Usefulness of ICU criteria for diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in nonhematologic critically ill patients

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of pleural aspergillosis: a review of 13 cases

Aspergillus pleurisy is a rare complication of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), which mostly occurs in the immunocompromised host. The clinical condition is critical, especially to those who develop bronchopleural fistula. This study aimed to assess the characteristics and the prognosis of aspergillus pleurisy. Clinical data from 13 patients diagnosed with aspergillus pleurisy in our hospital from January 2000 to December 2022 were retrospectively studied. Thirteen patients with Aspergillus pleurisy were included. There were 10 males and 3 females, with a median age of 65 (range: 18-79) years. Bronchopleural fistula was present in eight patients. A proven diagnosis of Aspergillus pleurisy was based on positive pleural fluid culture in seven cases and histopathological examination of pleural biopsies in six cases. Four patients refused further treatment and were discharged from the hospital against medical advice. Nine cases recovered and were discharged after multiple antifungal treatments (systemic and topical antifungal therapies, pleural drainage and irrigation, and surgical repair). During follow-up, one patient, who suffered underlying bronchiectasis, died of massive hemoptysis 2 years after discharge. The remaining eight cases are still under close follow-up, with a median follow-up of 5.4 (range: 1.3-18.9) years. The prognosis of aspergillus pleurisy complicated with bronchopleural fistula is poor. Thoracic surgery, especially lung resection, is a risk factor associated with the incidence of Aspergillus pleurisy. Systemic antifungal therapy and adequate pleural irrigation could improve the prognosis.

IMPORTANCE

Aspergillus pleurisy is a rare complication of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), associated with a poor prognosis. The morbidity and mortality of this condition have not been thoroughly studied, and recent research on this topic is limited. The current study included 13 patients diagnosed with Aspergillus pleurisy, with the majority presenting concomitantly with a bronchopleural fistula. Among these patients, nine had a history of thoracic surgery, including lung transplantation and lobectomy. Four patients refused further treatment and were discharged against medical advice, while one patient succumbed to massive hemoptysis 2 years after discharge. This case series provides essential insights into Aspergillus pleurisy and evaluates the therapeutic strategy based on a limited cohort.

A Comparison of Diagnostic Criteria for Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Critically Ill Patients

INTRODUCTION

Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) is a common infection in intensive care units (ICUs). There are no consensus criteria for defining IPA in the ICU. We aimed to compare the diagnosis and prognosis performances of three criteria (the 2020 EORTC/MSG criteria, the 2021 EORTC/MSG ICU criteria, the modified AspICU criteria (M-AspICU)) for IPA in the ICU.

METHODS

In this retrospective study from our single center, we applied the three different criteria for IPA in patients with suspected pneumonia and undergoing at least one mycological test between November 10, 2016 and November 10, 2021. We compared the diagnosis agreement and prognosis performances of these three criteria in the ICU.

RESULTS

Overall, 2403 patients were included. The rates of IPA according to the 2020 EORTC/MSG, 2021 EORTC/MSG ICU, and M-AspICU were 3.37%, 6.53%, and 23.10%, respectively. Diagnostic agreement among these criteria was poor (Cohen's kappa 0.208-0.666). IPA diagnosed by either the 2020 EORTC/MSG (odds ratio = 2.709, P < 0.001) or the 2021 EORTC/MSG ICU (odds ratio = 2.086, P = 0.001) criteria was independently associated with 28-day mortality. IPA diagnosed by M-AspICU is an independent risk factor of 28-day mortality (odds ratio = 1.431, P = 0.031) when excluding patients who fulfilled neither host criteria nor radiological factors of 2021 EORTC/MSG ICU.

CONCLUSIONS

Although M-AspICU criteria have the highest "sensitivity", IPA diagnosed by M-AspICU was not an independent risk factor of 28-day mortality. Caution is required when using the M-AspICU criteria in ICU, especially in patients with non-specific infiltration and non-classical host factors.

Diagnostic performance of mycological tests for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in non-haematological patients: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Increasing numbers of patients with non-haematological diseases are infected with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), with a high mortality reported which is mainly due to delayed diagnosis. The diagnostic capability of mycological tests for IPA including galactomannan test, (1,3)-β-D-glucan test, lateral flow assay, lateral flow device and PCR for the non-haematological patients remains unknown. This protocol aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of mycological tests to facilitate the early diagnosis and treatments of IPA in non-haematological diseases.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Database including PubMed, CENTRAL and EMBASE will be searched from 2002 until the publication of results. Cohort or cross-sectional studies that assessing the diagnostic capability of mycological tests for IPA in patients with non-haematological diseases will be included. The true-positive, false-positive, true-negative and false-negative of each test will be extracted and pooled in bivariate random-effects model, by which the sensitivity and specificity will be calculated with 95% CI. The second outcomes will include positive (negative) likelihood ratio, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and diagnostic OR will also be computed in the bivariate model. When applicable, subgroup analysis will be performed with several prespecified covariates to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. Factors that may impact the diagnostic effects of mycological tests will be examined by sensitivity analysis. The risk of bias will be appraised by the Quality Assessment tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This protocol is not involved with ethics approval, and the results will be peer-reviewed and disseminated on a recognised journal.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021241820.