A competitive regulatory mechanism discriminates between juxtaposed splice sites and pri-miRNA structures

MicroRNA biogenesis is broadly disrupted by inhibition of the splicing factor SF3B1

In animals, microRNA (miRNA) biogenesis begins with cotranscriptional cleavage of the primary (pri-)miRNA by the Microprocessor complex. Cotranscriptional splicing has been shown to influence Microprocessor cleavage when miRNAs are hosted in introns of protein-coding pri-miRNAs, but the impact of splicing on production of miRNAs hosted in long non-coding (lnc)RNAs is largely unknown. Here, we investigated the role of splicing in the biogenesis of miR-122, an lncRNA-hosted, highly expressed, medically important, liver-specific miRNA. We found that splicing inhibition by the SF3B1 inhibitor pladienolide B (PlaB) led to strong and rapid reduction in transcription of endogenous, but not plasmid-encoded, pri-miR-122, resulting in reduced production of mature miR-122. To allow detection of rapid changes in miRNA biogenesis despite the high stability of mature miRNAs, we used SLAMseq to globally quantify the effects of short-term splicing inhibition on miRNA synthesis. We observed an overall decrease in biogenesis of mature miRNAs following PlaB treatment. Surprisingly, miRNAs hosted in exons and introns were similarly affected. Together, this study provides new insights into the emerging role of splicing in transcription, demonstrating novel biological importance in promotion of miR-122 biogenesis from an lncRNA, and shows that SF3B1 is important for global miRNA biogenesis.

mRNA splicing is modulated by intronic microRNAs

Splicing of transcripts is catalyzed by the spliceosome, a mega-complex consisting of hundreds of proteins and five snRNAs, which employs direct interactions. When U1 snRNA forms high-affinity binding, namely more than eight base pairs, with the 5'SS, the result is usually a suppressing effect on the splicing activity. This likely occurs due to the inefficient unwinding of U1/5'SS base-pairing or other regulatory obstructions. Here, we show in vitro and in patient-derived cell lines that pre-microRNAs can modulate the splicing reaction by interacting with U1 snRNA. This leads to reduced binding affinity to the 5'SS, and hence promotes the inclusion of exons containing 5'SS, despite sequence-based high affinity to U1. Application of the mechanism resulted in correction of the splicing defect in the disease-causing VCAN gene from an individual with Wagner syndrome. This pre-miRNA/U1 interaction can regulate the expression of alternatively spliced exons, thus extending the scope of mechanisms regulating splicing.

IFN-I inducible miR-3614-5p targets ADAR1 isoforms and fine tunes innate immune activation

Regulation of innate immune responses is essential for maintenance of immune homeostasis and development of an appropriate immunity against microbial infection. We show here that miR-3614-5p, product of the TRIM25 host gene, is induced by type I interferon (IFN-I) in several human non-immune and immune cell types, in particular in primary myeloid cells. Studies in HeLa cells showed that miR-3614-5p represses both p110 and p150 ADAR1 and reduces constitutive and IFN-induced A-to-I RNA editing. In line with this, activation of innate sensors and expression of IFN-β and the pro-inflammatory IL-6 are promoted. MiR-3614-5p directly targets ADAR1 transcripts by binding to one specific site in the 3’UTR. Moreover, we could show that endogenous miR-3614-5p is associated with Ago2 and targets ADAR1 in IFN-stimulated cells. Overall, we propose that, by reducing ADAR1, IFN-I-induced miR-3614-5p contributes to lowering the activation threshold of innate sensors. Our findings provide new insights into the role of miR-3614-5p, placing it as a potential fine tuner of dsRNA metabolism, cell homeostasis and innate immunity.

Splice and Dice: Intronic microRNAs, Splicing and Cancer

Introns span only a quarter of the human genome, yet they host around 60% of all known microRNAs. Emerging evidence indicates the adaptive advantage of microRNAs residing within introns is attributed to their complex co-regulation with transcription and alternative splicing of their host genes. Intronic microRNAs are often co-expressed with their host genes, thereby providing functional synergism or antagonism that is exploited or decoupled in cancer. Additionally, intronic microRNA biogenesis and the alternative splicing of host transcript are co-regulated and intertwined. The importance of intronic microRNAs is under-recognized in relation to the pathogenesis of cancer.

Antagonism between splicing and microprocessor complex dictates the serum-induced processing of lnc-MIRHG for efficient cell cycle reentry

Cellular quiescence and cell cycle reentry regulate vital biological processes such as cellular development and tissue homeostasis and are controlled by precise regulation of gene expression. The roles of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) during these processes remain to be elucidated. By performing genome-wide transcriptome analyses, we identify differential expression of several hundreds of lncRNAs, including a significant number of the less-characterized class of microRNA-host-gene (MIRHG) lncRNAs or lnc-MIRHGs, during cellular quiescence and cell cycle reentry in human diploid fibroblasts. We observe that MIR222HG lncRNA displays serum-stimulated RNA processing due to enhanced splicing of the host nascent pri-MIR222HG transcript. The pre-mRNA splicing factor SRSF1 negatively regulates the microprocessor-catalyzed cleavage of pri-miR-222, thereby increasing the cellular pool of the mature MIR222HG Association of SRSF1 to pri-MIR222HG, including to a mini-exon, which partially overlaps with the primary miR-222 precursor, promotes serum-stimulated splicing over microRNA processing of MIR222HG Further, we observe that the increased levels of spliced MIR222HG in serum-stimulated cells promote the cell cycle reentry post quiescence in a microRNA-independent manner. MIR222HG interacts with DNM3OS, another lncRNA whose expression is elevated upon serum-stimulation, and promotes cell cycle reentry. The double-stranded RNA binding protein ILF3/2 complex facilitates MIR222HG:DNM3OS RNP complex assembly, thereby promoting DNM3OS RNA stability. Our study identifies a novel mechanism whereby competition between the splicing and microprocessor machinery modulates the serum-induced RNA processing of MIR222HG, which dictates cell cycle reentry.

One locus with two roles: microRNA-independent functions of microRNA-host-gene locus-encoded long noncoding RNAs

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are RNA transcripts longer than 200 nucleotides that do not code for proteins. LncRNAs play crucial regulatory roles in several biological processes via diverse mechanisms and their aberrant expression is associated with various diseases. LncRNA genes are further subcategorized based on their relative organization in the genome. MicroRNA (miRNA)-host-gene-derived lncRNAs (lnc-MIRHGs) refer to lncRNAs whose genes also harbor miRNAs. There exists crosstalk between the processing of lnc-MIRHGs and the biogenesis of the encoded miRNAs. Although the functions of the encoded miRNAs are usually well understood, whether those lnc-MIRHGs play independent functions are not fully elucidated. Here, we review our current understanding of lnc-MIRHGs, including their biogenesis, function, and mechanism of action, with a focus on discussing the miRNA-independent functions of lnc-MIRHGs, including their involvement in cancer. Our current understanding of lnc-MIRHGs strongly indicates that this class of lncRNAs could play important roles in basic cellular events as well as in diseases. This article is categorized under: Regulatory RNAs/RNAi/Riboswitches > Regulatory RNAs Regulatory RNAs/RNAi/Riboswitches > Biogenesis of Effector Small RNAs.

A Novel ceRNA Regulatory Network Involving the Long Non-Coding Antisense RNA SPACA6P-AS, miR-125a and its mRNA Targets in Hepatocarcinoma Cells

MicroRNAs (miRNA), and more recently long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA), are emerging as a driving force for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), one of the leading causes of cancer-related death. In this work, we investigated a possible RNA regulatory network involving two oncosuppressive miRNAs, miR-125a and let-7e, and a long non-coding antisense RNA, SPACA6P-AS (SP-AS), all transcribed from the same locus, with SP-AS in the opposite direction and thus carrying complementary sequences to the miRNAs. In vitro experiments validated the binding of the miRNAs to SP-AS. Then, the boosting of either the miRNAs or SP-AS levels demonstrated their reciprocal inhibition. In addition, overexpression of SP-AS resulted in a reduced silencing activity of miR-125a and let-7e toward their key oncogenic targets, i.e., Lin28b, MMP11, SIRT7, Zbtb7a, Cyclin D1, CDC25B, HMGA2, that resulted significantly upregulated. Finally, the analysis of 374 HCC samples in comparison to 50 normal liver tissues showed an upregulation of SP-AS and a reverse expression of miR-125a, not observed for let-7e; consistently, miR-125a oncogenic targets were upregulated. Overall, the data depict a novel competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network, ceRNET, whereby miR-125a can regulate the expression of SP-AS, which in turn regulates the miRNA by competing with the binding to the mRNA targets. We speculate that the unbalancing of any network component may contribute to hepatocarcinogenesis.

Microprocessor-dependent processing of splice site overlapping microRNA exons does not result in changes in alternative splicing

MicroRNAs are found throughout the genome and are processed by the microprocessor complex (MPC) from longer precursors. Some precursor miRNAs overlap intron:exon junctions. These splice site overlapping microRNAs (SO-miRNAs) are mostly located in coding genes. It has been intimated, in the rarer examples of SO-miRNAs in noncoding RNAs, that the competition between the spliceosome and the MPC modulates alternative splicing. However, the effect of this overlap on coding transcripts is unknown. Unexpectedly, we show that neither Drosha silencing nor SF3b1 silencing changed the inclusion ratio of SO-miRNA exons. Two SO-miRNAs, located in genes that code for basal membrane proteins, are known to inhibit proliferation in primary keratinocytes. These SO-miRNAs were up-regulated during differentiation and the host mRNAs were down-regulated, but again there was no change in inclusion ratio of the SO-miRNA exons. Interestingly, Drosha silencing increased nascent RNA density, on chromatin, downstream from SO-miRNA exons. Overall our data suggest a novel mechanism for regulating gene expression in which MPC-dependent cleavage of SO-miRNA exons could cause premature transcriptional termination of coding genes rather than affecting alternative splicing.

Emerging roles of DROSHA beyond primary microRNA processing

DROSHA is the catalytic subunit of the Microprocessor complex, which initiates microRNA (miRNA) maturation in the nucleus by recognizing and cleaving hairpin precursors embedded in primary transcripts. However, accumulating evidence suggests that not all hairpin substrates of DROSHA are associated with the generation of functional small RNAs. By targeting those hairpins, DROSHA regulates diverse aspects of RNA metabolism across the transcriptome, serves as a line of defense against the expression of potentially deleterious elements, and permits cell fate determination and differentiation. DROSHA is also versatile in the way that it executes these noncanonical functions, occasionally depending on its RNA-binding activity rather than its catalytic activity. Herein, we discuss the functional and mechanistic diversity of DROSHA beyond the miRNA biogenesis pathway in light of recent findings.

DROSHA targets its own transcript to modulate alternative splicing

The nuclear RNase III enzyme DROSHA interacts with its cofactor DGCR8 to form the Microprocessor complex, which initiates microRNA (miRNA) maturation by cleaving hairpin structures embedded in primary transcripts. Apart from its central role in the biogenesis of miRNAs, DROSHA is also known to recognize and cleave miRNA-like hairpins in a subset of transcripts without apparent small RNA production. Here, we report that the human DROSHA transcript is one such noncanonical target of DROSHA. Mammalian DROSHA genes have evolved a conserved hairpin structure spanning a specific exon-intron junction, which serves as a substrate for the Microprocessor in human cells but not in murine cells. We show that it is this hairpin element that decides whether the overlapping exon is alternatively or constitutively spliced. We further demonstrate that DROSHA promotes skipping of the overlapping exon in human cells independently of its cleavage function. Our findings add to the expanding list of noncanonical DROSHA functions.

Alternative splicing of a viral mirtron differentially affects the expression of other microRNAs from its cluster and of the host transcript

Interplay between alternative splicing and the Microprocessor may have differential effects on the expression of intronic miRNAs organized into clusters. We used a viral model - the LAT long non-coding RNA (LAT lncRNA) of Marek's disease oncogenic herpesvirus (MDV-1), which has the mdv1-miR-M8-M6-M7-M10 cluster embedded in its first intron - to assess the impact of splicing modifications on the biogenesis of each of the miRNAs from the cluster. Drosha silencing and alternative splicing of an extended exon 2 of the LAT lncRNA from a newly identified 3' splice site (SS) at the end of the second miRNA of the cluster showed that mdv1-miR-M6 was a 5'-tailed mirtron. We have thus identified the first 5'-tailed mirtron within a cluster of miRNAs for which alternative splicing is directly associated with differential expression of the other miRNAs of the cluster, with an increase in intronic mdv1-miR-M8 expression and a decrease in expression of the exonic mdv1-miR-M7, and indirectly associated with regulation of the host transcript. According to the alternative 3SS used for the host intron splicing, the mdv1-miR-M6 is processed as a mirtron by the spliceosome, dispatching the other miRNAs of the cluster into intron and exon, or as a canonical miRNA by the Microprocessor complex. The viral mdv1-miR-M6 mirtron is the first mirtron described that can also follow the canonical pathway.

Coupling and coordination in gene expression processes with pre-mRNA splicing

RNA processing is a tightly regulated and highly complex pathway which includes transcription, splicing, editing, transportation, translation and degradation. It has been well-documented that splicing of RNA polymerase II medicated nascent transcripts occurs co-transcriptionally and is functionally coupled to other RNA processing. Recently, increasing experimental evidence indicated that pre-mRNA splicing influences RNA degradation and vice versa. In this review, we summarized the recent findings demonstrating the coupling of these two processes. In addition, we highlighted the importance of splicing in the production of intronic miRNA and circular RNAs, and hence the discovery of the novel mechanisms in the regulation of gene expression.

MicroRNA-34 family expression in bovine gametes and preimplantation embryos

BACKGROUND

Oocyte fertilization and successful embryo implantation are key events marking the onset of pregnancy. In sexually reproducing organisms, embryogenesis begins with the fusion of two haploid gametes, each of which has undergone progressive stages of maturation. In the final stages of oocyte maturation, minimal transcriptional activity is present and regulation of gene expression occurs primarily at the post-transcriptional level. MicroRNAs (miRNA) are potent effectors of post-transcriptional gene silencing and recent evidence demonstrates that the miR-34 family of miRNA are involved in both spermatogenesis and early events of embryogenesis.

METHODS

The profile of miR-34 miRNAs has not been characterized in gametes or embryos of Bos taurus. We therefore used quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) to examine this family of miRNAs: miR-34a, -34b and -34c as well as their precursors in bovine gametes and in vitro produced embryos. Oocytes were aspirated from antral follicles of bovine ovaries, and sperm cells were isolated from semen samples of 10 bulls with unknown fertility status. Immature and in vitro matured oocytes, as well as cleaved embryos, were collected in pools. Gametes, embryos and ovarian and testis tissues were purified for RNA.

RESULTS

All members of the miR-34 family are present in bovine spermatozoa, while only miR-34a and -34c are present in oocytes and cleaved (2-cell) embryos. Mir-34c demonstrates variation among different bulls and is consistently expressed throughout oocyte maturation and in the embryo. The primary transcript of the miR-34b/c bicistron is abundant in the testes and present in ovarian tissue but undetectable in oocytes and in mature spermatozoa.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of these findings suggest that miR-34 miRNAs may be required in developing bovine gametes of both sexes, as well as in embryos, and that primary miR-34b/c processing takes place before the completion of gametogenesis. Individual variation in sperm miR-34 family abundance may offer potential as a biomarker of male bovine fertility.

Intragenic isochores (intrachores) in the platelet phosphofructokinase gene of Passeriform birds

Total GC-content in the platelet phosphofructokinase gene of Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia guttata) is low (37.53±0.51%), while there are short areas (about 300 nucleotides in length) with increased GC-content overlapping its exon 4 and exon 17. GC-content in third codon positions (3GC) of those two exons is equal to 88.42 and 80.00%, respectively, while overall 3GC of the coding region is equal to 49.9%. Similar distribution of GC-content has been found in platelet phosphofructokinase genes of other birds from Passeriformes order. According to the results of phylogenetic analysis, formation of those areas with high G+C started from 91.4 to 47.1millionyears ago, since there are no such peaks of GC-content in homologous genes of other birds and reptiles. There are clusters of transcription factor binding sites in those areas with higher GC-content, as well as microRNA precursors conserved in Zebra Finch and Flycatcher genes. According to our hypothesis those intragenic isochores (intrachores) may be consequences of autonomous microRNA precursor transcription at certain period(s) of embryogenesis and gametogenesis, when the platelet phosphofructokinase gene itself is not expressed. Transcription-associated mutational pressure existing during those periods may cause the increase in rates of AT to GC mutations in those genes which are transcribed.

Drosha promotes splicing of a pre-microRNA-like alternative exon

The ribonuclease III enzyme Drosha has a central role in the biogenesis of microRNA (miRNA) by binding and cleaving hairpin structures in primary RNA transcripts into precursor miRNAs (pre-miRNAs). Many miRNA genes are located within protein-coding host genes and cleaved by Drosha in a manner that is coincident with splicing of introns by the spliceosome. The close proximity of splicing and pre-miRNA biogenesis suggests a potential for co-regulation of miRNA and host gene expression, though this relationship is not completely understood. Here, we describe a cleavage-independent role for Drosha in the splicing of an exon that has a predicted hairpin structure resembling a Drosha substrate. We find that Drosha can cleave the alternatively spliced exon 5 of the eIF4H gene into a pre-miRNA both in vitro and in cells. However, the primary role of Drosha in eIF4H gene expression is to promote the splicing of exon 5. Drosha binds to the exon and enhances splicing in a manner that depends on RNA structure but not on cleavage by Drosha. We conclude that Drosha can function like a splicing enhancer and promote exon inclusion. Our results reveal a new mechanism of alternative splicing regulation involving a cleavage-independent role for Drosha in splicing.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short non-coding RNAs that function in gene silencing and are produced by cleavage from a larger primary RNA transcript through a reaction that is carried out by the Microprocessor. Primary miRNA transcripts are often located within the introns of genes. Thus, both the Microprocessor and the spliceosome, which is responsible for pre-mRNA splicing, interact with the same sequences, though little is known about how these two processes influence each other. In this study, we discovered that the alternatively spliced eIF4H exon 5 is predicted to form an RNA hairpin that resembles a Microprocessor substrate. We found that the Microprocessor can bind and cleave exon 5, which precludes inclusion of the exon in the mRNA. However, we find that Drosha, a component of the Microprocessor, primarily functions to enhance exon 5 splicing both in vitro and in cells, rather than to cleave the RNA. Our results suggest that the Microprocessor has a role in splicing that is distinct from its role in miRNA biogenesis. This Microprocessor activity represents a new function for the complex that may be an important mechanism for regulating alternative splicing.

MicroRNAs and ethanol toxicity

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small nonprotein-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) that have been shown to promote the degradation of target messenger RNAs and inhibit the translation of networks of protein-coding genes to control the development of cells and tissues, and facilitate their adaptation to environmental forces. In this chapter, we will discuss recent data that show that miRNAs are an important component of the epigenetic landscape that regulates the transcription as well as the translation of protein-coding gene networks. We will discuss the evidence that implicates miRNAs in both developmental and adult effects of alcohol consumption. Understanding the interactions of this novel class of ncRNAs with the epigenome will be important for understanding the etiology of alcohol teratology and addiction as well as potential new treatment strategies.