Repair of rDNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: RAD4-independent strand-specific nucleotide excision repair of RNA polymerase I transcribed genes

A half century of exploring DNA excision repair in chromatin

DNA in eukaryotic cells is packaged into the compact and dynamic structure of chromatin. This packaging is a double-edged sword for DNA repair and genomic stability. Chromatin restricts the access of repair proteins to DNA lesions embedded in nucleosomes and higher order chromatin structures. However, chromatin also serves as a signaling platform in which post-translational modifications of histones and other chromatin-bound proteins promote lesion recognition and repair. Similarly, chromatin modulates the formation of DNA damage, promoting or suppressing lesion formation depending on the chromatin context. Therefore, the modulation of DNA damage and its repair in chromatin is crucial to our understanding of the fate of potentially mutagenic and carcinogenic lesions in DNA. Here, we survey many of the landmark findings on DNA damage and repair in chromatin over the last 50 years (i.e., since the beginning of this field), focusing on excision repair, the first repair mechanism studied in the chromatin landscape. For example, we highlight how the impact of chromatin on these processes explains the distinct patterns of somatic mutations observed in cancer genomes.

The Efficiency of Global Genome-Nucleotide Excision Repair is Linked to the Fraction of Open rRNA Gene Chromatin, in Yeast

The yeast rDNA locus is a suitable model to study nucleotide excision repair (NER) in chromatin. A portion of rRNA genes is transcribed and largely depleted of nucleosomes, the remaining genes are not transcribed and folded in nucleosomes. In G1-arrested cells, most rRNA genes do not have nucleosomes. TC-NER removes UV-induced DNA lesions from the transcribed strand of active genes. GG-NER is less efficient and removes DNA lesions from the nontranscribed strand of active genes and from the inactive genome. Different from mammalian cells, in yeast, the rRNA gene-transcribed strand is repaired by RNA polymerase-I-dependent TC-NER. The opposite nontranscribed strand is repaired faster than both strands of inactive rRNA genes. In log-phase cells, RNA polymerase-I are dislodged from the damaged transcribed strand and partially replaced by nucleosomes. Contrary to log-phase cells, in G1-phase cells few, if any, histones are deposited on the open rRNA genes during NER. In this study, we compared GG-NER efficiency in the rRNA gene coding region: without nucleosomes, partially loaded or wholly loaded with nucleosomes. The results indicate that in log-phase cells histones obstruct GG-NER, whereas in G1-phase cells GG-NER is as efficient as TC-NER.

Mechanistic insights in transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair of ribosomal DNA

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) guarantees genome integrity against UV light-induced DNA damage. After UV irradiation, cells have to cope with a general transcriptional block. To ensure UV lesions repair specifically on transcribed genes, NER is coupled with transcription in an extremely organized pathway known as transcription-coupled repair. In highly metabolic cells, more than 60% of total cellular transcription results from RNA polymerase I activity. Repair of the mammalian transcribed ribosomal DNA has been scarcely studied. UV lesions severely block RNA polymerase I activity and the full transcription-coupled repair machinery corrects damage on actively transcribed ribosomal DNAs. After UV irradiation, RNA polymerase I is more bound to the ribosomal DNA and both are displaced to the nucleolar periphery. Importantly, the reentry of RNA polymerase I and the ribosomal DNA is dependent on the presence of UV lesions on DNA and independent of transcription restart.

RNA Polymerase-I-Dependent Transcription-coupled Nucleotide Excision Repair of UV-Induced DNA Lesions at Transcription Termination Sites, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

If not repaired, ultraviolet light-induced DNA damage can lead to genome instability. Nucleotide excision repair (NER) of UV photoproducts is generally fast in the coding region of genes, where RNA polymerase-II (RNAP2) arrest at damage sites and trigger transcription-coupled NER (TC-NER). In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, there is RNA polymerase-I (RNAP1)-dependent TC-NER, but this process remains elusive. Therefore, we wished to characterize TC-NER efficiency in different regions of the rDNA locus: where RNAP1 are present at high density and start transcription elongation, where the elongation rate is slow, and in the transcription terminator where RNAP1 pause, accumulate and then are released. The Rpa12 subunit of RNAP1 and the Nsi1 protein participate in transcription termination, and NER efficiency was compared between wild type and cells lacking Rpa12 or Nsi1. The presence of RNAP1 was determined by chromatin endogenous cleavage and chromatin immunoprecipitation, and repair was followed at nucleotide precision with an assay that is based on the blockage of Taq polymerase by UV photoproducts. We describe that TC-NER, which is modulated by the RNAP1 level and elongation rate, ends at the 35S rRNA gene transcription termination site.

Rad7 E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Attenuates Polyubiquitylation of Rpn10 and Dsk2 Following DNA Damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

During Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER) in the yeast S. cerevisiae, ubiquitylation of Rad4 is carried out by the E3 ubiquitin ligase that includes Rad7-Elc1-Cul3 and is critical to optimal NER. Rad7 E3 activity targets Rad4 for degradation by the proteaseome but, in principle, could also trigger other DNA damage responses. We observed increased nuclear ubiquitin foci (Ub-RFP) formation in S. cerevisiae containing a Rad7 E3 ligase mutant (rad7SOCS) in response to DNA damage by benzo[a]pyrenediolepoxide (BPDE) in dividing cells. Immunoblots reveal that ubiquitin conjugates of Rpn10 and Dsk2 accumulate in greater abundance in rad7SOCS compared to RAD7 in dividing cells in response to BPDE which makes Rpn10 and Dsk2 candidates for being the ubiquitylated species observed in our microscopy experiments. Microscopy analysis with strains containing Dsk2-GFP shows that Dsk2-GFP and Dsk2-GFP/Ub-RFP colocalized in nuclear foci form to an increased extent in a rad7SOCS mutant background in dividing cells than in a RAD7 wild-type strain. Further, Dsk2-GFP in the rad7SOCS strain formed more foci at the plasma membrane following BPDE treatment in dividing cells relative to strains containing RAD7 or a rad7Δ deletion mutant. In response to a different agent, UV irradiation, levels of ubiquitylated proteins were increased in rad7SOCS relative to RAD7, and the proteasomal deubiquitylase subunit, Rpn11 was even monoubiquitylated in the absence of damaging agents. Together these data show that Rad7 E3 activity attenuates ubiquitylation of proteins regulating the shuttling of polyubiquitylated proteins to the proteasome (Dsk2 and Rpn10) and removal of ubiquitin chains just prior to degradation (Rpn11). Since Rad7 E3 ligase activity has been shown to increase ubiquitylation of its target proteins, yet our results show increased ubiquitylation in the absence of Rad7 E3, we suggest that Rad7 E3 action regulates ubiquitin ligase and deubiquitylase (DUB) activities that act on Rpn10, Dsk2 and Rpn11.

Repair of UV induced DNA lesions in ribosomal gene chromatin and the role of "Odd" RNA polymerases (I and III)

In fast growing eukaryotic cells, a subset of rRNA genes are transcribed at very high rates by RNA polymerase I (RNAPI). Nuclease digestion-assays and psoralen crosslinking have shown that they are open; that is, largely devoid of nucleosomes. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisae, nucleotide excision repair (NER) and photolyase remove UV photoproducts faster from open rRNA genes than from closed and nucleosome-loaded inactive rRNA genes. After UV irradiation, rRNA transcription declines because RNAPI halt at UV photoproducts and are then displaced from the transcribed strand. When the DNA lesion is quickly recognized by NER, it is the sub-pathway transcription-coupled TC-NER that removes the UV photoproduct. If dislodged RNAPI are replaced by nucleosomes before NER recognizes the lesion, then it is the sub-pathway global genome GG-NER that removes the UV photoproducts from the transcribed strand. Also, GG-NER maneuvers in the non-transcribed strand of open genes and in both strands of closed rRNA genes. After repair, transcription resumes and elongating RNAPI reopen the rRNA gene. In higher eukaryotes, NER in rRNA genes is inefficient and there is no evidence for TC-NER. Moreover, TC-NER does not occur in RNA polymerase III transcribed genes of both, yeast and human fibroblast.

Differential participation of homologous recombination and nucleotide excision repair in yeast survival to ultraviolet light radiation

AIMS

The purpose of this research was to assess the ultraviolet light (UV) phenotype of yeast sirDelta cells vs. WT cells, and to determine whether de-silenced chromatin or the intrinsic pseudoploidy of sirDelta mutants contributes to their response to UV. Additional aims were to study the participation of HR and NER in promoting UV survival during the cell cycle, and to define the extent of the co-participation for both repair pathways.

MAIN METHODS

The sensitivity of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to UV light was determined using a method based on automatic measurements of optical densities of very small (100mul) liquid cell cultures.

KEY FINDINGS

We show that pseudo-diploidy of sirDelta strains promotes resistance to UV irradiation and that HR is the main mechanism that is responsible for this phenotype. In addition, HR together with GG-NER renders cells in the G2-phase of the cell cycle more resistant to UV irradiation than cells in the G1-phase, which underscore the importance of HR when two copies of the chromosomes are present. Nevertheless, in asynchronously growing cells NER is the main repair pathway that responds to UV induced DNA damage.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study provides detailed and quantitative information on the co-participation of HR and NER in UV survival of yeast cells.

Nucleotide excision repair and photolyase repair of UV photoproducts in nucleosomes: assessing the existence of nucleosome and non-nucleosome rDNA chromatin in vivo

The genome is organized into nuclear domains, which create microenvironments that favor distinct chromatin structures and functions (e.g., highly repetitive sequences, centromeres, telomeres, noncoding sequences, inactive genes, RNA polymerase II and III transcribed genes, and the nucleolus). Correlations have been drawn between gene silencing and proximity to a heterochromatic compartment. At the other end of the scale are ribosomal genes, which are transcribed at a very high rate by RNA polymerase I (~60% of total transcription), have a loose chromatin structure, and are clustered in the nucleolus. The rDNA sequences have 2 distinct structures: active rRNA genes, which have no nucleosomes; and inactive rRNA genes, which have nucleosomes. Like DNA transcription and replication, DNA repair is modulated by the structure of chromatin, and the kinetics of DNA repair vary among the nuclear domains. Although research on DNA repair in all chromosomal contexts is important to understand the mechanisms of genome maintenance, this review focuses on nucleotide excision repair and photolyase repair of UV photoproducts in the first-order packing of DNA in chromatin: the nucleosome. In addition, it summarizes the studies that have demonstrated the existence of the 2 rDNA chromatins, and the way this feature of the rDNA locus allows for direct comparison of DNA repair in 2 very different structures: nucleosome and non-nucleosome DNA.

Tilting at windmills? The nucleotide excision repair of chromosomal DNA

A typical view of how DNA repair functions in chromatin usually depicts a struggle in which the DNA repair machinery battles to overcome the inhibitory effect of chromatin on the repair process. It may be that in this current interpretation the repair mechanisms are 'tilting at windmills', fighting an imaginary foe. An emerging picture suggests that we should not consider chromatin as an inhibitory force to be overcome like some quixotic giant by the DNA repair processes. Instead we should now recognize that DNA repair and chromatin metabolism are inextricably and mechanistically linked. Here we discuss the latest findings which are beginning to reveal how changes in chromatin dynamics integrate with the DNA repair process in response to UV induced DNA damage, with an emphasis on events in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Complementary roles of yeast Rad4p and Rad34p in nucleotide excision repair of active and inactive rRNA gene chromatin

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) removes a plethora of DNA lesions. It is performed by a large multisubunit protein complex that finds and repairs damaged DNA in different chromatin contexts and nuclear domains. The nucleolus is the most transcriptionally active domain, and in yeast, transcription-coupled NER occurs in RNA polymerase I-transcribed genes (rDNA). Here we have analyzed the roles of two members of the xeroderma pigmentosum group C family of proteins, Rad4p and Rad34p, during NER in the active and inactive rDNA. We report that Rad4p is essential for repair in the intergenic spacer, the inactive rDNA coding region, and for strand-specific repair at the transcription initiation site, whereas Rad34p is not. Rad34p is necessary for transcription-coupled NER that starts about 40 nucleotides downstream of the transcription initiation site of the active rDNA, whereas Rad4p is not. Thus, although Rad4p and Rad34p share sequence homology, their roles in NER in the rDNA locus are almost entirely distinct and complementary. These results provide evidences that transcription-coupled NER and global genome NER participate in the removal of UV-induced DNA lesions from the transcribed strand of active rDNA. Furthermore, nonnucleosome rDNA is repaired faster than nucleosome rDNA, indicating that an open chromatin structure facilitates NER in vivo.

The yeast rDNA locus: a model system to study DNA repair in chromatin

Most of the studies on the effect of chromatin structure and chromatin remodeling on DNA repair are based on in vitro reconstituted assays. In such experiments individual nucleosomes are either released by nuclease digestion of native chromatin fibers or are assembled from purified histones. Though reconstituted assays are valid approaches to follow NER in chromatin they are of somehow limited physiological relevance since single core particles do not exist in vivo [K. van Holde, J. Zlatanova, The nucleosome core particle: does it have structural and physiological relevance? Bioessays 21 (1999) 776-778]. This is particularly true for studies involving core histones tails, as in their natural chromatin context histones tails participate in interactions that are not necessarily present in vitro [J.C. Hansen, C. Tse, A.P. Wolffe, Structure and function of the core histone N-termini: more than meets the eye, Biochemistry 37 (1998) 17637-17641; J.J. Hayes, J.C. Hansen, Nucleosomes and chromatin fiber, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11 (2001) 124-129]. Indeed it was found that human DNA ligase I has the capability to ligate a nick on the surface of a 215bp nucleosome but not a nick in a nucleosome lacking linker DNA, possibly because of forced interactions between histone tails and core DNA present in the latter complex [D.R. Chafin, J.M. Vitolo, L.A. Henricksen, B.A. Bambara, J.J. Hayes, Human DNA ligase I efficiently seals nicks in nucleosomes, EMBO J. 19 (2000) 5492-5501]. In addition, chromatin remodeling could also occur in the higher ordered folding of chromatin and involve multiple arrays of nucleosomes [P.J. Horn, C.L. Peterson, Chromatin higher order folding: wrapping up transcription, Science 297 (2002) 1824-1827]. By studying the chromatin structure of ribosomal genes in yeast, our knowledge of the fate of nucleosomes during transcription and DNA replication has improved considerably [R. Lucchini, J.M. Sogo, The dynamic structure of ribosomal RNA gene chromatin, in: M.R. Paule (Ed.), Transcription of Ribosomal RNA Genes by Eukaryotic RNA Polymerase I, Springer-Verlag/R.G. Landes Company, 1998, pp. 254-276]. How nuclear processes such as DNA repair take place in chromatin is still largely unknown, and in this review I discuss how the yeast rDNA locus may be exploited to investigate DNA repair and chromatin modification in vivo.

Efficient repair of bleomycin-induced double-strand breaks in barley ribosomal genes

Ability of barley ribosomal genes to cope with damage produced in vivo by the radiomimetic agent bleomycin was investigated. Repair kinetics of bleomycin-induced double-strand breaks in ribosomal and total genomic DNA was compared. Induction and repair of double-strand breaks in defined regions of the ribosomal genes was also analyzed. Preferential sensitivity of barley linker DNA towards bleomycin treatment in vivo was established. Relatively higher yield of initially induced double-strand breaks in genomic DNA in comparison to ribosomal DNA was also found. Fragments containing intergenic spacers of barley rRNA genes displayed higher sensitivity to bleomycin than the coding sequences. No heterogeneity in the repair of DSB between transcribed and non-transcribed regions of ribosomal genes was detected. Data indicate that DSB repair in barley rDNA, although more efficient than in genomic DNA, does not correlate with the activity of nucleolus organizer regions.

Rad33, a new factor involved in nucleotide excision repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae the Rad4-Rad23 complex is involved in initial damage recognition and responsible for recruiting the other NER proteins to the site of the lesion. The Rad4-Rad23 complex is essential for both NER subpathways, Transcription Coupled Repair (TCR) and Global Genome Repair (GGR). Previously, we reported on the role of the Rad4 homologue YDR314C in NER. YDR314C is essential for preferential repair of the transcribed strand in RNA pol I transcribed rDNA. In large scale interaction studies it was shown that YDR314C physically interacts with a small protein encoded by the ORF YML011C. In the present study we show that YML011C is involved in NER and we propose to designate the YML011C ORF RAD33. Cells deleted for RAD33 display intermediate UV sensitivity that is epistatic with NER. Strand specific repair analysis shows that GGR in RNA pol II transcribed regions is completely defective in rad33 mutants whereas TCR is still active, albeit much less efficient. In RNA pol I transcribed rDNA both GGR and TCR are fully dependent on Rad33. We show that in both rad23 and rad33 cells Rad4 and YDR314C protein levels are significantly reduced. The homology of YDR314C to Rad4, together with the similar relation of both proteins to Rad33 prompted us to propose RAD34 as name for the YDR314C gene. Although the rad23rad33 double mutant is considerably more UV sensitive than a rad23 or rad33 single mutant, deletion of RAD33 in a rad23 background does not lead to a further reduction of Rad4 or Rad34 protein levels. This suggests that the role of Rad33 is not solely the stabilization of Rad4 and Rad34 but that Rad33 has an additional role in NER.

Repair-independent chromatin assembly onto active ribosomal genes in yeast after UV irradiation

Chromatin rearrangements occur during repair of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) by nucleotide excision repair (NER). Thereafter, the original structure must be restored to retain normal genomic functions. How NER proceeds through nonnucleosomal chromatin and how open chromatin is reestablished after repair are unknown. We analyzed NER in ribosomal genes (rDNA), which are present in multiple copies but only a fraction are actively transcribed and nonnucleosomal. We show that removal of CPDs is fast in the active rDNA and that chromatin reorganization occurs during NER. Furthermore, chromatin assembles on nonnucleosomal rDNA during the early events of NER but in the absence of DNA repair. The resumption of transcription after removal of CPDs correlates with the reappearance of nonnucleosomal chromatin. To date, only the passage of replication machinery was thought to package ribosomal genes in nucleosomes. In this report, we show that early events after formation of UV photoproducts in DNA also promote chromatin assembly.

The Rad4 homologue YDR314C is essential for strand-specific repair of RNA polymerase I-transcribed rDNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Summary The Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein Rad4 is involved in damage recognition in nucleotide excision repair (NER). In RNA polymerase II-transcribed regions Rad4 is essential for both NER subpathways global genome repair (GGR) and transcription coupled repair (TCR). In ribosomal DNA (rDNA), however, the RNA polymerase I-transcribed strand can be repaired in the absence of Rad4. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae the YDR314C protein shows homology to Rad4. The possible involvement of YDR314C in NER was studied by analysing strand-specific cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) removal in both RNA pol I- and RNA pol II-transcribed genes. Here we show that the Rad4-independent repair of rDNA is dependent on YDR314C. Moreover, in Rad4 proficient cells preferential repair of the transcribed strand of RNA pol I-transcribed genes was lost after deletion of YDR314C, demonstrating that Rad4 cannot replace YDR314C. CPD removal from the RNA pol II-transcribed RPB2 gene was unaffected in ydr314c mutants. We conclude that the two homologous proteins Rad4 and YDR314C are both involved in NER and probably have a similar function, but operate at different loci in the genome and are unable to replace each other.

Homologous recombination is a highly conserved determinant of the synergistic cytotoxicity between cisplatin and DNA topoisomerase I poisons

Phase I and II clinical trails are currently investigating the antitumor activity of cisplatin and camptothecins (CPTs; DNA topoisomerase I poisons), based on the dramatic synergistic cytotoxicity of these agents in some preclinical models. However, the mechanistic basis for this synergism is poorly understood. By exploiting the evolutionary conservation of DNA repair pathways from genetically tractable organisms such as budding and fission yeasts to mammalian cells, we demonstrate that the synergism of CPT and cisplatin requires homologous recombination. In yeast and mammalian cell lines defective for RAD52 and XRCC2/3, respectively, the combination of these agents proved antagonistic, while greater than additive activity was evident in isogenic wild-type cells. Homologous recombination appears to mediate a similar interaction of X-rays and CPT, but antagonizes the synergism of cytarabine (Ara-C) with CPT. These findings suggest that homologous recombination comprises an evolutionarily conserved determinant of cellular sensitivity when CPTs are used in combination with other therapeutics.

Induction and recovery of double-strand breaks in barley ribosomal DNA

Barley nucleolus organizing regions (NORs) were previously found to behave as prominent aberration hot-spots after treatment with some restriction endonucleases. The ability of MspI for directed induction of double-strand breaks in barley ribosomal DNA was further analyzed. Ionizing radiation-produced strand breakage within the ribosomal gene clusters was also a subject of investigation. Reconstructed barley karyotypes T1586 and T35 with normal and increased expression of rRNA genes were utilized to evaluate the relationship between transcriptional activity and damage induction. Scanning densitometry of the hybridization profiles revealed that MspI is generating double-strand breaks in barley rDNA with efficiency being independent from the NOR activity. Damage induction observed after treatment with gamma-rays was also not influenced by the transcriptional status of the ribosomal genes. A tendency towards restoration of rDNA integrity after irradiation of both germinating and dry seeds was observed which is indicative for the efficient recovery of double-strand breaks in barley ribosomal DNA.

Anticancer drug resistance induced by disruption of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae NPR2 gene: a novel component involved in cisplatin- and doxorubicin-provoked cell kill

The therapeutic potential of antitumor drugs is seriously limited by the manifestation of cellular drug resistance. We used the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model system to identify novel mechanisms of resistance to one of the most active anticancer agents, cisplatin. We pinpointed NPR2 (nitrogen permease regulator 2) as a gene whose disruption conferred resistance to cisplatin. In addition, we observed a 4-fold cross-resistance of yeast npr2Delta cells (i.e., cells from which the NPR2 gene had been disrupted) to the anticancer drug doxorubicin, in combination with hypersensitivity to cadmium chloride. Furthermore, npr2Delta cells displayed unaltered cellular cisplatin and doxorubicin accumulation and showed an enhanced rate of spontaneous mutation compared with the isogenic parent. These data indicate that the npr2Delta phenotype overlaps that of the sky1Delta cells that we characterized previously (Mol Pharmacol 61:659-666, 2002). Therefore, we generated yeast npr2Delta sky1Delta double-knockout cells and performed clonogenic survival assays for cisplatin and doxorubicin, which revealed that NPR2 and SKY1 (SR-protein-specific kinase from budding yeast) are epistatic. The double-knockout strain was just as resistant to cisplatin and doxorubicin as the single-knockout strain that was most resistant to either drug. In conclusion, we identified NPR2 as a novel component involved in cell kill provoked by cisplatin and doxorubicin, and our data support the hypothesis that NPR2 and SKY1 may use mutual regulatory routes to mediate the cytotoxicity of these anticancer drugs.

Repair of damaged and mismatched DNA by the XPC homologues Rhp41 and Rhp42 of fission yeast

Rhp41 and Rhp42 of Schizosaccharomyces pombe are homologues of human XPC, which is involved in nucleotide excision repair (NER) of damaged DNA. Inactivation of rhp41 caused moderate sensitivity to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. In addition, an increase of mitotic mutation rates was observed in the rhp41 mutant, which was dependent on active translesion polymerase Z. UV sensitivity and mutation rates were not different between rhp42 and wild type, but compared to rhp41 were further increased in rhp41 rhp42 cells. Transcription of the fbp1 gene (induced in vegetative cells) and of the SPBC1289.14 gene (induced during meiosis) was strongly blocked by UV-induced damages in the rhp41 mutant, but not, or only slightly, reduced in rhp42 background. NER-dependent short-patch repair of mismatches formed during meiosis was slightly affected in rhp41, moderately affected in rhp42, and absent in rhp41 rhp42. Epistasis analysis with rhp7 and rhp26 indicates that Rhp41 and Rhp42 are both involved in the global genome and transcription-coupled repair subpathways of NER. Rhp41 plays a major role in damage repair and Rhp42 in mismatch repair.

Repair of active and silenced rDNA in yeast: the contributions of photolyase and transcription-couples nucleotide excision repair

DNA repair by photolyase (photoreactivation) and nucleotide excision repair (NER) are the major pathways to remove UV-induced cyclobutane-pyrimidine dimers (CPDs). The nucleolus is a nuclear subcompartment containing the ribosomal RNA genes (rDNA) of which a fraction is transcribed by RNA polymerase I (RNAP-I), and the rest is silenced. Here yeast was used to investigate how photoreactivation and NER contribute to repair of active and inactive rDNA. Cells were irradiated with UV light and exposed to different repair conditions. Nuclei were isolated, and the active genes were separated from the inactive genes by restriction endonuclease digestion. CPDs were measured in total rDNA, in both fractions, and in the GAL10 gene. Repair in rDNA was as efficient as in GAL10 indicating that both pathways have unrestricted access to the nucleolus. Photoreactivation was much faster than NER and therefore was the predominant repair pathway. Active genes were faster repaired by photolyase than were silenced genes providing evidence for an open chromatin structure during repair. The transcribed strands of active genes, but not of inactive genes, were slightly faster repaired by NER providing evidence for transcription-coupled repair by RNAP-I. There was no pronounced inhibition of photoreactivation by RNAP-I in the transcribed strand, which is in contrast to genes transcribed by RNAP-II and suggests different stabilities of RNAP-I and RNAP-II stalled at CPDs.

Inactivation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SKY1 gene induces a specific modification of the yeast anticancer drug sensitivity profile accompanied by a mutator phenotype

The therapeutic potential of the highly active anticancer agent cisplatin is severely limited by the occurrence of cellular resistance. A better understanding of the molecular pathways involved in cisplatin-induced cell death could potentially indicate ways to overcome cellular unresponsiveness to the drug and thus lead to better treatment results. We used the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model organism to identify and characterize novel genes involved in cisplatin-induced cell kill, and found that SKY1 (SR-protein-specific kinase from budding yeast) is a cisplatin sensitivity gene whose disruption conferred cisplatin resistance. In cross-resistance studies, we observed resistance of yeast sky1 Delta cells (i.e., cells from which the SKY1 gene had been disrupted) to cisplatin, carboplatin (but not oxaliplatin), doxorubicin and daunorubicin, and hypersensitivity to cadmium chloride and 5-fluorouracil. Furthermore, these cells did not display reduced platinum accumulation, DNA platination or doxorubicin accumulation, indicating that the resistance is unrelated to decreased drug import or increased drug export. Based on the modification of the anticancer drug sensitivity profile and our finding that sky1 Delta cells display a mutator phenotype, we propose that Sky1p might play a significant role in specific repair and/or tolerance pathways. Disruption of the S. cerevisiae SKY1 gene would thus result in deregulation of such mechanisms and, consequently, lead to altered drug sensitivity.

Transcription-coupled repair in RNA polymerase I-transcribed genes of yeast

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) of UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) was measured in the individual strands of transcriptionally active and inactive ribosomal genes of yeast. Ribosomal genes (rDNA) are present in multiple copies, but only a fraction of them is actively transcribed. Restriction enzyme digestion was used to specifically release the transcriptionally active fraction from yeast nuclei, and selective psoralen crosslinking was used to distinguish between active and inactive rDNA chromatin. Removal of CPDs was followed in both rDNA populations, and the data clearly show that strand-specific repair occurs in transcriptionally active rDNA while being absent in the inactive rDNA fraction. Thus, transcription-coupled repair occurs in RNA polymerase I-transcribed genes in yeast. Moreover, the nontranscribed strand of active rDNA is repaired faster than either strand of inactive rDNA, implying that NER has preferred access to the active, non-nucleosomal rDNA chromatin. Finally, restriction enzyme accessibility to active rDNA varies during NER, suggesting that there is a change in ribosomal gene chromatin structure during or soon after CPD removal.

Mechanisms of transcription-coupled DNA repair

Several types of helix-distorting DNA lesions block the passage of elongating RNA polymerase II. Surprisingly, such transcription-blocking lesions are usually repaired considerably faster than non-obstructive lesions in the non-transcribed strand or in the genome overall. In this review, our knowledge of eukaryotic transcription-coupled repair (TCR) will be considered from the point of view of transcription, and current models for the mechanism of TCR will be discussed.

A genome-wide screening in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for genes that confer resistance to the anticancer agent cisplatin

Cisplatin is a potent DNA-damaging agent that has demonstrated anticancer activities against several tumors. However, manifestation of cellular resistance is a major obstacle in anticancer therapy that severely limits the curative potential of cisplatin. Therefore, understanding the molecular basis of cisplatin resistance could significantly improve the clinical efficacy of this anticancer agent. Here, we employed Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model organism to study cisplatin resistance mechanisms and describe a one-step cisplatin selection to identify and characterize novel cisplatin resistance genes. Screening a multicopy yeast genomic library enabled us to isolate several yeast clones for which we could confirm that the cisplatin resistance phenotype was linked to the introduced fragment. In a first attempt, a number of open reading frames could be identified. Among these genes, PDE2 and ZDS2 were repeatedly identified as genes whose overexpression confers cellular resistance to cisplatin. PDE2, encoding cAMP-phosphodiesterase 2, is of particular interest because the overexpression of this yeast gene is known to induce cisplatin resistance in mammalian cells as well, providing proof of the principle of our experimental approach. In addition, the identification of PDE2 shows that our yeast screening system can directly be informative for drug resistance in mammalian cells.

Transcription dependence and the roles of two excision repair pathways for UV damage in fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Fission yeasts Schizosaccharomyces pombe possess two types of excision repair systems for UV-induced DNA damage, nucleotide excision repair (NER) and UV-damaged DNA endonuclease (UVDE)-dependent excision repair (UVER). Despite its high efficiency in damage removal, UVER defects have less effect on UV survival than NER defects. To understand the differential roles of two pathways, we examined strand-specific damage removal at the myo2 and rpb2 loci. Although NER removes cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers from the transcribed strand more rapidly than from the nontranscribed strand, UVER repairs cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers equally on both strands and at a much higher rate than NER. The low rate of damage removal from the nontranscribed strand in the absence of UVER indicates inefficient global genome repair (GGR) in this organism and a possible function of UVER as an alternative to GGR. Disruption of rhp26, the S. pombe homolog of CSB/RAD26, eliminated the strand bias of NER almost completely and resulted in a significant increase of UV sensitivity of cells in a uvdeDelta background. We suggest that the combination of transcription-coupled repair of NER and rapid UVER contributes to UV survival in growing S. pombe cells, which is accomplished by transcription-coupled repair and GGR in other organisms.

Human transcription release factor 2 dissociates RNA polymerases I and II stalled at a cyclobutane thymine dimer

RNA polymerase II stalled at a lesion in the transcribed strand is thought to constitute a signal for transcription-coupled repair. Transcription factors that act on RNA polymerase in elongation mode potentially influence this mode of repair. Previously, it was shown that transcription elongation factors TFIIS and Cockayne's syndrome complementation group B protein did not disrupt the ternary complex of RNA polymerase II stalled at a thymine cyclobutane dimer, nor did they enable RNA polymerase II to bypass the dimer. Here we investigated the effect of the transcription factor 2 on RNA polymerase II and RNA polymerase I stalled at thymine dimers. Transcription factor 2 is known to release transcripts from RNA polymerase II early elongation complex generated by pulse-transcription. We found that factor 2 (which is also called release factor) disrupts the ternary complex of RNA polymerase II at a thymine dimer and surprisingly exerts the same effect on RNA polymerase I. These findings show that in mammalian cells a RNA polymerase I or RNA polymerase II transcript truncated by a lesion in the template strand may be discarded unless repair is accomplished rapidly by a mechanism that does not displace stalled RNA polymerases.

Tight correlation between inhibition of DNA repair in vitro and transcription factor IIIA binding in a 5S ribosomal RNA gene

UV-induced photoproducts (cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers, CPDs) in DNA are removed by nucleotide excision repair (NER), and the presence of transcription factors on DNA can restrict the accessibility of NER enzymes. We have investigatigated the modulation of NER in a gene promoter using the Xenopus transcription factor IIIA (TFIIIA)-5S rDNA complex and Xenopus oocyte nuclear extracts. TFIIIA alters CPD formation primarily in the transcribed strand of the 50 bp internal control region (ICR) of 5S rDNA. During NER in vitro, CPD removal is reduced at most sites in both strands of the ICR when TFIIIA is bound. Efficient repair occurs just outside the TFIIIA-binding site (within 10 bp), and in the absence of 5S rRNA transcription. Interestingly, three CPD sites within the ICR [+56, +75 (transcribed strand) and +73 (non-transcribed strand)] are repaired rapidly when TFIIIA is bound, while CPDs within approximately 5 bases of these sites are repaired much more slowly. CPDs at these three sites may partially displace TFIIIA, thereby enabling rapid repair. However, TFIIIA is not completely displaced during NER, at least at sites outside the ICR, even though the NER complex could be sterically hindered by TFIIIA. Such inefficient repair of transcription factor binding sites could increase mutation frequency in regulatory regions of genes.

Spontaneous mutation, oxidative DNA damage, and the roles of base and nucleotide excision repair in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The OGG1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a DNA glycosylase that excises 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-OxoG). When compared to wild-type, ogg1 mutants show an increase in the frequency of GC to TA transversions, indicating a role for Ogg1 in the repair of 8-OxoG. Here we report an increased frequency of forward mutation to canavanine resistance in mutants defective in the nucleotide excision repair (NER) gene RAD14. This was not increased further in strains additionally defective in OGG1. However, when compared to strains solely defective in OGG1, ogg1radl4 mutants displayed an increase in spontaneous GC to TA transversions. Intriguingly, reversion of the lys1-1 ochre allele was not increased in rad14 mutants, suggesting that oxidative base damage may only represent a substrate for NER in certain regions of the genome. We also examined repair of oxidative DNA damage by transforming mutant strains with plasmid DNA treated with methylene blue plus visible light. Mutants defective in OGG1 showed no significant reduction in transformation efficiency compared with wild-type strains. In contrast, disruption of RAD14 reduced the efficiency of transformation, yet there was no further decrease in an ogg1rad14 mutant. This strongly supports a role for NER in the repair of oxidative base damage in yeast, and differs from similar experiments carried out in E. coli, where transformation efficiency is only reduced in mutants defective in both fpg and uvrA. Finally, the repair of Fpg-sensitive sites was examined at the MATalpha and HMLalpha mating type loci, and NER was found to play a role in their removal.

Preferential binding of yeast Rad4.Rad23 complex to damaged DNA

The yeast Rad4 and Rad23 proteins form a complex that is involved in nucleotide excision repair (NER). Their function in this process is not known yet, but genetic data suggest that they act in an early step in NER. We have purified an epitope-tagged Rad4.Rad23 (tRad4. Rad23) complex from yeast cells, using a clone overproducing Rad4 with a hemagglutinin-tag at its C terminus. tRad4.Rad23 complex purified by both conventional and immuno-affinity chromatography complements the in vitro repair defect of rad4 and rad23 mutant extracts, demonstrating that these proteins are functional in NER. Using electrophoretic mobility shift assays, we show preferential binding of the tRad4.Rad23 complex to damaged DNA in vitro. UV-irradiated, as well as N-acetoxy-2-(acetylamino)fluorene-treated DNA, is efficiently bound by the protein complex. These data suggest that Rad4.Rad23 interacts with DNA damage during NER and may play a role in recognition of the damage.

Cockayne syndrome: defective repair of transcription?

In the past years, it has become increasingly evident that basal metabolic processes within the cell are intimately linked and influenced by one another. One such link that recently has attracted much attention is the close interplay between nucleotide excision DNA repair and transcription. This is illustrated both by the preferential repair of the transcribed strand of active genes (a phenomenon known as transcription-coupled repair, TCR) as well as by the distinct dual involvement of proteins in both processes. The mechanism of TCR in eukaryotes is still largely unknown. It was first discovered in mammals by the pioneering studies of Hanawalt and colleagues, and subsequently identified in yeast and Escherichia coli. In the latter case, one protein, the transcription repair-coupling factor, was found to accomplish this function in vitro, and a plausible model for its activity was proposed. While the E. coli model still functions as a paradigm for TCR in eukaryotes, recent observations prompt us to believe that the situation in eukaryotes is much more complex, involving dual functionality of multiple proteins.

Lack of gene- and strand-specific DNA repair in RNA polymerase III-transcribed human tRNA genes

UV light induces DNA lesions which are removed by nucleotide excision repair. Genes transcribed by RNA polymerase II are repaired faster than the flanking chromatin, and the transcribed strand is repaired faster than the coding strand. Transcription-coupled repair is not seen in RNA polymerase I-transcribed human rRNA genes. Since repair of genes transcribed by RNA polymerase III has not been analyzed before, we investigated DNA repair of tRNA genes after irradiation of human fibroblasts with UVC. We studied the repair of UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers at nucleotide resolution by ligation-mediated PCR. A single-copy gene encoding selenocysteine tRNA, a tRNA valine gene, and their flanking sequences were analyzed. Protein-DNA footprinting showed that both genes were occupied by regulatory factors in vivo, and Northern blotting and nuclear run-on analysis of the tRNA indicated that these genes were actively transcribed. We found that both genes were repaired slower than RNA polymerase II-transcribed genes. No major difference between repair of the transcribed and the coding DNA strands was detected. Transcribed sequences of the tRNA genes were not repaired faster than flanking sequences. Indeed, several sequence positions in the 5' flanking region of the tRNA(Val) gene were repaired more efficiently than the gene itself. These results indicate that unlike RNA polymerase II, RNA polymerase III has no stimulatory effect on DNA repair. Since tRNA genes are covered by the regulatory factor TFIIIC and RNA polymerase III, these proteins may actually inhibit the DNA's accessibility to repair enzymes.

Overproduction, purification, and characterization of the XPC subunit of the human DNA repair excision nuclease

Xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C gene (XPC) encodes a protein of 125 kDa which is present in a tight complex with a 58-kDa protein encoded by the human homolog of the yeast RAD23 gene, HHR23B (Masutani, C., Sugasawa, K., Yanagisawa, J., Sonoyama, T., Ui, M., Enomoto, T., Takio, K., Tanaka, K., van der Spek, P. J., Bootsma, D., Hoeijmakers, J. H. J., and Hanaoka, F.(1994) EMBO J. 13, 1831-1843). The XPC-HHR23B complex is required for excision of thymine dimers from DNA in a human excision nuclease system reconstituted from purified proteins. In order to understand the role of the XPC-HHR23B complex in excision repair, we have overexpressed each subunit alone and the heterodimer in heterologous systems, purified them, and characterized their biochemical properties. We find that both XPC and the heterodimer bind DNA with high affinity and UV-damaged DNA with slightly higher preference. Surprisingly, we find that the XPC subunit alone is sufficient for reconstitution of the human excision nuclease and that the HHR23B subunit has no detectable effect on the excision activity of the reconstituted system.