Evaluation of Intravenous Posaconazole Dosing and Pharmacokinetic Target Attainment in Pediatric Patients

Posaconazole in paediatric malignancy and haematopoietic stem cell transplant: dosing to achieve therapeutic concentration

OBJECTIVES

Posaconazole is increasingly used for the treatment and prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised children. We aimed to review evidence for paediatric posaconazole dosing regimens focusing on attainment of target concentrations and frequency of adverse effects.

METHODS

In May 2023, the Cochrane, Embase, MEDLINE and PubMed databases were searched for articles reporting posaconazole dosing in children with malignancy or post-haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Studies reporting the attainment of target serum concentrations were included.

RESULTS

Overall, 24 studies were included. Eighteen studies of the oral suspension consistently reported poor attainment of target concentrations for prophylaxis (≥0.7 µg/mL, 12%-78%) despite high daily doses of 14-23 mg/kg/day (max. 1200 mg/day). Target attainment was significantly affected by gastric pH and food intake. Six studies of the delayed-release tablet (DRT) reported 58%-94% achieved concentrations ≥0.7 µg/mL, with the majority using lower doses of 4-12 mg/kg/day (max. 300 mg/day). Similarly, one study of powder for oral suspension found 67%-100% achieved target concentrations with a dose of 6 mg/kg/day (max. 300 mg/day). As expected, the IV formulation had high attainment of prophylaxis targets (81%-90%) with 6-10 mg/kg/day (max. 400 mg/day). All formulations were well tolerated, and no relationship between adverse effects and posaconazole concentrations was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The required posaconazole dose in immunocompromised children varies depending on the formulation. The IV infusion had the highest attainment of therapeutic concentration followed by the DRT and powder for suspension. By contrast, the oral suspension had low attainment of target concentrations despite higher daily doses.

Invasive Mold Infections in Children: Navigating Troubled Waters with a Broken Compass

Incidence of invasive mold infections in children, while rare, is increasing as the population of high-risk patients expands, including premature infants, pediatric patients undergoing treatment for hematological malignancies, or recipients of allogeneic hematologic stem cell transplants. The infectious agents, including Aspergillus spp., Mucorales, and other molds, are especially difficult to treat and have serious morbidity and high mortality. Clinicians must maintain a high index of suspicion for invasive mold infections in at-risk patients. Diagnosis of invasive mold infections is complicated by difficulties isolating pathogens on culture, but progress is being made in immunological and molecular diagnostic technologies. Treatment in children is challenging; no randomized controlled trials exist. There is a growing body of data on treatment, specifically on safer antifungal agents, including indications for treatment, spectrum of coverage, pharmacokinetics for different ages, and pharmacodynamic targets associated with therapeutic success. However, pediatricians must often extrapolate from adult data. In this review, we aim to harmonize the existing body of literature on invasive mold infections in children, covering epidemiology, clinical presentations, diagnostic methods, and principles of management.

Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of invasive fungal disease due to moulds other than Aspergillus in the haematology/oncology setting, 2021

Invasive fungal disease (IFD) due to moulds other than Aspergillus is a significant cause of mortality in patients with malignancies or post haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. The current guidelines focus on the diagnosis and management of the common non-Aspergillus moulds (NAM), such as Mucorales, Scedosporium species (spp.), Lomentospora prolificans and Fusarium spp. Rare but emerging NAM including Paecilomyces variotii, Purpureocillium lilacinum and Scopulariopsis spp. are also reviewed. Culture and histological examination of tissue biopsy specimens remain the mainstay of diagnosis, but molecular methods are increasingly being used. As NAM frequently disseminate, blood cultures and skin examination with biopsy of any suspicious lesions are critically important. Treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach with surgical debridement as a central component. Other management strategies include control of the underlying disease/predisposing factors, augmentation of the host response and the reduction of immunosuppression. Carefully selected antifungal therapy, guided by susceptibility testing, is critical to cure. We also outline novel antifungal agents still in clinical trial which offer substantial potential for improved outcomes in the future. Paediatric recommendations follow those of adults. Ongoing epidemiological research, improvement in diagnostics and the development of new antifungal agents will continue to improve the poor outcomes that have been traditionally associated with IFD due to NAM.

Consensus guidelines for antifungal prophylaxis in haematological malignancy and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation, 2021

Antifungal prophylaxis can reduce morbidity and mortality from invasive fungal disease (IFD). However, its use needs to be optimised and appropriately targeted to patients at highest risk to derive the most benefit. In addition to established risks for IFD, considerable recent progress in the treatment of malignancies has resulted in the development of new 'at-risk' groups. The changing epidemiology of IFD and emergence of drug resistance continue to impact choice of prophylaxis, highlighting the importance of active surveillance and knowledge of local epidemiology. These guidelines aim to highlight emerging risk groups and review the evidence and limitations around new formulations of established agents and new antifungal drugs. It provides recommendations around use and choice of antifungal prophylaxis, discusses the potential impact of the changing epidemiology of IFD and emergence of drug resistance, and future directions for risk stratification to assist optimal management of highly vulnerable patients.

Evaluation of Posaconazole Dosing in Children and Young Adults: A Single-Center Review

OBJECTIVE

Initial posaconazole dosing regimens in children often do not achieve target concentrations, and data continue to support the need for higher initial dosing regimens. The objective of this study is to contribute to the current data regarding suboptimal posaconazole dosing in pediatric patients by retrospectively observing dosing strategies and subsequent drug concentrations.

METHODS

This study was conducted at a single institution in 27 patients aged 1 to 21 years. Patients who were initiated on any formulation of posaconazole for prophylaxis or treatment while admitted to the hospital were included. The primary outcome was to determine the percentage of pediatric patients who achieved the targeted trough concentration using their initial posaconazole dosing regimen. Secondary outcomes included percentage of patients who experienced a breakthrough invasive fungal infection (IFI), percentage of patients with elevated liver function tests (LFTs), and discontinuation for any reason.

RESULTS

There were 15 patients (55.5%) who reached desired trough serum concentration after the initial dosing regimen. The number of dose modifications to achieve the desired trough ranged from 1 to 3. Most patients received delayed-release tablets (n = 17), and the average doses for reaching prophylactic and treatment trough concentrations were 6.1 mg/kg/day and 11 mg/kg/day, respectively. There were 2 patients (7.4%) who experienced breakthrough IFI. Overall, 5 patients developed elevated LFTs and 7 patients discontinued treatment early.

CONCLUSIONS

The results describe a single population of pediatric patients, of whom 55% were able to achieve target trough concentrations of posaconazole with the initial dosing strategy used.

Evaluating posaconazole, its pharmacology, efficacy and safety for the prophylaxis and treatment of fungal infections

INTRODUCTION

Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among immunocompromised patients. Safe and effective antifungal medications used for prophylaxis and treatment are pivotal in their management. Posaconazole is a promising triazole antifungal agent.

AREAS COVERED

The authors discuss the pharmacological properties of posaconazole, including pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability profile, together with efficacy data for prophylaxis and treatment as well as its use in special populations based on current literature.

EXPERT OPINION

Posaconazole has a favorable safety and tolerability profile; however, caution is advised when co-administered with agents that are CYP3A4 inhibitors, because their concentration may significantly increase, and their levels should be closely monitored. It has an extended spectrum of activity against yeasts and filamentous fungi. It is successfully used as prophylaxis for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML)/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and post-hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). It is the first line treatment for oropharyngeal candidiasis and is also used as a salvage treatment for refractory IFDs. Currently available formulations include the oral suspension, delayed-release tablets and solution for intravenous infusion, all with different PK/PD properties and indications. Its use in children and adolescents is currently being examined in Phase-II clinical trials.

Antifungal agents and the kidney: pharmacokinetics, clinical nephrotoxicity, and interactions

INTRODUCTION

Invasive fungal infections continue to be important causes of morbidity and mortality in severely ill and immunocompromised patient populations. The past three decades have seen a considerable expansion in antifungal drug research, resulting in the clinical development of different classes of antifungal agents with different pharmacologic properties. Among drug-specific characteristics of antifungal agents, renal disposition and nephrotoxicity are important clinical considerations as many patients requiring antifungal therapy have compromised organ functions or are receiving other potentially nephrotoxic medications.

AREAS COVERED

The present article reviews incidence, severity and mechanisms of nephrotoxicity associated with antifungal agents used for prevention and treatment of invasive fungal diseases by discussing distribution, metabolism, elimination and drug-related adverse events in the context of safety data from phase II and III clinical studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Based on the available data amphotericin B deoxycholate has the highest relative potential for nephrotoxicity, followed by the lipid formulations of amphotericin B, and, to a much lesser extent and by indirect mechanisms, the antifungal triazoles.

Experience using intravenous posaconazole in paediatric and young adult oncology patients

BACKGROUND

Posaconazole exhibits broad-spectrum antifungal activity. An IV formulation became available in 2014. Few studies describing the use of this formulation exist in patients under the age of 18 years. This study describes our experience using IV posaconazole in paediatric and young adult cancer patients.

METHODS

This single-centre retrospective chart review evaluated patients who received IV posaconazole and had at least one posaconazole plasma concentration obtained after five or more days with a consistent dosage. Relationships between doses required to achieve a plasma concentration of ≥1 µg/mL and patient age, weight and body surface area (BSA) were evaluated. The clinical record was reviewed to identify descriptions of any adverse events.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were analysed, with a median age of 10.5 years (range 1.9-22.9 years; 92% were <18 years). All patients were able to achieve a posaconazole plasma concentration ≥1 µg/mL during their treatment course. The daily mg/kg/day dose required to achieve the target concentration decreased significantly with increasing age of the patient (P = 0.018). Assessment of dosage based on BSA suggested a requirement of 225 mg/m2/day across all age groups <18 years. Adverse events documented in the clinical record were consistent with those described with the oral formulations. No CNS toxicities were observed with use of IV posaconazole.

CONCLUSIONS

Concentrations ≥1 µg/mL are achievable and a BSA-based dosing approach may allow a consistent empirical dose for patients <18 years of age. Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended to ensure patients achieve therapeutic concentrations.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Posaconazole

Posaconazole is typically used for preventing invasive yeast and mold infections such as invasive aspergillosis in high-risk immunocompromised patients. The oral suspension was the first released formulation and many pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of this formulation have been published. Erratic absorption profiles associated with this formulation were widely reported. Posaconazole exposure was found to be significantly influenced by food and many gastrointestinal conditions, including pH and motility. As a result, low posaconazole plasma concentrations were obtained in large groups of patients. These issues of erratic absorption urged the development of the subsequently marketed delayed-release tablet, which proved to be associated with higher and more stable exposure profiles. Shortly thereafter, an intravenous formulation was released for patients who are not able to take oral formulations. Both new formulations require a loading dose on day 1 to achieve high posaconazole concentrations more quickly, which was not possible with the oral suspension. So far, there appears to be no evidence of increased toxicity correlated to the higher posaconazole exposure achieved with the regimen for these formulations. The higher systemic availability of posaconazole for the delayed-release tablet and intravenous formulation have resulted in these two formulations being preferable for both prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal disease. This review aimed to integrate the current knowledge on posaconazole pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, major toxicity, existing resistance, clinical experience in special populations, and new therapeutic strategies in order to get a clear understanding of the clinical use of this drug.

Initial posaconazole dosing to achieve therapeutic serum posaconazole concentrations among children, adolescents, and young adults receiving delayed-release tablet and intravenous posaconazole

Posaconazole is a broad-spectrum antifungal used for prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal diseases. There are limited data on the optimal dosing, safety, and efficacy of the DRT and IV formulations in immunocompromised pediatric and adolescent patients. We describe our experience including dosing, plasma trough concentrations, safety, and tolerability. Plasma concentrations ≥.7 µg/mL were considered therapeutic for prophylaxis and ≥1.0 µg/mL for treatment. Fifty-four patients (median age of 16 years) received DRT or IV formulations of posaconazole. Thirty-one (57%) patients received posaconazole for treatment and 23 (43%) for prophylaxis. Overall, 36 (67%) patients achieved targeted initial plasma trough concentrations (median 1.3 µg/mL) (Figure 1). The median daily dose among patients <13 years of age who achieved the targeted initial concentrations was 7.3 mg/kg/day for the DRT formulation and 9.8 mg/kg/day for the IV formulation. The median daily dose among patients ≥13 years of age who achieved the targeted initial concentrations was 4.9 mg/kg/day for the DRT formulation and 5.6 mg/kg/day for the IV formulation. Thirty-six patients (67%) developed transaminitis, mostly grade 1. Our observations show that DRT and IV formulations are safe and effective in immunocompromised children, adolescents, and young adults. Higher dosing per body weight of DRT and IV posaconazole may be required in patients <13 years of age compared with patients 13 years of age and older to achieve therapeutic plasma concentrations. [Figure: see text].

Antifungal Triazole Posaconazole Targets an Early Stage of the Parechovirus A3 Life Cycle

Viruses in species Parechovirus A (Picornaviridae) are associated with a wide variety of clinical manifestations. Parechovirus A3 (PeV-A3) is known to cause sepsis-like illness, meningitis, and encephalitis in infants and young children. To date, no specific therapies are available to treat PeV-A3-infected children. We had previously identified two FDA-cleared antifungal drugs, itraconazole (ITC) and posaconazole (POS), with potent and specific antiviral activity against PeV-A3. Time-of-addition and synchronized infection assays revealed that POS targets an early stage of the PeV-A3 life cycle. POS exerts an antiviral effect, evidenced by a reduction in viral titer following the addition of POS to Vero-P cells before infection, coaddition of POS and PeV-A3 to Vero-P cells, incubation of POS and PeV-A3 prior to Vero-P infection, and at attachment. POS exerts less of an effect on virus entry. A PeV-A3 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay inhibition experiment, using an anti-PeV-A3 monoclonal antibody, suggested that POS binds directly to the PeV-A3 capsid. POS-resistant PeV-A3 strains developed by serial passage in the presence of POS acquired substitutions in multiple regions of the genome, including the capsid. Reverse genetics confirmed substitutions in capsid proteins VP0, VP3, and VP1 and nonstructural proteins 2A and 3A. Single mutants VP0_K66R, VP0_A124T, VP3_N88S, VP1_Y224C, 2A_S78L, and 3A_T1I were 4-, 9-, 12-, 34-, 51-, and 119-fold more resistant to POS, respectively, than the susceptible prototype strain. Our studies demonstrate that POS may be a valuable tool in developing an antiviral therapy for PeV-A3.