Combination bleomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin chemotherapy in cervical cancer

Systemic therapy for advanced cervical cancer: Leveraging the historical threshold of overall survival

Cervical cancer (CC) is a worldwide problem, especially in low- and middle-income countries, where patients are often diagnosed with locally advanced disease. Until recently, all chemotherapy drugs achieved low ORR and 12-month overall survival (12- month OS) for advanced CC after failure for platinum compounds. Advances in systemic therapy with immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) have leveraged the 12-month OS limit. Recently, immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) has become the standard of care in first-line advanced CC combined with platinum and taxane and in second-line after platinum doublet failure.

Review of the Standard and Advanced Screening, Staging Systems and Treatment Modalities for Cervical Cancer

Simple Summary

This review discusses the timeline and development of the recommended screening tests, diagnosis system, and therapeutics implemented in clinics for precancer and cancer of the uterine cervix. The incorporation of the latest automation, machine learning modules, and state-of-the-art technologies into these aspects are also discussed.

Abstract

Cancer arising from the uterine cervix is the fourth most common cause of cancer death among women worldwide. Almost 90% of cervical cancer mortality has occurred in low- and middle-income countries. One of the major aetiologies contributing to cervical cancer is the persistent infection by the cancer-causing types of the human papillomavirus. The disease is preventable if the premalignant lesion is detected early and managed effectively. In this review, we outlined the standard guidelines that have been introduced and implemented worldwide for decades, including the cytology, the HPV detection and genotyping, and the immunostaining of surrogate markers. In addition, the staging system used to classify the premalignancy and malignancy of the uterine cervix, as well as the safety and efficacy of the various treatment modalities in clinical trials for cervical cancers, are also discussed. In this millennial world, the advancements in computer-aided technology, including robotic modules and artificial intelligence (AI), are also incorporated into the screening, diagnostic, and treatment platforms. These innovations reduce the dependence on specialists and technologists, as well as the work burden and time incurred for sample processing. However, concerns over the practicality of these advancements remain, due to the high cost, lack of flexibility, and the judgment of a trained professional that is currently not replaceable by a machine.

Therapeutic applications and biological activities of bacterial bioactive extracts

Bacteria are rich in a wide variety of secondary metabolites, such as pigments, alkaloids, antibiotics, and others. These bioactive microbial products serve a great application in human and animal health. Their molecular diversity allows these natural products to possess several therapeutic attributes and biological functions. That's why the current natural drug industry focuses on uncovering all the possible ailments and diseases that could be combated by bacterial extracts and their secondary metabolites. In this paper, we review the major utilizations of bacterial natural products for the treatment of cancer, inflammatory diseases, allergies, autoimmune diseases, infections and other diseases that threaten public health. We also elaborate on the identified biological activities of bacterial secondary metabolites including antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral and antioxidant activities all of which are essential nowadays with the emergence of drug-resistant microbial pathogens. Throughout this review, we discuss the possible mechanisms of actions in which bacterial-derived biologically active molecular entities could possess healing properties to inspire the development of new therapeutic agents in academia and industry.

Investigation into the Effect of Photodynamic Therapy and Cisplatin on the Cervical Cancer Cell Line (A2780)

Introduction: Cervical cancer is recognized as one of the major causes of mortality among elderly women. Although there are several different therapeutic worldwide guidelines, many researchers have focused on screening new methodologies and technologies to elevate the efficiency of cervical cancer treatment. The simultaneous use of photodynamic therapy (PDT) along with chemotherapy as cisplatin has achieved good aims in the treatment of cervical cancer. Methods: A2780 cells were treated with cisplatin, photodynamic progress (laser with methylene blue as a photosensitizer compound) and a combination of cisplatin and PDT. The lithic effect of the laser, methylene blue and their combination and the IC50 value of cisplatin were calculated for each group. The amount of malondialdehyde (MDA) as membrane lipid peroxidation product and released lactate dehydrogenase was measured in the medium. The toxicity of each agent was evaluated by the MTT technique. Results: The results show that a combination of PDT and chemotherapeutic agent cisplatin caused a twofold decrease in viable cervical cancer cells compared to each therapeutic progress. The combination of both laser therapy and cisplatin enhanced cancer cell membrane disruption by increased membrane lipid peroxidation and apoptotic enzyme activation by the elevation of lactate dehydrogenase activity. Conclusion: The results indicated that cisplatin combined with PDT had a greater therapeutic effect on A2780 as a cervical cancer cell line. Therefore, PDT in combination with chemotherapy enhances the effectiveness of chemotherapeutic agents by the disruption of the cancer cell membrane and switching the apoptosis progress with less adverse effects.

Antioxidant and antiproliferative effects of different solvent fractions from Terminalia belerica Roxb. fruit on various cancer cells

Terminalia belerica Roxb. fruits have been previously reported against diabetes, ulcer, microbial problems and hepatotoxicity. The present study was aimed to investigate antioxidant and anticancer potential of sequentially fractionated hexane (TBHE), chloroform (TBCE), ethyl acetate (TBEE), butanol (TBBE) and water (TBWE) extracts from the 70% methanolic extract of T. belerica fruits. TBCE, TBEE, TBBE and TBWE showed excellent ROS (reactive oxygen species) and RNS (reactive nitrogen species) scavenging activities which was investigated using 11 different assays for various free radicals. Among 5 fractions, TBHE and TBCE remained nontoxic to any of the malignant cell lines including normal cells (WI-38). TBBE and TBWE inhibited the proliferation of breast (MCF-7), cervical (HeLa) and brain (U87) cancer cells by inducing G2/M arrest while TBEE caused apoptosis. However, these fractions did not inhibit the proliferation of lung (A549) and liver (HepG2) cancer cells. BrdU incorporation study also suggested the efficient anticancer potential of TBEE, TBBE and TBWE. Moreover, TBBE and TBWE treated MCF-7, HeLa and U87 cells showed upregulation of p53 and p21 proteins. Phytochemical analysis reflected the presence of adequate quantities of different phytochemicals. Moreover, HPLC analysis show peaks of purpurin, catechin, tannic acid, reserpine, ellagic acid, methyl gallate, aconitine and rutin in TBBE, TBWE and TBEE. Hence these polar extracts of T. belerica can be used to develop drug against different types of cancer.

Pharmacotherapy of cervical cancer

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Cervical cancer (CC) remains an important health problem. It is the second most frequent malignancy in women worldwide, with one-third of patients dying from pharmacoresistant disease.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

We reviewed pharmacotherapy approaches in the medical and multidisciplinary management of CC and conducted a systematic search of Pubmed for clinical trials, reviews and meta-analysis published in the last 20 years. Abstracts of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, European Society of Gynecological Oncology and International Gynecologic Cancer Society were also searched, together with the US National Institutes of Health clinical trial database.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

The state-of-the art of cytotoxic and biologically targeted therapies in early, locally advanced and metastatic/recurrent CC is discussed.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Until recently, the role of pharmacotherapy in CC was restricted to palliation of advanced/metastatic or recurrent disease. During the past two decades, this reluctant attitude towards chemotherapy has been modified after a series of randomized trials demonstrated its beneficial contribution as an adjunct to radiotherapy or surgery in early and locally advanced CC. Moreover, new combinations of cytotoxics, together with novel molecular target agents, open new perspectives in the treatment of primary and recurrent CC.

Chemotherapy for recurrent cervical cancer

PURPOSE

Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer of women worldwide and one of the leading cause of death in relative young women. This review gives an outline of chemotherapy of advanced, persistent or recurrent cervical cancer.

METHODS

We performed a literature search in the PubMed of almost all relevant articles concerning chemotherapy of advanced, persistent or recurrent cervical cancer.

RESULTS

The available data from the literature is mainly composed of most recent reviews, phase II and randomized phase III clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

Single-agent cisplatin remains the current standard therapy for advanced, persistent or recurrent cervical cancer. Several single-agents have been tested, but none has been found to be superior compared to cisplatin. Both topotecan and paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin, have yielded superior response rates and progression-free survival without diminishing patient quality of life. However, only the combination of cisplatin and topotecan has improved overall survival. It is important to identify clinical and tumor-related factors predictive of response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Future trials are necessary, not only to compare combinations of existing agents, but to incorporate biological agents (monoclonal antibodies or small molecules) to chemotherapy in order to improve the treatment results of advanced, persistent or recurrent cervix cancer.

The Gynecologic Oncology Group's role in the treatment of recurrent cervix cancer: current clinical trials

The Gynecologic Oncology Group's role in developing and evaluating vital research hypotheses for women with cancer of the uterine cervix cannot be understated, as methodical and interpretable conclusions from its many clinical studies have defined, supported and driven the standard of care in several avenues of clinical care. The focus of this presentation was to review for an international audience the principle structure, underlying hypotheses and historical progress in the investigation of chemotherapy options for women identified with recurrent cervix cancer. While the impact of phase II research queues were presented, the primary focus was to review the pivotal randomized trial which now define practice standards for these women.

Chemotherapy for recurrent cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

To give an overview of chemotherapy schemes used in recurrent cervical cancer.

METHODS

A pubmed search was performed using chemotherapy and recurrent cervical cancer including articles until April 2007.

RESULTS

Most recent articles and articles of interest are discussed.

CONCLUSION

Single agent cisplatin (50 mg/m2) remains the current standard for recurrent cervical cancer. Numerous chemotherapeutic agents have been tested but did not show convincing evidence of improved survival rates, except for the GOG 179 study which showed an improved survival for the combination of cisplatin and topotecan compared with single agent cisplatin. However, nearly 60% of patients in both groups received prior cisplatinum therapy as a radiosensitizer, which could be responsible for the development of platinum resistance, causing lower response and survival rates in the single platinum group. Hence, the apparent benefit in the doublet group is maybe just a reflection from the change in primary therapy and patient population. It is hoped that current trials comparing standard therapy with other single or doublet chemotherapeutic regimens or that the use of molecular-targeted agents will give us promising therapeutic options in the future.

Management of metastatic cervical cancer: review of the literature

This article reviews the English-language literature concerning chemotherapy for advanced, recurrent, or metastatic cervix carcinoma. Specifically, it reviews the available literature for active single agents, doublets, triplets, and multiple drug combination chemotherapy. Until recently, single-agent cisplatin was the drug of choice in metastatic cervix cancer. Various doublets, triplets, and quartlets have been reported to have higher objective response rates than single-agent cisplatin when compared in phase III clinical trials. Some have demonstrated improvements in progression-free survival, but only topotecan plus cisplatin has demonstrated an improvement in overall survival. This benefit is most apparent in patients who have a long disease-free interval from primary therapy and who have not received prior cisplatin as a radiosensitizer.

Gynecologic oncology group trials of chemotherapy for metastatic and recurrent cervical cancer

Because only 16% of patients with metastatic cervical cancer are alive 5 years after diagnosis, the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) has carefully designed and conducted many phase II studies to identify promising drugs. Cisplatin has emerged as the most active single agent with overall response rates of 19%. Recent phase III trials have documented response rates of 27% and 39% when cisplatin has been combined with either paclitaxel or topotecan, respectively. The comparison of cisplatin to cisplatin plus topotecan in GOG-179 has yielded the first study to show a statistically significant impact on the overall response rate, median progression-free survival, and median survival, with all outcome measures favoring the two-drug regimen. Despite these encouraging results, however, most of the responses are partial and of short duration. The need for novel combinations and the implementation of active biologic agents is implicit. The accumulated data in this disease setting, as evidenced by the experience of the GOG, are presented in this review.

Randomized phase III trial of cisplatin with or without topotecan in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

PURPOSE

On the basis of reported activity of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) or topotecan plus cisplatin in advanced cervix cancer, we undertook a randomized trial comparing these combinations versus cisplatin alone, to determine whether survival is improved with either combination compared with cisplatin alone, and to compare toxicities and quality of life (QOL) among the regimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks (CPT); cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) day 1 plus topotecan 0.75 mg/m(2) days 1 to 3 every 3 weeks (CT); or methotrexate 30 mg/m(2) days 1, 15, and 22, vinblastine 3 mg/m(2) days 2, 15, and 22, doxorubicin 30 mg/m(2) day 2, and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) day 2 every 4 weeks (MVAC). Survival was the primary end point; response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) were secondary end points. QOL data are reported separately.

RESULTS

The MVAC arm was closed by the Data Safety Monitoring Board after four treatment-related deaths occurred among 63 patients, and is not included in this analysis. Two hundred ninety-four patients enrolled onto the remaining regimens: 146 to CPT and 147 to CT. Grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity was more common with CT. Patients receiving CT had statistically superior outcomes to those receiving CPT, with median overall survival of 9.4 and 6.5 months (P = .017), median PFS of 4.6 and 2.9 months (P = .014), and response rates of 27% and 13%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This is the first randomized phase III trial to demonstrate a survival advantage for combination chemotherapy over cisplatin alone in advanced cervix cancer.

Phase II study of irinotecan combined with mitomycin-C for advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: the JGOG study

OBJECTIVES

The efficacy and toxicity of combined therapy with irinotecan (CPT-11) plus mitomycin-C (MMC) were evaluated in patients with advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the uterine cervix.

METHODS

CPT-11 (100 mg/m(2)) was administered on days 1, 8, and 15 by intravenous (iv) infusion over 90 min, while MMC (10 mg/m(2) iv) was given on day 1. This regimen was repeated every 28 days and at least two courses were given.

RESULTS

Among 51 eligible patients (median age: 52 years; range: 25-72 years), 2 showed complete response (CR) and 24 showed PR, for an overall response rate (ORR) of 51.0% (95% confidence interval: 36.6-65.3%). In patients without prior chemotherapy, the ORR was 54.8% (38.7-70.2%). Twenty-five patients (Ib2:3, IIb:17, and IIIb:5) received this regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy and their ORR was 76% (54.9-90.6%). Twenty-two patients were able to undergo radical surgery after NAC. The major toxicity was neutropenia, which was grade 3-4 in 59% of the patients. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia and anemia were also seen in 26% of the patients each. The most common nonhematologic toxicity was diarrhea (grade 3-4 in 12%).

CONCLUSION

CPT-11 combined with MMC can be effective against advanced or recurrent SCC of the uterine cervix.

Phase I-II study of irinotecan (CPT-11) plus nedaplatin (254-S) with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer

Combination chemotherapy with irinotecan (CPT-11) and platinum compounds is effective for treating cervical cancer. Nedaplatin (254-S) is a new cisplatin analogue that achieves a high response rate (53%) in patients with primary cervical cancer. We performed a phase I-II study of combination chemotherapy with CPT-11 plus 254-S for advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. The inclusion criteria were stage IV disease or recurrence. CPT-11 and 254-S were administered intravenously on day 1, while rhG-CSF (50 microg) was given on days 3-12. This regimen was repeated after 4 weeks. Dose escalation was carried out in tandem (CPT-11/254-S: 50/70, 50/80, and 60/80 mg m(-2)). A total of 27 patients (stage IV=seven, recurrence=20) were enrolled. The phase I study enrolled eight patients. At dose levels 1 and 2, no dose-limiting toxicities were observed. At dose level 3, the first two patients developed DLTs. The maximum tolerated dose of CPT-11 and 254-S was 60 and 80 mg m(-2), respectively, and the recommended doses were 50 and 80 mg m(-2). Grade 3/4 haematologic toxicity occurred in 67% in phase II study, but there were no grade 3 non-haematologic toxicities except for nausea or lethargy. In all 27 patients, there were two complete responses (7%) and 14 Partial responses (52%), for an overall response rate of 59% (95% confidence interval: 39-78%). Among the 12 responders with recurrent disease, the median time to progression and median survival were 161 days (range: 61-711 days) and 415 days (range: 74-801 days). This new regimen is promising for cervical cancer.

The role of chemotherapy in the management of carcinoma of the cervix

Carcinoma of the cervix remains the most common form of cancer to affect women worldwide despite effective screening techniques. Advances in treatment, particularly systemic therapies, have improved outcomes for cervical cancer. This article examines the role of chemotherapy, particularly in those patients with disseminated disease and those with locally advanced disease in the pelvis.

Retrospective Analysis of Concurrent Chemoradiation with the Combination of Bleomycin, Ifosfamide and Cisplatin (BIP) for Uterine Cervical Cancer

Combination chemotherapy consisting of bleomycin, ifosfamide, and ciplatin (BIP) is recognized as one of the most effective chemotherapies for uterine cervical cancer. However, there have been no reports that evaluate concurrent use of radiation with BIP. The objective of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and response of the combination of BIP concurrent with radiation in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Eligibility criteria included patients who underwent radical hysterectomy (Type III hysterectomy) as a primary treatment and revealed lymph node metastases or deep myometrial invasion (stage IB and IIA) and patients who were previously untreated (stage IIB-IV). All of the patients had biopsy-proven squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. The patients received three courses of BIP chemoradiation, and the response and toxicity were evaluated. From January 2000 to December 2003, 30 patients met study eligibility criteria. All but three patients completed 3 courses of planned chemotherapy. The frequency of severe (grade 3 and 4) toxicity was as follows: anemia, 46.7%; neutrocytopenia, 73.3%; thrombocytopenia, 16.7%; and nausea and vomiting, 23.3%. Among 30 patients, 22 cases were evaluated for response. Complete response was achieved in 16 (72.7%) of patients, with a response rate of 90.9%. In conclusion, BIP chemoradiation seems to be superior to previously reported chemoradiation regimens, and has a potential as an optimal combination chemotherapy concurrent with radiation.

Role of systemic chemotherapy in metastatic cervical cancer

Cervical cancer is a chemoresponsive tumor. Concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin and radiotherapy has resulted in improved survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer and is now standard of care. There are many active drugs in metastatic cervical cancer with cisplatin being the most active single agent. Although response rates are significantly higher with cisplatin combinations, to date, there is no evidence to suggest this is associated with an improved survival. However, this is still an area that is attracting much research interest. The role of chemotherapy in metastatic cervical cancer will be reviewed together with some of the new areas of research.

Phase II trial of cisplatin plus decitabine, a new DNA hypomethylating agent, in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix

On the basis of the demonstrated single-agent activity of cisplatin in patients with advanced cervical cancer and the observation of in vitro synergism between this agent and decitabine, a new DNA hypomethylating agent, we designed a phase II trial in which the combined use of the two agents are used as first-line therapy in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic disease. Eligible patients were those with histopathologically proven diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix, which was not considered suitable for curative surgery and/or irradiation, having measurable disease, leukocyte counts more than or equal to 4,000/microl, thrombocyte counts more than or equal to 100,000/microl, serum creatinine more than or equal to 1.5 mg/dl, and normal liver function tests. Initial dose of cisplatin was 40 mg/m(2), whereas decitabine was 50 mg/m(2) for 3 consecutive days every 21 days. Because of toxicity, the dose of cisplatin was reduced to 30 mg/m(2). Twenty-five patients were included in the study; 24 of them were eligible for the evaluation of toxicity, whereas 21 of them were eligible for the evaluation of tumor responses. Nineteen (79.2%) patients had received prior radiotherapy. A total of 75 cycles of chemotherapy were administered to the patients, with a median of 3 cycles (range: 1-8) per patient. The most frequently observed side effect was neutropenia, which was National Cancer Institute- Common Toxicity Criteria grades III and IV in 68.0% of cases. One patient died of complications caused by drug-related neutropenic sepsis. The most common nonhematologic grades III and IV toxicities were nausea and vomiting, which occurred in 17.3% and 9.3% of the cycles, respectively. Of a total of 21 patients evaluable for tumor response, 8 (38.1%) achieved a partial response, whereas stable disease was documented in 5 cases (23.8%). Median progression-free interval (PFI) was 16 weeks, and median survival was 19 weeks (95% CI 7.9-31.2). Objective responses were more frequent in patients with metastatic lesions in nonirradiated sites. Cisplatin- decitabine combination was moderately active in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix, mainly in patients presenting with metastatic disease at previously nonirradiated sites. However, this regimen produced significant hematologic toxicity. Further studies with this combination including a larger patient population, preferably with the concomitant administration of hematopoietic growth factors, are warranted.

Combination of ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin for the treatment of metastatic and recurrent carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a phase II study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group

OBJECTIVE

Ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin have moderate single-agent activity in patients with metastatic or recurrent cancer of the uterine cervix. We administered a combination of these three agents to a large number of patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer to evaluate its activity.

METHODS

Sixty patients were treated on an outpatient basis with Ifosfamide (I) 1500 mg/m(2) intravenously over 1 h on Days 1-3, paclitaxel (T) 175 mg/m(2) as a 3-h intravenous infusion on Day 1, and cisplatin (P) 75 mg/m(2) intravenously over 2 h on Day 2 with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. The chemotherapy was repeated every 4 weeks for a maximum of six courses.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients received at least two courses of treatment and are evaluable for response. Twenty-six patients (46%) achieved an objective response, including 19% complete and 27% partial responses. The median duration of response was 11.5 months and the median time to progression and survival for all patients were 8.3 and 18.6 months, respectively. Patients with excellent performance status, with disease recurrence outside the radiation field, and with nonsquamous tumors had the highest response rate and best survival. Some degree of neurotoxicity occurred in 44% of patients. Grade 3 or 4 toxicity included granulocytopenia in 26% of patients, anemia in 13%, thrombocytopenia in 7%, and neurotoxicity in 3%.

CONCLUSION

The ITP regimen is relatively well tolerated and moderately active in patients with metastatic carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Patients more likely to benefit are those with nonsquamous histology, with excellent performance status, and with disease recurrence outside the radiation field.

Multimodal therapy including neoadjuvant methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) for stage IIB to IV cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the survival rates and toxicity levels that are associated with multimodal therapy (including neoadjuvant methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin [MVAC]) in patients with stage IIB to IVB cervical cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 49 patients who were treated between 1989 and 1997 with neoadjuvant MVAC for advanced cervical cancer.

RESULTS

The clinical response rate was 90% (27 partial responders, 17 complete responders). Grade 3 or greater toxicity was mostly limited to neutropenia; no deaths were attributed to MVAC. Combined therapy after MVAC included operation in 34 patients (69%) and radiation in 41 patients (84%). Twenty-one patients (43%) had <2 cm residual tumor at histologic evaluation. Pelvic control was achieved in 86% of patients. Five-year disease-specific survival for patients with stage III disease was 60%.

CONCLUSION

For patients with advanced cervical cancer, neoadjuvant MVAC had a high response rate (90%) and an acceptable toxicity level. Compared with historic control subjects, multimodal treatment may be associated with improved rates of pelvic control.

Randomized trial of cisplatin and ifosfamide with or without bleomycin in squamous carcinoma of the cervix: a gynecologic oncology group study

PURPOSE

Phase II trial reports have suggested that the addition of bleomycin to the combination of cisplatin and ifosfamide may improve response rates and possible survival in squamous carcinoma of the cervix. This study prospectively evaluates the combination of bleomycin to this regimen in women with histologically proven advanced recurrent or persistent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible women were randomized to receive either cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)), ifosfamide (5 g/m(2) over 24 hours), and mesna (6 g/m(2) during ifosfamide infusion and the following 12 hours) (CI) versus bleomycin 30 units over 24 hours on day 1 followed by cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)), ifosfamide (5 g/m(2) over 24 hours), and mesna (6 g/m(2) during ifosfamide infusion and the following 12 hours) (CIB). Three hundred three women were enrolled onto this trial, of which 287 were assessable.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between CI and CIB with regard to response rates (32% v 31.2%, respectively), progression-free survival (PFS), or overall survival. PFS and survival were associated with initial performance status (PS). Patients with a PS of 0 experienced a lower rate of failure (P =.013) and a lower risk of death (P =.009) compared with patients with PS of 2. The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities were leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and nausea and vomiting. Neither regimen was associated with a significant increase in incidence of these toxicities.

CONCLUSION

The CI regimen was virtually identical to CIB with regard to response rate, PFS, survival, and toxicity profile. Thus, the addition of bleomycin in the dose-schedule employed to cisplatin and ifosfamide did not improve outcome in patients with advanced cervical cancer.

Randomized phase III trial of bleomycin, vindesine, mitomycin-C, and cisplatin (BEMP) versus cisplatin (P) in disseminated squamous-cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: an EORTC Gynecological Cancer Cooperative Group study

PURPOSE

Three previous mitomycin-cisplatin-based chemotherapy trials conducted within the EORTC Gynecological Cancer Cooperative Group (GCCG) in patients with disseminated squamous-cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix (SCCUC) suggested that with such regimens a higher overall response rate and a higher complete response rate could be obtained compared to what might have been expected from cisplatin alone. In that respect the combination of bleomycin, vindesine (Eldesine), mitomycin C and cisplatin (BEMP) was the most promising. In the present study BEMP has been compared with the best single agent, cisplatin (P) in the expectation that improved response rates might translate into a better survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were those with SCCUC and disseminated measurable disease outside previously irradiated areas, aged < or = 75 years, with a WHO performance status < or = 2 and adequate bone marrow, renal, hepatic and pulmonary function, who gave consent according to regulations followed in individual institutions. Patients were randomized to BEMP: E 3 mg/m2 day 1, P 50 mg/m2 day 1, B 15 mg (24-hour infusion) day 2-4 and M 8 mg/m2 (at alternate cycles), or P 50 mg/m2. The first four cycles were given every 3 weeks (induction phase). Subsequent cycles were given every four weeks (maintenance phase), during which B was deleted from BEMP (MEP). Patients failing on P could be treated with BEM. Of the 287 patients entered, 235 were eligible and 201 evaluable for response.

RESULTS

BEMP induced a significantly higher response rate than P (42% vs. 25%, P = 0.006). There was no difference in complete response rate (11% vs. 7%). BEMP was significantly more toxic than P (+/- BEM), both with respect to hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities. After a median follow-up of 6.1 years, survival curves were not significantly different. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.3 and 10.1 months with BEMP and 4.5 and 9.3 months with P (+/- BEM), respectively. In a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for survival, a lower age (P = 0.003), a lower performance status (P = 0.0001) and a short (<1 year) interval since diagnosis (P = 0.0152) were all associated with an increased risk of dying. For progression-free survival, lower age, prior radiotherapy, locoregional involvement and no prior surgery were associated with a high risk. Treatment with BEMP or P had no significant impact on survival, but for progression-free survival there was a trend in favor of BEMP (P = 0.0893). Adjusting for prognostic factors did not change the effect of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination chemotherapy with BEMP produces more toxicity and more responses compared with cisplatin alone in patients with disseminated SCCUC, but this does not translate into a better survival. Therefore, in the palliative setting single-agent cisplatin should remain the standard therapy for these patients.

Chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent carcinoma of the cervix

The management of early-stage cervical cancer involves primarily surgery and/or chemoradiotherapy. When the disease spreads beyond the cervix but remains confined to the pelvis and draining lymph node basins, the mainstay of management is chemoradiotherapy. The use of primary systemic chemotherapy is related to the management of disease that has recurred or spread beyond the pelvic radiation fields. Although the optimal chemotherapy regimen remains to be determined, current protocols and the associated research to support their use are discussed in this review. Additionally, the rationale for use of chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced disease is presented.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with ifosfamide, cisplatin, and vinorelbine in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix

A phase II trial was performed to assess the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of ifosfamide (IFX), cisplatin (CDDP), and vinorelbine (VNB) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for untreated advanced cervical carcinoma (ACC). Between October 1995 and February 1998, 40 patients were entered in this study. Their median age was 43 years (range: 23-74 years). International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages were: IIB, 23; IIIB, 13; and IVA, 4. Therapy consisted of: IFX 2,000 mg/m2 1-hour (H) IV infusion days 1 to 3; 2-mercaptoethanesulfonic acid sodium salt (mesna) 400 mg/m2 IV bolus H 0 and 4, and 800 mg/m2 by mouth H 8, days 1 to 3; VNB 25 mg/m2 20-minute IV infusion days 1 and 8; and CDDP 75 mg/m2 IV day 3. Cycles were repeated every 28 days for a total of three courses. Both staging and response (R) assessment were performed by a multidisciplinary team. An objective response (OR) was observed in 24 of 40 patients (60%; 95% confidence interval, 45-75%). Four patients achieved complete response (CR) (10%); 20 partial response (50%); 12 patients stable disease (30%); and 4 progressive disease (10%). Eight of 24 patients (33%) with OR underwent radical surgery, and histologic CRs were recorded in 2 of them. The remaining patients received definitive radiotherapy after NAC. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression. Leukopenia occurred in 32 patients (80%) and was grade III or IV in 14 patients (36%). Peripheral neuropathy occurred in 9 patients (22%), whereas myalgias occurred in 10 (25%). Constipation was observed in 9 patients (23%); emesis occurred in 35 patients (88%). There were no therapy-related deaths. These results indicate that IFX/CDDP/VNB is an active combination for ACC with moderate toxicity. Implementation of this regimen in a multimodal therapy protocol deserves further study.

A randomised, prospective, phase III clinical trial of primary bleomycin, ifosfamide and cisplatin (BIP) chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in inoperable cancer of the cervix

BACKGROUND

Phase II studies have shown primary (neo-adjuvant) chemotherapy with bleomycin, ifosfamide and cisplatin (BIP) is active against inoperable cervical cancer. We present here results of a randomised phase III multicentre trial comparing radical radiotherapy with neo-adjuvant BIP chemotherapy followed by radical radiotherapy in patients with inoperable cervical cancer, designed to discover whether this combination might improve survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with inoperable cervical carcinoma were randomised to pelvic radiotherapy alone [RT] or two to three cycles of bleomycin 30 units/24-hour infusion, ifosfamide 5 g/m2/24 hours, and cisplatin 50 mg/m2) chemotherapy followed by pelvic radiotherapy (BIP + RT). Randomisation was stratified by stage and radiotherapy centre.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-two eligible women were randomised into this trial; eighty-six to RT and eighty-six to BIP + RT. A total of 190 cycles of chemotherapy were given. Median follow-up for the 47 patients still alive is 9 years with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. Complete or partial response occurred in 51 of 86 (59%) of those randomised to RT and 60 of 86 (69%) of those randomised to BIP + RT. The difference between response rates does not reach statistical significance (chi2 = 2.06, P = 0.15). Median survival is two years with an actuarial survival at five years of 32% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 25%-39%). There is no significant difference between the treatment groups (chi2log-rank = 0.11, P = 0.74).

CONCLUSIONS

This study does not show any survival benefit from the use of neo-adjuvant BIP chemotherapy in advanced cervical cancer.

A phase II trial of mitomycin, ifosfamide and cisplatin in recurrent carcinoma of the cervix

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and the toxicity of mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin in patients with recurrent carcinoma of the cervix. Between July 1992 and March 1995, 20 patients with recurrent cervical cancer were enrolled in this study. No patients had received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease, except some were exposed to cisplatin as a radiosensitizer at the time of their diagnosis. Mitomycin-C 6 mg/m2, ifosfamide 3 g/m2, and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 were given intravenously every 3 weeks. All patients were assessible for response and toxicity, and none was lost to follow-up. All patients except one had squamous cell carcinoma. The overall response rate was 45% (2 complete remissions and 7 partial remissions). The mean response duration was 35 months, and the median survival from treatment for the whole group was 14 months. Fifteen percent of all cycles produced grade 3 or 4 myelosuppression, and the main nonhematologic toxicity was nausea and vomiting, which was reported in 11.5% of all cycles. One death occurred secondary to chemotherapy-induced septicemia. Three patients are still alive, two with a complete response and one with a partial response. In conclusion, mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin have a good activity in recurrent carcinoma of the cervix and are comparable to other combination chemotherapy.

Chemotherapy of advanced and recurrent cervical carcinoma

Chemotherapy is used primarily to treat advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. There are three major applications: primary therapy, as a radiation sensitizer, and neoadjuvant therapy. Primary chemotherapy is employed in advanced and disseminated cervical carcinoma (Stage VB). The four best single drugs with moderate activity against cervical cancer are: cisplatin, ifosfamide, dibromodulcitol (mitolactol), and Adriamycin (doxorubicin). Cisplatin and ifosfamide appear to be the best combination therapy: they provide an objective response rate of 33%. However, because the overall survival was not significantly improved with combination therapy, single-agent therapy with one of the above active drugs is acceptable. For stages IIB, III and IVA, the primary therapy is still radiation. Concomitant chemotherapy with hydroxyurea or a combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) have been shown to enhance radiation response in several randomized trials. Hydroxyurea is the preferred radiation sensitizer because it offers less toxicity, ease of administration, and equivalent results. Chemotherapy in neoadjuvant setting produces promising results. Various cisplatin combinations of mitomycin C, 5-FU, vincristine, and bleomycin have been employed to shrink locally advanced cervical cancer and permit safe, radical excision. Early results with these combinations in small trials are encouraging but further studies are needed to fully evaluate their potential.

Phase II study of cisplatin and vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix

PURPOSE

To evaluate the activity and toxicity of the combination of cisplatin (80 mg/m2 day 1) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m2 days 1 and 8) in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix that has not been previously treated with chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty patients with cervical cancer were enrolled onto this study (27 stage IB-III, 23 stage IVB-recurrent). A two-stage optimal Simon design was applied. Thirteen responders of 29 treated patients were required to proceed beyond the first stage, and 28 responders were needed overall.

RESULTS

Hematologic toxicity was mild, with neutropenia being the most frequent side effect. Nonhematologic toxicity was frequent but never severe; one patient had grade 3 peripheral neurotoxicity. Objective responses were recorded for 32 patients (64%): 11 patients (22%) achieved a complete response (CR) and 21 patients (42%) achieved a partial response (PR). The response rate was 81.5% in patients with IB-III stage (25.9% CR rate) and 43.5% in patients with IVB-recurrent disease (17.4% CR rate). Responses were seen both in stage IVB patients (one CR and two PRs, for an overall rate of 37.5%) and in patients with recurrent disease (three CRs + four PRs, for an overall rate of 46.7%).

CONCLUSION

The combination of cisplatin and vinorelbine is an active regimen in the treatment of patients with early-stage and advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix. The hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity of this combination is mild.

Phase II trial of paclitaxel and cisplatin in metastatic and recurrent carcinoma of the uterine cervix

PURPOSE

Both paclitaxel and cisplatin have moderate activity in patients with metastatic or recurrent cancer of the cervix, and the combination of these two agents has shown activity and possible synergism in a variety of solid tumors. We administered this combination to patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer to evaluate its activity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-four consecutive patients were treated on an outpatient basis with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 administered intravenously over a 3-hour period followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 administered intravenously with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. The chemotherapy was administered every 3 weeks for a maximum of six courses.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (47%; 95% confidence interval, 30% to 65%) achieved an objective response, including five complete responses and 11 partial responses. Responses occurred in 28% of patients with disease within the radiation field only and in 57% of patients with disease involving other sites. The median duration of response was 5.5 months, and the median times to progression and survival for all patients were 5 and 9 months, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities included anemia in 18% of patients and granulocytopenia in 15% of patients. Fifty-three percent of patients developed some degree of neurotoxicity; 21% of cases were grade 2 or worse.

CONCLUSION

The combination of paclitaxel with cisplatin seems relatively well tolerated and moderately active in patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer. The significant incidence of neurotoxicity is of concern, and alternative methods of administration of the two agents could be evaluated. Then, further study of this combination, alone or with the addition of other active agents, is warranted.

Palliative chemotherapy in recurrent carcinoma of the cervix: an audit of the use of ifosfamide and review of the literature

A review was conducted on 34 patients treated with intravenous ifosfamide for relapsed, inoperable carcinoma of the cervix between 1988 and 1996. The median age of patients was 44 years. Thirty-two patients had squamous cell carcinoma and 2 had adenocarcinoma. Radiotherapy had been used in primary management in 33, neo-adjuvant platinum chemotherapy in 7, and previous palliative chemotherapy in 11. Symptomatic response was assessed with respect to the symptom requiring palliaton. 25 patients failed to complete 6 cycles of chemotherapy: due to progressive disease in 14, lack of symptom response in 2, and toxicity in 11 of whom 7 had encephalopathy sufficient to abandon treatment. 32 patients were evaluable for objective response. Pathologic complete response (CR) was achieved in 1 patient, and partial response (PR) was achieved in 3 patients. The objective response rate was 11.8%. Symptomatic response throughout treatment occurred in 8 patients (24%); objective response was seen in only 3 (1 CR, 2 PR) of them and progressive disease in the remaining 5. Response duration in the 4 objective responders was 25 months in the patient with CR and 4, 6 and 8 weeks in the 3 patients with PR. In conclusion, ifosfamide, as given, is associated with unacceptable toxicity and insufficient symptomatic efficacy for use as a palliative treatment in patients with relapsed carcinoma of the cervix.

Single agent versus combination chemotherapy in recurrent cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

Cisplatin and ifosfamide are two most active agents in patients with recurrent and metastatic cervical cancer. Combination of bleomycin, ifosfamide and cisplatinum (BIP) was compared with cisplatinum alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and six patients with recurrent/persistent and metastatic cervical cancer received either a combination of bleomycin, ifosfamide and cisplatinum, (Group A, n = 50) or cisplatinum alone (Group B, n = 56) every 3 weeks for up to 6 courses. Ninety-seven patients were evaluable and were analysed for response and survival.

RESULTS

Patients receiving BIP (Group A) had a higher response rate (complete and partial responses), 52.2% vs 29.4%, p < 0.01 with overall median survival, 8 months (1 to 92+ months) vs 6 months (1 to 40+ months), p = 0.18. Chemotherapy responders had a significantly higher survival in both groups compared to the non-responders (Group A: 17 vs 6 months, p < 0.001, Group B: 20.5 months vs 5 months, p < 0.001). Patients in good performance status (ECOG, 0-2) had a significantly higher response rate to chemotherapy (Group A: 70.3% vs 26.3%, p < 0.01, Group B: 38.2% vs 11.7%, p < 0.05). In Group A, patients with extrapelvic disease responded better compared to pelvic disease (83.3% vs 34.5%, p < 0.01). Chemotherapy side effects were mainly nausea/vomiting, alopecia, myelosuppression, reversible encephalopathy (in Group A), and impaired renal functions. Chemotherapy toxicity was higher for patients receiving BIP, 2 patients died of BIP toxicity. Currently, in 'Group A' 8 patients are alive, 7 disease-free and one with disease at a median interval of 51 months after chemotherapy treatment. While in Group B, 3 patients are alive, 2 disease-free and one with disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Bleomycin, ifosfamide and cisplatin improved the response rate in recurrent and metastatic cervical cancer compared with cisplatinum alone. However, the toxicity was moderate and survival was not significantly improved. These results need to be confirmed in a phase III, randomized study in larger number of patients.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, ifosfamide and paclitaxel for locally advanced squamous-cell cervical cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly being used for the treatment of bulky and locally-advanced cervical cancer. Cisplatin and ifosfamide are known to be effective in cervical cancer, while paclitaxel is one of the promising new drugs for the treatment of this neoplasm.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the toxic effects and antitumor activity of a multidrug neoadjuvant regimen consisting of cisplatin, ifosfamide, and paclitaxel in bulky and locally advanced cervical cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight patients with pathology-confirmed squamous-cell cervical cancer (27 IB2-IIA, two IIB, eight IIIB, one IVA) were prospectively enrolled in the study. Their treatment consisted of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 given over three hours on day 1, cisplatin 50 mg/m2 (75 mg/m2 in 10 patients), ifosfamide 5 g/m2 in a 24-hour continuous infusion and mesna 5 g/m2 in a 24-hour continuous infusion on day 2, and mesna 3 g/m2 in a 24-hour continuous infusion on day 3. The course was repeated every three weeks for three courses and all of the patients, except those with disease progression or who were inoperable, were scheduled for radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.

RESULTS

All patients are evaluable for response. Eleven achieved clinical complete responses, 21 had partial responses, five had stable disease and one had progression of disease. Of 34 patients who underwent surgery, six (16%) had pathology-documented complete responses, seven (18%) had partial responses with only microscopic residual disease in the cervix, 19 had sub-optimal partial responses, and two had stable disease, for an overall response rate of 84% (95% confidence intervals (CI): 68.7%-94%). Grade 3-4 neutropenia was recorded for 27 (71%) patients, grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia for four (10.5%), and grade 2 peripheral neuropathy for two (2.5%). At a median follow-up of 16 months (range 7-22), 29 (76%) women are alive without recurrence, seven are alive with persistent/recurrent disease and two have died of their disease.

CONCLUSIONS

According to pathology examination, this regimen yields a 34% complete and optimal partial response rate with acceptable toxicity, and it should be prospectively compared to other regimens.

Phase II study of weekly 4'-epidoxorubicin in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the cervix: an EORTC Gynaecological Cancer Cooperative Group study

In this study 22 patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the cervix were treated with a weekly bolus injection of 4'-epidoxorubicin at a dose of 12 mg/m2. Seventeen patients had received prior radiotherapy, all patients were chemo-naive. Toxicity was generally absent or very mild. One patient had a complete response and 2 patients had a partial response, one was an unconfirmed partial response, giving a response rate of 14%. Six patients had stable disease. The median progression-free survival and overall survival was 2.8 months and 6.1 months, respectively. In conclusion, 4'-epidoxorubicin used at this dosage and schedule has minimal activity in metastatic adenocarcinoma of the cervix.

A phase II trial of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in the treatment of metastatic carcinoma of the uterine cervix

BACKGROUND

Patients with metastatic carcinoma of the uterine cervix have limited survival. Thus, new chemotherapeutic agents and combinations are needed to improve patient outcome.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with Stage IV primary or recurrent carcinoma of the uterine cervix were assigned to chemotherapy treatment at 4-week intervals with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC). The treatment was comprised of methotrexate, 30 mg/m2 administered intravenously (i.v.) on Days 1, 15, and 22; vinblastine, 3 mg/m2 i.v. on Days 2, 15, and 22; doxorubicin, 30 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 2; and cisplatin, 70 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 2. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was given subcutaneously on Days 6-10 at a dose of 5 micrograms/kg.

RESULTS

After a median of 4 cycles (a maximum of 6 in responders), the authors observed objective responses in 14 patients (52%), including 3 complete responses (11%) and 11 partial responses (41%). Median overall survival was 11 months (range, 4-15+ months), and median progression free survival of the responders was 8 months (range, 6-15+ months). Toxicity was acceptable and included neutropenia, alopecia, vomiting, and stomatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

MVAC is an active regimen in the treatment of patients with advanced or recurrent carcinoma of the uterine cervix. It produced responses in one-half of the patients in this study, and it can be administered on an outpatient basis. The addition of G-CSF appears to reduce hematologic toxicity.

The addition of bleomycin and dose-escalated ifosfamide to the combination of cisplatin plus ifosfamide does not improve survival in advanced or recurrent cervical carcinoma

Twenty patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer were treated with bleomycin 30 U, ifosfamide 5 g/m2, and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 (BIP) every 28 days in a phase II trial. The primary purpose of this study was to compare response rate, survival, and toxicity of this regimen with results obtained in a similar group of patients treated with cisplatin 1 mg/kg per week for six courses followed by cisplatin, 20 mg/m2, plus ifosfamide 1.2 g/m2 daily for 3 days every 28 days. Four of 17 evaluable patients (23.5%) treated with BIP demonstrated a response to therapy (complete response 11.7%; partial response 11.7%). The median duration of response was 8.5+ months (range, 6+ to 24 months). These data do not differ significantly (P = 0.76) from a response rate of 27.5% among patients treated with cisplatin plus ifosfamide (PI). A significant (P = 0.003) increase in myelotoxicity was observed among patients treated with BIP versus those treated with PI. The median survival of patients treated with BIP of 13.5+ months (range, 8+ to 24 months) does not differ significantly from the median survival of 9+ months (3 to 26+ months) among patients treated with PI. The addition of bleomycin and dose-escalated ifosfamide did not significantly improve response rate or survival among patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer and resulted in a significant increase in myelotoxicity.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer--where does it stand?: a review

Platinum-based combination chemotherapy has been utilized in the neoadjuvant setting in locally advanced inoperable cervical cancer with the aim of improving response and survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be followed by either radiation therapy (RT) or by surgery in cases in which it seems to be appropriate. Available data indicate that preradiation chemotherapy yields no survival advantage over RT alone. However, presurgery chemotherapy may increase resectability in women with locally advanced cervical cancer to around 70 percent. Nonrandomized trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery have shown some improvement in the outcome. Prospective randomized trials are needed to evaluate this approach as compared with RT alone and to define its precise role in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Ifosfamide and cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced cervical carcinoma

A phase II trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of cisplatin (CDDP) and ifosfamide (IFX) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced cervical carcinoma (ACC). Between August 1991 and September 1993, 57 untreated patients with stages IIB to IVA were entered into this study. Median age was 44 years (range, 25 to 74 years). The distribution by stages (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) was as follows: IIB, 31 patients; IIIB, 21 patients; and IVA, 5 patients. Therapy consisted of IFX 2000 mg/m(2) 1-h i.v. infusion days 1 to 3; mesna 400 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus at hours 0 and 4, and 800 mg p.o. at hour 8; and CDDP 100 mg/m(2) on day 3. Cycles were repeated every 28 days for a total of three courses. Both staging and response assessment were performed by a multidisciplinary team. An objective response was observed in 30 of 56 patients (54%; 95% confidence interval, 41 to 67%). Four patients (7%) had a complete response (CR) and 26(46%) had a partial response (PR). Patients with CR or operable PR underwent surgery, otherwise received definitive radiotherapy. Toxicity was mild to moderate. There were no toxicity related deaths. These results indicate that IFX/CDDP is an active combination for ACC with mild toxicity. The results of phase III studies that evaluate the real impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy are awaited.

Chemotherapy rapidly alternating with accelerated radiotherapy for advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix

The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of treating patients with advanced cervical carcinoma using a regimen combining chemotherapy with intermittent hyperfractionated teletherapy. Eight patients with advanced cervical carcinoma were treated with bleomycin, ifosfamide and cisplatin, followed by a 5-day course of hyperfractionated external radiation. Three such courses were given at 21-day intervals. Treatment was completed using standard brachytherapy. Seven of the eight patients were evaluable for response; all obtained a complete response. Two patients developed recurrence (one in the pelvis and one distant) and died of disease. One patient died of treatment complications. The remaining four remain alive and free of disease 9-42 months after treatment. The simultaneous use of chemotherapy and intermittent hyperfractionated teletherapy is a promising strategy for the treatment of cervical carcinoma, resulting in a high rate of complete response.

Combination chemotherapy with 254-S, ifosfamide, and peplomycin for advanced or recurrent cervical cancer

BACKGROUND

Based on the fact that combination chemotherapy with cisplatin, ifosfamide, and bleomycin generated a 69% response rate in patients with recurrent cervical cancer; that 254-S (a cisplatin analogue) monotherapy generated a 46.3% response rate for cervical cancer, which was higher than those generated by cisplatin and carboplatin in historic comparison; and that peplomycin is a bleomycin analogue with improved pulmonary toxic effects, a combination regimen with 254-S, ifosfamide, and peplomycin was evaluated in an animal experiment and a clinical study in patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer with an expectation that the regimen might show a higher efficacy than 254-S monotherapy and the combination regimen including cisplatin.

METHODS

In the clinical testing, 254-S was administered intravenously (IV) at 80-100 mg/m2, ifosfamide was administered IV at 1500 mg/patient for 5 days, and peplomycin was administered intramuscularly at 5 mg/patient for 6 days. This treatment was repeated every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

As a result, this regimen showed additive or synergistic antitumor effects in mice receiving B16 melanoma transplants. In the clinical study, 83.8% and 60.9% response rates were obtained in 37 previously untreated patients with Stage III or IV cervical cancer and 23 with recurrent cervical cancer, respectively. The dose-limiting factor was bone marrow toxic effects, which were tolerable. The other toxic effects were mild, and there were no deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

From these results, this combination regimen was thought worthy of evaluation in a Phase III comparative study in patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer.

A phase II study of weekly cisplatin followed by cisplatin and ifosfamide in advanced or recurrent cervical carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Ifosfamide is an active agent in cisplatin-resistant cervical cancer. To determine the response rate of the combination of cisplatin and ifosfamide, a Phase II study was conducted of the administration of the combination after weekly cisplatin induction therapy.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients with advanced or recurrent cervical carcinoma were treated with 1 mg/kg of cisplatin weekly for six courses, followed by 20 mg/m2 of cisplatin and 1.2 g/m2 of ifosfamide daily for 3 days every 28 days.

RESULTS

Objective responses were seen in 11 of 40 (27.5%) assessable patients (complete response, 20%; partial response, 7.5%). The duration of response ranged from 3 months to 26+ months (median, 9+ months). All of the patients who responded to the cisplatin-ifosfamide combination initially responded to weekly cisplatin induction therapy. None of the four patients who had previously received chemotherapy responded. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxic effects occurred in 17 of 43 patients (39%). Neurologic and urologic toxic effects were infrequent. The current response rates are not better than the prior experience of the authors with other cisplatin combinations.

CONCLUSIONS

These results do not confirm the favorable reports of other authors with cisplatin-ifosfamide regimens in cervical carcinoma. The results of ongoing Phase III studies comparing cisplatin-ifosfamide with cisplatin alone in cervical carcinoma are awaited.

Phase II study of weekly 4'-epidoxorubicin in patients with metastatic squamous cell cancer of the cervix: an EORTC Gynaecological Cancer Cooperative Group Study

In this study 24 patients with metastatic cervical cancer were treated with a weekly bolus injection of 4'-epidoxorubicin at a dose of 12.5 mg/m2. All patients were followed until disease progression. Toxicity was generally absent or very mild. Only 1 patient (4%) had a partial remission lasting 23 weeks and 9 patients (38%) had stable disease with a median duration of 13 weeks (range 7-36). 4'-Epidoxorubicin at this dose and schedule is not active in metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.