1
|
Rojas P, Wang J, Guglielmi G, Sadurnì MM, Pavlou L, Leung GHD, Rajagopal V, Spill F, Saponaro M. Genome-wide identification of replication fork stalling/pausing sites and the interplay between RNA Pol II transcription and DNA replication progression. Genome Biol 2024; 25:126. [PMID: 38773641 PMCID: PMC11106976 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-024-03278-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND DNA replication progression can be affected by the presence of physical barriers like the RNA polymerases, leading to replication stress and DNA damage. Nonetheless, we do not know how transcription influences overall DNA replication progression. RESULTS To characterize sites where DNA replication forks stall and pause, we establish a genome-wide approach to identify them. This approach uses multiple timepoints during S-phase to identify replication fork/stalling hotspots as replication progresses through the genome. These sites are typically associated with increased DNA damage, overlapped with fragile sites and with breakpoints of rearrangements identified in cancers but do not overlap with replication origins. Overlaying these sites with a genome-wide analysis of RNA polymerase II transcription, we find that replication fork stalling/pausing sites inside genes are directly related to transcription progression and activity. Indeed, we find that slowing down transcription elongation slows down directly replication progression through genes. This indicates that transcription and replication can coexist over the same regions. Importantly, rearrangements found in cancers overlapping transcription-replication collision sites are detected in non-transformed cells and increase following treatment with ATM and ATR inhibitors. At the same time, we find instances where transcription activity favors replication progression because it reduces histone density. CONCLUSIONS Altogether, our findings highlight how transcription and replication overlap during S-phase, with both positive and negative consequences for replication fork progression and genome stability by the coexistence of these two processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Rojas
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Jianming Wang
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Giovanni Guglielmi
- School of Mathematics, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Martina Mustè Sadurnì
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Lucas Pavlou
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Geoffrey Ho Duen Leung
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Vijay Rajagopal
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Fabian Spill
- School of Mathematics, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Marco Saponaro
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Corazzi L, Ionasz VS, Andrejev S, Wang LC, Vouzas A, Giaisi M, Di Muzio G, Ding B, Marx AJM, Henkenjohann J, Allers MM, Gilbert DM, Wei PC. Linear interaction between replication and transcription shapes DNA break dynamics at recurrent DNA break Clusters. Nat Commun 2024; 15:3594. [PMID: 38678011 PMCID: PMC11055891 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47934-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Recurrent DNA break clusters (RDCs) are replication-transcription collision hotspots; many are unique to neural progenitor cells. Through high-resolution replication sequencing and a capture-ligation assay in mouse neural progenitor cells experiencing replication stress, we unravel the replication features dictating RDC location and orientation. Most RDCs occur at the replication forks traversing timing transition regions (TTRs), where sparse replication origins connect unidirectional forks. Leftward-moving forks generate telomere-connected DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), while rightward-moving forks lead to centromere-connected DSBs. Strand-specific mapping for DNA-bound RNA reveals co-transcriptional dual-strand DNA:RNA hybrids present at a higher density in RDC than in other actively transcribed long genes. In addition, mapping RNA polymerase activity uncovers that head-to-head interactions between replication and transcription machinery result in 60% DSB contribution to the head-on compared to 40% for co-directional. Taken together we reveal TTR as a fragile class and show how the linear interaction between transcription and replication impacts genome stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Corazzi
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Bioscience, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vivien S Ionasz
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Bioscience, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Li-Chin Wang
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Athanasios Vouzas
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA
- San Diego Biomedical Research Institute, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA
| | - Marco Giaisi
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Giulia Di Muzio
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Bioscience, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Center for Neurosciences, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Boyu Ding
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Bioscience, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anna J M Marx
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Bioscience, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Center for Neurosciences, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jonas Henkenjohann
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Bioscience, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Center for Neurosciences, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael M Allers
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David M Gilbert
- San Diego Biomedical Research Institute, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA
| | - Pei-Chi Wei
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Faculty of Bioscience, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Interdisciplinary Center for Neurosciences, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jones RM, Reynolds-Winczura A, Gambus A. A Decade of Discovery-Eukaryotic Replisome Disassembly at Replication Termination. BIOLOGY 2024; 13:233. [PMID: 38666845 PMCID: PMC11048390 DOI: 10.3390/biology13040233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Revised: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
The eukaryotic replicative helicase (CMG complex) is assembled during DNA replication initiation in a highly regulated manner, which is described in depth by other manuscripts in this Issue. During DNA replication, the replicative helicase moves through the chromatin, unwinding DNA and facilitating nascent DNA synthesis by polymerases. Once the duplication of a replicon is complete, the CMG helicase and the remaining components of the replisome need to be removed from the chromatin. Research carried out over the last ten years has produced a breakthrough in our understanding, revealing that replication termination, and more specifically replisome disassembly, is indeed a highly regulated process. This review brings together our current understanding of these processes and highlights elements of the mechanism that are conserved or have undergone divergence throughout evolution. Finally, we discuss events beyond the classic termination of DNA replication in S-phase and go over the known mechanisms of replicative helicase removal from chromatin in these particular situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca M. Jones
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, Birmingham Centre for Genome Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (R.M.J.); (A.R.-W.)
- School of Biosciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK
| | - Alicja Reynolds-Winczura
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, Birmingham Centre for Genome Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (R.M.J.); (A.R.-W.)
| | - Agnieszka Gambus
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, Birmingham Centre for Genome Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (R.M.J.); (A.R.-W.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu Y, Zhangding Z, Liu X, Gan T, Ai C, Wu J, Liang H, Chen M, Guo Y, Lu R, Jiang Y, Ji X, Gao N, Kong D, Li Q, Hu J. Fork coupling directs DNA replication elongation and termination. Science 2024; 383:1215-1222. [PMID: 38484065 DOI: 10.1126/science.adj7606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
DNA replication is initiated at multiple loci to ensure timely duplication of eukaryotic genomes. Sister replication forks progress bidirectionally, and replication terminates when two convergent forks encounter one another. To investigate the coordination of replication forks, we developed a replication-associated in situ HiC method to capture chromatin interactions involving nascent DNA. We identify more than 2000 fountain-like structures of chromatin contacts in human and mouse genomes, indicative of coupling of DNA replication forks. Replication fork interaction not only occurs between sister forks but also involves forks from two distinct origins to predetermine replication termination. Termination-associated chromatin fountains are sensitive to replication stress and lead to coupled forks-associated genomic deletions in cancers. These findings reveal the spatial organization of DNA replication forks within the chromatin context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Liu
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University; Beijing 100871, China
- PKU-THU Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Zhengrong Zhangding
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University; Beijing 100871, China
| | - Xuhao Liu
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University; Beijing 100871, China
| | - Tingting Gan
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University; Beijing 100871, China
- PKU-THU Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
- Peking University ChengDu Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Biotechnologies, Chengdu, Sichuan 610213, China
| | - Chen Ai
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University; Beijing 100871, China
- PKU-THU Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Jinchun Wu
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University; Beijing 100871, China
- PKU-THU Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Haoxin Liang
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University; Beijing 100871, China
| | - Mohan Chen
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University; Beijing 100871, China
| | - Yuefeng Guo
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University; Beijing 100871, China
| | - Rusen Lu
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University; Beijing 100871, China
- PKU-THU Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Yongpeng Jiang
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University; Beijing 100871, China
- PKU-THU Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Xiong Ji
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University; Beijing 100871, China
- PKU-THU Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Ning Gao
- PKU-THU Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
- State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Daochun Kong
- PKU-THU Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
- State Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Qing Li
- PKU-THU Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
- State Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Jiazhi Hu
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University; Beijing 100871, China
- PKU-THU Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
- Peking University ChengDu Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Biotechnologies, Chengdu, Sichuan 610213, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Corazzi L, Ionasz V, Andrejev S, Wang LC, Vouzas A, Giaisi M, Di Muzio G, Ding B, Marx AJM, Henkenjohann J, Allers MM, Gilbert DM, Wei PC. Linear Interaction Between Replication and Transcription Shapes DNA Break Dynamics at Recurrent DNA Break Clusters. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2023.08.22.554340. [PMID: 37662334 PMCID: PMC10473677 DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.22.554340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
Recurrent DNA break clusters (RDCs) are replication-transcription collision hotspots; many are unique to neural progenitor cells. Through high-resolution replication sequencing and a capture-ligation assay in mouse neural progenitor cells experiencing replication stress, we unraveled the replication features dictating RDC location and orientation. Most RDCs occur at the replication forks traversing timing transition regions (TTRs), where sparse replication origins connect unidirectional forks. Leftward-moving forks generate telomere-connected DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), while rightward-moving forks lead to centromere-connected DSBs. Strand-specific mapping for DNA-bound RNA revealed co-transcriptional dual-strand DNA:RNA hybrids present at a higher density in RDC than in other actively transcribed long genes. In addition, mapping RNA polymerase activity revealed that head-to-head interactions between replication and transcription machinery resulted in 60% DSB contribution to the head-on compared to 40% for co-directional. Our findings revealed TTR as a novel fragile class and highlighted how the linear interaction between transcription and replication impacts genome stability.
Collapse
|
6
|
Li Z, Duan S, Hua X, Xu X, Li Y, Menolfi D, Zhou H, Lu C, Zha S, Goff SP, Zhang Z. Asymmetric distribution of parental H3K9me3 in S phase silences L1 elements. Nature 2023; 623:643-651. [PMID: 37938774 PMCID: PMC11034792 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06711-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
In eukaryotes, repetitive DNA sequences are transcriptionally silenced through histone H3 lysine 9 trimethylation (H3K9me3). Loss of silencing of the repeat elements leads to genome instability and human diseases, including cancer and ageing1-3. Although the role of H3K9me3 in the establishment and maintenance of heterochromatin silencing has been extensively studied4-6, the pattern and mechanism that underlie the partitioning of parental H3K9me3 at replicating DNA strands are unknown. Here we report that H3K9me3 is preferentially transferred onto the leading strands of replication forks, which occurs predominantly at long interspersed nuclear element (LINE) retrotransposons (also known as LINE-1s or L1s) that are theoretically transcribed in the head-on direction with replication fork movement. Mechanistically, the human silencing hub (HUSH) complex interacts with the leading-strand DNA polymerase Pol ε and contributes to the asymmetric segregation of H3K9me3. Cells deficient in Pol ε subunits (POLE3 and POLE4) or the HUSH complex (MPP8 and TASOR) show compromised H3K9me3 asymmetry and increased LINE expression. Similar results were obtained in cells expressing a MPP8 mutant defective in H3K9me3 binding and in TASOR mutants with reduced interactions with Pol ε. These results reveal an unexpected mechanism whereby the HUSH complex functions with Pol ε to promote asymmetric H3K9me3 distribution at head-on LINEs to suppress their expression in S phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiming Li
- Institute for Cancer Genetics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Genetics and Development, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shoufu Duan
- Institute for Cancer Genetics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Genetics and Development, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Xu Hua
- Institute for Cancer Genetics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Genetics and Development, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Xiaowei Xu
- Institute for Cancer Genetics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Genetics and Development, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yinglu Li
- Department of Genetics and Development, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Demis Menolfi
- Institute for Cancer Genetics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hui Zhou
- Institute for Cancer Genetics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Genetics and Development, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chao Lu
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Genetics and Development, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shan Zha
- Institute for Cancer Genetics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Departments of Pathology and Cell Biology, Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stephen P Goff
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Departments of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zhiguo Zhang
- Institute for Cancer Genetics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Genetics and Development, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Genome-wide measurement of DNA replication fork directionality and quantification of DNA replication initiation and termination with Okazaki fragment sequencing. Nat Protoc 2023; 18:1260-1295. [PMID: 36653528 DOI: 10.1038/s41596-022-00793-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Studying the dynamics of genome replication in mammalian cells has been historically challenging. To reveal the location of replication initiation and termination in the human genome, we developed Okazaki fragment sequencing (OK-seq), a quantitative approach based on the isolation and strand-specific sequencing of Okazaki fragments, the lagging strand replication intermediates. OK-seq quantitates the proportion of leftward- and rightward-oriented forks at every genomic locus and reveals the location and efficiency of replication initiation and termination events. Here we provide the detailed experimental procedures for performing OK-seq in unperturbed cultured human cells and budding yeast and the bioinformatics pipelines for data processing and computation of replication fork directionality. Furthermore, we present the analytical approach based on a hidden Markov model, which allows automated detection of ascending, descending and flat replication fork directionality segments revealing the zones of replication initiation, termination and unidirectional fork movement across the entire genome. These tools are essential for the accurate interpretation of human and yeast replication programs. The experiments and the data processing can be accomplished within six days. Besides revealing the genome replication program in fine detail, OK-seq has been instrumental in numerous studies unravelling mechanisms of genome stability, epigenome maintenance and genome evolution.
Collapse
|