type of RUC and in a stepwise approach. Conservative/medical treatment (oral and topic agents) should primarily be used before invasive (transurethral) treatments.

Bladder preservation therapy in combination with atezolizumab and radiation therapy for invasive bladder cancer (BPT-ART) - A study protocol for an open-label, phase II, multicenter study

Radical cystectomy (RC) is recommended for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) or highest-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Trimodal therapy (TMT) is the most favorable strategy among bladder preservation therapies (BPT) for patients who are ineligible for or refuse RC. However, referrals for TMT, especially following chemotherapy, are limited by the patient's condition. Therefore, new BPT approaches are needed. Atezolizumab inhibits programmed death-ligand 1, is well-tolerated in patient populations heavily dominated by renal insufficiency, and is expected to have synergistic anti-tumor effects in combination with radiation therapy (RT). Therefore, we have conducted this open-label phase II multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RT in combination with atezolizumab for T2-3 MIBC and highest-risk T1 NMIBC patients. This study was initiated in January 2019, and we aimed to enroll a total of 45 patients. The study is registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (Identifier: RCT2031180060).

Bladder preservation therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer: the past, present and future

Radical cystectomy is the gold standard treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer, but some patients have medically inoperable disease or refuse cystectomy to preserve their bladder function. Bladder preservation therapy with transurethral resection of the bladder tumor and concurrent chemoradiotherapy, known as trimodal treatment, is regarded to be a curative-intent alternative to radical cystectomy for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer during the past decade. After the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors, a world-changing breakthrough occurred in the field of metastatic urothelial carcinoma and many clinical trials have been conducted against non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Interestingly, preclinical and clinical studies against other malignancies have shown that immune checkpoint inhibitors interact with the radiation-induced immune reaction. As half of the patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer are elderly, and some have renal dysfunction, not only as comorbidity but also because of hydronephrosis caused by their tumors, immune checkpoint inhibitors are expected to become part of a new therapeutic approach for combination treatment with radiotherapy. Accordingly, clinical trials testing immune checkpoint inhibitors have been initiated to preserve bladder for muscle invasive bladder cancer patients using radiation and immune checkpoint inhibitors with/without chemotherapy. The objective of this review is to summarize the evidence of trimodal therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer during the past decade and to discuss the future directions of bladder preservation therapy in immuno-oncology era.

The updated outcomes of bladder-preserving trimodal therapy using a real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy system for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Objective

Bladder-preserving trimodal therapy is recognized as a promising alternative treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. We report the updated outcomes of muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients that were treated using our treatment protocol, which involves radiotherapy delivered with a real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy system.

Methods

Thirty-eight patients who were diagnosed with T2-T4N0M0 bladder cancer between 1998 and 2016 and had clinically inoperable disease or refused to undergo surgery were enrolled. The treatment protocol included maximal transurethral resection followed by whole-bladder radiotherapy (40 Gy). Concurrent nedaplatin-based chemotherapy was administered to patients with adequate renal function. At the time of the first evaluation (via transurethral resection of the tumor bed), fiducial markers were endoscopically inserted into the bladder wall around the tumor. A boost of 25 Gy was administered using the real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy system. The second evaluation (via transurethral resection of the tumor bed) was performed 6 months after the start of treatment. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox hazards analysis were used to analyze overall survival and cancer-specific survival.

Results

The median duration of the follow-up period was 28 months (range: 3–161 months). The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 54.9 and 41.2%, respectively. Twenty-five (65.8%) and twenty (74.1%) patients had achieved complete responses to chemoradiation at the first and second evaluations, respectively. In univariate and multivariate analyses, performance status was found to be significantly associated with overall survival [P = 0.03, hazard ratio: 3.48, 95% confidence interval: 1.15–10.6] and cancer-specific survival [P = 0.02, hazard ratio: 4.57, 95% confidence interval: 1.32–16.9], and sex was shown to be significantly associated with cancer-specific survival [P = 0.03, hazard ratio: 3.07, 95% confidence interval: 1.09–8.30].

Conclusions

Our bladder-preserving trimodal therapy protocol, which involves the use of a real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy system, produced an acceptable overall survival rate. This therapy is a reasonable alternative for patients that are medically unfit for or do not want to undergo cystectomy.

Proton beam therapy for renal pelvis and ureter cancer: A report of 5 cases and a literature review

Standard treatment for localized renal pelvis and ureter cancer is surgery. Previously, the primary role of radiation therapy (RT) in cancer treatment was to control pain and hemostasis as palliative or as adjuvant therapy following surgery. In this report, we describe 5 patients with the disease treated with proton beam therapy (PBT) as curative treatment. Between September 2009 and July 2013, 5 males with renal pelvis (n=3) or ureter (n=2) cancer were treated by PBT with hypofractionated [72.6 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE)/22 fractions] or conventional [64-66 Gy (RBE)/32-33 fractions] fractionation. The median patient age was 72 years (range, 59-85 years). Three patients were deemed unfit for surgery. Local hypofractionated PBT was performed in 2 patients with T1-2N0M0 diseases, while prophylactic lymph node irradiation using a patch irradiation technique was performed for the remaining 3 patients, who had T3-4 disease. Two patients with T3-4 disease received chemotherapy prior to definitive PBT. No serious acute or late toxicities were observed in any patient. Local tumor control was achieved in 3 patients (60%); however, distant metastases were observed in 2 patients. Four of the five patients (80%) evaluated in the present study survived for >3 years. The data is limited; however, PBT appears to be a potential option for patients with renal pelvis or ureter cancer, especially for those who are unsuitable for radical surgery.

Biodistribution of gold nanoparticles in BBN-induced muscle-invasive bladder cancer in mice

Bladder-sparing options are being developed for muscle-invasive bladder cancer in place of radical cystectomy, including the combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy. We reasoned that improving the radiotherapy component of chemoradiation could improve the control of locally advanced disease. Previously, we showed that gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) are potent enhancers of radiation therapy. We hypothesized that if AuNPs were to preferentially localize to bladder tumors, they may be used to enhance the radiation component of muscle-invasive bladder tumor therapy. Mice were treated with the carcinogen N-butyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl)nitrosamine (BBN) for 17, 20, and 22 weeks - long enough to induce muscle-invasive tumors. Mice were then anesthetized and injected intravenously with 1.9 nm AuNPs of which most were rapidly cleared from the blood and excreted after a 30-50 minute residence time in the bladder. We found AuNPs distributed throughout the bladder wall, but most of the AuNPs were associated with the stroma surrounding the tumor cells or extracellular keratin produced by the tumor cells. There were relatively few AuNPs in the tumor cells themselves. The AuNPs therefore localized to tumor-associated stroma and this tumor specificity might be useful for specific X-ray dose enhancement therapy of muscle-invasive bladder carcinomas.