Timely binding of IHF and Fis to DARS2 regulates ATP-DnaA production and replication initiation

Read-through transcription of tRNA underlies the cell cycle-dependent dissociation of IHF from the DnaA-inactivating sequence datA

Timely initiation of chromosomal DNA replication in Escherichia coli is achieved by cell cycle-coordinated regulation of the replication origin, oriC, and the replication initiator, ATP-DnaA. Cellular levels of ATP-DnaA increase and peak at the time for initiation at oriC, after which hydrolysis of DnaA-bound ATP causes those to fall, yielding initiation-inactive ADP-DnaA. This hydrolysis is facilitated by the chromosomal locus datA located downstream of the tRNA-Gly (glyV-X-Y) operon, which possesses a cluster of DnaA-binding sequences and a single binding site (IBS) for the DNA bending protein IHF (integration host factor). While IHF binding activates the datA function and is regulated to occur specifically at post-initiation time, the underlying regulatory mechanisms remain obscure. Here, we demonstrate that datA-IHF binding at pre-initiation time is down-regulated depending on the read-through transcription of datA IBS initiated at the glyV-X-Y promoter. During the cell cycle, the level of read-through transcription, but not promoter activity, fluctuated in a manner inversely related to datA-IHF binding. Transcription from the glyV-X-Y promoter was predominantly interrupted at datA IBS by IHF binding. The terminator/attenuator sequence of the glyV-X-Y operon, as well as DnaA binding within datA overall, contributed to attenuation of transcription upstream of datA IBS, preserving the timely fluctuation of read-through transcription. These findings provide a mechanistic insight of tRNA transcription-dependent datA-IHF regulation, in which an unidentified factor is additionally required for the timely datA-IHF dissociation, and support the significance of datA for controlling the cell cycle progression as a connecting hub of tRNA production and replication initiation.

Cell cycle-coordinated maintenance of the Vibrio bipartite genome

To preserve the integrity of their genome, bacteria rely on several genome maintenance mechanisms that are co-ordinated with the cell cycle. All members of the Vibrio family have a bipartite genome consisting of a primary chromosome (Chr1) homologous to the single chromosome of other bacteria such as Escherichia coli and a secondary chromosome (Chr2) acquired by a common ancestor as a plasmid. In this review, we present our current understanding of genome maintenance in Vibrio cholerae, which is the best-studied model for bacteria with multi-partite genomes. After a brief overview on the diversity of Vibrio genomic architecture, we describe the specific, common, and co-ordinated mechanisms that control the replication and segregation of the two chromosomes of V. cholerae. Particular attention is given to the unique checkpoint mechanism that synchronizes Chr1 and Chr2 replication.

The heparin-binding hemagglutinin protein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a nucleoid-associated protein

Nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs) regulate multiple cellular processes such as gene expression, virulence, and dormancy throughout bacterial species. NAPs help in the survival and adaptation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) within the host. Fourteen NAPs have been identified in Escherichia coli; however, only seven NAPs are documented in Mtb. Given its complex lifestyle, it is reasonable to assume that Mtb would encode for more NAPs. Using bioinformatics tools and biochemical experiments, we have identified the heparin-binding hemagglutinin (HbhA) protein of Mtb as a novel sequence-independent DNA-binding protein which has previously been characterized as an adhesion molecule required for extrapulmonary dissemination. Deleting the carboxy-terminal domain of HbhA resulted in a complete loss of its DNA-binding activity. Atomic force microscopy showed HbhA-mediated architectural modulations in the DNA, which may play a regulatory role in transcription and genome organization. Our results showed that HbhA colocalizes with the nucleoid region of Mtb. Transcriptomics analyses of a hbhA KO strain revealed that it regulates the expression of ∼36% of total and ∼29% of essential genes. Deletion of hbhA resulted in the upregulation of ∼73% of all differentially expressed genes, belonging to multiple pathways suggesting it to be a global repressor. The results show that HbhA is a nonessential NAP regulating gene expression globally and acting as a plausible transcriptional repressor.

The roles of nucleoid-associated proteins and topoisomerases in chromosome structure, strand segregation, and the generation of phenotypic heterogeneity in bacteria

How to adapt to a changing environment is a fundamental, recurrent problem confronting cells. One solution is for cells to organize their constituents into a limited number of spatially extended, functionally relevant, macromolecular assemblies or hyperstructures, and then to segregate these hyperstructures asymmetrically into daughter cells. This asymmetric segregation becomes a particularly powerful way of generating a coherent phenotypic diversity when the segregation of certain hyperstructures is with only one of the parental DNA strands and when this pattern of segregation continues over successive generations. Candidate hyperstructures for such asymmetric segregation in prokaryotes include those containing the nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs) and the topoisomerases. Another solution to the problem of creating a coherent phenotypic diversity is by creating a growth-environment-dependent gradient of supercoiling generated along the replication origin-to-terminus axis of the bacterial chromosome. This gradient is modulated by transcription, NAPs, and topoisomerases. Here, we focus primarily on two topoisomerases, TopoIV and DNA gyrase in Escherichia coli, on three of its NAPs (H-NS, HU, and IHF), and on the single-stranded binding protein, SSB. We propose that the combination of supercoiling-gradient-dependent and strand-segregation-dependent topoisomerase activities result in significant differences in the supercoiling of daughter chromosomes, and hence in the phenotypes of daughter cells.

Open Questions about the Roles of DnaA, Related Proteins, and Hyperstructure Dynamics in the Cell Cycle

The DnaA protein has long been considered to play the key role in the initiation of chromosome replication in modern bacteria. Many questions about this role, however, remain unanswered. Here, we raise these questions within a framework based on the dynamics of hyperstructures, alias large assemblies of molecules and macromolecules that perform a function. In these dynamics, hyperstructures can (1) emit and receive signals or (2) fuse and separate from one another. We ask whether the DnaA-based initiation hyperstructure acts as a logic gate receiving information from the membrane, the chromosome, and metabolism to trigger replication; we try to phrase some of these questions in terms of DNA supercoiling, strand opening, glycolytic enzymes, SeqA, ribonucleotide reductase, the macromolecular synthesis operon, post-translational modifications, and metabolic pools. Finally, we ask whether, underpinning the regulation of the cell cycle, there is a physico-chemical clock inherited from the first protocells, and whether this clock emits a single signal that triggers both chromosome replication and cell division.

Bacterial Replication Initiation as Precision Control by Protein Counting

Balanced biosynthesis is the hallmark of bacterial cell physiology, where the concentrations of stable proteins remain steady. However, this poses a conceptual challenge to modeling the cell-cycle and cell-size controls in bacteria, as prevailing concentration-based eukaryote models are not directly applicable. In this study, we revisit and significantly extend the initiator-titration model, proposed 30 years ago, and we explain how bacteria precisely and robustly control replication initiation based on the mechanism of protein copy-number sensing. Using a mean-field approach, we first derive an analytical expression of the cell size at initiation based on three biological mechanistic control parameters for an extended initiator-titration model. We also study the stability of our model analytically and show that initiation can become unstable in multifork replication conditions. Using simulations, we further show that the presence of the conversion between active and inactive initiator protein forms significantly represses initiation instability. Importantly, the two-step Poisson process set by the initiator titration step results in significantly improved initiation synchrony with C V ~ 1 / N scaling rather than the standard 1 / N scaling in the Poisson process, where N is the total number of initiators required for initiation. Our results answer two long-standing questions in replication initiation: (i) Why do bacteria produce almost two orders of magnitude more DnaA, the master initiator proteins, than required for initiation? (ii) Why does DnaA exist in active (DnaA-ATP) and inactive (DnaA-ADP) forms if only the active form is competent for initiation? The mechanism presented in this work provides a satisfying general solution to how the cell can achieve precision control without sensing protein concentrations, with broad implications from evolution to the design of synthetic cells.

IHF and Fis as Escherichia coli Cell Cycle Regulators: Activation of the Replication Origin oriC and the Regulatory Cycle of the DnaA Initiator

This review summarizes current knowledge about the mechanisms of timely binding and dissociation of two nucleoid proteins, IHF and Fis, which play fundamental roles in the initiation of chromosomal DNA replication in Escherichia coli. Replication is initiated from a unique replication origin called oriC and is tightly regulated so that it occurs only once per cell cycle. The timing of replication initiation at oriC is rigidly controlled by the timely binding of the initiator protein DnaA and IHF to oriC. The first part of this review presents up-to-date knowledge about the timely stabilization of oriC-IHF binding at oriC during replication initiation. Recent advances in our understanding of the genome-wide profile of cell cycle-coordinated IHF binding have revealed the oriC-specific stabilization of IHF binding by ATP-DnaA oligomers at oriC and by an initiation-specific IHF binding consensus sequence at oriC. The second part of this review summarizes the mechanism of the timely regulation of DnaA activity via the chromosomal loci DARS2 (DnaA-reactivating sequence 2) and datA. The timing of replication initiation at oriC is controlled predominantly by the phosphorylated form of the adenosine nucleotide bound to DnaA, i.e., ATP-DnaA, but not ADP-ADP, is competent for initiation. Before initiation, DARS2 increases the level of ATP-DnaA by stimulating the exchange of ADP for ATP on DnaA. This DARS2 function is activated by the site-specific and timely binding of both IHF and Fis within DARS2. After initiation, another chromosomal locus, datA, which inactivates ATP-DnaA by stimulating ATP hydrolysis, is activated by the timely binding of IHF. A recent study has shown that ATP-DnaA oligomers formed at DARS2-Fis binding sites competitively dissociate Fis via negative feedback, whereas IHF regulation at DARS2 and datA still remains to be investigated. This review summarizes the current knowledge about the specific role of IHF and Fis in the regulation of replication initiation and proposes a mechanism for the regulation of timely IHF binding and dissociation at DARS2 and datA.

Single-stranded DNA recruitment mechanism in replication origin unwinding by DnaA initiator protein and HU, an evolutionary ubiquitous nucleoid protein

The Escherichia coli replication origin oriC contains the initiator ATP-DnaA-Oligomerization Region (DOR) and its flanking duplex unwinding element (DUE). In the Left-DOR subregion, ATP-DnaA forms a pentamer by binding to R1, R5M and three other DnaA boxes. The DNA-bending protein IHF binds sequence-specifically to the interspace between R1 and R5M boxes, promoting DUE unwinding, which is sustained predominantly by binding of R1/R5M-bound DnaAs to the single-stranded DUE (ssDUE). The present study describes DUE unwinding mechanisms promoted by DnaA and IHF-structural homolog HU, a ubiquitous protein in eubacterial species that binds DNA sequence-non-specifically, preferring bent DNA. Similar to IHF, HU promoted DUE unwinding dependent on ssDUE binding of R1/R5M-bound DnaAs. Unlike IHF, HU strictly required R1/R5M-bound DnaAs and interactions between the two DnaAs. Notably, HU site-specifically bound the R1-R5M interspace in a manner stimulated by ATP-DnaA and ssDUE. These findings suggest a model that interactions between the two DnaAs trigger DNA bending within the R1/R5M-interspace and initial DUE unwinding, which promotes site-specific HU binding that stabilizes the overall complex and DUE unwinding. Moreover, HU site-specifically bound the replication origin of the ancestral bacterium Thermotoga maritima depending on the cognate ATP-DnaA. The ssDUE recruitment mechanism could be evolutionarily conserved in eubacteria.

Replication initiation in bacteria: precision control based on protein counting

Balanced biosynthesis is the hallmark of bacterial cell physiology, where the concentrations of stable proteins remain steady. However, this poses a conceptual challenge to modeling the cell-cycle and cell-size controls in bacteria, as prevailing concentration-based eukaryote models are not directly applicable. In this study, we revisit and significantly extend the initiator-titration model, proposed thirty years ago, and explain how bacteria precisely and robustly control replication initiation based on the mechanism of protein copy-number sensing. Using a mean-field approach, we first derive an analytical expression of the cell size at initiation based on three biological mechanistic control parameters for an extended initiator-titration model. We also study the stability of our model analytically and show that initiation can become unstable in multifork replication conditions. Using simulations, we further show that the presence of the conversion between active and inactive initiator protein forms significantly represses initiation instability. Importantly, the two-step Poisson process set by the initiator titration step results in significantly improved initiation synchrony with C V ~ 1 / N scaling rather than the standard 1 / N scaling in the Poisson process, where N is the total number of initiators required for initiation. Our results answer two long-standing questions in replication initiation: (1) Why do bacteria produce almost two orders of magnitude more DnaA, the master initiator proteins, than required for initiation? (2) Why does DnaA exist in active (DnaA-ATP) and inactive (DnaA-ADP) forms if only the active form is competent for initiation? The mechanism presented in this work provides a satisfying general solution to how the cell can achieve precision control without sensing protein concentrations, with broad implications from evolution to the design of synthetic cells.

Diverse Mechanisms of Helicase Loading during DNA Replication Initiation in Bacteria

Initiation of DNA replication is required for cell viability and passage of genetic information to the next generation. Studies in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis have established ATPases associated with diverse cellular activities (AAA+) as essential proteins required for loading of the replicative helicase at replication origins. AAA+ ATPases DnaC in E. coli and DnaI in B. subtilis have long been considered the paradigm for helicase loading during replication in bacteria. Recently, it has become increasingly clear that most bacteria lack DnaC/DnaI homologs. Instead, most bacteria express a protein homologous to the newly described DciA (dnaC/dnaI antecedent) protein. DciA is not an ATPase, and yet it serves as a helicase operator, providing a function analogous to that of DnaC and DnaI across diverse bacterial species. The recent discovery of DciA and of other alternative mechanisms of helicase loading in bacteria has changed our understanding of DNA replication initiation. In this review, we highlight recent discoveries, detailing what is currently known about the replicative helicase loading process across bacterial species, and we discuss the critical questions that remain to be investigated.

Robust replication initiation from coupled homeostatic mechanisms

The bacterium Escherichia coli initiates replication once per cell cycle at a precise volume per origin and adds an on average constant volume between successive initiation events, independent of the initiation size. Yet, a molecular model that can explain these observations has been lacking. Experiments indicate that E. coli controls replication initiation via titration and activation of the initiator protein DnaA. Here, we study by mathematical modelling how these two mechanisms interact to generate robust replication-initiation cycles. We first show that a mechanism solely based on titration generates stable replication cycles at low growth rates, but inevitably causes premature reinitiation events at higher growth rates. In this regime, the DnaA activation switch becomes essential for stable replication initiation. Conversely, while the activation switch alone yields robust rhythms at high growth rates, titration can strongly enhance the stability of the switch at low growth rates. Our analysis thus predicts that both mechanisms together drive robust replication cycles at all growth rates. In addition, it reveals how an origin-density sensor yields adder correlations.

Negative feedback for DARS2-Fis complex by ATP-DnaA supports the cell cycle-coordinated regulation for chromosome replication

In Escherichia coli, the replication initiator DnaA oscillates between an ATP- and an ADP-bound state in a cell cycle-dependent manner, supporting regulation for chromosome replication. ATP-DnaA cooperatively assembles on the replication origin using clusters of low-affinity DnaA-binding sites. After initiation, DnaA-bound ATP is hydrolyzed, producing initiation-inactive ADP-DnaA. For the next round of initiation, ADP-DnaA binds to the chromosomal locus DARS2, which promotes the release of ADP, yielding the apo-DnaA to regain the initiation activity through ATP binding. This DnaA reactivation by DARS2 depends on site-specific binding of IHF (integration host factor) and Fis proteins and IHF binding to DARS2 occurs specifically during pre-initiation. Here, we reveal that Fis binds to an essential region in DARS2 specifically during pre-initiation. Further analyses demonstrate that ATP-DnaA, but not ADP-DnaA, oligomerizes on a cluster of low-affinity DnaA-binding sites overlapping the Fis-binding region, which competitively inhibits Fis binding and hence the DARS2 activity. DiaA (DnaA initiator-associating protein) stimulating ATP-DnaA assembly enhances the dissociation of Fis. These observations lead to a negative feedback model where the activity of DARS2 is repressed around the time of initiation by the elevated ATP-DnaA level and is stimulated following initiation when the ATP-DnaA level is reduced.

The coordinated replication of Vibrio cholerae's two chromosomes required the acquisition of a unique domain by the RctB initiator

Vibrio cholerae, the pathogenic bacterium that causes cholera, has two chromosomes (Chr1, Chr2) that replicate in a well-orchestrated sequence. Chr2 initiation is triggered only after the replication of the crtS site on Chr1. The initiator of Chr2 replication, RctB, displays activities corresponding with its different binding sites: initiator at the iteron sites, repressor at the 39m sites, and trigger at the crtS site. The mechanism by which RctB relays the signal to initiate Chr2 replication from crtS is not well-understood. In this study, we provide new insights into how Chr2 replication initiation is regulated by crtS via RctB. We show that crtS (on Chr1) acts as an anti-inhibitory site by preventing 39m sites (on Chr2) from repressing initiation. The competition between these two sites for RctB binding is explained by the fact that RctB interacts with crtS and 39m via the same DNA-binding surface. We further show that the extreme C-terminal tail of RctB, essential for RctB self-interaction, is crucial for the control exerted by crtS. This subregion of RctB is conserved in all Vibrio, but absent in other Rep-like initiators. Hence, the coordinated replication of both chromosomes likely results from the acquisition of this unique domain by RctB.

Blocking, Bending, and Binding: Regulation of Initiation of Chromosome Replication During the Escherichia coli Cell Cycle by Transcriptional Modulators That Interact With Origin DNA

Genome duplication is a critical event in the reproduction cycle of every cell. Because all daughter cells must inherit a complete genome, chromosome replication is tightly regulated, with multiple mechanisms focused on controlling when chromosome replication begins during the cell cycle. In bacteria, chromosome duplication starts when nucleoprotein complexes, termed orisomes, unwind replication origin (oriC) DNA and recruit proteins needed to build new replication forks. Functional orisomes comprise the conserved initiator protein, DnaA, bound to a set of high and low affinity recognition sites in oriC. Orisomes must be assembled each cell cycle. In Escherichia coli, the organism in which orisome assembly has been most thoroughly examined, the process starts with DnaA binding to high affinity sites after chromosome duplication is initiated, and orisome assembly is completed immediately before the next initiation event, when DnaA interacts with oriC’s lower affinity sites, coincident with origin unwinding. A host of regulators, including several transcriptional modulators, targets low affinity DnaA-oriC interactions, exerting their effects by DNA bending, blocking access to recognition sites, and/or facilitating binding of DnaA to both DNA and itself. In this review, we focus on orisome assembly in E. coli. We identify three known transcriptional modulators, SeqA, Fis (factor for inversion stimulation), and IHF (integration host factor), that are not essential for initiation, but which interact directly with E. coli oriC to regulate orisome assembly and replication initiation timing. These regulators function by blocking sites (SeqA) and bending oriC DNA (Fis and IHF) to inhibit or facilitate cooperative low affinity DnaA binding. We also examine how the growth rate regulation of Fis levels might modulate IHF and DnaA binding to oriC under a variety of nutritional conditions. Combined, the regulatory mechanisms mediated by transcriptional modulators help ensure that at all growth rates, bacterial chromosome replication begins once, and only once, per cell cycle.

Whole-Genome Analysis Reveals That the Nucleoid Protein IHF Predominantly Binds to the Replication Origin oriC Specifically at the Time of Initiation

The structure and function of bacterial chromosomes are dynamically regulated by a wide variety of nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs) and DNA superstructures, such as DNA supercoiling. In Escherichia coli, integration host factor (IHF), a NAP, binds to specific transcription promoters and regulatory DNA elements of DNA replication such as the replication origin oriC: binding to these elements depends on the cell cycle but underlying mechanisms are unknown. In this study, we combined GeF-seq (genome footprinting with high-throughput sequencing) with synchronization of the E. coli cell cycle to determine the genome-wide, cell cycle-dependent binding of IHF with base-pair resolution. The GeF-seq results in this study were qualified enough to analyze genomic IHF binding sites (e.g., oriC and the transcriptional promoters of ilvG and osmY) except some of the known sites. Unexpectedly, we found that before replication initiation, oriC was a predominant site for stable IHF binding, whereas all other loci exhibited reduced IHF binding. To reveal the specific mechanism of stable oriC–IHF binding, we inserted a truncated oriC sequence in the terC (replication terminus) locus of the genome. Before replication initiation, stable IHF binding was detected even at this additional oriC site, dependent on the specific DnaA-binding sequence DnaA box R1 within the site. DnaA oligomers formed on oriC might protect the oriC–IHF complex from IHF dissociation. After replication initiation, IHF rapidly dissociated from oriC, and IHF binding to other sites was sustained or stimulated. In addition, we identified a novel locus associated with cell cycle-dependent IHF binding. These findings provide mechanistic insight into IHF binding and dissociation in the genome.

Arresting chromosome replication upon energy starvation in Escherichia coli

Most organisms possess several cell cycle checkpoints to preserve genome stability in periods of stress. Upon starvation, the absence of chromosomal duplication in the bacterium Escherichia coli is ensured by holding off commencement of replication. During normal growth, accumulation of the initiator protein DnaA along with cell cycle changes in its activity, ensure that DNA replication starts only once per cell cycle. Upon nutrient starvation, the prevailing model is that an arrest in DnaA protein synthesis is responsible for the absence of initiation. Recent indications now suggest that DnaA degradation may also play a role. Here we comment on the implications of this potential new layer of regulation.

Membrane Stress Caused by Unprocessed Outer Membrane Lipoprotein Intermediate Pro-Lpp Affects DnaA and Fis-Dependent Growth

In Escherichia coli, repression of phosphatidylglycerol synthase A gene (pgsA) lowers the levels of membrane acidic phospholipids, particularly phosphatidylglycerol (PG), causing growth-arrested phenotype. The interrupted synthesis of PG is known to be associated with concomitant reduction of chromosomal content and cell mass, in addition to accumulation of unprocessed outer membrane lipoprotein intermediate, pro-Lpp, at the inner membrane. However, whether a linkage exists between the two altered-membrane outcomes remains unknown. Previously, it has been shown that pgsA⁺ cells overexpressing mutant Lpp(C21G) protein have growth defects similar to those caused by the unprocessed pro-Lpp intermediate in cells lacking PG. Here, we found that the ectopic expression of DnaA(L366K) or deletion of fis (encoding Factor for Inversion Stimulation) permits growth of cells that otherwise would be arrested for growth due to accumulated Lpp(C21G). The DnaA(L366K)-mediated restoration of growth occurs by reduced expression of Lpp(C21G) via a σ^E-dependent small-regulatory RNA (sRNA), MicL-S. In contrast, restoration of growth via fis deletion is only partially dependent on the MicL-S pathway; deletion of fis also rescues Lpp(C21G) growth arrest in cells lacking physiological levels of PG and cardiolipin (CL), independently of MicL-S. Our results suggest a close link between the physiological state of the bacterial cell membrane and DnaA- and Fis-dependent growth.

The nucleoid-associated protein IHF acts as a 'transcriptional domainin' protein coordinating the bacterial virulence traits with global transcription

Bacterial pathogenic growth requires a swift coordination of pathogenicity function with various kinds of environmental stress encountered in the course of host infection. Among the factors critical for bacterial adaptation are changes of DNA topology and binding effects of nucleoid-associated proteins transducing the environmental signals to the chromosome and coordinating the global transcriptional response to stress. In this study, we use the model phytopathogen Dickeya dadantii to analyse the organisation of transcription by the nucleoid-associated heterodimeric protein IHF. We inactivated the IHFα subunit of IHF thus precluding the IHFαβ heterodimer formation and determined both phenotypic effects of ihfA mutation on D. dadantii virulence and the transcriptional response under various conditions of growth. We show that ihfA mutation reorganises the genomic expression by modulating the distribution of chromosomal DNA supercoils at different length scales, thus affecting many virulence genes involved in both symptomatic and asymptomatic phases of infection, including those required for pectin catabolism. Altogether, we propose that IHF heterodimer is a 'transcriptional domainin' protein, the lack of which impairs the spatiotemporal organisation of transcriptional stress-response domains harbouring various virulence traits, thus abrogating the pathogenicity of D. dadantii.

Vital insights into prokaryotic genome compaction by nucleoid-associated protein (NAP) and illustration of DNA flexure angles at single-molecule resolution

Integration Host Factor (IHF) is a heterodimeric site-specific nucleoid-associated protein (NAP), well known for its DNA bending ability. Although the IHF induced bending states of DNA have been captured by both X-ray Crystallography and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), the range of flexibility and degree of heterogeneity in terms of quantitative analysis of the nucleoprotein complex has largely remained unexplored. Binding of IHF leads to introduction of two kinks in the dsDNA that allowed us to come up with a quadrilateral model. The findings have further been extended by calculating the angles of flexibility, that gives the idea of the degree of dynamicity of the nucleoprotein complex. We have monitored and compared the trajectories of the conformational dynamics of a dsDNA upon binding of wild-type (wt) and single-chain (sc) IHF at millisecond resolution through single-molecule FRET (smFRET). Our findings reveal that the nucleoprotein complex exists in a 'Slacked-Dynamic' state throughout the observation window where many of them have switched between multiple 'Wobbling States' in the course of attainment of packaged form. This study opens up an opportunity to improve the understanding of the functions of other nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs) by complementing the previous detailed atomic-level structural analysis, which eventually will allow accessibility towards a better hypothesis.

Cell Size Is Coordinated with Cell Cycle by Regulating Initiator Protein DnaA in E. coli

Sixty years ago, bacterial cell size was found to be an exponential function of growth rate. Fifty years ago, a more general relationship was proposed, in which cell mass was equal to the initiation mass multiplied by 2 to the power of the ratio of the total time of C and D periods to the doubling time. This relationship has recently been experimentally confirmed by perturbing doubling time, C period, D period, or initiation mass. However, the underlying molecular mechanism remains unclear. Here, we developed a theoretical model for initiator protein DnaA mediating DNA replication initiation in Escherichia coli. We introduced an initiation probability function for competitive binding of DnaA-ATP and DnaA-ADP at oriC. We established a kinetic description of regulatory processes (e.g., expression regulation, titration, inactivation, and reactivation) of DnaA. Cell size as a spatial constraint also participates in the regulation of DnaA. By simulating DnaA kinetics, we obtained a regular DnaA oscillation coordinated with cell cycle and a converged cell size that matches replication initiation frequency to the growth rate. The relationship between the simulated cell size and growth rate, C period, D period, or initiation mass reproduces experimental results. The model also predicts how DnaA number and initiation mass vary with perturbation parameters, comparable with experimental data. The results suggest that 1) when growth rate, C period, or D period changes, the regulation of DnaA determines the invariance of initiation mass; 2) ppGpp inhibition of replication initiation may be important for the growth rate independence of initiation mass because three possible mechanisms therein produce different DnaA dynamics, which is experimentally verifiable; and 3) perturbation of some DnaA regulatory process causes a changing initiation mass or even an abnormal cell cycle. This study may provide clues for concerted control of cell size and cell cycle in synthetic biology.

DNA and Polyphosphate in Directed Proteolysis for DNA Replication Control

The strict control of bacterial cell proliferation by proteolysis is vital to coordinate cell cycle processes and to adapt to environmental changes. ATP-dependent proteases of the AAA + family are molecular machineries that contribute to cellular proteostasis. Their activity is important to control the level of various proteins, including those that are essential for the regulation of DNA replication. Since the process of proteolysis is irreversible, the protease activity must be tightly regulated and directed toward a specific substrate at the exact time and space in a cell. In our mini review, we discuss the impact of phosphate-containing molecules like DNA and inorganic polyphosphate (PolyP), accumulated during stress, on protease activities. We describe how the directed proteolysis of essential replication proteins contributes to the regulation of DNA replication under normal and stress conditions in bacteria.

Network Rewiring: Physiological Consequences of Reciprocally Exchanging the Physical Locations and Growth-Phase-Dependent Expression Patterns of the Salmonella fis and dps Genes

We assessed the impact on Salmonella physiology of reciprocally translocating the genes encoding the Fis and Dps nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs) and of inverting their growth-phase production patterns such that Fis was produced in stationary phase (like Dps) and Dps was produced in exponential phase (like Fis). Changes to peak binding of Fis were detected by ChIP-seq on the chromosome, as were widespread impacts on the transcriptome, especially when Fis production mimicked Dps production. Virulence gene expression and the expression of a virulence phenotype were altered. Overall, these radical changes to NAP gene expression were well tolerated, revealing the robust and well-buffered nature of global gene regulation networks in the bacterium.

The Fis nucleoid-associated protein controls the expression of a large and diverse regulon of genes in Gram-negative bacteria. Fis production is normally maximal in bacteria during the early exponential phase of batch culture growth, becoming almost undetectable by the onset of stationary phase. We tested the effect on the Fis regulatory network in Salmonella of moving the complete fis gene from its usual location near the origin of chromosomal replication to the position normally occupied by the dps gene in the right macrodomain of the chromosome, and vice versa, creating the gene exchange (GX) strain. In a parallel experiment, we tested the effect of rewiring the Fis regulatory network by placing the fis open reading frame under the control of the stationary-phase-activated dps promoter at the dps genetic location within the right macrodomain, and vice versa, creating the open reading frame exchange (OX) strain. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) was used to measure global Fis protein binding levels and to determine gene expression patterns. Strain GX showed few changes compared with the wild type, although we did detect increased Fis binding at Ter, accompanied by reduced binding at Ori. Strain OX displayed a more pronounced version of this distorted Fis protein-binding pattern together with numerous alterations in the expression of genes in the Fis regulon. OX, but not GX, had a reduced ability to infect cultured mammalian cells. These findings illustrate the inherent robustness of the Fis regulatory network with respect to the effects of rewiring based on gene repositioning alone and emphasize the importance of fis expression signals in phenotypic determination.

A novel mode of DnaA-DnaA interaction promotes ADP dissociation for reactivation of replication initiation activity

ATP-DnaA is temporally increased to initiate replication during the cell cycle. Two chromosomal loci, DARS (DnaA-reactivating sequences) 1 and 2, promote ATP-DnaA production by nucleotide exchange of ADP-DnaA for timely initiation. ADP-DnaA complexes are constructed on DARS1 and DARS2, bearing a cluster of three DnaA-binding sequences (DnaA boxes I−III), promoting ADP dissociation. Although DnaA has an AAA+ domain, which ordinarily directs construction of oligomers in a head-to-tail manner, DnaA boxes I and II are oriented oppositely. In this study, we constructed a structural model of a head-to-head dimer of DnaA AAA+ domains, and analyzed residues residing on the interface of the model dimer. Gln208 was specifically required for DARS-dependent ADP dissociation in vitro, and in vivo analysis yielded consistent results. Additionally, ADP release from DnaA protomers bound to DnaA boxes I and II was dependent on Gln208 of the DnaA protomers, and DnaA box III-bound DnaA did not release ADP nor require Gln208 for ADP dissociation by DARS–DnaA complexes. Based on these and other findings, we propose a model for DARS–DnaA complex dynamics during ADP dissociation, and provide novel insight into the regulatory mechanisms of DnaA and the interaction modes of AAA+ domains.

Regulation of replication initiation: lessons from Caulobacter crescentus

Chromosome replication is a fundamental process in all domains of life. To accurately transmit genetic material to offspring, the initiation of chromosome replication is tightly regulated to ensure that it occurs only once in each cell division cycle. In the model bacterium Caulobacter crescentus, the CtrA response regulator inhibits the origin of replication at the pre-replication stage. Inactivation of CtrA permits the universal DnaA initiator to form an initiation complex at the origin, leading to replication initiation. Subsequently, the initiation complex is inactivated to prevent extra initiation. Whereas DNA replication occurs periodically in exponentially growing cells, replication initiation is blocked under various stress conditions to halt cell cycle progression until the normal condition is restored or the cells adapt to the stress. Thus, regulating the initiation complex plays an important role in not only driving cell cycle progression, but also maintaining cell integrity under stress. Multiple regulatory signaling pathways controlling CtrA and DnaA have been identified and recent studies have advanced our knowledge of the underlying mechanistic and molecular processes. This review focuses on how bacterial cells control replication initiation, highlighting the latest findings that have emerged from studies in C. crescentus.

Endogenous and Foreign Nucleoid-Associated Proteins of Bacteria: Occurrence, Interactions and Effects on Mobile Genetic Elements and Host's Biology

Mobile Genetic Elements (MGEs) are mosaics of functional gene modules of diverse evolutionary origin and are generally divergent from the hosts´ genetic background. Existing biases in base composition and codon usage of these elements` genes impose transcription and translation limitations that may affect the physical and regulatory integration of MGEs in new hosts. Stable appropriation of the foreign DNA depends on a number of host factors among which are the Nucleoid-Associated Proteins (NAPs). These small, basic, highly abundant proteins bind and bend DNA, altering its topology and folding, thereby affecting all known essential DNA metabolism related processes. Both chromosomally- (endogenous) and MGE- (foreign) encoded NAPs have been shown to exist in bacteria. While the role of host-encoded NAPs in xenogeneic silencing of both episomal (plasmids) and integrative MGEs (pathogenicity islands and prophages) is well acknowledged, less is known about the role of MGE-encoded NAPs in the foreign elements biology or their influence on the host's chromosome expression dynamics. Here we review existing literature on the topic, present examples on the positive and negative effects that endogenous and foreign NAPs exert on global transcriptional gene expression, MGE integrative and excisive recombination dynamics, persistence and transfer to suitable hosts and discuss the nature and relevance of synergistic and antagonizing higher order interactions between diverse types of NAPs.

Escherichia coli CrfC Protein, a Nucleoid Partition Factor, Localizes to Nucleoid Poles via the Activities of Specific Nucleoid-Associated Proteins

The Escherichia coli CrfC protein is an important regulator of nucleoid positioning and equipartition. Previously we revealed that CrfC homo-oligomers bind the clamp, a DNA-binding subunit of the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme, promoting colocalization of the sister replication forks, which ensures the nucleoid equipartition. In addition, CrfC localizes at the cell pole-proximal loci via an unknown mechanism. Here, we demonstrate that CrfC localizes to the distinct subnucleoid structures termed nucleoid poles (the cell pole-proximal nucleoid-edges) even in elongated cells as well as in wild-type cells. Systematic analysis of the nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs) and related proteins revealed that HU, the most abundant NAP, and SlmA, the nucleoid occlusion factor regulating the localization of cell division apparatus, promote the specific localization of CrfC foci. When the replication initiator DnaA was inactivated, SlmA and HU were required for formation of CrfC foci. In contrast, when the replication initiation was inhibited with a specific mutant of the helicase-loader DnaC, CrfC foci were sustained independently of SlmA and HU. H-NS, which forms clusters on AT-rich DNA regions, promotes formation of CrfC foci as well as transcriptional regulation of crfC. In addition, MukB, the chromosomal structure mainetanice protein, and SeqA, a hemimethylated nascent DNA region-binding protein, moderately stimulated formation of CrfC foci. However, IHF, a structural homolog of HU, MatP, the replication terminus-binding protein, Dps, a stress-response factor, and FtsZ, an SlmA-interacting factor in cell division apparatus, little or only slightly affected CrfC foci formation and localization. Taken together, these findings suggest a novel and unique mechanism that CrfC localizes to the nucleoid poles in two steps, assembly and recruitment, dependent upon HU, MukB, SeqA, and SlmA, which is stimulated directly or indirectly by H-NS and DnaA. These factors might concordantly affect specific nucleoid substructures. Also, these nucleoid dynamics might be significant in the role for CrfC in chromosome partition.

An integrative view of cell cycle control in Escherichia coli

Bacterial proliferation depends on the cells' capability to proceed through consecutive rounds of the cell cycle. The cell cycle consists of a series of events during which cells grow, copy their genome, partition the duplicated DNA into different cell halves and, ultimately, divide to produce two newly formed daughter cells. Cell cycle control is of the utmost importance to maintain the correct order of events and safeguard the integrity of the cell and its genomic information. This review covers insights into the regulation of individual key cell cycle events in Escherichia coli. The control of initiation of DNA replication, chromosome segregation and cell division is discussed. Furthermore, we highlight connections between these processes. Although detailed mechanistic insight into these connections is largely still emerging, it is clear that the different processes of the bacterial cell cycle are coordinated to one another. This careful coordination of events ensures that every daughter cell ends up with one complete and intact copy of the genome, which is vital for bacterial survival.

A Requirement for Global Transcription Factor Lrp in Licensing Replication of Vibrio cholerae Chromosome 2

The human pathogen, Vibrio cholerae, belongs to the 10% of bacteria in which the genome is divided. Each of its two chromosomes, like bacterial chromosomes in general, replicates from a unique origin at fixed times in the cell cycle. Chr1 initiates first, and upon duplication of a site in Chr1, crtS, Chr2 replication initiates. Recent in vivo experiments demonstrate that crtS binds the Chr2-specific initiator RctB and promotes its initiator activity by remodeling it. Compared to the well-defined RctB binding sites in the Chr2 origin, crtS is an order of magnitude longer, suggesting that other factors can bind to it. We developed an in vivo screen to identify additional crtS-binding proteins and identified the global transcription factor, Lrp, as one such protein. Studies in vivo and in vitro indicate that Lrp binds to crtS and facilitates RctB binding to crtS. Chr2 replication is severely defective in the absence of Lrp, indicative of a critical role of the transcription factor in licensing Chr2 replication. Since Lrp responds to stresses such as nutrient limitation, its interaction with RctB presumably sensitizes Chr2 replication to the physiological state of the cell.

Initiation of DNA Replication at the Chromosomal Origin of E. coli, oriC

The Escherichia coli chromosomal origin consists of a duplex-unwinding region and a region bearing a DNA-bending protein, IHF-binding site, and clusters of binding sites for the initiator protein DnaA. ATP-DnaA molecules form highly organized oligomers in a process stimulated by DiaA, a DnaA-binding protein. The resultant ATP-DnaA complexes promote local unwinding of oriC with the aid of IHF, for which specific interaction of DnaA with the single-stranded DNA is crucial. DnaA complexes also interact with DnaB helicases bound to DnaC loaders, promoting loading of DnaB onto the unwound DNA strands for bidirectional replication. Initiation of replication is strictly regulated during the cell cycle by multiple regulatory systems for oriC and DnaA. The activity of oriC is regulated by its methylation state, whereas that of DnaA depends on the form of the bound nucleotide. ATP-DnaA can be yielded from initiation-inactive ADP-DnaA in a timely manner depending on specific chromosomal DNA elements termed DARS (DnaA-reactivating sequences). After initiation, DnaA-bound ATP is hydrolyzed by two systems, yielding ADP-DnaA. In this review, these and other mechanisms of initiation and its regulation in E. coli are described.

Coordination of Growth, Chromosome Replication/Segregation, and Cell Division in E. coli

Bacterial cells growing in steady state maintain a 1:1:1 relationship between an appropriate mass increase, a round of DNA replication plus sister chromosome segregation, and cell division. This is accomplished without the cell cycle engine found in eukaryotic cells. We propose here a formal logic, and an accompanying mechanism, for how such coordination could be provided in E. coli. Completion of chromosomal and divisome-related events would lead, interactively, to a “progression control complex” (PCC) which provides integrated physical coupling between sister terminus regions and the nascent septum. When a cell has both (i) achieved a sufficient mass increase, and (ii) the PCC has developed, a conformational change in the PCC occurs. This change results in “progression permission,” which triggers both onset of cell division and release of terminus regions. Release of the terminus region, in turn, directly enables a next round of replication initiation via physical changes transmitted through the nucleoid. Division and initiation are then implemented, each at its own rate and timing, according to conditions present. Importantly: (i) the limiting step for progression permission may be either completion of the growth requirement or the chromosome/divisome processes required for assembly of the PCC; and, (ii) the outcome of the proposed process is granting of permission to progress, not determination of the absolute or relative timings of downstream events. This basic logic, and the accompanying mechanism, can explain coordination of events in both slow and fast growth conditions; can accommodate diverse variations and perturbations of cellular events; and is compatible with existing mathematical descriptions of the E. coli cell cycle. Also, while our proposition is specifically designed to provide 1:1:1 coordination among basic events on a “per-cell cycle” basis, it is a small step to further envision permission progression is also the target of basic growth rate control. In such a case, the rate of mass accumulation (or its equivalent) would determine the length of the interval between successive permission events and, thus, successive cell divisions and successive replication initiations.

HU of Streptococcus pneumoniae Is Essential for the Preservation of DNA Supercoiling

The histone-like protein HU is a conserved nucleoid-associated protein that is involved in the maintenance of the bacterial chromosome architecture. It is the only known nucleoid-associated protein in Streptococcus pneumoniae, but it has not been studied. The pneumococcal gene encoding this protein, hlp, is shown herein to be essential for cell viability. Its disruption was only possible either when it was duplicated in the chromosome and its expression induced from the P _Zn promoter, or when hlp was cloned into a plasmid under the control of the inducible P _mal promoter. In vitro assays indicated that pneumococcal HU shows a preference for binding to supercoiled DNA rather than to linear or nicked DNA. In vivo experiments in which the amount of HU was manipulated showed a relationship between the amount of HU and the level of DNA supercoiling. A twofold reduction in the amount of HU triggered a 21% increase in DNA relaxation in untreated cells. However, in cells treated with novobiocin, a drug that relaxes DNA by inhibiting DNA gyrase, a 35% increase in DNA relaxation was observed, instead of the expected 20% in cells with a constitutive HU amount. Conversely, a fourfold HU increase caused only 14% of DNA relaxation in the presence of novobiocin. Taken together, these results support an essential role for HU in the maintenance of DNA supercoiling in S. pneumoniae.

The DnaA Tale

More than 50 years have passed since the presentation of the Replicon Model which states that a positively acting initiator interacts with a specific site on a circular chromosome molecule to initiate DNA replication. Since then, the origin of chromosome replication, oriC, has been determined as a specific region that carries sequences required for binding of positively acting initiator proteins, DnaA-boxes and DnaA proteins, respectively. In this review we will give a historical overview of significant findings which have led to the very detailed knowledge we now possess about the initiation process in bacteria using Escherichia coli as the model organism, but emphasizing that virtually all bacteria have DnaA proteins that interacts with DnaA boxes to initiate chromosome replication. We will discuss the dnaA gene regulation, the special features of the dnaA gene expression, promoter strength, and translation efficiency, as well as, the DnaA protein, its concentration, its binding to DnaA-boxes, and its binding of ATP or ADP. Furthermore, we will discuss the different models for regulation of initiation which have been proposed over the years, with particular emphasis on the Initiator Titration Model.

Regulatory dynamics in the ternary DnaA complex for initiation of chromosomal replication in Escherichia coli

In Escherichia coli, the level of the ATP-DnaA initiator is increased temporarily at the time of replication initiation. The replication origin, oriC, contains a duplex-unwinding element (DUE) flanking a DnaA-oligomerization region (DOR), which includes twelve DnaA-binding sites (DnaA boxes) and the DNA-bending protein IHF-binding site (IBS). Although complexes of IHF and ATP-DnaA assembly on the DOR unwind the DUE, the configuration of the crucial nucleoprotein complexes remains elusive. To resolve this, we analyzed individual DnaA protomers in the complex and here demonstrate that the DUE-DnaA-box-R1-IBS-DnaA-box-R5M region is essential for DUE unwinding. R5M-bound ATP-DnaA predominantly promotes ATP-DnaA assembly on the DUE-proximal DOR, and R1-bound DnaA has a supporting role. This mechanism might support timely assembly of ATP-DnaA on oriC. DnaA protomers bound to R1 and R5M directly bind to the unwound DUE strand, which is crucial in replication initiation. Data from in vivo experiments support these results. We propose that the DnaA assembly on the IHF-bent DOR directly binds to the unwound DUE strand, and timely formation of this ternary complex regulates replication initiation. Structural features of oriC support the idea that these mechanisms for DUE unwinding are fundamentally conserved in various bacterial species including pathogens.

The DnaA Cycle in Escherichia coli: Activation, Function and Inactivation of the Initiator Protein

This review summarizes the mechanisms of the initiator protein DnaA in replication initiation and its regulation in Escherichia coli. The chromosomal origin (oriC) DNA is unwound by the replication initiation complex to allow loading of DnaB helicases and replisome formation. The initiation complex consists of the DnaA protein, DnaA-initiator-associating protein DiaA, integration host factor (IHF), and oriC, which contains a duplex-unwinding element (DUE) and a DnaA-oligomerization region (DOR) containing DnaA-binding sites (DnaA boxes) and a single IHF-binding site that induces sharp DNA bending. DiaA binds to DnaA and stimulates DnaA assembly at the DOR. DnaA binds tightly to ATP and ADP. ATP-DnaA constructs functionally different sub-complexes at DOR, and the DUE-proximal DnaA sub-complex contains IHF and promotes DUE unwinding. The first part of this review presents the structures and mechanisms of oriC-DnaA complexes involved in the regulation of replication initiation. During the cell cycle, the level of ATP-DnaA level, the active form for initiation, is strictly regulated by multiple systems, resulting in timely replication initiation. After initiation, regulatory inactivation of DnaA (RIDA) intervenes to reduce ATP-DnaA level by hydrolyzing the DnaA-bound ATP to ADP to yield ADP-DnaA, the inactive form. RIDA involves the binding of the DNA polymerase clamp on newly synthesized DNA to the DnaA-inactivator Hda protein. In datA-dependent DnaA-ATP hydrolysis (DDAH), binding of IHF at the chromosomal locus datA, which contains a cluster of DnaA boxes, results in further hydrolysis of DnaA-bound ATP. SeqA protein inhibits untimely initiation at oriC by binding to newly synthesized oriC DNA and represses dnaA transcription in a cell cycle dependent manner. To reinitiate DNA replication, ADP-DnaA forms oligomers at DnaA-reactivating sequences (DARS1 and DARS2), resulting in the dissociation of ADP and the release of nucleotide-free apo-DnaA, which then binds ATP to regenerate ATP-DnaA. In vivo, DARS2 plays an important role in this process and its activation is regulated by timely binding of IHF to DARS2 in the cell cycle. Chromosomal locations of DARS sites are optimized for the strict regulation for timely replication initiation. The last part of this review describes how DDAH and DARS regulate DnaA activity.

HupB Is a Bacterial Nucleoid-Associated Protein with an Indispensable Eukaryotic-Like Tail

In bacteria, chromosomal DNA must be efficiently compacted to fit inside the small cell compartment while remaining available for the proteins involved in replication, segregation, and transcription. Among the nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs) responsible for maintaining this highly organized and yet dynamic chromosome structure, the HU protein is one of the most conserved and highly abundant. HupB, a homologue of HU, was recently identified in mycobacteria. This intriguing mycobacterial NAP is composed of two domains: an N-terminal domain that resembles bacterial HU, and a long and distinctive C-terminal domain that contains several PAKK/KAAK motifs, which are characteristic of the H1/H5 family of eukaryotic histones. In this study, we analyzed the in vivo binding of HupB on the chromosome scale. By using PALM (photoactivated localization microscopy) and ChIP-Seq (chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by deep sequencing), we observed that the C-terminal domain is indispensable for the association of HupB with the nucleoid. Strikingly, the in vivo binding of HupB displayed a bias from the origin (oriC) to the terminus (ter) of the mycobacterial chromosome (numbers of binding sites decreased toward ter). We hypothesized that this binding mode reflects a role for HupB in organizing newly replicated oriC regions. Thus, HupB may be involved in coordinating replication with chromosome segregation.IMPORTANCE We currently know little about the organization of the mycobacterial chromosome and its dynamics during the cell cycle. Among the mycobacterial nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs) responsible for chromosome organization and dynamics, HupB is one of the most intriguing. It contains a long and distinctive C-terminal domain that harbors several PAKK/KAAK motifs, which are characteristic of the eukaryotic histone H1/H5 proteins. The HupB protein is also known to be crucial for the survival of tubercle bacilli during infection. Here, we provide in vivo experimental evidence showing that the C-terminal domain of HupB is crucial for its DNA binding. Our results suggest that HupB may be involved in organizing newly replicated regions and could help coordinate chromosome replication with segregation. Given that tuberculosis (TB) remains a serious worldwide health problem (10.4 million new TB cases were diagnosed in 2015, according to WHO) and new multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains are continually emerging, further studies of the biological function of HupB are needed to determine if this protein could be a prospect for novel antimicrobial drug development.

Determination of the Optimal Chromosomal Location(s) for a DNA Element in Escherichia coli Using a Novel Transposon-mediated Approach

The optimal chromosomal position(s) of a given DNA element was/were determined by transposon-mediated random insertion followed by fitness selection. In bacteria, the impact of the genetic context on the function of a genetic element can be difficult to assess. Several mechanisms, including topological effects, transcriptional interference from neighboring genes, and/or replication-associated gene dosage, may affect the function of a given genetic element. Here, we describe a method that permits the random integration of a DNA element into the chromosome of Escherichia coli and select the most favorable locations using a simple growth competition experiment. The method takes advantage of a well-described transposon-based system of random insertion, coupled with a selection of the fittest clone(s) by growth advantage, a procedure that is easily adjustable to experimental needs. The nature of the fittest clone(s) can be determined by whole-genome sequencing on a complex multi-clonal population or by easy gene walking for the rapid identification of selected clones. Here, the non-coding DNA region DARS2, which controls the initiation of chromosome replication in E. coli, was used as an example. The function of DARS2 is known to be affected by replication-associated gene dosage; the closer DARS2 gets to the origin of DNA replication, the more active it becomes. DARS2 was randomly inserted into the chromosome of a DARS2-deleted strain. The resultant clones containing individual insertions were pooled and competed against one another for hundreds of generations. Finally, the fittest clones were characterized and found to contain DARS2 inserted in close proximity to the original DARS2 location.

Countermeasures to survive excessive chromosome replication in Escherichia coli

In Escherichia coli, like all organisms, DNA replication is coordinated with cell cycle progression to ensure duplication of the genome prior to cell division. Chromosome replication is initiated from the replication origin, oriC, by the DnaA protein associated with ATP. Initiations take place once per cell cycle and in synchrony at all cellular origins. DnaA also binds ADP with similar affinity as ATP and in wild-type cells the majority of DnaA molecules are ADP bound. In cells where the DnaA^ATP/DnaA^ADP ratio increases or in cells where DnaA^ATP has increased access to oriC, premature initiations take place, often referred to as overinitiation. Overinitiating cells are generally characterized by their slow growth and in the most severe cases lethal accumulation of DNA strand breaks. Here, we review the different strategies adopted by E. coli to survive overinitiation. We propose a unifying model where all mutations that suppress overinitiation keep replication forks separated in time and, thereby, reduce the formation of strand breaks. One group of mutations does so by lowering the activity of oriC and/or DnaA to reduce the frequency of initiations to an acceptable level. In the other group of mutations, replication forks are kept apart by preventing formation of damages that would otherwise cause replication blocks, by allowing bypass of replication blocks and/or by slowing down replication forks. This group of suppressors restores viability despite excessive chromosome replication and provides new insights into mechanisms that safeguard DNA integrity.

Recent Advances in Helicobacter pylori Replication: Possible Implications in Adaptation to a Pathogenic Lifestyle and Perspectives for Drug Design

DNA replication is an important step in the life cycle of every cell that ensures the continuous flow of genetic information from one generation to the next. In all organisms, chromosome replication must be coordinated with overall cell growth. Helicobacter pylori growth strongly depends on its interaction with the host, particularly with the gastric epithelium. Moreover, H. pylori actively searches for an optimal microniche within a stomach, and it has been shown that not every microniche equally supports growth of this bacterium. We postulate that besides nutrients, H. pylori senses different, unknown signals, which presumably also affect chromosome replication to maintain H. pylori propagation at optimal ratio allowing H. pylori to establish a chronic, lifelong infection. Thus, H. pylori chromosome replication and particularly the regulation of this process might be considered important for bacterial pathogenesis. Here, we summarize our current knowledge of chromosome and plasmid replication in H. pylori and discuss the mechanisms responsible for regulating this key cellular process. The results of extensive studies conducted thus far allow us to propose common and unique traits in H. pylori chromosome replication. Interestingly, the repertoire of proteins involved in replication in H. pylori is significantly different to that in E. coli, strongly suggesting that novel factors are engaged in H. pylori chromosome replication and could represent attractive drug targets.

Control of Initiation of DNA Replication in Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli

Initiation of DNA Replication is tightly regulated in all cells since imbalances in chromosomal copy number are deleterious and often lethal. In bacteria such as Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli, at the point of cytokinesis, there must be two complete copies of the chromosome to partition into the daughter cells following division at mid-cell during vegetative growth. Under conditions of rapid growth, when the time taken to replicate the chromosome exceeds the doubling time of the cells, there will be multiple initiations per cell cycle and daughter cells will inherit chromosomes that are already undergoing replication. In contrast, cells entering the sporulation pathway in B. subtilis can do so only during a short interval in the cell cycle when there are two, and only two, chromosomes per cell, one destined for the spore and one for the mother cell. Here, we briefly describe the overall process of DNA replication in bacteria before reviewing initiation of DNA replication in detail. The review covers DnaA-directed assembly of the replisome at oriC and the multitude of mechanisms of regulation of initiation, with a focus on the similarities and differences between E. coli and B. subtilis.

Control of bacterial chromosome replication by non-coding regions outside the origin

Chromosome replication in Eubacteria is initiated by initiator protein(s) binding to specific sites within the replication origin, oriC. Recently, initiator protein binding to chromosomal regions outside the origin has attracted renewed attention; as such binding sites contribute to control the frequency of initiations. These outside-oriC binding sites function in several different ways: by steric hindrances of replication fork assembly, by titration of initiator proteins away from the origin, by performing a chaperone-like activity for inactivation- or activation of initiator proteins or by mediating crosstalk between chromosomes. Here, we discuss initiator binding to outside-oriC sites in a broad range of different taxonomic groups, to highlight the significance of such regions for regulation of bacterial chromosome replication. For Escherichia coli, it was recently shown that the genomic positions of regulatory elements are important for bacterial fitness, which, as we discuss, could be true for several other organisms.

Cooperative DnaA Binding to the Negatively Supercoiled datA Locus Stimulates DnaA-ATP Hydrolysis

Timely initiation of replication in Escherichia coli requires functional regulation of the replication initiator, ATP-DnaA. The cellular level of ATP-DnaA increases just before initiation, after which its level decreases through hydrolysis of DnaA-bound ATP, yielding initiation-inactive ADP-DnaA. Previously, we reported a novel DnaA-ATP hydrolysis system involving the chromosomal locus datA and named it datA-dependent DnaA-ATP hydrolysis (DDAH). The datA locus contains a binding site for a nucleoid-associating factor integration host factor (IHF) and a cluster of three known DnaA-binding sites, which are important for DDAH. However, the mechanisms underlying the formation and regulation of the datA-IHF·DnaA complex remain unclear. We now demonstrate that a novel DnaA box within datA is essential for ATP-DnaA complex formation and DnaA-ATP hydrolysis. Specific DnaA residues, which are important for interaction with bound ATP and for head-to-tail inter-DnaA interaction, were also required for ATP-DnaA-specific oligomer formation on datA Furthermore, we show that negative DNA supercoiling of datA stabilizes ATP-DnaA oligomers, and stimulates datA-IHF interaction and DnaA-ATP hydrolysis. Relaxation of DNA supercoiling by the addition of novobiocin, a DNA gyrase inhibitor, inhibits datA function in cells. On the basis of these results, we propose a mechanistic model of datA-IHF·DnaA complex formation and DNA supercoiling-dependent regulation for DDAH.

Random versus Cell Cycle-Regulated Replication Initiation in Bacteria: Insights from Studying Vibrio cholerae Chromosome 2

Bacterial chromosomes initiate replication at a fixed time in the cell cycle, whereas there is generally no particular time for plasmid replication initiation or chromosomal replication initiation from integrated plasmids. In bacteria with divided genomes, the replication system of one of the chromosomes typically resembles that of bacteria with undivided genomes, whereas the remaining chromosomes have plasmid-like replication systems. For example, in Vibrio cholerae, a bacterium with two chromosomes (chromosome 1 [Chr1] and Chr2), the Chr1 system resembles that of the Escherichia coli chromosome, and the Chr2 system resembles that of iteron-based plasmids. However, Chr2 still initiates replication at a fixed time in the cell cycle and thus offers an opportunity to understand the molecular basis for the difference between random and cell cycle-regulated modes of replication. Here we review studies of replication control in Chr2 and compare it to those of plasmids and chromosomes. We argue that although the Chr2 control mechanisms in many ways are reminiscent of those of plasmids, they also appear to combine more regulatory features than are found on a typical plasmid, including some that are more typical of chromosomes. One of the regulatory mechanisms is especially novel, the coordinated timing of replication initiation of Chr1 and Chr2, providing the first example of communication between chromosomes for replication initiation.

DNA Replication Control Is Linked to Genomic Positioning of Control Regions in Escherichia coli

Chromosome replication in Escherichia coli is in part controlled by three non-coding genomic sequences, DARS1, DARS2, and datA that modulate the activity of the initiator protein DnaA. The relative distance from oriC to the non-coding regions are conserved among E. coli species, despite large variations in genome size. Here we use a combination of i) site directed translocation of each region to new positions on the bacterial chromosome and ii) random transposon mediated translocation followed by culture evolution, to show genetic evidence for the importance of position. Here we provide evidence that the genomic locations of these regulatory sequences are important for cell cycle control and bacterial fitness. In addition, our work shows that the functionally redundant DARS1 and DARS2 regions play different roles in replication control. DARS1 is mainly involved in maintaining the origin concentration, whether DARS2 is also involved in maintaining single cell synchrony.

Reversible lysine acetylation is involved in DNA replication initiation by regulating activities of initiator DnaA in Escherichia coli

The regulation of chromosomal replication is critical and the activation of DnaA by ATP binding is a key step in replication initiation. However, it remains unclear whether and how the process of ATP-binding to DnaA is regulated. Here, we show that DnaA can be acetylated, and its acetylation level varies with cell growth and correlates with DNA replication initiation frequencies in E. coli. Specifically, the conserved K178 in Walker A motif of DnaA can be acetylated and its acetylation level reaches the summit at the stationary phase, which prevents DnaA from binding to ATP or oriC and leads to inhibition of DNA replication initiation. The deacetylation process of DnaA is catalyzed by deacetylase CobB. The acetylation process of DnaA is mediated by acetyltransferase YfiQ, and nonenzymatically by acetyl-phosphate. These findings suggest that the reversible acetylation of DnaA ensures cells to respond promptly to environmental changes. Since Walker A motif is universally distributed across organisms, acetylation of Walker A motif may present a novel regulatory mechanism conserved from bacteria to eukaryotes.

Chromosomal location of the DnaA-reactivating sequence DARS2 is important to regulate timely initiation of DNA replication in Escherichia coli

In Escherichia coli, the initiator protein ATP-DnaA promotes initiation of chromosome replication in a timely manner. After initiation, DnaA-bound ATP is hydrolyzed to yield ADP-DnaA, which is inactive in initiation. DnaA-reactivating sequences (DARS1 and DARS2) on the chromosome have predominant roles in catalysis of nucleotide exchange, producing ATP-DnaA from ADP-DnaA, which is prerequisite for timely initiation. Both DARS sequences have a core region containing a cluster of three DnaA-binding sites. DARS2 is more effective in vivo than DARS1, and timely activation of DARS2 depends on binding of two nucleoid-associated proteins, IHF and Fis. DARS2 is located centrally between the chromosomal replication origin oriC and the terminus region terC. We constructed mutants in which DARS2 was translocated to several chromosomal loci, including sites proximal to oriC and to terC. Replication initiation was inhibited in cells in which DARS2 was translocated to terC-proximal sites when the cells were grown at 42 °C, although overall binding efficiency of IHF and Fis to the translocated DARS2 was not affected. Inhibition was largely sustained even in cells lacking MatP, a DNA-binding protein responsible for terC-specific subchromosomal structure. These results suggest that functional regulation of DARS2 is correlated with its chromosomal location under certain conditions.

Multiple DNA Binding Proteins Contribute to Timing of Chromosome Replication in E. coli

Chromosome replication in Escherichia coli is initiated from a single origin, oriC. Initiation involves a number of DNA binding proteins, but only DnaA is essential and specific for the initiation process. DnaA is an AAA+ protein that binds both ATP and ADP with similar high affinities. DnaA associated with either ATP or ADP binds to a set of strong DnaA binding sites in oriC, whereas only DnaA^ATP is capable of binding additional and weaker sites to promote initiation. Additional DNA binding proteins act to ensure that initiation occurs timely by affecting either the cellular mass at which DNA replication is initiated, or the time window in which all origins present in a single cell are initiated, i.e. initiation synchrony, or both. Overall, these DNA binding proteins modulate the initiation frequency from oriC by: (i) binding directly to oriC to affect DnaA binding, (ii) altering the DNA topology in or around oriC, (iii) altering the nucleotide bound status of DnaA by interacting with non-coding chromosomal sequences, distant from oriC, that are important for DnaA activity. Thus, although DnaA is the key protein for initiation of replication, other DNA-binding proteins act not only on oriC for modulation of its activity but also at additional regulatory sites to control the nucleotide bound status of DnaA. Here we review the contribution of key DNA binding proteins to the tight regulation of chromosome replication in E. coli cells.

The Escherichia coli Cryptic Prophage Protein YfdR Binds to DnaA and Initiation of Chromosomal Replication Is Inhibited by Overexpression of the Gene Cluster yfdQ-yfdR-yfdS-yfdT

The initiation of bacterial chromosomal replication is regulated by multiple pathways. To explore novel regulators, we isolated multicopy suppressors for the cold-sensitive hda-185 ΔsfiA(sulA) mutant. Hda is crucial for the negative regulation of the initiator DnaA and the hda-185 mutation causes severe replication overinitiation at the replication origin oriC. The SOS-associated division inhibitor SfiA inhibits FtsZ ring formation, an essential step for cell division regulation during the SOS response, and ΔsfiA enhances the cold sensitivity of hda-185 cells in colony formation. One of the suppressors comprised the yfdQ-yfdR-yfdS-yfdT gene cluster carried on a cryptic prophage. Increased copy numbers of yfdQRT or yfdQRS inhibited not only hda-185-dependent overinitiation, but also replication overinitiation in a hyperactive dnaA mutant, and in a mutant lacking an oriC-binding initiation-inhibitor SeqA. In addition, increasing the copy number of the gene set inhibited the growth of cells bearing specific, initiation-impairing dnaA mutations. In wild-type cells, multicopy supply of yfdQRT or yfdQRS also inhibited replication initiation and increased hydroxyurea (HU)-resistance, as seen in cells lacking DiaA, a stimulator of DnaA assembly on oriC. Deletion of the yfdQ-yfdR-yfdS-yfdT genes did not affect either HU resistance or initiation regulation. Furthermore, we found that DnaA bound specifically to YfdR in soluble protein extracts oversupplied with YfdQRST. Purified YfdR also bound to DnaA, and DnaA Phe46, an amino acid residue crucial for DnaA interactions with DiaA and DnaB replicative helicase was important for this interaction. Consistently, YfdR moderately inhibited DiaA-DnaA and DnaB-DnaA interactions. In addition, protein extracts oversupplied with YfdQRST inhibited replication initiation in vitro. Given the roles of yfdQ and yfdS in cell tolerance to specific environmental stresses, the yfdQ-yfdR-yfdS-yfdT genes might downregulate the initiator DnaA-oriC complex under specific growth conditions.

Specific binding of eukaryotic ORC to DNA replication origins depends on highly conserved basic residues

In eukaryotes, the origin recognition complex (ORC) heterohexamer preferentially binds replication origins to trigger initiation of DNA replication. Crystallographic studies using eubacterial and archaeal ORC orthologs suggested that eukaryotic ORC may bind to origin DNA via putative winged-helix DNA-binding domains and AAA+ ATPase domains. However, the mechanisms how eukaryotic ORC recognizes origin DNA remain elusive. Here, we show in budding yeast that Lys-362 and Arg-367 residues of the largest subunit (Orc1), both outside the aforementioned domains, are crucial for specific binding of ORC to origin DNA. These basic residues, which reside in a putative disordered domain, were dispensable for interaction with ATP and non-specific DNA sequences, suggesting a specific role in recognition. Consistent with this, both residues were required for origin binding of Orc1 in vivo. A truncated Orc1 polypeptide containing these residues solely recognizes ARS sequence with low affinity and Arg-367 residue stimulates sequence specific binding mode of the polypeptide. Lys-362 and Arg-367 residues of Orc1 are highly conserved among eukaryotic ORCs, but not in eubacterial and archaeal orthologs, suggesting a eukaryote-specific mechanism underlying recognition of replication origins by ORC.

Control regions for chromosome replication are conserved with respect to sequence and location among Escherichia coli strains

In Escherichia coli, chromosome replication is initiated from oriC by the DnaA initiator protein associated with ATP. Three non-coding regions contribute to the activity of DnaA. The datA locus is instrumental in conversion of DnaA^ATP to DnaA^ADP (datA dependent DnaA^ATP hydrolysis) whereas DnaA rejuvenation sequences 1 and 2 (DARS1 and DARS2) reactivate DnaA^ADP to DnaA^ATP. The structural organization of oriC, datA, DARS1, and DARS2 were found conserved among 59 fully sequenced E. coli genomes, with differences primarily in the non-functional spacer regions between key protein binding sites. The relative distances from oriC to datA, DARS1, and DARS2, respectively, was also conserved despite of large variations in genome size, suggesting that the gene dosage of either region is important for bacterial growth. Yet all three regions could be deleted alone or in combination without loss of viability. Competition experiments during balanced growth in rich medium and during mouse colonization indicated roles of datA, DARS1, and DARS2 for bacterial fitness although the relative contribution of each region differed between growth conditions. We suggest that this fitness advantage has contributed to conservation of both sequence and chromosomal location for datA, DARS1, and DARS2.

The Arg Fingers of Key DnaA Protomers Are Oriented Inward within the Replication Origin oriC and Stimulate DnaA Subcomplexes in the Initiation Complex

ATP-DnaA binds to multiple DnaA boxes in the Escherichia coli replication origin (oriC) and forms left-half and right-half subcomplexes that promote DNA unwinding and DnaB helicase loading. DnaA forms homo-oligomers in a head-to-tail manner via interactions between the bound ATP and Arg-285 of the adjacent protomer. DnaA boxes R1 and R4 reside at the outer edges of the DnaA-binding region and have opposite orientations. In this study, roles for the protomers bound at R1 and R4 were elucidated using chimeric DnaA molecules that had alternative DNA binding sequence specificity and chimeric oriC molecules bearing the alternative DnaA binding sequence at R1 or R4. In vitro, protomers at R1 and R4 promoted initiation regardless of whether the bound nucleotide was ADP or ATP. Arg-285 was shown to play an important role in the formation of subcomplexes that were active in oriC unwinding and DnaB loading. The results of in vivo analysis using the chimeric molecules were consistent with the in vitro data. Taken together, the data suggest a model in which DnaA subcomplexes form in symmetrically opposed orientations and in which the Arg-285 fingers face inward to mediate interactions with adjacent protomers. This mode is consistent with initiation regulation by ATP-DnaA and bidirectional loading of DnaB helicases.