Metastatic pathways to the lower zone by segment in patients with clinical T1 lower lobe non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Segmentectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection (LND) may increasingly be used for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lymph node metastasis (LNM) distribution varies by lower lobe segments; however, its segment-specific spread to the lower zone (#8, 9) (LZ) in lower lobe NSCLC is seldom reported.

METHODS

In total, 352 patients with clinical T1 lower lobe NSCLC who underwent lobectomy with systematic or lobe-specific LND were included for analysis between January 2006 and December 2018.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight (16.2%) patients had LNM (pN1: 24, pN2: 34), and nine (2.6%) had LZ metastasis. LZ metastasis was significantly more frequent in tumors with diameter > 2 cm, tumors without ground-glass opacity on radiological findings, left lung cancer, and basal segment lung cancer (respectively, p = 0.039, 0.006, 0.0177, 0.0024). None of the S6 NSCLC patients had LZ metastasis. Two patients with right basal segment NSCLC had LZ metastases (tumor on S10) as well as N1 lymph node and subcarinal zone metastasis. Seven (8.4%) patients with left basal segment NSCLC had LZ metastasis (tumor on S8: 3, tumor on S10: 4). Of them, three patients with left basal NSCLC had isolated LZ metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

The LND of the LZ can be omitted for clinical T1 patients with S6 NSCLC. In addition, the LND of the LZ may be omitted in right basal NSCLC if intraoperative confirmation of negative N1 and subcarinal zone lymph nodes is obtained; however, it is necessary for left basal segment NSCLC.

Impact of the number of dissected lymph nodes on machine learning-based prediction of postoperative lung cancer recurrence: a single-hospital retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The optimal number of lymph nodes to be dissected during lung cancer surgery to minimise the postoperative recurrence risk remains undetermined. This study aimed to elucidate the impact of the number of dissected lymph nodes on the risk of postoperative recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using machine learning algorithms and statistical analyses.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 650 patients with NSCLC who underwent complete resection. Five machine learning models were trained using clinicopathological variables to predict postoperative recurrence. The relationship between the number of dissected lymph nodes and postoperative recurrence was investigated in the best-performing model using Shapley additive explanations values and partial dependence plots. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to estimate the HR for postoperative recurrence based on the number of dissected nodes.

RESULTS

The random forest model demonstrated superior predictive performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.92, accuracy: 0.83, F1 score: 0.64). The partial dependence plot of this model revealed a non-linear dependence of the number of dissected lymph nodes on recurrence prediction within the range of 0-20 nodes, with the weakest dependence at 10 nodes. A linear increase in the dependence was observed for ≥20 dissected nodes. A multivariable analysis revealed a significantly elevated risk of recurrence in the group with ≥20 dissected nodes in comparison to those with <20 nodes (adjusted HR, 1.45; 95% CI 1.003 to 2.087).

CONCLUSIONS

The number of dissected lymph nodes was significantly associated with the risk of postoperative recurrence of NSCLC. The risk of recurrence is minimised when approximately 10 nodes are dissected but may increase when >20 nodes are removed. Limiting lymph node dissection to approximately 20 nodes may help to preserve a favourable antitumour immune environment. These findings provide novel insights into the optimisation of lymph node dissection during lung cancer surgery.

Lymph node dissection in small peripheral lung cancer: Supplemental analysis of JCOG0802/WJOG4607L

OBJECTIVE

The optimal region of lymph node dissection (LND) during segmentectomy in patients with small peripheral non-small cell lung cancer requires clarification. Through a supplemental analysis of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 0802/West Japan Oncology Group (WJOG) 4607L, we investigated the associated factors, distribution, and recurrence pattern of lymph node metastases (LNMs) and proposed the optimal LND region.

METHODS

Of the 1106 patients included in the JCOG0802/WJOG4607L, 1056 patients with LNDs were included in this supplemental analysis. We investigated the distribution and recurrence pattern of LNMs along with the radiologic findings (with ground-glass opacity, part-solid tumor; without ground-grass opacity component, pure-solid tumor).

RESULTS

The radiologic findings were the only significant factor for LNMs. Of 533 patients with part-solid tumors, 8 (1.5%) had LNMs. Further, only 3 (0.5%) patients had pN2 disease, and no patients had interlobar LNMs from nonadjacent segments. Of the 523 patients with pure-solid tumors, 55 (10.5%) had LNMs, and 28 (5.4%) had pN2 disease. Five patients had metastases to nonadjacent interlobar lymph nodes (LNs). Two (2.0%) patients with S6 tumors had upper mediastinal LNMs. In addition, the incidence of mediastinal LN recurrence in patients with S6 lung cancer was greater in those who underwent selective LND than those who underwent systematic LND (P = .0455).

CONCLUSIONS

Nonadjacent interlobar and mediastinal LND have little impact on pathologic nodal staging in patients with part-solid tumors. In contrast, selective LND is recommended at least for patients with pure-solid tumors.

The Lung Cancer Surgical Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group: outstanding contribution and entering a new phase

The Lung Cancer Surgical Study Group (LCSSG) of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) was organized in 1986 and initially included 26 collaborative institutions, which has increased to 52 institutions currently. JCOG-LCSSG includes thoracic surgeons, medical oncologists, pathologists, and radiotherapists. In the early period, the JCOG-LCSSG mainly focused on combined modality therapies for lung cancer. Since the 2000s, the JCOG-LCSSG has investigated adequate modes of surgical resection for small-sized and peripheral non-small cell lung cancer and based on the radiological findings of whole tumor size and ground-glass opacity. Trials, such as JCOG0802, JCOG0804, and JCOG1211, have shown the appropriateness of sublobar resection, which has significantly influenced routine clinical practice. With the introduction of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, treatment strategies for lung cancer have changed significantly. Additionally, with the increasing aging population and medical costs, tailored medicine is strongly recommended to address medical issues. To ensure comprehensive treatment, strategies, including surgical and nonsurgical approaches, should be developed. Currently, the JCOG-LCSSG has conducted numerous clinical trials to adjust the diversity of lung cancer treatment strategies. This review highlights recent advancements in the surgical field, current status, and future direction of the JCOG-LCSSG.

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Revision of the Classification of Residual Tumor After Resection for the Forthcoming (Ninth) Edition of the TNM Classification of Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

The goal of surgical resection is to completely remove a cancer; it is useful to have a system to describe how well this was accomplished. This is captured by the residual tumor (R) classification, which is separate from the TNM classification that describes the anatomic extent of a cancer independent of treatment. The traditional R-classification designates as R0 a complete resection, as R1 a macroscopically complete resection but with microscopic tumor at the surgical margin, and as R2 a resection that leaves gross tumor behind. For lung cancer, an additional category encompasses situations in which the presence of residual tumor is uncertain.

METHODS

This paper represents a comprehensive review of evidence regarding these R categories and the descriptors thereof, focusing on studies published after the year 2000 and with adjustment for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Consistent discrimination between complete, uncertain, and incomplete resection is revealed with respect to overall survival. Evidence regarding specific descriptors is generally somewhat limited and only partially consistent; nevertheless, the data suggest retaining all descriptors but with clarifications to address ambiguities.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of this review, the R-classification for the ninth edition of stage classification of lung cancer is proposed to retain the same overall framework and descriptors, with more precise definitions of descriptors. These refinements should facilitate application and further research.

Preoperative evaluation of visceral pleural invasion in peripheral lung cancer utilizing deep learning technology

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the efficiency of artificial intelligence (AI) in the detection of visceral pleural invasion (VPI) of lung cancer using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) images, which is challenging for experts because of its significance in T-classification and lymph node metastasis prediction.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis was conducted on preoperative HRCT images of 472 patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), focusing on lesions adjacent to the pleura to predict VPI. YOLOv4.0 was utilized for tumor localization, and EfficientNetv2 was applied for VPI prediction with HRCT images meticulously annotated for AI model training and validation.

RESULTS

Of the 472 lung cancer cases (500 CT images) studied, the AI algorithm successfully identified tumors, with YOLOv4.0 accurately localizing tumors in 98% of the test images. In the EfficientNet v2-M analysis, the receiver operating characteristic curve exhibited an area under the curve of 0.78. It demonstrated powerful diagnostic performance with a sensitivity, specificity, and precision of 76.4% in VPI prediction.

CONCLUSION

AI is a promising tool for improving the diagnostic accuracy of VPI for NSCLC. Furthermore, incorporating AI into the diagnostic workflow is advocated because of its potential to improve the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis and patient outcomes in NSCLC.

Lymph node dissection in lung cancer surgery

Lung cancer, a leading cause of cancer-related death, often requires surgical resection for early-stage cases, with recent data supporting less invasive resections for tumors smaller than 2 cm. Central to resection is lymph node assessment, an area of controversy worldwide, compounded by advances in minimally invasive techniques. The review aims to assess current standards for lymph node assessment, recent data from the surgical era, and the immunobiological basis of how lymph node metastases impact patient outcomes. The British Thoracic Society guidelines recommend systematic nodal dissection during lung cancer resection, without specifying node removal or sampling. Historical data on mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) survival benefits are inconclusive, although proponents argue for lower recurrence rates. Recent trials such as ACOSOG Z0030 found no survival difference between MLND and nodal sampling, reinforcing the need for robust staging. While lobe-specific dissection strategies have been proposed, they currently lack consensus. JCOG1413 aims to compare the clinical benefits of lobe-specific and systematic dissection. TNM-9 staging revisions emphasize the prognostic significance of single-station N2 involvement. Robotic surgery shows promise, with trials such as RAVAL, which reported comparable outcomes to video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and improved lymph node sampling. Immunobiological insights suggest preserving key immunological sites during lymphadenectomy, especially for patients receiving adjuvant immunotherapy. In conclusion, the standard lymph node resection strategy remains unsettled. The debate between systematic and selective dissection continues, with implications for staging accuracy and patient outcomes. As minimally invasive techniques evolve, robotic surgery emerges as an effective and low-risk approach to delivering optimal lymph node assessment.

Effect of examining lymph nodes count on mortality risk in resected T1 non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to estimate the effect of the examined lymph node count (ELNC) on the cancer-related mortality risk and non-cancer-related mortality risk in patients with resected T1 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients diagnosed as primary T1 NSCLC between 2000 and 2017 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the ELNC cutoff value, which was calculated based on overall survival outcomes. Propensity score matching was used to equalize the differences in baseline characteristics between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 38 242 resected T1 NSCLC patients were extracted from the database with the ELNC cutoff value of 8. After propensity score matching, 27 676 patients were included in this study. Examining ≥8 ELNC was associated with a more accurate assessment of lymph node (LN) metastasis and significantly improving the prognosis. These trends remained consistent in subgroup analysis by histology type. In competing risk mode, examining ≥8 LNs could significantly reduce the risk of death from lung cancer, risk of death from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and risk of death from cardiac diseases. In the subgroup analysis, these trends were consistent.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the mortality risk associated with lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cardiac diseases, at least 8 LNs should be examined in surgery for T1 NSCLC.

Extent of Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Small-Sized Peripheral Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer during Intentional Segmentectomy

PURPOSE

Segmentectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) are becoming standard procedures for small-sized (<2 cm) peripheral non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although the benefits of the less resected lung are proven, the extent of lymph node dissection remains unchanged.

METHODS

We studied 422 patients who underwent lobectomy with MLND (lobe specific or systemic) for small peripheral NSCLC with clinical N0 disease. Patients with middle lobectomy (n = 39) and a consolidation-to-tumor (C/T) ratio ≤0.50 (n = 33) were excluded. We investigated the clinical factors, lymph node metastasis distributions, and lymph node recurrence patterns of 350 patients.

RESULTS

Thirty-five (10.0%) patients had lymph node metastasis; none with C/T ratio <0.75 had lymph node metastasis and lymph node recurrence. None had solitary lymph node metastasis in the outside lobe-specific MLND. Six patients had mediastinal lymph node metastasis at the initial site of recurrence; none had mediastinal lymph node recurrence outside the lobe-specific MLND, except for two patients with S6 primary disease.

CONCLUSION

NSCLC patients with small peripheral tumors and a C/T ratio <0.75 during segmentectomy may not require MLND. The optimal MLND for patients with a C/T ratio ≥0.75, except for those with S6 primary, may be lobe-specific MLND.

A multicenter propensity score-matched analysis of lymphadenectomy in N1-positve lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Selective mediastinal lymph node dissection based on lobe-specific metastases is widely recognized in daily practice. However, the significance of mediastinal lymph node dissection for N1-positive tumors has not been elucidated.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 359 patients with N1-positive lung cancer who underwent lobectomy with systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection (systematic lymph node dissection) (n = 150) and lobe-specific mediastinal lymph node dissection (lobe-specific lymph node dissection) (n = 209). The operative and postoperative results and their propensity score-matched pairs were compared. The factors affecting survival were assessed using competing risk and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of recurrence and the cumulative incidence of cancer-specific death were not significantly different between systematic and lobe-specific lymph node dissection in entire cohort. In the propensity score-matched cohort (83 pairs), systematic lymph node dissection tended to detect N2 lymph node metastasis more frequently (55.4 vs. 41%, P = 0.087). Eleven patients (13.2%) in the systematic lymph node dissection group had a metastatic N2 lymph node 'in the systematic lymph node dissection field' that lobe-specific lymph node dissection did not dissect. The oncological outcomes between patients undergoing systematic lymph node dissection (5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence, 62.1%; 5-year cumulative incidence of cancer-specific death, 27.9%) and lobe-specific lymph node dissection (5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence, 60.1%; 5-year cumulative incidence of cancer-specific death, 23.3%) were similar. The propensity score-adjusted multivariable analysis for cumulative incidence of recurrence revealed that the prognosis associated with systematic lymph node dissection was comparable with the prognosis with lobe-specific lymph node dissection (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.67; P = 0.37).

CONCLUSIONS

The extent of lymph node dissection can affect accurate pathological staging; however, it was not associated with survival outcome in the treatment of N1-positive lung cancer.

Segmentectomy for patients with early-stage pure-solid non-small cell lung cancer

For decades, lobectomy has been the recommended surgical procedure for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including for small-sized lesions. However, two recent pivotal clinical trials conducted by the Japanese Clinical Oncology Group/West Japan Oncology Group (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L) and the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB140503), which compared the survival outcomes between lobectomy and sublobar resection (the JCOG0802/WJOG4607L included only segmentectomy, not wedge resection), demonstrated the efficacy of sublobar resection in patients with early-stage peripheral lung cancer measuring ≤ 2 cm. The JCOG0802/WJOG4607L demonstrated the superiority of segmentectomy over lobectomy with respect to overall survival, implying the survival benefit conferred by preservation of the lung parenchyma. Subsequently, the JCOG1211 also demonstrated the efficacy of segmentectomy, even for NSCLC, measuring up to 3 cm with the predominant ground-glass opacity phenotype. Segmentectomy has become the standard of care for early-stage NSCLC and its indications are expected to be further expanded to include solid lung cancers > 2 cm. However, local control is still a major concern for segmentectomy for higher-grade malignant tumors. Thus, the indications of segmentectomy, especially for patients with radiologically pure-solid NSCLC, remain controversial due to the aggressive nature of the malignancy. In this study, we reviewed previous studies and discussed the efficacy of segmentectomy for patients with such tumors.

Lymph node metastasis in cancer progression: molecular mechanisms, clinical significance and therapeutic interventions

Lymph nodes (LNs) are important hubs for metastatic cell arrest and growth, immune modulation, and secondary dissemination to distant sites through a series of mechanisms, and it has been proved that lymph node metastasis (LNM) is an essential prognostic indicator in many different types of cancer. Therefore, it is important for oncologists to understand the mechanisms of tumor cells to metastasize to LNs, as well as how LNM affects the prognosis and therapy of patients with cancer in order to provide patients with accurate disease assessment and effective treatment strategies. In recent years, with the updates in both basic and clinical studies on LNM and the application of advanced medical technologies, much progress has been made in the understanding of the mechanisms of LNM and the strategies for diagnosis and treatment of LNM. In this review, current knowledge of the anatomical and physiological characteristics of LNs, as well as the molecular mechanisms of LNM, are described. The clinical significance of LNM in different anatomical sites is summarized, including the roles of LNM playing in staging, prognostic prediction, and treatment selection for patients with various types of cancers. And the novel exploration and academic disputes of strategies for recognition, diagnosis, and therapeutic interventions of metastatic LNs are also discussed.

The Role of Lymphadenectomy in Early-Stage NSCLC

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The involvement of lymph nodes by the tumor has a strong impact on survival of patients. For this reason, lymphadenectomy plays a crucial role in the staging and prognosis of NSCLC, to define the most appropriate therapeutic strategies concerning the stage of the disease. To date, the benefit, in terms of survival, of the different extents of lymphadenectomy remains controversial in the scientific community. It is recognized that metastatic involvement of mediastinal lymph nodes in lung cancer is one of the most significant prognostic factors, in terms of survival, and it is therefore mandatory to identify patients with lymph node metastases who may benefit from adjuvant therapies, to prevent distant disease and local recurrences. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the role of lymphadenectomy in early-stage NSCLC in terms of efficacy and accuracy, comparing systematic, sampling, and lobe-specific lymph node dissection and analyzing the existing critical issue, through a search of the most relevant articles published in the last decades.

Selective Mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection Strategy for Clinical T1N0 Invasive Lung Cancer: A Prospective, Multicenter, Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to prospectively evaluate our previously proposed selective mediastinal lymph node (LN) dissection strategy for peripheral clinical T1N0 invasive NSCLC.

METHODS

This is a multicenter, prospective clinical trial in China. We set six criteria for predicting negative LN stations and finally guiding selective LN dissection. Consolidation tumor ratio less than or equal to 0.5, segment location, lepidic-predominant adenocarcinoma (LPA), negative hilar nodes (stations 10-12), and negative visceral pleural invasion (VPI) were used separately or in combination as predictors of negative LN status in the whole, superior, or inferior mediastinal zone. LPA, hilar node involvement, and VPI were diagnosed intraoperatively. All patients actually underwent systematic mediastinal LN dissection. The primary end point was the accuracy of the strategy in predicting LN involvement. If LN metastasis occurred in certain mediastinal zone that was predicted to be negative, it was considered as an "inaccurate" case.

RESULTS

A total of 720 patients were enrolled. The median number of LN dissected was 15 (interquartile range: 11-20). All negative node status in certain mediastinal zone was correctly predicted by the strategy. Compared with final pathologic findings, the accuracy of frozen section to diagnose LPA, VPI, and hilar node metastasis was 94.0%, 98.9%, and 99.6%, respectively. Inaccurate intraoperative diagnosis of LPA, VPI, or hilar node metastasis did not lead to inaccurate prediction of node-negative status.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first prospective trial validating the specific mediastinal LN metastasis pattern in cT1N0 invasive NSCLC, which provides important evidence for clinical applications of selective LN dissection strategy.

Clinical Benefits of Lobe-Specific Lymph Node Dissection in Surgery for NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

The impact of lobe-specific lymph node dissection (LS-LND) in surgery for NSCLC remains controversial compared with that of systematic lymph node dissection (S-LND). This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between the two strategies, including postoperative complications, and to explain the advantages of LS-LND.

Methods

We searched for studies comparing LS-LND and S-LND up to April 14, 2022, using PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. The primary outcomes were overall survival and recurrence-free survival. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, such as arrhythmia, chylothorax, and pneumonia. We evaluated the risk of bias and assessed the evidence quality using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach.

Results

A total of 13 studies, including one randomized controlled trial and 12 retrospective studies with 11,522 patients who underwent curative resections for lung cancer, were included. The results indicated that LS-LND had favorable overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-0.87) but no difference in recurrence-free survival (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.84-1.09) on comparison with S-LND. In terms of postoperative complications, patients undergoing LS-LND had a lower rate of chylothorax (risk ratio [RR] = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.35-0.85) and arrhythmia (RR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.57-0.97) than patients undergoing S-LND, but the risk of postoperative pneumonia was not different. The overall quality of evidence was low to moderate owing to the risk of bias related to heterogeneous study populations.

Conclusions

Patients undergoing LS-LND had a comparable and favorable long-term prognosis and a lower rate of postoperative complications. Nevertheless, further standardized studies are necessary to improve the quality of evidence.

Lymph node dissections and survival in sublobar resection of non-small cell lung cancer ≤ 20 mm

BACKGROUND

A randomized trial of lobectomy versus segmentectomy for small-sized (≤ 20 mm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) showed that patients who had undergone segmentectomy had a significantly longer overall survival (OS) than those who had lobectomy. More attention is needed regarding the required extent of thoracic lymphadenectomy in patients with small-sized NSCLC who undergo sublobar resection.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with clinically node-negative NSCLC ≤ 20 mm who had undergone sublobar resection between 2004 and 2017. OS of NSCLC patients by the number of lymph node dissections (LNDs) was analyzed using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards model. The cutoff value of the LNDs was set to 10 according to the Commission on Cancer's recommendation.

RESULTS

This study included 4379 segmentectomy and 23,138 wedge resection cases. The sequential improvement in the HRs by the number of LNDs was evident, and the HR was the lowest if the number of LNDs exceeded 10. Patients with ≤ 9 LNDs had a significantly shorter OS than those with ≥ 10 LNDs (hazard ratio [HR] 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40-1.61, P < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis revealed that performing ≤ 9 LNDs was an independent factor for predicting OS (HR for death: 1.34, 95% CI 1.24-1.44, P < 0.0001). These results remained significant in subgroup analyses by the type of sublobar resection (segmentectomy, wedge resection).

CONCLUSIONS

Performing ≥ 10 LNDs has a prognostic role in patients with small-sized NSCLC even if the resection is sublobar.

Long-term survival outcomes after lobe-specific nodal dissection in patients with early non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the long-term outcomes of lobe-specific nodal dissection (LSD) and systematic nodal dissection (SND) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients with c-stage I and II NSCLC who underwent lobectomy with mediastinal nodal dissection were retrospectively analysed. After propensity score matching, we assessed the overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cumulative incidence of death (CID) from primary lung cancer and other diseases.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 8.4 years. Among 438 propensity score-matched pairs, OS and RFS were similar between the LSD and SND groups [hazard ratio (HR), 0.979; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.799-1.199; and HR, 0.912; 95% CI, 0.762-1.092, respectively], but the LSD group showed a better prognosis after 5 years postoperatively. CID from primary lung cancer was similar between the 2 groups (HR, 1.239; 95% CI, 0.940-1.633). However, the CID from other diseases was lower in the LSD group than in the SND group (HR, 0.702; 95% CI, 0.525-0.938). According to c-stage, the LSD group tended towards worse OS and RFS, with higher CID from primary lung cancer than the SND group, in patients with c-stage II.

CONCLUSIONS

LSD provides acceptable long-term survival for patients with early-stage NSCLC. However, LSD may not be suitable for patients with c-stage II NSCLC due to the higher mortality risk from primary lung cancer.

Lobe-specific lymph node dissection in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: An overview

Lymph node dissection is a vital part of surgical treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lobectomy with systematic lymph node dissection (SLND) still remains the gold standard surgical treatment for early-stage NSCLC patients. However, an increasing number of studies have demonstrated that lobe-specific lymph node dissection (L-SLND) can be used as an alternative therapy for SLND in carefully selected patients with early-stage NSCLC. However, there are no currently available evidences of review summarizing the role of L-SLDN in treating early-stage NSCLC. Therefore, we performed this literature review by summarizing the existing literatures on the lymph node drainage pattern, definition, scope and role of L-SLND in patients with early-stage NSCLC, aiming to provide evidence for the application of L-SLND in patients with early-stage NSCLC.

Clinical impact of number of lymph nodes dissected on postoperative survival in node-negative small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a lethal histologic subtype of lung cancer. Although the Commission on Cancer recommends pathological examination of at least 10 lymph nodes dissected (LNDs) for resected early-stage non-small cell lung cancer, its survival benefit of LNDs in patients with early-stage SCLC is unknown.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for SCLC patients with clinical stage I-II and clinical N0, NX disease per AJCC 7^th edition who had undergone lobectomy between 2004 and 2017. Overall survival of SCLC patients by the number of LNDs was compared using Log-rank tests. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed.

RESULTS

In total, 688 (42%), 311 (20%), 247 (16%), 196 (12%), 126 (8%), and 36 (2%) of 1,584 patients with early-stage SCLC had ≥10, 7-9, 5-6, 3-4, 1-2, and 0 LNDs, respectively. The sequential improvement in the HRs was no longer evident if the number of LNDs exceeds 4. Patients with ≥3 LNDs (n = 1,422) had a significantly longer overall survival than those with <3 LNDs (n = 162) (hazard ratio for death: 0.76, 95% confidence interval: 0.62-0.94, P = 0.0087). Multivariate analysis revealed that ≥3 LNDs was an independent factor for predicting overall survival (hazard ratio for death: 0.76, 95% confidence interval: 0.61-0.93, P = 0.0083).

CONCLUSIONS

Although we are reluctant to recommend a definitive "optimal number" of LNDs, our findings suggest the prognostic and therapeutic roles for performing ≥3 LNDs in patients with early-stage SCLC who undergo lobectomy.

Visualization of patterns of lymph node metastases in non-small cell lung cancer using network analysis

Objective

We aimed to visualize complicated patterns of lymph node metastases in surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer by applying a data mining technique.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 783 patients underwent lobectomy or pneumonectomy with systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection for non-small cell lung cancer between January 2010 and December 2018. Surgically resected lymph nodes were classified according to the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer lymph node map. Network analysis generated patterns of lymph node metastases from stations 1 to 14, and the degree of connection between 2 lymph node stations was assessed.

Results

The median number of lymph nodes examined per patient was 20, and the pathological N category was pN0 in 428 cases, pN1 in 132, pN2 in 221, and pN3 in 2. N1 lymph node stations had strong associations with superior mediastinal lymph node stations for patients with primary tumors in the upper lobes and with station 7 for the lower lobes. There was also a connection from the N1 lymph node stations to superior mediastinal lymph node stations in the lower lobes. In the right middle lobe, an even distribution from station 12m toward stations 2R, 4R, and 7 was noted. We released an interactive web application to visualize these data: http://www.canexapp.com.

Conclusions

Lymph node metastasis patterns differed according to the lobe bearing the tumor. Our results support the need for clinical trials to further investigate selective mediastinal lymph node dissection.

Lobe-specific nodal dissection with intraoperative frozen section analysis for clinical stage-I non-small cell lung cancer: a validation study by propensity score matching

OBJECTIVE

Lobe-specific nodal dissection (LND) is increasingly used for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan; however, its treatment validity remains unclarified. Since 2013, LND has been used as a standard procedure for clinical stage-I (c-stage-I) NSCLC at our institution. We aimed to evaluate its validity using intraoperative frozen section analysis (FSA) for c-stage-I NSCLC.

METHODS

The participants comprised patients with NSCLC who underwent LND between 2013 and 2016 (n = 307) or systematic nodal dissection (SND) between 2002 and 2013 (n = 367) for c-stage-I disease. FSA was routinely performed in LND to examine at least three stations. Outcomes were compared between the LND and SND groups. Patients in whom LND was converted to SND due to metastasis on FSA of the sampled lymph node were still categorized into the LND group, i.e., intention-to-treat analysis. The prognostic impact was compared using propensity score matching.

RESULTS

The rate of conversion from LND to SND was 10.4%. Of the patients converted to SND, 12.5% had metastases outside the LND area. False-negative N2 results were detected in only 0.7% of the LND group patients after FSA. After matching, each group had 220 patients. There were no significant between-group differences in the lymph-node recurrence rate (7% vs. 6%), 5-year recurrence-free survival (80.1% vs. 79.0%), and overall survival (90.4% vs. 90.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

LND with intraoperative FSA is a valid modality that could serve as a standard surgical procedure for c-stage-I NSCLC. Intraoperative FSA may lower the residual lymph-node metastasis risk in LND.

Prediction of lymph node metastasis of clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer based on the tumor volume doubling time

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the volume doubling time is a preoperative predictor of lymph node metastasis of clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

The subjects of this retrospective study were 204 patients who underwent lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection for clinical stage IA NSCLC. We analyzed the relationship between lymph node metastasis and clinicopathological factors, including the volume doubling time.

RESULTS

Lymph node metastasis developed in 24 (11.8%) patients. Multivariable analysis identified consolidation diameter (Odds ratio = 1.407; 95% confidence interval, 1.007-1.966, p = 0.046) and the solid-part tumor volume doubling time (Odds ratio = 0.982; 95% confidence interval, 0.973-0.991, p < 0.001) as independent predictors of lymph node metastasis. The combination of a larger consolidation diameter (> 1.9 cm) and a shorter solid-part tumor volume doubling time (< 132 days) had sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 79.2%, 94.4%, and 92.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The consolidation diameter and solid-part tumor volume doubling time can be useful preoperative predictors of lymph node metastasis of clinical stage IA NSCLC.

Selective Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy or Complete Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy for Clinical Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Selective mediastinal lymphadenectomy (SML) and complete mediastinal lymphadenectomy (CML) are two main types of surgery conducted for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) plus lobectomy or segmentectomy. It is not known whether stage I NSCLC can benefit from CML. Using the meta-analytical method, our research aimed to find out the worth of SML and CML for the therapy of clinical stage I NSCLC.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Ovid, MEDLINE, Cochrane Controlled Trial Register (CENTRAL), Embase, and Google Scholar for literature published up to June 2021 to evaluate the comparative research and to assess the post-operative complications, overall survival rate, disease-free survival rate, and local and distant recurrence. This meta-analysis was conducted by combining the results of the reported incidences of post-operative complications, local and distant recurrence, and short- and long-term mortality. The pooled odds ratios (OR) and the 95% confidence intervals were calculated by random or fixed effects models to compare the effectiveness between these two methods.

RESULTS

Five retrospective studies and one randomized controlled trial study were included in our research. The six studies included a total of 5713 patients, of whom 1480 were assigned to the SML group and 4233 were assigned to the CML group. No statistically significant differences were found in the 1- and 5-year overall survival rates or the 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates between the two groups. However, the 3-year overall survival favored the SML group (P < 0.05). There were also no statistically significant differences between the local and distant metastasis. Among the postoperative complications, pneumonia, atelectasis, and prolonged air leak were more common in the CML group (P < 0.05). There were no differences in the prevalence of dysrhythmia, chylothorax, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or recurrent laryngeal nerve injury between the two groups, which may be due to the limited sample size.

CONCLUSION

Considering the comparable survival rates, disease control, and fewer postoperative complications in the evaluated participants, SML is the preferred treatment with less invasiveness for clinical stage I NSCLC.

What Should Thoracic Surgeons Consider during Surgery for Ground-Glass Nodules?: Lymph Node Dissection

Thoracic surgeons need to be aware of several important points regarding intraoperative lymph node dissection during surgery for non-small cell lung cancer with ground-glass opacities. The first point relates to the need for lymph node dissection during sublobar resection. Since even patients undergoing sublobar resection may benefit from lymph node dissection, it should be selectively performed according to adequate indications, which require further study. Second, there seems to be no difference in postoperative morbidity between systematic sampling and systematic dissection, but the survival benefit from systematic dissection remains unclear. The results of randomized controlled trials on this topic are conflicting, and their evidence is jeopardized by a high risk of bias in terms of the study design. Therefore, further randomized controlled trials with a sound design should investigate this issue. Third, more favorable survival outcomes tend to be positively associated with the number of examined lymph nodes. Minimum requirements for the number of examined lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer should be defined in the future. Finally, lobe-specific lymph node dissection does not have a negative prognostic impact. It should not be routinely performed, but it can be recommended in selected patients with smaller, less invasive tumors. Results from an ongoing randomized controlled trial on this topic should be awaited.

Prognostic value of uncertain resection for overall survival in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the R(un) category proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with NSCLC who underwent segmentectomy or lobectomy between 2014 and 2015 at our institution. Residual tumor (R) status was reclassified from the Union for International Cancer Control designation to the IASLC-proposed R classification [R0 and R(un)]. The underlying reasons for the R(un) reclassification were analyzed according to pathological stage, lymph node status, and resected lobe. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate the impacts of R(un) categorization on overall survival.

RESULTS

Of 355 cases, 44.5% were reclassified as R(un). The most common reason for the reclassification was insufficient number of harvested lymph nodes or no station 7 lymph nodes. When stratified by tumor location, the absence of station 7 lymph nodes was especially prominent in both the right and left upper lung resections. In the multivariate Cox regression model, IASLC R classification was associated with poor overall survival in node-positive cases (hazard ratio: 2.657; P =.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Various factors resulted in reclassification to R(un) because the R(un) group was highly heterogeneous. Careful consideration is required to determine whether R(un) classification can be used as an indicator of lymph node dissection quality. For advanced cases, the R(un) definition may be useful in predicting poor prognosis.

Minimally invasive open surgery (MIOS) for clinical stage I lung cancer: diversity in minimally invasive procedures

BACKGROUND

Many thoracic surgeons have tried to make lung cancer surgery less invasive. Among the minimally invasive approaches that are currently available, it is controversial which is optimal. Minimally invasive open surgery, i.e. hybrid video-assisted thoracic surgery, has been adopted for lung cancer surgery at our institute. The objective of this study was to evaluate minimally invasive open surgery in terms of perioperative outcomes over the most recent 5 years.

METHODS

Between 2015 and 2019, 2738 patients underwent pulmonary resection for lung cancer at National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan. Among them, 2174 patients with clinical stage I lung cancer who underwent minimally invasive open surgery were included. Several perioperative parameters were evaluated.

RESULTS

The patients consisted of 1092 men (50.2%) and 1082 women (49.8%). Lobectomy was performed in 1255 patients (57.7%), segmentectomy in 603 (27.7%) and wide wedge resection in 316 (14.5%). Median blood loss was 30 ml (interquartile range: 15-57 ml) for lobectomy, 17 ml (interquartile range: 10-31 ml) for segmentectomy and 5 ml (interquartile range: 2-10 ml) for wide wedge resection. Median operative time was 120 min (interquartile range: 104-139 min) for lobectomy, 109 min (interquartile range: 98-123 min) for segmentectomy and 59 min (interquartile range: 48-76 min) for wide wedge resection. Median length of postoperative hospital stay was 4 days (interquartile range: 3-5 days). The 30-day mortality rate was 0.08% for lobectomy, 0.17% for segmentectomy and 0.00% for wide wedge resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive open surgery for clinical stage I lung cancer is a feasible approach with a low mortality and a short hospital stay. Oncological outcomes need to be investigated.

Diversity of lymphatic flow in patients with lung cancer revealed by computed tomography lymphography

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to verify the optimal extent of lymph node dissection or sampling during lung cancer surgery based on the sentinel node (SN) map created by computed tomography (CT) lymphography.

METHODS

From April 2010 to January 2015, patients with clinical stage I non-small-cell lung cancer, who were candidates for lobectomy or segmentectomy with standard hilar and mediastinal lymph node dissection, and in whom bronchus reached the tumour, were enrolled. An ultrathin bronchoscope was inserted to the target bronchus under the guidance of virtual bronchoscopic navigation images. CT images of the chest were obtained 30 s after 2.5 ml of iopamidol was injected. SNs were identified when the maximum CT attenuation value of the lymph nodes on postcontrast CT images increased by 30 Hounsfield units or more compared with the precontrast images. Patients underwent lobectomy with standard lymph node dissection.

RESULTS

SNs were identified in 36 (87.8%) of the 41 patients. The average number of SNs was 1.6 (range, 1-4). There was 1 false negative case; therefore, the accuracy of SN identification was 97.2% (35/36). In 5 (13.9%) of 36 patients, SNs were outside the lobe-specific lymph node station range (#11i from right S1, #7 from right S1, #4R from right S8, #12u from right S8, #7 and #12l from left S1 + 2).

CONCLUSIONS

CT lymphography demonstrated the diversity of lymphatic spreading patterns and there were cases in which lymph flows are found outside the lymph node dissection range.

Systematic Versus Lobe-Specific Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy for Hypermetabolic Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The optimal extent of lymph node dissection (LND) for hypermetabolic tumors that are associated with high rates of nodal disease, recurrence, or mortality has not been elucidated.

METHODS

We reviewed 375 patients who underwent lobectomy with lymphadenectomy for clinical T2-3 N0-1 M0 hypermetabolic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) ≥ 6.60] via a multicenter database. Extent of LND was classified into systematic mediastinal LND (systematic LND) and lobe-specific mediastinal LND (lobe-specific LND). Postoperative outcomes after lobectomy with systematic LND (n = 128) and lobe-specific LND (n = 247) were analyzed for all patients and their propensity-score-matched pairs.

RESULTS

Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence-free interval (RFI) of the systematic LND group were not significantly different from those of the lobe-specific LND group in the nonadjusted whole cohort. In the propensity-score-matched cohort (101 pairs), systematic LND dissected significantly more lymph nodes (20.0 versus 16.0 nodes, P = 0.0057) and detected lymph node metastasis more frequently (53.5% vs. 33.7%, P = 0.0069). Six (5.9%) patients in the systematic LND group had a metastatic N2 lymph node "in the systematic LND field" that lobe-specific LND could not dissect. The systematic LND group tended to have better prognosis than the lobe-specific LND group (5-year CSS rates, 82.6% versus 69.6%; 5-year RFI rates, 56.6% vs. 47.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic LND was found to harvest more metastatic lymph nodes and provide better oncological outcome than lobe-specific LND in a cohort of hypermetabolic NSCLC patients.

Lobe-specific lymph node dissection in stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate lymph node (LN) metastasis according to tumour location and assess the impact of lobe-specific LN dissection on survival in stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the data of patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC treated with lobectomy and systematic LN dissection at Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) between June 2005 and April 2017. Patients who received neoadjuvant therapy had multiple primary tumours or missed the follow-up during the first postoperative year were excluded. The patients were divided into five groups according to involved lung lobes: right upper lobe (RUL), right middle lobe (RML), right lower lobe (RLL), left upper lobe (LUL) and left lower lobe (LLL), which were further divided into subgroups according to LN station metastasis. Overall survival (OS) and the incidence of metastasis were calculated for each subgroup. Efficacy indices (EIs) were calculated to determine the correlation between each lung lobe and LN station, and the impact of the dissection of these stations on survival.

RESULTS

A total of 1202 patients were analysed. The 5-year OS in the RUL, RML, RLL, LUL and LLL groups was 74%, 88%, 78%, 80% and 75%, respectively. The incidence of single LN station metastasis was 11%, 10%, 10%, 16% and 14%, respectively. The lobe-specific LNs for RUL, RML, RLL, LUL and LLL were stations 2/3/4, 4/7, 2/4/7, 4/5/6 and 6/7/9, respectively. Moreover, the LN stations with high EIs for RUL, RML, RLL, LUL and LLL were 4, 7, 7, 5 and 7, respectively. In the RUL group, the incidence of metastasis to stations 2, 3 and 4 was 2.3%, 0.5% and 7.6%, and the EI was 0.8, 0.3 and 4.3, respectively. In RML, the incidence of metastasis to stations 4 and 7 was 4% and 6%, and the EI was 1.3 and 2.4, respectively. In RLL, the incidence of metastasis to stations 2, 4 and 7 was 4.4%, 5.6% and 8.3%, and the EI was 1.3, 1.4 and 3.3, respectively. In LUL, the incidence of metastasis to stations 4, 5 and 6 was 1.4%, 11.8% and 2.5%, and the EI was 0.4, 7.1 and 0.5, respectively. In LLL, the incidence of metastasis to stations 6, 7 and 9 was 1.1%, 5.7% and 1.7%, and the EI was 0.6, 2.3 and 0.5, respectively. Furthermore, the OS of patients with lobe-specific LN metastasis was statistically significantly different from that of the non-lobe-specific LN metastasis group with P-values of <0.001 for RUL, 0.002 for RML, 0.002 for RLL, 0.001 for LUL and 0.003 for LLL.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the use of lobe-specific LN dissection in stage IA NSCLC. When LN stations with high EI were negative, LN metastasis in other stations was unlikely. The incidence of LN metastasis beyond lobe-specific LN stations was ∼1% in all subgroups. Dissection of non-lobe-specific LNs may not improve the OS; however, prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to modify the standard approach.

Pattern of recurrence of pN2 non-small-cell lung cancer: should postoperative radiotherapy be reconsidered?

OBJECTIVES

The prognosis of patients with mediastinal lymph node (LN) metastasis (pN2 stage III disease) is still unsatisfactory. Both systemic and local recurrence should be prevented after curative surgery. The aim of this study was to explore the pattern of recurrence in patients with completely resected pN2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the era of adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

We investigated 337 patients with completely resected cN0-1 and pN2 NSCLC from 2005 to 2016 at National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan. The patterns of recurrence were compared between patients who were managed by observation alone and those with adjuvant chemotherapy. In patients with regional LN recurrence, the pattern and site of recurrence were also explored.

RESULTS

There were 195 (58.5%) men and 142 (41.5%) women with a mean age of 63.2 years. Fifty-five (16.3%) patients developed only regional LN recurrence, 116 (32.6%) patients developed only distant recurrence and 65 (19.3%) patients developed both regional LN recurrence and distant recurrence. The difference in the pattern of recurrence between patients with observation alone and those with adjuvant chemotherapy was not statistically significant (P = 0.145). As for the pattern of regional LN recurrence, 68 (20.2%) patients had LN recurrence inside the systematic nodal dissection area.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional LN recurrence was observed in >30% of patients with completely resected pN2 NSCLC. About 20% of patients had recurrence inside the systematic nodal dissection area. Postoperative radiotherapy might be considered as an additional treatment strategy for these patients.

Extent of mediastinal nodal dissection in stage I non-small cell lung cancer with a radiological pure-solid appearance

BACKGROUND

Radiological pure-solid lung cancer denotes a high invasive nature compared to one that is part-solid. Mediastinal lymph nodal dissection (mLND) is a standard surgical procedure for nodal management in lung cancer surgery, however, the prognostic impact of the extent of mLND in pure-solid lung cancer is still unknown.

METHODS

We reviewed 459 patients with c-stage I radiological pure-solid lung cancer that underwent pulmonary lobectomy with mLND. Pure-solid was defined as a tumor showing only a consolidation without any ground glass opacity. The extent of mLND was classified into lobe-specific (L-mLND) and systematic (S-mLND). Prognostic significance of mLND was assessed by a multivariable analysis using propensity-score matching. Survivals were calculated by Kaplan-Meier methods using log-rank test.

RESULTS

Pathological nodal metastasis was found in 127 (27.6%) patients (hilar: 52 (11.3%), mediastinal: 75 (16.3%)). L-mLND was performed in 278 (61%) patients. A multivariable analysis did not show the survival difference for the extent of mLND (p = 0.266). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was not significantly different between S-mLND and L-mLND (74.3% vs. 72.7%, p = 0.712), which was similar even in 114 propensity-score matched pairs (78.8% vs. 79.9%, p = 0.665). While S-mLND showed a trend for survival benefit compared to L-mLND provided that the tumor showed higher standardized uptake value (SUVmax) (5y-OS: 70.0% vs. 59.2%, p = 0.093).

CONCLUSIONS

Prognostic impact of L-mLND was similar to S-mLND in c-stage I radiological pure-solid lung cancers in the propensity-score matched comparison. Among them, higher SUVmax value might be a promising indicator to decide the extent of mediastinal lymphadenectomy.

Finding the "True" N0 Cohort: Technical Aspects of Near-infrared Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To examine technical-, patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related factors associated with NIR guided SLN identification.

BACKGROUND

Missed nodal disease correlates with recurrence in early stage NSCLC. NIR-guided SLN mapping may improve staging and outcomes through identification of occult nodal disease.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 2 phase I clinical trials investigating NIR-guided SLN mapping utilizing ICG in patients with surgically resectable NSCLC.

RESULTS

In total, 66 patients underwent NIR-guided SLN mapping and lymphadenectomy after peritumoral ICG injection. There was significantly increased likelihood of SLN identification with injection dose ≥1 mg compared to <1 mg (65.2% vs 35.0%, P = 0.05), lung ventilation after injection (65.2% vs 35.0%, P = 0.05), and albumin dissolvent (68.1%) compared to fresh frozen plasma (28.6%) and sterile water (20.0%) (P = 0.01). In patients receiving the optimized ICG injection, there was significantly increased likelihood of SLN identification with radiologically solid nodules compared to sub-solid nodules (77.4% vs 33.3%, P = 0.04) and anatomic resection compared to wedge resection (88.2% vs 52.2%, P = 0.04). Disease-free and overall survival are 100% in those with a histologically negative SLN identified (n = 25) compared to 73.6% (P = 0.02) and 63.6% (P = 0.01) in patients with node negative NSCLC established via routine lymphadenectomy alone (n = 22).

CONCLUSIONS

SLN(s) are more reliably identified with ICG dose ≥1 mg, albumin dissolvent, post-injection lung ventilation, radiologically solid nodules, and anatomic resections. To date, N0 status when established via NIR SLN mapping seems to be associated with decreased recurrence and improved survival after surgery for NSCLC.

Lymph node assessment in early stage non-small cell lung cancer lymph node dissection or sampling?

Lymph node assessment is an essential component of the treatment of lung cancer. Identification of the correct "N" stage is important for staging which in turn determines treatment. Assessment of lymph nodes may be accomplished using imaging with CT scan and PET-CT, invasive techniques such as mediastinoscopy, endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) or endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). Ultimately, regardless of any pre-resection assessment, lymph nodes must be assessed at the time of resection. The question to be addressed in this report is the role of mediastinal lymph node dissection versus lymph node sampling. However, the issues surrounding lymph node assessment in NSCLC are complex, depending on clinical stage, imaging and histology.

Numbers and Stations: Impact of Examined Lymph Node on Precise Staging and Survival of Radiologically Pure-Solid NSCLC: A Multi-Institutional Study

Objectives

To determine the optimal number of examined lymph nodes (ELNs) and examined node stations (ENSs) in patients with radiologically pure-solid NSCLC and to investigate the impact of ELNs and ENSs on accurate staging and long-term survival.

Methods

Data from six institutions in the People’s Republic of China on resected c-stage Ⅰ to Ⅱ NSCLCs presenting as pure-solid tumors were analyzed for the impact of ELNs and ENSs on nodal upstaging, stage migration, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival by using multivariate models. The correlations between different end points and ELNs or ENSs were fitted with a smoother (using Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing tool), and the structural break points were determined by the Chow test.

Results

Both ELNs and ENSs were identified as prognostic factors for overall survival (ENS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.697; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.590–0.824; p < 0.001; ELN: HR, 0.945; 95% CI: 0.909–0.983; p = 0.005) and recurrence-free survival (ENS: HR, 0.863; 95% CI: 0.791–0.941; p = 0.001; ELN: HR, 0.960; 95% CI: 0.938–0.981; p < 0.001). Intraoperative ELNs and ENSs were found to be associated with postoperative nodal upstaging. Cut point analysis revealed an optimal cutoff of 16 LNs and five node stations for patients with c-stage Ⅰ to Ⅱ pure-solid NSCLCs, which were examined in our multi-institutional cohort.

Conclusions

Both ELNs and ENSs are associated with more accurate node staging and better long-term survival. We recommend 16 LNs and five stations as the cut point for evaluating the quality of LN examination for c-stage Ⅰ to Ⅱ patients with radiologically pure-solid NSCLCs.

Is lobe specific lymph node dissection adequate for cN0-1 non-small cell lung cancer?

Purpose

This study aims to explore whether lobe specific lymph node dissection (LND) is adequate for cN0–1 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or not.

Methods

Among 5613 cN0–1 NSCLC patients, 394 cases (7.0%) with pN2 were enrolled and the distribution of mediastinal lymph node metastasis was analyzed. The included patients were divided into the non-lobe specific lymph node metastasis (NLSLNM) group and the lobe specific lymph node metastasis (LSLNM) group. The clinicopathological characteristics were compared between two groups and multivariable analysis was performed to find independent factors predicting NLSLNM.

Results

The incidence of pN2 cases deserved serious attention. The proportion of upper zone lymph node metastases was not rare in right (55.0%) and left (35.7%) lower lobe tumors. The proportion of subcarinal zone lymph node involvement was also high in right (21.8%) and left (25.8%) upper lobe tumors. Multivariable analysis showed that elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (P = 0.034), right lower lobe (RLL) tumors (P = 0.022) and station 11 involvement (P = 0.030) were independent risk factors for NLSLNM.

Conclusion

Systematic LND seems to be superior to lobe specific LND in the assessment of lymph node status and high CEA level, RLL tumors and station 11 involvement are predictors for NLSLNM.

Minimizing residual occult nodal metastasis in NSCLC: recent advances, current status and controversies

Introduction: Nodal involvement in lung cancer is a significant determinant of prognosis and treatment management. New evidence exists regarding the management of occult lymph node metastasis and residual disease in the fields of imaging, mediastinal staging, and operative management.Areas covered: This review summarizes the latest body of knowledge on the identification and management of occult lymph node metastasis in NSCLC. We focus on tumor-specific characteristics; imaging modalities; invasive mediastinal staging; and operative management including, technique, degree of resection, and lymph node examination.Expert opinion: Newly identified risk-factors associated with nodal metastasis including tumor histology, location, radiologic features, and metabolic activity are not included in professional societal guidelines due to the heterogeneity of their reporting and uncertainty on how to adopt them into practice. Imaging as a sole diagnostic method is limited. We recommend confirmation with invasive mediastinal staging. EBUS-FNA is the best initial method, but adoption has not been uniform. The diagnostic algorithm is less certain for re-staging of mediastinal nodes after neoadjuvant therapy. Mediastinal node sampling during lobectomy remains the gold-standard, but evidence supports the use of minimally invasive techniques. More study is warranted regarding sublobar resection. No consensus exists regarding lymph node examination, but new evidence supports reexamination of current quality metrics.

Assessment of non-lobe-specific lymph node metastasis in clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The rationality of selective mediastinal lymph node dissection based on lobe-specific metastasis is still controversial. The correlation of lymph node metastasis in lobe-specific lymphatic drainage regions (LSDRs) and non-LSDRs has not been widely reported. The purpose of this study was to investigate the variables affecting nodal metastasis in non-LSDRs and to further evaluate the rationality of selective lymphadenectomy in clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

The clinicopathological information of 316 patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC who underwent lobectomy with systematic lymph node dissection between June 2014 and June 2018 was retrospectively collected for analysis.

RESULTS

The overall lymph node metastasis rate was 19.3%. For 35 patients with positive LSDR lymph nodes, the non-LSDR lymph node metastasis rate was 31.4%. Only one patient (0.4%) among 281 patients with negative LSDR lymph nodes had nodal spread in non-LSDRs. Univariate analysis identified that solid consistency, worse differentiation, and positive status in LSDRs were unfavorable predictive variables of lymph node metastasis in non-LSDRs. Multivariate analysis showed that nodal metastasis in LSDRs was the only independent predictor of nodal involvement in non-LSDRs (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

For patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC, non-LSDR lymph node metastasis mainly depends on the involvement of the LSDR lymph node. Our observations may indicate the potential implications for the reasonable management of lymphadenectomy in stage IA NSCLC patients.

Can lobe-specific lymph node dissection be an alternative to systematic lymph node dissection in treating early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis?

Background

Whether lobe-specific lymph node dissection (L-SLND) could serve as an alternative to systematic lymph node dissection (SLND) in treating early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted this comprehensive meta-analysis to compare the effect of L-SLND with that of SLND in treating early-stage NSCLC.

Methods

A systematic literature search in PubMed and Embase was conducted to identify relevant studies up to 30 November 2017. Data including 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates, recurrence rates, and morbidity rate were extracted and analysed.

Results

A total of six studies [one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and five retrospective cohort studies] consisting of 2,037 patients with early-stage NSCLC were included for analysis. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference of 5-year OS [81.7% and 79.5%, respectively; risk ratio (RR) =1.021; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.977-1.068; P=0.352] and DFS (76.4% and 69.9%, respectively; RR =1.061; 95% CI, 0.999-1.128; P=0.054) between patients treated with L-SLND and those with SLND. Moreover, there was also no significant difference of total recurrence rates (24.3% and 25.8%, respectively; RR =0.892; 95% CI, 0.759-1.048; P=0.166) and loco-regional recurrence rates (7.9% and 9.3%, respectively; RR =0.851; 95% CI, 0.623-1.162; P=0.310) between patients treated with L-SLND and those with SLND. However, patients treated with L-SLND yielded a significant lower morbidity rate than those treated with SLND (10.2% and 13.5%, respectively; RR =0.681; 95% CI, =0.521-0.888; P=0.005).

Conclusions

L-SLND yielded a significantly lower risk of morbidity compared to SLND without compromising long-term oncologic outcomes based on available studies with relatively poor quality. L-SLND may serve as an alternative to SLND in treating early-stage NSCLC. Further well-conducted RCTs, however, are badly needed to confirm and update our conclusions.