A TBP-containing multiprotein complex (TIF-IB) mediates transcription specificity of murine RNA polymerase I

DNA origami-based single-molecule force spectroscopy elucidates RNA Polymerase III pre-initiation complex stability

The TATA-binding protein (TBP) and a transcription factor (TF) IIB-like factor are important constituents of all eukaryotic initiation complexes. The reason for the emergence and strict requirement of the additional initiation factor Bdp1 in the RNA polymerase (RNAP) III system, however, remained elusive. A poorly studied aspect in this context is the effect of DNA strain arising from DNA compaction and transcriptional activity on initiation complex formation. We made use of a DNA origami-based force clamp to follow the assembly of human initiation complexes in the RNAP II and RNAP III systems at the single-molecule level under piconewton forces. We demonstrate that TBP-DNA complexes are force-sensitive and TFIIB is sufficient to stabilise TBP on a strained promoter. In contrast, Bdp1 is the pivotal component that ensures stable anchoring of initiation factors, and thus the polymerase itself, in the RNAP III system. Thereby, we offer an explanation for the crucial role of Bdp1 for the high transcriptional output of RNAP III.

Promoter Recognition: Putting TFIID on the Spot

Basal transcription factor TFIID connects transcription activation to the assembly of the RNA polymerase II preinitiation complex at the core promoter of genes. The mechanistic understanding of TFIID function and dynamics has been limited by the lack of high-resolution structures of the holo-TFIID complex. Recent cryo-electron microscopy studies of yeast and human TFIID complexes provide insight into the molecular organization and structural dynamics of this highly conserved transcription factor. Here, we discuss how these TFIID structures provide new paradigms for: (i) the dynamic recruitment of TFIID; (ii) the binding of TATA-binding protein (TBP) to promoter DNA; (iii) the multivalency of TFIID interactions with (co)activators, nucleosomes, or promoter DNA; and (iv) the opportunities for regulation of TBP turnover and promoter dynamics.

Transcription initiation factor TBP: old friend new questions

In all domains of life, the regulation of transcription by DNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RNAPs) is achieved at the level of initiation to a large extent. Whereas bacterial promoters are recognized by a σ-factor bound to the RNAP, a complex set of transcription factors that recognize specific promoter elements is employed by archaeal and eukaryotic RNAPs. These initiation factors are of particular interest since the regulation of transcription critically relies on initiation rates and thus formation of pre-initiation complexes. The most conserved initiation factor is the TATA-binding protein (TBP), which is of crucial importance for all archaeal-eukaryotic transcription initiation complexes and the only factor required to achieve full rates of initiation in all three eukaryotic and the archaeal transcription systems. Recent structural, biochemical and genome-wide mapping data that focused on the archaeal and specialized RNAP I and III transcription system showed that the involvement and functional importance of TBP is divergent from the canonical role TBP plays in RNAP II transcription. Here, we review the role of TBP in the different transcription systems including a TBP-centric discussion of archaeal and eukaryotic initiation complexes. We furthermore highlight questions concerning the function of TBP that arise from these findings.

RNA Polymerase II-Dependent Transcription Initiated by Selectivity Factor 1: A Central Mechanism Used by MLL Fusion Proteins in Leukemic Transformation

Cancer cells transcribe RNAs in a characteristic manner in order to maintain their oncogenic potentials. In eukaryotes, RNA is polymerized by three distinct RNA polymerases, RNA polymerase I, II, and III (RNAP1, RNAP2, and RNAP3, respectively). The transcriptional machinery that initiates each transcription reaction has been purified and characterized. Selectivity factor 1 (SL1) is the complex responsible for RNAP1 pre-initiation complex formation. However, whether it plays any role in RNAP2-dependent transcription remains unclear. Our group previously found that SL1 specifically associates with AF4 family proteins. AF4 family proteins form the AEP complex with ENL family proteins and the P-TEFb elongation factor. Similar complexes have been independently characterized by several different laboratories and are often referred to as super elongation complex. The involvement of AEP in RNAP2-dependent transcription indicates that SL1 must play an important role in RNAP2-dependent transcription. To date, this role of SL1 has not been appreciated. In leukemia, AF4 and ENL family genes are frequently rearranged to form chimeric fusion genes with MLL. The resultant MLL fusion genes produce chimeric MLL fusion proteins comprising MLL and AEP components. The MLL portion functions as a targeting module, which specifically binds chromatin containing di-/tri-methylated histone H3 lysine 36 and non-methylated CpGs. This type of chromatin is enriched at the promoters of transcriptionally active genes which allows MLL fusion proteins to selectively bind to transcriptionally-active/CpG-rich gene promoters. The fusion partner portion, which recruits other AEP components and SL1, is responsible for activation of RNAP2-dependent transcription. Consequently, MLL fusion proteins constitutively activate the transcription of previously-transcribed MLL target genes. Structure/function analysis has shown that the ability of MLL fusion proteins to transform hematopoietic progenitors depends on the recruitment of AEP and SL1. Thus, the AEP/SL1-mediated gene activation pathway appears to be the central mechanism of MLL fusion-mediated transcriptional activation. However, the molecular mechanism by which SL1 activates RNAP2-dependent transcription remains largely unclear. This review aims to cover recent discoveries of the mechanism of transcriptional activation by MLL fusion proteins and to introduce novel roles of SL1 in RNAP2-dependent transcription by discussing how the RNAP1 machinery may be involved in RNAP2-dependent gene regulation.

Transcriptional activation by MLL fusion proteins in leukemogenesis

Chromosomal translocations involving the mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) gene cause aggressive leukemia. Fusion proteins of MLL and a component of the AF4 family/ENL family/P-TEFb complex (AEP) are responsible for two-thirds of MLL-associated leukemia cases. MLL-AEP fusion proteins trigger aberrant self-renewal of hematopoietic progenitors by constitutively activating self-renewal-related genes. MLL-AEP fusion proteins activate transcription initiation by loading the TATA-binding protein (TBP) to the TATA element via selectivity factor 1. Although AEP retains transcription elongation and mediator recruiting activities, the rate-limiting step activated by MLL-AEP fusion proteins appears to be the TBP-loading step. This is contrary to prevailing views, in which the recruitment of transcription elongation activities are emphasized. Here, I review recent advances towards elucidating the mechanisms underlying gene activation by MLL-AEP fusion proteins in leukemogenesis.

TBP loading by AF4 through SL1 is the major rate-limiting step in MLL fusion-dependent transcription

Gene rearrangement of the mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) gene causes leukemia by inducing the constitutive expression of a gene subset normally expressed only in the immature haematopoietic progenitor cells. MLL gene rearrangements often generate fusion products of MLL and a component of the AF4 family/ENL family/P-TEFb (AEP) complex. MLL-AEP fusion proteins have the potential of constitutively recruiting the P-TEFb elongation complex. Thus, it is hypothesized that relieving the promoter proximal pausing of RNA polymerase II is the rate-limiting step of MLL fusion-dependent transcription. AEP also has the potential to recruit the mediator complex via MED26. We recently showed that AEP activates transcription initiation by facilitating TBP loading to the TATA element through the SL1 complex. In the present study, we show that the key activity responsible for the oncogenic property of MLL-AEP fusion proteins is the TBP loading activity, and not the mediator recruitment or transcriptional elongation activities. Thus, we propose that TBP loading by AF4 through SL1 is the major rate-limiting step in MLL fusion-dependent transcription.

AF4 uses the SL1 components of RNAP1 machinery to initiate MLL fusion- and AEP-dependent transcription

Gene rearrangements generate MLL fusion genes, which can lead to aggressive leukemia. In most cases, MLL fuses with a gene encoding a component of the AEP (AF4 family/ENL family/P-TEFb) coactivator complex. MLL-AEP fusion proteins constitutively activate their target genes to immortalize haematopoietic progenitors. Here we show that AEP and MLL-AEP fusion proteins activate transcription through selectivity factor 1 (SL1), a core component of the pre-initiation complex (PIC) of RNA polymerase I (RNAP1). The pSER domain of AF4 family proteins associates with SL1 on chromatin and loads TATA-binding protein (TBP) onto the promoter to initiate RNA polymerase II (RNAP2)-dependent transcription. These results reveal a previously unknown transcription initiation mechanism involving AEP and a role for SL1 as a TBP-loading factor in RNAP2-dependent gene activation.

Basic mechanisms in RNA polymerase I transcription of the ribosomal RNA genes

RNA Polymerase (Pol) I produces ribosomal (r)RNA, an essential component of the cellular protein synthetic machinery that drives cell growth, underlying many fundamental cellular processes. Extensive research into the mechanisms governing transcription by Pol I has revealed an intricate set of control mechanisms impinging upon rRNA production. Pol I-specific transcription factors guide Pol I to the rDNA promoter and contribute to multiple rounds of transcription initiation, promoter escape, elongation and termination. In addition, many accessory factors are now known to assist at each stage of this transcription cycle, some of which allow the integration of transcriptional activity with metabolic demands. The organisation and accessibility of rDNA chromatin also impinge upon Pol I output, and complex mechanisms ensure the appropriate maintenance of the epigenetic state of the nucleolar genome and its effective transcription by Pol I. The following review presents our current understanding of the components of the Pol I transcription machinery, their functions and regulation by associated factors, and the mechanisms operating to ensure the proper transcription of rDNA chromatin. The importance of such stringent control is demonstrated by the fact that deregulated Pol I transcription is a feature of cancer and other disorders characterised by abnormal translational capacity.

Regulation of ribosomal RNA production by RNA polymerase I: does elongation come first?

Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) production represents the most active transcription in the cell. Synthesis of the large rRNA precursors (35-47S) can be achieved by up to 150 RNA polymerase I (Pol I) enzymes simultaneously transcribing each rRNA gene. In this paper, we present recent advances made in understanding the regulatory mechanisms that control elongation. Built-in Pol I elongation factors, such as Rpa34/Rpa49 in budding yeast and PAF53/CAST in humans, are instrumental to the extremely high rate of rRNA production per gene. rRNA elongation mechanisms are intrinsically linked to chromatin structure and to the higher-order organization of the rRNA genes (rDNA). Factors such as Hmo1 in yeast and UBF1 in humans are key players in rDNA chromatin structure in vivo. Finally, elongation factors known to regulate messengers RNA production by RNA polymerase II are also involved in rRNA production and work cooperatively with Rpa49 in vivo.

AMPK and mTOR in cellular energy homeostasis and drug targets

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a central controller of cell growth and proliferation. mTOR forms two distinct complexes, mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2). mTORC1 is regulated by multiple signals such as growth factors, amino acids, and cellular energy and regulates numerous essential cellular processes including translation, transcription, and autophagy. The AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a cellular energy sensor and signal transducer that is regulated by a wide array of metabolic stresses. These two pathways serve as a signaling nexus for regulating cellular metabolism, energy homeostasis, and cell growth, and dysregulation of each pathway may contribute to the development of metabolic disorders such as obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cancer. This review focuses on our current understanding of the relationship between AMPK and mTORC1 signaling and discusses their roles in cellular and organismal energy homeostasis.

Journey of a Molecular Biologist

My journey into a research career began in fermentation biochemistry in an applied science department during the difficult post-World War II time in Japan. Subsequently, my desire to do research in basic science developed. I was fortunate to be a postdoctoral fellow in the United States during the early days of molecular biology. From 1957 to 1960, I worked with three pioneers of molecular biology, Sol Spiegelman, James Watson, and Seymour Benzer. These experiences helped me develop into a basic research scientist. My initial research projects at Osaka University, and subsequently at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, were on the mode of action of colicins as well as on mRNA and ribosomes. Following success in the reconstitution of ribosomal subunits, my efforts focused more on ribosomes, initially on the aspects of structure, function, and in vitro assembly, such as the construction of the 30S subunit assembly map. After this, my laboratory studied the regulation of the synthesis of ribosomes and ribosomal components in Escherichia coli. Our achievements included the discovery of translational feedback regulation of ribosomal protein synthesis and the identification of several repressor ribosomal proteins used in this regulation. In 1984, I moved to the University of California, Irvine, and initiated research on rRNA transcription by RNA polymerase I in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The use of yeast genetics combined with biochemistry allowed us to identify genes uniquely involved in rRNA synthesis and to elucidate the mechanism of initiation of transcription. This essay is a reflection on my life as a research scientist.

hALP, a novel transcriptional U three protein (t-UTP), activates RNA polymerase I transcription by binding and acetylating the upstream binding factor (UBF)

Transcription of ribosome RNA precursor (pre-rRNA) and pre-rRNA processing are coordinated by a subset of U three proteins (UTPs) known as transcriptional UTPs (t-UTPs), which participate in pre-rRNA transcription in addition to participation in 18 S rRNA processing. However, the mechanism by which t-UTPs function in pre-rRNA transcription remains undetermined. In the present study, we identified hALP, a histone acetyl-transferase as a novel t-UTP. We first showed that hALP is nucleolar, and is associated with U3 snoRNA and required for 18 S rRNA processing. Moreover, depletion of hALP resulted in a decreased level of 47 S pre-rRNA. Ectopic expression of hALP activated the rDNA promoter luciferase reporter and knockdown of hALP inhibited the reporter. In addition, hALP bound rDNA. Taken together these data identify hALP as a novel t-UTP. Immunoprecipitation and GST pulldown experiments showed that hALP binds the upstream binding factor (UBF) in vivo and in vitro. It is of importance that hALP acetylated UBF depending on HAT in vivo, and hALP but not hALP (ΔHAT) facilitated the nuclear translocation of the RNA polymerase I (Pol I)-associated factor 53 (PAF53) from the cytoplasm and promoted the association of UBF with PAF53. Thus, we provide a mechanism in which a novel t-UTP activates Pol I transcription by binding and acetylating UBF.

1A6/DRIM, a novel t-UTP, activates RNA polymerase I transcription and promotes cell proliferation

BACKGROUND

Ribosome biogenesis is required for protein synthesis and cell proliferation. Ribosome subunits are assembled in the nucleolus following transcription of a 47S ribosome RNA precursor by RNA polymerase I and rRNA processing to produce mature 18S, 28S and 5.8S rRNAs. The 18S rRNA is incorporated into the ribosomal small subunit, whereas the 28S and 5.8S rRNAs are incorporated into the ribosomal large subunit. Pol I transcription and rRNA processing are coordinated processes and this coordination has been demonstrated to be mediated by a subset of U3 proteins known as t-UTPs. Up to date, five t-UTPs have been identified in humans but the mechanism(s) that function in the t-UTP(s) activation of Pol I remain unknown. In this study we have identified 1A6/DRIM, which was identified as UTP20 in our previous study, as a t-UTP. In the present study, we investigated the function and mechanism of 1A6/DRIM in Pol I transcription.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Knockdown of 1A6/DRIM by siRNA resulted in a decreased 47S pre-rRNA level as determined by Northern blotting. Ectopic expression of 1A6/DRIM activated and knockdown of 1A6/DRIM inhibited the human rDNA promoter as evaluated with luciferase reporter. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments showed that 1A6/DRIM bound UBF and the rDNA promoter. Re-ChIP assay showed that 1A6/DRIM interacts with UBF at the rDNA promoter. Immunoprecipitation confirmed the interaction between 1A6/DRIM and the nucleolar acetyl-transferase hALP. It is of note that knockdown of 1A6/DRIM dramatically inhibited UBF acetylation. A finding of significance was that 1A6/DRIM depletion, as a kind of nucleolar stress, caused an increase in p53 level and inhibited cell proliferation by arresting cells at G1.

CONCLUSIONS

We identify 1A6/DRIM as a novel t-UTP. Our results suggest that 1A6/DRIM activates Pol I transcription most likely by associating with both hALP and UBF and thereby affecting the acetylation of UBF.

NER factors are recruited to active promoters and facilitate chromatin modification for transcription in the absence of exogenous genotoxic attack

Upon gene activation, we found that RNA polymerase II transcription machinery assembles sequentially with the nucleotide excision repair (NER) factors at the promoter. This recruitment occurs in absence of exogenous genotoxic attack, is sensitive to transcription inhibitors, and depends on the XPC protein. The presence of these repair proteins at the promoter of activated genes is necessary in order to achieve optimal DNA demethylation and histone posttranslational modifications (H3K4/H3K9 methylation, H3K9/14 acetylation) and thus efficient RNA synthesis. Deficiencies in some NER factors impede the recruitment of others and affect nuclear receptor transactivation. Our data suggest that there is a functional difference between the presence of the NER factors at the promoters (which requires XPC) and the NER factors at the distal regions of the gene (which requires CSB). While the latter may be a repair function, the former is a function with respect to transcription unveiled in the current study.

Circadian gene expression is resilient to large fluctuations in overall transcription rates

Mammalian circadian oscillators are considered to rely on transcription/translation feedback loops in clock gene expression. The major and essential loop involves the autorepression of cryptochrome (Cry1, Cry2) and period (Per1, Per2) genes. The rhythm-generating circuitry is functional in most cell types, including cultured fibroblasts. Using this system, we show that significant reduction in RNA polymerase II-dependent transcription did not abolish circadian oscillations, but surprisingly accelerated them. A similar period shortening was observed at reduced incubation temperatures in wild-type mouse fibroblasts, but not in cells lacking Per1. Our data suggest that mammalian circadian oscillators are resilient to large fluctuations in general transcription rates and temperature, and that PER1 has an important function in transcription and temperature compensation.

Epigenetic regulation of TTF-I-mediated promoter-terminator interactions of rRNA genes

Ribosomal RNA synthesis is the eukaryotic cell's main transcriptional activity, but little is known about the chromatin domain organization and epigenetics of actively transcribed rRNA genes. Here, we show epigenetic and spatial organization of mouse rRNA genes at the molecular level. TTF-I-binding sites subdivide the rRNA transcription unit into functional chromatin domains and sharply delimit transcription factor occupancy. H2A.Z-containing nucleosomes occupy the spacer promoter next to a newly characterized TTF-I-binding site. The spacer and the promoter proximal TTF-I-binding sites demarcate the enhancer. DNA from both the enhancer and the coding region is hypomethylated in actively transcribed repeats. 3C analysis revealed an interaction between promoter and terminator regions, which brings the beginning and end of active rRNA genes into close contact. Reporter assays show that TTF-I mediates this interaction, thereby linking topology and epigenetic regulation of the rRNA genes.

CK2-mediated stimulation of Pol I transcription by stabilization of UBF-SL1 interaction

High levels of rRNA synthesis by RNA polymerase I are important for cell growth and proliferation. In vitro studies have indicated that the formation of a stable complex between the HMG box factor [Upstream binding factor (UBF)] and SL1 at the rRNA gene promoter is necessary to direct multiple rounds of Pol I transcription initiation. The recruitment of SL1 to the promoter occurs through protein interactions with UBF and is regulated by phosphorylation of UBF. Here we show that the protein kinase CK2 co-immunoprecipitates with the Pol I complex and is associated with the rRNA gene promoter. Inhibition of CK2 kinase activity reduces Pol I transcription in cultured cells and in vitro. Significantly, CK2 regulates the interaction between UBF and SL1 by counteracting the inhibitory effect of HMG boxes five and six through the phosphorylation of specific serines located at the C-terminus of UBF. Transcription reactions with immobilized templates indicate that phosphorylation of CK2 phosphoacceptor sites in the C-terminal domain of UBF is important for promoting multiple rounds of Pol I transcription. These data demonstrate that CK2 is recruited to the rRNA gene promoter and directly regulates Pol I transcription re-initiation by stabilizing the association between UBF and SL1.

The Treacher Collins syndrome (TCOF1) gene product is involved in ribosomal DNA gene transcription by interacting with upstream binding factor

Treacher Collins syndrome (TCS) is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by an abnormality of craniofacial development that arises during early embryogenesis. TCS is caused by mutations in the gene TCOF1, which encodes the nucleolar phosphoprotein treacle. Even though the genetic alterations causing TCS have been uncovered, the mechanism underlying its pathogenesis and the function of treacle remain unknown. Here, we show that treacle is involved in ribosomal DNA gene transcription by interacting with upstream binding factor (UBF). Immunofluorescence labeling shows treacle and UBF colocalize to specific nucleolar organizer regions and cosegregate within nucleolar caps of actinomycin d-treated HeLa cells. Biochemical analysis shows the association of treacle and UBF with chromatin. Immunoprecipitation and the yeast two-hybrid system both suggest physical interaction of the two nucleolar phosphoproteins. Down-regulation of treacle expression using specific short interfering RNA results in inhibition of ribosomal DNA transcription and cell growth. A similar correlation is observed in Tcof(+/-) mouse embryos that exhibit craniofacial defects and growth retardation. Thus, treacle haploinsufficiency in TCS patients might result in abnormal development caused by inadequate ribosomal RNA production in the prefusion neural folds during the early stages of embryogenesis. The elucidation of a physiological function of treacle provides important information of relevance to the molecular dissection of the biochemical pathology of TCS.

Multiple interactions between RNA polymerase I, TIF-IA and TAF(I) subunits regulate preinitiation complex assembly at the ribosomal gene promoter

In mammals, growth-dependent regulation of rRNA synthesis is brought about by the transcription initiation factor TIF-IA. TIF-IA is associated with a fraction of the TBP-containing factor TIF-IB/SL1 and the initiation-competent form of RNA polymerase I (Pol I). We investigated the mechanisms that down-regulate cellular pre-rRNA synthesis and demonstrate that nutrient starvation, density arrest and protein synthesis inhibitors inactivate TIF-IA and impair the association of TIF-IA with Pol I. Moreover, we used a panel of TIF-IA deletion mutants to map the domains that mediate the interaction of TIF-IA with Pol I and TIF-IB/SL1. We found that amino acids 512-609 interact with two subunits of Pol I, RPA43 and PAF67, whereas a short, conserved motif (LARAK, amino acids 411-415) is required for the association of TIF-IA with TAF(I)95 and TAF(I)68. The results uncover an interphase for essential protein-protein interactions that facilitate Pol I preinitiation complex formation.

Hmo1, an HMG-box protein, belongs to the yeast ribosomal DNA transcription system

Hmo1 is one of seven HMG-box proteins of Saccharo myces cerevisiae. Null mutants have a limited effect on growth. Hmo1 overexpression suppresses rpa49-Delta mutants lacking Rpa49, a non-essential but conserved subunit of RNA polymerase I corresponding to the animal RNA polymerase I factor PAF53. This overexpression strongly increases de novo rRNA synthesis. rpa49-Delta hmo1-Delta double mutants are lethal, and this lethality is bypassed when RNA polymerase II synthesizes rRNA. Hmo1 co-localizes with Fob1, a known rDNA-binding protein, defining a narrow territory adjacent to the nucleoplasm that could delineate the rDNA nucleolar domain. These data identify Hmo1 as a genuine RNA polymerase I factor acting synergistically with Rpa49. As an HMG-box protein, Hmo1 is remotely related to animal UBF factors. hmo1-Delta and rpa49-Delta are lethal with top3-Delta DNA topoisomerase (type I) mutants and are suppressed in mutants lacking the Sgs1 DNA helicase. They are not affected by top1-Delta defective in Top1, the other eukaryotic type I topoisomerase. Conversely, rpa34-Delta mutants lacking Rpa34, a non-essential subunit associated with Rpa49, are lethal in top1-Delta but not in top3-Delta.

TFIIH plays an essential role in RNA polymerase I transcription

TFIIH is a multisubunit protein complex that plays an essential role in nucleotide excision repair and transcription of protein-coding genes. Here, we report that TFIIH is also required for ribosomal RNA synthesis in vivo and in vitro. In yeast, pre-rRNA synthesis is impaired in TFIIH ts strains. In a mouse, part of cellular TFIIH is localized within the nucleolus and is associated with subpopulations of both RNA polymerase I and the basal factor TIF-IB. Transcription systems lacking TFIIH are inactive and exogenous TFIIH restores transcriptional activity. TFIIH is required for productive but not abortive rDNA transcription, implying a postinitiation role in transcription. The results provide a molecular link between RNA polymerase I transcription and transcription-coupled repair of active ribosomal RNA genes.

Species-specific interaction of transcription factor p70 with the rDNA core promoter

p70 is a transcription factor that is involved in the initiation of transcription by RNA polymerase I and has been shown to cooperate with the selectivity factor SL1 for binding to the core promoter region of mammalian ribosomal RNA gene (rDNA). To examine a role of the p70-SL1 interaction in promoter recognition, mouse and human proteins were partially purified and analyzed by UV-cross linking. Mouse rDNA core promoter was recognized by any combination of p70 and SL1 prepared from either species. In contrast, human p70 no longer bound to the human core promoter when mouse SL1 was used. Thus, a species-specific interaction between p70 and SL1 may be involved in the promoter selection for rDNA transcription.

The recruitment of RNA polymerase I on rDNA is mediated by the interaction of the A43 subunit with Rrn3

RNA polymerase I (Pol I) is dedicated to transcription of the large ribosomal DNA (rDNA). The mechanism of Pol I recruitment onto rDNA promoters is poorly understood. Here we present evidence that subunit A43 of Pol I interacts with transcription factor Rrn3: conditional mutations in A43 were found to disrupt the transcriptionally competent Pol I-Rrn3 complex, the two proteins formed a stable complex when co-expressed in Escherichia coli, overexpression of Rrn3 suppressed the mutant phenotype, and A43 and Rrn3 mutants showed synthetic lethality. Consistently, immunoelectron microscopy data showed that A43 and Rrn3 co-localize within the Pol I-Rrn3 complex. Rrn3 has several protein partners: a two-hybrid screen identified the C-terminus of subunit Rrn6 of the core factor as a Rrn3 contact, an interaction supported in vitro by affinity chromatography. Our results suggest that Rrn3 plays a central role in Pol I recruitment to rDNA promoters by bridging the enzyme to the core factor. The existence of mammalian orthologues of A43 and Rrn3 suggests evolutionary conservation of the molecular mechanisms underlying rDNA transcription in eukaryotes.

RNA polymerase I transcription factor Rrn3 is functionally conserved between yeast and human

We have cloned a human cDNA that is related to the RNA polymerase I transcription factor Rrn3 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The recombinant human protein displays both sequence similarity and immunological crossreactivity to yeast Rrn3 and is capable of rescuing a yeast strain carrying a disruption of the RRN3 gene in vivo. Point mutation of an amino acid that is conserved between the yeast and human proteins compromises the function of each factor, confirming that the observed sequence similarity is functionally significant. Rrn3 is the first RNA polymerase I-specific transcription factor shown to be functionally conserved between yeast and mammals, suggesting that at least one mechanism that regulates ribosomal RNA synthesis is conserved among eukaryotes.

Identification of a novel 70 kDa protein that binds to the core promoter element and is essential for ribosomal DNA transcription

Mammalian ribosomal RNA genes (rDNA) are transcribed by RNA polymerase I and at least two auxiliary factors, UBF and SL1/TFID/TIF-IB. It has also been reported that an additional factor(s) is required to reconstitute efficient initiation of rDNA transcription in vitro, depending upon the procedures of chromatographic separation. In an attempt to elucidate the molecular identity of such yet uncertain activities, we have developed agarose gel shift and UV cross-linking assays to detect proteins directly bound to the core promoter region of murine rDNA. With these techniques, we identified a 70 kDa protein (p70) in the flow-through fraction of a phosphocellulose column (TFIA-fraction). Interestingly, the binding of p70 to the rDNA core promoter was observed only in the presence of the SL1-containing fraction. The probable human orthologue of p70 was also detected in HeLa cells. Consistent with the observation that p70 bound to the core promoter only in the presence of the TFIA- and SL1-fractions, alteration of DNase I footprint pattern over the core promoter element was demonstrated by cooperative action of the TFIA- and SL1-fractions. A reconstituted in vitro transcription assay with further purified p70 indicated that p70 was required for accurate initiation of rDNA transcription. These results indicate that the p70 identified recently by the current DNA-binding experiments represents a novel transcription factor in rDNA transcription.

The nucleolus: a paradigm for cell proliferation and aging

The nucleolus is the cellular site of ribosome biosynthesis. At this site, active ribosomal DNA (rDNA) genes are rapidly transcribed by RNA polymerase I (pol I) molecules. Recent advances in our understanding of the pol I transcription system have indicated that regulation of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) synthesis is a critical factor in cell growth. Importantly, the same signaling networks that control cell growth and proliferation and are deregulated in cancer appear to control pol I transcription. Therefore, the study of the biochemical basis for growth regulation of pol I transcription can provide basic information about the nuclear signaling network. Hopefully, this information may facilitate the search for drugs that can inhibit the growth of tumor cells by blocking pol I activation. In addition to its function in ribosome biogenesis, recent studies have revealed the prominent role of the nucleolus in cell senescence. These findings have stimulated a new wave of research on the functional relationship between the nucleolus and aging. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of some current topics in the area of nucleolus biology, and it has been written for a general readership.

Cell cycle-dependent regulation of RNA polymerase I transcription: the nucleolar transcription factor UBF is inactive in mitosis and early G1

Transcription of ribosomal RNA genes by RNA polymerase (pol) I oscillates during the cell cycle, being maximal in S and G2 phase, repressed during mitosis, and gradually recovering during G1 progression. We have shown that transcription initiation factor (TIF)-IB/SL1 is inactivated during mitosis by cdc2/cyclin B-directed phosphorylation of TAFI110. In this study, we have monitored reactivation of transcription after exit from mitosis. We demonstrate that the pol I factor UBF is also inactivated by phosphorylation but recovers with different kinetics than TIF-IB/SL1. Whereas TIF-IB/SL1 activity is rapidly regained on entry into G1, UBF is reactivated later in G1, concomitant with the onset of pol I transcription. Repression of pol I transcription in mitosis and early G1 can be reproduced with either extracts from cells synchronized in M or G1 phase or with purified TIF-IB/SL1 and UBF isolated in the presence of phosphatase inhibitors. The results suggest that two basal transcription factors, e.g., TIF-IB/SL1 and UBF, are inactivated at mitosis and reactivated by dephosphorylation at the exit from mitosis and during G1 progression, respectively.

Regulation of mammalian ribosomal gene transcription by RNA polymerase I

All cells, from prokaryotes to vertebrates, synthesize vast amounts of ribosomal RNA to produce the several million new ribosomes per generation that are required to maintain the protein synthetic capacity of the daughter cells. Ribosomal gene (rDNA) transcription is governed by RNA polymerase I (Pol I) assisted by a dedicated set of transcription factors that mediate the specificity of transcription and are the targets of the pleiotrophic pathways the cell uses to adapt rRNA synthesis to cell growth. In the past few years we have begun to understand the specific functions of individual factors involved in rDNA transcription and to elucidate on a molecular level how transcriptional regulation is achieved. This article reviews our present knowledge of the molecular mechanism of rDNA transcriptional regulation.

Transactivation of a ribosomal gene by simian virus 40 large-T antigen requires at least three activities of the protein

Simian virus 40 large-T antigen transactivates the ribosomal genes which are transcribed by RNA polymerase (pol I), as well as genes that are dependent on either pol II or pol III. This report identifies regions and activities of T antigen that are required to transactivate a pol I-dependent rat ribosomal gene promoter. By using the rat ribosomal gene (rDNA) promoter linked to a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene, we show that at least three separable T-antigen regions are necessary to achieve wild-type levels of transactivation of rDNA in transiently transfected monkey cells. One activity depends on the region of T antigen shared with small-t antigen (T/t common region). A second activity maps to amino acids 109 to 626 and is highly sensitive to mutational inactivation. Complementation analyses suggest that at least one activity in this region is independent of and must be in cis with the activity within the T/t common region. In addition, a functional nuclear localization signal is required for maximal T-antigen-mediated transactivation of rat rDNA. The three activities work in concert to override cellular species-specific controls and transactivate the rat ribosomal gene promoter. Finally, we provide evidence that although the tumor suppressor protein Rb has been shown to repress a pol I-dependent promoter, transactivation of the rat rDNA promoter does not depend on T antigen's ability to bind the tumor suppressor product Rb.

Mitotic silencing of human rRNA synthesis: inactivation of the promoter selectivity factor SL1 by cdc2/cyclin B-mediated phosphorylation

We have used a reconstituted cell-free transcription system to investigate the molecular basis of mitotic repression of RNA polymerase I (pol I) transcription. We demonstrate that SL1, the TBP-containing promoter-binding factor, is inactivated by cdc2/cyclin B-directed phosphorylation, and reactivated by dephosphorylation. Transcriptional inactivation in vitro is accompanied by phosphorylation of two subunits, e.g. TBP and hTAFI110. To distinguish whether transcriptional repression is due to phosphorylation of TBP, hTAFI110 or both, SL1 was purified from two HeLa cell lines that express either full-length or the core domain of TBP only. Both TBP-TAFI complexes exhibit similar activity and both are repressed at mitosis, indicating that the variable N-terminal domain which contains multiple target sites for cdc2/cyclin B phosphorylation is dispensable for mitotic repression. Protein-protein interaction studies reveal that mitotic phosphorylation impairs the interaction of SL1 with UBF. The results suggest that phosphorylation of SL1 is used as a molecular switch to prevent pre-initiation complex formation and to shut down rDNA transcription at mitosis.

Mitotic phosphorylation of the TBP-containing factor SL1 represses ribosomal gene transcription

Entry into mitosis is accompanied by a global repression of transcription. To investigate the molecular mechanisms which shut-down rRNA synthesis during mitosis, we have compared RNA polymerase I (Pol I) transcription in extracts from asynchronous and mitotic HeLa cells. We show by several experimental approaches that phosphorylation by cdc2/cyclin B inactivates the TBP-containing factor SL1 and thus abrogates Pol I transcription during mitosis. This finding links the cell's cycle with the transcriptional activity of Pol I and suggests a common mechanism for mitotic silencing of all three classes of nuclear RNA polymerases, i.e. reversible inactivation of the respective TBP-TAF complexes by (a) mitotic kinase(s).

A novel transcription initiation factor (TIF), TIF-IE, is required for homogeneous Acanthamoeba castellanii TIF-IB (SL1) to form a committed complex

The fundamental transcription initiation factor (TIF) for ribosomal RNA expression by eukaryotic RNA polymerase I, TIF-IB, has been purified to near homogeneity from Acanthamoeba castellanii using standard techniques. The purified factor consists of the TATA-binding protein and four TATA-binding protein-associated factors with relative molecular weights of 145,000, 99,000, 96,000, and 91,000. This yields a calculated native molecular weight of 460, 000, which compares well with its mass determined by scanning transmission electron microscopy (493,000) and its sedimentation rate, which is close to RNA polymerase I (515,000). Both impure and nearly homogeneous TIF-IB exhibit an apparent equilibrium dissociation constant of 56 +/- 3 pM. However, although impure TIF-IB can form a promoter-DNA complex resistant to challenge by other promoter-containing DNAs, near homogeneous TIF-IB cannot do so. An additional transcription factor, dubbed TIF-IE, restores the ability of near homogeneous TIF-IB to sequester DNA into a committed complex.

Partially processed pre-rRNA is preserved in association with processing components in nucleolus-derived foci during mitosis

Previous studies showed that components implicated in pre-rRNA processing, including U3 small nucleolar (sno)RNA, fibrillarin, nucleolin, and proteins B23 and p52, accumulate in perichromosomal regions and in numerous mitotic cytoplasmic particles, termed nucleolus-derived foci (NDF) between early anaphase and late telophase. The latter structures were analyzed for the presence of pre-rRNA by fluorescence in situ hybridization using probes for segments of pre-rRNA with known half-lives. The NDF did not contain the short-lived 5'-external transcribed spacer (ETS) leader segment upstream from the primary processing site in 47S pre-rRNA. However, the NDF contained sequences from the 5'-ETS core, 18S, internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1), and 28S segments and also had detectable, but significantly reduced, levels of the 3'-ETS sequence. Northern analyses showed that in mitotic cells, the latter sequences were present predominantly in 45S-46S pre-rRNAs, indicating that high-molecular weight processing intermediates are preserved during mitosis. Two additional essential processing components were also found in the NDF: U8 snoRNA and hPop1 (a protein component of RNase MRP and RNase P). Thus, the NDF appear to be large complexes containing partially processed pre-rRNA associated with processing components in which processing has been significantly suppressed. The NDF may facilitate coordinated assembly of postmitotic nucleoli.

A specialized form of RNA polymerase I, essential for initiation and growth-dependent regulation of rRNA synthesis, is disrupted during transcription

Only a small proportion (<2%) of RNA polymerase I (pol I) from whole-cell extracts appeared to be competent for specific initiation at the ribosomal gene promoter in a yeast reconstituted transcription system. Initiation-competent pol I molecules were found exclusively in salt-resistant complexes that contain the pol I-specific initiation factor Rrn3p. Levels of initiation-competent complexes in extracts were independent of total Rrn3p content and varied with the growth state of the cells. Although extracts from stationary phase cells contained substantial amounts of Rrn3p and pol I, they lacked the pol I-Rrn3p complex and were inactive in promoter-dependent transcription. Activity was restored by adding purified pol I-Rrn3p complex to extracts from stationary phase cells. The pol I-Rrn3p complex dissociated during transcription and lost its capacity for subsequent reinitiation in vitro, suggesting a stoichiometric rather than a catalytic activity in initiation. We propose that the formation and disruption of the pol I-Rrn3p complex reflects a molecular switch for regulating rRNA synthesis and its growth rate-dependent regulation.

Mammalian RNA polymerase I exists as a holoenzyme with associated basal transcription factors

Transcription initiation of ribosomal RNA genes requires RNA polymerase I (Pol I) and auxiliary factors which either bind directly to the rDNA promoter, e.g. TIF-IB/SL1 and UBF, or are assembled into productive transcription initiation complexes via interaction with Pol I, e.g. TIF-IA, and TIF-IC. Here we show that all components required for specific rDNA transcription initiation are capable of physical interaction with Pol I in the absence of DNA and can be co-immunoprecipitated with antibodies against defined subunits of murine Pol I. Sucrose gradient centrifugation and fractionation on gel filtration columns reveals that approximately 10% of cellular Pol I elutes as a defined complex with an apparent molecular mass of > 2000 kDa. The large Pol I complex contains saturating levels of TIF-IA, TIF-IB and UBF, but limiting amounts of TIF-IC. In support of the existence of a functional complex between Pol I and basal factors, the large complex is transcriptionally active after complementation with TIF-IC. The results suggest that, analogous to class II gene transcription, a pre-assembled complex, the "Pol I holoenzyme", exists that appears to be the initiation-competent form of Pol I.

Resolution of RNA polymerase I into dimers and monomers and their function in transcription

We have further analyzed the requirements of yeast RNA polymerase I (pol I) to initiate transcription at the ribosomal gene promoter. Resolution of yeast whole cell extracts through several chromatographic steps yielded three protein fractions required for accurate initiation. One fraction is composed of TBP associated within a 240 kDa protein complex. The fraction contributing the RNA polymerase I (pol I) activity consists of dimeric and monomeric pol I under conditions optimal for in vitro transcription. The capability to utilize the ribosomal gene promoter correlates with monomeric pol I complexes which are possibly associated with further transcription factors. These initiation competent pol I complexes appeared to be resistant to high salt concentrations. Pol I dimers which represent the majority of the isolated pol I, can be reversibly dissociated into monomers and are only active in non-specific RNA synthesis, if single stranded DNA serves as a template. We suggest a model in which dimeric inactive pol I is converted into an active monomeric form that might be associated with other transcription factors to maintain a stable initiation competent complex.

The fundamental ribosomal RNA transcription initiation factor-IB (TIF-IB, SL1, factor D) binds to the rRNA core promoter primarily by minor groove contacts

Acanthamoeba castellanii transcription initiation factor-IB (TIF-IB) is the TATA-binding protein-containing transcription factor that binds the rRNA promoter to form the committed complex. Minor groove-specific drugs inhibit TIF-IB binding, with higher concentrations needed to disrupt preformed complexes because of drug exclusion by bound TIF-IB. TIF-IB/DNA interactions were mapped by hydroxyl radical and uranyl nitrate footprinting. TIF-IB contacts four minor grooves in its binding site. TIF-IB and DNA wrap around each other in a right-handed superhelix of high pitch, so the upstream and downstream contacts are on opposite faces of the helix. Dimethyl sulfate protection assays revealed limited contact with a few guanines in the major groove. This detailed analysis suggests significant DNA conformation dependence of the interaction.

An RNA polymerase III-defective mutation in TATA-binding protein disrupts its interaction with a transcription factor IIIB subunit in drosophila cells

A subunit of the Drosophila RNA polymerase III transcription factor IIIB (TFIIIB) complex has been identified using antibodies directed against the analogous human protein, hIIIB90. This protein has an apparent molecular mass of 105 kDa and has been designated dTAFIII105. Drosophila S-2 cell extracts that were immunodepleted of dTAFIII105 were substantially reduced in their capacity to support tRNA gene transcription. A protein (far Western) blot analysis revealed that dTAFIII105, present in a TFIIIB fraction, directly interacts with TATA-binding protein (TBP). Coimmunoprecipitation assays demonstrated that this protein associates with TBP in S-2 cell extracts. Our previous studies have identified a mutation at position 332 within Drosophila TBP that changes a highly conserved arginine residue to a histidine residue, which renders it specifically defective in its ability to support RNA polymerase III transcription in S-2 cells (Trivedi, A., Vilalta, A., Gopalan, S., and Johnson, D. L. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 6909-6916). We further demonstrate that extracts prepared from a stable cell line expressing epitope-tagged wild-type TBP exhibit an increase in tRNA gene transcription, whereas extracts derived from cells expressing the mutant TBP protein do not. Coimmunoprecipitation assays and far Western blot analysis demonstrate that this mutation in TBP abolishes its ability to stably interact with dTAFIII105. Thus, we have identified both a Drosophila protein that is directly associated with TBP in the TFIIIB complex, dTAFIII105, and an amino acid residue within the highly conserved carboxyl-terminal region of TBP that is critical for dTAFIII105-TBP interactions.

SV40 large T antigen binds to the TBP-TAF(I) complex SL1 and coactivates ribosomal RNA transcription

SV40 large T antigen is a multifunctional regulatory protein that plays a key role in the viral life cycle and can stimulate cell proliferation. To accomplish this, large T antigen has to control the expression of cellular genes involved in cell cycle progression and cell growth. rRNA synthesis by RNA polymerase I (Pol I) is tightly associated with cell growth and proliferation, and previous studies indicated that large T antigen up-regulates RNA Pol I transcription in SV40-infected cells. How this process occurs is currently unclear. To investigate the mechanisms of large T antigen stimulation of RNA Pol I transcription, we have established an in vitro transcription system that is responsive to large T antigen. Here, we show that recombinant large T antigen stimulates Pol I transcription reconstituted with purified RNA Pol I, UBF, and the TBP/TAF complex SL1. Immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that large T antigen directly binds to SL1, in vitro, as well as in SV40-infected cells. In addition, our data indicate that this interaction occurs by direct association with three SL1 subunits, namely TBP, TAF(I)48, and TAF(I)110. Transcription studies with large T antigen deletion mutants show that the 538-amino-acid amino-terminal domain is necessary for full stimulation of Pol I transcription. Importantly, mutants that no longer bind to SL1 are also unable to stimulate Pol I transcription. This indicates that recruitment of large T antigen to the rRNA promoter by SL1 constitutes a crucial step in the activation process. Taken together with recent studies on large T antigen activation of RNA Pol II transcription, these results suggest that viral modulation of genes involved in cell proliferation involves direct targeting of promoter-specific TBP/TAF complexes (i.e., SL1 or TFIID) by large T antigen.

An immunoaffinity purified Schizosaccharomyces pombe TBP-containing complex directs correct initiation of the S.pombe rRNA gene promoter

The multi-protein complex SL1, containing TBP, which is essential for RNA polymerase I catalyzed transcription, has been analyzed in fission yeast. It was immunopurified based on association of component subunits with epitope-tagged TBP. To enable this analysis, a strain of Schizosaccharomyces pombe was created where the only functional TBP coding sequences were those of FLAG-TBP. RNA polymerase I transcription components were fractionated from this strain and the TBP-associated polypeptides were subsequently immunopurified together with the epitope- tagged TBP. An assessment of the activity of this candidate SL1 complex was undertaken cross-species. This fission yeast TBP-containing complex displays two activities in redirecting transcriptional initiation of an S. pombe rDNA gene promoter cross-species in Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcription reactions: it both blocks an incorrect transcriptional start site at +7 and directs initiation at the correct site for S. pombe rRNA synthesis. This complex is essential for accurate initiation of the S.pombe rRNA gene: rRNA synthesis is reconstituted when this S.pombe TBP-containing complex is combined with a S.pombe fraction immunodepleted of TBP.

Cloning of murine RNA polymerase I-specific TAF factors: conserved interactions between the subunits of the species-specific transcription initiation factor TIF-IB/SL1

Promoter selectivity for all three classes of eukaryotic RNA polymerases is brought about by multimeric protein complexes containing TATA box binding protein (TBP) and specific TBP-associated factors (TAFs). Unlike class II- and III-specific TBP-TAF complexes, the corresponding murine and human class I-specific transcription initiation factor TIF-IB/SL1 exhibits a pronounced selectivity for its homologous promoter. As a first step toward understanding the molecular basis of species-specific promoter recognition, we cloned the cDNAs encoding the three mouse pol I-specific TBP-associated factors (TAFIs) and compared the amino acid sequences of the murine TAFIs with their human counterparts. The four subunits from either species can form stable chimeric complexes that contain stoichiometric amounts of TBP and TAFIs, demonstrating that differences in the primary structure of human and mouse TAFIs do not dramatically alter the network of protein-protein contacts responsible for assembly of the multimeric complex. Thus, primate vs. rodent promoter selectivity mediated by the TBP-TAFI complex is likely to be the result of cumulative subtle differences between individual subunits that lead to species-specific properties of RNA polymerase I transcription.

The Xenopus RNA polymerase I transcription factor, UBF, has a role in transcriptional enhancement distinct from that at the promoter

Repeated sequence elements found upstream of the ribosomal gene promoter in Xenopus function as RNA polymerase I-specific transcriptional enhancers. Here we describe an in vitro system in which these enhancers function in many respects as in vivo. The principal requirement for enhancer function in vitro is the presence of a high concentration of upstream binding factor (UBF). This system is utilized to demonstrate that enhancers function by increasing the probability of a stable transcription complex forming on the adjacent promoter. Species differences in UBF are utilized to demonstrate that enhancers do not act by recruiting UBF to the promoter, rather UBF performs its own distinct role at the enhancers. UBF function in enhancement differs from that at the promoter, as it is flexible with respect to both the species of UBF and the enhancer element employed. Additionally, we identify a potential role for the mammalian UBF splice variant, UBF2, in enhancer function. We demonstrate that the TATA box binding protein (TBP)-containing component of Xenopus RNA polymerase I transcription, Rib1, can interact with an enhancer-UBF complex. This suggests a model in which enhancers act by recruiting Rib1 to the promoter.

A novel 66-kilodalton protein complexes with Rrn6, Rrn7, and TATA-binding protein to promote polymerase I transcription initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

We report the cloning of RRN11, a gene coding for a 66-kDa protein essential for transcription initiation by RNA polymerase I (Pol I) in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Rrn11 specifically complexes with two previously identified transcription factors, Rrn6 and Rrn7 (D. A. Keys, J. S. Steffan, J. A. Dodd, R. T. Yamamoto, Y. Nogi, and M. Nomura, Genes Dev. 8:2349-2362, 1994). The Rrn11-Rrn6-Rrn7 complex also binds the TATA-binding protein and is required for transcription by the core domain of the Pol I promoter. Therefore, we have designated the Rrn11-Rrn6-Rrn7-TATA-binding protein complex the yeast Pol I core factor. A two-hybrid assay was used to demonstrate involvement of short leucine heptad repeats on both Rrn11 and Rrn6 in the in vivo association of these two proteins. This assay also verified the previously described strong association between Rrn6 and Rrn7, independent of the Rrn6 leucine repeat.

The role of TBP in rDNA transcription by RNA polymerase I in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: TBP is required for upstream activation factor-dependent recruitment of core factor

Transcription of Saccharomyces cerevisiae rDNA by RNA polymerase I involves at least two transcription factors characterized previously: upstream activation factor (UAF) consisting of Rrn5p, Rrn9p, Rrn10p, and two more uncharacterized proteins; and core factor (CF) consisting of Rrn6p, Rrn7p, and Rrn11p. UAF interacts directly with an upstream element of the promoter and mediates its stimulatory function, and CF subsequently joins a stable preinitiation complex. The TATA-binding protein (TBP) has been known to be involved in transcription by all three nuclear RNA polymerases. We found that TBP interacts specifically with both UAF and CF, the interaction with UAF being stronger than that with CF. Using extracts from a TBP (I143N) mutant, it was shown that TBP is required for stimulation of transcription mediated by the upstream element, but not for basal transcription directed by a template without the upstream element. By template competition experiments, it was shown that TBP is required for UAF-dependent recruitment of CF to the rDNA promoter, explaining the TBP requirement for stimulatory activity of the upstream element. We also studied protein-protein interactions and found specific interactions of TBP with Rrn6p and with Rrn9p both in vitro and in the yeast two-hybrid system in vivo. Thus, these two interactions may be involved in the interactions of TBP with CF and UAF, respectively, contributing to the recruitment of CF to the rDNA promoter. Additionally, we observed an interaction between Rrn9p and Rrn7p both in vitro and in the two-hybrid system; thus, this interaction might also contribute to the recruitment of CF.

Upstream binding factor stabilizes Rib 1, the TATA-binding-protein-containing Xenopus laevis RNA polymerase I transcription factor, by multiple protein interactions in a DNA-independent manner

Initiation of RNA polymerase I transcription in Xenopus laevis requires Rib 1 and upstream binding factor (UBF). UBF and Rib 1 combine to form a stable transcription complex on the Xenopus ribosomal gene promoter. Here we show that Rib 1 comprises TATA-binding protein (TBP) and TBP-associated factor components. Thus, Rib 1 is the Xenopus equivalent of mammalian SL 1. In contrast to SL 1, Rib 1 is an unstable complex that readily dissociates into TBP and associated components. We identify a novel function for UBF in stabilizing Rib 1 by multiple protein interactions. This stabilization occurs in solution in a DNA-independent manner. These results may partially explain the difference in UBF requirement between Xenopus and mammalian systems.

RRN11 encodes the third subunit of the complex containing Rrn6p and Rrn7p that is essential for the initiation of rDNA transcription by yeast RNA polymerase I

A new gene, RRN11, has been defined by certain rrn mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae which are defective specifically in the transcription of 35 S rRNA gene by RNA polymerase I (pol I). We have cloned the gene and found that it encodes a protein of 507 amino acids. We have used a strain with the chromosomal RRN11 deleted and carrying HA1 epitope-tagged RRN11 on a plasmid to isolate a protein complex containing the protein encoded by RRN11. This protein complex complemented rrn6 mutant extracts, which were previously shown to be deficient in the essential pol I transcription factor called Rrn6/7 complex or core factor (CF). The CF complex was previously shown to consist of three proteins, the 102- and 60-kDa subunits encoded by RRN6 and RRN7, respectively, and the 66-kDa subunit. The results of the above complementation experiments combined with mobility of Rrn11p in SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis relative to Rrn6p and Rrn7p led to the conclusion that RRN11 encodes the 66-kDa subunit of CF. Glutathione S-transferase-Rrn11p fusion protein was found to bind strongly to 35S-labeled Rrn6p and Rrn7p but only weakly to 35S-labeled TATA-binding protein. Similarly, glutathione S-transferase-Rrn7p fusion protein bound strongly to 35S-labeled Rrn6p and Rrn11p but only weakly to 35S-labeled TATA-binding protein. These results are consistent with the fact that one can purify CF consisting of Rrn6p, Rrn7p, and Rrn11p from yeast cell extracts, but the purified complex does not contain TATA-binding protein. RRN11 was shown to be an essential gene, and [3H]uridine pulse experiments demonstrated directly that RRN11 is essential for rDNA transcription by pol I in vivo. Thus all three subunits of CF are essential for rDNA transcription. Because of the resemblance of CF to mammalian essential pol I transcription factor SL1, the amino acid sequences of Rrn11p and the other two subunits of CF were compared with those of the three TATA-binding protein-associated factors (TAFs) in the human SL1, TAFI48, TAFI63, and TAFI110. No significant similarity was detected between two sets of the proteins. Similarity as well as differences between CF and SL1 are discussed.