Nerve Reconstruction Using Processed Nerve Allograft in the U.S. Military

Challenges in the surgical treatment of neuroma in continuity in the upper extremity using human acellular nerve allografts

The restoration of nerve function after the injury might be complicated by the development of a disorganized fibrous mass-a neuroma. This results in sensory and/or motor deficits and pain that can be severely debilitating. Surgical excision of the painful neuroma may leave a gap, which can be bridged using autografts or allografts. The main objectives of this study were to obtain 1-year clinical results in patients who underwent excision and reconstruction of a painful neuroma in continuity using decellularized allografts after nerve lesions in the upper extremity. In a prospective cohort study, we evaluated 21 consecutive patients. The patients were evaluated for pain, motor, and sensory function of the hand as well as with patient-reported outcomes. The results showed meaningful sensory recovery in 47% (≥S3), persisting cold intolerance in 48%, disabling hypersensitivity in 48%, and new neuroma formation proximal to or within the allograft in 25% of patients, one year post-operatively. Q-DASH showed 52% of patients with poor results. Overall, 43% of the patients had persisting pain in rest and activity. Measuring muscle strength showed grip strength of 60% and a pinch of 58% of the strength measured in the uninjured hand, which was statistically significant. Even with the excision of a neuroma in continuity and reconstruction with human acellular nerve allograft, limited functional outcome, pain, cold intolerance, and hyperesthesia may persist in the treated patients. There is also the risk of new neuroma formation proximal to or within the allograft.

Direct Suturing of Ulnar or Median Nerve Defects in High-Degree Elbow Flexion: An Experimental Cadaver Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to determine the maximum loss of median and ulnar nerve substances that can be treated by direct suture in elbow flexion and to quantify this elbow flexion. The other objective is to determine the participation of the wrist position in this direct suture in elbow flexion.

METHODS

We performed an experimental study on 6 ulnar nerve lesions and 6 median nerve lesions. For each defect, a direct tensionless suture was performed with elbow flexion and in three different positions of the wrist (wrist extension, neutral position, and wrist flexion).

RESULTS

A 90° elbow flexion allowed direct suturing of defects up to 40 mm in the 3 positions of the wrist. A bowstringing effect (i.e., increase of the perpendicular distance of the nerve from the axis of rotation of the elbow) was noted starting from 25 mm of nerve defect. Wrist extension placed tension on the nerve suture for both nerves.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this first anatomical study clarified the conditions for direct suturing of ulnar and median nerve defects in the flexed elbow position and flexed wrist position. This is an approach to consider for limited nerve defects to the elbow or when allograft harvesting is to be avoided.

Management of "Long" Nerve Gaps

Long-gap nerve injuries offer unique physiological and logistical treatment challenges to the reconstructive surgeon. Options include nerve autograft, processed nerve allograft, nerve transfers, and tendon transfers. This review provides an evidence-framed discussion regarding the pros and cons of these diverse approaches.

Nerve Allografts: Current Utility and Future Directions

Processed nerve allograft is a widely accepted tool for reconstructing peripheral nerve defects. Repair parameters that need to be considered include gap length, nerve diameter, nerve type (motor, sensory, or mixed), and the soft tissue envelope. Although the use of processed nerve allograft must be considered based on each unique clinical scenario, a rough algorithm can be formed based on the available animal and clinical literature. This article critically reviews the current surgical algorithm, defines the role of processed nerve allograft compared with nerve autograft, and discusses how this role may change in the future.

The effectiveness of acellular nerve allografts compared to autografts in animal models: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Treatment of nerve injuries proves to be a worldwide clinical challenge. Acellular nerve allografts are suggested to be a promising alternative for bridging a nerve gap to the current gold standard, an autologous nerve graft.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the efficacy of the acellular nerve allograft, its difference from the gold standard (the nerve autograft) and to discuss its possible indications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were systematically searched until the 4th of January 2022. Original peer reviewed paper that presented 1) distinctive data; 2) a clear comparison between not immunologically processed acellular allografts and autologous nerve transfers; 3) was performed in laboratory animals of all species and sex. Meta analyses and subgroup analyses (for graft length and species) were conducted for muscle weight, sciatic function index, ankle angle, nerve conduction velocity, axon count diameter, tetanic contraction and amplitude using a Random effects model. Subgroup analyses were conducted on graft length and species.

RESULTS

Fifty articles were included in this review and all were included in the meta-analyses. An acellular allograft resulted in a significantly lower muscle weight, sciatic function index, ankle angle, nerve conduction velocity, axon count and smaller diameter, tetanic contraction compared to an autologous nerve graft. No difference was found in amplitude between acellular allografts and autologous nerve transfers. Post hoc subgroup analyses of graft length showed a significant reduced muscle weight in long grafts versus small and medium length grafts. All included studies showed a large variance in methodological design.

CONCLUSION

Our review shows that the included studies, investigating the use of acellular allografts, showed a large variance in methodological design and are as a consequence difficult to compare. Nevertheless, our results indicate that treating a nerve gap with an allograft results in an inferior nerve recovery compared to an autograft in seven out of eight outcomes assessed in experimental animals. In addition, based on our preliminary post hoc subgroup analyses we suggest that when an allograft is being used an allograft in short and medium (0-1cm, > 1-2cm) nerve gaps is preferred over an allograft in long (> 2cm) nerve gaps.

Challenges in Nerve Repair and Reconstruction

Peripheral nerve injuries may substantially impair a patient's function and quality of life. Despite appropriate treatment, outcomes often remain poor. Direct repair remains the standard of care when repair is possible without excessive tension. For larger nerve defects, nerve autografting is the gold standard. However, a considerable challenge is donor site morbidity. Processed nerve allografts and conduits are other options, but evidence supporting their use is limited to smaller nerves and shorter gaps. Nerve transfer is another technique that has seen increasing popularity. The future of care may include novel biologics and pharmacologic therapy to enhance regeneration.

Traumatic peripheral nerve injuries: diagnosis and management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review advances in the diagnostic evaluation and management of traumatic peripheral nerve injuries.

RECENT FINDINGS

Serial multimodal assessment of peripheral nerve injuries facilitates assessment of spontaneous axonal regeneration and selection of appropriate patients for early surgical intervention. Novel surgical and rehabilitative approaches have been developed to complement established strategies, particularly in the area of nerve grafting, targeted rehabilitation strategies and interventions to promote nerve regeneration. However, several management challenges remain, including incomplete reinnervation, traumatic neuroma development, maladaptive central remodeling and management of fatigue, which compromise functional recovery.

SUMMARY

Innovative approaches to the assessment and treatment of peripheral nerve injuries hold promise in improving the degree of functional recovery; however, this remains a complex and evolving area.

Defects of the sciatic nerve and its divisions treated by direct suturing in 90 degrees knee flexion: report on the first clinical series

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate functional results after treatment of large defects of the sciatic nerve and its divisions by direct nerve suturing in high knee flexion.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted in patients treated for lower extremity nerve defects between 2011 and 2019. Inclusion criteria were a defect > 2 cm with a minimal follow-up period of 2 years for the sciatic nerve and 1 year for its divisions. Nerve defects were bridged by an end-to-end suture with the knee flexed at 90° for 6 weeks. Functional results were assessed based on the Medical Research Council's grading system.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients with a mean age of 27.6 years were included. They presented with seven sciatic nerve defects and ten division defects, including eight missile injuries. The mean time to surgery was 12.3 weeks and the mean nerve defect length was 5 cm. Overall, 21 nerve sutures were performed, with eight in the tibial distribution and 13 in the fibular distribution. Post-operatively, there was no significant knee stiffness related to the immobilization. The mean follow-up time was 24.5 months. Meaningful motor and sensory recovery were observed after 7 of 8 sutures in the tibial distribution and 11 of 13 sutures in the fibular distribution. A functional sural triceps muscle with protective sensibility of the sole was restored in all patients. There were no differences according to the injury mechanisms.

CONCLUSION

Temporary knee flexion at 90° allows for direct coaptation of sciatic nerve defects up to 8 cm, with promising results no matter the level or mechanism of injury.

Ballistic peripheral nerve injuries: basic concepts, controversies, and proposal for a management strategy

Ballistic injuries to peripheral nerves are devastating injuries frequently encountered in modern conflicts and civilian trauma centers. Such injuries often produce lifelong morbidity, mainly in the form of function loss and chronic pain. However, their surgical management still poses significant challenges concerning indication, timing, and type of repair, particularly when they are part of high-energy multi-tissue injuries. To help trauma surgeons, this article first presents basic ballistic concepts explaining different types of missile nerve lesions, described using the Sunderland classification, as well as their usual associated injuries. Current controversies regarding their surgical management are then described, including nerve exploration timing and neurolysis's relevance as a treatment option. Finally, based on anecdotal evidence and a literature review, a standardized management strategy for ballistic nerve injuries is proposed. This article emphasizes the importance of early nerve exploration and provides a detailed method for making a diagnosis in both acute and sub-acute periods. Direct suturing with joint flexion is strongly recommended for sciatic nerve defects and any nerve defect of limited size. Conversely, large defects require conventional nerve grafting, and proximal injuries may require nerve transfers, especially at the brachial plexus level. Additionally, combined or early secondary tendon transfers are helpful in certain injuries. Finally, ideal timing for nerve repair is proposed, based on the defect length, associated injuries, and risk of infection, which correlate intimately to the projectile velocity.

A Retrospective Case Series of Peripheral Mixed Nerve Reconstruction Failures Using Processed Nerve Allografts

BACKGROUND

Favorable rates of meaningful recovery (≥M3/S3) of processed nerve allografts (PNAs) for mixed and motor nerve injuries have been reported, but there are few reports of patients having complete PNA failure (M0/S0). The purpose of this study was to describe the outcomes, including rate of complete failures, in a case series of patients who underwent PNA for peripheral mixed nerve reconstructions.

METHODS

A retrospective review of outcomes between May 2018 to September 2020 was performed. Consecutive patients who underwent nerve reconstruction (>15 mm) with PNA for a peripheral mixed nerve injury of the upper or lower extremity were eligible. Those who returned to clinic for a 10-month postoperative visit were included in this study. The primary outcome was whether the patient was defined as having a complete failure (M0/S0).

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients underwent a PNA during the time period; 14 patients participated in follow-up and were included (average age: 34.7 years) with a mean follow-up of 11.9 months. The average gap length was 46.4 mm (range 15-110 mm). At their 10-month postoperative visit, no patients had any motor or sensory improvement; all patients were deemed as having complete failure. Four patients underwent or were planned for subsequent revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we demonstrated a high number of complete failures, with all 14 included patients sustaining a complete failure (100% failure rate) at a minimum 10-month follow-up visit. Failure in this case series was not observed to affect one nerve type, location, or be related to preoperative injury size.