1
|
Hellwig LD, Turner C, Olsen C, Libbus J, Markos B, Koehlmoos T, Haigney M, De Castro M, Saunders D. Assessing Clinical Utility of Pharmacogenetic Testing in the Military Health System. Mil Med 2024; 189:e198-e204. [PMID: 37436924 PMCID: PMC11022329 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usad254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Response to medications can differ widely among individual patients. Adverse drug reactions can lead to serious morbidity and mortality. Pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing can predict responses to medications and increased risks of adverse events where the genetic basis is understood. Several published manuscripts suggest positive impacts of systematic preemptive PGx testing. However, few studies have been conducted on PGx implementation in the Military Health System (MHS). MATERIAL AND METHODS A cross-sectional study of adult beneficiaries in a primary care clinic at a large military treatment facility was conducted in 2022. Participants underwent PGx genotyping of CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 genes at the Defense Health Agency Genetics Reference Laboratory. Participant medication lists were compared to the current Clinical Pharmacogenetic Implementation Consortium (CPIC) PGx gene-drug guidelines to assess potential actionability of these results. RESULTS Genotyping of CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 in 165 MHS beneficiaries (mean age: 65 years) revealed that 81.2% of participants had at least one abnormal PGx finding. Among those with an abnormal PGx result, 65% were taking a medication listed on the CPIC website with an association with the particular gene in which the finding was identified. In addition, 78% of all of the participants in the study were taking at least one medication that is metabolized by CYP2C19 or CYP2D6 with associated CPIC guidelines. CONCLUSIONS Pharmacogenetic testing for CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 identified a substantial proportion of MHS patients at a single center who could benefit from evaluation of current medication regimens based on the CPIC guidelines. Individualized medical management may be warranted to a greater degree than previously recognized based on the findings given possible differences in medication metabolism. Many MHS beneficiaries already take medications metabolized by CYP2C19 and CYP2D6, and a substantial proportion may be at risk for preventable adverse events for medications metabolized by these enzymes. While preliminary, a large number of actionable polymorphisms among a relatively small set of individuals taking at-risk medications suggest that implementing PGx testing in clinical practice may be beneficial in the MHS with appropriate clinical infrastructure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia D Hellwig
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD 20817, USA
- Center for Military Precision Health (CMPH), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Clesson Turner
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
| | - Cara Olsen
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Joya Libbus
- Military Cardiovascular Outcomes Research, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
- Metis Foundation, San Antonio, TX 78216, USA
| | - Bethelhem Markos
- Military Cardiovascular Outcomes Research, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
- Metis Foundation, San Antonio, TX 78216, USA
| | - Tracey Koehlmoos
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Mark Haigney
- Military Cardiovascular Outcomes Research, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
- Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda,, MD 20814, USA
| | - Mauricio De Castro
- Keesler Air Force Base, 81st Medical Operations Squadron, Biloxi, MS 39534, USA
| | - David Saunders
- Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda,, MD 20814, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stratton TP, Olson AW. Personalizing Personalized Medicine: The Confluence of Pharmacogenomics, a Person's Medication Experience and Ethics. PHARMACY 2023; 11:101. [PMID: 37368427 PMCID: PMC10304183 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy11030101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Truly personalized precision medicine combines pharmacogenomics (PGx), a person's lived medication experiences and ethics; person-centeredness lies at the confluence of these considerations. A person-centered perspective can help inform PGx-related treatment guidelines, shared decision-making for PGx-related therapeutics and PGx-related healthcare policy. This article examines the interplay between these components of person-centered PGx-related care. Ethics concepts addressed include privacy, confidentiality, autonomy, informed consent, fiduciary responsibility, respect, the burden of pharmacogenomics knowledge for both the patient and healthcare provider and the pharmacist's ethical role in PGx-testing. Incorporating the patient's lived medication experience and ethics principles into PGx-based discussions of treatment can optimize the ethical, person-centered application of PGx testing to patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy P. Stratton
- University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Duluth, MN 55812, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Primiero CA, Baker AM, Wallingford CK, Maas EJ, Yanes T, Fowles L, Janda M, Young MA, Nisselle A, Terrill B, Lodge JM, Tiller JM, Lacaze P, Andersen H, McErlean G, Turbitt E, Soyer HP, McInerney-Leo AM. Attitudes of Australian dermatologists on the use of genetic testing: A cross-sectional survey with a focus on melanoma. Front Genet 2022; 13:919134. [PMID: 36353112 PMCID: PMC9638172 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.919134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Melanoma genetic testing reportedly increases preventative behaviour without causing psychological harm. Genetic testing for familial melanoma risk is now available, yet little is known about dermatologists' perceptions regarding the utility of testing and genetic testing ordering behaviours. Objectives: To survey Australasian Dermatologists on the perceived utility of genetic testing, current use in practice, as well as their confidence and preferences for the delivery of genomics education. Methods: A 37-item survey, based on previously validated instruments, was sent to accredited members of the Australasian College of Dermatologists in March 2021. Quantitative items were analysed statistically, with one open-ended question analysed qualitatively. Results: The response rate was 56% (256/461), with 60% (153/253) of respondents between 11 and 30 years post-graduation. While 44% (112/252) of respondents agreed, or strongly agreed, that genetic testing was relevant to their practice today, relevance to future practice was reported significantly higher at 84% (212/251) (t = -9.82, p < 0.001). Ninety three percent (235/254) of respondents reported rarely or never ordering genetic testing. Dermatologists who viewed genetic testing as relevant to current practice were more likely to have discussed (p < 0.001) and/or offered testing (p < 0.001). Respondents indicated high confidence in discussing family history of melanoma, but lower confidence in ordering genetic tests and interpreting results. Eighty four percent (207/247) believed that genetic testing could negatively impact life insurance, while only 26% (63/244) were aware of the moratorium on using genetic test results in underwriting in Australia. A minority (22%, 55/254) reported prior continuing education in genetics. Face-to-face courses were the preferred learning modality for upskilling. Conclusion: Australian Dermatologists widely recognise the relevance of genetic testing to future practice, yet few currently order genetic tests. Future educational interventions could focus on how to order appropriate genetic tests and interpret results, as well as potential implications on insurance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare A. Primiero
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Amy M. Baker
- Discipline of Genetic Counselling, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Courtney K. Wallingford
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Ellie J. Maas
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Tatiane Yanes
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Lindsay Fowles
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Monika Janda
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Mary-Anne Young
- Kinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Amy Nisselle
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Bronwyn Terrill
- Kinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jason M. Lodge
- School of Education, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Jane M. Tiller
- Public Health Genomics, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Paul Lacaze
- Public Health Genomics, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Hayley Andersen
- Melanoma and Skin Cancer Advocacy Network, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - Gemma McErlean
- SWS Nursing and Midwifery Research Alliance, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
- School of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Erin Turbitt
- Discipline of Genetic Counselling, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - H. Peter Soyer
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Department of Dermatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Aideen M. McInerney-Leo
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Truong TM, Apfelbaum JL, Schierer E, Danahey K, Borden BA, Karrison T, Shahul S, Anitescu M, Gerlach R, Knoebel RW, Meltzer DO, Ratain MJ, O’Donnell PH. Anesthesia providers as stakeholders to adoption of pharmacogenomic information in perioperative care. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2022; 32:79-86. [PMID: 34570085 PMCID: PMC8940738 DOI: 10.1097/fpc.0000000000000455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Integration of pharmacogenomics into clinical care is being studied in multiple disciplines. We hypothesized that understanding attitudes and perceptions of anesthesiologists, critical care and pain medicine providers would uncover unique considerations for future implementation within perioperative care. METHODS A survey (multiple choice and Likert-scale) was administered to providers within our Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care prior to initiation of a department-wide prospective pharmacogenomics implementation program. The survey addressed knowledge, perceptions, experiences, resources and barriers. RESULTS Of 153 providers contacted, 149 (97%) completed the survey. Almost all providers (92%) said that genetic results influence drug therapy, and few (22%) were skeptical about the usefulness of pharmacogenomics. Despite this enthusiasm, 87% said their awareness about pharmacogenomic information is lacking. Feeling well-informed about pharmacogenomics was directly related to years in practice/experience: only 38% of trainees reported being well-informed, compared to 46% of those with 1-10 years of experience, and nearly two-thirds with 11+ years (P < 0.05). Regarding barriers, providers reported uncertainty about availability of testing, turnaround time and whether testing is worth financial costs. CONCLUSIONS Anesthesiology, critical care and pain medicine providers are optimistic about the potential clinical utility of pharmacogenomics, but are uncertain about practical aspects of testing and desire clear guidelines on the use of results. These findings may inform future institutional efforts toward greater integration of genomic results to improve medication-related outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tien M. Truong
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Committee on Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jeffrey L. Apfelbaum
- Committee on Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Emily Schierer
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Keith Danahey
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Center for Research Informatics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Brittany A. Borden
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Theodore Karrison
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sajid Shahul
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Magdalena Anitescu
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Rebecca Gerlach
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Randall W. Knoebel
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Mark J. Ratain
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Committee on Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Peter H. O’Donnell
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Committee on Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Selig DJ, Livezey JR, Chin GC, DeLuca JP, Guillory Ii WO, Kress AT, Oliver TO, Por ED. Prescription Patterns and Relationship to Pharmacogenomics Testing in the Military Health System. Mil Med 2021; 187:9-17. [PMID: 34967405 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usab481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Clinical utilization of pharmacogenomics (PGx) testing is highly institutionally dependent, and little information is known about provider practices of PGx testing in the Military Health System (MHS). In this study, we aimed to characterize Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) actionable prescription (Rx) patterns and their temporal relationship with PGx testing in the MHS. METHODS Using data from the Military Health System Management Analysis and Reporting Tool (M2) database, this retrospective cohort study included all patients receiving at least one PGx test and at least one CPIC actionable Rx from January 2015 to August 2020 (845 patients, 1,471 PGx, 7,725 index CPIC actionable Rxs). Rx patterns and temporal relationships with PGx testing were characterized via descriptive statistics. Binomial regression was used to determine which patient and provider characteristics were associated with a patient receiving a PGx test within 30 days of an index Rx. RESULTS Patients had a median of 9 index CPIC actionable Rx's (range 1-26). Pain medications were most commonly prescribed (N = 794, 94% patients with at least 1 Rx). However, pain medication had the lowest Rx-PGx match rate (40%) compared to an average of 62% Rx-PGx match rate for all CPIC drugs. Antidepressants were also commonly prescribed (N = 668, 79.1% patients with at least 1 Rx), and antidepressants had the highest Rx-PGx match rate of 86.7%. A minority of providers (20%, N = 249) ordered the majority of PGx tests (86.1%, N = 1,266) and only 8.3% of PGx tests (N = 398) matched to a CPIC actionable drug within 30 days of the test (defined by Rxs ordered within 30 days before or after the PGx test). However, approximately 39.8% of patients (N = 317) had at least one drug match to a PGx test within 30 days. The largest predictor of whether a patient received a PGx test within 30 days of any index Rx was whether or not a specific psychiatry provider ordered the PGx test (odds ratio; OR 3.7, 95% CI 2.13-6.54, P < 0.001). Neither the CPIC level of evidence nor FDA PGx actionable or informative labels had a significant effect on PGx test timing. CONCLUSIONS PGx testing was generally limited to high Rx-drug users and was found to be an under-utilized resource. PGx testing did not typically follow CPIC guidelines. Implementing PGx testing protocols, simplifying PGx test-ordering by incorporating at minimum CYP2D6, CYP2C19, and CYP2C9 into PGx-testing panels, and unifying providers' PGx knowledgebase in the MHS are feasible and would improve the clinical utilization of PGx tests in the MHS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Selig
- Experimental Therapeutics Department, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Livezey
- Clinical Pharmacology Department, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Geoffrey C Chin
- Experimental Therapeutics Department, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA
| | - Jesse P DeLuca
- Experimental Therapeutics Department, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA
| | - Walter O Guillory Ii
- The Internal Medicine Department, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Adrian T Kress
- Experimental Therapeutics Department, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA
| | - Thomas O Oliver
- Clinical Pharmacology Department, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Elaine D Por
- Experimental Therapeutics Department, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Por ED, Selig DJ, Chin GC, DeLuca JP, Oliver TG, Livezey JR. Evaluation of Pharmacogenomics Testing of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes in the Military Health System From 2015 to 2020. Mil Med 2021; 187:1-8. [PMID: 34967404 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usab098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Pharmacogenomics (PGx) plays a fundamental role in personalized medicine, providing an evidence-based treatment approach centered on the relationship between genomic variations and their effect on drug metabolism. Cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes are responsible for the metabolism of most clinically prescribed drugs and a major source of variability in drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. To assess the prevalence of PGx testing within the Military Health System (MHS), testing of specific CYP450 enzymes was evaluated. Data were retrospectively obtained from the Military Health System Management Analysis and Reporting Tool (M2) database. Patient demographics were identified for each test, along with TRICARE status, military treatment facility, clinic, and National Provider Identifier. A total of 929 patients received 1,833 PGx tests, predominantly composed of active duty/guard service members (N = 460; 49.5%), with highest testing rates in the army (51.5%). An even distribution in testing was observed among gender, with the highest rates in Caucasians (41.7%). Of the CYP enzymes assessed, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 accounted for 87.8% of all PGx CYP testing. The majority of patients were tested in psychiatry clinics (N = 496; 53.4%) and primary care clinics (N = 233; 25.1%), accounting for 56.4% and 24.8% of all tests, respectively. Testing was found to be provider driven, suggesting a lack of a standardized approach to PGx and its application in patient care within the MHS. We initially recommend targeted education and revising testing labels to be more uniform and informative. Long-term recommendations include establishing pharmacy-driven protocols and point-of-care PGx testing to optimize patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine D Por
- Experimental Therapeutics, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA
| | - Daniel J Selig
- Experimental Therapeutics, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA
| | - Geoffrey C Chin
- Experimental Therapeutics, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA
| | - Jesse P DeLuca
- Experimental Therapeutics, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA
| | - Thomas G Oliver
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Medical Toxicology, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Livezey
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Medical Toxicology, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Erdmann A, Rehmann-Sutter C, Bozzaro C. Patients' and professionals' views related to ethical issues in precision medicine: a mixed research synthesis. BMC Med Ethics 2021; 22:116. [PMID: 34465328 PMCID: PMC8406914 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00682-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Precision medicine development is driven by the possibilities of next generation sequencing, information technology and artificial intelligence and thus, raises a number of ethical questions. Empirical studies have investigated such issues from the perspectives of health care professionals, researchers and patients. We synthesize the results from these studies in this review. METHODS We used a systematic strategy to search, screen and assess the literature for eligibility related to our research question. The initial search for empirical studies in five data bases provided 665 different records and we selected 92 of these publications for inclusion in this review. Data were extracted in a spreadsheet and categorized into different topics representing the views on ethical issues in precision medicine. RESULTS Many patients and professionals expect high benefits from precision medicine and have a positive attitude towards it. However, patients and professionals also perceive some risks. Commonly perceived risks include: lack of evidence for accuracy of tests and efficacy of treatments; limited knowledge of patients, which makes informed consent more difficult; possible unavailability of access to precision medicine for underprivileged people and ethnic minorities; misuse of data by insurance companies and employers, potential of racial stigmatization due to genetic information; unwanted communication of incidental findings; changes in doctor-patient-relationship through focusing on data; and the problem that patients could feel under pressure to optimize their health. CONCLUSIONS National legislation and guidelines already minimize many risks associated with precision medicine. However, from our perspective some problems require more attention. Should hopes for precision medicine's benefits be fulfilled, then the ethical principle of justice would require an unlimited access to precision medicine for all people. The potential for autonomous patients' decisions must be greatly enhanced by improvements in patient education. Harm from test results must be avoided in any case by the highest possible data security level and communication guidelines. Changes in the doctor-patient relationship and the impact of precision medicine on the quality of life should be further investigated. Additionally, the cost-effectiveness of precision medicine should be further examined, in order to avoid malinvestment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anke Erdmann
- Institute for Experimental Medicine, Medical Ethics Working Group, Kiel University (CAU), Kiel, Germany.
| | | | - Claudia Bozzaro
- Institute for Experimental Medicine, Medical Ethics Working Group, Kiel University (CAU), Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shah SN, Gammal RS, Amato MG, Alobaidly M, Reyes DD, Hasan S, Seger DL, Krier JB, Bates DW. Clinical Utility of Pharmacogenomic Data Collected by a Health-System Biobank to Predict and Prevent Adverse Drug Events. Drug Saf 2021; 44:601-607. [PMID: 33620701 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-021-01050-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Medication-related harm represents a significant issue for patient safety and quality of care. One strategy to avoid preventable adverse drug events is to utilize patient-specific factors such as pharmacogenomics (PGx) to individualize therapy. OBJECTIVE We measured the number of patients enrolled in a health-system biobank with actionable PGx results who received relevant medications and assessed the incidence of adverse drug events (ADEs) that might have been prevented had the PGx results been used to inform prescribing. METHODS Patients with actionable PGx results in the following four genes with Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines were identified: HLA-A*31:01, HLA-B*15:02, TPMT, and VKORC1. The patients who received interacting medications (carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, thiopurines, or warfarin) were identified, and electronic health records were reviewed to determine the incidence of potentially preventable ADEs. RESULTS Of 36,424 patients with PGx results, 2327 (6.4%) were HLA-A*31:01 positive; 3543 (9.7%) were HLA-B*15:02 positive; 2893 (7.9%) were TPMT intermediate metabolizers; and 4249 (11.7%) were homozygous for the VKORC1 c.1639 G>A variant. Among patients positive for one of the HLA variants who received carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine (n = 92), four (4.3%) experienced a rash that warranted drug discontinuation. Among the TPMT intermediate metabolizers who received a thiopurine (n = 56), 11 (19.6%) experienced severe myelosuppression that warranted drug discontinuation. Among patients homozygous for the VKORC1 c.1639 G>A variant who received warfarin (n = 379), 85 (22.4%) experienced active bleeding and/or international normalized ratio (INR) > 5 that warranted drug discontinuation or dose reduction. CONCLUSION Patients with actionable PGx results from a health-system biobank who received relevant medications experienced predictable ADEs. These ADEs may have been prevented if the patients' PGx results were available in the electronic health record with clinical decision support prior to prescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonam N Shah
- Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 41 Avenue of Louis Pasteur, Office 103, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. .,Department of Pharmacy Practice, MCPHS University School of Pharmacy, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Roseann S Gammal
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, MCPHS University School of Pharmacy, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mary G Amato
- Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 41 Avenue of Louis Pasteur, Office 103, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.,Department of Pharmacy Practice, MCPHS University School of Pharmacy, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maryam Alobaidly
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, MCPHS University School of Pharmacy, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dariel Delos Reyes
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, MCPHS University School of Pharmacy, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah Hasan
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, MCPHS University School of Pharmacy, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Diane L Seger
- Clinical Quality Analysis, Partners Healthcare, Somerville, MA, USA
| | - Joel B Krier
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David W Bates
- Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 41 Avenue of Louis Pasteur, Office 103, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.,Clinical Quality Analysis, Partners Healthcare, Somerville, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|