Implantable cardiac pacemaker failure by cumulative dose effects of flattening filter free beams

Safety Review of Radiotherapy for Tumor Patients with Implantable Cardiac Pacemaker

Permanent pacemaker implantation is one of the most effective treatments for chronic arrhythmia. However, there is a certain risk associated with radiation therapy in cancer patients with implantable cardiac pacemakers. To prevent radiotherapy-induced pacemaker failure, there are established medical guidelines for the use of pacemakers in patients undergoing radiotherapy. With advancements in science and technology, the variety of available pacemakers has considerably increased, and radiotherapy equipment has also been updated. Given the variations in irradiation methods and the types of radiation used in clinical practice, there is a pressing need for international consensus on the regulations governing the use of cardiac pacemakers in cancer patients. Currently, many countries lack clinical guidelines for radiotherapy in cancer patients with cardiac pacemakers. This review summarizes recent reports and studies from PubMed (National Center for Biotechnology Information) regarding the safety of radiotherapy in cancer patients with implanted cardiac pacemakers, and provides valuable insights for clinical practice.

Risk of cardiac implantable device malfunction in cancer patients receiving proton therapy: an overview

Age is a risk factor for both cardiovascular disease and cancer, and as such radiation oncologists frequently see a number of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) receiving proton therapy (PT). CIED malfunctions induced by PT are nonnegligible and can occur in both passive scattering and pencil beam scanning modes. In the absence of an evidence-based protocol, the authors emphasise that this patient cohort should be managed differently to electron- and photon- external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) patients due to distinct properties of proton beams. Given the lack of a PT-specific guideline for managing this cohort and limited studies on this important topic; the process was initiated by evaluating all PT-related CIED malfunctions to provide a baseline for future reporting and research. In this review, different modes of PT and their interactions with a variety of CIEDs and pacing leads are discussed. Effects of PT on CIEDs were classified into a variety of hardware and software malfunctions. Apart from secondary neutrons, cumulative radiation dose, dose rate, CIED model/manufacturer, distance from CIED to proton field, and materials used in CIEDs/pacing leads were all evaluated to determine the probability of malfunctions. The importance of proton beam arrangements is highlighted in this study. Manufacturers should specify recommended dose limits for patients undergoing PT. The establishment of an international multidisciplinary team dedicated to CIED-bearing patients receiving PT may be beneficial.

Methods for confirming the safety of radiation therapy in patients with left ventricular assist device: a case of extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type

A left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a treatment option for patients with end-stage heart failure; however, a certain number of patients on durable LVADs are diagnosed with malignancy. Radiation therapy (RT) for patients with durable LVADs has safety concerns, because RT may interfere with the device. Herein, we report a case of RT during durable LVAD management. A 48-year-old man with a durable LVAD was diagnosed with sinusitis. As his symptoms were resistant to drug therapy, endoscopic sinus surgery was performed, and extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENKL) was pathologically detected. Since RT was the first-line treatment for ENKL, we conducted two types of irradiation experiments to determine whether RT can be safely performed in patients with durable LVADs as follows: (1) assessing the extent of the radiation levels at each site and evaluating device malfunction by irradiating the lesion sites in the patient model with the same protocol as planned, and (2) evaluating device malfunction by directly irradiating the durable LVAD equipment once at the scheduled total dose. The radiation doses at the pump, driveline, system controller, power cable, and power module of the durable LVAD reached 7.86 cGy, 6.34 cGy, 0.66 cGy, 0.38 cGy, and 0.14 cGy, respectively. In both experiments, durable LVAD malfunction or any type of alarm was not observed. We concluded that RT could be safely performed with chemotherapy in this patient and our irradiation experiments can be applied to RT for other malignancies.

Study of feasible and safe condition for total body irradiation using cardiac implantable electronic devices

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) were believed to have a tolerance dose and that direct irradiation has to be avoided. Thus, no clinical guidelines have mentioned the feasibility of total body irradiation (TBI) with a CIED directly. The purpose of this work was to study a feasible and safe condition for TBI using a CIED. Eighteen CIEDs were directly irradiated by a 6-MV X-ray beam, where a non-neutron producible beam was employed for the removal of any neutron contribution to CIED malfunction. Irradiation up to 10 Gy in accumulated dose was conducted with a 100-cGy/min dose rate, followed by up to 20 Gy at 200 cGy/min. An irradiation test of whether inappropriate ventricular shock therapy was triggered or not was also performed by using a 6-MV beam of 5, 10, 20 and 40 cGy/min to two CIEDs. No malfunction was observed during irradiation up to 20 Gy at 100 and 200 cGy/min without activation of shock therapy. These results were compared with typical TBI, suggesting that a CIED in TBI will not encounter malfunction because the prescribed dose and the dose rate required for TBI are much safer than those used in this experiment. Several inappropriate shock therapies were, however, observed even at 10 cGy/min if activated. The present result suggested that TBI was feasible and safe if a non-neutron producible beam was employed at low dose-rate without activation of shock therapy, where it was not inconsistent with clinical and non-clinical data in the literature. The feasibility of TBI while using a CIED was discussed for the first time.