Re: prediction of carboplatin clearance from standard morphological and biological patient characteristics

Evaluation of creatinine-based formulas in dosing adjustment of cancer drugs other than carboplatin

Background. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is often used to determine initial dosing of renally excreted cancer drugs. GFR can be calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) or the modified diet in renal diseases (MDRD) study formulas, both of which are based on serum creatinine levels. The MDRD formula is more accurate in noncancer patients, does not require patient weight, and is reported automatically by all laboratories in British Columbia, Canada. We previously showed that the CG and MDRD formulas have similar accuracy for carboplatin dosing in patients with gynecological malignancies. We now examine dosing of all renally excreted cancer drugs in the general cancer population. Since this setting does not include routine measurement of GFR, we report the concordance of estimates of GFR derived from the CG and MDRD formulas.

Methods. Patient data were collected retrospectively at the BC Cancer Agency. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who would have received a different initial dose due to difference in the GFR. Each patient’s dose was determined from dose adjustment tables stated in specific treatment protocols. The secondary outcome was concordance of the GFR derived from CG and MDRD, using the method of Bland and Altman. A difference of >30% was assumed to be clinically significant because this difference would usually lead to dose adjustment based on reclassification of renal function.

Results. A total of 313 patients were evaluated, with 40% male. The median age was 56 years, weight 67.5 kg, height 166 cm, and serum creatinine 74 µmol/L (0.84 mg/dL). The median GFR derived from the CG and MDRD formulas were 86.8 mL/min (mean 91 mL/min, SD ± 30 mL/min) and 87.6 mL/min (mean 88 mL/min, SD ± 26 mL/min), respectively. A total of 8.6% (27/313) of patients would have received a different dose due to difference in the GFR; of these, 67% (18/27) would have received a higher dose. A difference of >30% in GFR was found in 17.9% (56/313) of patients.

Conclusions. There is good concordance of the GFR derived from the CG and MDRD formulas for most cancer patients, with less than 10% of patients expected to receive a different initial dose of chemotherapy. The MDRD formula may be a reasonable alternative to the CG formula for dosing of cancer drugs which are renally excreted or nephrotoxic. J Oncol Pharm Practice (2010) 16: 113—119.

A phase I study and pharmacologic evaluation of irinotecan and carboplatin for patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma who previously received platinum-containing chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The objectives of the current study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of irinotecan and carboplatin in combination, to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma who previously received platinum-containing chemotherapy, and to examine the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of both drugs by using the Chatelut formula.

METHODS

Patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma who previously received platinum-containing chemotherapy were treated with a combination of irinotecan and carboplatin. Carboplatin was administered as a 60-minute intravenous infusion on Day 1 and was followed by irinotecan, which was administered as a 90-minute intravenous infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15. Six dose levels of irinotecan (in mg/m(2))/carboplatin (mg . mL/min) were planned: 50 mg/m(2)/4 mg . mL/minute, 60 mg/m(2)/4 mg . mL/minute, 50 mg/m(2)/5 mg . mL/minute, 60 mg/m(2)/5 mg . mL/minute, 50 mg/m(2)/6 mg . mL/minute, and 60 mg/m(2)/6 mg . mL/minute. The carboplatin dosage was calculated by using the Chatelut formula. Treatment was repeated at 28-day intervals.

RESULTS

In total, 19 patients in cohorts of 3 to 5 patients received irinotecan and carboplatin at 5 dose levels. The dose-limiting toxicities were Grade 4 neutropenia and Grade 4 thrombocytopenia. The MTD of the irinotecan/carboplatin combination was 60 mg/m(2)/5 . mg mL/minute. Partial responses were observed at higher dose levels. Pharmacologic studies demonstrated that administration of the dosage estimated with the Chatelut formula instead of the Chatelut formula with adjustment for serum creatinine resulted in a slightly excessive dose of carboplatin.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended dose for the Phase II study was irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8, and 15 with carboplatin 5 mg/mL . minute on Day 1 repeated every 4 weeks.

Pharmacology of anticancer drugs in the elderly population

Modifications to bodily functions and physiology are known to occur with age. These changes can have a considerable impact on the pharmacokinetic processes of absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion and the pharmacodynamic properties of administered drugs. For many drugs with a high therapeutic index, this will be clinically unimportant, but for anticancer drugs, which usually have a low therapeutic index, these pharmacological changes can lead to dramatic consequences, such as excessive drug concentrations and unacceptable toxicity, or subtherapeutic drug concentrations and ineffective treatment. Despite the increased susceptibility of the elderly to these changes, doses are rarely adapted on the basis of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, with the exception of changes secondary to altered renal function. Until recently, only a few large prospective randomised trials have provided evidence-based data for dose adaptations in elderly patients. However, with increasing knowledge of the pharmacokinetics of anticancer drugs, advances in the knowledge of pharmacokinetic behaviour with aging, and documented efficacy and toxicity data in the elderly population, it is possible to highlight aspects of prescribing anticancer drugs in the elderly. In general, and for most drugs, age itself is not a contraindication to full-dose chemotherapy. The main limiting factors are comorbidity and poor functional status, which may be present in a significant number of the elderly population. Elderly patients with cancer are part of the daily practice of oncologists, but currently clinicians can often only estimate whether dose modification is advantageous for the elderly. This review attempts to elucidate the factors that can influence the pharmacokinetics of anticancer drugs frequently used in the elderly, and the clinical or biochemical parameters that form the basis for dose adjustments with age.

Association between expression of the MRP3 gene and exposure to platinum drugs in lung cancer

To investigate the roles played by the multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP1) homologues MRP3 and MRP4 in resistance to platinum drugs, we examined steady-state levels of mRNA for both MRP3 and MRP4 in normal lung and lung cancer specimens as well as peripheral mononuclear cells (PMN) after platinum drug exposure. MRP3 and MRP4 gene expression levels were monitored in the PMN of 10 previously untreated lung cancer patients within 24 hr after carboplatin (CBDCA) administration. Expression levels for both genes were also examined in 80 autopsy samples (40 primary tumors and 40 corresponding normal lung tissues) from 40 patients with lung cancer. MRP3 and MRP4 gene expression levels were assessed by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. MRP3 expression levels in the PMN rose rapidly within 24 hr after administration of CBDCA, whereas MRP4 expression levels remained the same. Furthermore, MRP3 expression levels in normal lung and tumor tissues from autopsy samples that had been exposed to platinum drugs while the patients were alive were significantly higher than those in unexposed tissues, but again MRP4 expression levels remained the same. These results suggest that platinum drugs and/or the physiological stress response to xenobiotics induce expression of the MRP3 gene.

Pharmacokinetically guided administration of chemotherapeutic agents

The current practice for the dose calculation of most anticancer agents is based on body surface area in m2, although lower interpatient variation in pharmacokinetic parameters has been reported with pharmacokinetically guided administration. As chemotherapeutic agents have a narrow therapeutic window, pharmacokinetically guided administration may lead to less toxicity and higher efficacy than administration on the basis of body surface area. Pharmacokinetically guided administration, using parameters such as area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), steady-state plasma drug concentration and drug exposure time above a certain plasma concentration, has been studied for many antineoplastic agents. Assessment of pharmacokinetic profiles allows the characterisation of relationships between pharmacokinetic parameters and efficacy and toxicity. AUC appears to be more closely correlated with pharmacodynamics than does the dose per unit of body surface area. In particular, the AUC-guided administration of carboplatin has been extensively studied, based on the close relationship between the renal clearance of the drug and glomerular filtration rate. Several formulae and limited sampling models have been derived to predict the AUC of carboplatin. The relationship between AUC and pharmacodynamics has also been studied for other anticancer agents, for example fluorouracil, topotecan, etoposide, cisplatin and busulfan, but all less extensively than for carboplatin. The pharmacokinetically guided administration of these agents needs to be investigated further before the use of alternative administration formulae can become standard clinical practice. Prospective studies of pharmacokinetically guided versus surface area-based administration should be performed to validate pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships and to facilitate optimal dosage of anticancer agents in the clinic.

Increased expression of the MRP5 gene is associated with exposure to platinum drugs in lung cancer

To investigate the role of the multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP1) homologue MRP5 in relation to platinum drug resistance, we examined the steady-state levels of the mRNAs for MRP5 in both lung cancer cell lines and peripheral mononuclear cells (PMN) after exposure to platinum drug and in normal lung and lung cancer tissue specimens. Firstly, we examined MRP5 gene expression levels in 80 autopsy samples (40 primary tumors and 40 corresponding normal lung tissues) from 40 patients who had died from lung cancer. Next, we monitored MRP5 gene expression levels within 24 hr in both lung cancer cell lines incubated with cisplatin and in PMN from 10 previously untreated lung cancer patients after carboplatin administration alone. The MRP5 gene expression levels were assessed by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction or RNase protection assay. The MRP5 expression levels in normal lung tissues and in tumors from patients exposed to platinum drugs during their lifetime were significantly higher than those in tissues from non-exposed patients. On the other hand, the MRP5 expression levels were not rapidly induced by platinum drugs either in lung cancer cell lines or in PMN within 24 hr. Our results suggest that increased expression levels of the MRP5 gene are associated with exposure to platinum drugs in lung cancer in vivo and/or the chronic stress response to xenobiotics.

Induction of gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase gene expression by platinum drugs in peripheral mononuclear cells of lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

To investigate in vivo the roles of gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase (gamma-GCS), multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP), human canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter (cMOAT) and DNA topoisomerase I (topo I) in relation to platinum drug resistance, we monitored the changes of the steady-state levels of the mRNAs for these factors in peripheral mononuclear cells (PMN) after completing platinum drug administration.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PMN from 46 subjects were studied. We obtained PMN from 14 previously untreated lung cancer patients and 14 normal volunteers to measure the baseline gene expression levels. We then obtained PMN from 18 patients with previously untreated advanced lung cancer before and after they received platinum drug treatment. We analyzed the gene expression levels by using the quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

RESULTS

There were no differences in the baseline expression levels between normal volunteers and lung cancer patients in any of the genes. After platinum drug administration, the heavy subunit of gamma-GCS (gamma-GCSh) expression level increased 2.5-fold within 24 hours and the increase persisted for a month, whereas the light subunit of gamma-GCS (gamma-GCSl) expression level did not show an early response but had increased after a month. By contrast, the MRP, cMOAT and topo I expression levels were similar before, during and after chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the gene expression levels of both subunits of gamma-GCS play an important in vivo role in platinum drug resistance.