1
|
Conrad K, Löber-Handwerker R, Hazaymeh M, Rohde V, Malinova V. Personalized prognosis stratification of newly diagnosed glioblastoma applying a statistical decision tree model. J Neurooncol 2024; 168:425-433. [PMID: 38639854 PMCID: PMC11186892 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04683-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most frequent glioma in adults with a high treatment resistance resulting into limited survival. The individual prognosis varies depending on individual prognostic factors, that must be considered while counseling patients with newly diagnosed GBM. The aim of this study was to elaborate a risk stratification algorithm based on reliable prognostic factors to facilitate a personalized prognosis estimation early on after diagnosis. METHODS A consecutive patient cohort with confirmed GBM treated between 2010 and 2021 was retrospectively analyzed. Clinical, radiological, and molecular parameters were assessed and included in the analysis. Overall survival (OS) was the primary outcome parameter. After identifying the strongest prognostic factors, a risk stratification algorithm was elaborated with estimated odds of survival. RESULTS A total of 462 GBM patients were analyzed. The strongest prognostic factors were Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), extent of tumor resection, and adjuvant treatment. Patients with CCI ≤ 1 receiving tumor resection had the highest survival odds (88% for 10 months). On the contrary, patients with CCI > 3 receiving no adjuvant treatment had the lowest survival odds (0% for 10 months). The 10-months survival rate in patients with CCI > 3 receiving adjuvant treatment was 56% for patients younger than 70 years and 22% for patients older than 70 years. CONCLUSION A risk stratification algorithm based on significant prognostic factors allowed a personalized early prognosis estimation at the time of GBM diagnosis, that can contribute to a more personalized patient counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Conrad
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Ronja Löber-Handwerker
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Mohammad Hazaymeh
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Veit Rohde
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Vesna Malinova
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mazarakis NK, Robinson SD, Sinha P, Koutsarnakis C, Komaitis S, Stranjalis G, Short SC, Chumas P, Giamas G. Management of glioblastoma in elderly patients: A review of the literature. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 46:100761. [PMID: 38500668 PMCID: PMC10945210 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
High grade gliomas are the most common primary aggressive brain tumours with a very poor prognosis and a median survival of less than 2 years. The standard management protocol of newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients involves surgery followed by radiotherapy, chemotherapy in the form of temozolomide and further adjuvant temozolomide. The recent advances in molecular profiling of high-grade gliomas have further enhanced our understanding of the disease. Although the management of glioblastoma is standardised in newly diagnosed adult patients there is a lot of debate regarding the best treatment approach for the newly diagnosed elderly glioblastoma patients. In this review article we attempt to summarise the findings regarding surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and their combination in order to offer the best possible management modality for this group of patients. Elderly patients 65-70 with an excellent functional level could be considered as candidates for the standards treatment consisting of surgery, standard radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide. Similarly, elderly patients above 70 with good functional status could receive the above with the exception of receiving a shorter course of radiotherapy instead of standard. In elderly GBM patients with poorer functional status and MGMT promoter methylation temozolomide chemotherapy can be considered. For elderly patients who cannot tolerate chemotherapy, hypofractionated radiotherapy is an option. In contrast to the younger adult patients, it seems that a careful individualised approach is a key element in deciding the best treatment options for this group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nektarios K. Mazarakis
- Royal Sussex County Hospital, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Eastern Rd, Brighton BN2 5BE, UK
- School of Medicine RCSI, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Stephen D. Robinson
- Royal Sussex County Hospital, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Eastern Rd, Brighton BN2 5BE, UK
- Department of Biochemistry and Biomedicine, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK
| | - Priyank Sinha
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, LS1 3EX, UK
| | | | - Spyridon Komaitis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Evaggelismos Hospital, Ipsilantou 45-47, Athens, Greece
| | - George Stranjalis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Evaggelismos Hospital, Ipsilantou 45-47, Athens, Greece
| | - Susan C. Short
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s Wellcome Trust Brenner Building St James’s University Hospital Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Paul Chumas
- School of Medicine RCSI, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Georgios Giamas
- Department of Biochemistry and Biomedicine, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Amanzadeh Jajin E, Oraee Yazdani S, Zali A, Esmaeili A. Efficacy and Safety of Vaccines After Conventional Treatments for Survival of Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Oncol Rev 2024; 18:1374513. [PMID: 38707486 PMCID: PMC11066223 DOI: 10.3389/or.2024.1374513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Malignant gliomas are known with poor prognosis and low rate of survival among brain tumors. Resection surgery is followed by chemotherapy and radiotherapy in treatment of gliomas which is known as the conventional treatment. However, this treatment method results in low survival rate. Vaccination has been suggested as a type of immunotherapy to increase survival rate of glioma patients. Different types of vaccines have been developed that are mainly classified in two groups including peptide vaccines and cell-based vaccines. However, there are still conflicts about which type of vaccines is more efficient for malignant glioma treatment. Methods Phase Ⅰ/Ⅱ clinical trials which compared the efficacy and safety of various vaccines with conventional treatments were searched in databases through November 2022. Overall survival (OS) rate, progression free survival (PFS), and OS duration were used for calculation of pooled risk ratio (RR). In addition, fatigue, headache, nausea, diarrhea, and flu-like syndrome were used for evaluating the safety of vaccines therapy in glioma patients. Results A total of twelve articles were included in the present meta-analysis. Comparison of OS rate between vaccinated groups and control groups who underwent only conventional treatments showed a significant increase in OS rate in vaccinated patients (I2 = 0%, RR = 11.17, 95% CI: 2.460-50.225). PFS rate was better in vaccinated glioma patients (I2 = 83%, RR = 2.87, 95% CI: 1.63-5.03). Assessment of safety demonstrated that skin reaction (I2 = 0.0%, RR = 3.654; 95% CI: 1.711-7.801, p-value = 0.0058) and flu-like syndrome were significantly more frequent adverse effects win vaccinated groups compared to the control group. Subgroup analysis also showed that vaccination leads to better OS duration in recurrent gliomas than primary gliomas, and in LGG than HGG (p-value = 0). On the other hand, personalized vaccines showed better OS duration than non-personalized vaccines (p-value = 0). Conclusion Vaccination is a type of immunotherapy which shows promising efficacy in treatment of malignant glioma patients in terms of OS, PFS and duration of survival. In addition, AFTV, peptide, and dendritic cell-based vaccines are among the most efficient vaccines for gliomas. Personalized vaccines also showed considerable efficacy for glioma treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Saeed Oraee Yazdani
- Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shohada Tajrish Comprehensive Neurosurgical Center of Excellence, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Alireza Zali
- Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shohada Tajrish Comprehensive Neurosurgical Center of Excellence, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Abolghasem Esmaeili
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hatiboglu MA, Akdur K, Sakarcan A, Seyithanoglu MH, Turk HM, Sinclair G, Oztanir MN. Promising outcome of patients with recurrent glioblastoma after Gamma Knife-based hypofractionated radiotherapy. Neurochirurgie 2024; 70:101532. [PMID: 38215936 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2024.101532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 12/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) in recurrent glioblastoma remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of GKRS in a group of patients with recurrent glioblastoma, focusing on survival and safety. METHODS Patients undergoing GKRS for recurrent glioblastoma between September 2014 and April 2019 were included in this study. Relevant clinical and radiosurgical data, including GKRS-related complications, were recorded and analyzed. Overall survival (OS), local progression free survival (LPFS) and prognostic factors for outcome were thoroughly evaluated. RESULTS Fifty-three patients were analyzed (24 female, 29 male). The median age was 50 years (range, 19-78 years). The median GKRS treatment volume was 35.01 cm3 (range, 2.38-115.57 cm3). Twenty patients (38%) were treated with single fraction GKRS, while 33 (62%) were treated with GKRS-based hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT). The median prescription dose for single fraction GKRS, 3-fractions HSRT and 5-fractions HSRT were 16 Gy (range, 10-20 Gy), 27 Gy (range, 18-33 Gy) and 25 Gy (range, 25-30 Gy), respectively. The median LPFS and OS times were 8.1 months and 11.4 months after GKRS, respectively. HSRT and Bevacizumab were associated with improved LPFS, while HSRT alone was associated with longer OS. CONCLUSION Our findings suggested that HRST would likely improve LPFS and OS in definite settings; the addition of Bevacizumab to GKRS was associated with increased rates of local control. No major complications were reported. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa Aziz Hatiboglu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bezmialem Vakif University Medical School, Vatan Street, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey; Beykoz Institute of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Bezmialem Vakif University, Yalıkoy Mahallesi, Beykoz, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Kerime Akdur
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bezmialem Vakif University Medical School, Vatan Street, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ayten Sakarcan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bezmialem Vakif University Medical School, Vatan Street, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Hakan Seyithanoglu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bezmialem Vakif University Medical School, Vatan Street, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Haci Mehmet Turk
- Department of Medical Oncology Bezmialem Vakif University Medical School, Vatan Street, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Georges Sinclair
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bezmialem Vakif University Medical School, Vatan Street, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Southampton, UK
| | - Mustafa Namik Oztanir
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bezmialem Vakif University Medical School, Vatan Street, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pan I, Huang RY. Artificial intelligence in neuroimaging of brain tumors: reality or still promise? Curr Opin Neurol 2023; 36:549-556. [PMID: 37973024 DOI: 10.1097/wco.0000000000001213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To provide an updated overview of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in neuro-oncologic imaging and discuss current barriers to wider clinical adoption. RECENT FINDINGS A wide variety of AI applications in neuro-oncologic imaging have been developed and researched, spanning tasks from pretreatment brain tumor classification and segmentation, preoperative planning, radiogenomics, prognostication and survival prediction, posttreatment surveillance, and differentiating between pseudoprogression and true disease progression. While earlier studies were largely based on data from a single institution, more recent studies have demonstrated that the performance of these algorithms are also effective on external data from other institutions. Nevertheless, most of these algorithms have yet to see widespread clinical adoption, given the lack of prospective studies demonstrating their efficacy and the logistical difficulties involved in clinical implementation. SUMMARY While there has been significant progress in AI and neuro-oncologic imaging, clinical utility remains to be demonstrated. The next wave of progress in this area will be driven by prospective studies measuring outcomes relevant to clinical practice and go beyond retrospective studies which primarily aim to demonstrate high performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Pan
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Baviskar Y, Likonda B, Pant S, Mokal S, Pawar A, Dasgupta A, Chatterjee A, Gupta T. Short-course Palliative Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Patients with Poor-prognosis High-grade Glioma: Survival and Quality of Life Outcomes from a Prospective Phase II Study. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:e573-e581. [PMID: 37455146 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To report longitudinal quality of life (QoL) outcomes and survival in patients with poor-prognosis high-grade glioma (HGG) treated with palliative hypofractionated radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with poor-prognosis HGG were accrued on a prospective study of short-course palliative hypofractionated radiotherapy (35 Gy/10 fractions/2 weeks). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL core questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and brain cancer module (BN20) were used in English or validated Indian vernacular languages (Hindi and Marathi) for QoL assessment at baseline (before radiotherapy), the conclusion of radiotherapy, 1 month post-radiotherapy and subsequently at 3-monthly intervals until disease progression/death. Baseline QoL scores were compared with corresponding scores from a historical HGG cohort. Summary QoL scores were compared longitudinally over time by related samples Friedman's two-way test. Progression-free survival and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and reported as 1-year estimates with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS Forty-nine (89%) of 55 patients completed the planned course of hypofractionated radiotherapy. Longitudinal QoL data were available in 42 (86%) of 49 patients completing radiotherapy, comprising the present cohort. The median age of included patients, comprised mainly of glioblastoma patients (81%), was 57 years, with an interquartile range (IQR) of 50-66 years and a median baseline Karnofsky score of 60 (IQR = 50-60). Baseline QoL scores were significantly worse for several domains compared with a historical institutional cohort of HGG patients treated previously with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy, indicating negative selection bias. QoL scores remained stable for most domains after palliative hypofractionated radiotherapy, with statistically significant improvements in fatigue (P = 0.032), dyspnoea (P = 0.042) and motor dysfunction (P = 0.036) over time. At a median follow-up of 8 months, Kaplan-Meier estimates of 1-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 33.3% (95% confidence interval 21.7-51.1%) and 38.1% (95% confidence interval 25.9-56%), respectively. CONCLUSION Short-course palliative hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients with poor-prognosis HGG is associated with stable and/or improved QoL scores in several domains, making it a viable resource-sparing regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Baviskar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH)/Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - B Likonda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH)/Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - S Pant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH)/Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - S Mokal
- Department of Clinical Research Secretariat, Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH)/Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - A Pawar
- Department of Clinical Research Secretariat, Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH)/Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - A Dasgupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH)/Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - A Chatterjee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH)/Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - T Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH)/Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Phillips KA, Kamson DO, Schiff D. Disease Assessments in Patients with Glioblastoma. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:1057-1069. [PMID: 37470973 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01440-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The neuro-oncology team faces a unique challenge when assessing treatment response in patients diagnosed with glioblastoma. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the standard imaging modality for measuring therapeutic response in both clinical practice and clinical trials. However, even for the neuroradiologist, MRI interpretations are not straightforward because of tumor heterogeneity, as evidenced by varying degrees of enhancement, infiltrating tumor patterns, cellular densities, and vasogenic edema. The situation is even more perplexing following therapy since treatment-related changes can mimic viable tumor. Additionally, antiangiogenic therapies can dramatically decrease contrast enhancement giving the false impression of decreasing tumor burden. Over the past few decades, several approaches have emerged to augment and improve visual interpretation of glioblastoma response to therapeutics. Herein, we summarize the state of the art for evaluating the response of glioblastoma to standard therapies and investigational agents as well as challenges and future directions for assessing treatment response in neuro-oncology. RECENT FINDINGS Monitoring glioblastoma responses to standard therapy and novel agents has been fraught with many challenges and limitations over the past decade. Excitingly, new promising methods are emerging to help address these challenges. Recently, the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group proposed an updated response criteria (RANO 2.0) for the evaluation of all grades of glial tumors regardless of IDH status or therapies being evaluated. In addition, advanced neuroimaging techniques, such as histogram analysis, parametric response maps, morphometric segmentation, radio pharmacodynamics approaches, and the integrating of amino acid radiotracers in the tumor evaluation algorithm may help resolve equivocal lesion interpretations without operative intervention. Moreover, the introduction of other techniques, such as liquid biopsy and artificial intelligence could complement conventional visual assessment of glioblastoma response to therapies. Neuro-oncology has evolved over the past decade and has achieved significant milestones, including the establishment of new standards of care, emerging therapeutic options, and novel clinical, translational, and basic research. More recently, the integration of histopathology with molecular features for tumor classification has marked an important paradigm shift in brain tumor diagnosis. In a similar manner, treatment response monitoring in neuro-oncology has made considerable progress. While most techniques are still in their inception, there is an emerging body of evidence for clinical application. Further research will be critically important for the development of impactful breakthroughs in this area of the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kester A Phillips
- The Ben and Catherine Ivy Center for Advanced Brain Tumor Treatment at Swedish Neuroscience Institute, 550 17Th Ave Suite 540, Seattle, WA, 98122, USA
| | - David O Kamson
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, 201 North Broadway, Skip Viragh Outpatient Cancer Building, 9Th Floor, Room 9177, Mailbox #3, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA
| | - David Schiff
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of Virginia Health System, 1300 Jefferson Park Avenue, West Complex, Room 6225, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kumar A, Jha AK, Agarwal JP, Yadav M, Badhe S, Sahay A, Epari S, Sahu A, Bhattacharya K, Chatterjee A, Ganeshan B, Rangarajan V, Moyiadi A, Gupta T, Goda JS. Machine-Learning-Based Radiomics for Classifying Glioma Grade from Magnetic Resonance Images of the Brain. J Pers Med 2023; 13:920. [PMID: 37373909 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13060920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Grading of gliomas is a piece of critical information related to prognosis and survival. Classifying glioma grade by semantic radiological features is subjective, requires multiple MRI sequences, is quite complex and clinically demanding, and can very often result in erroneous radiological diagnosis. We used a radiomics approach with machine learning classifiers to determine the grade of gliomas. Eighty-three patients with histopathologically proven gliomas underwent MRI of the brain. Whenever available, immunohistochemistry was additionally used to augment the histopathological diagnosis. Segmentation was performed manually on the T2W MR sequence using the TexRad texture analysis softwareTM, Version 3.10. Forty-two radiomics features, which included first-order features and shape features, were derived and compared between high-grade and low-grade gliomas. Features were selected by recursive feature elimination using a random forest algorithm method. The classification performance of the models was measured using accuracy, precision, recall, f1 score, and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve. A 10-fold cross-validation was adopted to separate the training and the test data. The selected features were used to build five classifier models: support vector machine, random forest, gradient boost, naive Bayes, and AdaBoost classifiers. The random forest model performed the best, achieving an AUC of 0.81, an accuracy of 0.83, f1 score of 0.88, a recall of 0.93, and a precision of 0.85 for the test cohort. The results suggest that machine-learning-based radiomics features extracted from multiparametric MRI images can provide a non-invasive method for predicting glioma grades preoperatively. In the present study, we extracted the radiomics features from a single cross-sectional image of the T2W MRI sequence and utilized these features to build a fairly robust model to classify low-grade gliomas from high-grade gliomas (grade 4 gliomas).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anuj Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhaba National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - Ashish Kumar Jha
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhaba National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - Jai Prakash Agarwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhaba National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - Manender Yadav
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhaba National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - Suvarna Badhe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhaba National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - Ayushi Sahay
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhaba National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - Sridhar Epari
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhaba National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - Arpita Sahu
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhaba National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - Kajari Bhattacharya
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhaba National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - Abhishek Chatterjee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhaba National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - Balaji Ganeshan
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Venkatesh Rangarajan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhaba National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - Aliasgar Moyiadi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhaba National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - Tejpal Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhaba National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - Jayant S Goda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhaba National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Blakstad H, Brekke J, Rahman MA, Arnesen VS, Miletic H, Brandal P, Lie SA, Chekenya M, Goplen D. Survival in a consecutive series of 467 glioblastoma patients: Association with prognostic factors and treatment at recurrence at two independent institutions. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0281166. [PMID: 36730349 PMCID: PMC9894455 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Therapy of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) is challenging due to lack of standard treatment. We investigated physicians' treatment choice at recurrence and prognostic and predictive factors for survival in GBM patients from Norway's two largest regional hospitals. Clinicopathological data from n = 467 patients treated at Haukeland and Oslo university hospitals from January 2015 to December 2017 was collected. Data included tumour location, promoter methylation of O6 methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) and mutation of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), patient age, sex, extent of resection at primary diagnosis and treatment at successive tumour recurrences. Cox-proportional hazards regression adjusting for multiple risk factors was used. Median overall survival (OS) was 12.1 months and 21.4% and 6.8% of patients were alive at 2 and 5 years, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 8.1 months. Treatment at recurrence varied but was not associated with difference in overall survival (OS) (p = 0.201). Age, MGMT hypermethylation, tumour location and extent of resection were independent prognostic factors. Patients who received 60 Gray radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide at primary diagnosis had 16.1 months median OS and 9.3% were alive at 5 years. Patients eligible for gamma knife/stereotactic radiosurgery alone or combined with chemotherapy at first recurrence had superior survival compared to chemotherapy alone (p<0.001). At second recurrence, combination chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab were both superior to no treatment. Treatment at recurrence differed between the institutions but there was no difference in median OS, indicating that it is the disease biology that dictates patient outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanne Blakstad
- Department of Oncology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jorunn Brekke
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Mohummad Aminur Rahman
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Institute for Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Victoria Smith Arnesen
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Institute for Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Hrvoje Miletic
- Institute for Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Petter Brandal
- Department of Oncology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stein Atle Lie
- Institute for Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Martha Chekenya
- Institute for Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- * E-mail:
| | - Dorota Goplen
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lehrer EJ, Kowalchuk RO, Gurewitz J, Bernstein K, Kondziolka D, Niranjan A, Wei Z, Lunsford LD, Fakhoury KR, Rusthoven CG, Mathieu D, Trudel C, Malouff TD, Ruiz-Garcia H, Bonney P, Hwang L, Yu C, Zada G, Patel S, Deibert CP, Picozzi P, Franzini A, Attuati L, Prasad RN, Raval RR, Palmer JD, Lee CC, Yang HC, Harmsen WS, Jones BM, Sharma S, Ahluwalia MS, Sheehan JP, Trifiletti DM. Concurrent Administration of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Single Fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Melanoma, and Renal Cell Carcinoma Brain Metastases is Not Associated With an Increased Risk of Radiation Necrosis Over Nonconcurrent Treatment: An International Multicenter Study of 657 Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023:S0360-3016(23)00057-3. [PMID: 36690161 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are highly effective treatments for brain metastases, particularly when these therapies are administered concurrently. However, there are limited data reporting the risk of radiation necrosis (RN) in this setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with brain metastases from primary non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, or melanoma treated with SRS and ICI were considered. Time-to-event analyses were conducted for any grade RN and symptomatic RN (SRN) with death incorporated as a competing risk. As a secondary analysis, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used for model development, and a loop of potential models was analyzed, with the highest-fidelity model selected. Brain V12 Gy thresholds identified on RPA were then incorporated into the competing risks analysis. Concurrent SRS and ICI administration. RESULTS Six hundred fifty-seven patients with 4182 brain metastases across 11 international institutions were analyzed. The median follow-up for all patients was 13.4 months. The median follow-up was 12.8 months and 14.1 months for the concurrent and nonconcurrent groups, respectively (P = .03). The median patient age was 66 years, and the median Karnofsky Performance Status was 90. In patients with any grade RN, 1- and 2-year rates were 6.4% and 9.9%, respectively. In patients with SRN, 1- and 2-year rates were 4.8% and 7.2%, respectively. On RPA, the highest-fidelity models consistently identified V12 Gy as the dominant variable predictive of RN. Three risk groups were identified by V12 Gy: (1) < 12 cm3; (2) 20 cm3 ≥ V12 Gy ≥ 12 cm3; (3) V12 Gy > 20 cm3. In patients with any grade RN, 1-year rates were 3.7% (V12 Gy < 12 cm3), 10.3% (20 cm3 ≥ V12 Gy ≥ 12 cm3), and 12.6% (V12 Gy > 20 cm3); the 2-year rates were 7.5% (V12 Gy < 12 cm3), 13.8% (20 cm3 ≥ V12 Gy ≥ 12 cm3), and 15.4% (V12 Gy > 20 cm3) (P < 0.001). In patients with any SRN, 1-year rates were 2.4% (V12 Gy < 12 cm3), 8.9% (20 cm3 ≥ V12 Gy ≥ 12 cm3), and 10.3% (V12 Gy > 20 cm3); the 2-year rates were 4.4% (V12 Gy < 12 cm3), 12.4% (20 cm3 ≥ V12 Gy ≥ 12 cm3), and 13.1% (V12 Gy > 20 cm3; P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in rates of any grade RN or SRN when accounting for therapy timing for all patients and by V12 risk group identified on RPA. CONCLUSIONS The use of SRS and ICI results in a low risk of any grade RN and SRN. This risk is not increased with concurrent administration. Therefore, ICI can safely be administered within 4-weeks of SRS. Three risk groups based on V12 Gy were identified, which clinicians may consider to further reduce rates of RN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
| | - Roman O Kowalchuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minneapolis
| | - Jason Gurewitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Kenneth Bernstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Douglas Kondziolka
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Zhishuo Wei
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kareem R Fakhoury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Chad G Rusthoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Quebec, Canada
| | - Claire Trudel
- Department of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Quebec, Canada
| | - Timothy D Malouff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Henry Ruiz-Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Phillip Bonney
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Lindsay Hwang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Cheng Yu
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Gabriel Zada
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Samir Patel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | - Piero Picozzi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Andrea Franzini
- Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Luca Attuati
- Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Rahul N Prasad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Raju R Raval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taiwan
| | | | - Brianna M Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Sonam Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | | | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Oshima S, Hagiwara A, Raymond C, Wang C, Cho NS, Lu J, Eldred BSC, Nghiemphu PL, Lai A, Telesca D, Salamon N, Cloughesy TF, Ellingson BM. Change in volumetric tumor growth rate after cytotoxic therapy is predictive of overall survival in recurrent glioblastoma. Neurooncol Adv 2023; 5:vdad084. [PMID: 37554221 PMCID: PMC10406419 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdad084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Alterations in tumor growth rate (TGR) in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) after treatment may be useful for identifying therapeutic activity. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of volumetric TGR alterations on overall survival (OS) in rGBM treated with chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy (RT). Methods Sixty-one rGBM patients treated with chemotherapy with or without concomitant radiation therapy (RT) at 1st or 2nd recurrence were retrospectively examined. Pre- and post-treatment contrast enhancing volumes were computed. Patients were considered "responders" if they reached progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6) and showed a decrease in TGR after treatment and "non-responders" if they didn't reach PFS6 or if TGR increased. Results Stratification by PFS6 and based on TGR resulted in significant differences in OS both for all patients and for patients without RT (P < 0.05). A decrease of TGR (P = 0.009), smaller baseline tumor volume (P = 0.02), O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation (P = 0.048) and fewer number of recurrences (P = 0.048) were significantly associated with longer OS after controlling for age, sex and concomitant RT. Conclusion A decrease in TGR in patients with PFS6, along with smaller baseline tumor volume, were associated with a significantly longer OS in rGBM treated with chemotherapy with or without radiation. Importantly, all patients that exhibited PFS6 also showed a measurable decrease in TGR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonoko Oshima
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Akifumi Hagiwara
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Catalina Raymond
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Chencai Wang
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nicholas S Cho
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Medical Scientist Training Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jianwen Lu
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Blaine S C Eldred
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Phioanh L Nghiemphu
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Albert Lai
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Donatello Telesca
- Department of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Noriko Salamon
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cost Matrix of Molecular Pathology in Glioma-Towards AI-Driven Rational Molecular Testing and Precision Care for the Future. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10123029. [PMID: 36551786 PMCID: PMC9775648 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10123029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Gliomas are the most common and aggressive primary brain tumors. Gliomas carry a poor prognosis because of the tumor's resistance to radiation and chemotherapy leading to nearly universal recurrence. Recent advances in large-scale genomic research have allowed for the development of more targeted therapies to treat glioma. While precision medicine can target specific molecular features in glioma, targeted therapies are often not feasible due to the lack of actionable markers and the high cost of molecular testing. This review summarizes the clinically relevant molecular features in glioma and the current cost of care for glioma patients, focusing on the molecular markers and meaningful clinical features that are linked to clinical outcomes and have a realistic possibility of being measured, which is a promising direction for precision medicine using artificial intelligence approaches.
Collapse
|
13
|
Gherasim-Morogai N, Afrasanie VA, Gafton B, Marinca MV, Alexa-Stratulat T. Can Extended Chemotherapy Improve Glioblastoma Outcomes? A Retrospective Analysis of Survival in Real-World Patients. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12101670. [PMID: 36294809 PMCID: PMC9604763 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12101670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Revised: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Standard treatment for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is surgery followed by radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy with daily temozolomide (TMZ), and six subsequent TMZ 5/28-day cycles. Research has focused on identifying more effective alternatives to the current protocol, including extension of the number of adjuvant TMZ cycles. We performed a retrospective analysis of all GBM patients treated in our hospital (160 patients, 2011−2020). Median follow-up was 16.0 months. Analysis of prognostic factors was performed with a particular focus on the benefit of extending TMZ chemotherapy. Improved survival correlated with younger age, female gender, good performance status, absence of cognitive dysfunctions, no steroid use, and total tumor resection. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12 months and median overall survival (OS) was 20.0 months for the entire cohort. Median OS by adjuvant TMZ was 10.0 months if no adjuvant chemotherapy given (group 0), 15.0 months for patients that did not complete six TMZ cycles (group A), 24.0 months for those that did (group B), and 29.0 months for patients having received more than six cycles (group C) (p < 0.0001). At the three-year mark, 15.9% patients were alive in group A, 24.4% in group B and 38.1% in group C. Carefully selected GBM patients may derive benefit from extending the standard adjuvant chemotherapy beyond six TMZ cycles, but more data is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Bogdan Gafton
- Medical Oncology Department, Regional Institute of Oncology, 700483 Iasi, Romania
- Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania
| | - Mihai Vasile Marinca
- Medical Oncology Department, Regional Institute of Oncology, 700483 Iasi, Romania
- Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania
- Correspondence:
| | - Teodora Alexa-Stratulat
- Medical Oncology Department, Regional Institute of Oncology, 700483 Iasi, Romania
- Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ventz S, Khozin S, Louv B, Sands J, Wen PY, Rahman R, Comment L, Alexander BM, Trippa L. The design and evaluation of hybrid controlled trials that leverage external data and randomization. Nat Commun 2022; 13:5783. [PMID: 36184621 PMCID: PMC9527257 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33192-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient-level data from completed clinical studies or electronic health records can be used in the design and analysis of clinical trials. However, these external data can bias the evaluation of the experimental treatment when the statistical design does not appropriately account for potential confounders. In this work, we introduce a hybrid clinical trial design that combines the use of external control datasets and randomization to experimental and control arms, with the aim of producing efficient inference on the experimental treatment effects. Our analysis of the hybrid trial design includes scenarios where the distributions of measured and unmeasured prognostic patient characteristics differ across studies. Using simulations and datasets from clinical studies in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer and glioblastoma, we illustrate the potential advantages of hybrid trial designs compared to externally controlled trials and randomized trial designs. Patient-level external control data from prior clinical studies or electronic health records can be used in the design and analysis of clinical trials. Here the authors report a hybrid trial design combining the use of external control data and randomization to test experimental treatments, using small cell lung cancer and glioblastoma datasets as examples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffen Ventz
- Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| | | | - Bill Louv
- Project Data Sphere, Morrisville, NC, USA
| | - Jacob Sands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rifaquat Rahman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Brian M Alexander
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Foundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Lorenzo Trippa
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR. Primary Spinal Glioblastoma Mimicking Neuroschistosomiasis: A Case Report. Cureus 2022; 14:e30248. [PMID: 36381781 PMCID: PMC9652719 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Primary glioblastoma of the spinal cord (sGB) is a rare and challenging diagnosis. In the diagnostic algorithm, reversible causes should be considered while the diagnosis of sGB is under evaluation. We present a case of cervical sGB mimicking neuroschistosomiasis. A 21-year-old Somali man presented with neck pain, sensory disturbances, and spastic tetraplegia. Cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging with contrast showed a heterogeneously enhancing intramedullary mass spanning from the level of the C1 to T3 vertebrae. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis showed a lymphocytic predominance and elevated protein. Due to the patient's history of poorly treated schistosomiasis, praziquantel and dexamethasone were initiated while the diagnostic work-up was completed. Three days after the patient was discharged to a rehabilitation facility where he experienced worsened motor function with radiographic progression of the lesion and increased cord edema. The patient underwent a surgical biopsy which confirmed a diagnosis of primary sGB. sGB is an unusual diagnosis that can masquerade as a non-neoplastic lesion. However, the diagnosis of sGB should be considered in patients with an intramedullary spinal cord lesion who exhibit rapid radiographic and clinical progression.
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhao R, Zhuge Y, Camphausen K, Krauze AV. Machine learning based survival prediction in Glioma using large-scale registry data. Health Informatics J 2022; 28:14604582221135427. [PMID: 36264067 PMCID: PMC10673681 DOI: 10.1177/14604582221135427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
Gliomas are the most common central nervous system tumors exhibiting poor clinical outcomes. The ability to estimate prognosis is crucial for both patients and providers in order to select the most appropriate treatment. Machine learning (ML) allows for sophisticated approaches to survival prediction using real world clinical parameters needed to achieve superior predictive accuracy. We employed Cox Proportional hazards (CPH) model, Support Vector Machine (SVM) model, Random Forest (RF) model in a large glioma dataset (3462 patients, diagnosed 2000-2018) to explore the most optimal approach to survival prediction. Features employed were age, sex, surgical resection status, tumor histology and tumor site, administration of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy status. Concordance index (c-index) was employed to assess the accuracy of survival time prediction. All three models performed well with prediction accuracy (CI 0.767, 0.771, 0.57 for CPH, SVM, RF models respectively) with the best performance achieved when incorporating RT and chemotherapy administration status which emerged as key predictive features. Within the subset of glioblastoma patients, similar prediction accuracy was achieved. These findings should prompt stricter clinician oversight over registry data accuracy through quality assurance as we move towards meaningful predictive ability using ML approaches in glioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Andra V Krauze
- 3421National Cancer Institute, NIH, USA; 184934BC Cancer Surrey, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ellingson BM, Levin VA, Cloughesy TF. Radiographic Response Assessment Strategies for Early-Phase Brain Trials in Complex Tumor Types and Drug Combinations: from Digital "Flipbooks" to Control Systems Theory. Neurotherapeutics 2022; 19:1855-1868. [PMID: 35451676 PMCID: PMC9723080 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-022-01241-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
There is an urgent need for drug development in brain tumors. While current radiographic response assessment provides instructions for identifying large treatment effects in simple high- and low-grade gliomas, there remains a void of strategies to evaluate complex or difficult to measure tumors or tumors of mixed grade with enhancing and non-enhancing components. Furthermore, most patients exhibit some period of alteration in tumor growth after starting a new therapy, but simple response categorization (e.g., stable disease, progressive disease) fails to provide any meaningful insight into the depth or degree of potential "subclinical" therapeutic response. We propose a creative solution to these issues based on a tiered strategy meant to increase confidence in identifying therapeutic effects even in the most challenging tumor types, while also providing a framework for complex evaluation of combination and sequential treatment schemes. Specifically, we demonstrate the utility of digital "flipbooks" to quickly identify subtle changes in complex tumors. We show how a modified Levin criteria can be used to quantify the degree of visual changes, while establishing estimates of the association between tumor volume and visual inspection. Lastly, we introduce the concept of quantifying therapeutic response using control systems theory. We propose measuring changes in volume (proportional), the area under the volume vs. time curve (integral) and changes in growth rates (derivative) to utilize a "PID" controller model of single or combination therapeutic activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Department of Radiologic Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Brain Tumor Program, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Victor A Levin
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, UCSF Medical School, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Brain Tumor Program, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mackenzie P, Vajdic C, Delaney G, Comans T, Morris L, Agar M, Gabriel G, Barton M. Radiotherapy utilisation rates for patients with cancer as a function of age: A systematic review. J Geriatr Oncol 2022; 14:101387. [PMID: 36272958 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is an increasing incidence of cancer in older people, but limited data on radiotherapy uptake, and in particular, radiotherapy utilisation (RTU) rates. The RTU rate for older adults with cancer may be lower than recommended due to lower tolerance for radiotherapy as well as additional comorbidities, reduced life expectancy and travel for treatment. Radiotherapy use must be aligned with best available, age-specific evidence to ensure older adults with cancer receive optimal benefit without harms. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review was conducted to synthesise the published data on the actual RTU rate for patients with cancer as a function of age. MEDLINE and EMBASE were systematically searched to identify relevant population-based and hospital-based cohort studies on radiotherapy utilisation for all age groups, published in English, from 1 January 1990 to 1 July 2020. We focused on the following common cancers in older adults for which radiotherapy is recommended: breast, prostate, lung, rectal cancer, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), and cervical cancer. Age-specific radiotherapy utilisation data were extracted and analysed as a narrative synthesis. RESULTS From 2606 studies screened, 75 cohort and population-based studies were identified with age-specific radiotherapy utilisation data. The total number of patients in the 75 studies was 4,792,138. The RTU rate decreased with increasing age for all tumour sites analysed, except for patients receiving curative radiotherapy as definitive treatment for prostate or cervical cancer. This reduction with increasing age was demonstrated in both palliative and curative settings. DISCUSSION There is a global reduction in radiotherapy utilisation with increasing age for most tumour sites. The reduction in delivery of radiotherapy warrants further examination and evidence-based guidelines specific to this population.
Collapse
|
19
|
Prajapati HP, Singh DK. Recurrent glioblastoma in elderly: Options and decision for the treatment. Surg Neurol Int 2022; 13:397. [PMID: 36128156 PMCID: PMC9479573 DOI: 10.25259/sni_552_2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adult. Its incidence increases with age and nearly half of the all newly diagnosed GBM cases are older than 65 years. Management of GBM in elderly is challenging and recurrence poses further challenge. This article aims to review the literature, evaluate the various options, and to decide the treatment plan in elderly cases with GBM recurrence. Methods: A systemic search was performed with the phrase “recurrent GBM (rGBM) in elderly and management” as a search term in PubMed central, Medline, and Embase databases to identify all the articles published on the subject till February 2022. The review included peer-reviewed original articles, review articles, clinical trials, and keywords in title and abstract. Results: Out of 473 articles searched, 15 studies followed our inclusion criteria and were included in this review. In 15 studies, ten were original and five were review articles. The minimum age group included in these studies was ≥65 years. Out of 15 studies, eight studies had described the role of resurgery, four chemotherapy, three resurgery and/or chemotherapy, and only one study on role of reradiotherapy in patients with rGBM. Out of eight studies described the role of resurgery, six have mentioned improved survival and two have no survival advantage of resurgery in cases of rGBM. Conclusion: Resurgery is the main treatment option in selected elderly rGBM cases in good performance status. In patients with poor performance status, chemotherapy has better post progression survival than best supportive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Deepak Kumar Singh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ellingson BM, Gerstner ER, Lassman AB, Chung C, Colman H, Cole PE, Leung D, Allen JE, Ahluwalia MS, Boxerman J, Brown M, Goldin J, Nduom E, Hassan I, Gilbert MR, Mellinghoff IK, Weller M, Chang S, Arons D, Meehan C, Selig W, Tanner K, Alfred Yung WK, van den Bent M, Wen PY, Cloughesy TF. Hypothetical generalized framework for a new imaging endpoint of therapeutic activity in early phase clinical trials in brain tumors. Neuro Oncol 2022; 24:1219-1229. [PMID: 35380705 PMCID: PMC9340639 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Imaging response assessment is a cornerstone of patient care and drug development in oncology. Clinicians/clinical researchers rely on tumor imaging to estimate the impact of new treatments and guide decision making for patients and candidate therapies. This is important in brain cancer, where associations between tumor size/growth and emerging neurological deficits are strong. Accurately measuring the impact of a new therapy on tumor growth early in clinical development, where patient numbers are small, would be valuable for decision making regarding late-stage development activation. Current attempts to measure the impact of a new therapy have limited influence on clinical development, as determination of progression, stability or response does not currently account for individual tumor growth kinetics prior to the initiation of experimental therapies. Therefore, we posit that imaging-based response assessment, often used as a tool for estimating clinical effect, is incomplete as it does not adequately account for growth trajectories or biological characteristics of tumors prior to the introduction of an investigational agent. Here, we propose modifications to the existing framework for evaluating imaging assessment in primary brain tumors that will provide a more reliable understanding of treatment effects. Measuring tumor growth trajectories prior to a given intervention may allow us to more confidently conclude whether there is an anti-tumor effect. This updated approach to imaging-based tumor response assessment is intended to improve our ability to select candidate therapies for later-stage development, including those that may not meet currently sought thresholds for "response" and ultimately lead to identification of effective treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Elizabeth R Gerstner
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrew B Lassman
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Caroline Chung
- University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Howard Colman
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | - David Leung
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | | | | | - Jerrold Boxerman
- Rhode Island Hospital and Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Matthew Brown
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jonathan Goldin
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Edjah Nduom
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Islam Hassan
- Servier Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ingo K Mellinghoff
- Department of Neurology and Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Susan Chang
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - David Arons
- National Brain Tumor Society, Newton, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Clair Meehan
- National Brain Tumor Society, Newton, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Kirk Tanner
- National Brain Tumor Society, Newton, Massachusetts, USA
| | - W K Alfred Yung
- University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Martin van den Bent
- Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- UCLA Neuro Oncology Program, Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
McMahon DJ, Gleeson JP, O'Reilly S, Bambury RM. Management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: current state of the art and emerging therapeutic approaches. Med Oncol 2022; 39:129. [PMID: 35716200 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-022-01708-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme represent > 50% of primary gliomas and have five year survival rates of ~ 5%. Maximal safe surgical resection followed by radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide remains the standard treatment since published by Stupp et al. (in N Engl J Med 352:987-996, 2005), with additional benefit for patients with MGMT-methylated tumors. We review the current treatment landscape and ongoing efforts to improve these outcomes. An extensive literature search of Pubmed and Google Scholar involving the search terms "glioblastoma," "glioblastoma multiforme," or "GBM" for papers published to July 2021 was conducted and papers evaluated for relevance. As well as current data that informs clinical practice, we review ongoing clinical research in both newly diagnosed and recurrent settings that provides hope for a breakthrough. The Stupp protocol remains standard of care in 2021. Addition of tumor treating fields improved mOS modestly, with benefit seen in MGMT-methylated and unmethylated cohorts and also improved time to cognitive decline but has not been widely adopted. The addition of lomustine to temozolomide, in MGMT-methylated patients, also showed a mOS benefit but further investigation is required. Other promising therapeutic strategies including anti-angiogenic therapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy have yet to show a survival advantage. Improvements in the multidisciplinary management, surgical techniques and equipment, early palliative care, carrier support, and psychological support may be responsible for improving survival over time. Despite promising preclinical rationale, immunotherapy and targeted therapy are struggling to impact survival. A number of ongoing clinical trials provide hope for a breakthrough.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D J McMahon
- Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland, UK.
| | | | - S O'Reilly
- Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ghogawala Z, Barker FG, Amin-Hanjani S, Schwartz SJ. Neurosurgical Study Design: Past and Future. World Neurosurg 2022; 161:405-409. [PMID: 35505560 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Clinical trials are performed to determine the safety, efficacy, or effectiveness of a medical or surgical intervention. A clinical trial is, by definition, prospective in nature with a uniform treatment of a defined patient cohort. The outcomes assessment should also be uniform. Often a control group is included. At present, the number of neurosurgical clinical trials is increasing, and the study designs have become more sophisticated. Historically, the standard of neurosurgical care has evolved from the findings from many case series and retrospective comparative studies. However, in the present report, we have focused exclusively on prospective clinical trials. An urgent need exists to understand how clinical trials have been performed in the past and how they can be improved to advance our neurosurgical practice. In the present review, we have discussed the barriers, successes, and failures regarding prospective clinical trials in neurosurgery with an outlook to the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoher Ghogawala
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - Fred G Barker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sepideh Amin-Hanjani
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sanford J Schwartz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Purpose of Review Elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (eGBM) carry a worse prognosis compared with their younger counterparts. eGBM garners special attention due to the unique challenges, including increased treatment-associated toxicity, less relative benefit from aggressive therapy, medical comorbidities, and immunosuppression. The pivotal GBM trials excluded patients > 70 years old and the optimal treatment approach remains unsettled for eGBM. In this review, we analyze the historical evidence-based data for treating eGBM and discuss the future direction for managing this vulnerable population. Recent Findings Treatment for eGBM continues to evolve. Therapy choice is guided by performance status and presence of O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation. For eGBM with good performance status, combinatorial hypofractionated radiation therapy (hRT) and temozolomide should be recommended. For those with poor performance status, further stratification based on MGMT promoter methylation test result is recommended. Single-agent temozolomide is a viable treatment option for MGMT methylated tumors (mMGMT); in particular, those classified with receptor tyrosine kinase II methylation. hRT alone can be considered in MGMT unmethylated (uMGMT) eGBM patients. As precision oncology continues to advance, effective targeted and immunotherapy may emerge as new treatment options for eGBM. Summary Management of elderly patients with newly diagnosed GBM carries a unique set of challenges. Progress has been made in defining the optimal therapeutic approach for these patients, but many questions remain to be answered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlen A. Yuen
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, 710 W 168th St, 9th Floor, New York, NY 10032 USA
| | - Marissa Barbaro
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, 710 W 168th St, 9th Floor, New York, NY 10032 USA
- Present Address: Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Hematology Oncology Associates – Mineola, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, Mineola, NY USA
| | - Aya Haggiagi
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, 710 W 168th St, 9th Floor, New York, NY 10032 USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lehrer EJ, Ruiz-Garcia H, Nehlsen AD, Sindhu KK, Estrada RS, Borst GR, Sheehan JP, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Trifiletti DM. Preoperative Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Glioblastoma. BIOLOGY 2022; 11:194. [PMID: 35205059 PMCID: PMC8869151 DOI: 10.3390/biology11020194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Glioblastoma is a devastating primary brain tumor with a median overall survival of approximately 15 months despite the use of optimal modern therapy. While GBM has been studied for decades, modern therapies have allowed for a reduction in treatment-related toxicities, while the prognosis has largely been unchanged. Adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was previously studied in GBM; however, the results were disappointing. SRS is a highly conformal radiation technique that permits the delivery of high doses of ionizing radiation in 1-5 sessions while largely sparing surrounding healthy tissues. Furthermore, studies have shown that the delivery of ablative doses of ionizing radiation within the central nervous system is associated with enhanced anti-tumor immunity. While SRS is commonly used in the definitive and adjuvant settings for other CNS malignancies, its role in the preoperative setting has become a topic of great interest due to the potential for reduced treatment volumes due to the treatment of an intact tumor, and a lower risk of nodular leptomeningeal disease and radiation necrosis. While early reports of SRS in the adjuvant setting for glioblastoma were disappointing, its role in the preoperative setting and its impact on the anti-tumor adaptive immune response is largely unknown. In this review, we provide an overview of GBM, discuss the potential role of preoperative SRS, and discuss the possible immunogenic effects of this therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J. Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (E.J.L.); (A.D.N.); (K.K.S.)
| | - Henry Ruiz-Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA; (H.R.-G.); (R.S.E.)
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA;
| | - Anthony D. Nehlsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (E.J.L.); (A.D.N.); (K.K.S.)
| | - Kunal K. Sindhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (E.J.L.); (A.D.N.); (K.K.S.)
| | - Rachel Sarabia Estrada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA; (H.R.-G.); (R.S.E.)
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA;
| | - Gerben R. Borst
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK;
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, The University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK
| | - Jason P. Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA;
| | | | - Daniel M. Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA; (H.R.-G.); (R.S.E.)
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Park LJ, Daza JF, Li V, Workneh A, Zuk V, Claasen MPA, Hallet J, Martel G, Sapisochin G, Serrano PE. Prognostic factors of overall survival in patients with recurrent disease following liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases: A multicenter external validation study. J Surg Oncol 2022; 125:872-879. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.26796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lily J. Park
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada
| | - Julian F. Daza
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Vivian Li
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada
| | - Aklile Workneh
- Liver and Pancreas Unit, Department of Surgery The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa Ottawa Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Canada
| | - Victoria Zuk
- Division of General Surgery Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre–Odette Cancer Centre Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Marco P. A. Claasen
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Julie Hallet
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
- Division of General Surgery Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre–Odette Cancer Centre Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Guillaume Martel
- Liver and Pancreas Unit, Department of Surgery The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa Ottawa Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Canada
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
- Multi‐Organ Transplant and HPB Surgical Oncology, Division of General Surgery Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Pablo E. Serrano
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Chunduru P, Phillips JJ, Molinaro AM. Prognostic risk stratification of gliomas using deep learning in digital pathology images. Neurooncol Adv 2022; 4:vdac111. [PMID: 35990705 PMCID: PMC9389424 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Evaluation of tumor-tissue images stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) is pivotal in diagnosis, yet only a fraction of the rich phenotypic information is considered for clinical care. Here, we propose a survival deep learning (SDL) framework to extract this information to predict glioma survival. Methods Digitized whole slide images were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for 766 diffuse glioma patients, including isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant/1p19q-codeleted oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant/1p19q-intact astrocytoma, and IDH-wildtype astrocytoma/glioblastoma. Our SDL framework employs a residual convolutional neural network with a survival model to predict patient risk from H&E-stained whole-slide images. We used statistical sampling techniques and randomized the transformation of images to address challenges in learning from histology images. The SDL risk score was evaluated in traditional and recursive partitioning (RPA) survival models. Results The SDL risk score demonstrated substantial univariate prognostic power (median concordance index of 0.79 [se: 0.01]). After adjusting for age and World Health Organization 2016 subtype, the SDL risk score was significantly associated with overall survival (OS; hazard ratio = 2.45; 95% CI: 2.01 to 3.00). Four distinct survival risk groups were characterized by RPA based on SDL risk score, IDH status, and age with markedly different median OS ranging from 1.03 years to 14.14 years. Conclusions The present study highlights the independent prognostic power of the SDL risk score for objective and accurate prediction of glioma outcomes. Further, we show that the RPA delineation of patient-specific risk scores and clinical prognostic factors can successfully demarcate the OS of glioma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pranathi Chunduru
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Joanna J Phillips
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Annette M Molinaro
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kelly PD, Dambrino RJ, Guidry BS, Tang AR, Stewart TG, Mistry A, Morone PJ, Chambless LB. Red blood cell distribution width in glioblastoma. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2021; 213:107096. [PMID: 34973653 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.107096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and deadly adult brain tumor. Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) has been found in non-central nervous system neoplasms to be associated with survival. This study aims to assess the prognostic value of pre-operative RDW and trends in RDW over time during the disease course. METHODS This single-institution retrospective cohort study identified patients ≥ 18 years old with pathology-proved glioblastoma treated between April 2003-May 2017 from an institutional database. A Cox proportional hazards model was developed using known prognostic clinical variables to predict overall survival time; a second model incorporating continuously valued RDW was then created. The additional prognostic value of RDW was assessed with a joint model F-test. The variation of RDW-CV over time was evaluated with linear mixed model of RDW. A post-hoc exploratory analysis was performed to assess the trend in RDW lab value leading up to time of death. RESULTS 346 adult GBM patients were identified; complete survival data was available for all patients. The addition of RDW to the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model did not increase prognostic value. There was an upward trend in RDW throughout the post-operative disease course. In a post-hoc analysis, there was an upward trend in RDW leading up to the time of death. CONCLUSION Although RDW has been prognostic of survival for many inflammatory, prothrombotic, and neoplastic diseases, pre-operative RDW was not associated with overall survival in GBM patients. RDW trended upwards throughout the disease course, suggesting possible systemic inflammatory effects of either glioblastoma or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick D Kelly
- Department of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Robert J Dambrino
- Department of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
| | - Bradley S Guidry
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Alan R Tang
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Thomas G Stewart
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Akshitkumar Mistry
- Department of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Peter J Morone
- Department of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Lola B Chambless
- Department of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Klement RJ, Popp I, Kaul D, Ehret F, Grosu AL, Polat B, Sweeney RA, Lewitzki V. Accelerated hyper-versus normofractionated radiochemotherapy with temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis. J Neurooncol 2021; 156:407-417. [PMID: 34940951 PMCID: PMC8817053 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03926-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Background and purpose The standard treatment of glioblastoma patients consists of surgery followed by normofractionated radiotherapy (NFRT) with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy. Whether accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) yields comparable results to NFRT in combination with temozolomide has only sparsely been investigated. The objective of this study was to compare NFRT with HFRT in a multicenter analysis. Materials and methods A total of 484 glioblastoma patients from four centers were retrospectively pooled and analyzed. Three-hundred-ten and 174 patients had been treated with NFRT (30 × 1.8 Gy or 30 × 2 Gy) and HFRT (37 × 1.6 Gy or 30 × 1.8 Gy twice/day), respectively. The primary outcome of interest was overall survival (OS) which was correlated with patient-, tumor- and treatment-related variables via univariable and multivariable Cox frailty models. For multivariable modeling, missing covariates were imputed using multiple imputation by chained equations, and a sensitivity analysis was performed on the complete-cases-only dataset. Results After a median follow-up of 15.7 months (range 0.8–88.6 months), median OS was 16.9 months (15.0–18.7 months) in the NFRT group and 14.9 months (13.2–17.3 months) in the HFRT group (p = 0.26). In multivariable frailty regression, better performance status, gross-total versus not gross-total resection, MGMT hypermethylation, IDH mutation, smaller planning target volume and salvage therapy were significantly associated with longer OS (all p < 0.01). Treatment differences (HFRT versus NFRT) had no significant effect on OS in either univariable or multivariable analysis. Conclusions Since HFRT with temozolomide was not associated with worse OS, we assume HFRT to be a potential option for patients wishing to shorten their treatment time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rainer J Klement
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Leopoldina Krankenhaus Schweinfurt, MVZ Leopoldina Krankenhaus, Robert-Koch-Straße 10, 97422, Schweinfurt, Germany. .,Klinik für Radio-Onkologie, Universitätsspital Zürich, Universität Zürich, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Ilinca Popp
- Klinik für Strahlenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Klinik Für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Ehret
- Klinik Für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Klinik für Strahlenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bülent Polat
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Reinhart A Sweeney
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Leopoldina Krankenhaus Schweinfurt, MVZ Leopoldina Krankenhaus, Robert-Koch-Straße 10, 97422, Schweinfurt, Germany
| | - Victor Lewitzki
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Machine Learning-Based Radiomics in Neuro-Oncology. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA. SUPPLEMENT 2021; 134:139-151. [PMID: 34862538 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-85292-4_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
In the last decades, modern medicine has evolved into a data-centered discipline, generating massive amounts of granular high-dimensional data exceeding human comprehension. With improved computational methods, machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) as tools for data processing and analysis are becoming more and more important. At the forefront of neuro-oncology and AI-research, the field of radiomics has emerged. Non-invasive assessments of quantitative radiological biomarkers mined from complex imaging characteristics across various applications are used to predict survival, discriminate between primary and secondary tumors, as well as between progression and pseudo-progression. In particular, the application of molecular phenotyping, envisioned in the field of radiogenomics, has gained popularity for both primary and secondary brain tumors. Although promising results have been obtained thus far, the lack of workflow standardization and availability of multicenter data remains challenging. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of novel applications of machine learning- and deep learning-based radiomics in primary and secondary brain tumors and their implications for future research in the field.
Collapse
|
30
|
Sudibio S, Anton J, Handoko H, Mayang Permata TB, Kodrat H, Nuryadi E, Sofyan HR, Mulyadi R, Aman RA, Gondhowiardjo S. Outcome Analysis and Prognostic Factors in Patients of Glioblastoma Multiforme: An Indonesian Single Institution Experience. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2021. [DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2021.7502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims: This study was done to assess the survival of patients with glioblastoma multiform and to identify factors that can affect patient survival.
Materials and methods: From January 2015 to December 2019, 55 patients with histopathologically confirmed glioblastoma multiform and received adjuvant radiation/chemoradiation in our department were retrospectively analyzed.
Results: The median overall survival (OS) for entire cohort was 13 months and 1-year OS and 2-year OS rate were 52.7% and 3.6% with the mean follow-up period was 12 months. In univariate analysis, age (≤50 years vs >50 years, p=0.02), performance status (≥90 vs 70-80 vs <70, p<0.001), RTOG RPA classification (class III vs class IV vs class V-VI, p<0.001), parietal lobes tumor site (vs others, p=0.02), residual tumor volume (≤20.4cm3 vs >20.4cm3, p=0.001) and time to initiate adjuvant therapy (<4 weeks vs 4-6 weeks vs >6 weeks, p=0.01) were significantly affect overall survival. In multivariate analysis, RTOG RPA classification and involvement of parietal lobes were independent prognostic factors for overall survival.
Conclusions: RTOG RPA classification that consisted of age and performance status is an independent prognostic factor for the clinical outcome of GBM. Besides this well-known factor, we also identified the involvement of parietal lobe gives a strong negative influence on survival of GBM patients.
Collapse
|
31
|
Gregucci F, Surgo A, Bonaparte I, Laera L, Ciliberti MP, Carbonara R, Gentile MA, Giraldi D, Calbi R, Caliandro M, Sasso N, D’Oria S, Somma C, Martinelli G, Surico G, Lombardi G, Fiorentino A. Poor-Prognosis Patients Affected by Glioblastoma: Retrospective Study of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy with Simultaneous Integrated Boost and Concurrent/Adjuvant Temozolomide. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11111145. [PMID: 34834497 PMCID: PMC8619413 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11111145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Revised: 10/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is a very poor-prognosis brain tumor. To date, maximal excision followed by radiochemotherapy, in 30 fractions, is the standard approach. Limited data are present in the literature about hypofractionated radiotherapy (hypo-RT) in GBM poor prognosis patients. Thus, this retrospective study was conducted to evaluate efficacy and toxicity of hypo-RT with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in association with temozolomide (TMZ) in this patient setting. METHODS Poor-prognosis GBM patients underwent surgery (complete, subtotal or biopsy) followed by SIB-hypo-RT and concomitant/adjuvant TMZ. The prescription dose was 40.05 Gy (15 fractions) with a SIB of 52.5 Gy (3.5 Gy/fraction) on surgical cavity/residual/macroscopic disease. Volumetric modulated arc therapy was performed. RESULTS From July 2019 to July 2021, 30 poor-prognosis patients affected by GBM were treated by SIB-hypo-RT; 25 were evaluated in the present analysis due to a minimum follow up of 6 months. The median age and KPS were 65 years and 60%, respectively. At the median follow-up time of 15 months (range 7-24), median and 1-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 13 months and 54%, and 8.4 months and 23%, respectively. No acute or late neurological side effects of grade ≥ 2 were reported. Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity occurred in three cases. CONCLUSION SIB-hypo-RT associated with TMZ in poor-prognosis patients affected by GBM is an effective and safe treatment. Prospective studies could be warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabiana Gregucci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy; (F.G.); (A.S.); (I.B.); (M.P.C.); (R.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Alessia Surgo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy; (F.G.); (A.S.); (I.B.); (M.P.C.); (R.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Ilaria Bonaparte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy; (F.G.); (A.S.); (I.B.); (M.P.C.); (R.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Letizia Laera
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy; (L.L.); (N.S.); (G.S.)
| | - Maria Paola Ciliberti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy; (F.G.); (A.S.); (I.B.); (M.P.C.); (R.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Roberta Carbonara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy; (F.G.); (A.S.); (I.B.); (M.P.C.); (R.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Maria Annunziata Gentile
- Department of Radiology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy; (M.A.G.); (R.C.); (G.M.)
| | - David Giraldi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy; (D.G.); (S.D.); (C.S.)
| | - Roberto Calbi
- Department of Radiology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy; (M.A.G.); (R.C.); (G.M.)
| | - Morena Caliandro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy; (F.G.); (A.S.); (I.B.); (M.P.C.); (R.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Nicola Sasso
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy; (L.L.); (N.S.); (G.S.)
| | - Salvatore D’Oria
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy; (D.G.); (S.D.); (C.S.)
| | - Carlo Somma
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy; (D.G.); (S.D.); (C.S.)
| | - Gaetano Martinelli
- Department of Radiology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy; (M.A.G.); (R.C.); (G.M.)
| | - Giammarco Surico
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy; (L.L.); (N.S.); (G.S.)
| | - Giuseppe Lombardi
- Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Padova, Italy;
| | - Alba Fiorentino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy; (F.G.); (A.S.); (I.B.); (M.P.C.); (R.C.); (M.C.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0803054608
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
Objective While adjuvant treatment regimens have been modified for older patients with glioblastoma (GBM), surgical strategies have not been tailored. Methods Clinical data of 48 consecutive patients aged 70 years or older, who underwent surgical resection for GBM with intraoperative ultrasonography (IoUS) alone or combination with intraoperative MRI (IoMRI) at Yale New Haven Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Variables were analyzed, and comparative analyses were performed. Results The addition of IoMRI was not superior to IoUS alone in terms of overall survival (OS) (P = 0.306), Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) at postoperative 6 weeks (P = 0.704) or extent of resection (P = 0.263). Length of surgery (LOSx), however, was significantly longer (P = 0.0002) in the IoMRI group. LOSx (P = 0.015) and hospital stay (P = 0.025) were predictors of postoperative complications. Increased EOR (GTR or NTR) (P = 0.030), postoperative adjuvant treatment (P < 0.0001) and postoperative complications (P = 0.006) were predictive for OS. Patients with relatively lower preoperative KPS scores (<70) showed significant improvement at postoperative 6 weeks (P<0.0001). Patients with complications (P = 0.038) were more likely to have lower KPS at postoperative 6 weeks. Conclusions Aggressive management with surgical resection should be considered in older patients with GBM, even those with relatively poor KPS. The use of ioMRI in this population does not appear to confer any measurable benefit over ioUS in experienced hands, but prolongs the length of surgery significantly, which is a preventable prognostic factor for impeding care. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-021-03862-z.
Collapse
|
33
|
Molinaro AM, Wiencke JK, Warrier G, Koestler DC, Chunduru P, Lee JY, Hansen HM, Lee S, Anguiano J, Rice T, Bracci PM, McCoy L, Salas LA, Christensen BC, Wrensch M, Kelsey KT, Taylor JW, Clarke JL. Interactions of Age and Blood Immune Factors and Non-Invasive Prediction of Glioma Survival. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 114:446-457. [PMID: 34597382 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumor-based classification of human glioma portends patient prognosis; however, considerable unexplained survival variability remains. Host factors (eg, age) also strongly influence survival times, partly reflecting a compromised immune system. How blood epigenetic measures of immune characteristics and age augment molecular classifications in glioma survival has not been investigated. We assess the prognostic impact of immune-cell fractions and epigenetic age in archived blood across glioma molecular subtypes for the first time. METHODS We evaluated immune-cell fractions and epigenetic age in archived blood from the University of California San Francisco Adult Glioma Study, including a training set of 197 IDH-wildtype, 1p19q intact, TERT wildtype (IDH/1p19q/TERT-WT) glioma patients, an evaluation set of 350 patients with other subtypes of glioma, and 454 subjects without glioma. RESULTS IDH/1p19q/TERT-WT patients had lower lymphocyte fractions (CD4+T, CD8+T, natural killer, and B cells) and higher neutrophil fractions than subjects without glioma. Recursive partitioning analysis delineated four statistically significantly different survival groups for IDH/1p19q/TERT-WT patients based on an interaction between chronological age and two blood immune factors, CD4+T cells, and neutrophils with median overall survival ranging from 0.76 years [95% confidence intervaI = 0.55 to 0.99] for the worst survival group (n = 28) to 9.72 years [95% confidence intervaI = 6.18 to NA] for the best (n = 33). The Recursive partitioning analysis also statistically significantly delineated four risk groups in patients with other glioma subtypes. CONCLUSION The delineation of different survival groups in the training and evaluation sets based on an interaction between chronological age and blood immune characteristics suggests that common host immune factors among different glioma types may impact survival. The ability of DNA methylation-based markers of immune status to capture diverse, clinically relevant information may facilitate non-invasive personalized patient evaluation in the neuro-oncology clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette M Molinaro
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - John K Wiencke
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Gayathri Warrier
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Devin C Koestler
- Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | - Ji Yoon Lee
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Helen M Hansen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sean Lee
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joaquin Anguiano
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Terri Rice
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Paige M Bracci
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lucie McCoy
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lucas A Salas
- Department of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Brock C Christensen
- Department of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA.,Departments of Molecular and Systems Biology, and Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Margaret Wrensch
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Karl T Kelsey
- Departments of Epidemiology and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Jennie W Taylor
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Neurology, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer L Clarke
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Neurology, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ellingson BM, Wen PY, Cloughesy TF. Therapeutic Response Assessment of High-Grade Gliomas During Early-Phase Drug Development in the Era of Molecular and Immunotherapies. Cancer J 2021; 27:395-403. [PMID: 34570454 PMCID: PMC8480435 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Several new therapeutic strategies have emerged over the past decades to address unmet clinical needs in high-grade gliomas, including targeted molecular agents and various forms of immunotherapy. Each of these strategies requires addressing fundamental questions, depending on the stage of drug development, including ensuring drug penetration into the brain, engagement of the drug with the desired target, biologic effects downstream from the target including metabolic and/or physiologic changes, and identifying evidence of clinical activity that could be expanded upon to increase the likelihood of a meaningful survival benefit. The current review article highlights these strategies and outlines how imaging technology can be used for therapeutic response evaluation in both targeted and immunotherapies in early phases of drug development in high-grade gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin M. Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Patrick Y. Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard University, Boston, MA
| | - Timothy F. Cloughesy
- UCLA Neuro Oncology Program, Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Derenzini E, Mazzara S, Melle F, Motta G, Fabbri M, Bruna R, Agostinelli C, Cesano A, Corsini CA, Chen N, Righi S, Sabattini E, Chiappella A, Calleri A, Fiori S, Tabanelli V, Cabras A, Pruneri G, Vitolo U, Gianni AM, Rambaldi A, Corradini P, Zinzani PL, Tarella C, Pileri S. A three-gene signature based on MYC, BCL-2 and NFKBIA improves risk stratification in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Haematologica 2021; 106:2405-2416. [PMID: 32817282 PMCID: PMC8409021 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2019.236455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent randomized trials focused on gene expression-based determination of the cell of origin in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma could not show significant improvements by adding novel agents to standard chemoimmunotherapy. The aim of this study was the identification of a gene signature able to refine current prognostication algorithms and applicable to clinical practice. Here we used a targeted gene expression profiling panel combining the Lymph2Cx signature for cell of origin classification with additional targets including MYC, BCL-2 and NFKBIA, in 186 patients from two randomized trials (discovery cohort) (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT00355199 and NCT00499018). Data were validated in three independent series (two large public datasets and a real-life cohort). By integrating the cell of origin, MYC/BCL-2 double expressor status and NFKBIA expression, we defined a three-gene signature combining MYC, BCL-2 and NFKBIA (MBN-signature), which outperformed the MYC/BCL-2 double expressor status in multivariate analysis, and allowed further risk stratification within the germinal center B-cell/unclassified subset. The high-risk (MBN Sig-high) subgroup identified the vast majority of double hit cases and a significant fraction of activated B-cell-derived diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. These results were validated in three independent series including a cohort from the REMoDL-B trial, where, in an exploratory ad hoc analysis, the addition of bortezomib in the MBN Sig-high subgroup provided a progression free survival advantage compared with standard chemoimmunotherapy. These data indicate that a simple three-gene signature based on MYC, BCL-2 and NFKBIA could refine the prognostic stratification in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and might be the basis for future precision-therapy approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Derenzini
- Onco-Hematology Division, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Saveria Mazzara
- Division of Diagnostic Haematopathology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Melle
- Division of Diagnostic Haematopathology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanna Motta
- Division of Diagnostic Haematopathology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Fabbri
- Division of Diagnostic Haematopathology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Bruna
- Onco-Hematology Division, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio Agostinelli
- Hematopathology Unit, Dept of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Bologna, Italy
| | | | | | - Ning Chen
- NanoString Technologies Inc, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Simona Righi
- Hematopathology Unit, Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Bologna
| | - Elena Sabattini
- Hematopathology Unit, Dept of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Bologna, Italy
| | - Annalisa Chiappella
- Division of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Angelica Calleri
- Division of Diagnostic Haematopathology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Fiori
- Division of Diagnostic Haematopathology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina Tabanelli
- Division of Diagnostic Haematopathology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonello Cabras
- Department of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Department of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Vitolo
- Multidisciplinary Oncology Outpatient Clinic, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo (Torino), Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Rambaldi
- Hematology and Bone marrow Transplant Unit, ASST-Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Paolo Corradini
- Division of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Pier Luigi Zinzani
- Hematology, Dept of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Bologna University, Italy
| | - Corrado Tarella
- Onco-Hematology Division, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Pileri
- Division of Diagnostic Haematopathology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Schröder C, Gramatzki D, Vu E, Guckenberger M, Andratschke N, Weller M, Hertler C. Radiotherapy for glioblastoma patients with poor performance status. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2021; 148:2127-2136. [PMID: 34448057 PMCID: PMC9293860 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-021-03770-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose There is limited information on treatment recommendations for glioblastoma patients with poor performance status. Here, we aim to evaluate the association of radiotherapy on survival in glioblastoma patients presenting with poor postoperative performance status in first-line setting. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data of 93 glioblastoma patients presenting with poor postoperative performance status (ECOG 2–4) at the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland, in the years 2005–2019. A total of 43 patients received radiotherapy with or without systemic therapy in the first-line setting, whereas 50 patients received no additive local or systemic treatment after initial biopsy or resection. Overall survival was calculated from primary diagnosis and from the end of radiotherapy. In addition, factors influencing survival were analyzed. Results Median overall survival from primary diagnosis was 6.2 months in the radiotherapy group (95% CI 6.2–14.8 weeks, range 2–149 weeks) and 2.3 months in the group without additive treatment (95% CI 1.3–7.4 weeks, range 0–28 weeks) (p < 0.001). This survival benefit was confirmed by landmark analyses. Factors associated with overall survival were extent of resection and administration of radiotherapy with or without systemic treatment. Median survival from end of radiotherapy was 3 months (95% CI 4.3–21.7 weeks, range 0–72 weeks), with 25.6% (n = 11) early termination of treatment and 83.7% (n = 36) requiring radiotherapy as in-patients. Performance status improved in 27.9% (n = 12) of patients after radiotherapy. Conclusion In this retrospective single-institution analysis, radiotherapy improved overall survival in patients with poor performance status, especially in patients who were amendable to neurosurgical resection. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-021-03770-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Schröder
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Competence Center for Palliative Care, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Dorothee Gramatzki
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Erwin Vu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Competence Center for Palliative Care, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Competence Center for Palliative Care, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Competence Center for Palliative Care, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Caroline Hertler
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Competence Center for Palliative Care, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Sagberg LM, Jakola AS, Reinertsen I, Solheim O. How well do neurosurgeons predict survival in patients with high-grade glioma? Neurosurg Rev 2021; 45:865-872. [PMID: 34382108 PMCID: PMC8827174 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-021-01613-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Due to the lack of reliable prognostic tools, prognostication and surgical decisions largely rely on the neurosurgeons’ clinical prediction skills. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of neurosurgeons’ prediction of survival in patients with high-grade glioma and explore factors possibly associated with accurate predictions. In a prospective single-center study, 199 patients who underwent surgery for high-grade glioma were included. After surgery, the operating surgeon predicted the patient’s survival using an ordinal prediction scale. A survival curve was used to visualize actual survival in groups based on this scale, and the accuracy of clinical prediction was assessed by comparing predicted and actual survival. To investigate factors possibly associated with accurate estimation, a binary logistic regression analysis was performed. The surgeons were able to differentiate between patients with different lengths of survival, and median survival fell within the predicted range in all groups with predicted survival < 24 months. In the group with predicted survival > 24 months, median survival was shorter than predicted. The overall accuracy of surgeons’ survival estimates was 41%, and over- and underestimations were done in 34% and 26%, respectively. Consultants were 3.4 times more likely to accurately predict survival compared to residents (p = 0.006). Our findings demonstrate that although especially experienced neurosurgeons have rather good predictive abilities when estimating survival in patients with high-grade glioma on the group level, they often miss on the individual level. Future prognostic tools should aim to beat the presented clinical prediction skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Millgård Sagberg
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. .,Department of Neurosurgery, St Olavs University Hospital, Olav Kyrres gt 17, 7006, Trondheim, Norway.
| | - Asgeir S Jakola
- Department of Neurosurgery, St Olavs University Hospital, Olav Kyrres gt 17, 7006, Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Neurosurgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ingerid Reinertsen
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Ole Solheim
- Department of Neurosurgery, St Olavs University Hospital, Olav Kyrres gt 17, 7006, Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Brown PD, Chung C, Liu DD, McAvoy S, Grosshans D, Al Feghali K, Mahajan A, Li J, McGovern SL, McAleer MF, Ghia AJ, Sulman EP, Penas-Prado M, de Groot JF, Heimberger AB, Wang J, Armstrong TS, Gilbert MR, Guha-Thakurta N, Wefel JS. A prospective phase II randomized trial of proton radiotherapy vs intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:1337-1347. [PMID: 33647972 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To determine if proton radiotherapy (PT), compared to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), delayed time to cognitive failure in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). METHODS Eligible patients were randomized unblinded to PT vs IMRT. The primary endpoint was time to cognitive failure. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), intracranial progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). RESULTS A total of 90 patients were enrolled and 67 were evaluable with median follow-up of 48.7 months (range 7.1-66.7). There was no significant difference in time to cognitive failure between treatment arms (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.45-1.75; P = .74). PT was associated with a lower rate of fatigue (24% vs 58%, P = .05), but otherwise, there were no significant differences in PROs at 6 months. There was no difference in PFS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.44-1.23; P = .24) or OS (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.49-1.50; P = .60). However, PT significantly reduced the radiation dose for nearly all structures analyzed. The average number of grade 2 or higher toxicities was significantly higher in patients who received IMRT (mean 1.15, range 0-6) compared to PT (mean 0.35, range 0-3; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS In this signal-seeking phase II trial, PT was not associated with a delay in time to cognitive failure but did reduce toxicity and patient-reported fatigue. Larger randomized trials are needed to determine the potential of PT such as dose escalation for GBM and cognitive preservation in patients with lower-grade gliomas with a longer survival time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Diane D Liu
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sarah McAvoy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - David Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Karine Al Feghali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mary-Fran McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amol J Ghia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Erik P Sulman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marta Penas-Prado
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - John F de Groot
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amy B Heimberger
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jihong Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Terri S Armstrong
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Nandita Guha-Thakurta
- Department of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Wefel
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ventz S, Comment L, Louv B, Rahman R, Wen PY, Alexander BM, Trippa L. The Use of External Control Data for Predictions and Futility Interim Analyses in Clinical Trials. Neuro Oncol 2021; 24:247-256. [PMID: 34106270 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE External control data from completed clinical trials and electronic health records can be valuable for the design and analysis of future clinical trials. We discuss the use of external control data for early stopping decisions in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). METHODS We specify interim analyses (IAs) approaches for RCTs, which allow investigators to integrate external data into early futility stopping decisions. IAs utilize predictions based on early data from the RCT, possibly combined with external data. These predictions at IAs express the probability that the trial will generate significant evidence of positive treatment effects. The trial is discontinued if this predictive probability becomes smaller than a pre-specified threshold. We quantify efficiency gains and risks associated with the integration of external data into interim decisions. We then analyze a collection of glioblastoma (GBM) datasets, to investigate if the balance of efficiency gains and risks justify the integration of external data into the IAs of future GBM RCTs. RESULTS Our analyses illustrate the importance of accounting for potential differences between the distributions of prognostic variables in the RCT and in the external data to effectively leverage external data for interim decisions. Using GBM datasets, we estimate that the integration of external data increases the probability of early stopping of ineffective experimental treatments by up to 25% compared to IAs that don't leverage external data. Additionally, we observe a reduction of the probability of early discontinuation for effective experimental treatments, which improves the RCT power. CONCLUSION Leveraging external data for IAs in RCTs can support early stopping decisions and reduce the number of enrolled patients when the experimental treatment is ineffective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffen Ventz
- Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | | | - Bill Louv
- Project Data Sphere, Morrisville, NC
| | - Rifaquat Rahman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Brian M Alexander
- Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA and Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge MA
| | - Lorenzo Trippa
- Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kumar N, Elangovan A, Madan R, Dracham C, Khosla D, Tripathi M, Gupta K, Kapoor R. Impact of Immunohistochemical profiling of Glioblastoma multiforme on clinical outcomes: Real-world scenario in resource limited setting. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2021; 207:106726. [PMID: 34116459 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Intuition into the molecular pathways of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) has changed the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic approaches. We investigated the influence of various clinical and molecular prognostic factors on survival outcomes in radically treated GBM patients. METHODS Medical records of 160 GBM patients treated between January-2012 and December-2018 with surgery followed by post-operative external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with/without temozolomide (TMZ) were reviewed. Immunohistochemical (IHC) assays were performed for IDH1mutation, ATRX loss, TP53 overexpression and Ki-67% index. Apart from disease and treatment-related factors' influence on clinical outcomes, the impact of IHC markers in prognostication was analyzed using appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS The median overall survival (OS) was 14 months. EBRT with concurrent TMZ was given to 60% of patients and 42.5% completed the standard Stupp-protocol. Significant improvements in OS was observed in patients aged ≤ 50years (2-year OS: 22.1% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.001), those who underwent gross total resection (2-year OS: 21.8% vs. 12.8%, p = 0.002), received concurrent TMZ (21.9% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.005), completed the entire Stupp-protocol (2-year OS: 23.4% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.000), and with Ki-67 index <20% (2-year OS: 23.3% vs. 11.6%, p = 0.015). On multivariate analysis, IDH1 mutation, ATRX loss, TP53 expression, and Ki-67 ≤ 20% were significant prognosticators of outcomes. CONCLUSION GBM patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation and those who completed the full Stupp-protocol experienced better survival outcomes. Molecular biology significantly impacts clinical outcomes and plays a key deterministic role in newer management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narendra Kumar
- Department of Radiotherapy& Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
| | - Arun Elangovan
- Department of Radiotherapy& Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
| | - Renu Madan
- Department of Radiotherapy& Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
| | | | - Divya Khosla
- Department of Radiotherapy& Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
| | | | - Kirti Gupta
- Department of Pathology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
| | - Rakesh Kapoor
- Department of Radiotherapy& Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Al Feghali KA, Randall JW, Liu DD, Wefel JS, Brown PD, Grosshans DR, McAvoy SA, Farhat MA, Li J, McGovern SL, McAleer MF, Ghia AJ, Paulino AC, Sulman EP, Penas-Prado M, Wang J, de Groot J, Heimberger AB, Armstrong TS, Gilbert MR, Mahajan A, Guha-Thakurta N, Chung C. Phase II trial of proton therapy versus photon IMRT for GBM: secondary analysis comparison of progression-free survival between RANO versus clinical assessment. Neurooncol Adv 2021; 3:vdab073. [PMID: 34337411 PMCID: PMC8320688 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdab073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This secondary image analysis of a randomized trial of proton radiotherapy (PT) versus photon intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) compares tumor progression based on clinical radiological assessment versus Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO). Methods Eligible patients were enrolled in the randomized trial and had MR imaging at baseline and follow-up beyond 12 weeks from completion of radiotherapy. “Clinical progression” was based on a clinical radiology report of progression and/or change in treatment for progression. Results Of 90 enrolled patients, 66 were evaluable. Median clinical progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.8 (range: 9.4–14.7) months; 10.8 months IMRT versus 11.2 months PT (P = .14). Median RANO-PFS was 8.2 (range: 6.9, 12): 8.9 months IMRT versus 6.6 months PT (P = .24). RANO-PFS was significantly shorter than clinical PFS overall (P = .001) and for both the IMRT (P = .01) and PT (P = .04) groups. There were 31 (46.3%) discrepant cases of which 17 had RANO progression more than a month prior to clinical progression, and 14 had progression by RANO but not clinical criteria. Conclusions Based on this secondary analysis of a trial of PT versus IMRT for glioblastoma, while no difference in PFS was noted relative to treatment technique, RANO criteria identified progression more often and earlier than clinical assessment. This highlights the disconnect between measures of tumor response in clinical trials versus clinical practice. With growing efforts to utilize real-world data and personalized treatment with timely adaptation, there is a growing need to improve the consistency of determining tumor progression within clinical trials and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine A Al Feghali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - James W Randall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Diane D Liu
- Department of Biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Wefel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Department of Neuro-Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - David R Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sarah A McAvoy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Maguy A Farhat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mary F McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amol J Ghia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Erik P Sulman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marta Penas-Prado
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Jihong Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - John de Groot
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amy B Heimberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Terri S Armstrong
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Deciphering the glioblastoma phenotype by computed tomography radiomics. Radiother Oncol 2021; 160:132-139. [PMID: 33984349 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumour which has, despite extensive treatment, a median overall survival of 15 months. Radiomics is the high-throughput extraction of large amounts of image features from radiographic images, which allows capturing the tumour phenotype in 3D and in a non-invasive way. In this study we assess the prognostic value of CT radiomics for overall survival in patients with a GBM. MATERIALS AND METHODS Clinical data and pre-treatment CT images were obtained from 218 patients diagnosed with a GBM via biopsy who underwent radiotherapy +/- temozolomide between 2004 and 2015 treated at three independent institutes (n = 93, 62 and 63). A clinical prognostic score (CPS), a simple radiomics model consisting of volume based score (VPS), a complex radiomics prognostic score (RPS) and a combined clinical and radiomics (C + R)PS model were developed. The population was divided into three risk groups for each prognostic score and respective Kaplan-Meier curves were generated. RESULTS Patient characteristics were broadly comparable. Clinically significant differences were observed with regards to radiation dose, tumour volume and performance status between datasets. Image acquisition parameters differed between institutes. The cross-validated c-indices were moderately discriminative and for the CPS ranged from 0.63 to 0.65; the VPS c-indices ranged between 0.52 and 0.61; the RPS c-indices ranged from 0.57 to 0.64 and the combined clinical and radiomics model resulted in c-indices of 0.59-0.71. CONCLUSION In this study clinical and CT radiomics features were used to predict OS in GBM. Discrimination between low-, middle- and high-risk patients based on the combined clinical and radiomics model was comparable to previous MRI-based models.
Collapse
|
43
|
Chiappini A, Santos AN, DE Trizio I, Croci D, Valci L, Reinert M, Marchi F. Longer survival of glioblastoma complicated by bacterial infections after surgery: what is known today. J Neurosurg Sci 2021; 65:524-531. [PMID: 33940776 DOI: 10.23736/s0390-5616.21.05277-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain tumor in adults with the worst overall survival. Post-craniotomy intracranial infections are not infrequent after surgery, however their impact on overall survival of glioblastoma patients remains unclear. Here we report the case of an unusual longer survival of a glioblastoma patient affected by multiple infections and review the literature on this topic. METHODS PubMed, Embase and Cochrane search engines were reviewed for papers describing outcome of patients suffering from glioblastoma and associated cerebral infections. RESULTS Four papers accounting a total of 29 patients met the eligibility criteria. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis resulted the most common bacteria causing post-craniotomy intracranial infections in brain tumor patients. The overall median survival rate was 18 months ± 18.12 when adding all 29 patients. Only one study described a significant higher survival rate for the infected group. CONCLUSIONS Glioblastoma is the most frequent malignant brain tumor with a very poor outcome/survival. In the literature few cases described an exceptional longer survival often associated with a postoperative infection. To date, the pathophysiology behind this longer survival remains unclear, but it seems that Staphylococcus species could have an influence on the progression of this aggressive brain tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessio Chiappini
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland - .,Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland -
| | - Alejandro N Santos
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ignazio DE Trizio
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Regional Hospital of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Davide Croci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurocenter of the Southern Switzerland, Regional Hospital of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Luca Valci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurocenter of the Southern Switzerland, Regional Hospital of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Michael Reinert
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hirslanden Neurological and Spinal Surgery Center, Klinik St. Anna, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Francesco Marchi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurocenter of the Southern Switzerland, Regional Hospital of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
Background: Recently, miRNA-181a2 could be identified as a major regulator of IDH1 expression in fat tissue. The IDH1 gene, its mutation and expression have a major impact on overall survival in patients with glioblastoma. The presented study aimed to investigate the effect of miRNA-181a2 on IDH1 expression in glioblastoma and on the prognosis of patients suffering from, for example, a tumor. Methods: A total of 74 glioblastoma specimens were analyzed for the expression of miRNA-181a2, acquired as fold change, using qRT-PCR. IDH1 protein expression was estimated via mRNA quantification. Eight post mortal, non-glioma related brain tissue specimens served as the control group. The results were correlated with relevant demographic and clinical aspects of the cohort. A TCGA dataset was used as an independent reference. Results: MiRNA-181a2 was significantly downregulated in tumor samples compared to the control group (p < 0.001). In the glioblastoma cohort, 63/74 (85.1%) showed an IDH1 wild type, while 11/74 (14.9%) patients harbored an IDH 1 mutation. In patients with IDH1 wild type glioblastoma, low miRNA-181a2 expression correlated with a prolonged overall survival (p = 0.019), also verifiable in an independent TCGA dataset. This correlation could not be identified for patients with an IDH1 mutation. MiRNA-181a2 expression tended to correlate inversely with IDH1 protein expression (p = 0.06). Gross total resection of the tumor was an independent marker for a prolonged survival (p = 0.03). Conclusion: MiRNA-181a2 seems to be a promising prognostic marker of selective glioblastoma patients with IDH1 wild type characteristics. This effect may be mediated via direct regulation of IDH1 expression.
Collapse
|
45
|
Li J, Kaneda MM, Ma J, Li M, Shepard RM, Patel K, Koga T, Sarver A, Furnari F, Xu B, Dhawan S, Ning J, Zhu H, Wu A, You G, Jiang T, Venteicher AS, Rich JN, Glass CK, Varner JA, Chen CC. PI3Kγ inhibition suppresses microglia/TAM accumulation in glioblastoma microenvironment to promote exceptional temozolomide response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021; 118:e2009290118. [PMID: 33846242 PMCID: PMC8072253 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2009290118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Precision medicine in oncology leverages clinical observations of exceptional response. Toward an understanding of the molecular features that define this response, we applied an integrated, multiplatform analysis of RNA profiles derived from clinically annotated glioblastoma samples. This analysis suggested that specimens from exceptional responders are characterized by decreased accumulation of microglia/macrophages in the glioblastoma microenvironment. Glioblastoma-associated microglia/macrophages secreted interleukin 11 (IL11) to activate STAT3-MYC signaling in glioblastoma cells. This signaling induced stem cell states that confer enhanced tumorigenicity and resistance to the standard-of-care chemotherapy, temozolomide (TMZ). Targeting a myeloid cell restricted an isoform of phosphoinositide-3-kinase, phosphoinositide-3-kinase gamma isoform (PI3Kγ), by pharmacologic inhibition or genetic inactivation disrupted this signaling axis by reducing microglia/macrophage-associated IL11 secretion in the tumor microenvironment. Mirroring the clinical outcomes of exceptional responders, PI3Kγ inhibition synergistically enhanced the anti-neoplastic effects of TMZ in orthotopic murine glioblastoma models. Moreover, inhibition or genetic inactivation of PI3Kγ in murine glioblastoma models recapitulated expression profiles observed in clinical specimens isolated from exceptional responders. Our results suggest key contributions from tumor-associated microglia/macrophages in exceptional responses and highlight the translational potential for PI3Kγ inhibition as a glioblastoma therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| | - Megan M Kaneda
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037
| | - Jun Ma
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| | - Ming Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| | - Ryan M Shepard
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037
| | - Kunal Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Tomoyuki Koga
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| | - Aaron Sarver
- Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| | - Frank Furnari
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Beibei Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| | - Sanjay Dhawan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| | - Jianfang Ning
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| | - Hua Zhu
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
- Department of Pediatrics, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110122, China
| | - Anhua Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110122, China
| | - Gan You
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China
| | - Tao Jiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China
- Department of Molecular Neuropathology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
| | | | - Jeremy N Rich
- Department of Medicine, Division of Regenerative Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093
| | - Christopher K Glass
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093
| | - Judith A Varner
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92161
| | - Clark C Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455;
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Hirshman BR, Compton J, Carroll KT, Ali MA, Wang SG, Chen CC. Cumulative Intracranial Tumor Volume as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Brain Metastases Undergoing Stereotactic Radiosurgery. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA. SUPPLEMENT 2021; 128:57-69. [PMID: 34191062 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-69217-9_7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Approximately 25-35% of all cancer patients suffer from brain metastases (BM), and many of them-in particular, those with a limited number of intracranial tumors-are treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Accurate prediction of survival remains a key clinical challenge in this population. Several prognostic scales have been developed to facilitate this prognostication, including the Recursive Partitioning Analysis (RPA) classification, the modified Recursive Partitioning Analysis (mRPA) subclassifications, the Basic Score for Brain Metastases (BS-BM), the Score Index for Radiosurgery (SIR), the Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA), and the diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (dsGPA). However, none of these scales include consideration of the cumulative intracranial tumor volume (CITV), which is defined as the sum of all intracranial tumor volumes. Since there is mounting evidence that the CITV carries significant prognostic value in SRS-treated patients with BM, this variable should be considered during survival prognostication, along with other pertinent clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian R Hirshman
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Jason Compton
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Kate T Carroll
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Mir Amaan Ali
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Sonya G Wang
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Clark C Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Navarria P, Pessina F, Franzese C, Loi M, Bellu L, Clerici E, Marco Marzo A, Simonelli M, Lorenzi E, Salvatore Politi L, Bello L, Fornari M, Rossini Z, Santoro A, Scorsetti M. The 70-year-old newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients are older than the 65-year-old? Outcome evaluation of the two categories in a matched case control study with propensity score balancing. Radiother Oncol 2020; 156:49-55. [PMID: 33245946 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.11.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2020] [Revised: 11/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The standard of care for elderly, newly-diagnosed glioblastoma patients consists, if feasible, of surgical resection followed by a short course of radiation therapy (RT) with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy (TMZCHT). To date, the literature lacks of consistence in the definition of elderly, if older than 65 years, or 70 years. Aim of this study was to explore whether differences exist between these two cohorts, comparing outcomes using a propensity score matched analysis (PSM). MATERIALS AND METHODS Two hundred twenty-one elderly newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients were included. All patients received surgery followed by RT with concurrent and adjuvant TMZCHT. The RT dose prescribed was 60 Gy/30 fractions for patients 65-69-year-old or 40.5 Gy/15 fractions for ≥70-year-old. After 1:1 matching there were 86 patients in each group. Distribution of covariates was adequately balanced in the matched data set. RESULTS After PSM median PFS time, 1,2,3-year PFS rates were 10 months, 33.3%, 13.1%, and 6.6% for the 65-69-year group, 9 months, 34.7%, 11% and 4.8% for the ≥70-year group (p = 0.530). Median OS time, and 1,2,3-year OS rates were 14 months, 54.1%, 23.4%, 13.9% for the 65-69-year old group, and 12 months, 49.3%, 21.5%, 10% for the ≥70-year group (p = 0.357). No differences were recorded in relation to different groups of age. CONCLUSIONS The PSM analyses showed a similar outcome in 65-69-year old patients compared to older ones notwithstanding a more burdensome RT schedule. Hypofractionated RT treatment has to be considered also in this group of younger elderly, newly-diagnosed GBM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierina Navarria
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy.
| | - Federico Pessina
- Neurosurgical Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele-Milan, Italy
| | - Ciro Franzese
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele-Milan, Italy
| | - Mauro Loi
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Luisa Bellu
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Elena Clerici
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Antonio Marco Marzo
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Matteo Simonelli
- Oncology and Hematology Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele-Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Lorenzi
- Oncology and Hematology Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Letterio Salvatore Politi
- Neuroradiology Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele-Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Bello
- Oncology and Hemato-oncology Department, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Maurizio Fornari
- Neurosurgical Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Zefferino Rossini
- Neurosurgical Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Armando Santoro
- Oncology and Hematology Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele-Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele-Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Farrell C, Shi W, Bodman A, Olson JJ. Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of emerging developments in the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2020; 150:269-359. [PMID: 33215345 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03607-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
TARGET POPULATION These recommendations apply to adult patients with newly diagnosed or suspected glioblastoma. IMAGING Question What imaging modalities are in development that may be able to provide improvements in diagnosis, and therapeutic guidance for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastoma? RECOMMENDATION Level III: It is suggested that techniques utilizing magnetic resonance imaging for diffusion weighted imaging, and to measure cerebral blood and magnetic spectroscopic resonance imaging of N-acetyl aspartate, choline and the choline to N-acetyl aspartate index to assist in diagnosis and treatment planning in patients with newly diagnosed or suspected glioblastoma. SURGERY Question What new surgical techniques can be used to provide improved tumor definition and resectability to yield better tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastoma? RECOMMENDATIONS Level II: The use of 5-aminolevulinic acid is recommended to improve extent of tumor resection in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Level II: The use of 5-aminolevulinic acid is recommended to improve median survival and 2 year survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients with clinical characteristics suggesting poor prognosis. Level III: It is suggested that, when available, patients be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials assessing the value of diffusion tensor imaging in improving the safety of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma undergoing surgery. NEUROPATHOLOGY Question What new pathology techniques and measurement of biomarkers in tumor tissue can be used to provide improved diagnostic ability, and determination of therapeutic responsiveness and prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas? RECOMMENDATIONS Level II: Assessment of tumor MGMT promoter methylation status is recommended as a significant predictor of a longer progression free survival and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. Level II: Measurement of tumor expression of neuron-glia-2, neurofilament protein, glutamine synthetase and phosphorylated STAT3 is recommended as a predictor of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. Level III: Assessment of tumor IDH1 mutation status is suggested as a predictor of longer progression free survival and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. Level III: Evaluation of tumor expression of Phosphorylated Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase protein, EGFR protein, and Insulin-like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-3 is suggested as a predictor of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. RADIATION Question What radiation therapy techniques are in development that may be used to provide improved tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastomas? RECOMMENDATIONS Level III: It is suggested that patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma undergo pretreatment radio-labeled amino acid tracer positron emission tomography to assess areas at risk for tumor recurrence to assist in radiation treatment planning. Level III: It is suggested that, when available, patients be with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of radiation dose escalation, altered fractionation, or new radiation delivery techniques. CHEMOTHERAPY Question What emerging chemotherapeutic agents or techniques are available to provide better tumor control and prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas? RECOMMENDATION Level III: As no emerging chemotherapeutic agents or techniques were identified in this review that improved tumor control and prognosis it is suggested that, when available, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of chemotherapy. MOLECULAR AND TARGETED THERAPY Question What new targeted therapy agents are available to provide better tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastomas? RECOMMENDATION Level III: As no new molecular and targeted therapies have clearly provided better tumor control and prognosis it is suggested that, when available, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of molecular and targeted therapies IMMUNOTHERAPY: Question What emerging immunotherapeutic agents or techniques are available to provide better tumor control and prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas? RECOMMENDATION Level III: As no immunotherapeutic agents have clearly provided better tumor control and prognosis it is suggested that, when available, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of immunologically-based therapies. NOVEL THERAPIES Question What novel therapies or techniques are in development to provide better tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastomas? RECOMMENDATIONS Level II: The use of tumor-treating fields is recommended for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma who have undergone surgical debulking and completed concurrent chemoradiation without progression of disease at the time of tumor-treating field therapy initiation. Level II: It is suggested that, when available, enrollment in properly designed studies of vector containing herpes simplex thymidine kinase gene and prodrug therapies be considered in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Farrell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Wenyin Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey J Olson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Rades D, Witteler J, Schild SE. Radiotherapy of Grade III Gliomas: Identification of Clinical Prognostic Factors for Local Tumor Control and Survival. In Vivo 2020; 34:3627-3630. [PMID: 33144477 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Revised: 09/06/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM The prognoses of patients with grade III gliomas require improvement, which may be achieved with personalized care. We aimed to identify prognostic factors to facilitate the process of treatment personalization. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eight factors were analyzed for local tumor control and survival in 44 patients irradiated for grade III glioma. These factors included location and size of glioma, number of glioma sites, performance status, gender, age, neurosurgical intervention and chemotherapy. RESULTS In the Cox regression analyses, frontal location (risk ratio=4.41, p=0.048) and unifocal glioma (risk ratio=4.65, p=0.034) were associated with improved local control, and unifocal glioma with improved survival (risk ratio=6.12, p=0.033). In addition, trends for better survival were observed for frontal location (p=0.093), age ≤49 years (p=0.070), upfront resection (p=0.099) and chemotherapy (p=0.066) on univariate analyses. CONCLUSION Independent predictors of local tumor control and survival were identified that can be helpful for personalizing treatment and designing clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Rades
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Jaspar Witteler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Conti Nibali M, Gay LG, Sciortino T, Rossi M, Caroli M, Bello L, Riva M. Surgery for Glioblastoma in Elderly Patients. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2020; 32:137-148. [PMID: 33223022 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2020.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The management of glioblastoma in the elderly population represents a field of growing interest owing a longer life expectancy. In this age group, more than in the young adult, biological age is much more important than chronologic one. The date of birth should not exclude a priori access of treatments. Maximal safe resection is proved to be the first option when performance status and general health is good. Adjuvant therapy and decision about management of recurrence should be choose in a multidisciplinary group according to performance of the patients and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyl-transferase methylation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Conti Nibali
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Via Festa del Perdono 7, Milan 20122, Italy; IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Neurochirurgia Oncologica, Milan, Italy.
| | - Lorenzo G Gay
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Via Festa del Perdono 7, Milan 20122, Italy; IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Neurochirurgia Oncologica, Milan, Italy
| | - Tommaso Sciortino
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Via Festa del Perdono 7, Milan 20122, Italy; IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Neurochirurgia Oncologica, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Rossi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Via Festa del Perdono 7, Milan 20122, Italy; IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Neurochirurgia Oncologica, Milan, Italy
| | - Manuela Caroli
- Unit of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Grande Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Bello
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Via Festa del Perdono 7, Milan 20122, Italy; IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Neurochirurgia Oncologica, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Riva
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Neurochirurgia Oncologica, Milan, Italy; Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Universita` degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, Milan 20122, Italy
| |
Collapse
|