Effective Therapy of Tocilizumab on Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Associated Refractory Macrophage Activation Syndrome

Tailoring the treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases by a better stratification and characterization of the clinical patient heterogeneity. Findings from a systematic literature review and experts' consensus

Inflammatory rheumatic diseases are different pathologic conditions associated with a deregulated immune response, codified along a spectrum of disorders, with autoinflammatory and autoimmune diseases as two-end phenotypes of this continuum. Despite pathogenic differences, inflammatory rheumatic diseases are commonly managed with a limited number of immunosuppressive drugs, sometimes with partial evidence or transferring physicians' knowledge in different patients. In addition, several randomized clinical trials, enrolling these patients, did not meet the primary pre-established outcomes and these findings could be linked to the underlying molecular diversities along the spectrum of inflammatory rheumatic disorders. In fact, the resulting patient heterogeneity may be driven by differences in underlying molecular pathology also resulting in variable responses to immunosuppressive drugs. Thus, the identification of different clinical subsets may possibly overcome the major obstacles that limit the development more effective therapeutic strategies for these patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. This clinical heterogeneity could require a diverse therapeutic management to improve patient outcomes and increase the frequency of clinical remission. Therefore, the importance of better patient stratification and characterization is increasingly pointed out according to the precision medicine principles, also suggesting a new approach for disease treatment. In fact, based on a better proposed patient profiling, clinicians could more appropriately balance the therapeutic management. On these bases, we synthetized and discussed the available literature about the patient profiling in regard to therapy in the context of inflammatory rheumatic diseases, mainly focusing on randomized clinical trials. We provided an overview of the importance of a better stratification and characterization of the clinical heterogeneity of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases identifying this point as crucial in improving the management of these patients.

Single center clinical analysis of macrophage activation syndrome complicating juvenile rheumatic diseases

BACKGROUND

Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), an example of secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, is a potentially fatal complication of rheumatic diseases. We aimed to study the clinical and laboratory characteristics, treatment schemes, and outcomes of different rheumatic disorders associated with MAS in children. Early warning indicators of MAS have also been investigated to enable clinicians to make a prompt and accurate diagnosis.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients with rheumatic diseases complicated by MAS were enrolled between January 2017 and December 2022. Clinical and laboratory data were collected before disease onset, at diagnosis, and after treatment with MAS, and data were compared between patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), Kawasaki disease (KD), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). A random forest model was established to show the importance score of each variable with a significant difference.

RESULTS

Most (81.8%) instances of MAS occurred during the initial diagnosis of the underlying disease. Compared to the active stage of sJIA, the platelet count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and fibrinogen level in sJIA-MAS were significantly decreased, whereas ferritin, ferritin/erythrocyte sedimentation rate, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, and D-dimer levels were significantly increased. Ferritin level, ferritin/erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and platelet count had the greatest predictive value for sJIA-MAS. The level of IL-18 in the sJIA-MAS group was significantly higher than in the active sJIA group, whereas IL-6 levels were significantly lower. Most patients with MAS were treated with methylprednisolone pulse combined with cyclosporine, and no deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Thrombocytopenia, ferritin levels, the ferritin/erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and elevated aspartate aminotransferase levels can predict the occurrence of MAS in patients with sJIA. Additionally, our analysis indicates that IL-18 plays an important role in the pathogenesis of MAS in sJIA-MAS.

Comparative efficacy and safety of different drugs in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to estimate the relative efficacy and safety of different biological agents (infliximab, canakinumab, baricitinib, anakinra, adalimumab, tofacitinib, tocilizumab, and rilonacept) compared with placebo for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients, through a network meta-analysis.

METHODS

Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from database inception to July 2023 for randomized controlled trials comparing different biological agents (infliximab, canakinumab, baricitinib, anakinra, adalimumab, tofacitinib, tocilizumab, and rilonacept) or placebo directly or indirectly in JIA. Bayesian network meta-analyses were conducted. Data was extracted and analyzed by R with gemtc package. The treatment options were ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value.

RESULTS

We identified 10 randomized controlled trials and analyzed 898 participants. Canakinumab (odds ratio 55.0, 95% credible intervals 2.4-67.0) was more effective than the placebo, and the difference was statistically significant. However, there was no statistical significance between other drugs versus placebo in terms of the modified ACRpedi30 (P > .05). The SUCRA shows that canakinumab ranked first (SUCRA, 86.9%), anakinra ranked second (SUCRA, 77.7%), adalimumab ranked third (SUCRA, 61.9%), and placebo ranked the last (SUCRA, 6.3%). Nevertheless, there were no notable discrepancies in the occurrence of adverse events, hepatic-related adverse events, infectious adverse event, serious adverse events, and serious infection following treatment with canakinumab, anakinra, tocilizumab, rilonacept, or the placebo. Based on the clustergram of modified ACRpedi30 and adverse events, canakinumab is suggested for JIA according to the surface under SUCRAs considering the symptom and adverse events simultaneously.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with JIA, canakinumab exhibited the highest likelihood of being the optimal treatment for achieving the modified ACRpedi30 response rate, and neither of the tested biological agents carried a significant risk of serious adverse events.

Case Report: Refractory macrophage activation syndrome requiring high-dose anakinra, emapalumab, and etoposide therapy in early-onset systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated with adenoviremia

Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) is a life-threatening condition characterized by the excessive stimulation of macrophages and T lymphocytes, provoked by infections, malignancy, and autoimmune or autoinflammatory conditions such as systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA). Clinical signs of sJIA may include high-spiking, quotidian fevers, lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, and a salmon-colored migratory, evanescent rash. By contrast, MAS is characterized by unremitting fevers and diffuse, fixed, maculopapular rashes. In addition to hepatosplenomegaly and lymphadenopathy, patients with MAS may also have clinical signs of coagulopathy, as well as cardiac, lung, renal, and central nervous system dysfunction. The empiric treatment for MAS is initially high-dose IV corticosteroids, but usually requires addition of immunomodulators such as tacrolimus or a biologic such as Anakinra to control. The addition of immunotherapies for MAS has improved patient outcomes. We present a 2-year-old male patient with a history of early-onset sJIA, who presented with MAS refractory to corticosteroids and anakinra triggered by adenoviremia that required addition of emapalumab to control. We believe this is the first reported case of a combination of immunosuppressive therapy of emapalumab, etoposide, anakinra, tacrolimus, and corticosteroids used in the successful treatment of infection-induced MAS in early-onset sJIA. Given the lack of treatment guidelines and approved therapies for MAS, alternative strategies should be considered for patients with an intractable course.

The History of Macrophage Activation Syndrome in Autoimmune Diseases

In 1979, it became recognized in the literature that what we call hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) was a nonmalignant disease of histiocytes. Subsequently a familial form and a secondary form of HLH were differentiated. When HLH is secondary to an autoimmune disease, rheumatologists refer to this entity as macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) to differentiate it from HLH itself. Although the first cases of MAS likely appeared in the literature in the 1970s, it was not until 1985 that the term activated macrophages was used to describe patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) complicated by MAS and the term macrophage activation syndrome first appeared in the title of a paper in 1993.MAS is one of the many types of secondary HLH and should not be confused with primary HLH. Experience has taught that MAS secondary to different autoimmune diseases is not equal. In the 30 years since initial description in patients with sJIA, the clinical spectrum, diseases associated with MAS, therapy, and understanding the pathogenesis have all made significant gains. The diagnostic/classification criteria for MAS secondary to sJIA, SLE, RA, and KD differ based on the different laboratory abnormalities associated with each (Ahn et al., J Rheumatol 44:996-1003, 2017; Han et al., Ann Rheum Dis 75:e44, 2016; Ravelli et al., Ann Rheum Dis 75:481-489, 2016; Borgia et al., Arthritis Rheumatol 70:616-624, 2018). These examples include the thrombocytosis associated with sJIA, a chronic generalized activation of the immune system, leading to elevations of fibrinogen and sIL-2R, low platelet count associated with SLE, and more acute inflammation associated with KD. Therefore, individual diagnostic criteria are required, and they all differ from the diagnostic criteria for HLH, which are based on a previously non-activated immune system (Ahn et al., J Rheumatol 44:996-1003, 2017; Han et al., Ann Rheum Dis 75:e44, 2016; Ravelli et al., Ann Rheum Dis 75:481-489, 2016; Borgia et al., Arthritis Rheumatol 70:616-624, 2018; Henter et al., Pediatr Blood Cancer 48:124-131, 2007). This helps to explain why the HLH diagnostic criteria do not perform well in MAS.The initial treatment remains high-dose steroids and IVIG followed by the use of a calcineurin inhibitor for resistant cases. IVIG can be used if there is a concern about malignancy to wait for appropriate investigations or with steroids. Interluekin-1 inhibition is now the next therapy if there is a failure to respond to steroids and calcineurin inhibitors. Advances in understanding the mechanisms leading to MAS, which has been greatly aided by the use of mouse models of MAS and advances in genome sequencing, offer a bright future for more specific therapies. More recent therapies are directed to specific cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of MAS and can lead to decreases in the morbidity and mortality associated with MAS. These include therapies directed to inhibiting the JAK/STAT pathway and/or specific cytokines, interleukin-18 and gamma interferon, which are currently being studied in MAS. These more specific therapies may obviate the need for nonspecific immunosuppressive therapies including high-dose prolonged steroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and etoposide.

Cytokine Storm Syndrome Associated with Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

The cytokine storm syndrome (CSS) associated with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) has widely been referred to as macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). In this chapter, we use the term sJIA-associated CSS (sJIA-CSS) when referring to this syndrome and use the term MAS when referencing publications that specifically report on sJIA-associated MAS.

The latest advances in the use of biological DMARDs to treat Still's disease

INTRODUCTION

Currently, the therapeutic management of Still's disease, a multisystemic inflammatory rare disorder, is directed to target the inflammatory symptoms and signs of patients. The treatment varies from glucocorticoids to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), both conventional synthetic and biological (bDMARDs). Usually, in refractory patients, bDMARDs are administered.

AREAS COVERED

Among bDMARDs, IL-1 and IL-6 inhibitors are frequently used, as data reported from both clinical trials and 'real-life' experiences. Recently, innovative therapeutic strategies have suggested an early administration of bDMARDs to increase the rate of clinical response and drug-free remission. Some new targets have been also proposed targeting IL-18, IFN-γ, and JAK/STAT pathway, which could be applied to Still's disease and its life-threatening evolution.

EXPERT OPINION

Many lines of evidence improved the knowledge about the therapeutic management of Still's disease with bDMARDs. However, many unmet needs may be still highlighted which could provide the basis to arrange further specific research in increasing the rate of clinical response. In fact, Still's disease remains a highly heterogeneous disease suggesting possible diverse underlying pathogenic mechanisms, at least partially, and consequent different therapeutic strategies. A better patient stratification may help in arranging specific studies to improve the long-term outcome of Still's disease.

Monocytic Phagocytes in the Immunopathogenesis of Cytokine Storm Syndromes

Cytokine storm syndromes (CSSs) are caused by a dysregulated host immune response to an inciting systemic inflammatory trigger. This maladaptive and harmful immune response culminates in collateral damage to host tissues resulting in life-threatening multisystem organ failure. Knowledge of the various immune cells that contribute to CSS pathogenesis has improved dramatically in the past decade. Monocytes, dendritic cells, and macrophages, collective known as monocytic phagocytes, are well-positioned within the immune system hierarchy to make key contributions to the initiation, propagation, and amplification of the hyperinflammatory response in CSS. The plasticity of monocytic phagocytes also makes them prime candidates for mediating immunoregulatory and tissue-healing functions in patients who recover from cytokine storm-mediated immunopathology. Therefore, approaches to manipulate the myriad functions of monocytic phagocytes may improve the clinical outcome of CSS.

Higher dietary phytochemical index is associated with lower odds of knee osteoarthritis

Previous studies have shown that adherence to dietary patterns rich in plant-based foods may reduce the odds of osteoarthritis; however, limited data are available on the association of consumption of diets rich in phytochemicals and odds of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). In this case–control study conducted in Iran, we aimed to investigate whether a higher dietary phytochemical index (DPI) is associated with decreased odds of having KOA. A total of 124 cases aged 20–60 years diagnosed with bilateral primary KOA according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria and 124 controls frequency-matched on age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) were included in the study. A validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was used to collect information on dietary intakes. To calculate DPI scores, the dietary energy derived from foods rich in phytochemicals (kcal) was divided by the participant’s total daily energy intake (kcal). Patients with KOA had lower intakes of dietary fiber (P = 0.004), vitamin A (P = 0.007), vitamin C (P = 0.001), and folate (P = 0.021) compared to controls. In the crude model, individuals in the third tertile of DPI had 65% lower odds of having KOA compared to those in the first tertile (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.67, P-trend = 0.001). After adjustment for potential confounders, including age, sex, physical activity, smoking, and supplement use, this inverse association remained significant (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.73, P-trend = 0.004). After further adjustment for BMI, this inverse association between DPI and odds of KOA also remained significant (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.69, P-trend = 0.003). These findings suggest that adherence to a phytochemical-rich diet, as indicated by the increasing DPI score, is associated with lower odds of KOA.