1
|
Mackay HL, Stone HR, Ronson GE, Ellis K, Lanz A, Aghabi Y, Walker AK, Starowicz K, Garvin AJ, Van Eijk P, Koestler SA, Anthony EJ, Piberger AL, Chauhan AS, Conway-Thomas P, Vaitsiankova A, Vijayendran S, Beesley JF, Petermann E, Brown EJ, Densham RM, Reed SH, Dobbs F, Saponaro M, Morris JR. USP50 suppresses alternative RecQ helicase use and deleterious DNA2 activity during replication. Nat Commun 2024; 15:8102. [PMID: 39284827 PMCID: PMC11405836 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52250-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Mammalian DNA replication relies on various DNA helicase and nuclease activities to ensure accurate genetic duplication, but how different helicase and nuclease activities are properly directed remains unclear. Here, we identify the ubiquitin-specific protease, USP50, as a chromatin-associated protein required to promote ongoing replication, fork restart, telomere maintenance, cellular survival following hydroxyurea or pyridostatin treatment, and suppression of DNA breaks near GC-rich sequences. We find that USP50 supports proper WRN-FEN1 localisation at or near stalled replication forks. Nascent DNA in cells lacking USP50 shows increased association of the DNA2 nuclease and RECQL4 and RECQL5 helicases and replication defects in cells lacking USP50, or FEN1 are driven by these proteins. Consequently, suppression of DNA2 or RECQL4/5 improves USP50-depleted cell resistance to agents inducing replicative stress and restores telomere stability. These data define an unexpected regulatory protein that promotes the balance of helicase and nuclease use at ongoing and stalled replication forks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah L Mackay
- Birmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Helen R Stone
- Birmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
- CCTT-C Cancer Research UK, Clinical trials unit, Sir Robert Aitken building, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - George E Ronson
- Birmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Katherine Ellis
- Birmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
- School of Chemical, Materials and Biological Engineering, University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK
| | - Alexander Lanz
- Birmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Yara Aghabi
- Birmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Alexandra K Walker
- Birmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Katarzyna Starowicz
- Birmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
- Adthera Bio, Lyndon House, 62 Hagley Road, Birmingham, B16 8PE, UK
| | - Alexander J Garvin
- Birmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
- SUMO Biology Lab, School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Patrick Van Eijk
- Broken String Biosciences Ltd., BioData Innovation Centre, Unit AB3-03, Level 3, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1DR, UK
- Division of Cancer & Genetics School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK
| | - Stefan A Koestler
- Birmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Elizabeth J Anthony
- Birmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Ann Liza Piberger
- Birmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Anoop S Chauhan
- Birmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Poppy Conway-Thomas
- Birmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Alina Vaitsiankova
- Genome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9RQ, UK
- Department of Genetics and Development, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sobana Vijayendran
- Birmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
- University Hospital Birmingham N.H.S. Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - James F Beesley
- Birmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Eva Petermann
- Birmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Eric J Brown
- Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 421 Curie Boulevard PA, 19104-6160, USA
| | - Ruth M Densham
- Birmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Simon H Reed
- Broken String Biosciences Ltd., BioData Innovation Centre, Unit AB3-03, Level 3, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1DR, UK
- Division of Cancer & Genetics School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK
| | - Felix Dobbs
- Broken String Biosciences Ltd., BioData Innovation Centre, Unit AB3-03, Level 3, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1DR, UK
- Division of Cancer & Genetics School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK
| | - Marco Saponaro
- Birmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Joanna R Morris
- Birmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nickoloff JA, Sharma N, Taylor L, Allen SJ, Hromas R. The Safe Path at the Fork: Ensuring Replication-Associated DNA Double-Strand Breaks are Repaired by Homologous Recombination. Front Genet 2021; 12:748033. [PMID: 34646312 PMCID: PMC8502867 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.748033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Cells must replicate and segregate their DNA to daughter cells accurately to maintain genome stability and prevent cancer. DNA replication is usually fast and accurate, with intrinsic (proofreading) and extrinsic (mismatch repair) error-correction systems. However, replication forks slow or stop when they encounter DNA lesions, natural pause sites, and difficult-to-replicate sequences, or when cells are treated with DNA polymerase inhibitors or hydroxyurea, which depletes nucleotide pools. These challenges are termed replication stress, to which cells respond by activating DNA damage response signaling pathways that delay cell cycle progression, stimulate repair and replication fork restart, or induce apoptosis. Stressed forks are managed by rescue from adjacent forks, repriming, translesion synthesis, template switching, and fork reversal which produces a single-ended double-strand break (seDSB). Stressed forks also collapse to seDSBs when they encounter single-strand nicks or are cleaved by structure-specific nucleases. Reversed and cleaved forks can be restarted by homologous recombination (HR), but seDSBs pose risks of mis-rejoining by non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) to other DSBs, causing genome rearrangements. HR requires resection of broken ends to create 3' single-stranded DNA for RAD51 recombinase loading, and resected ends are refractory to repair by NHEJ. This Mini Review highlights mechanisms that help maintain genome stability by promoting resection of seDSBs and accurate fork restart by HR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jac A Nickoloff
- Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO, United States
| | - Neelam Sharma
- Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO, United States
| | - Lynn Taylor
- Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO, United States
| | - Sage J Allen
- Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO, United States
| | - Robert Hromas
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine and the Mays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ononye OE, Sausen CW, Bochman ML, Balakrishnan L. Dynamic regulation of Pif1 acetylation is crucial to the maintenance of genome stability. Curr Genet 2020; 67:85-92. [PMID: 33079209 DOI: 10.1007/s00294-020-01116-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Revised: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
PIF1 family helicases are evolutionarily conserved among prokaryotes and eukaryotes. These enzymes function to support genome integrity by participating in multiple DNA transactions that can be broadly grouped into DNA replication, DNA repair, and telomere maintenance roles. However, the levels of PIF1 activity in cells must be carefully controlled, as Pif1 over-expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is toxic, and knockdown or over-expression of human PIF1 (hPIF1) supports cancer cell growth. This suggests that PIF1 family helicases must be subject to tight regulation in vivo to direct their activities to where and when they are needed, as well as to maintain those activities at proper homeostatic levels. Previous work shows that C-terminal phosphorylation of S. cerevisiae Pif1 regulates its telomere maintenance activity, and we recently identified that Pif1 is also regulated by lysine acetylation. The over-expression toxicity of Pif1 was exacerbated in cells lacking the Rpd3 lysine deacetylase, but mutation of the NuA4 lysine acetyltransferase subunit Esa1 ameliorated this toxicity. Using recombinant proteins, we found that acetylation stimulated the DNA binding affinity, ATPase activity, and DNA unwinding activities of Pif1. All three domains of the helicase were targets of acetylation in vitro, and multiple lines of evidence suggest that acetylation drives a conformational change in the N-terminal domain of Pif1 that impacts this stimulation. It is currently unclear what triggers lysine acetylation of Pif1 and how this modification impacts the many in vivo functions of the helicase, but future work promises to shed light on how this protein is tightly regulated within the cell.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Onyekachi E Ononye
- Department of Biology, School of Science, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA
| | - Christopher W Sausen
- Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry Department, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA
| | - Matthew L Bochman
- Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry Department, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA.
| | - Lata Balakrishnan
- Department of Biology, School of Science, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dhar S, Datta A, Brosh RM. DNA helicases and their roles in cancer. DNA Repair (Amst) 2020; 96:102994. [PMID: 33137625 DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2020.102994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
DNA helicases, known for their fundamentally important roles in genomic stability, are high profile players in cancer. Not only are there monogenic helicase disorders with a strong disposition to cancer, it is well appreciated that helicase variants are associated with specific cancers (e.g., breast cancer). Flipping the coin, DNA helicases are frequently overexpressed in cancerous tissues and reduction in helicase gene expression results in reduced proliferation and growth capacity, as well as DNA damage induction and apoptosis of cancer cells. The seminal roles of helicases in the DNA damage and replication stress responses, as well as DNA repair pathways, validate their vital importance in cancer biology and suggest their potential values as targets in anti-cancer therapy. In recent years, many laboratories have characterized the specialized roles of helicase to resolve transcription-replication conflicts, maintain telomeres, mediate cell cycle checkpoints, remodel stalled replication forks, and regulate transcription. In vivo models, particularly mice, have been used to interrogate helicase function and serve as a bridge for preclinical studies that may lead to novel therapeutic approaches. In this review, we will summarize our current knowledge of DNA helicases and their roles in cancer, emphasizing the latest developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srijita Dhar
- Laboratory of Molecular Gerontology, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA
| | - Arindam Datta
- Laboratory of Molecular Gerontology, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA
| | - Robert M Brosh
- Laboratory of Molecular Gerontology, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Appanah R, Jones D, Falquet B, Rass U. Limiting homologous recombination at stalled replication forks is essential for cell viability: DNA2 to the rescue. Curr Genet 2020; 66:1085-1092. [PMID: 32909097 PMCID: PMC7599155 DOI: 10.1007/s00294-020-01106-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The disease-associated nuclease–helicase DNA2 has been implicated in DNA end-resection during DNA double-strand break repair, Okazaki fragment processing, and the recovery of stalled DNA replication forks (RFs). Its role in Okazaki fragment processing has been proposed to explain why DNA2 is indispensable for cell survival across organisms. Unexpectedly, we found that DNA2 has an essential role in suppressing homologous recombination (HR)-dependent replication restart at stalled RFs. In the absence of DNA2-mediated RF recovery, excessive HR-restart of stalled RFs results in toxic levels of abortive recombination intermediates that lead to DNA damage-checkpoint activation and terminal cell-cycle arrest. While HR proteins protect and restart stalled RFs to promote faithful genome replication, these findings show how HR-dependent replication restart is actively constrained by DNA2 to ensure cell survival. These new insights disambiguate the effects of DNA2 dysfunction on cell survival, and provide a framework to rationalize the association of DNA2 with cancer and the primordial dwarfism disorder Seckel syndrome based on its role in RF recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rowin Appanah
- Genome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9RQ, UK
| | - David Jones
- Genome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9RQ, UK
| | - Benoît Falquet
- Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.,Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Basel, 4056, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ulrich Rass
- Genome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9RQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ononye OE, Sausen CW, Balakrishnan L, Bochman ML. Lysine acetylation regulates the activity of nuclear Pif1. J Biol Chem 2020; 295:15482-15497. [PMID: 32878983 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.ra120.015164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the Pif1 helicase functions in both nuclear and mitochondrial DNA replication and repair processes, preferentially unwinding RNA:DNA hybrids and resolving G-quadruplex structures. We sought to determine how the various activities of Pif1 are regulated in vivo Here, we report lysine acetylation of nuclear Pif1 and demonstrate that it influences both Pif1's cellular roles and core biochemical activities. Using Pif1 overexpression toxicity assays, we determined that the acetyltransferase NuA4 and deacetylase Rpd3 are primarily responsible for the dynamic acetylation of nuclear Pif1. MS analysis revealed that Pif1 was modified in several domains throughout the protein's sequence on the N terminus (Lys-118 and Lys-129), helicase domain (Lys-525, Lys-639, and Lys-725), and C terminus (Lys-800). Acetylation of Pif1 exacerbated its overexpression toxicity phenotype, which was alleviated upon deletion of its N terminus. Biochemical assays demonstrated that acetylation of Pif1 stimulated its helicase, ATPase, and DNA-binding activities, whereas maintaining its substrate preferences. Limited proteolysis assays indicate that acetylation of Pif1 induces a conformational change that may account for its altered enzymatic properties. We propose that acetylation is involved in regulating of Pif1 activities, influencing a multitude of DNA transactions vital to the maintenance of genome integrity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Onyekachi E Ononye
- Department of Biology, School of Science, Indiana University, Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Christopher W Sausen
- Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry Department, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
| | - Lata Balakrishnan
- Department of Biology, School of Science, Indiana University, Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
| | - Matthew L Bochman
- Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry Department, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
| |
Collapse
|