Formation and removal of 1,N6-dimethyladenosine in mammalian transfer RNA

Site-specific quantification of Adenosine-to-Inosine RNA editing by Endonuclease-Mediated qPCR

RNA molecules contain diverse modified nucleobases that play pivotal roles in numerous biological processes. Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing, one of the most prevalent RNA modifications in mammalian cells, is linked to a multitude of human diseases. To unveil the functions of A-to-I RNA editing, accurate quantification of inosine at specific sites is essential. In this study, we developed an endonuclease-mediated cleavage and real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR method for A-to-I RNA editing (EM-qPCR) to quantitatively analyze A-to-I RNA editing at a single site. By employing this method, we successfully quantified the levels of A-to-I RNA editing on various transfer RNA (tRNA) molecules at position 34 (I34) in mammalian cells with precision. Subsequently, this method was applied to tissues from sleep-deprived mice, revealing a notable alteration in the levels of I34 between sleep-deprived and control mice. The proposed method sets a precedent for the quantitative analysis of A-to-I RNA editing at specific sites, facilitating a deeper understanding of the biological implications of A-to-I RNA editing.

Accurate identification of 8-oxoguanine in RNA with single-nucleotide resolution using ligase-dependent qPCR

8-oxoguanine (o8G), a prevalent oxidative modification in RNA induced by reactive oxygen species (ROS), plays a pivotal role in regulating RNA functions. Accurate detection and quantification of o8G modifications is critical to understanding their biological significance and potential as disease biomarkers, but effective detection methods remain limited. Here, we have developed a highly specific T3 DNA ligase-dependent qPCR assay that exploits the enzyme's ability to discriminate o8G from guanine (G) with single-nucleotide resolution. This method can detect o8G in RNA at levels as low as 500 fM, with an up to 18-fold higher selectivity for discriminating o8G from G. By simulating oxidative stress conditions in SH-SY5Y and HS683 cell lines treated with rotenone, we successfully identified site-specific o8G modifications in key miRNAs associated with neuroprotective responses, including miR-124, let-7a and miR-29a. The developed assay holds significant promise for the practical identification of o8G, facilitating its potential for detailed studies of o8G dynamics in various biological contexts and diseases.

tRNA m1A modification regulate HSC maintenance and self-renewal via mTORC1 signaling

Haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) possess unique physiological adaptations to sustain blood cell production and cope with stress responses throughout life. To maintain these adaptations, HSCs rely on maintaining a tightly controlled protein translation rate. However, the mechanism of how HSCs regulate protein translation remains to be fully elucidated. In this study, we investigate the role of transfer RNA (tRNA) m1A58 'writer' proteins TRMT6 and TRMT61A in regulating HSCs function. Trmt6 deletion promoted HSC proliferation through aberrant activation of mTORC1 signaling. TRMT6-deficient HSCs exhibited an impaired self-renewal ability in competitive transplantation assay. Mechanistically, single cell RNA-seq analysis reveals that the mTORC1 signaling pathway is highly upregulated in HSC-enriched cell populations after Trmt6 deletion. m1A-tRNA-seq and Western blot analysis suggest that TRMT6 promotes methylation modification of specific tRNA and expression of TSC1, fine-tuning mTORC1 signaling levels. Furthermore, Pharmacological inhibition of the mTORC1 pathway rescued functional defect in TRMT6-deficient HSCs. To our knowledge, this study is the first to elucidate a mechanism by which TRMT6-TRMT61A complex-mediated tRNA-m1A58 modification regulates HSC homeostasis.

[Advances in mapping analysis of ribonucleic acid modifications through sequencing]

Over 170 chemical modifications have been discovered in various types of ribonucleic acids (RNAs), including messenger RNA (mRNA), ribosomal RNA (rRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), and small nuclear RNA (snRNA). These RNA modifications play crucial roles in a wide range of biological processes such as gene expression regulation, RNA stability maintenance, and protein translation. RNA modifications represent a new dimension of gene expression regulation known as the "epitranscriptome". The discovery of RNA modifications and the relevant writers, erasers, and readers provides an important basis for studies on the dynamic regulation and physiological functions of RNA modifications. Owing to the development of detection technologies for RNA modifications, studies on RNA epitranscriptomes have progressed to the single-base resolution, multilayer, and full-coverage stage. Transcriptome-wide methods help discover new RNA modification sites and are of great importance for elucidating the molecular regulatory mechanisms of epitranscriptomics, exploring the disease associations of RNA modifications, and understanding their clinical applications. The existing RNA modification sequencing technologies can be categorized according to the pretreatment approach and sequencing principle as direct high-throughput sequencing, antibody-enrichment sequencing, enzyme-assisted sequencing, chemical labeling-assisted sequencing, metabolic labeling sequencing, and nanopore sequencing technologies. These methods, as well as studies on the functions of RNA modifications, have greatly expanded our understanding of epitranscriptomics. In this review, we summarize the recent progress in RNA modification detection technologies, focusing on the basic principles, advantages, and limitations of different methods. Direct high-throughput sequencing methods do not require complex RNA pretreatment and allow for the mapping of RNA modifications using conventional RNA sequencing methods. However, only a few RNA modifications can be analyzed by high-throughput sequencing. Antibody enrichment followed by high-throughput sequencing has emerged as a crucial approach for mapping RNA modifications, significantly advancing the understanding of RNA modifications and their regulatory functions in different species. However, the resolution of antibody-enrichment sequencing is limited to approximately 100-200 bp. Although chemical crosslinking techniques can achieve single-base resolution, these methods are often complex, and the specificity of the antibodies used in these methods has raised concerns. In particular, the issue of off-target binding by the antibodies requires urgent attention. Enzyme-assisted sequencing has improved the accuracy of the localization analysis of RNA modifications and enables stoichiometric detection with single-base resolution. However, the enzymes used in this technique show poor reactivity, specificity, and sequence preference. Chemical labeling sequencing has become a widely used approach for profiling RNA modifications, particularly by altering reverse transcription (RT) signatures such as RT stops, misincorporations, and deletions. Chemical-assisted sequencing provides a sequence-independent RNA modification detection strategy that enables the localization of multiple RNA modifications. Additionally, when combined with the biotin-streptavidin affinity method, low-abundance RNA modifications can be enriched and detected. Nevertheless, the specificity of many chemical reactions remains problematic, and the development of specific reaction probes for particular modifications should continue in the future to achieve the precise localization of RNA modifications. As an indirect localization method, metabolic labeling sequencing specifically localizes the sites at which modifying enzymes act, which is of great significance in the study of RNA modification functions. However, this method is limited by the intracellular labeling of RNA and cannot be applied to biological samples such as clinical tissues and blood samples. Nanopore sequencing is a direct RNA-sequencing method that does not require RT or the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). However, challenges in analyzing the data obtained from nanopore sequencing, such as the high rate of false positives, must be resolved. Discussing sequencing analysis methods for various types of RNA modifications is instructive for the future development of novel RNA modification mapping technologies, and will aid studies on the functions of RNA modifications across the entire transcriptome.

Simultaneous Detection of Adenosine-to-Inosine Editing and N6-Methyladenosine at Identical RNA Sites through Deamination-Assisted Reverse Transcription Stalling

Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) editing and N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modifications are pivotal RNA modifications with widespread functional significance in physiological and pathological processes. Although significant effort has been dedicated to developing methodologies for identifying and quantifying these modifications, traditional approaches have often focused on each modification independently, neglecting the potential co-occurrence of A-to-I editing and m6A modifications at the same adenosine residues. This limitation has constrained our understanding of the intricate regulatory mechanisms governing RNA function and the interplay between different types of RNA modifications. To address this gap, we introduced an innovative technique called deamination-assisted reverse transcription stalling (DARTS), specifically designed for the simultaneous quantification of A-to-I editing and m6A at the same RNA sites. DARTS leverages the selective deamination activity of the engineered TadA-TadA8e protein, which converts adenosine residues to inosine, in combination with the unique property of Bst 2.0 DNA polymerase, which stalls when encountering inosine during reverse transcription. This approach enables the accurate quantification of A-to-I editing, m6A, and unmodified adenosine at identical RNA sites. The DARTS method is remarkable for its ability to directly quantify two distinct types of RNA modifications simultaneously, a capability that has remained largely unexplored in the field of RNA biology. By facilitating a comprehensive analysis of the co-occurrence and interaction between A-to-I editing and m6A modifications, DARTS opens new avenues for exploring the complex regulatory networks modulated by different RNA modifications.

Non-Coding RNAs: Regulators of Stress, Ageing, and Developmental Decisions in Yeast?

Cells must change their properties in order to adapt to a constantly changing environment. Most of the cellular sensing and regulatory mechanisms described so far are based on proteins that serve as sensors, signal transducers, and effectors of signalling pathways, resulting in altered cell physiology. In recent years, however, remarkable examples of the critical role of non-coding RNAs in some of these regulatory pathways have been described in various organisms. In this review, we focus on all classes of non-coding RNAs that play regulatory roles during stress response, starvation, and ageing in different yeast species as well as in structured yeast populations. Such regulation can occur, for example, by modulating the amount and functional state of tRNAs, rRNAs, or snRNAs that are directly involved in the processes of translation and splicing. In addition, long non-coding RNAs and microRNA-like molecules are bona fide regulators of the expression of their target genes. Non-coding RNAs thus represent an additional level of cellular regulation that is gradually being uncovered.

AlkB-Facilitated Demethylation Enables Quantitative and Site-Specific Detection of Dual Methylation of Adenosine in RNA

RNA molecules undergo various chemical modifications that play critical roles in a wide range of biological processes. N6,N6-Dimethyladenosine (m6,6A) is a conserved RNA modification and is essential for the processing of rRNA. To gain a deeper understanding of the functions of m6,6A, site-specific and accurate quantification of this modification in RNA is indispensable. In this study, we developed an AlkB-facilitated demethylation (AD-m6,6A) method for the site-specific detection and quantification of m6,6A in RNA. The N6,N6-dimethyl groups in m6,6A can cause reverse transcription to stall at the m6,6A site, resulting in truncated cDNA. However, we found that Escherichia coli AlkB demethylase can effectively demethylate m6,6A in RNA, generating full-length cDNA from AlkB-treated RNA. By quantifying the amount of full-length cDNA produced using quantitative real-time PCR, we were able to achieve site-specific detection and quantification of m6,6A in RNA. Using the AD-m6,6A method, we successfully detected and quantified m6,6A at position 1851 of 18S rRNA and position 937 of mitochondrial 12S rRNA in human cells. Additionally, we found that the level of m6,6A at position 1007 of mitochondrial 12S rRNA was significantly reduced in lung tissues from sleep-deprived mice compared with control mice. Overall, the AD-m6,6A method provides a valuable tool for easy, accurate, quantitative, and site-specific detection of m6,6A in RNA, which can aid in uncovering the functions of m6,6A in human diseases.

Pitfalls in RNA Modification Quantification Using Nucleoside Mass Spectrometry

In recent years, there has been a high interest in researching RNA modifications, as they are involved in many cellular processes and in human diseases. A substantial set of enzymes within the cell, called RNA writers, place RNA modifications selectively and site-specifically. Another set of enzymes, called readers, recognize these modifications which guide the fate of the modified RNA. Although RNA is a transient molecule and RNA modification could be removed by RNA degradation, a subclass of enzymes, called RNA erasers, remove RNA modifications selectively and site-specifically to alter the characteristics of the RNA. The detection of RNA modifications can be done by various methods including second and next generation sequencing but also mass spectrometry. An approach capable of both qualitative and quantitative RNA modification analysis is liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry of enzymatic hydrolysates of RNA into nucleosides. However, for successful detection and quantification, various factors must be considered to avoid biased identification and inaccurate quantification. In this Account, we identify three classes of errors that may distort the analysis. These classes comprise (I) errors related to chemical instabilities, (II) errors revolving around enzymatic hydrolysis to nucleosides, and (III) errors arising from issues with chromatographic separation and/or subsequent mass spectrometric analysis.A prominent example for class 1 is Dimroth rearrangement of m1A to m6A, but class 1 also comprises hydrolytic reactions and reactions with buffer components. Here, we also present the conversion of m3C to m3U under mild alkaline conditions and propose a practical solution to overcome these instabilities. Class 2 errors-such as contaminations in hydrolysis reagents or nuclease specificities-have led to erroneous discoveries of nucleosides in the past and possess the potential for misquantification of nucleosides. Impurities in the samples may also lead to class 3 errors: For instance, issues with chromatographic separation may arise from residual organic solvents, and salt adducts may hamper mass spectrometric quantification. This Account aims to highlight various errors connected to mass spectrometry analysis of nucleosides and presents solutions for how to overcome or circumnavigate those issues. Therefore, the authors anticipate that many scientists, but especially those who plan on doing nucleoside mass spectrometry, will benefit from the collection of data presented in this Account as a raised awareness, toward the variety of potential pitfalls, may further enhance the quality of data.

ALKBH4 is a novel enzyme that promotes translation through modified uridine regulation

Epitranscriptomics studies the mechanisms of acquired RNA modifications. The epitranscriptome is dynamically regulated by specific enzymatic reactions, and the proper execution of these enzymatic RNA modifications regulates a variety of physiological RNA functions. However, the lack of experimental tools, such as antibodies for RNA modification, limits the development of epitranscriptomic research. Furthermore, the regulatory enzymes of many RNA modifications have not yet been identified. Herein, we aimed to identify new molecular mechanisms involved in RNA modification by focusing on the AlkB homolog (ALKBH) family molecules, a family of RNA demethylases. We demonstrated that ALKBH4 interacts with small RNA, regulating the formation and metabolism of the (R)-5-carboxyhydroxymethyl uridine methyl ester. We also found that the reaction of ALKBH4 with small RNA enhances protein translation efficiency in an in vitro assay system. These findings indicate that ALKBH4 is involved in the regulation of uridine modification and expand on the role of tRNA-mediated translation control through ALKBH4.

Single-Base Resolution Detection of N6-Methyladenosine in RNA by Adenosine Deamination Sequencing

N⁶-Methyladenosine (m⁶A) is one of the most abundant and prevalent natural modifications occurring in diverse RNA species. m⁶A plays a wide range of roles in physiological and pathological processes. Revealing the functions of m⁶A relies on the faithful detection of individual m⁶A sites in RNA. However, developing a simple method for the single-base resolution detection of m⁶A is still a challenging task. Herein, we report an adenosine deamination sequencing (AD-seq) technique for the facile detection of m⁶A in RNA at single-base resolution. The AD-seq approach capitalizes on the selective deamination of adenosine, but not m⁶A, by the evolved tRNA adenosine deaminase (TadA) variant of TadA8e or the dimer protein of TadA-TadA8e. In AD-seq, adenosine is deaminated by TadA8e or TadA-TadA8e to form inosine, which pairs with cytidine and is read as guanosine in sequencing. m⁶A resists deamination due to the interference of the methyl group at the N6 position of adenosine. Thus, the m⁶A base pairs with thymine and is still read as adenosine in sequencing. The differential readouts from A and m⁶A in sequencing can achieve the single-base resolution detection of m⁶A in RNA. Application of the proposed AD-seq successfully identified individual m⁶A sites in Escherichia coli 23S rRNA. Taken together, the proposed AD-seq allows simple and cost-effective detection of m⁶A at single-base resolution in RNA, which provides a valuable tool to decipher the functions of m⁶A in RNA.

Cross-talk of RNA modification "writers" describes tumor stemness and microenvironment and guides personalized immunotherapy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

RNA modifications, TME, and cancer stemness play significant roles in tumor development and immunotherapy. The study investigated cross-talk and RNA modification roles in the TME, cancer stemness, and immunotherapy of gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

We applied an unsupervised clustering method to distinguish RNA modification patterns in GC. GSVA and ssGSEA algorithms were applied. The WM_Score model was constructed for evaluating the RNA modification-related subtypes. Also, we conducted an association analysis between the WM_Score and biological and clinical features in GC and explored the WM_Score model's predictive value in immunotherapy.

RESULTS

We identified four RNA modification patterns with diverse survival and TME features. One pattern consistent with the immune-inflamed tumor phenotype showed a better prognosis. Patients in WM_Score high group were related to adverse clinical outcomes, immune suppression, stromal activation, and enhanced cancer stemness, while WM_Score low group showed opposite results. The WM_Score was correlated with genetic, epigenetic alterations, and post-transcriptional modifications in GC. Low WM_Score was related to enhanced efficacy of anti-PD-1/L1 immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

We revealed the cross-talk of four RNA modification types and their functions in GC, providing a scoring system for GC prognosis and personalized immunotherapy predictions.

Engineered APOBEC3C Sequencing Enables Bisulfite-Free and Direct Detection of DNA Methylation at a Single-Base Resolution

DNA methylation (5-methylcytosine, 5mC) is the most important epigenetic modification in mammals. Deciphering the roles of 5mC relies on the quantitative detection of 5mC at the single-base resolution. Bisulfite sequencing (BS-seq) is the most often employed technique for mapping 5mC in DNA. However, bisulfite treatment may cause serious degradation of input DNA due to the harsh reaction conditions. Here, we engineered the human apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing catalytic polypeptide-like 3C (A3C) protein to endow the engineered A3C (eA3C) protein with differential deamination activity toward cytosine and 5mC. By the virtue of the unique property of eA3C, we proposed an engineered A3C sequencing (EAC-seq) method for the bisulfite-free and quantitative mapping of 5mC in DNA at the single-base resolution. In EAC-seq, the eA3C protein can deaminate C but not 5mC, which is employed to differentiate C and 5mC in sequencing. Using the EAC-seq method, we quantitatively detected 5mC in genomic DNA of lung cancer tissue. In contrast to the harsh reaction conditions of BS-seq, which could lead to significant degradation of DNA, the whole procedure of EAC-seq is carried out under mild conditions, thereby preventing DNA damage. Taken together, the EAC-seq approach is bisulfite-free and straightforward, making it an invaluable tool for the quantitative detection of 5mC in limited DNA at the single-base resolution.

Quantitative and site-specific detection of inosine modification in RNA by acrylonitrile labeling-mediated elongation stalling

RNA molecules contain diverse modifications that play crucial roles in a wide variety of biological processes. Inosine is one of the most prevalent modifications in RNA and dysregulation of inosine is correlated with many human diseases. Herein, we established an acrylonitrile labeling-mediated elongation stalling (ALES) method for quantitative and site-specific detection of inosine in RNA from biological samples. In ALES method, inosine is selectively cyanoethylated with acrylonitrile to form N1-cyanoethylinosine (ce1I) through a Michael addition reaction. The N1-cyanoethyl group of ce1I compromises the hydrogen bond between ce1I and other nucleobases, leading to the stalling of reverse transcription at original inosine site. This specific property of stalling at inosine site could be evaluated by subsequent real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). With the proposed ALES method, we found the significantly increased level of inosine at position Chr1:63117284 of Ino80dos RNA of multiple tissues from sleep-deprived mice compared to the control mice. This is the first report on the investigation of inosine modification in sleep-deprived mice, which may open up new direction for deciphering insomnia from RNA modifications. In addition, we found the decreased level of inosine at GluA2 Q/R site (Chr4:157336723) in glioma tissues, indicating the decreased level of inosine at GluA2 Q/R site may serve as potential indicator for the diagnosis of glioma. Taken together, the proposed ALES method is capable of quantitative and site-specific detection of inosine in RNA, which provides a valuable tool to uncover the functions of inosine in human diseases.