The sites of deposition of newly synthesized histone

Assembling chromatin: the long and winding road

It has been over 35 years since the acceptance of the "chromatin subunit" hypothesis, and the recognition that nucleosomes are the fundamental repeating units of chromatin fibers. Major subjects of inquiry in the intervening years have included the steps involved in chromatin assembly, and the chaperones that escort histones to DNA. The following commentary offers an historical perspective on inquiries into the processes by which nucleosomes are assembled on replicating and nonreplicating chromatin. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Histone chaperones and Chromatin assembly.

All roads lead to chromatin: Multiple pathways for histone deposition

Chromatin, a complex of DNA and associated proteins, governs diverse processes including gene transcription, DNA replication and DNA repair. The fundamental unit of chromatin is the nucleosome, consisting of 147bp of DNA wound about 1.6 turns around a histone octamer of one (H3-H4)(2) tetramer and two H2A-H2B dimers. In order to form nucleosomes, (H3-H4)(2) tetramers are deposited first, followed by the rapid deposition of H2A-H2B. It is believed that the assembly of (H3-H4)(2) tetramers into nucleosomes is the rate-limiting step of nucleosome assembly. Moreover, assembly of H3-H4 into nucleosomes following DNA replication, DNA repair and gene transcription is likely to be a key step in the inheritance of epigenetic information and maintenance of genome integrity. In this review, we discuss how nucleosome assembly of H3-H4 is regulated by concerted actions of histone chaperones and modifications on newly synthesized H3 and H4. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Histone chaperones and Chromatin assembly.

Histone dynamics during transcription: exchange of H2A/H2B dimers and H3/H4 tetramers during pol II elongation

Chromatin within eukaryotic cell nuclei accommodates many complex activities that require at least partial disassembly and reassembly of nucleosomes. This disassembly/reassembly is thought to be somewhat localized when associated with processes such as site-specific DNA repair but likely occurs over extended regions during processive processes such as DNA replication or transcription. Here we review data addressing the effect of transcription elongation on nucleosome disassembly/reassembly, specifically focusing on the issue of transcription-dependent exchange of H2A/H2B dimers and H3/H4 tetramers. We suggest a model whereby passage of a polymerase through a nucleosome induces displacement of H2A/H2B dimers with a much higher probability than displacement of H3/H4 tetramers such that the extent of tetramer replacement is relatively low and proportional to polymerase density on any particular gene.

NAP-2 is part of multi-protein complexes in Hela cells

We previously reported that a complex of nuclear proteins from HeLa cells, among them histone H1 and casein kinase 2 co-eluted from immobilized nucleosome assembly protein 2 (NAP-2)-Sepharose. Here, using HeLa cell nuclear extracts, we found NAP-2 migrates in a blue-native polyacrylamide gel with an apparent molecular weight of 300 kDa. HeLa cell NAP-2, labeled in vivo with radioactive orthophosphate, co-precipitated with at least two phosphoproteins, with an apparent mass of 100 and 175 kDa, respectively, as determined by SDS-PAGE. NAP-2 from total HeLa cell extract co-purified with other proteins through two sequential chromatographic steps: first, a positively charged resin, Q-Sepharose, was used, which purified NAP-2 more easily with other proteins that eluted as a single peak at 0.5 M NaCl. This fraction possessed both relaxing and supercoiling activities, and it was able to assemble regularly spaced nucleosomes onto naked DNA in an ATP-dependent manner. Second, a negatively charged resin (heparin) was used, which retained small amounts of NAP-2 (a very acidic polypeptide) and topoisomerase I. This fraction, although able to supercoil relaxed DNA, did so to a lesser extent than the Q-Sepharose fraction. The data suggest that NAP-2 is in complex(es) with other proteins, which are distinct from histones.

Role of histone acetylation in the assembly and modulation of chromatin structures

The acetylation of the core histone N-terminal "tail" domains is now recognized as a highly conserved mechanism for regulating chromatin functional states. The following article examines possible roles of acetylation in two critically important cellular processes: replication-coupled nucleosome assembly, and reversible transitions in chromatin higher order structure. After a description of the acetylation of newly synthesized histones, and of the likely acetyltransferases involved, an overview of histone octamer assembly is presented. Our current understanding of the factors thought to assemble chromatin in vivo is then described. Genetic and biochemical investigations of the function the histone tails, and their acetylation, in nucleosome assembly are detailed, followed by an analysis of the importance of histone deacetylation in the maturation of newly replicated chromatin. In the final section the involvement of the histone tail domains in chromatin higher order structures is addressed, along with the role of histone acetylation in chromatin folding. Suggestions for future research are offered in the concluding remarks.

Histone H1 deposition and histone-DNA interactions in replicating chromatin

An immunochemical method for analyzing protein interactions with BrdUrd-substituted DNA was used to study binding of histones to nascent DNA in nuclei. The results indicate that in Ehrlich ascites tumor (EAT) cells, histone H1 deposits on newly replicated DNA simultaneously with or immediately after core histone deposition so that in chromatin replicated for 3 min, the stoichiometry of the histones is the same as in bulk chromatin. All histones, and especially histone H1, interact with nascent DNA more weakly than with bulk chromatin, although the efficiency of interaction via the globular domains seems to be the same for both types of chromatin.

Chromatin structure of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. A nucleosome repeat length that is shorter than the chromatosomal DNA length

We have used new methods for chromatin isolation, together with conventional methods for measuring the nucleosome repeat length, to determine the repeat length of Schizosaccharomyces pombe chromatin. We obtain a result of 156(+/- 2) bp. Equivalent results are obtained using a psoralen crosslinking method for measuring the repeat length in viable spheroplasts. That result, together with other control experiments, rules out many possible artifacts. The measured value of 156(+/- 2) bp is smaller than the length of DNA found in the chromatosome. Thus, the chromatosome cannot be the fundamental unit of chromatin structure in all eukaryotes. The crossed linker model of chromatin higher order structure is incompatible with a nucleosome repeat length of 156 bp, and thus cannot apply to all eukaryotes. The solenoid model of higher order structure is compatible with this repeat length only if the solenoid is right-handed. We note two other properties of this chromatin. (1) Early in digestion, the DNA length of mononucleosomes from S. pombe and Aspergillus nidulans exceeds the nucleosome repeat length. (2) Many methods for isolating chromatin from S. pombe yield an apparent nucleosome repeat length of less than or equal to 140 bp; this result is found to be an artifactual consequence of nucleosome sliding.

Deposition of newly synthesized histones: hybrid nucleosomes are not tandemly arranged on daughter DNA strands

Density labeling procedures have been utilized to study the dynamics of histone-histone interactions in vivo. Cells were labeled for 60 min with dense amino acids, and the label was chased for up to 22 h (two replication events for these cells). Nuclei were isolated and treated with formaldehyde to stabilize the histone-histone interactions with a covalent cross-link that produces an octameric complex of two each of H3, H2B, H2A, and H4. This complex was then extracted from the DNA and analyzed on density gradients. The results indicate that new H3,H4 deposits as a tetramer and does not dissociate in the subsequent chases. New H2A,H2B deposited as a dimer and also does not dissociate in subsequent chases. These new histones form hybrid octamers with old histones. On the basis of the new:old ratio in the hybrid octamers, we propose that additional old H2A,H2B from elsewhere in the genome interacts with tetramers of new H3,H4 to form the newly synthesized nucleosomes. It is also observed that 5% of the cross-linked complexes produced by formaldehyde are octamer-octamer (dioctamer). Upon analysis of the density of the dioctamer, the hybrid octamers were found adjacent to octamers that were homogeneous with respect to containing normal density histones. Control experiments are presented to demonstrate that the octamer-octamer cross-links are a product of intrastrand and not interstrand interactions between nucleosomes. These same control experiments also indicate that these procedures do not induce histone exchange during the preparative procedure prior to density gradient analysis. The significance of these results with regard to the dynamics of histone-histone interactions at the replication fork and the potential role in the maintenance of differentiation is discussed.

Chromatin assembly during SV40 DNA replication in vitro

A cytosol extract from human 293 cells supports efficient replication of SV40 origin-containing plasmid DNA in the presence of the SV40 T antigen. Addition of a nuclear extract from the same cells promotes negative supercoiling of the replicated DNA but not the bulk of the unreplicated DNA. The level of superhelicity is affected by the concentrations of T antigen and nuclear extract factors and by the time of addition of the nuclear extract. The replicated DNA in isolated DNA-protein complexes resists relaxation by purified HeLa cell topoisomerase I. Micrococcal nuclease digestion, sucrose gradient sedimentation, and electron microscopy demonstrate that the negative supercoils result from assembly of the replicating DNA into a chromatin structure. These results suggest that, during DNA replication, the core histones can be assembled on both sides of the replication fork by an active, replication-linked mechanism that does not require a template of preexisting nucleosomes.

Changes in histone acetylation during the development of rabbit bone marrow erythroid cells

The acetylation of histones in rabbit bone marrow erythroid cells was investigated by measuring the incorporation of labelled acetate into erythroblasts which were separated by velocity sedimentation at unit gravity into five fractions corresponding to different stages of development. Histone acetylation decreased during erythroid development in concert with a decline in DNA and histone synthesis. Some acetylation persisted after condensation of the nucleus and cessation of DNA synthesis in late orthochromatic cells. This residual acetylation may be related to the low level of transcription which is still present at this stage. Sodium butyrate increased the acetylation of histones 2- to 7-fold, with the greatest stimulation occurring in the most immature cells. The general decline in acetylation of histones during erythroid cell development was similar in the presence and absence of butyrate.

Histone synthesis and deposition in the G1 and S phases of hepatoma tissue culture cells

Hepatoma tissue culture cells were synchronized in G1 and in S phase in order to examine the level of synthesis of different histone types and to determine the rate, timing, and location of their deposition onto DNA. We observe a basal level of synthesis in G1 (5% of that seen in S phase) for H2A.1, H2A.2, H3.2, H2B, and H4. The minor histone variants X and Z are synthesized at 30% of the rate observed in S cells. The rate of synthesis of the ubiquinated histones uH2A.1,2 is not as depressed in G1 cells as seen for H2A.1 and H2A.2. Histones synthesized in G1 are not deposited on the DNA of these cells at equivalent rates. Thus, histones H3.2 and H4 are not deposited significantly until S phase begins, at which time deposition occurs selectively on newly synthesized DNA. The deposition of H2A.1, H2A.2, H2B, X, and Z proceeds in G1; however, it occurs to a 2-4-fold lower extent than seen for the deposition of H1, HMG 14, and HMG 17. The deposition of all histones synthesized in S phase occurs rapidly, but there are variations in the sites of deposition. Thus, newly synthesized H3.1, H3.2, and H4 deposit primarily on newly replicated DNA whereas H2A.1, H2A.2, uH2A.1, 2, and H2B deposit only partially on new DNA (30%) and mostly on old. H1, HMG 14, and HMG 17 are deposited in an apparently fully random manner over the chromatin. To interpret these observations, we propose a model which includes a measure of histone exchange on the chromatin fiber. The model emphasizes the dynamics of histone-histone and histone-DNA interactions in regions of active genes and at replication forks.

Histone segregation on replicating chromatin

We have reinvestigated the mode of segregation of preexisting histones onto replicating chromosomes. Since our previous data have indicated that only histones H3 and H4 do not appear to move from their association with the DNA strand with which they are bound until the next round of replication, we have concentrated our attention on these two histones. The strategy we have employed involved density labeling of DNA and radiolabeling of the histones of interest. Subsequently, we followed the association of histones and DNA during further rounds of DNA replication. One can make predictions concerning the nature of the association between specific histones and particular DNA strands depending on the mode of deposition. The results have confirmed our previous findings that histones segregate randomly. The possibility that such a result is a consequence of turnover of radiolabel in non-histone proteins and subsequent reutilization for histone synthesis has been tested directly. This process appears to be occurring to only a very limited extent. The implications of these conclusions for chromatin structure and gene control are discussed.

Fractionation of newly replicated nucleosomes by density labeling and rate zonal centrifugation for the analysis of the deposition sites of newly synthesized nucleosomal core histones

We have found that partial resolution of newly replicated nucleosomes can be achieved by rate zonal centrifugation through sucrose density gradients preformed in heavy water. Nucleosome samples were obtained from MH-134SC cells density labeled with 5-iododeoxyuridine in the presence of suitable isotopic precursors. The method is simple and can be performed under conditions that do not destabilize the nucleosome structure. This gave us an exciting opportunity to study the deposition sites of newly synthesized histones. Nucleosomes were obtained from cells pulse-labeled simultaneously with 5-iododeoxyuridine and [3H]lysine for the rate zonal analysis. Proteins in the resulting fractions were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and visualized by silver staining and fluorography. The distribution of newly synthesized H2A and H2B coincided closely with that of bulk nucleosomes. The distribution of newly synthesized H3 and H4 was shifted to the bottom sides of the bulk nucleosome peaks, but not so far as to the putative peaks of newly replicated (dense) nucleosomes. This means that newly synthesized histones are deposited on DNA in disproportionate amounts and that their sites of deposition are not restricted to newly replicated DNA.

Exchange of histones H1, H2A, and H2B in vivo

We have asked whether histones synthesized in the absence of DNA synthesis can exchange into nucleosomal structures. DNA synthesis was inhibited by incubating hepatoma tissue culture cells in medium containing 5.0 mM hydroxyurea for 40 min. During the final 20 min, the cells were pulsed with [3H]lysine to radiolabel the histones (all five histones are substantially labeled under these conditions). By two electrophoretic techniques, we demonstrate that histones H1, H2A, and H2B synthesized in the presence of hydroxyurea do not merely associate with the surface of the chromatin but instead exchange with preexisting histones so that for the latter two histones there is incorporation into nucleosome structures. On the other hand, H3 and H4 synthesized during this same time period appear to be only weakly bound, if at all, to chromatin. These two histones have been isolated from postnuclear washes and purified. Some possible implications of in vivo exchange are discussed.

Dispersive segregation of nucleosomes during replication of simian virus 40 chromosomes

The distribution of preformed ("old") histone octamers between the two arms of DNA replication forks was analyzed in simian virus 40(SV40)-infected cells following treatment with cycloheximide to prevent nucleosome assembly from nascent histones. Viral chromatin synthesized in the presence of cycloheximide was shown to be deficient in nucleosomes. Replicating SV40 DNA (wild-type 800 and capsid assembly mutant, tsB11) was radiolabeled in either intact cells or nuclear extracts supplemented with cytosol. Nascent nucleosomal monomers were then released by extensive digestion of isolated nuclei, nuclear extracts or isolated viral chromosomes with micrococcal nuclease. The labeled nucleosomal DNA was purified and found to hybridize to both strands of SV40 DNA restriction fragments taken from each side of the origin of DNA replication, whereas Okazaki fragments hybridized only to the strand representing the retrograde DNA template. In addition, isolated, replicating SV40 chromosomes were digested with two strand-specific exonucleases that excised nascent DNA from either the forward or the retrograde side of replication forks. Pretreatment of cells with cycloheximide did not result in an excess of prenucleosomal DNA on either side of replication forks, but did increase the amount of internucleosomal DNA. These data are consistent with a dispersive model for nucleosome segregation in which "old" histone octamers are distributed to both arms of DNA replication forks.

A model chromatin assembly system. Factors affecting nucleosome spacing

Poly[d(A-T)].poly[d(A-T)], when reconstituted with chicken erythrocyte core histones and subsequently incubated with sufficient histone H5 in a solution containing polyglutamic acid, forms structures resembling chromatin. H5 induces nucleosome alignment in about two hours at physiological ionic strength and 37 degrees C. The nucleosome spacing and apparent linker heterogeneity in the assembled nucleoprotein are very similar to those in chicken erythrocyte chromatin. Also, condensed chromatin-like fibers on the polynucleotide can be visualized. The binding of one mole of H5 per mole of core octamer is necessary to generate the physiological nucleosome spacing, which remains constant with the addition of more H5. The nucleosome repeat length is not a function of the core histone to poly[d(A-T)] ratio for values lower than the physiological ratio. With increasing ratios, in excess of the physiological value, nucleosome spacing first becomes non-uniform, and then takes on the close packing limit of approximately 165 base-pairs. In addition to eliminating possible base sequence effects on nucleosome positioning, poly[d(A-T)] allows nucleosomes to slide more readily than does DNA, thereby facilitating alignment. Evidence is presented that polyglutamic acid facilitates the nucleosome spacing activity of histone H5, primarily by keeping the nucleoprotein soluble. This model system should be useful for understanding how different repeat lengths arise in chromatin.

Reduced repeat length of nascent nucleosomal DNA is generated by replicating chromatin in vivo

Micrococcal nuclease digestion of nuclei from sea urchin embryos revealed transient changes in chromatin structure which resulted in a reduction in the repeat length of nascent chromatin DNA as compared with bulk DNA. This was considered to be entirely the consequence of in vivo events at the replication fork (Cell 14, 259, 1978). However, a micrococcal nuclease-generated sliding of nucleosome cores relative to nascent DNA, which might account for the smaller DNA fragments, was not excluded. In vivo [3H]thymidine pulse-labeled nuclei were fixed with a formaldehyde prior to micrococcal nuclease digestion. This linked chromatin proteins to DNA and thus prevented any in vitro sliding of histone cores. All the nascent DNAs exhibiting shorter repeat lengths after micrococcal nuclease digestion, were resolved at identical mobilities in polyacrylamide gels of DNA from fixed and unfixed nuclei. We conclude that these differences in repeat lengths between nascent and bulk DNA was generated in vivo by changes in chromatin structure during replication, rather than by micrococcal nuclease-induced sliding of histone cores in vitro.

Two-stage maturation process for newly replicated chromatin

HTC cells have been labeled by short exposures to [3H]thymidine in order to identify newly synthesized DNA. By either isolating nuclei directly or isolating them after an extensive fixation with formaldehyde, we have been able to identify two phases in the maturation process of newly replicated chromatin. The first phase which is relatively brief (less than 5 min) is reflected in a diffuse, irregular organization of nucleosomes on new DNA immediately postreplicatively . The second phase which lasts from 5 to 30 min postreplication is characterized by a normal repeat length for the nucleosomes which are nonetheless more weakly bound than bulk nucleosomes. This is reflected in increased sliding during nuclease digestion as well as increased nuclease sensitivity and the presence of easily dissociated histones which has been described by other workers.

In vitro exchange of nucleosomal histones H2a and H2b

We have asked whether exogenous, radiolabeled histones can exchange with nucleosomal histones in an in vitro system. Using two different electrophoretic techniques, we were able to separate the histones contained in nucleosomes from those histones which were simply bound to the surface of the chromatin. Fluorography was used to determine which of the exogenous histones exchange with the nucleosomal histones. We observed substantial exchange of histones H1, H2a, and H2b when the chromatin and exogenous histones were incubated under approximately physiological conditions. We have also observed a small amount of exchange of H2a and H2b, as well as a substantial exchange of H1, from one chromatin fragment to another. Other conditions affecting the exchange of histones H2a and H2b are also reported.

Conservative segregation of nucleosome core histones

Density labelling studies have shown that nascent histones are not mixed with parental histones during the assembly of nucleosome cores. However, experiments in other laboratories, examining histone deposition with respect to newly synthesized DNA, have been interpreted as suggesting that a substantial proportion of core histones (greater than 15%) are randomized at each chromatin replication. The data presented here support our previous results in showing that conservatively assembled nucleosome core histone octamers are conservatively segregated over successive cell generations. It is also shown that the nucleosome cores assembled during 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine inhibition of DNA synthesis are conservatively segregated for a minimum of five or six cell generations. These results suggest that the nonrandom assembly of nucleosome cores is not merely a coincidence of the mechanism of histone transport into the nucleus and that the conservative mode of nucleosome segregation is a fundamental feature of chromatin replication, one which is stable to modulations in chromatin packaging.

Stability of the conservative mode of nucleosome assembly

The conservative assembly of nucleosome histone octamer cores has been confirmed by electrophoretic analysis of density labeled histones following equilibrium buoyant density centrifugation. After normal replication, crosslinked octamers are shown not to contain a mixture of new and old core histones. Moreover, when DNA synthesis is inhibited by ara-C nucleosome cores are still assembled exclusively from nascent histone. Similarly, after release from cycloheximide inhibition newly synthesized core histone is conservatively deposited. Thus, a conservative mechanism of histone octamer assembly occurs when nascent histone is present in the normal stoichiometry to nascent DNA and when chromatin is assembled in nascent histone or nascent DNA excess.

Histone H5 can increase the internucleosome spacing in dinucleosomes to nativelike values

Chicken erythrocyte chromatin was assembled with inner histones at about 60% of the ratio found in vivo and subsequently incubated with histone H5 (or H1 + H5) in a solution containing 0.1 M NaCl and poly(glutamic acid). Micrococcal nuclease digestion produced dinucleosomes of 360-390 base pair (bp) DNA content, similar to those from native chromatin and contrasting with the 270-280 bp species found in material incubated without H5. On sucrose gradients a dinucleosome sedimenting at 16 S containing 360 bp DNA was isolated. Removal of H1 + H5 after reconstitution did not change these results; H5 thus can induce rearrangements of nucleosome cores with respect to their neighbors. The results are interpreted as an H5-induced "sliding apart" of histone octamers, complementary to the "sliding together" found in native chromatin after removal of H1 + H5.

Histone H5 can correctly align randomly arranged nucleosomes in a defined in vitro system

In eukaryotic cells, DNA is packed into regularly spaced chromatin subunits called nucleosomes. The average distance between nucleosomes (the repeat length) varies in a tissue- and species-specific manner, with values ranging from about 160 to 240 DNA base pairs (bp). Thus, it has been recognized that the repeat length could be one of the factors underlying selective gene expression. In cells growing in culture, the characteristic repeat length for that type of cell seems to arise from an immature chromatin structure in which nucleosomes are initially irregularly spaced or are arranged in small closely packed clusters. At present no in vitro system has been described which is capable of reconstituting the mature physiological nucleosome spacing from purified chromatin components. Moreover, neither the factors necessary for spacing nor the reaction mechanism are known. We describe here an in vitro system that can restore the native subunit spacing in rearranged chromatin samples which have irregularly spaced nucleosomes similar to the situation apparent in newly replicated chromatin.

Assembly kinetics of replicating chromatin: isolation and characterization of prenucleosomal and nucleosomal DNA

Replicating chromatin is known to be more sensitive to micrococcal nuclease than bulk chromatin. We have used this property and a fractionation procedure based on the specific release of replicating material under mild micrococcal nuclease digestion, in order to analyse both the kinetics of maturation of newly replicated DNA into nucleosomes and the structure of the replicating material. As other authors, we initially observed that repetitive unit of newly replicated chromatin was shorter than that of bulk chromatin, however this result appears to be due to sliding of nucleosomes along the chromatin fibers close to the replicating fork. Replicative chromatin was fractionated and analysed. A prenucleosomal peak was observed and preliminary characterized.

Chromatin replication, reconstitution and assembly

Many previously held concepts about the replication of chromatin have recently been revised, or seriously challenged. For instance, within the last two years, evidence has accumulated to indicate that newly synthesized DNA is not the sole site of deposition of newly synthesized histones, and that histones are not only made, but are assembled into chromatin in the absence of DNA synthesis. Furthermore, segregation of parental histones to daughter DNA duplexes may be bidirectional, rather than the previously accepted unidirectional mechanism. The storage of histones prior to assembly apparently involves histone pairs rather than octamers, and similarly, histones associate with DNA in (apparent) pairs, rather than as pre-assembled octameric units. It is currently questioned whether or not nucleoplasmin is involved in either histone storage or nucleosome assembly. The onset of histone synthesis has recently been found to occur in late G1 rather than in S, and thus is independent of DNA synthesis; however, the cessation of histone synthesis is linked to that of DNA. Thus, there emerges from this newly accumulated data the conclusion that chromatin biosynthesis is not as straightforward as was believed just a few years ago. As we review the evidence on each of these subjects, we attempt to point out directions for future experimentation.

Organization of the newly replicated chromatin in the vicinity of the replication fork

Ehrlich ascites tumour cells were pulse-labelled with [3H]thymidine for 1 min or were treated with cycloheximide and labelled with [3H]thymidine for 45 min. The kinetics of digestion with micrococcal nuclease of both pulse-labelled and cycloheximide chromatins showed that they exhibited increased susceptibility towards the enzyme. At the same time their release from the nucleus was retarded and this was interpreted to mean that, unlike the bulk of chromatin, they were tightly bound to a fixed nuclear structure. When subjected to an equilibrium metrizamide-triethanolamine density gradient centrifugation both pulse-labelled and cycloheximide chromatins banded at higher density than control chromatin, which was an indication of their higher protein to DNA ratio. After a mild trypsinization, eliminating H1 and the nonhistone proteins, the pulse-labelled chromatin sedimented to the same density as control chromatin, and the cycloheximide chromatin sedimented to a density which was intermediate between those of control chromatin and free DNA. This result showed that the newly replicated chromatin had the same, and the cycloheximide chromatin half the amount of core histones present in control chromatin.

Assembly of new histones into nucleosomes and their distribution in replicating chromatin

We studied the assembly of new histones into nucleosomes and their distribution in replicating chromatin in growing P815 mouse cells. New histones and new DNA were density-labeled with 13C, 15N, 2H-substituted amino acids together with [3H]arginine or with 5-iododeoxyuridine and [3H]thymidine, respectively, for 1 hr (approximately 20% of S phase). Mono- di-, tri-, tetra- and larger oligonucleosomes were isolated by sucrose gradient centrifugation of micrococcal nuclease-digested chromatin, and their density distribution was analyzed, without fixation, in metrizamide/triethanolamine density gradients [Russev, G. and Tsanev, R. (1976) Nucleic Acids Res. 3, 697-707] in which mono- and oligonucleosomes containing dense amino acids or 5-iododeoxyuridine separate from the corresponding normal nucleosomes. Under these conditions, approximately 74% of the new histones are found in nucleosomes on newly replicated DNA, and the remainder are on unreplicated DNA. The majority of new histones form entirely new nucleosomes; a minor fraction may form hybrid nucleosomes that also contain preexisting histones. New nucleosomes are distributed to both new daughter DNA molecules with approximately equal probability, and our evidence suggests, but does not prove, that they are distributed in a random manner along new DNA.