Nicking is asynchronous and stimulated by synapsis in 12/23 rule-regulated V(D)J cleavage

RAG1/2 induces genomic insertions by mobilizing DNA into RAG1/2-independent breaks

Rommel et al. reveal a novel RAG1/2-mediated insertion pathway, which has the potential to destabilize the lymphocyte genome and shares features with DNA insertions observed in human cancer.

The RAG recombinase (RAG1/2) plays an essential role in adaptive immunity by mediating V(D)J recombination in developing lymphocytes. In contrast, aberrant RAG1/2 activity promotes lymphocyte malignancies by causing chromosomal translocations and DNA deletions at cancer genes. RAG1/2 can also induce genomic DNA insertions by transposition and trans-V(D)J recombination, but only few such putative events have been documented in vivo. We used next-generation sequencing techniques to examine chromosomal rearrangements in primary murine B cells and discovered that RAG1/2 causes aberrant insertions by releasing cleaved antibody gene fragments that subsequently reintegrate into DNA breaks induced on a heterologous chromosome. We confirmed that RAG1/2 also mobilizes genomic DNA into independent physiological breaks by identifying similar insertions in human lymphoma and leukemia. Our findings reveal a novel RAG1/2-mediated insertion pathway distinct from DNA transposition and trans-V(D)J recombination that destabilizes the genome and shares features with reported oncogenic DNA insertions.

Synapsis alters RAG-mediated nicking at Tcrb recombination signal sequences: implications for the “beyond 12/23” rule

At the Tcrb locus, Vβ-to-Jβ rearrangement is permitted by the 12/23 rule but is not observed in vivo, a restriction termed the “beyond 12/23” rule (B12/23 rule). Previous work showed that Vβ recombination signal sequences (RSSs) do not recombine with Jβ RSSs because Jβ RSSs are crippled for either nicking or synapsis. This result raised the following question: how can crippled Jβ RSSs recombine with Dβ RSSs? We report here that the nicking of some Jβ RSSs can be substantially stimulated by synapsis with a 3′Dβ1 partner RSS. This result helps to reconcile disagreement in the field regarding the impact of synapsis on nicking. Furthermore, our data allow for the classification of Tcrb RSSs into two major categories: those that nick quickly and those that nick slowly in the absence of a partner. Slow-nicking RSSs can be stimulated to nick more efficiently upon synapsis with an appropriate B12/23 partner, and our data unexpectedly suggest that fast-nicking RSSs can be inhibited for nicking upon synapsis with an inappropriate partner. These observations indicate that the RAG proteins exert fine control over every step of V(D)J cleavage and support the hypothesis that initial RAG binding can occur on RSSs with either 12- or 23-bp spacers (12- or 23-RSSs, respectively).

Differential reaction kinetics, cleavage complex formation, and nonamer binding domain dependence dictate the structure-specific and sequence-specific nuclease activity of RAGs

During V(D)J recombination, RAG (recombination-activating gene) complex cleaves DNA based on sequence specificity. Besides its physiological function, RAG has been shown to act as a structure-specific nuclease. Recently, we showed that the presence of cytosine within the single-stranded region of heteroduplex DNA is important when RAGs cleave on DNA structures. In the present study, we report that heteroduplex DNA containing a bubble region can be cleaved efficiently when present along with a recombination signal sequence (RSS) in cis or trans configuration. The sequence of the bubble region influences RAG cleavage at RSS when present in cis. We also find that the kinetics of RAG cleavage differs between RSS and bubble, wherein RSS cleavage reaches maximum efficiency faster than bubble cleavage. In addition, unlike RSS, RAG cleavage at bubbles does not lead to cleavage complex formation. Finally, we show that the "nonamer binding region," which regulates RAG cleavage on RSS, is not important during RAG activity in non-B DNA structures. Therefore, in the current study, we identify the possible mechanism by which RAG cleavage is regulated when it acts as a structure-specific nuclease.

V(D)J recombination: mechanisms of initiation

V(D)J recombination assembles immunoglobulin and T cell receptor genes during lymphocyte development through a series of carefully orchestrated DNA breakage and rejoining events. DNA cleavage requires a series of protein-DNA complexes containing the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins and recombination signals that flank the recombining gene segments. In this review, we discuss recent advances in our understanding of the function and domain organization of the RAG proteins, the composition and structure of RAG-DNA complexes, and the pathways that lead to the formation of these complexes. We also consider the functional significance of RAG-mediated histone recognition and ubiquitin ligase activities, and the role played by RAG in ensuring proper repair of DNA breaks made during V(D)J recombination. Finally, we propose a model for the formation of RAG-DNA complexes that involves anchoring of RAG1 at the recombination signal nonamer and RAG2-dependent surveillance of adjoining DNA for suitable spacer and heptamer sequences.

Elucidating the domain architecture and functions of non-core RAG1: the capacity of a non-core zinc-binding domain to function in nuclear import and nucleic acid binding

Background

The repertoire of the antigen-binding receptors originates from the rearrangement of immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor genetic loci in a process known as V(D)J recombination. The initial site-specific DNA cleavage steps of this process are catalyzed by the lymphoid specific proteins RAG1 and RAG2. The majority of studies on RAG1 and RAG2 have focused on the minimal, core regions required for catalytic activity. Though not absolutely required, non-core regions of RAG1 and RAG2 have been shown to influence the efficiency and fidelity of the recombination reaction.

Results

Using a partial proteolysis approach in combination with bioinformatics analyses, we identified the domain boundaries of a structural domain that is present in the 380-residue N-terminal non-core region of RAG1. We term this domain the Central Non-core Domain (CND; residues 87-217).

Conclusions

We show how the CND alone, and in combination with other regions of non-core RAG1, functions in nuclear localization, zinc coordination, and interactions with nucleic acid. Together, these results demonstrate the multiple roles that the non-core region can play in the function of the full length protein.

A zinc site in the C-terminal domain of RAG1 is essential for DNA cleavage activity

The recombination-activating protein, RAG1, a key component of the V(D)J recombinase, binds multiple Zn(2+) ions in its catalytically required core region. However, the role of zinc in the DNA cleavage activity of RAG1 is not well resolved. To address this issue, we determined the stoichiometry of Zn(2+) ions bound to the catalytically active core region of RAG1 under various conditions. Using metal quantitation methods, we determined that core RAG1 can bind up to four Zn(2+) ions. Stripping the full complement of bound Zn(2+) ions to produce apoprotein abrogated DNA cleavage activity. Moreover, even partial removal of zinc-binding equivalents resulted in a significant diminishment of DNA cleavage activity, as compared to holo-Zn(2+) core RAG1. Mutants of the intact core RAG1 and the isolated core RAG1 domains were studied to identify the location of zinc-binding sites. Significantly, the C-terminal domain in core RAG1 binds at least two Zn(2+) ions, with one zinc-binding site containing C902 and C907 as ligands (termed the CC zinc site) and H937 and H942 coordinating a Zn(2+) ion in a separate site (HH zinc site). The latter zinc-binding site is essential for DNA cleavage activity, given that the H937A and H942A mutants were defective in both in vitro DNA cleavage assays and cellular recombination assays. Furthermore, as mutation of the active-site residue E962 reduces Zn(2+) coordination, we propose that the HH zinc site is located in close proximity to the DDE active site. Overall, these results demonstrate that Zn(2+) serves an important auxiliary role for RAG1 DNA cleavage activity. Furthermore, we propose that one of the zinc-binding sites is linked to the active site of core RAG1 directly or indirectly by E962.

Structure of the RAG1 nonamer binding domain with DNA reveals a dimer that mediates DNA synapsis

The products of recombination-activating genes RAG1 and RAG2 mediate the assembly of antigen receptor genes during lymphocyte development in a process known as V(D)J recombination. Lack of structural information for the RAG proteins has hindered mechanistic studies of this reaction. We report here the crystal structure of an essential DNA binding domain of the RAG1 catalytic core bound to its nonamer DNA recognition motif. The RAG1 nonamer binding domain (NBD) forms a tightly interwoven dimer that binds and synapses two nonamer elements, with each NBD making contact with both DNA molecules. Biochemical and biophysical experiments confirm that the two nonamers are in close proximity in the RAG1/2-DNA synaptic complex and demonstrate the functional importance of the protein-DNA contacts revealed in the structure. These findings reveal a previously unsuspected function for the NBD in DNA synapsis and have implications for the regulation of DNA binding and cleavage by RAG1 and RAG2.

A non-sequence-specific DNA binding mode of RAG1 is inhibited by RAG2

RAG1 and RAG2 proteins catalyze site-specific DNA cleavage reactions in V(D)J recombination, a process that assembles antigen receptor genes from component gene segments during lymphocyte development. The first step towards the DNA cleavage reaction is the sequence-specific association of the RAG proteins with the conserved recombination signal sequence (RSS), which flanks each gene segment in the antigen receptor loci. Questions remain as to the contribution of each RAG protein to recognition of the RSS. For example, while RAG1 alone is capable of recognizing the conserved elements of the RSS, it is not clear if or how RAG2 may enhance sequence-specific associations with the RSS. To shed light on this issue, we examined the association of RAG1, with and without RAG2, with consensus RSS versus non-RSS substrates using fluorescence anisotropy and gel mobility shift assays. The results indicate that while RAG1 can recognize the RSS, the sequence-specific interaction under physiological conditions is masked by a high-affinity non-sequence-specific DNA binding mode. Significantly, addition of RAG2 effectively suppressed the association of RAG1 with non-sequence-specific DNA, resulting in a large differential in binding affinity for the RSS versus the non-RSS sites. We conclude that this represents a major means by which RAG2 contributes to the initial recognition of the RSS and that, therefore, association of RAG1 with RAG2 is required for effective interactions with the RSS in developing lymphocytes.

Full-length RAG1 promotes contact with coding and intersignal sequences in RAG protein complexes bound to recombination signals paired in cis

The RAG proteins initiate V(D)J recombination by mediating synapsis and cleavage of two different antigen receptor gene segments through interactions with their flanking recombination signal sequences (RSS). The protein-DNA complexes that support this process have mainly been studied using RAG-RSS complexes assembled using oligonucleotide substrates containing a single RSS that are paired in trans to promote synapsis. How closely these complexes model those formed on longer, more physiologically relevant substrates containing RSSs on the same DNA molecule (in cis) remains unclear. To address this issue, we characterized discrete core and full-length RAG protein complexes bound to RSSs paired in cis. We find these complexes support cleavage activity regulated by V(D)J recombination's '12/23 rule' and exhibit plasticity in RSS usage dependent on partner RSS composition. DNA footprinting studies suggest that the RAG proteins in these complexes mediate more extensive contact with sequences flanking the RSS than previously observed, some of which are enhanced by full-length RAG1, and associated with synapsis and efficient RSS cleavage. Finally, we demonstrate that the RAG1 C-terminus facilitates hairpin formation on long DNA substrates, and full-length RAG1 promotes hairpin retention in the post-cleavage RAG complex. These results provide new insights into the mechanism of physiological V(D)J recombination.

Early steps of V(D)J rearrangement: insights from biochemical studies of RAG-RSS complexes

V(D)J recombination is initiated by the synapsis and cleavage of a complementary (12/23) pair of recombination signal sequences (RSSs) by the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins. Our understanding of these processes has been greatly aided by the development of in vitro biochemical assays of RAG binding and cleavage activity. Accumulating evidence suggests that synaptic complex assembly occurs in a step-wise manner and that the RAG proteins catalyze RSS cleavage by mechanisms similar to those used by bacterial transposases. In this chapter we will review the molecular mechanisms of RAG synaptic complex assembly and 12/23-regulated RSS cleavage, focusing on recent advances that shed new light on these processes.

Quantitative analyses of RAG-RSS interactions and conformations revealed by atomic force microscopy

During V(D)J recombination, site specific DNA excision is dictated by the binding of RAG1/2 proteins to the conserved recombination signal sequence (RSS) within the genome. The interaction between RAG1/2 and RSS is thought to involve a large DNA distortion that is permissive for DNA cleavage. In this study, using atomic force microscopy imaging (AFM), we analyzed individual RAG-RSS complexes, in which the bending angle of RAG-associated RSS substrates could be visualized and quantified. We provided the quantitative measurement on the conformations of specific RAG-12RSS complexes. Previous data indicating the necessity of RAG2 for recombination implies a structural role in the RAG-RSS complex. Surprisingly, however, no significant difference was observed in conformational bending with AFM between RAG1-12RSS and RAG1/2-12RSS. RAG1 was found sufficient to induce DNA bending, and the addition of RAG2 did not change the bending profile. In addition, a prenicked 12RSS bound by RAG1/2 proteins displayed a conformation similar to the one observed with the intact 12RSS, implying that no greater DNA bending occurs after the nicking step in the signal complex. Taken together, the quantitative AFM results on the components of the recombinase emphasize a tightly held complex with a bend angle value near 60 degrees , which may be a prerequisite step for the site-specific nicking by the V(D)J recombinase.

Thermal dependency of RAG1 self-association properties

Background

Functional immunoglobulin and T cell receptor genes are produced in developing lymphocytes by V(D)J recombination. The initial site-specific DNA cleavage steps in this process are catalyzed by the V(D)J recombinase, consisting of RAG1 and RAG2, which is directed to appropriate DNA cleavage sites by recognition of the conserved recombination signal sequence (RSS). RAG1 contains both the active site and the RSS binding domains, although RAG2 is also required for DNA cleavage activity. An understanding of the physicochemical properties of the RAG proteins, their association, and their interaction with the RSS is not yet well developed.

Results

Here, we further our investigations into the self-association properties of RAG1 by demonstrating that despite the presence of multiple RAG1 oligomers, only the dimeric form maintains the ability to interact with RAG2 and the RSS. However, facile aggregation of the dimeric form at physiological temperature may render this protein inactive in the absence of RAG2. Upon addition of RAG2 at 37°C, the preferentially stabilized V(D)J recombinase:RSS complex contains a single dimer of RAG1.

Conclusion

Together these results confirm that the functional form of RAG1 in V(D)J recombination is in the dimeric state, and that its stability under physiological conditions likely requires complex formation with RAG2. Additionally, in future structural and functional studies of RAG1, it will be important to take into account the temperature-dependent self-association properties of RAG1 described in this study.

RAG-heptamer interaction in the synaptic complex is a crucial biochemical checkpoint for the 12/23 recombination rule

In V(D)J recombination, the RAG1 and RAG2 protein complex cleaves the recombination signal sequences (RSSs), generating a hairpin structure at the coding end. The cleavage occurs only between two RSSs with different spacer lengths of 12 and 23 bp. Here we report that in the synaptic complex, recombination-activating gene (RAG) proteins interact with the 7-mer and unstack the adjacent base in the coding region. We generated a RAG1 mutant that exhibits reduced RAG-7-mer interaction, unstacking of the coding base, and hairpin formation. Mutation of the 23-RSS at the first position of the 7-mer, which has been reported to impair the cleavage of the partner 12-RSS, demonstrated phenotypes similar to those of the RAG1 mutant; the RAG interaction and base unstacking in the partner 12-RSS are reduced. We propose that the RAG-7-mer interaction is a critical step for coding DNA distortion and hairpin formation in the context of the 12/23 rule.

DNA cleavage of a cryptic recombination signal sequence by RAG1 and RAG2. Implications for partial V(H) gene replacement

Antibody and T cell receptor genes are assembled from gene segments by V(D)J recombination to produce an almost infinitely diverse repertoire of antigen specificities. Recombination is initiated by cleavage of conserved recombination signal sequences (RSS) by RAG1 and RAG2 during lymphocyte development. Recent evidence demonstrates that recombination can occur at noncanonical RSS sites within Ig genes or at other loci, outside the context of normal lymphocyte receptor gene rearrangement. We have characterized the ability of the RAG proteins to bind and cleave a cryptic RSS (cRSS) located within an Ig V(H) gene segment. The RAG proteins bound with sequence specificity to either the consensus RSS or the cRSS. The RAG proteins nick the cRSS on both the top and bottom strands, thereby bypassing the formation of the DNA hairpin intermediate observed in RAG cleavage of canonical RSS substrates. We propose that the RAG proteins may utilize an alternative mechanism for double-stranded DNA cleavage, depending on the substrate sequence. These results have implications for further diversification of the antigen receptor repertoire as well as the role of the RAG proteins in genomic instability.

The bounty of RAGs: recombination signal complexes and reaction outcomes

V(D)J recombination is a form of site-specific DNA rearrangement through which antigen receptor genes are assembled. This process involves the breakage and reunion of DNA mediated by two lymphoid cell-specific proteins, recombination activating genes RAG-1 and RAG-2, and ubiquitously expressed architectural DNA-binding proteins and DNA-repair factors. Here I review the progress toward understanding the composition, assembly, organization, and activity of the protein-DNA complexes that support the initiation of V(D)J recombination, as well as the molecular basis for the sequence-specific recognition of recombination signal sequences (RSSs) that are the targets of the RAG proteins. Parallels are drawn between V(D)J recombination and Tn5/Tn10 transposition with respect to the reactions, the proteins, and the protein-DNA complexes involved in these processes. I also consider the relative roles of the different sequence elements within the RSS in recognition, cleavage, and post-cleavage events. Finally, I discuss alternative DNA transactions mediated by the V(D)J recombinase, the protein-DNA complexes that support them, and factors and forces that control them.

New concepts in the regulation of an ancient reaction: transposition by RAG1/RAG2

The lymphoid-specific factors, recombination-activating gene 1 (RAG1) and RAG2, initiate V(D)J recombination by introducing DNA double-stand breaks at specific sites in the genome. In addition to this critical endonuclease activity, the RAG proteins catalyze other chemical reactions that can affect the outcome of V(D)J recombination, one of which is transposition. While the transposition activity of the RAG proteins is thought to have been critical for the evolution of modern antigen-receptor loci, it has also been proposed to contribute to chromosomal translocations and lymphoid malignancy. A major challenge has been to determine how the transposition activity of the RAG proteins is regulated in vivo. Although a variety of mechanisms have been suggested by recent studies, a clear resolution of this issue remains elusive.

Putting the pieces together: identification and characterization of structural domains in the V(D)J recombination protein RAG1

V(D)J recombination generates functional immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor genes in developing lymphocytes. The recombination-activating gene 1 (RAG1) and RAG2 proteins catalyze site-specific DNA cleavage in this recombination process. Biochemical studies have identified catalytically active regions of each protein, referred to as the core regions. Here, we review our progress in the identification and characterization, in biophysical and biochemical terms, of topologically independent domains within both the non-core and core regions of RAG1. Previous characterizations of a structural domain identified in the non-core region of RAG1 from residues 265-380, referred to as the zinc-binding dimerization domain, are discussed. This domain contains two zinc-binding motifs, a RING finger and a C2H2 zinc finger. Core RAG1 also consists of multiple domains, each of which functions individually in one or more of the essential macromolecular interactions formed by the intact core protein. Two structural domains referred to as the central and the C-terminal domains that include residues 528-760 and 761-979 of RAG1, respectively, have been identified. The interactions of the central and C-terminal domains in core RAG1 with the recombination signal sequence (RSS) have contributed additional insight to a developing model for the RAG1-RSS complex.

Kinetic analysis of the nicking and hairpin formation steps in V(D)J recombination

The complete cleavage phase of V(D)J recombination includes four phases: binding of the active RAG complexes to the 12- or 23-signals, nicking of the signals, synapsis of the two signals, and hairpin formation at both signals concurrently. We have done time courses for the complete cleavage phase of the V(D)J recombination reaction and quantitated the amount of active RAG enzyme. We have also formulated a kinetic model for the binding, nicking, synapsis, and hairpin formation phases. We have utilized free solution enzymatic measurements for the binding and nicking phases as we do mathematical simulations of the kinetic model. This permits iteration of rate constants for the synapsis and hairpin formation phases until the model fits the observed overall cleavage time course. This process yields a rate constant for the hairpin formation that is 0.004 min(-1), which corresponds to an average catalytic cycle time of 250 min. This value is exceedingly close to a measured value of this constant that relied on wash-out of an inhibitory cofactor. The agreement indicates that this is likely to be the rate of the hairpin step over a wide range of range of conditions and irrespective of the DNA sequence of the V, D or J coding end located adjacent to the signal. These findings indicate that, under optimal in vitro conditions, the core RAG proteins carry out nicking at a rate which is nearly 150-fold faster than hairpin formation. The physiologic implications of this and other kinetic inferences of these time courses are discussed.

DNA cleavage activity of the V(D)J recombination protein RAG1 is autoregulated

RAG1 and RAG2 catalyze the first DNA cleavage steps in V(D)J recombination. We demonstrate that the isolated central domain of RAG1 has inherent single-stranded (ss) DNA cleavage activity, which does not require, but is enhanced by, RAG2. The central domain, therefore, contains the active-site residues necessary to perform hydrolysis of the DNA phosphodiester backbone. Furthermore, the catalytic activity of this domain on ss DNA is abolished by addition of the C-terminal domain of RAG1. The inhibitory effects of this latter domain are suppressed on substrates containing double-stranded (ds) DNA. Together, the activities of the reconstituted domains on ss versus mixed ds-ss DNA approximate the activity of intact RAG1 in the presence of RAG2. We propose how the combined actions of the RAG1 domains may function in V(D)J recombination and also in aberrant cleavage reactions that may lead to genomic instability in B and T lymphocytes.

Joining mutants of RAG1 and RAG2 that demonstrate impaired interactions with the coding-end DNA

In V(D)J joining of antigen receptor genes, two recombination signal sequences (RSSs), 12- and 23-RSSs, form a complex with the protein products of recombination activating genes, RAG1 and RAG2. DNaseI footprinting demonstrates that the interaction of RAG proteins with substrate RSS DNA is not just limited to the signal region but involves the coding sequence as well. Joining mutants of RAG1 and RAG2 demonstrate impaired interactions with the coding region in both pre- and postcleavage type complexes. A possible role of this RAG coding region interaction is discussed in the context of V(D)J recombination.

Restraining the V(D)J recombinase

Chromosome breakage--a dangerous event that has triggered the evolution of several double-strand break repair pathways--has been co-opted by the immune system as an integral part of B- and T-cell development. This is a daring strategy, as improper repair can be deadly for the cell, if not for the whole organism. Even more daring, however, is the choice of a promiscuous transposase as the nuclease responsible for chromosome breakage, as the possibility of transposition brings an entirely new set of risks. What mechanisms constrain the dangerous potential of the recombinase and preserve genomic integrity during immune-system development?

Excision of the Drosophila mariner transposon Mos1. Comparison with bacterial transposition and V(D)J recombination

It has been proposed that the modern immune system has evolved from a transposon in an ancient vertebrate. While much is known about the mechanism by which bacterial transposable elements catalyze double-strand breaks at their ends, less is known about how eukaryotic transposable elements carry out these reactions. We have examined the mechanism by which mariner, a eukaryotic transposable element, performs DNA cleavage. We show that the nontransferred strand is cleaved initially, unlike prokaryotic transposons which cleave the transferred strand first. First strand cleavage is not tightly coupled to second strand cleavage and can occur independently of synapsis, as happens in V(D)J recombination but not in transposition of prokaryotic transposons. Unlike V(D)J recombination, however, second strand cleavage of mariner does not occur via a hairpin intermediate.

Ordered assembly of the V(D)J synaptic complex ensures accurate recombination

Recombination of gene segments at the immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor loci requires that the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins bring together DNA signal sequences (RSSs) with 12- and 23-bp spacers into a synaptic complex and cleave the DNA. A RAG1/2 multimer that can cleave both signals is shown to assemble on an isolated RSS, and the complementary RSS enters this complex as naked DNA. When RAG1/2 is allowed to bind 12 and 23 RSSs separately prior to their mixing, synaptic complex assembly and cleavage activity are greatly reduced, indicating that only a complex initially assembled on a single RSS leads to productive cleavage. RAG1/2 complexes assembled on 12 RSSs will only incorporate 23 partners, while complexes assembled on 23 RSSs show a 5- to 6-fold preference for 12 partners. Thus, initial assembly on a 12 RSS most accurately reflects the strict 12/23 coupled cleavage observed in the cell. Additional cellular factors such as chromatin may ensure that RAG1/2 first assembles on a 12 RSS, and then a free 23 RSS enters to activate cleavage.

The cleavage efficiency of the human immunoglobulin heavy chain VH elements by the RAG complex: implications for the immune repertoire

The human immunoglobulin heavy chain locus contains 39 functional human V(H) elements. All 39 V(H) elements (with their adjacent heptamer/nonamer signal) were tested for site-specific cleavage with purified human core RAG1 and RAG2, and HMG1 proteins in a 12/23-coupled cleavage reaction. Both nicking and hairpin formation were measured. The individual V(H) cleavage efficiencies vary over nearly a 30-fold range. These measurements will be useful in considering the factors affecting the generation of the immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor repertoires in the adult humans. Interestingly, when these cleavage efficiencies are summed for each of the V(H) families, the six V(H) family efficiencies correspond closely to the observed profile of unselected V(H) family usage in the peripheral B cells of normal adult humans. This correspondence raises the possibility that the dominant factor determining V(H) element utilization within the 1-megabase human genomic V(H) array is simply the individual RAG cleavage efficiencies.

RAG1 and RAG2 in V(D)J recombination and transposition

RAG1 and RAG2 are the key components of the V(D)J recombinase machinery that catalyses the somatic gene rearrangements of antigen receptor genes during lymphocyte development. In the first step of V(D)J recombination--DNA cleavage--the RAG proteins act together as an endonuclease to excise the DNA between two individual gene segments. They are also thought to be involved in the subsequent DNA joining step. In vitro, the RAG proteins catalyze the integration of the excised DNA element into target DNA completing a process similar to bacterial transposition. In vivo, this reaction is suppressed by an unknown mechanism. The individual roles of RAG1 and RAG2 in V(D)J recombination and transposition reactions are discussed based on mutation analyses and structure predictions.

Identification of two topologically independent domains in RAG1 and their role in macromolecular interactions relevant to V(D)J recombination

V(D)J recombination is instigated by the recombination-activating proteins RAG1 and RAG2, which catalyze site-specific DNA cleavage at the border of the recombination signal sequence (RSS). Although both proteins are required for activity, core RAG1 (the catalytically active region containing residues 384-1008 of 1040) alone displays binding specificity for the conserved heptamer and nonamer sequences of the RSS. The nonamer-binding region lies near the N terminus of core RAG1, whereas the heptamer-binding region has not been identified. Here, potential domains within core RAG1 were identified using limited proteolysis studies. An iterative procedure of DNA cloning, protein expression, and characterization revealed the presence of two topologically independent domains within core RAG1, referred to as the central domain (residues 528-760) and the C-terminal domain (residues 761-980). The domains do not include the nonamer-binding region but rather largely span the remaining relatively uncharacterized region of core RAG1. Characterization of macromolecular interactions revealed that the central domain bound to the RSS with specificity for the heptamer and contained the predominant binding site for RAG2. The C-terminal domain bound DNA cooperatively but did not show specificity for either conserved RSS element. This domain was also found to self-associate, implicating it as a dimerization domain within RAG1.

Asymmetric processing of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 cDNA in vivo: implications for functional end coupling during the chemical steps of DNA transposition

Retroviral integration, like all forms of DNA transposition, proceeds through a series of DNA cutting and joining reactions. During transposition, the 3' ends of linear transposon or donor DNA are joined to the 5' phosphates of a double-stranded cut in target DNA. Single-end transposition must be avoided in vivo because such aberrant DNA products would be unstable and the transposon would therefore risk being lost from the cell. To avoid suicidal single-end integration, transposons link the activity of their transposase protein to the combined functionalities of both donor DNA ends. Although previous work suggested that this critical coupling between transposase activity and DNA ends occurred before the initial hydrolysis step of retroviral integration, work in the related Tn10 and V(D)J recombination systems had shown that end coupling regulated transposase activity after the initial hydrolysis step of DNA transposition. Here, we show that integrase efficiently hydrolyzed just the wild-type end of two different single-end mutants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in vivo, which, in contrast to previous results, proves that two functional DNA ends are not required to activate integrase's initial hydrolysis activity. Furthermore, despite containing bound protein at their processed DNA ends, these mutant viruses did not efficiently integrate their singly cleaved wild-type end into target DNA in vitro. By comparing our results to those of related DNA recombination systems, we propose the universal model that end coupling regulates transposase activity after the first chemical step of DNA transposition.

The nicking step in V(D)J recombination is independent of synapsis: implications for the immune repertoire

In all of the transposition reactions that have been characterized thus far, synapsis of two transposon ends is required before any catalytic steps (strand nicking or strand transfer) occur. In V(D)J recombination, there have been inconclusive data concerning the role of synapsis in nicking. Synapsis between two 12-substrates or between two 23-substrates has not been ruled out in any studies thus far. Here we provide the first direct tests of this issue. We find that immobilization of signals does not affect their nicking, even though hairpinning is affected in a manner reflecting its known synaptic requirement. We also find that nicking is kinetically a unireactant enzyme-catalyzed reaction. Time courses are no different between nicking seen for a 12-substrate alone and a reaction involving both a 12- and a 23-substrate. Hence, synapsis is neither a requirement nor an effector of the rate of nicking. These results establish V(D)J recombination as the first example of a DNA transposition-type reaction in which catalytic steps begin prior to synapsis, and the results have direct implications for the order of the steps in V(D)J recombination, for the contribution of V(D)J recombination nicks to genomic instability, and for the diversification of the immune repertoire.

The RAG proteins and V(D)J recombination: complexes, ends, and transposition

V(D)J recombination proceeds through a series of protein:DNA complexes mediated in part by the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins. These proteins are responsible for sequence-specific DNA recognition and DNA cleavage, and they appear to perform multiple postcleavage roles in the reaction as well. Here we review the interaction of the RAG proteins with DNA, the chemistry of the cleavage reaction, and the higher order complexes in which these events take place. We also discuss postcleavage functions of the RAG proteins, including recent evidence indicating that they initiate the process of coding end processing by nicking hairpin DNA termini. Finally, we discuss the evolutionary and functional implications of the finding that RAG1 and RAG2 constitute a transposase, and we consider RAG protein biochemistry in the context of several bacterial transposition systems. This suggests a model of the RAG protein active site in which two divalent metal ions serve alternating and opposite roles as activators of attacking hydroxyl groups and stabilizers of oxyanion leaving groups.

Definition of minimal domains of interaction within the recombination-activating genes 1 and 2 recombinase complex

During V(D)J recombination, recognition and cleavage of the recombination signal sequences (RSSs) requires the coordinated action of the recombination-activating genes 1 and 2 (RAG1/RAG2) recombinase complex. In this report, we use deletion mapping and site-directed mutagenesis to determine the minimal domains critical for interaction between RAG1 and RAG2. We define the active core of RAG2 required for RSS cleavage as aa 1-371 and demonstrate that the C-terminal 57 aa of this core provide a dominant surface for RAG1 interaction. This region corresponds to the last of six predicted kelch repeat motifs that have been proposed by sequence analysis to fold RAG2 into a six-bladed beta-propeller structure. Residue W317 within this sixth repeat is shown to be critical for mediating contact with RAG1 and concurrently for stabilizing binding and directing cleavage of the RSS. We also show that zinc finger B (aa 727-750) of RAG1 provides a dominant interaction domain for recruiting RAG2. In all, the data support a model of RAG2 as a multimodular protein that utilizes one of its six faces for establishing productive contacts with RAG1.

Mechanistic basis for coding end sequence effects in the initiation of V(D)J recombination

V(D)J recombination is directed by recombination signal sequences. However, the flanking coding end sequence can markedly affect the frequency of the initiation of V(D)J recombination in vivo. Here we demonstrate that the coding end sequence effect can be qualitatively and quantitatively recapitulated in vitro with purified RAG proteins. We find that coding end sequence specifically affects the nicking step, which is the first biochemical step in RAG-mediated cleavage. The subsequent hairpin formation step is not affected by the coding end sequence. Furthermore, the coding end sequence effect can be ablated by prenicking the substrate, indicating that the coding end effect is specific to the nicking step. In reactions in which both 12- and 23-substrates are present, a suboptimal coding end sequence on one signal can slow down hairpin formation at the partner signal, a result consistent with models in which coordination between the signals occurs at the hairpin formation step. The coding end sequence effect on nicking and the coupling of the 12- and 23-substrates explains how hairpin formation can be rate limiting for some 12/23 pairs, whereas nicking can be rate limiting when low-efficiency coding end sequences are involved.

Transposition mediated by RAG1 and RAG2 and the evolution of the adaptive immune system

The RAG1 and RAG2 proteins together initiate V(D)J recombination by performing cleavage of chromosomal DNA adjacent to antigen receptor gene segments. Like the adaptive immune system itself, RAG1 and RAG2 are found only in jawed vertebrates. The hypothesis that RAG1 and RAG2 arose in evolution as components of a transposable element has received dramatic support from our recent finding that the RAG proteins are a fully functional transposase in vitro. This result strongly suggests that antigen receptor genes acquired their unusual structure as a consequence of the insertion of a transposable element into an ancestral receptor gene by RAG1 and RAG2 approx 450 million years ago.

Detection of RAG protein-V(D)J recombination signal interactions near the site of DNA cleavage by UV cross-linking

V(D)J recombination is initiated by double-strand cleavage at recombination signal sequences (RSSs). DNA cleavage is mediated by the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins. Recent experiments describing RAG protein-RSS complexes, while defining the interaction of RAG1 with the nonamer, have not assigned contacts immediately adjacent to the site of DNA cleavage to either RAG polypeptide. Here we use UV cross-linking to define sequence- and site-specific interactions between RAG1 protein and both the heptamer element of the RSS and the coding flank DNA. Hence, RAG1-DNA contacts span the site of cleavage. We also detect cross-linking of RAG2 protein to some of the same nucleotides that cross-link to RAG1, indicating that, in the binding complex, both RAG proteins are in close proximity to the site of cleavage. These results suggest how the heptamer element, the recognition surface essential for DNA cleavage, is recognized by the RAG proteins and have implications for the stoichiometry and active site organization of the RAG1-RAG2-RSS complex.

The RAG-HMG1 complex enforces the 12/23 rule of V(D)J recombination specifically at the double-hairpin formation step

A central unanswered question concerning the initial phases of V(D)J recombination has been at which step the 12/23 rule applies. This rule, which governs which variable (V), diversity (D), and joining (J) segments are able to pair during recombination, could operate at the level of signal sequence synapsis after RAG-HMG1 complex binding, signal nicking, or signal hairpin formation. It has also been unclear whether additional proteins are required to achieve adherence to the 12/23 rule. We developed a novel system for the detailed biochemical analysis of the 12/23 rule by using an oligonucleotide-based substrate that can include two signals. Under physiologic conditions, we found that the complex of RAG1, RAG2, and HMG1 can successfully recapitulate the 12/23 rule with the same specificity as that seen intracellularly and in crude extracts. The cleavage complex can bind and nick 12x12 and 23x23 substrates as well as 12x23 substrates. However, hairpin formation occurs at both of the signals only on 12x23 substrates. Moreover, under physiologic conditions, the presence of a partner 23-bp spacer suppresses single-site hairpin formation at a 12-bp spacer and vice versa. Hence, this study illustrates that synapsis suppresses single-site reactions, thereby explaining the high physiologic ratio of paired versus unpaired V(D)J recombination events in lymphoid cells.