Mechanism of lesion verification by the human XPD helicase in nucleotide excision repair

STK19 facilitates the clearance of lesion-stalled RNAPII during transcription-coupled DNA repair

Transcription-coupled DNA repair (TCR) removes bulky DNA lesions impeding RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) transcription. Recent studies have outlined the stepwise assembly of TCR factors CSB, CSA, UVSSA, and TFIIH around lesion-stalled RNAPII. However, the mechanism and factors required for the transition to downstream repair steps, including RNAPII removal to provide repair proteins access to the DNA lesion, remain unclear. Here, we identify STK19 as a new TCR factor facilitating this transition. Loss of STK19 does not impact initial TCR complex assembly or RNAPII ubiquitylation but delays lesion-stalled RNAPII clearance, thereby interfering with the downstream repair reaction. Cryo-EM and mutational analysis reveal that STK19 associates with the TCR complex, positioning itself between RNAPII, UVSSA, and CSA. The structural insights and molecular modeling suggest that STK19 positions the ATPase subunits of TFIIH onto DNA in front of RNAPII. Together, these findings provide new insights into the factors and mechanisms required for TCR.

XPD stalled on cross-linked DNA provides insight into damage verification

The superfamily 2 helicase XPD is a central component of the general transcription factor II H (TFIIH), which is essential for transcription and nucleotide excision DNA repair (NER). Within these two processes, the helicase function of XPD is vital for NER but not for transcription initiation, where XPD acts only as a scaffold for other factors. Using cryo-EM, we deciphered one of the most enigmatic steps in XPD helicase action: the active separation of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and its stalling upon approaching a DNA interstrand cross-link, a highly toxic form of DNA damage. The structure shows how dsDNA is separated and reveals a highly unusual involvement of the Arch domain in active dsDNA separation. Combined with mutagenesis and biochemical analyses, we identified distinct functional regions important for helicase activity. Surprisingly, those areas also affect core TFIIH translocase activity, revealing a yet unencountered function of XPD within the TFIIH scaffold. In summary, our data provide a universal basis for NER bubble formation, XPD damage verification and XPG incision.

Characterization of human XPD helicase activity with single-molecule magnetic tweezers

XPD helicase is a DNA-unwinding enzyme involved in DNA repair. As part of TFIIH, XPD opens a repair bubble in DNA for access by proteins in the nucleotide excision repair pathway. XPD uses the energy from ATP hydrolysis to translocate in the 5' to 3' direction on one strand of duplex DNA, displacing the opposite strand in the process. We used magnetic tweezers assays to measure the double-stranded DNA unwinding and single-stranded DNA translocation activities of human XPD in isolation. In our experimental setup, hXPD exhibited low unwinding processivity of ∼14 bp and slow unwinding rate of ∼0.3 bp/s. Measurements of the ssDNA translocation activity demonstrated that hXPD translocated on ssDNA at a similar rate as unwinding, revealing that slow rate was an intrinsic property of the hXPD translocation. Individual unwinding and translocation events were composed of pauses and runs with a distribution of lengths and rates. Analysis of these events unveiled similar mean run lengths and rates for unwinding and translocation, indicating that the unwinding behavior was a direct reflection of the translocation activity. The analysis also revealed that hXPD spent similar time stalling and unwinding/translocating. The detailed basal activity of hXPD reported here provides a baseline for future studies on how hXPD activity is regulated by other TFIIH components.

Differing structures and dynamics of two photolesions portray verification differences by the human XPD helicase

Ultraviolet light generates cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) and pyrimidine 6-4 pyrimidone (6-4PP) photoproducts that cause skin malignancies if not repaired by nucleotide excision repair (NER). While the faster repair of the more distorting 6-4PPs is attributed mainly to more efficient recognition by XPC, the XPD lesion verification helicase may play a role, as it directly scans the damaged DNA strand. With extensive molecular dynamics simulations of XPD-bound single-strand DNA containing each lesion outside the entry pore of XPD, we elucidate strikingly different verification processes for these two lesions that have very different topologies. The open book-like CPD thymines are sterically blocked from pore entry and preferably entrapped by sensors that are outside the pore; however, the near-perpendicular 6-4PP thymines can enter, accompanied by a displacement of the Arch domain toward the lesion, which is thereby tightly accommodated within the pore. This trapped 6-4PP may inhibit XPD helicase activity to foster lesion verification by locking the Arch to other domains. Furthermore, the movement of the Arch domain, only in the case of 6-4PP, may trigger signaling to the XPG nuclease for subsequent lesion incision by fostering direct contact between the Arch domain and XPG, and thereby facilitating repair of 6-4PP.

Helicases required for nucleotide excision repair: structure, function and mechanism

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a major DNA repair pathway conserved from bacteria to humans. Various DNA helicases, a group of enzymes capable of separating DNA duplex into two strands through ATP binding and hydrolysis, are required by NER to unwind the DNA duplex around the lesion to create a repair bubble and for damage verification and removal. In prokaryotes, UvrB helicase is required for repair bubble formation and damage verification, while UvrD helicase is responsible for the removal of the excised damage containing single-strand (ss) DNA fragment. In addition, UvrD facilitates transcription-coupled repair (TCR) by backtracking RNA polymerase stalled at the lesion. In eukaryotes, two helicases XPB and XPD from the transcription factor TFIIH complex fulfill the helicase requirements of NER. Interestingly, homologs of all these four helicases UvrB, UvrD, XPB, and XPD have been identified in archaea. This review summarizes our current understanding about the structure, function, and mechanism of these four helicases.

At the core of nucleotide excision repair

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is unique in its ability to identify and remove vastly different lesions from DNA. Recent advances in the structural characterization of complexes involved in detection, verification, and excision of damaged DNA have reshaped our understanding of the molecular architecture of this efficient and accurate machinery. Initial damage recognition achieved through transcription coupled repair (TC-NER) or global genome repair (GG-NER) has been addressed by complexes of RNA Pol II with different TC-NER factors and XPC/RAD23B/Centrin-2 with TFIIH, respectively. Moreover, transcription factor IIH (TFIIH), one of the core repair factors and a central NER hub was resolved in different states, providing important insights how this complex facilitates DNA opening and damage verification. Combined, these recent advances led to a highly improved understanding of the molecular landscape of NER core processes, sharpening our view on how NER is successfully achieved.

The nucleotide excision repair proteins through the lens of molecular dynamics simulations

Mutations that affect the proteins responsible for the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway can lead to diseases such as xeroderma pigmentosum, trichothiodystrophy, Cockayne syndrome, and Cerebro-oculo-facio-skeletal syndrome. Hence, understanding their molecular behavior is needed to elucidate these diseases' phenotypes and how the NER pathway is organized and coordinated. Molecular dynamics techniques enable the study of different protein conformations, adaptable to any research question, shedding light on the dynamics of biomolecules. However, as important as they are, molecular dynamics studies focused on DNA repair pathways are still becoming more widespread. Currently, there are no review articles compiling the advancements made in molecular dynamics approaches applied to NER and discussing: (i) how this technique is currently employed in the field of DNA repair, focusing on NER proteins; (ii) which technical setups are being employed, their strengths and limitations; (iii) which insights or information are they providing to understand the NER pathway or NER-associated proteins; (iv) which open questions would be suited for this technique to answer; and (v) where can we go from here. These questions become even more crucial considering the numerous 3D structures published regarding the NER pathway's proteins in recent years. In this work, we tackle each one of these questions, revising and critically discussing the results published in the context of the NER pathway.

A scanning-to-incision switch in TFIIH-XPG induced by DNA damage licenses nucleotide excision repair

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is critical for removing bulky DNA base lesions and avoiding diseases. NER couples lesion recognition by XPC to strand separation by XPB and XPD ATPases, followed by lesion excision by XPF and XPG nucleases. Here, we describe key regulatory mechanisms and roles of XPG for and beyond its cleavage activity. Strikingly, by combing single-molecule imaging and bulk cleavage assays, we found that XPG binding to the 7-subunit TFIIH core (coreTFIIH) stimulates coreTFIIH-dependent double-strand (ds)DNA unwinding 10-fold, and XPG-dependent DNA cleavage by up to 700-fold. Simultaneous monitoring of rates for coreTFIIH single-stranded (ss)DNA translocation and dsDNA unwinding showed XPG acts by switching ssDNA translocation to dsDNA unwinding as a likely committed step. Pertinent to the NER pathway regulation, XPG incision activity is suppressed during coreTFIIH translocation on DNA but is licensed when coreTFIIH stalls at the lesion or when ATP hydrolysis is blocked. Moreover, ≥15 nucleotides of 5'-ssDNA is a prerequisite for efficient translocation and incision. Our results unveil a paired coordination mechanism in which key lesion scanning and DNA incision steps are sequentially coordinated, and damaged patch removal is only licensed after generation of ≥15 nucleotides of 5'-ssDNA, ensuring the correct ssDNA bubble size before cleavage.