Postmarketing surveillance study of erlotinib plus gemcitabine for pancreatic cancer in Japan: POLARIS final analysis

Real-world incidence of and risk factors for abemaciclib-induced interstitial lung disease in Japan: a nested case-control study of abemaciclib-induced interstitial lung disease (NOSIDE)

PURPOSE

The exact incidence of and risk factors for interstitial lung disease (ILD), a serious side effect of abemaciclib, remain unknown in real-world settings. We examined the incidence of and risk factors for abemaciclib-induced ILD in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) in Japan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective clinical information was collected from charts of patients with ABC who had started abemaciclib treatment at 77 participating institutions between November 30, 2018 and December 31, 2019. The clinical information of patients who developed ILD (including suspected cases) were reviewed by an independent committee of extramural experts to adjudicate abemaciclib-induced ILD. We performed a nested case-control study for efficient identification of ILD risk factors and conducted multivariate Cox regression analysis to identify independent predictors of ILD.

RESULTS

Among patients taking abemaciclib, the incidence of abemaciclib-induced ILD was 5.0% (n = 59/1189), and the mortality rate was 0.7% (n = 8). The timing of ILD onset varied but occurred most frequently within 180 days of beginning abemaciclib treatment (64.4%). The incidence of abemaciclib-induced ILD was significantly associated with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥ 2 [hazard ratio (HR) 5.03; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.26-11.11] or a past medical history of interstitial pneumonia (IP) (HR 6.49; 95% CI 3.09-13.70).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we have for the first time determined the real-world incidence of and risk factors for abemaciclib-induced ILD in Japan. Although abemaciclib-induced ILD is serious in real-world settings, careful patient selection and close monitoring of those with poor ECOG PS and/or a history of IP may minimize ILD risk. This study was registered on the UMIN registry (Date: May 11, 2020/ ID: UMIN000040357).

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Management and End-of-life Care of Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer

Objective The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has altered the delivery of medical care. The present study evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on the outcomes of unresectable pancreatic cancer (PC) patients who received end-of-life care. Methods We retrospectively compared the management of PC patients during the COVID-19 pandemic (from April 2020 to March 2021) to the preceding year, which was unaffected by the pandemic (from April 2019 to March 2020), based on a prospectively maintained institutional database. Results A total of 178 patients were included in the COVID-19-exposed group and 201 patients were included in the COVID-19-unexposed group. The median overall survival was similar between the groups (exposed vs. unexposed: 12.6 vs. 11.9 months, p=0.174). Treatment regimens and relative dose intensities and the progression-free survival of GnP (gemcitabine in combination with nab-paclitaxel) and mFOLFIRINOX as first- and second-line chemotherapy did not differ significantly between the two groups. Only 9.0% of patients died at home in the COVID-19-unexposed group, compared to 32.0% in the COVID-19-exposed group (p<0.001). A multivariate analysis revealed that death during the COVID-19 exposed period was independently associated with home death (odds ratio: 4.536, 95% confidence interval: 2.527-8.140, p<0.001). Conclusions While the COVID-19 pandemic did not seem to influence chemotherapeutic treatment for PC patients at our institution, it had a large impact on end-of-life care. These findings may promote discussion about end-of-life care in Japan.

Risk factors for interstitial lung disease induced by gemcitabine plus albumin-bound paclitaxel therapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients

Background

Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) therapy is used for unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, but may cause interstitial lung disease (ILD) as a serious side effect. However, the risk factors for ILD in patients receiving GnP therapy are not well established. Here, we retrospectively investigated the incidence of GnP-induced ILD in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients, and the risk factors.

Methods

We investigated the patients’ background, laboratory data, previous treatment history, concomitant medications, number of doses of GnP, cumulative dosage and administration period, and occurrence of side effects.

Results

Of the 105 patients included in this study, ILD occurred in 10 (9.5%). Patients with ILD had a significantly higher frequency of concomitant treatment with Kampo medicines, especially goshajinkigan, which is considered to help prevent chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) (odds ratio: 11.5, 95% confidence interval: 2.67–49.38). No significant differences were observed in other clinical characteristics. Notably, the severity of CIPN in patients who used goshajinkigan for prevention was not significantly different from that in patients who did not use goshajinkigan in this study.

Conclusions

These results suggest that administration of goshajinkigan to patients receiving GnP therapy for prevention of CIPN may need to be reconsidered.

Treatment outcomes of erlotinib plus gemcitabine as late-line chemotherapy in unresectable pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE

With the introduction of modified FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel therapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer, erlotinib plus gemcitabine therapy is now occasionally used as late-line therapy. This study investigates outcomes of treatment with erlotinib plus gemcitabine for unresectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed consecutive patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer treated with erlotinib plus gemcitabine as the third or later-line chemotherapy between March 2014 and December 2020 in our hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients were included (third line/fourth or later line = 42/14). All patients were previously treated with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and 45 patients were previously treated with modified FOLFIRINOX. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 1.6 and 4.6 months, respectively. The disease control rate was 21.4%. Performance status, modified Glasgow prognostic score and carcinoembryonic antigen level were independently associated with survival. Our prognostic model using these parameters could classify patients into good (n = 32) and poor (n = 24) prognostic groups. The median PFS and OS were longer in good than in poor prognostic group, but the difference in PFS was very small (PFS: 2.1 vs. 1.4 months, P = 0.01. OS: 6.8 vs. 2.4 months, P < 0.01). Interstitial pneumonia occurred in one patient (1.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Benefits of erlotinib plus gemcitabine as late-line chemotherapy were limited, particularly with respect to PFS. Development of more effective third-line treatment options is desirable in the future.

Risk factors for gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel-induced interstitial lung disease in pancreatic cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the most serious adverse events with a high mortality rate and represents a serious clinical problem. However, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP)-induced ILD in pancreatic cancer (PC) patients has not been thoroughly investigated. Therefore, we conducted this study to examine the clinical characteristics of GnP-induced ILD and identify risk factors for developing ILD.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated consecutive patients with PC who received GnP between January 2015 and April 2020. We compared the clinical characteristics and overall survival (OS) according to ILD occurrence and explored risk factors including ABO blood type for developing ILD.

RESULTS

Of the 910 patients included in this study, ILD occurred in 20 patients (2.2%). PC patients who developed ILD had a significantly higher frequency of blood type B compared to those without ILD (42% vs. 22%, p ˂ 0.05). Other baseline characteristics including smoking history and current/previous lung disease were not different between the two groups. Median time from initiation of GnP to onset of ILD was 80 days. All patients recovered from ILD and OS was not significantly different according to ILD occurrence. Multivariate analysis revealed that blood type B was an independent risk factor for developing ILD.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that GnP-induced ILD occurred in 2.2% of PC patients with no mortality and OS did not differ according to ILD occurrence. Furthermore, we clarified that ABO blood type B was an independent risk factor for developing ILD in PC patients receiving GnP.

A Retrospective Look at Anti-EGFR Agents in Pancreatic Cancer Therapy

Background:

The introduction of Monoclonal Antibodies (mAbs) and small-molecule Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) that target the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), marks a huge step forward in the Pancreatic Cancer (PC) therapy. However, anti-EGFR therapy is found to be successful only in a fraction of patients. Although anti-EGFR agents have shown considerable clinical promise, a serious adverse event associated with anti- EGFR therapy has been challenging. At this juncture, there is still more to be done in the search for effective predictive markers with therapeutic applicability.

Methods:

A focused literature search was conducted to summarize the existing evidence on anti-EGFR agents in pancreatic cancer therapy.

Results:

This review discusses various anti-EGFR agents currently in use for PC therapy and potential adverse effects associated with it. Existing evidence on EGFR TKIs demonstrated better tolerant effects and outcomes with multiple toxic regimens. Anti-EGFR therapy in combination with chemotherapy is necessary to achieve the best clinical outcomes.

Conclusion:

Future prospective studies on the identification of additional biological agents and novel anti-EGFR agents are warranted.

Molecular targeted and immune checkpoint therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Molecular targeted therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has changed markedly. Although sorafenib was used in clinical practice as the first molecular targeted agent in 2007, the SHARPE and Asian-Pacific trials demonstrated that sorafenib only improved overall survival (OS) by approximately 3 months in patients with advanced HCC compared with placebo. Molecular targeted agents were developed during the 10-year period from 2007 to 2016, but every test of these agents from phase II or phase III clinical trial failed due to a low response rate and high toxicity. In the 2 years after, 2017 through 2018, four successful novel drugs emerged from clinical trials for clinical use. As recommended by updated Barcelona Clinical Liver cancer (BCLC) treatment algorithms, lenvatinib is now feasible as an alternative to sorafenib as a first-line treatment for advanced HCC. Regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab are appropriate supplements for sorafenib as second-line treatment for patients with advanced HCC who are resistant, show progression or do not tolerate sorafenib. In addition, with promising outcomes in phase II trials, immune PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab have been applied for HCC treatment. Despite phase III trials for nivolumab and pembrolizumab, the primary endpoints of improved OS were not statistically significant, immune PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint therapy remains to be further investigated. This review summarizes the development and progression of molecular targeted and immune-based checkpoint therapies in HCC.

A Phase I clinical trial of EUS-guided intratumoral injection of the oncolytic virus, HF10 for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Prognosis of pancreatic cancer is poor with a 5-year survival rate of only 7%. Although several new chemotherapy treatments have shown promising results, all patients will eventually progress, and we need to develop newer chemotherapy treatments to improve response rates and overall survival (OS). HF10 is a spontaneously mutated oncolytic virus derived from a herpes simplex virus-1, and it has potential to show strong antitumor effect against malignancies without damaging normal tissue. We aimed to evaluate the safety and anti-tumor effectiveness in phase I dose-escalation trial of direct injection of HF10 into unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guidance in combination with erlotinib and gemcitabine administration. The mid-term results have been previously reported and here we report the final results of our study.

METHODS

This was a single arm, open-label Phase I trial. HF10 was injected once every 2 weeks and continued up to four times in total unless dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) appears. A total of nine subjects in three Cohorts with dose-escalation were planned to be enrolled in this trial. The primary endpoint was the safety assessment and the secondary endpoint was the efficacy assessment.

RESULTS

Twelve patients enrolled in this clinical trial, and ten subjects received this therapy. Five patients showed Grade III myelosuppression and two patients developed serious adverse events (AEs) (perforation of duodenum, hepatic dysfunction). However, all of these events were judged as AEs unrelated to HF10. Tumor responses were three partial responses (PR), four stable diseases (SD), and two progressive diseases (PD) out of nine subjects who completed the treatment. Target lesion responses were three PRs and six SDs. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 6.3 months, whereas the median OS was 15.5 months. Two subjects from Cohort 1 and 2 showed downstaging and finally achieved surgical complete response (CR).

CONCLUSIONS

HF10 direct injection under EUS-guidance in combination with erlotinib and gemcitabine was a safe treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Combination therapy of HF10 and chemotherapy should be explored further in large prospective studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was prospectively registered in UMIN-CTR (UMIN000010150) on March 4th, 2013.