Changes in methylation-based aging in women who do and do not develop breast cancer

Chemotherapy-induced acceleration of DNA methylation-based biological age in breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in women and is often treated with chemotherapy. Although previous studies have demonstrated increasing biological age in patients who receive chemotherapy, evaluation of this association with DNA methylation-based markers of biological ageing may provide novel insight into the role of chemotherapy on the ageing process. We therefore sought to investigate the association between chemotherapy and markers of biological ageing as estimated from DNA methylation in women with breast cancer. DNA methylation profiling was performed on peripheral blood collected from 18 patients before and after the first cycle of chemotherapy using the Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip. Six markers of biological age acceleration were estimated from DNA methylation levels. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between each metric of biological age acceleration and chemotherapy. After adjusting for chronological age and race, intrinsic epigenetic age acceleration (p = 0.041), extrinsic epigenetic age acceleration (p = 0.050), PhenoAge acceleration (p = 0.001), GrimAge acceleration (p < 0.001), and DunedinPACE (p = 0.006) were significantly higher and telomere length (p = 0.027) was significantly lower following the first cycle of chemotherapy compared to before treatment initiation. These results demonstrate greater biological ageing as estimated from DNA methylation following chemotherapy in women with breast cancer. Our findings illustrate that cytotoxic therapies may modulate the ageing process among breast cancer patients and may also have implications for age-related health conditions in cancer survivors.

Current evidence supporting associations of DNA methylation measurements with survivorship burdens in cancer survivors: A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Identifying reliable biomarkers that reflect cancer survivorship symptoms remains a challenge for researchers. DNA methylation (DNAm) measurements reflecting epigenetic changes caused by anti-cancer therapy may provide needed insights. Given lack of consensus describing utilization of DNAm data to predict survivorship issues, a review evaluating the current landscape is warranted.

OBJECTIVE

Provide an overview of current studies examining associations of DNAm with survivorship burdens in cancer survivors.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted including studies if they focused on cohorts of cancer survivors, utilized peripheral blood cell DNAm data, and evaluated the associations of DNAm and survivorship issues.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies were identified, with majority focused on breast (n = 7) or childhood cancer (n = 9) survivors, and half studies included less than 100 patients (n = 11). Survivorship issues evaluated included those related to neurocognition (n = 5), psychiatric health (n = 3), general wellness (n = 9), chronic conditions (n = 5), and treatment specific toxicities (n = 4). Studies evaluated epigenetic age metrics (n = 10) and DNAm levels at individual CpG sites or regions (n = 12) for their associations with survivorship issues in cancer survivors along with relevant confounding factors. Significant associations of measured DNAm in the peripheral blood samples of cancer survivors and survivorship issues were identified.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Studies utilizing epigenetic age metrics and differential methylation analysis demonstrated significant associations of DNAm measurements with survivorship burdens. Associations were observed encompassing diverse survivorship outcomes and timeframes relative to anti-cancer therapy initiation. These findings underscore the potential of these measurements as useful biomarkers in survivorship care and research.

The Clinical Utility of a 7-Gene Biosignature on Radiation Therapy Decision Making in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Following Breast-Conserving Surgery: An Updated Analysis of the DCISionRT® PREDICT Study

BACKGROUND

Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) is a standard treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). A low-risk patient subset that does not benefit from RT has not yet been clearly identified. The DCISionRT test provides a clinically validated decision score (DS), which is prognostic of 10-year in-breast recurrence rates (invasive and non-invasive) and is also predictive of RT benefit. This analysis presents final outcomes from the PREDICT prospective registry trial aiming to determine how often the DCISionRT test changes radiation treatment recommendations.

METHODS

Overall, 2496 patients were enrolled from February 2018 to January 2022 at 63 academic and community practice sites and received DCISionRT as part of their care plan. Treating physicians reported their treatment recommendations pre- and post-test as well as the patient's preference. The primary endpoint was to identify the percentage of patients where testing led to a change in RT recommendation. The impact of the test on RT treatment recommendation was physician specialty, treatment settings, individual clinical/pathological features and RTOG 9804 like criteria. Multivariate logisitc regression analysis was used to estimate the odds ratio (ORs) for factors associated with the post-test RT recommendations.

RESULTS

RT recommendation changed 38% of women, resulting in a 20% decrease in the overall recommendation of RT (p < 0.001). Of those women initially recommended no RT (n = 583), 31% were recommended RT post-test. The recommendation for RT post-test increased with increasing DS, from 29% to 66% to 91% for DS <2, DS 2-4, and DS >4, respectively. On multivariable analysis, DS had the strongest influence on final RT recommendation (odds ratio 22.2, 95% confidence interval 16.3-30.7), which was eightfold greater than clinicopathologic features. Furthermore, there was an overall change in the recommendation to receive RT in 42% of those patients meeting RTOG 9804-like low-risk criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

The test results provided information that changes treatment recommendations both for and against RT use in large population of women with DCIS treated in a variety of clinical settings. Overall, clinicians changed their recommendations to include or omit RT for 38% of women based on the test results. Based on published clinical validations and the results from current study, DCISionRT may aid in preventing the over- and undertreatment of clinicopathological 'low-risk' and 'high-risk' DCIS patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03448926 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03448926 ).

A data-driven approach to improve wellness and reduce recurrence in cancer survivors

For many cancer survivors, toxic side effects of treatment, lingering effects of the aftermath of disease and cancer recurrence adversely affect quality of life (QoL) and reduce healthspan. Data-driven approaches for quantifying and improving wellness in healthy individuals hold great promise for improving the lives of cancer survivors. The data-driven strategy will also guide personalized nutrition and exercise recommendations that may help prevent cancer recurrence and secondary malignancies in survivors.