Economic implications of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in treatment of nonresectable colorectal liver metastases. Meta-Analysis Group in Cancer

Evaluation of health economic impact of initial diagnostic modality selection for colorectal cancer liver metastases in suspected patients in China, Japan and the USA

AIMS

To compare cost offsets and contributing factors (false-negative rates and confirmatory imaging requirements, potentially leading to longer waiting times for diagnosis) as well as long-term cost effectiveness associated with the diagnostic and treatment pathways for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) in the US, Japan, and China according to initial imaging modality used. Gadoxetate disodium (ethoxylbenzyl-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) was compared to multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), extracellular contrast media enhanced-MRI (ECCM-MRI) (the US and China only) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Decision tree models were developed to simulate the clinical pathway, from first diagnostic test to initial treatment decision, based on local clinical guidelines and validated by experts. Input data were derived from the literature (up to 31st December 2020) as well as from interviews with local experts. A Markov model extension was built to evaluate the number of false-negative patients and associated costs, over a lifetime horizon.

RESULTS

The decision-tree models showed that, increasing proportionate use of initial EOB-MRI resulted in a cost-offset per patient (excluding false-negative patients) in all countries (USD 201 for the US, JPY 6,284 for Japan and CNY 446 for China) driven by reductions in follow-on diagnostic procedures and unnecessary treatment. The use of EOB-MRI was also associated with a shorter average waiting time to a final diagnosis and treatment decision compared to MDCT, ECCM-MRI and CEUS. The Markov model showed that with an increase in EOB-MRI use, there are fewer false-negative diagnoses over a lifetime horizon. In all three countries, the incremental cost-effectivenes ratio (ICER) was below standard willingness-to-pay thresholds.

CONCLUSION

The findings of these models demonstrate that use of EOB-MRI early in the diagnostic pathway for CRCLM results in short-term cost savings, as well as being cost effective in the long term.

Bias and precision of methods for estimating the difference in restricted mean survival time from an individual patient data meta-analysis

Background

The difference in restricted mean survival time (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ rmstD\left({t}^{\ast}\right) $$\end{document}rmstDt∗), the area between two survival curves up to time horizon \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ {t}^{\ast } $$\end{document}t∗, is often used in cost-effectiveness analyses to estimate the treatment effect in randomized controlled trials. A challenge in individual patient data (IPD) meta-analyses is to account for the trial effect. We aimed at comparing different methods to estimate the \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ rmstD\left({t}^{\ast}\right) $$\end{document}rmstDt∗ from an IPD meta-analysis.

Methods

We compared four methods: the area between Kaplan-Meier curves (experimental vs. control arm) ignoring the trial effect (Naïve Kaplan-Meier); the area between Peto curves computed at quintiles of event times (Peto-quintile); the weighted average of the areas between either trial-specific Kaplan-Meier curves (Pooled Kaplan-Meier) or trial-specific exponential curves (Pooled Exponential). In a simulation study, we varied the between-trial heterogeneity for the baseline hazard and for the treatment effect (possibly correlated), the overall treatment effect, the time horizon \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ {t}^{\ast } $$\end{document}t∗, the number of trials and of patients, the use of fixed or DerSimonian-Laird random effects model, and the proportionality of hazards. We compared the methods in terms of bias, empirical and average standard errors. We used IPD from the Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in Nasopharynx Carcinoma (MAC-NPC) and its updated version MAC-NPC2 for illustration that included respectively 1,975 and 5,028 patients in 11 and 23 comparisons.

Results

The Naïve Kaplan-Meier method was unbiased, whereas the Pooled Exponential and, to a much lesser extent, the Pooled Kaplan-Meier methods showed a bias with non-proportional hazards. The Peto-quintile method underestimated the \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ rmstD\left({t}^{\ast}\right) $$\end{document}rmstDt∗, except with non-proportional hazards at \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ {t}^{\ast } $$\end{document}t∗= 5 years. In the presence of treatment effect heterogeneity, all methods except the Pooled Kaplan-Meier and the Pooled Exponential with DerSimonian-Laird random effects underestimated the standard error of the \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ rmstD\left({t}^{\ast}\right) $$\end{document}rmstDt∗. Overall, the Pooled Kaplan-Meier method with DerSimonian-Laird random effects formed the best compromise in terms of bias and variance. The \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ rmstD\left({t}^{\ast },=,10,\kern0.5em ,\mathrm{years}\right) $$\end{document}rmstDt∗=10years estimated with the Pooled Kaplan-Meier method was 0.49 years (95 % CI: [−0.06;1.03], p = 0.08) when comparing radiotherapy plus chemotherapy vs. radiotherapy alone in the MAC-NPC and 0.59 years (95 % CI: [0.34;0.84], p < 0.0001) in the MAC-NPC2.

Conclusions

We recommend the Pooled Kaplan-Meier method with DerSimonian-Laird random effects to estimate the difference in restricted mean survival time from an individual-patient data meta-analysis.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0137-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Difference in Restricted Mean Survival Time for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Using Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis: Evidence from a Case Study

Objective

In economic evaluation, a commonly used outcome measure for the treatment effect is the between-arm difference in restricted mean survival time (rmstD). This study illustrates how different survival analysis methods can be used to estimate the rmstD for economic evaluation using individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis. Our aim was to study if/how the choice of a method impacts on cost-effectiveness results.

Methods

We used IPD from the Meta-Analysis of Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer concerning 2,000 patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, included in ten trials. We considered methods either used in the field of meta-analysis or in economic evaluation but never applied to assess the rmstD for economic evaluation using IPD meta-analysis. Methods were classified into two approaches. With the first approach, the rmstD is estimated directly as the area between the two pooled survival curves. With the second approach, the rmstD is based on the aggregation of the rmstDs estimated in each trial.

Results

The average incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and acceptability curves were sensitive to the method used to estimate the rmstD. The estimated rmstDs ranged from 1.7 month to 2.5 months, and mean ICERs ranged from € 24,299 to € 34,934 per life-year gained depending on the chosen method. At a ceiling ratio of € 25,000 per life year-gained, the probability of the experimental treatment being cost-effective ranged from 31% to 68%.

Conclusions

This case study suggests that the method chosen to estimate the rmstD from IPD meta-analysis is likely to influence the results of cost-effectiveness analyses.

Surgical treatment of hepatic colorectal metastasis: evolving role in the setting of improving systemic therapies and ablative treatments in the 21st century

Liver resection has clearly been established as the standard treatment for resectable colorectal liver metastases. This article will review the expanding role for hepatectomy in this disease. Faster and safer hepatectomies are allowing combined resections of the primary cancer and synchronous hepatic metastases. Effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as well as increasing data demonstrating effectiveness and safety of combined hepatectomy and ablative therapies, have further expanded the pool of patients now selected for resection. The end result is that increasing numbers of patients are undergoing acceptably aggressive surgical therapies with extension of life and possible cure. Successful multimodality therapies are also now allowing for long-term survival even in patients not cured of cancer. The prolonged survival of most patients treated by hepatectomy has allowed a long-term analysis of the patterns of recurrence, which emphasize the importance of controlling liver disease for prolongation of life. These improvements in treatments for hepatic metastases have come with a precipitous escalation of the costs of care. This will likely require that future clinical trials and algorithms of care not only be based on cancer outcome data but also on value analysis of treatment and follow-up regimens.

Contributions of meta-analyses based on individual patient data to therapeutic progress in colorectal cancer

Meta-analysis is the statistical process of combining information from several studies addressing the same question. Meta-analyses based on individual patient data are far more reliable and informative than those based on summary statistics obtained from the trialists or extracted from the published literature. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials may contribute to therapeutic progress through (1) establishing efficacy benefits beyond a reasonable doubt, (2) identifying sources of heterogeneity between trials, (3) studying subsets reliably, (4) confirming differences in toxicity profiles, (5) evaluating the cost-effectiveness of experimental therapies, (6) assessing surrogate endpoints, and (7) addressing ancillary questions. All of these potential contributions are illustrated with examples in early and advanced colorectal cancer.

Intra-arterial hepatic chemotherapy for unresectable colorectal liver metastases: a review of medical devices complications in 3172 patients

Background

Hepatic artery infusion (HAI) is indicated to treat unresectable colorectal hepatic metastases, with recent applications as a neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment. Traditionally performed with the infusion of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy, it has been now tested with oxaliplatin or irinotecan and associated with systemic chemotherapy.

Methods

To evaluate the impact of medical devices complications we carried out a search of the published studies on HAI in unresectable colorectal liver metastases. Complications were pooled according to the applied medical system: 1) surgical catheter, 2) radiological catheter, and 3) fully implantable pump. The surgical catheter is inserted into the hepatic artery from the gastro-duodenal artery. The radiological catheter is inserted into the hepatic artery through a percutaneous transfemoral or transaxillar access. The fully implantable pump is a totally internal medical device connected to the arterial hepatic catheter during laparotomy.

Results

The selection criteria were met in 47/319 studies. The complications of surgical and radiological medical devices connected to a port were found in 16 and 14 studies respectively. Meanwhile, complications with a fully implantable pump were reported in 17 studies. The total number of complications reported in studies evaluating patients with surgical or radiological catheter were 322 (322/948, 34%) and 261 (261/722, 36.1%) respectively. In studies evaluating patients with a fully implantable pump, the total number of complications was 237 (237/1502, 15.8%). In 18/319 studies the number of cycles was reported. The median number of cycles with surgically and radiologically implanted catheters was 8 and 6 respectively. The fully implantable pump allows a median number of 12 cycles.

Conclusions

The fully implantable pump, maintaining a continuous infusion through the system, allows the lowest risk for thrombosis and infection and the best median number of cycles of loco-regional chemotherapy in HAI.

Diagnosis and treatment of metastatic disease to the liver

A number of cancers present with synchronous or metachronous hepatic metastases. Historically, many of these patients were considered unresectable and were treated with either systemic chemotherapy or supportive care. Today, a variety of options exist for the management of hepatic metastases. Newer agents for systemic therapy continue to be introduced and are providing improved progression-free and overall survival and increased resectability of liver metastases. However, complete surgical resection of isolated hepatic metastases remains the optimal management for these patients. Surgical interventions can be offered to patients with hepatic-only metastases. Hepatic artery chemotherapy represents an adjunct for those patients undergoing resection and can improve survival. This benefit may be even more pronounced when combined with systemic chemotherapy. Newer generation biologic agents can improve results. New therapeutic modalities to treat lesions that are unresectable include ablative techniques such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoablation. This article will examine modalities of diagnosis of hepatic metastases and highlight the data regarding hepatic resection for metastases of several types of primary cancers, the rationale for, and efficacy of, hepatic arterial chemotherapy, in both the postoperative adjuvant setting and in unresectable liver disease, and review the current literature for ablative techniques in the treatment of liver metastases.

Cost considerations in the treatment of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is among the most common malignancies in developed countries. Screening can reduce mortality significantly, although the most appropriate method is still under debate. Observational studies have revealed that lifestyle measures may also be beneficial for prevention of colorectal cancer. Surgery is still the most effective treatment modality for colorectal cancer. The survival benefits of chemotherapy are only modest. For nearly 5 decades, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been the main cytotoxic agent for treatment of colorectal cancer. In the last decade, the new cytotoxic agents raltitrexed, irinotecan and oxaliplatin have been introduced, next to the oral 5-FU analogues capecitabine and tegafur in combination with uracil (UFT). Moreover, the immunotherapeutics bevacizumab and cetuximab have become approved for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. The economic implications of colorectal cancer treatment are substantial. The costs of treatment are mainly attributable to the early and terminal stage of the disease (i.e. surgery, hospitalisation, chemo- and immunotherapy and supportive care). The introduction of new chemo- and immunotherapeutics has caused a continuing increase of treatment expenditures. Therefore, comparative costs and cost effectiveness are important for assessing the value of new treatment regimens. The available study results suggest that addition of irinotecan or oxaliplatin to 5-FU/folinic acid dosage regimens is cost effective. Also, capecitabine is calculated to be cost effective when compared with 5-FU/folinic acid. For UFT, no comparative studies of cost effectiveness were found. Since raltitrexed and 5-FU/folinic acid have shown equal efficacy in terms of survival, cost-effectiveness analysis is considered not to be applicable and cost-minimisation analysis may be sufficient. At present, pharmacoeconomic analyses of combination treatment with the immunotherapeutics bevacizumab or cetuximab are not available, except for recent cost-effectiveness considerations by the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence with negative recommendations for both agents in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Given the high treatment costs, substantial toxicity and relatively limited efficacy of the fast changing chemo- and immunotherapeutic combinations for colorectal cancer, examination of cost-effectiveness studies should be conducted on a routine basis along with determination of clinical benefits.

Liver-directed therapies for patients with primary liver cancer and hepatic metastases

Liver cancer, whether primary or metastatic, is a major cause of death throughout the world. The surgical management of these diseases varies according to the extent of disease and the overall health of the patient. Surgical resection of hepatic disease remains the only chance for cure. However, a large proportion of patients with liver cancer are unable to undergo a complete surgical resection. These patients are often treated with liver-directed therapies. Although not as effective as surgical resection, these approaches can help to improve the survival of patients. In patients with primary liver cancer, underlying liver disease often prohibits surgical intervention. However, survival advantages have been gained with the application of percutaneous alcohol injection and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). In patients with hepatic metastases, the number of metastases is often what prevents surgical resection. In these patients, RFA, cryoablation, and hepatic artery infusional therapy have all aided in prolonging survival. As chemotherapeutic agents improve and targeted therapies are developed, more patients will be able to undergo surgical management of their liver cancer, primary or metastatic.

Colorectal liver metastases: regional chemotherapy via transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and hepatic chemoperfusion: an update

Liver metastasis is one of the main problems encountered in colorectal cancer management as the liver is the most common metastatic site. Several treatment options are available, among which transarterial chemotherapy has proved effective in achieving some local tumour control, improving the quality of life through symptomatic control as well as survival time. The present paper is intended to provide an overview of the techniques, indications and results of regional chemotherapy, which comprises transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and chemoperfusion. This treatment approach has symptomatic, palliative, adjuvant and potentially curative objectives. We reviewed the studies involving TACE and chemoperfusion of colorectal liver metastases during the last few years to update the previous reviews published on this subject. The results achieved were so variable, due to the variations in patient selection criteria and regimens used between the different studies. The median survival ranged from 9 to 62 months and the morphological response ranged from 14 to 76%. Technical aspects, results, and complications of this modality will be demonstrated with a detailed analysis and comments.

Arterial Embolization for Salvage of Hepatic Artery Infusion Pumps

PURPOSE

Hepatic artery infusion pumps (HAIPs) ideally provide for homogenous perfusion of the liver with chemotherapeutic agents. Perfusion of extrahepatic organs or asymmetric liver perfusion (ie, "misperfusion") is diagnosed by nuclear scintigraphy and precludes the use of HAIPs. The purpose of this study is to report experience in salvaging HAIPs with arterial embolization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center HAIP database was retrospectively reviewed for cases from 1999 to 2005 to identify patients who underwent angiography to treat misperfusion documented by nuclear scintigraphy. Patient demographics, nuclear scintigraphic findings before and after embolization, angiographic findings, embolization variables, and outcomes were recorded. Technical success (defined by cessation of flow to the vessel responsible for misperfusion) and clinical success (ie, successful use of the pump) were calculated.

RESULTS

During the study period, 475 HAIPs were implanted. Of those, 43 (9%) had abnormal nuclear scintigraphic findings of misperfusion, but only 32 (7%) had angiographic abnormalities. In eight of 32 cases, hepatic arterial thrombosis and extravasation at the catheter tip were found, which precluded salvage by embolization. In 24 of 32 cases, a vessel presumed responsible for the misperfusion was identified and targeted for embolization. Technical success and clinical success were achieved in 21 of 24 patients (87.5%) and 19 of 24 patients (79%), respectively, who underwent 27 embolization procedures. The three technical failures (12.5%) were the result of inability to catheterize the identified vessel.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous arterial embolization of a vessel to correct misperfusion shown by nuclear scintigraphy is safe and effective. This approach can be expected to result in HAIP salvage in the majority of patients.

Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver at the lahey clinic: comparison between two methods of treatment, surgical versus percutaneous catheter placement

This study updates our experience with hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases at the Lahey Clinic. It compares surgical versus percutaneous catheter methods, employing an external pump. The surgical series (SS) consisted of 58 patients (1970-1995) treated with floxuridine (FUDR), 20 mg/d for 4 to 5 weeks (modified in 1985; 2-week cycles). Percutaneous series (PS) consisted of 42 patients (1976-1995) treated with fluorouracil (5-FU), 20 mg/d for 10 days followed by a floxuridine (FUDR) schedule as with SS. Analysis consisted of tumor response, survival, and toxicity data between the two methods. Response rates showed no significant difference, SS (34%) and PS (48%) (P = 0.22). There were no significant differences in survival from treatment until death in SS (n = 58) of 13 months versus PS (n = 42) of 10.6 months (P = 0.39), from diagnosis until death, SS being 28.4 months versus PS of 26.4 months (P = 0.71) and from metastases until death, SS being 17.4 months versus PS of 22.2 months (P = 0.35). Hepatic toxicity was similar, but there was increased bone marrow toxicity, mucositis, and diarrhea for the PS. Response rates are similar for both our SS and PS and to that reported in recently randomized surgical trials. Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy with FUDR by percutaneous catheter placement may be as effective as surgical catheter placement for colorectal liver metastases, but further study is needed.

Multimodal therapy with intravenous biweekly leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan combined with hepatic arterial infusion pirarubicin in non-resectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer (a European Association for Research in Oncology trial)

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the tolerance and efficacy of combining i.v. irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) with hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of pirarubicin in non-resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients were included in a phase II trial with i.v. irinotecan/5-FU/LV administered every 2 weeks, combined with HAI pirarubicin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 4 weeks. In most cases HAI was administered via a percutaneous catheter.

RESULTS

The main grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia, encountered in 78% of the patients. When all patients were considered in the analysis, tumour response rate was 15 out of 31 [48%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 32% to 65%]. Liver resection was made possible in 11 patients (35%; 95% CI 21% to 53%). There were no toxic death. Median overall survival was 20.5 months, and median progression-free survival was 9.1 months. In patients with completely resected metastases, median overall survival was not reached and median progression-free survival was 20.2 months.

CONCLUSION

The multimodality approach used in the present study was well-tolerated and yielded dramatic responses. An aggressive approach combining i.v. and HAI chemotherapy deserves further investigation.

An update on hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for colorectal cancer

Hepatic metastases are a frequent complication of colorectal cancer (CRC), affecting over half of all CRC patients. Resection of isolated metastases can result in long-term survival, but the majority of patients relapse, and most have unresectable disease. Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy delivers high concentrations of cytotoxic agents directly to liver metastases with minimal systemic toxicities. Advances in surgical techniques, development of fully implantable pumps, and modification of drug regimens have decreased complications and improved patient tolerability. Randomized trials comparing HAI with systemic chemotherapy have demonstrated superior response rates and times to hepatic progression for unresectable disease, and have shown better times to progression and overall survival rates in the adjuvant setting following hepatic resection. HAI chemotherapy has unique toxicities, including chemical hepatitis and biliary sclerosis, which can be mitigated by the addition of dexamethasone to therapy. In an attempt to prevent extrahepatic progression, combinations of HAI with systemic chemotherapy, including newer agents such as irinotecan and oxaliplatin, are currently being investigated, with promising early results.

Management of Colorectal Cancer in Elderly Patients

The treatment of colorectal cancer has evolved dramatically over the last 15 years. Advances in surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy have enabled oncologists to cure more patients and offer improved quality of life to patients not amenable to cure. Specific knowledge of colorectal cancer care of the elderly, while lagging behind the treatment of younger patients, is beginning to emerge. Informed by recent trials, the approach towards elderly patients is shifting towards more aggressive treatment and multimodal therapy. Surgeons are operating on the elderly with greater frequency, less operative mortality and greater success; 5-year survival following potentially curative surgery has risen from 50% to 67%.Research of adjunctive therapy for colorectal cancer is enrolling more elderly patients, and with this has come an understanding of the role of chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of the elderly, used individually and within multi-drug regimens. This research offers insight into how the elderly respond to chemotherapy, informing clinicians on anticipated benefits and toxicities of treatment. Fluorouracil-based regimens, which have long been the standard adjuvant chemotherapy, have been shown to offer benefits to the elderly compared with those not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (71% versus 64% 5-year survival), and to cause similar toxicities as seen in younger patients. The role of novel chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of elderly patients with colorectal cancer is also emerging, with studies finding that irinotecan, in combination with a fluorouracil-based regimen, can offer a further survival benefit of over 2 months compared with fluorouracil alone. While newer agents such as capecitabine, oxaliplatin, raltitrexed and tegafur/uracil (UFT) have been focused upon by clinical researchers, data on their use in the elderly remain unconvincing. Not only are we approaching a clearer understanding of the effectiveness of cancer care among the elderly, but research is also beginning to identify the cost effectiveness of both standard and emerging chemotherapeutic agents. Cost effectiveness of fluorouracil-based regimens, depending on delivery strategy, use of modulating agents and stage of cancer vary from US dollars 2000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) to US dollars 20200 per QALY (1992 values). Irinotecan therapy has not been fully investigated from the perspective of cost effectiveness; the figure of US dollars 10000 per QALY (1998 values) for irinotecan monotherapy over fluorouracil regimens is likely an underestimate, while cost analysis of irinotecan and fluorouracil combination therapy has not yet been reported. Our understanding of cost effectiveness of other novel agents has lagged behind; further research on these agents is needed. Nonetheless, as the effects of these novel agents upon both outcomes and costs continue to be defined, both curative and palliative treatment of colorectal cancer in the elderly patient will become more sophisticated and effective.

J-tipped guidewire as a target for puncture of the subclavian artery in the placement of a reservoir port and catheter system

The aim of this study was to verify the feasibility of using a J-tipped guidewire as a target for puncture of the subclavian artery in the placement of a reservoir port and catheter system (RPCS). Twenty-five patients with various hepatic malignancies underwent percutaneous implantation of an RPCS through the left subclavian artery for regional chemotherapy. To successfully puncture the left subclavian artery, a J-tipped guidewire was used as a target with fluoroscopic guidance. Technical success and complication rates, and numbers of puncture failures, were retrospectively analyzed. Implantation of the RPCS was successful in all patients. Eight (32%) patients had minor complications and no patient had major complications. The number of puncture failures per patient was 0 to 1 (mean=0.32). The J-tipped guidewire is a safe and appropriate target for puncture of the subclavian artery in the placement of an RPCS.

Hepatic arterial infusion using pirarubicin combined with systemic chemotherapy: a phase II study in patients with nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

A prospective phase II study was performed to determine the feasibility, efficacy and safety of arterial hepatic infusion (HAI) using pirarubicin combined with intravenous chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From December 1991 to April 1994, 75 patients with unresectable colorectal metastases confined to the liver were included in this multicenter study to receive intra-arterial hepatic pirarubicin and a systemic monthly regimen of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid. Sixty-four patients were analyzed in the intention-to-treat analysis and 61 in the per-protocol analysis.

RESULTS

Tolerance of this regimen was rather good; however, functional catheter problems were observed in 29 patients (45%) resulting in failure of HAI in 21 cases (33%) after a median of three cycles; vomiting grade 3 was present in 12.5% of patients, neutropenia grade 4 in 23% and alopecia grade 3 in 19%. The overall response rate was 31.9% in intention-to-treat analysis, and 39.3% in per-protocol analysis. Extrahepatic progression was reported in only 21.7% of patients. Time to hepatic progression and extra-hepatic progression was 8.3 and 15 months, respectively, in intention-to-treat analysis, and 11 and 18 months, respectively, in per-protocol analysis. Median survival was 19 and 20 months in intention-to-treat analysis and per-protocol, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, the combination of intra-arterial pirarubicin and intravenous chemotherapy demonstrated some efficacy and good tolerance in the treatment of isolated colorectal liver metastases. This treatment seems to prevent extra-hepatic spread and prolong survival time. The results of this study have to be confirmed by new trials using more active systemic chemotherapy.

Quality of life in patients with colorectal metastasis and intrahepatic chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Liver metastasis from colorectal cancer remains an oncological challenge. Hepatic chemotherapy has been used; however, rigorous quality of life (QOL) measurements are lacking. The aim of this study was to describe unique QOL issues to formulate a specific tool for this population.

METHODS

A purposive sample was identified of patients treated with intrahepatic chemotherapy. Consenting patients completed a demographic tool and the City of Hope QOL Scale/Cancer Patient survey. An in-depth interview on QOL concerns was conducted, taped, and transcribed verbatim. The data from the interviews were coded to identify recurrent themes.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients participated. Physical well-being was maintained. Significantly lower subscale scores were noted for psychological, social, and spiritual domains compared with nonpatient norms (City of Hope volunteers; n = 169). Patients found intrahepatic chemotherapy convenient but were unable to pursue vigorous activity, and their sleep habits changed. Psychologically, patients felt reassured to receive specific therapy to their liver.

CONCLUSIONS

Pilot evaluation of QOL in this population revealed changes in physical, psychological, social, and spiritual dimensions. Both disease- and treatment-specific concerns were identified, and the results provide evidence for items to include in a QOL questionnaire specific to this population.

Screening, prevention and socioeconomic costs associated with the treatment of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC), the third most prevalent cancer worldwide, imposes a significant economic and humanistic burden on patients and society. One study conservatively estimated the annual expenditures for colorectal cancer to be approximately dollars US 5.3 billion in 2000, including both direct and indirect costs. However, other investigators estimated inpatient costs alone incurred in the US in 1994 to be around dollars US 5.14 billion. Therefore, the economic burden of colorectal cancer in the US could be projected to be somewhere in the range of dollars US 5.5-6.5 billion by considering that inpatient costs approximate 80% of total direct costs. No worldwide data have been published, but assuming that the US represents 25-40% of total expenditures in oncology, as seen for breast and lung cancers, a rough estimate for colorectal cancer would be in the range of dollars US 14-22 billion. Screening helps increase patient survival by diagnosing colorectal cancer early. The ideal method among the four tests most used (faecal occult blood test, flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy and double contrast barium enema) has not been identified. Economic studies of colorectal cancer screening are complex because of the many variables involved, as well as the fact that the outcomes must be followed for many years, and the lack of consensus on screening guidelines. Intuitively, modelling colorectal cancer is one way to overcome these hurdles; published modelling studies predict colorectal cancer screening programs to be within the threshold of dollars US 40000 per life-year saved. The faecal occult blood test appears to be the only clearly effective test, both from a clinical and an economic viewpoint. Important limitations are the invasiveness and inconvenience of the screening procedures, except faecal occult blood test. Patients' comfort and satisfaction are essential in improving compliance with screening recommendations, which appears to be low even in the US (35% of the general population aged over 40 years and 60% of the high-risk population), the country with the highest awareness and compliance in the world. Since colorectal cancer is generally a disease of the elderly, its economic burden is expected to grow in the near future, mainly due to population aging. Potential avenues to pursue in order to contain or reduce the economic burden of colorectal cancer would be the design and implementation of efficient screening programmes, the improvement of patient awareness and compliance with screening guidelines, the development of appropriate prevention programs (i.e. primary and secondary), and earlier diagnosis.

Hepatic artery chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases: technical considerations and review of clinical trials

Hepatic artery infusion (HAI) of chemotherapeutic agents for colorectal hepatic metastases is associated with significantly higher response rates compared to systemic chemotherapy. However, response rates have not consistently translated into improved survival. Several randomized trials have evaluated the implantable pump for treating unresectable colorectal hepatic metastases. Meta-analysis of these studies have demonstrated an improved survival advantage with pump therapy as well as improved quality of life. Recent studies of HAI of chemotherapy as adjuvant therapy following liver metastases resection have also demonstrated a potential survival advantage. Toxicities of HAI can be treatment limiting, but measures have emerged for overcoming these side effects. These randomized clinical trials have established HAI as a reasonable therapeutic option in patients with unresectable disease, and as adjuvant therapy in patients with resectable disease.

Intrahepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy: clinical results

Approximately 60% of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) will go on to develop hepatic metastases. Although surgical resection is the only curative modality, a majority will not be able to undergo surgery. Alternative methods for treating this population have focused on the feasibility of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of chemotherapy. Randomized data in this field have been hampered due to small numbers of patients in some trials, or crossover between groups. However, most trials have suggested an improvement in both overall and progression-free survival with HAI therapy. Dose-limiting toxicity associated with HAI is related to hepatobiliary sclerosis, which has been reduced with the use of dexamethasone as part of the treatment. Current research is underway to improve the rate of extrahepatic metastases in patients undergoing HAI.

Combined regional and systemic chemotherapy by a mini-invasive approach for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases

From February 1996 to December 1998, 95 patients affected with colorectal liver metastases underwent the positioning of an intraarterial hepatic catheter by a transcutaneous subclavian access, under local anesthesia. All patients were evaluated for catheter implantation complications. Moreover, 61 patients of 95 treated at our center were retrospectively evaluated for results of chemotherapy performed with two different schedules of hepatic artery infusion (HAI) combined with systemic chemotherapy (SC). Eleven patients (group A) were treated with combined SC (5-fluorouracil continuous infusion) and HAI (floxuridine). A subsequent 50 patients underwent HAI (floxuridine, 4 cycles) followed, if a response or stable disease were observed, by combined SC and HAI (group B). Three cases of aneurysm of subclavian artery occurred, which were treated by the positioning of a radiologic arterial stent and the reimplantation of the catheter by a femoral access. Thrombosis of the hepatic artery was registered in four cases. We observed 10.5% occurrence of dislocation of the catheter, which was always moved again in the hepatic artery. In group A, with 45% clinical objective response rate and 10% stable disease rate, median survival time and median time to extrahepatic progression were 9 and 6 months, respectively. In group B, we observed 44% clinical objective responses and 26% stable disease after HAI. Patients without disease progression and therefore submitted to sequential SC and HAI had a median survival time of 21 months and a median time to extrahepatic progression of 16 months. The development of the mini-invasive technique of implantation of an arterial port can avoid laparotomy for HAI. Percutaneous implantation of an arterial port has a low rate of technical complications. HAI followed by combined systemic and regional chemotherapy has good results in terms of survival and time to extrahepatic progression.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of hepatic arterial infusion with oxaliplatin in combination with folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil in patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

To determine dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetics (PK) of oxaliplatin administered as hepatic arterial infusion.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with isolated hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer were treated every three weeks with increasing doses of oxaliplatin (4 hours; starting dose 25 mg/m2, escalation in steps of 25 mg/m2) in combination with folinic acid (1 hour, 200 mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (2 hour, 600 mg/m2).

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (median age, 61 years) have been entered all of whom are fully evaluable. The DLT has been observed at dose level 6, i.e., at 150 mg/m2/cycle and consisted of leucopenia, obliteration of the hepatic artery, and acute pancreatitis. Overall, toxicity mainly consisted of nausea/vomiting (16 of 21 patients), anemia (16 of 21), upper abdominal pain (15 of 21), sensory neuropathy (10 of 21), diarrhea (9 of 21), and thrombocytopenia (9 of 21). The mean PK parameters were: terminal half-life of ultrafiltrable platin, 17.75 +/- 9.29 hours; renal elimination, 48.7% +/- 14.1% of the applied dose; renal clearance 135.55 +/- 45.32 ml/min. The mean area under the plasma-concentration curve (AUC) increased linearly from 3.22 +/- 0.61 microg x h/ml to 18.45 +/- 8.90 microg x h/ml through the first five dose levels (P = 0.0004). Ten of eighteen evaluable patients achieved a complete or partial response (59%).

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended dose for phase II studies is 125 mg/m2 oxaliplatin.

The role of meta-analyses in assessing cancer treatments

The results of individual phase III cancer clinical trials are often inconclusive due to the overly optimistic size of treatment differences that are sought. Increased power and precision can generally be obtained if the data from several different trials studying the same or similar questions are analysed together. Individual patient data meta-analyses, which combine together the quantitative results from all properly randomised studies, provide an overall estimate of the size of treatment differences. Individual patient data meta-analyses have played an especially important role in breast and gastrointestinal tract cancers where many important questions have been addressed. Although meta-analyses have been subject to considerable criticism, individual patient data meta-analyses provide the best overall evidence of treatment effect in the absence of large-scale trials and have been instrumental in providing objective data that can be used in the design of new studies.

Recent meta-analyses in colorectal cancer

Meta-analyses play an important role in the current emergence of evidence-based medicine. This paper reviews the meta-analyses reported in the past 3 years in colorectal cancer, from a clinical as well as a statistical perspective. The usefulness of meta-analyses in our understanding and management of colorectal cancer is highlighted for screening, risk of colorectal cancer occurrence, outcome of colorectal cancer, adjuvant treatment, follow-up, and treatment of advanced disease.

Survival after percutaneous, image-guided, thermal ablation of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

One-year, two-year, three-year, and four-year survival rates and median survival time for patients with inoperable liver metastases from colorectal cancer is 32, 10, and 3 percent and 7.4 to 11 months, respectively. Systemic chemotherapy produces a modest improvement to 48, 21, and 3 percent and 12 months, respectively. Regional chemotherapy produces a further improvement to 64, 25, and 5 percent and 15 to 17 months, respectively. For those with operable disease, hepatic resection survival rates are 90, 62, 48, and 40 percent, respectively, and survival time is 33 months. Thermal ablation is effective in producing necrosis in liver metastases. We report the impact on survival in 69 patients treated from 1993 to 1997, with follow-up to 1998.

METHODS

Sixty-nine patients, 50 male, mean age 60 (range, 33-87) years were treated. Liver resection was not feasible because of disease extent in the liver, extrahepatic disease or concurrent medical conditions. The average number of liver metastases was 2.9 (range, 1-16), the mean maximal diameter was 3.9 (range, 1-8) cm, and the mean initial total liver tumor volume was 47 (range, 1-371) ml. Eighteen (26 percent) had undergone previous hepatic resection. Sixty-two of 67 (93 percent) received chemotherapy at some stage. Twenty (29 percent) had extrahepatic disease.

RESULTS

One-year, two-year, three-year, and four-year survival rates and median survival time from liver metastasis diagnosis was 90, 60, 34, and 22 percent and 27 months, respectively. Forty of 69 (58 percent) developed new liver metastases, and 23 of 69 (33 percent) developed new extrahepatic disease. Of a subgroup of 24 patients with less than four metastases, <5 cm diameter, treated after January 1995, the median survival time was 33 months from first thermal ablation vs. 15 months for the remainder (P = 0.0004). Major morbidity occurred in 3.2 percent, minor morbidity occurred in 12 percent, and there was one periprocedural death.

CONCLUSIONS

Thermal ablation therapy improves survival in patients with inoperable but limited liver metastases. This is an improvement on the natural history of the disease and published chemotherapy results. Recent and ongoing technical refinements, not reflected in these results, are expected to further improve survival.

Survival impact of chemotherapy in patients with colorectal metastases confined to the liver: a re-analysis of 1458 non-operable patients randomised in 22 trials and 4 meta-analyses. Meta-Analysis Group in Cancer

BACKGROUND

Metastases confined to the liver is a frequent situation in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. For non-operable patients, 5-FU-based chemotherapy is often proposed but the importance of the choice of first line 5-FU regimen remains debatable.

DESIGN

In four previously performed meta-analyses, our group had compared bolus intravenous fluoropyrimidines (bolus FU group) with experimental fluoropyrimidines (experimental FU group), consisting of 5-FU plus leucovorin, 5-FU plus methotrexate, continuous infusion 5-FU, or hepaticartery infusion FUDR. We re-analysed this data set to focus on 1458 patients with non-operable colorectal metastases confined to the liver, randomised in 22 trials. All analyses were stratified by trial and used individual patient data.

RESULTS

Median survival times were 11.3 months in the bolus FU group (95% CI: 10.5-12.0 months) compared to 12.7 months in the experimental FU group (95% CI: 120-13.1 months). This difference, although clinically small, was statistically significant, with an overall survival hazard ratio of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.79-0.99, P = 0.037). In a multivariate analysis, performance status was the only significant predictor of survival (P < 10(-4)), whereas the statistical significance of allocated treatment was borderline (P = 0.058).

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome of patient with non-operable colorectal metastases confined to the liver is poor, and mainly driven by their initial performance status. Experimental chemotherapy schedules yield a small improvement in their overall survival, indicating the importance of the choice of first-line chemotherapy.

Current treatment for colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver

Surgery is currently the only available treatment option which offers the potential for cure for patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Of those who undergo a potentially curative operation for their primary tumour but subsequently recur, almost 80% will develop evidence of metastatic disease within the liver. Greater experience and improvements in technique in liver surgery, with an increasingly aggressive surgical approach to metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver, has resulted in prolonged disease-free survival with 5-year rates varying from 21% to 48%. In order to increase these numbers further and to treat patients not eligible for surgical therapy, new treatment modalities and strategies have been developed. This review presents an update of the current treatment for colorectal disease metastatic to the liver.

Transcatheter embolization for the treatment of misperfusion after hepatic artery chemoinfusion pump implantation

BACKGROUND

The use of surgically implanted chemoinfusion pumps for the treatment of hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma can be complicated by intra- or extrahepatic misperfusion. This may result in suboptimal tumor exposure to the chemotherapeutic agent and injury to other gastrointestinal organs. Misperfusion can be managed by selective arterial transcatheter embolization.

METHODS

Between 1989 and 1996, 16 patients with liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma and with hepatic artery chemoinfusion pump misperfusion were treated using transcatheter coil embolization. Six female and 10 male patients (age range, 34-84 years; median, 51.5 years) were identified by retrospective review of the records of the Department of Interventional Radiology. After pump placement, abnormal liver perfusion scan or methylene blue endoscopy study results prompted angiography with coil embolization. After embolization, the imaging studies were repeated and patients were monitored in the Oncology Clinic.

RESULTS

Eight patients exhibited intrahepatic misperfusion (group 1) and eight extrahepatic misperfusion (group 2). Coil embolization was immediately successful in 100% of patients in group 1, with restoration of normal hepatic perfusion, and in 75% in group 2. There were no immediate procedure-related complications. Follow-up periods ranged from 1 to 23 months (median, 13.5 months). Embolization was unsuccessful for two patients (in group 2), who tolerated a modified chemotherapeutic regimen, with follow-up periods of 18.5 and 22 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Transcatheter coil embolization is the therapy of choice for the management of hepatic artery chemoinfusion pump misperfusion. It is rapid, effective, and well tolerated by patients and obviates the need for additional surgical intervention.