Butyrate induced accumulation of a 2.3 kb polyadenylated H1(0) histone mRNA in HeLa cells

Effect of Culture Supernatant of Clostridium butyricum TO-A on Human DNA-Repair-Factor-Encoding Gene Promoters

In this study, Clostridium butyricum TO-A culture supernatant (CBCS) or butyric acid was added to a culture medium of human cervical carcinoma HeLa S3 cells, and changes in DNA-repair-related gene promoter activities were investigated. The HeLa S3 cells were transfected with a luciferase (Luc) expression vector containing approximately 500 bp of the 5'-upstream region of several human DNA-repair-related genes and cultured with a medium containing the CBCS (10%) or butyric acid (2.5 mM). The cells were harvested after 19 to 42 h of incubation. A Luc assay revealed that the human ATM, PARG, PARP1, and RB1 gene promoter activities were significantly increased. A Western blot analysis showed that the amounts of the proteins encoded by these genes markedly increased. Furthermore, 8, 24, and 48 h after the addition of the CBCS (10%), total RNA was extracted and subjected to RNAseq analysis. The results showed that the expression of several inflammation- and DNA-replication/repair-related genes, including NFKB and the MCM gene groups, decreased markedly after 8 h. However, the expression of the histone genes increased after 24 h. Elucidation of the mechanism by which the CBCS and butyrate affect the expression of genes that encode DNA-repair-associated proteins may contribute to the prevention of carcinogenesis, the risk of which rises in accordance with aging.

Changes in chromatin accessibility landscape and histone H3 core acetylation during valproic acid-induced differentiation of embryonic stem cells

Directed differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) or induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) provides powerful models to dissect the molecular mechanisms leading to the formation of specific cell lineages. Treatment with histone deacetylase inhibitors can significantly enhance the efficiency of directed differentiation. However, the mechanisms are not well understood. Here, we use CUT&RUN in combination with ATAC-seq to determine changes in both histone modifications and genome-wide chromatin accessibility following valproic acid (VPA) exposure. VPA induced a significant increase in global histone H3 acetylation (H3K56ac), a core histone modification affecting nucleosome stability, as well as enrichment at loci associated with cytoskeletal organization and cellular morphogenesis. In addition, VPA altered the levels of linker histone H1 subtypes and the total histone H1/nucleosome ratio indicative of initial differentiation events. Notably, ATAC-seq analysis revealed changes in chromatin accessibility of genes involved in regulation of CDK serine/threonine kinase activity and DNA duplex unwinding. Importantly, changes in chromatin accessibility were evident at several key genomic loci, such as the pluripotency factor Lefty, cardiac muscle troponin Tnnt2, and the homeodomain factor Hopx, which play critical roles in cardiomyocyte differentiation. Massive parallel transcription factor (TF) footprinting also indicates an increased occupancy of TFs involved in differentiation toward mesoderm and endoderm lineages and a loss of footprints of POU5F1/SOX2 pluripotency factors following VPA treatment. Our results provide the first genome-wide analysis of the chromatin landscape following VPA-induced differentiation in mESCs and provide new mechanistic insight into the intricate molecular processes that govern departure from pluripotency and early lineage commitment.

Towards understanding the Regulation of Histone H1 Somatic Subtypes with OMICs

Histone H1 is involved in the regulation of chromatin higher-order structure and compaction. In humans, histone H1 is a multigene family with seven subtypes differentially expressed in somatic cells. Which are the regulatory mechanisms that determine the variability of the H1 complement is a long-standing biological question regarding histone H1. We have used a new approach based on the integration of OMICs data to address this issue. We have examined the 3D-chromatin structure, the binding of transcription factors (TFs), and the expression of somatic H1 genes in human cell lines, using data from public repositories, such as ENCODE. Analysis of Hi-C, ChIP-seq, and RNA-seq data, have revealed that transcriptional control has a greater impact on H1 regulation than previously thought. Somatic H1 genes located in topologically associated domains (TADs) show higher expression than in boundary regions. H1 genes are targeted by a variable number of transcription factors including cell cycle-related TFs, and tissue-specific TFs, suggesting a fine-tuned, subtype-specific transcriptional control. We describe, for the first time, that all H1 somatic subtypes are under transcriptional co-regulation. The replication-independent subtypes, which are encoded in different chromosomes isolated from other histone genes, are also co-regulated with the rest of the somatic H1 genes, indicating that transcriptional co-regulation extends beyond the histone cluster. Transcriptional control and transcriptional co-regulation explain, at least in part, the variability of H1 complement, the fluctuations of H1 subtypes during development, and also the compensatory effects observed, in model systems, after perturbation of one or more H1 subtypes.

Histone H1 and its isoforms: contribution to chromatin structure and function

The lysine-rich H1 histone family in mammals includes eleven different subtypes, and thus it is the most divergent class of histone proteins. The central globular H1 domain asymmetrically interacts with DNA at the exit or entry end of the nucleosomal core DNA, and the C-terminal domain has a major impact on the linker DNA conformation and chromatin condensation. H1 histones are thus involved in the formation of higher order chromatin structures, and they modulate the accessibility of regulatory proteins, chromatin remodeling factors and histone modification enzymes to their target sites. The major posttranslational modification of H1 histones is phosphorylation, which reaches a peak during G2 and mitosis. Phosphorylation is, however, also involved in the control of DNA replication and it contributes to the regulation of gene expression. Disruption of linker histone genes, initially performed in order to delineate subtype-specific functions, revealed that disruption of one or two H1 subtype genes is quantitatively compensated by an increased expression of other subtypes. This suggests a functional redundancy among H1 subtypes. However, the inactivation of three subtypes and the reduction of the H1 moiety in half finally resulted in a phenotypic effect. On the other hand, studies on the role of particular subtypes at specific developmental stages in lower eukaryotes, but also in vertebrates suggest that specific subtypes of H1 participate in particular systems of gene regulation.

Characterisation of human histone H1x

The members of the H1 histone family can be classified into three groups, which are the main class subtypes expressed in somatic cells, the developmental- and tissue-specific subtypes, and the replacement subtype H1(o). Until now, the subtype H1x was not classified, since it has not yet been thoroughly examined. The results of this study show that H1x shares similarities but also exhibits slight differences in its biochemical behaviour in comparison to the main class H1 histones. In HeLa cells it is located in the nucleus and partially associated with nucleosomes. Nevertheless, it is, like H1(o), mainly located in chromatin regions that are not affected by micrococcal nuclease digestion. Further common features of H1x and the replacement histone H1(o) are that the genes of both subtypes are solitarily located and give rise to polyadenylated mRNA. However, comparison of the inducibility of their expression revealed that their genes are regulated differentially.

Growth regulation of human variant histone genes and acetylation of the encoded proteins

The family of human histone genes consists of replication-dependent and independent subtypes. The replication-independent histone genes, also known as variants, give rise to distinct mRNAs, whose expression is regulated depending on the growth state of the cell, tissue type and developmental stage. In turn, the histone variants are differentially synthesized and modified by acetylation. Consequently, chromatin structure is altered resulting in complex changes in gene expression. The high conservation among histone protein subtypes suggests that they are indispensable. In addition, conservation of the positions of acetylation within subtypes suggests that the location of these sites is functionally important for the eukaryotic cell. For example, the structures of transcriptionally active and repressed chromatin are different depending on the acetylation state of histone proteins [1-3]. In addition, transcriptionally active and repressed chromatin contains distinct histone variants [4]. Specialized histone variants are targeted to the centromere of the chromosome, where they are essential for chromosome segregation [5]. Other specialized histones exist that are essential for development [6]. Changes in histone acetylation have been implicated in the down-regulation of a tumour suppressor gene in human breast cancer [7]. Acetylation also plays an important role in X chromosome inactivation as well as hormone-mediated transcriptional regulation [8, 9]. We propose here a novel model for histone variant gene regulation at the post-transcriptional level, which provides the groundwork to define the pathways regulating the synthesis of these variants.

Quantitative analysis of histone H1 degrees protein synthesis in HTC cells

H1 degrees, a member of histone H1 family associated with cell growth arrest and differentiation, is barely expressed in most mammalian cells in culture. Depending on the cell type, serum deprivation or drugs, such as sodium butyrate, significantly increase H1 degrees mRNA level and H1 degrees protein accumulates. However, probably because of a lack of a simple quantitative procedure, little is known about the relationship between H1 degrees mRNA content and its effective translation rate. Using a rat hepatoma cell line and sodium butyrate as a model system, we attempted to evaluate this in different cellular conditions by measuring H1 degrees synthesis with a rapid quantitative procedure we described previously. We found that although the amount of H1 degrees mRNA rapidly increased and then stabilized under sodium butyrate treatment, its transcription was delayed and H1 degrees protein was synthesized in a progressive wave. Butyrate removal from cell culture confirmed that mRNA level and protein synthesis were independently regulated, and provided evidence that sodium butyrate would not directly target the translation apparatus. In contrast, during the S phase of the cell cycle, H1 degrees gene transcription and protein synthesis were concomitantly activated. Taken together these data provide evidence that H1 degrees accumulation results from an increase of its synthesis and that, depending on conditions, a cell exhibits a H1 degrees translation efficiency which may or may not reflect the mRNA level.

Identification of a new family of higher eukaryotic histone deacetylases. Coordinate expression of differentiation-dependent chromatin modifiers

The histone deacetylase domain of almost all members of higher eukaryotic histone deacetylases already identified (HDAC family) is highly homologous to that of yeast RPD3. In this paper we report the cloning of two cDNAs encoding members of a new family of histone deacetylase in mouse that show a better homology to yeast HDA1 histone deacetylase. These cDNAs encode relatively large proteins, presenting an in vitro trichostatin A-sensitive histone deacetylase activity. Interestingly, one, mHDA2, encodes a protein with two putative deacetylase domains, and the other, mHDA1, contains only one deacetylase homology domain, located at the C-terminal half of the protein. Our data showed that these newly identified genes could belong to a network of genes coordinately regulated and involved in the remodeling of chromatin during cell differentiation. Indeed, the expression of mHDA1 and mHDA2 is tightly linked to the state of cell differentiation, behaving therefore like the histone H1 degrees-encoding gene. Moreover, like histone H1(0) gene, mHDA1 and mHDA2 gene expression is induced upon deacetylase inhibitor treatment. We postulate the existence of a regulatory mechanism, commanding a coordinate expression of a group of genes involved in the remodeling of chromatin not only during cell differentiation but also after abnormal histone acetylation.

The human H2A and H2B histone gene complement

Sequences and expression patterns of newly isolated human histone H2A and H2B genes and the respective proteins were compared with previously isolated human H2A and H2B genes and proteins. Altogether, 15 human H2A genes and 17 human H2B genes have been identified. 14 of these are organized as H2A/H2B gene pairs, while one H2A gene and three H2B genes are solitary genes. Two H2A genes and two H2B genes turned outto be pseudogenes. The 13 H2A genes code for at least 6 different amino acid sequences, and the 15 H2B genes encode 11 different H2B isoforms. Each H2A/H2B gene pair is controlled by a divergent promoter spanning 300 to 330 nucleotides between the coding regions of the two genes. The highly conserved divergent H2A/H2B promoters can be classified in two groups based on the patterns of consensus sequence elements. Group I promoters contain a TATA box for each gene, two Oct-1 factor binding sites, and three CCAAT boxes. Group II promoters contain the same elements as group I promoters and an additional CCAAT box, a binding motif for E2F and adjacent a highly conserved octanucleotide (CACAGCTT) that has not been described so far. Five of the 6 gene pairs and 4 solitary genes with group I promoters are localized in the large histone gene cluster at 6p21.3-6p22, and one gene pair is located at 1q21. All group II promoter associated genes are contained within the histone gene subcluster at D6S105, which is located at a distance of about 2 Mb from the major subcluster at 6p21.3-6p22 containing histone genes with group I promoters. Almost all group II H2A genes encode identical amino acid sequences, whereas group I H2A gene products vary at several positions. Using human cell lines, we have analyzed the expression patterns of functional human H2A/H2B gene pairs organized within the two histone gene clusters on the short arm of chromosome 6. The genes show varying expression patterns in different tumor cell lines.

The histone H1(0) contains multiple sequence elements for nuclear targeting

We have investigated the nuclear transport of the replacement histone H1(0) and have searched for its nuclear localization sequence (NLS). The lysine-rich H1(0) histone differs from the other H1 histones with respect to its mode of expression and to the processing of the respective mRNA. Using the digitonin-permeabilized cell import assay we demonstrate that H1(0) is transported into the nucleus in an energy- and temperature-dependent manner. In competition experiments we show that the transport of H1(0) from the cytoplasm into the nucleus is competed by the SV40 T-antigen-NLS-peptide coupled to HSA, an established substrate of the importin pathway. In transfection studies we have expressed in HeLa cells a series of plasmid constructs containing different fragments of the coding region of the H1(0) histone gene that were fused to the beta-galactosidase gene, and we have determined the subcellular localization of each fusion protein. The results show that H1(0) contains multiple transport-competent sequence elements that can function as NLS and that H1(0) meets the requirements for a transport into the nucleus by an importin-dependent pathway.

The microheterogeneity of the mammalian H1(0) histone. Evidence for an age-dependent deamidation

Histone H1(0) is known to consist of two subfractions named H1(0)a and H1(0)b. The present work was performed with the aim of elucidating the nature of these two subfractions. By using reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography in combination with hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography, we fractionated human histone H1(0) into even four subfractions. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatographic analysis of the peptide fragments obtained after cleavage with cyanogen bromide and digestion with chymotrypsin suggested that the four H1(0) subfractions differ only in their small N-terminal end of the H1(0) molecule (30 residues). Edman degradation of the N-terminal H1(0) peptide fragments and mass spectra analysis have indicated that human histone H1(0) consists of intact histones H1(0) (named H1(0) Asn-3) and deamidated H1(0) forms (H1(0) Asp-3) having an aspartic acid residue at position 3 instead of asparagine. Moreover, both H1(0) Asn-3 and H1(0) Asp-3 are blocked (H1(0)a Asn-3, H1(0)a Asp-3) and unblocked (H1(0)b Asn-3, H1(0)b Asp-3) on their N terminus. Acid-urea gel electrophoretic analysis has shown that the histone subfraction, in the literature originally named H1(0)a, actually consists of a mixture of H1(0)a Asn-3 and H1(0)a Asp-3, whereas H1(0)b consists of H1(0)b Asn-3 and H1(0)b Asp-3. Furthermore, we found that hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography separates rat and mouse histone H1(0) just like human H1(0) into four subfractions. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatographic analysis of brain and liver histone H1(0) from rats of different ages revealed an age-dependent increase of both the N-terminally acetylated and the deamidated forms of H1(0). In addition, we found that the relative proportions of the four forms of H1(0) histones differ from tissue to tissue.

Poly A-containing histone H4 mRNA variant (H4-v. 1): isolation and sequence determination from bovine adrenal medulla

A histone H4 cDNA variant (H4-v.1) was cloned from a bovine adrenal medullary phage library using PCR as a method of detection. The isolated clones contained a short 5' untranslated region (UTR) followed by the histone H4 coding region and a long atypical 3'UTR. The 3'UTR comprised the palindromic and purine-rich sequences typical of cell-cycle dependent histone mRNAs, and a 1.1 kb extension downstream of the palindromic sequence ending with a poly(A) track typical of cell-cycle independent histone mRNAs. Northern blot and RT-PCR analyses indicate that the transcript is fully expressed in bovine adrenal medulla. Thus, bovine histone H4-v.1 mRNA represents the first example of a histone H4 transcript that contains both 3'UTR characteristics of cell-cycle dependent and cell-cycle independent histone mRNAs.

Histone gene expression and chromatin structure during spermatogenesis

The chromatin of male germ cells is restructured throughout spermatogenesis. Analysis of differential histone protein patterns at specific stages of spermatogenesis may contribute towards an understanding of the changes in chromatin structure and function during this differentiation process. The most striking changes in histone patterns occur at the stage of pachytene spermatocytes when most of the linker H1 histones are replaced by the testis specific subtype H1t. In addition, replacement of core histone subtypes is observed at this stage. These structural changes precede the reorganization of chromatin at haploid stages when histones are replaced first by transition proteins and then by protamines.

Differential expression of the murine histone genes H3.3A and H3.3B

The histone family of proteins is subdivided into two major groups: the main type histones, which are synthesized in coordination with DNA replication during the S-phase of the cell cycle, and the replacement histones, which can be synthesized in the absence of DNA replication substituting main type histone isoforms. Accumulation of replacement histone variants has been observed in several terminally differentiated tissues that have stopped cell division. The replacement subtype of the H3 class is termed H3.3. This protein is encoded by two different genes (H3.3A and H3.3B) that both code for the same amino acid sequence, but differ in nucleotide sequences and gene organization. This has been shown for human and avian H3.3A and H3.3B genes and for a murine H3.3B cDNA. In an attempt to define patterns of replacement histone H3.3 gene expression during male germ cell differentiation, we have constructed mouse testicular cDNA libraries and have isolated cDNAs corresponding to the murine H3.3A and H3.3B genes. Using probes specific for these two different genes we show by RNase protection analysis and by nonradioactive in situ hybridization with testis sections that H3.3A mRNA is present in pre- and postmeiotic cells, whereas expression of the H3.3B gene is essentially restricted to cells of the meiotic prophase.

The effects of sodium butyrate on transcription are mediated through activation of a protein phosphatase

In this study we have investigated the molecular mechanism by which sodium butyrate modulates gene expression when added to cultured cells. As a model system we used hepatoma tissue culture cells in which sodium butyrate treatment increases histone H1(0) mRNA level and decreases c-myc mRNA level. Because we observed that stimulation of histone H1(0) gene expression could take place in the absence of protein neosynthesis, we hypothesized that sodium butyrate induced a post-translational modification of a factor involved in the transcription process. Using different types of well known kinase and phosphatase inhibitors, we studied the implication of kinase or phosphatase activity in this pathway. Interestingly, cell treatment with potent serine-threonine-phosphatase inhibitors, calyculin A or okadaic acid, prevented the regulation of both histone H1(0) and c-myc gene expressions by sodium butyrate. On the other hand, the tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor, vanadate, or the protein kinase C inhibitor, staurosporine, did not significantly modify sodium butyrate effects. Using protein phosphatase 1 and 2A for in vitro assays, we found a 45% increase of phosphatase activity after cell treatment by sodium butyrate, possibly due to a protein phosphatase 1-type protein phosphatase. These data strongly suggest that signaling pathway(s) triggered by sodium butyrate to modulate gene expression involve(s) a serine-threonine-phosphatase activity.

Varied expression patterns of human H1 histone genes in different cell lines

Five main type H1 histones have been described in man (H1.1-H1.5) in addition to the testis specific type H1t and the replacement subtype H1 degrees, which is found mainly in highly differentiated cells. We have isolated this whole complement of H1 genes and have studied the expression of the seven human H1 subtype genes in several cell lines. The RNAase protection assay was used to discriminate between the very similar transcripts derived from the seven H1 subtype genes. With the exception of H1.2 and H1.4, we found substantial differences between the H1 mRNA levels in the different cell lines tested. No H1.1 mRNA was detected in most of the cell lines and just a low level of H1.1 mRNA was found in human testis. In contrast to the differential patterns of the other subtypes, H1.2 and H1.4 were in all cells expressed at a high level, indicating a basal function compared with the other H1 histones. Because differences in the timing of H1 protein subtype synthesis have been reported, we have analyzed the kinetics of accumulation of H1 subtypes in synchronized HeLa cells and observed that all H1 subtypes examined (H1 degrees, H1.2-H1.5) were expressed in a replication-dependent manner. The analysis showed a differential rise of mRNA levels during S-phase, from four-fold (H1 degrees) to 15-fold (H1.5). Our results may point at a specific function of each subtype and suggest that expression of the H1 histone subtype genes depends on common S-phase-depent factors as well as on individual regulatory systems. Thus, the data presented here provide a basis for further analysis of the regulation and function of the complex H1 gene and protein family.

Regulation of H1(0) gene expression by nuclear receptors through an unusual response element: implications for regulation of cell proliferation

Cloning and sequence analysis of the 5'-flanking region of the human H1(0) histone gene, a differentiation-specific member of the H1 family, has revealed several potential regulatory elements. In this study, we have characterized the interactions of nuclear receptors with an unusual response element consisting of two half-sites arranged as a direct repeat with an 8-bp spacer (DR-8). Thyroid hormone receptors (TR) bind this DR-8 as homodimers and heterodimers with RXR. Retinoic acid receptors (RARs) also bind as heterodimers with RXR to the DR-8, and this binding is enhanced in the presence of retinoic acid (RA) and/or 9-cis RA. Reporter constructs containing the DR-8 allowed a several-fold induction by T3 in the presence of TRs. RAR alpha and RAR beta allowed RA-dependent transcriptional activation whereas RAR gamma mostly increased basal activity. 9-cis RA inhibited the T3 response, indicating a hormonal cross-talk among the subfamily of nuclear receptors. Two orphan receptors, COUP-TF and v-erbA, also bind the DR-8 sequence in the human H1(0) promoter. COUP-TF, which usually represses RAREs, enhances transcriptional activation through the DR-8 whereas v-erbA completely represses TR-RXR induction of the H1(0) gene. Thus, a number of signaling pathways that play important roles during development and differentiation are able to influence the transcription rate of this special H1 subtype directly through a DR-8 response element in its promoter. Because H1(0) expression levels inversely correlate with cell proliferation, our data suggest that several nuclear receptors and the v-erbA oncogene can influence cell proliferation via the regulation of H1(0) expression.

Trichostatin A and trapoxin: novel chemical probes for the role of histone acetylation in chromatin structure and function

Reversible acetylation at the epsilon-amino group of lysines located at the conserved domain of core histones is supposed to play an important role in the regulation of chromatin structure and its transcriptional activity. One promising strategy for analyzing the precise function of histone acetylation is to block the activities of acetylating or deacetylating enzymes by specific inhibitors. Recently, two microbial metabolites, trichostatin A and trapoxin, were found to be potent inhibitors of histone deacetylases. Trichostatin A reversibly inhibits the mammalian histone deacetylase, whereas trapoxin causes inhibition through irreversible binding to the enzyme. The histone deacetylase from a trichostatin A-resistant cell line is resistant to trichostatin A, indicating that the enzyme is the primary target. Both of the agents induce a variety of biological responses of cells such as induction of differentiation and cell cycle arrest. Trichostatin A and trapoxin are useful in analyzing the role of histone acetylation in chromatin structure and function as well as in determining the genes whose activities are regulated by histone acetylation.

Developmentally regulated expression of linker-histone variants in vertebrates

The identification of histone H1 variants in vertebrates suggests that these proteins may have specialized functions. During embryonic development, a correspondence between the expression of each of the linker-histone variants and the proliferative and transcriptional activity of embryonic cells can be observed. Analysis of the developmentally regulated expression of these variants leads to the subdivision of these variants into distinct classes. This subdivision may also provide insight into the significance of the differential expression of variants and the roles individual linker histones have in chromatin structure and function.

Relationship between core histone acetylation and histone H1(0) gene activity

In this study we show a striking correlation between histone H1(0) gene expression and histone acetylation. Trichostatin A, a highly specific inhibitor of histone deacetylase, efficiently induces H1(0) gene expression. Moreover, using a cell line sensitive to trichostatin A (FM3A) and a derived cell line selected for its resistance to this inhibitor (TR303), it is shown that the level of H1(0) gene expression is related to the extent of chromatin acetylation. After showing the S-phase-dependent activation of H1(0) gene expression, we demonstrate that hyperacetylation has a dominant effect on H1(0) gene expression, since it enhances the expression of the gene independent of the position of cells in the cell cycle. This response to deacetylase inhibitors is specific to H1(0), since it is not shared by other cell-cycle-dependent histone genes (H1 and H4). Finally, by transfection of trichostatin-A-resistant and trichostatin-A-sensitive cells with a plasmid containing a H1(0) promoter, we show that the exogenous H1(0) promoter is also highly sensitive to trichostatin A treatment and that activation of transcription follows exactly the same pattern as activation of the endogenous gene. These data show that histone acetylation may be used to modulate H1(0) gene activity and offers insight into a possible mechanism in which the developmentally regulated chromatin acetylation acts to potentiate H1(0) gene expression.

Molecular basis of the activation of basal histone H1(0) gene expression

Histone H1(0) is encoded by a gene that is expressed only in cells committed to differentiation. We have previously cloned the Xenopus laevis H1(0) gene and studied elements involved in the regulation of its expression in transfected Xenopus laevis A6 cells, and in microinjected embryos. In this work, in order to understand the basis of the action of these elements, we used an A6 cell nuclear extract and showed that the H1(0) promoter is able to direct efficient in vitro transcription, which is highly dependent on a functional TATA box. However, in contrast to what we observed in vivo, in transfected A6 cells, the in vitro transcription was independent of major regulatory elements, defined in vivo. We then used this in vitro system to reconstitute H1(0) gene regulation. The creation of a repressive environment by the addition of purified histone H1 to the in vitro transcription system allowed us to obtain transcription dependent on the integrity of the regulatory elements. Investigating the basis of this regulation we found that protein-DNA interaction on the proximal promoter region was dependent on the integrity of proximal elements, and moreover the distal regulatory element, the UCE, was able to modulate this interaction. We conclude that the role of these regulatory elements is to maintain the basal TATA-dependent transcription of H1(0) under repressive condition: i.e., H1-mediated repression of transcription, or chromatin assembly in general.

Transcriptional activation of histone H1 zero during neuronal terminal differentiation

We have examined the central nervous system (CNS) of developing and adult transgenic mice carrying sequences upstream of the histone H1 zero gene fused to the E. coli beta-galactosidase gene (lac Z). The transgene is induced in a subset of the neuronal population during postnatal development, coinciding with neuronal terminal differentiation. At postnatal day 9, the earliest time at which the transgene product can be detected, positive neurons are observed in the granular layer of the cerebellar cortex and in the pyramidal fields of the hippocampus. The transgene is then induced in other areas of the CNS, such as the neocortex, thalamus, hypothalamus, olfactory bulb, globus pallidus superior and inferior colliculus, substantia nigra, pontine nuclei and brain stem. Induction is unrelated with determination and quiescence, which are essentially prenatal. The overlapping of the temporal and regional patterns of transgene activity with those of the endogenous protein shows that the accumulation of H1 zero in differentiating neurons is at least in part under transcriptional control. In the light of these results, the H1 zero gene appears as the only mammalian histone gene that specifically responds to terminal differentiation. However, not all terminally differentiated neurons express H1 zero at detectable levels. For instance, Purkinje cells are negative. In neurons, terminal differentiation appears thus as a necessary, but not a sufficient condition for increased H1 zero expression.

Two mRNA species encoding the differentiation-associated histone H1(0) are produced by alternative polyadenylation in mouse

Histone H1(0) is a differentiation-specific member of the histone H1 family. The accumulation of the protein is associated with the terminal stage of cell differentiation and is regulated at various levels. In mouse, the analysis of the expression of the single copy gene encoding H1(0) has shown that another H1(0)-related mRNA species (0.9 kb) is present in addition to the usual 2.1-kb mRNA. In this study, we have cloned and sequenced the smaller H1(0)-related mRNA. This mRNA seems to be produced by the use of an additional polyadenylation signal present in the 3' untranslated region (UTR) of the initial transcript. This smaller H1(0)-encoding mRNA is expressed only in mouse and is transferred into polysomes as efficiently as the larger version upon the induction of cell differentiation. The use of the described polyadenylation site removes over 1 kb of the 3' UTR of H1(0) mRNA and seems to be involved in the regulation of H1(0) mRNA stability.

Organization and expression of H1 histone and H1 replacement histone genes

The H1 family is the most divergent subgroup of the highly conserved class of histone proteins [Cole: Int J Pept Protein Res 30:433-449, 1987]. In several vertebrate species, the H1 complement comprises five or more subtypes, and tissue specific patterns of H1 histones have been described. The diversity of the H1 histone family raises questions about the functions of different H1 subtypes and about the differential control of expression of their genes. The expression of main type H1 genes is coordinated with DNA replication, whereas the regulation of synthesis of replacement H1 subtypes, such as H1 zero and H5, and the testis specific H1t appears to be more complex. The differential control of H1 gene expression is reflected in the chromosomal organization of the genes and in different promoter structures. This review concentrates on a comparison of the chromosomal organization of main type and replacement H1 histone genes and on the differential regulation of their expression. General structural and functional data, which apply to both H1 and core histone genes and which are covered by recent reviews, will not be discussed in detail.

Differential regulation of the human H1 zero-histone-gene transcription in human tumor-cell lines

Cloning and sequence analysis of about 2 kb of the 5' flanking region of the human H1 zero histone gene reveals several potential regulatory elements upstream of the transcribed portion of this gene. Transfection studies using the chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) gene as a reporter gene with a series of promoter deletions revealed that the expression of the H1 zero gene may depend on a complex interplay of several transcription factors, including members of the retinoic acid and/or thyroid-hormone-receptor superfamily, at the 5' flanking region of the H1 zero gene. CAT assays demonstrate varied patterns of expression and regulation in different human tumor-cell lines. The leukemia cell line HL60 does not express H1 zero mRNA and shows no CAT activity. HeLa cells strongly express the CAT gene under the control of the H1 zero promoter. Under the same conditions, HepG2 cells also transcribe the CAT gene, although at a lower rate than HeLa cells. Using different promoter-deletion clones, the CAT activity differs in HepG2 and HeLa cells in the very distal promoter region. In both cell lines, the CAT activity decreases several fold when the region between nucleotides -450 and -600 upstream of the mRNA start site is deleted. It also decreases when just the proximal portion but not the distal promoter region is deleted. In summary, the regulatory patterns of these three cell lines differ, indicating a cell-type-specific regulation of the human H1 zero-histone-gene expression.

Association of a human H1 histone gene with an H2A pseudogene and genes encoding H2B.1 and H3.1 histones

A cluster of human histone genes was found on three overlapping clones isolated from cosmid and bacteriophage libraries. These three overlapping segments of the human genome comprise genes coding for H3.1, an H2A pseudogene, and an H2B.1 gene downstream of the previously characterized H1.2 gene. The cosmid clone covers 30 kb upstream of the H1.2 gene and overlaps with two phage clones covering the core histone genes and the pseudogene. The same arrangement of an H3 gene, an H2A pseudogene and an H2B gene downstream of an H1 gene has been described within a mouse histone gene cluster [Yang et al.:J Biol Chem 262:17118-17125, 1987; Gruber et al.:Gene 95:303-304, 1990].

Developmental regulation and butyrate-inducible transcription of the Xenopus histone H1(0) promoter

We have isolated genomic clones of the Xenopus laevis histone H1(0) promoter and identified regulatory elements mediating the transcriptional regulation of the H1(0) gene. Expression of H1(0) is associated with the terminal differentiation of many cell types. During X. laevis development, H1(0) mRNA is present in the oocyte and egg, but remains at low levels during embryogenesis until hatching. After this time, mRNA levels accumulate dramatically correlating with the differentiation of many tissue types, e.g., liver and skin. Accumulation of H1(0) mRNA can be induced at earlier development stages by treating embryos with butyrate. The enhanced transcription of H1(0) in adult somatic cells, as well as the butyrate inducibility of the gene, have been investigated using transfection of adult X. laevis A6 somatic cells. We have defined specific protein-nucleic acid interactions with three cis-acting elements. Two previously defined gene regulatory elements: the H1 box, normally involved in the regulation of the H1 gene, and the H4TF2 site, normally involved in the regulation of the H4 gene, appear to have novel roles in determining differentiation-specific H1(0) expression. These two elements act together with a new distal cis-acting element in order to sustain high levels of basal transcription and to potentiate transcription following butyrate treatment.

Brain non-adenylated mRNAs

Most eukaryotic messenger RNA (mRNA) species contain a 3'-poly(A) tract. The histone mRNAs are a notable exception although a subclass of histone-encoding mRNAs is polyadenylated. A class of mRNAs lacking a poly(A) tail would be expected to be less stable than poly(A)+ mRNAs and might, like the histones, have a half-life that varied in response to changes in the intracellular milieu. Brain mRNA exhibits an unusually high degree of sequence complexity; studies published ten years ago suggested that a large component of this complexity might be present in a poly(A)- mRNA population that was expressed postnatally. The question of the existence of a complex class of poly(A)- brain mRNAs is particularly tantalizing in light of the heterogeneity of brain cells and the possibility that the stability of these poly(A)- mRNAs might vary with changes in synaptic function, changing hormonal stimulation or with other modulations of neuronal function. The mRNA complexity analyses, although intriguing, did not prove the existence of the complex class of poly(A)- brain mRNAs. The observed mRNA complexity could have resulted from a variety of artifacts, discussed in more detail below. Several attempts have been made to clone members of this class of mRNA. This search for specific poly(A)- brain mRNAs has met with only limited success. Changes in mRNA polyadenylation state do occur in brain in response to specific physiologic stimuli; however, both the role of polyadenylation and de-adenylation in specific neuronal activities and the existence and significance of poly(A)- mRNAs in brain remain unclear.

Differential expression of the histone H1 zero gene in U937 and HL-60 leukemia cell lines

The expression of the human H1 zero histone gene and of a main type H1 gene was analyzed in two human leukemia cell lines. The main type, replication dependent H1 gene expression reflected the state of proliferation of both cell lines. No H1 zero mRNA was detected in the promyelocytic HL-60 line, whereas the monocytic U937 cells showed low steady-state levels of 1H zero mRNA. Stimulation of HL-60 with several known inducers of differentiation failed to induce any accumulation of H1 zero mRNA. Treatment of U937 with phorbol ester or butyrate, on the other hand, led to an increase of the H1 zero mRNA concentration.

Induction of H1(0)-gene expression in B16 murine melanoma cells

Histone H1(0) accumulation is associated with the terminal stage of differentiation. Unlike other H1 histones, it is able to accumulate in the absence of DNA synthesis, however the transcription of its gene is cell-cycle dependent. The regulation of H1(0)-gene expression has been studied during the induced differentiation of B16 cells and during reversion of the process, which may be achieved when induced cells are released into an inducing-agent-free medium. During the earlier period of induced differentiation, H1(0) mRNA showed over-expression when the cells were still proliferating. Then the amount of H1(0) mRNA decreased as the cells became arrested in G0-G1. H1(0) mRNA half-life measurements and run-on experiments demonstrated that such modulation of the amount of mRNA originated from a transcriptional control of H1(0)-gene expression. When induced cells reverted to a proliferative undifferentiated state, H1(0) mRNA decreased very rapidly, indicating that an active process was involved in this decay. This behavior differed from that observed in rat liver hepatocytes allowed to proliferate and de-differentiate after partial hepatectomy, or in murine erythroleukemia cells when the inducing agent was removed from the culture.

Structure and expression of the human gene encoding testicular H1 histone (H1t)

The gene coding for the human H1t histone, a testis-specific H1 subtype, was isolated from a genomic library using a human somatic H1 gene as a hybridization probe. The corresponding mRNA is not polyadenylated and encodes a 206-amino-acid protein. Sequence analysis and S1 nuclease mapping of the human H1t gene reveals that the 5' flanking region contains several consensus promoter elements, as described for somatic, i.e., S-phase-dependent H1 subtype genes. The 3' region includes the stem-and-loop structure necessary for mRNA processing of most histone mRNAs. Northern blot analysis with RNAs from different human tissues and cell lines revealed that only testicular RNA hybridized with this gene probe.

Regulation of histone H5 and H1 zero gene expression under the control of vaccinia virus-specific sequences in interferon-treated chick embryo fibroblasts

The duck histone H5 and human H1 zero were inserted into the thymidine kinase (TK) gene of vaccinia virus and the interferon sensitivity of their expression under the control of the viral TK and P7.5 promoters in chick embryo fibroblasts (CEF) was compared to the interferon sensitivity of vaccinia virus WR specific TK induction. Expression and transport of these histones to the nucleus in CEF infected with the appropriate vaccinia virus recombinants could be detected with antisera raised against chick histone H5. In CEF cultivated for 3 days, interferon treatment that completely inhibited TK synthesis had no or only a marginal inhibitory effect on the expression of the histone genes. Inhibition of the expression of the histones could be detected under conditions of increased interferon sensitivity in aged CEF. The magnitude of inhibition was, however, less pronounced than the inhibition of viral TK synthesis. These data indicate that flanking vaccinia virus DNA regions confer interferon sensitivity to the expression of these histone genes, but that they contain structural information that partially exempts their expression from the inhibitory activity of the interferon-induced regulatory system.

Effects of antineoplastic phospholipids on parameters of cell differentiation in U937 cells

The proliferation of the human promonocytic leukemia cell line U937 is inhibited by several ether lipids, ether lipid analogues and by phorbol esters. An early effect of this retardation of cell growth is the induction of a basic chromosomal protein, histone H1(0). Northern blot analysis of H1(0) mRNA levels reveals an increase of the mRNA concentration within a few hours after addition of hexadecylphosphocholine and 1-O-octadecyl-2-O-methyl-rac-glycero-3-phosphocholine. This early effect on the synthesis of a subtype of H1 proteins precedes the expression of several parameters of the monocytic differentiation of U937 cells.

The expression of the histone H1 (0) gene in the human hepatoma cell line HepG2 is independent of the state of cell proliferation

The H1 histone subtype H1 (0) is a characteristic component of the chromatin of several mammalian tissues. Since H1 (0) is synthesized in nondividing cells upon terminal differentiation, it has been mostly considered either as a prerequisite for or as a consequence of an arrest of DNA replication during the process of differentiation. In several H1 (0)-expressing systems studied until now, inducers of differentiation or inhibitors of DNA synthesis cause an increase of the ratio between H1 (0) and the other H1 proteins. We have studied the steady-state levels of histone H1 (0) mRNA under varied growth conditions in the human hepatoma cell lines HepG2 and Hep3B, and we show in the HepG2 system that H1 (0) is not confined to resting cells, that the H1 (0) gene appears to be expressed throughout the cell cycle and that established inducers of de novo H1 (0) synthesis fail to cause a further increase of the high H1 (0) level. This constitutive expression of H1 (0) appears to reflect the chromatin structure of the liver cells, from which the HepG2 hepatoblastoma cells initially may have evolved. In contrast to the situation in nondividing adult liver cells, the H1 (0) gene is transcribed in HepG2 at a high level, and this expression is compatible with DNA replication.

Increased level of histone H1(0) messenger RNA in hypoxic Ehrlich ascites tumor cells

We have investigated the expression of the H1 histone subtype H1(0) gene in Ehrlich ascites tumor cells (EAT) under varied conditions of oxygen supply. Our results show that proliferating EAT cells express H1(0) mRNA at a basal level under normoxic conditions. Severe hypoxia leads to a cessation of cell growth and causes an accumulation of cells in G1. Here, we show that the level of H1(0) histone mRNA increases within a few hours after the onset of hypoxia.

Cloning and characterization of the mouse histone H1(0) promoter region

From a mouse genomic DNA library we have isolated sequences containing the entire coding region for histone H1(0) mRNA, flanked by several kb at both the 3' and 5' ends. Deletions of the 5' upstream region ligated to the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT)-encoding gene as a reporter, have shown that a region from bp -400 to -600 is necessary and sufficient for efficient transcription. We have also shown that treatment of F9 teratocarcinoma cells with retinoic acid and cyclic AMP (which differentiates F9 cells to parietal endoderm) clearly increases CAT activity several times over the level found in untreated F9 cells. This increase was observed in transient, as well as in stably transfected cells. Analysis of the deletions in differentiating cells indicates that the element responsible for the observed increase in CAT activity, is contained within the first 700 bp upstream from the H1(0) mRNA cap site.

Different 3'-end processing produces two independently regulated mRNAs from a single H1 histone gene

We describe the isolation of a mouse H1 histone gene that encodes two mRNA transcripts. One mRNA ends just beyond the coding region, near a highly conserved palindrome sequence typical of cell cycle-regulated histone genes. The level of this transcript is coupled to DNA replication. The second mRNA ends nearly 1 kilobase downstream near a polyadenylation signal. This mRNA is polyadenylylated, and its accumulation is not coupled to DNA replication. The two mRNAs are regulated independently and in some circumstances in opposite directions under several physiological conditions. The production of a polyadenylylated mRNA from an otherwise cell cycle-regulated histone gene may allow for continued synthesis of the histone protein when DNA synthesis ceases in nondividing cells.

Isolation and expression of cDNA clones coding for two sequence variants of Xenopus laevis histone H5

We have cloned and characterized cDNAs coding for two variants of Xenopus laevis H5 histone protein (previously called H1s). cDNA was synthesized from RNA of immature erythrocytes in a single reaction using a modification of the method of Gubler and Hoffman [Gene 25 (1983) 263-269], and blunt-end ligated into the HincII site of the phage vector M13mp9. Immunological screening with a polyclonal antibody yielded two clones expressing H5 peptide. Sequence characterization revealed that both clones contained partial cDNA inserts and that the smaller 340-bp clone initiated reverse transcription within the coding region, at a site rich in adenine. Rescreening of the cDNA bank by nucleic acid hybridization produced eleven additional H5 clones, one of which coded for a second variant of H5. These two variants, called XLH5A and XLH5B, are very similar in sequence and code for proteins of 195 and 193 amino acids, respectively, which may be the H1D and H1E variants observed previously. XLH5, avian H5 and human H1O share identity at both nucleotide and amino-acid sequence levels. Further, the XLH5-coding mRNA is likely polyadenylated and lacks the highly conserved, 23-nucleotide dyad symmetry element found within the 3' untranslated regions of most histone-coding mRNAs.

Treatment with sodium butyrate inhibits the complete condensation of interphase chromatin

The effects of histone hyperacetylation on chromatin fiber structure were studied using direct observations with the electron microscope. Histone hyperacetylation was induced in HeLa cells by treatment with sodium butyrate, and the ultrastructure of control and of acetylated chromatin fibers examined after fixation at different stages of compaction. No differences between control and acetylated chromatin were seen when the fibers were partially unfolded (10 mM NaCl, 20 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaCl), but in 100 mM NaCl, control chromatin showed further compaction to the "30 nm" fiber, while hyperacetylated chromatin failed to undergo this final compaction step. These results strongly suggest that histone acetylation causes a moderate "relaxation" rather than complete decondensation of interphase chromatin fibers. The relationship of these findings to the increased DNase I sensitivity of acetylated chromatin, and to transcription and replication, is discussed.

The H1 and core histone subtypes: differential gene expression and varied primary structures

The patterns of chromosomal proteins reflect in many cases the functional state of the respective cell type. The H1 histone group is particularly important in this respect, since these histones are involved in the higher order chromatin organization above the level of chains of nucleosomes. In mammals, the H1 histone family comprises at least five main subtypes (H1a-H1e), a testicular variant (H1t) and, thirdly, a subtype H1(0), which is found only in terminally differentiated cells. The H1(0) variant is structurally related to the avian red blood cell specific histone H5, which was the basis for our recent isolation of the human H1(0) gene. Changes of H1 histone patterns may be crucial events in modulating local chromatin arrangements, since the formation of higher order chromatin structures depends on a cooperative interaction of the H1 histones. Variations in their patterns can be studied in vivo during several developmental processes (such as spermatogenesis, erythropoiesis, maturation of several cell types) or in vitro in several tumor cell lines upon treatment with several inducers or upon inhibition of cell division. The differential regulation of the individual H1 subtypes is reflected in the gene and mRNA structures coding for the respective proteins. The cell cycle regulated histones are mostly encoded by non-polyadenylated mRNAs, whereas H5 as well as H1(0) mRNA shows a poly(A) tail at its 3' end. In conclusion, gene activity may not only be controlled at the level of RNA polymerases and their regulatory transcription factors. The varied patterns of chromosomal proteins at different stages during development and differentiation suggest that the local or overall organization of chromatin plays an additional role in these regulatory programs. Hence, the analysis of variations in patterns of chromosomal proteins is an integral part of the investigation of gene regulation mechanisms.