Quantitative characterization of protein-protein complexes involved in base excision DNA repair

Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 has major impact in prevention of suicidal covalent DNA-protein crosslink with apurinic/apyrimidinic site in cellular extracts

DNA-protein crosslinks (DPC) are common DNA lesions induced by various external and endogenous agents. One of the sources of DPC is the apurinic/apyrimidinic site (AP site) and proteins interacting with it. Some proteins possessing AP lyase activity form covalent complexes with AP site-containing DNA without borohydride reduction (suicidal crosslinks). We have shown earlier that tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (TDP1) but not AP endonuclease 1 (APE1) is able to remove intact OGG1 from protein-DNA adducts, whereas APE1 is able to prevent the formation of DPC by hydrolyzing the AP site. Here we demonstrate that TDP1 can remove intact PARP2 but not XRCC1 from covalent enzyme-DNA adducts with AP-DNA formed in the absence of APE1. We also analyzed an impact of APE1 and TDP1 on the efficiency of DPC formation in APE1-/- or TDP1-/- cell extracts. Our data revealed that APE1 depletion leads to increased levels of PARP1-DNA crosslinks, whereas TDP1 deficiency has little effect on DPC formation.

Divalent and multivalent cations control liquid-like assembly of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated PARP1 into multimolecular associates in vitro

The formation of nuclear biomolecular condensates is often associated with local accumulation of proteins at a site of DNA damage. The key role in the formation of DNA repair foci belongs to PARP1, which is a sensor of DNA damage and catalyzes the synthesis of poly(ADP-ribose) attracting repair factors. We show here that biogenic cations such as Mg2+, Ca2+, Mn2+, spermidine3+, or spermine4+ can induce liquid-like assembly of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated [PARylated] PARP1 into multimolecular associates (hereafter: self-assembly). The self-assembly of PARylated PARP1 affects the level of its automodification and hydrolysis of poly(ADP-ribose) by poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG). Furthermore, association of PARylated PARP1 with repair proteins strongly stimulates strand displacement DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase β (Pol β) but has no noticeable effect on DNA ligase III activity. Thus, liquid-like self-assembly of PARylated PARP1 may play a critical part in the regulation of i) its own activity, ii) PARG-dependent hydrolysis of poly(ADP-ribose), and iii) Pol β-mediated DNA synthesis. The latter can be considered an additional factor influencing the choice between long-patch and short-patch DNA synthesis during repair.

Does the XPA-FEN1 Interaction Concern to Nucleotide Excision Repair or Beyond?

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is the most universal repair pathway, which removes a wide range of DNA helix-distorting lesions caused by chemical or physical agents. The final steps of this repair process are gap-filling repair synthesis and subsequent ligation. XPA is the central NER scaffolding protein factor and can be involved in post-incision NER stages. Replication machinery is loaded after the first incision of the damaged strand that is performed by the XPF-ERCC1 nuclease forming a damaged 5'-flap processed by the XPG endonuclease. Flap endonuclease I (FEN1) is a critical component of replication machinery and is absolutely indispensable for the maturation of newly synthesized strands. FEN1 also contributes to the long-patch pathway of base excision repair. Here, we use a set of DNA substrates containing a fluorescently labeled 5'-flap and different size gap to analyze possible repair factor-replication factor interactions. Ternary XPA-FEN1-DNA complexes with each tested DNA are detected. Furthermore, we demonstrate XPA-FEN1 complex formation in the absence of DNA due to protein-protein interaction. Functional assays reveal that XPA moderately inhibits FEN1 catalytic activity. Using fluorescently labeled XPA, formation of ternary RPA-XPA-FEN1 complex, where XPA accommodates FEN1 and RPA contacts simultaneously, can be proposed. We discuss possible functional roles of the XPA-FEN1 interaction in NER related DNA resynthesis and/or other DNA metabolic processes where XPA can be involved in the complex with FEN1.

Transcriptomic analysis of HEK293A cells with a CRISPR/Cas9-mediated TDP1 knockout

Tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (TDP1) is a human DNA repair protein. It is a member of the phospholipase D family based on structural similarity. TDP1 is a key enzyme of the repair of stalled topoisomerase 1 (TOP1)-DNA complexes. Previously, with the CRISPR/Cas9 method, we obtained HEK293A cells with a homozygous knockout of the TDP1 gene and used the TDP1 knockout cells as a cellular model for studying mechanisms of action of an anticancer therapy. In the present work, we hypothesized that the TDP1 knockout would alter the expression of DNA repair-related genes. By transcriptomic analysis, we investigated for the first time the effect of the TDP1 gene knockout on genes' expression changes in the human HEK293A cell line. We obtained original data implying a role of TDP1 in other processes besides the repair of the DNA-TOP1 complex. Differentially expressed gene analysis revealed that TDP1 may participate in cell adhesion and communication, spermatogenesis, mitochondrial function, neurodegeneration, a cytokine response, and the MAPK signaling pathway.

DNA Repair Protein XRCC1 Stimulates Activity of DNA Polymerase λ under Conditions of Microphase Separation

Non-membrane compartments or biomolecular condensates play an important role in the regulation of cellular processes including DNA repair. Here, an ability of XRCC1, a scaffold protein involved in DNA base excision repair (BER) and single-strand break repair, to form protein-rich microphases in the presence of DNA duplexes was discovered. We also showed that the gap-filling activity of BER-related DNA polymerase λ (Pol λ) is significantly increased by the presence of XRCC1. The stimulation of the Pol λ activity was observed only at micromolar XRCC1 concentrations, which were well above the nanomolar dissociation constant determined for the XRCC1-Pol λ complex and pointed to the presence of an auxiliary stimulatory factor in addition to protein-protein interactions. Indeed, according to dynamic light scattering measurements, the stimulation of the Pol λ activity by XRCC1 was coupled with microphase separation in a protein-DNA mixture. Fluorescence microscopy revealed colocalization of Pol λ, XRCC1, and gapped DNA within the microphases. Thus, stimulation of Pol λ activity is caused both by its interaction with XRCC1 and by specific conditions of microphase separation; this phenomenon is shown for the first time.

Impact of DNA ligase 1 and IIIα interactions with APE1 and polβ on the efficiency of base excision repair pathway at the downstream steps

Base excision repair (BER) requires a tight coordination between the repair enzymes through protein-protein interactions and involves gap filling by DNA polymerase (pol) β and subsequent nick sealing by DNA ligase (LIG) 1 or LIGIIIα at the downstream steps. Apurinic/apyrimidinic-endonuclease 1 (APE1), by its exonuclease activity, proofreads 3' mismatches incorporated by polβ during BER. We previously reported that the interruptions in the functional interplay between polβ and the BER ligases result in faulty repair events. Yet, how the protein interactions of LIG1 and LIGIIIα could affect the repair pathway coordination during nick sealing at the final steps remains unknown. Here, we demonstrate that LIGIIIα interacts more tightly with polβ and APE1 than LIG1, and the N-terminal noncatalytic region of LIG1 as well as the catalytic core and BRCT domain of LIGIIIα mediate interactions with both proteins. Our results demonstrated less efficient nick sealing of polβ nucleotide insertion products in the absence of LIGIIIα zinc-finger domain and LIG1 N-terminal region. Furthermore, we showed a coordination between APE1 and LIG1/LIGIIIα during the removal of 3' mismatches from the nick repair intermediate on which both BER ligases can seal noncanonical ends or gap repair intermediate leading to products of single deletion mutagenesis. Overall results demonstrate the importance of functional coordination from gap filling by polβ coupled to nick sealing by LIG1/LIGIIIα in the presence of proofreading by APE1, which is mainly governed by protein-protein interactions and protein-DNA intermediate communications, to maintain repair efficiency at the downstream steps of the BER pathway.

Beyond microtubules: The cellular environment at the endoplasmic reticulum attracts proteins to the nucleus, enabling nuclear transport

All proteins are translated in the cytoplasm, yet many, including transcription factors, play vital roles in the nucleus. While previous research has concentrated on molecular motors for the transport of these proteins to the nucleus, recent observations reveal perinuclear accumulation even in the absence of an energy source, hinting at alternative mechanisms. Here, we propose that structural properties of the cellular environment, specifically the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), can promote molecular transport to the perinucleus without requiring additional energy expenditure. Specifically, physical interaction between proteins and the ER impedes their diffusion and leads to their accumulation near the nucleus. This result explains why larger proteins, more frequently interacting with the ER membrane, tend to accumulate at the perinucleus. Interestingly, such diffusion in a heterogeneous environment follows Chapman's law rather than the popular Fick's law. Our findings suggest a novel protein transport mechanism arising solely from characteristics of the intracellular environment.

Impact of polβ/XRCC1 Interaction Variants on the Efficiency of Nick Sealing by DNA Ligase IIIα in the Base Excision Repair Pathway

Base excision repair (BER) requires a coordination from gap filling by DNA polymerase (pol) β to subsequent nick sealing by DNA ligase (LIG) IIIα at downstream steps of the repair pathway. X-ray cross-complementing protein 1 (XRCC1), a non-enzymatic scaffolding protein, forms repair complexes with polβ and LIGIIIα. Yet, the impact of the polβ mutations that affect XRCC1 interaction and protein stability on the repair pathway coordination during nick sealing by LIGIIIα remains unknown. Our results show that the polβ colon cancer-associated variant T304 exhibits a reduced interaction with XRCC1 and the mutations in the interaction interface of V303 loop (L301R/V303R/V306R) and at the lysine residues (K206A/K244A) that prevent ubiquitin-mediated degradation of the protein exhibit a diminished repair protein complex formation with XRCC1. Furthermore, we demonstrate no significant effect on gap and nick DNA binding affinity of wild-type polβ by these mutations. Finally, our results reveal that XRCC1 leads to an efficient channeling of nick repair products after nucleotide incorporation by polβ variants to LIGIIIα, which is compromised by the L301R/V303R/V306R and K206A/K244A mutations. Overall, our findings provide insight into how the mutations in the polβ/XRCC1 interface and the regions affecting protein stability could dictate accurate BER pathway coordination at the downstream steps involving nick sealing by LIGIIIα.

Coordination between human DNA polymerase β and apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 in the course of DNA repair

Coordination of enzymatic activities in the course of base excision repair (BER) is essential to ensure complete repair of damaged bases. Two major mechanisms underlying the coordination of BER are known today: the "passing the baton" model and a model of preassembled stable multiprotein repair complexes called "repairosomes." In this work, we aimed to elucidate the coordination between human apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease APE1 and DNA polymerase Polβ in BER through studying an impact of APE1 on Polβ-catalyzed nucleotide incorporation into different model substrates that mimic different single-strand break (SSB) intermediates arising along the BER pathway. It was found that APE1's impact on separate stages of Polβ's catalysis depends on the nature of a DNA substrate. In this complex, APE1 removed 3' blocking groups and corrected Polβ-catalyzed DNA synthesis in a coordinated manner. Our findings support the hypothesis that Polβ not only can displace APE1 from damaged DNA within the "passing the baton" model but also performs the gap-filling reaction in the ternary complex with APE1 according to the "repairosome" model. Taken together, our results provide new insights into coordination between APE1 and Polβ during the BER process.

Cas9 is mostly orthogonal to human systems of DNA break sensing and repair

CRISPR/Cas9 system is а powerful gene editing tool based on the RNA-guided cleavage of target DNA. The Cas9 activity can be modulated by proteins involved in DNA damage signalling and repair due to their interaction with double- and single-strand breaks (DSB and SSB, respectively) generated by wild-type Cas9 or Cas9 nickases. Here we address the interplay between Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 and key DNA repair factors, including poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (SSB/DSB sensor), its closest homolog poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 2, Ku antigen (DSB sensor), DNA ligase I (SSB sensor), replication protein A (DNA duplex destabilizer), and Y-box binding protein 1 (RNA/DNA binding protein). None of those significantly affected Cas9 activity, while Cas9 efficiently shielded DSBs and SSBs from their sensors. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of Cas9 detected for poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 2 had no apparent effect on the activity. In cellulo, Cas9-dependent gene editing was independent of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1. Thus, Cas9 can be regarded as an enzyme mostly orthogonal to the natural regulation of human systems of DNA break sensing and repair.

Non-Catalytic Domains of DNA Polymerase λ: Influence on Enzyme Activity and Its Regulation

DNA polymerase λ (Polλ) belongs to the same structural X-family as DNA polymerase β, the main polymerase of base excision repair. The role of Polλ in this process remains not fully understood. A significant difference between the two DNA polymerases is the presence of an extended non-catalytic N-terminal region in the Polλ structure. The influence of this region on the interaction of Polλ with DNA and multifunctional proteins, poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase 1 (PARP1) and replication protein A (RPA), was studied in detail for the first time. The data obtained suggest that non-catalytic Polλ domains play a suppressor role both in relation to the polymerase activity of the enzyme and in interaction with DNA and PARP1.

Visualizing the coordination of apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease (APE1) and DNA polymerase β during base excision repair

Base excision repair (BER) is carried out by a series of proteins that function in a step-by-step process to identify, remove, and replace DNA damage. During BER, the DNA transitions through various intermediate states as it is processed by each DNA repair enzyme. Left unrepaired, these BER intermediates can transition into double-stranded DNA breaks and promote genome instability. Previous studies have proposed a short-lived complex consisting of the BER intermediate, the incoming enzyme, and the outgoing enzyme at each step of the BER pathway to protect the BER intermediate. The transfer of BER intermediates between enzymes, known as BER coordination or substrate channeling, remains poorly understood. Here, we utilize single-molecule total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy to investigate the mechanism of BER coordination between apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) and DNA polymerase β (Pol β). When preformed complexes of APE1 and the incised abasic site product (APE1 product and Pol β substrate) were subsequently bound by Pol β, the Pol β enzyme dissociated shortly after binding in most of the observations. In the events where Pol β binding was followed by APE1 dissociation during substrate channeling, Pol β remained bound for a longer period of time to allow disassociation of APE1. Our results indicate that transfer of the BER intermediate from APE1 to Pol β during BER is dependent on the dissociation kinetics of APE1 and the duration of the ternary complex on the incised abasic site.

Fluorescently labeled human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease APE1 reveals effects of DNA polymerase β on the APE1-DNA interaction

The base excision repair (BER) pathway involves sequential action of DNA glycosylases and apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonucleases to incise damaged DNA and prepare DNA termini for incorporation of a correct nucleotide by DNA polymerases. It has been suggested that the enzymatic steps in BER include recognition of a product-enzyme complex by the next enzyme in the pathway, resulting in the "passing-the-baton" model of transfer of DNA intermediates between enzymes. To verify this model, in this work, we aimed to create a suitable experimental system. We prepared APE1 site-specifically labeled with a fluorescent reporter that is sensitive to stages of APE1-DNA binding, of formation of the catalytic complex, and of subsequent dissociation of the enzyme-product complex. Interactions of the labeled APE1 with various model DNA substrates (containing an abasic site) of varied lengths revealed that the enzyme remains mostly in complex with the DNA product. By means of the fluorescently labeled APE1 in combination with a stopped-flow fluorescence assay, it was found that Polβ stimulates both i) APE1 binding to an abasic-site-containing DNA duplex with the formation of a catalytically competent complex and ii) the dissociation of APE1 from its product. These findings confirm DNA-mediated coordination of APE1 and Polβ activities and suggest that Polβ is the key trigger of the DNA transfer between the enzymes participating in initial steps of BER.

Structures of LIG1 that engage with mutagenic mismatches inserted by polβ in base excision repair

DNA ligase I (LIG1) catalyzes the ligation of the nick repair intermediate after gap filling by DNA polymerase (pol) β during downstream steps of the base excision repair (BER) pathway. However, how LIG1 discriminates against the mutagenic 3'-mismatches incorporated by polβ at atomic resolution remains undefined. Here, we determine the X-ray structures of LIG1/nick DNA complexes with G:T and A:C mismatches and uncover the ligase strategies that favor or deter the ligation of base substitution errors. Our structures reveal that the LIG1 active site can accommodate a G:T mismatch in the wobble conformation, where an adenylate (AMP) is transferred to the 5'-phosphate of a nick (DNA-AMP), while it stays in the LIG1-AMP intermediate during the initial step of the ligation reaction in the presence of an A:C mismatch at the 3'-strand. Moreover, we show mutagenic ligation and aberrant nick sealing of dG:T and dA:C mismatches, respectively. Finally, we demonstrate that AP-endonuclease 1 (APE1), as a compensatory proofreading enzyme, removes the mismatched bases and interacts with LIG1 at the final BER steps. Our overall findings provide the features of accurate versus mutagenic outcomes coordinated by a multiprotein complex including polβ, LIG1, and APE1 to maintain efficient repair.

Polymerase ζ is Involved in Mitochondrial DNA Maintenance Processes in Concert with APE1 Activity

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) damaged by reactive oxygen species (ROS) triggers so far poorly understood processes of mtDNA maintenance that are coordinated by a complex interplay among DNA repair, DNA degradation, and DNA replication. This study was designed to identify the proteins involved in mtDNA maintenance by applying a special long-range PCR, reflecting mtDNA integrity in the minor arc. A siRNA screening of literature-based candidates was performed under conditions of enforced oxidative phosphorylation revealing the functional group of polymerases and therein polymerase ζ (POLZ) as top hits. Thus, POLZ knockdown caused mtDNA accumulation, which required the activity of the base excision repair (BER) nuclease APE1, and was followed by compensatory mtDNA replication determined by the single-cell mitochondrial in situ hybridization protocol (mTRIP). Quenching reactive oxygen species (ROS) in mitochondria unveiled an additional, ROS-independent involvement of POLZ in the formation of a typical deletion in the minor arc region. Together with data demonstrating the localization of POLZ in mitochondria, we suggest that POLZ plays a significant role in mtDNA turnover, particularly under conditions of oxidative stress.

The Role of Natural Polymorphic Variants of DNA Polymerase β in DNA Repair

DNA polymerase β (Polβ) is considered the main repair DNA polymerase involved in the base excision repair (BER) pathway, which plays an important part in the repair of damaged DNA bases usually resulting from alkylation or oxidation. In general, BER involves consecutive actions of DNA glycosylases, AP endonucleases, DNA polymerases, and DNA ligases. It is known that protein-protein interactions of Polβ with enzymes from the BER pathway increase the efficiency of damaged base repair in DNA. However natural single-nucleotide polymorphisms can lead to a substitution of functionally significant amino acid residues and therefore affect the catalytic activity of the enzyme and the accuracy of Polβ action. Up-to-date databases contain information about more than 8000 SNPs in the gene of Polβ. This review summarizes data on the in silico prediction of the effects of Polβ SNPs on DNA repair efficacy; available data on cancers associated with SNPs of Polβ; and experimentally tested variants of Polβ. Analysis of the literature indicates that amino acid substitutions could be important for the maintenance of the native structure of Polβ and contacts with DNA; others affect the catalytic activity of the enzyme or play a part in the precise and correct attachment of the required nucleotide triphosphate. Moreover, the amino acid substitutions in Polβ can disturb interactions with enzymes involved in BER, while the enzymatic activity of the polymorphic variant may not differ significantly from that of the wild-type enzyme. Therefore, investigation regarding the effect of Polβ natural variants occurring in the human population on enzymatic activity and protein-protein interactions is an urgent scientific task.

Role of YB-1 in Regulation of Poly(ADP-Ribosylation) Catalyzed by Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerases

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is a post-translational modification of proteins that performs an essential regulatory function in the cellular response to DNA damage. The key enzyme synthesizing poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) in the cells is poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1). Understanding the mechanisms of the PARP1 activity regulation within the cells is necessary for development of the PARP1-targeted antitumor therapy. This review is devoted to the studies of the role of the RNA-binding protein YB-1 in the PARP1-catalyzed PARylation. The mechanisms of PARP1 activity stimulation by YB-1 protein can possibly be extended to other RNA-binding proteins involved in the maintenance of the genome stability.

New Hybrid Compounds Combining Fragments of Usnic Acid and Thioether Are Inhibitors of Human Enzymes TDP1, TDP2 and PARP1

Tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (TDP1) catalyzes the cleavage of the phosphodiester bond between the tyrosine residue of topoisomerase 1 (TOP1) and the 3' phosphate of DNA in the single-strand break generated by TOP1. TDP1 promotes the cleavage of the stable DNA-TOP1 complexes with the TOP1 inhibitor topotecan, which is a clinically used anticancer drug. This article reports the synthesis and study of usnic acid thioether and sulfoxide derivatives that efficiently suppress TDP1 activity, with IC₅₀ values in the 1.4-25.2 μM range. The structure of the heterocyclic substituent introduced into the dibenzofuran core affects the TDP1 inhibitory efficiency of the compounds. A five-membered heterocyclic fragment was shown to be most pharmacophoric among the others. Sulfoxide derivatives were less cytotoxic than their thioester analogs. We observed an uncompetitive type of inhibition for the four most effective inhibitors of TDP1. The anticancer effect of TOP1 inhibitors can be enhanced by the simultaneous inhibition of PARP1, TDP1, and TDP2. Some of the compounds inhibited not only TDP1 but also TDP2 and/or PARP1, but at significantly higher concentration ranges than TDP1. Leader compound 10a showed promising synergy on HeLa cells in conjunction with the TOP1 inhibitor topotecan.

The scaffold protein XRCC1 stabilizes the formation of polβ/gap DNA and ligase IIIα/nick DNA complexes in base excision repair

The base excision repair (BER) pathway involves gap filling by DNA polymerase (pol) β and subsequent nick sealing by ligase IIIα. X-ray cross-complementing protein 1 (XRCC1), a nonenzymatic scaffold protein, assembles multiprotein complexes, although the mechanism by which XRCC1 orchestrates the final steps of coordinated BER remains incompletely defined. Here, using a combination of biochemical and biophysical approaches, we revealed that the polβ/XRCC1 complex increases the processivity of BER reactions after correct nucleotide insertion into gaps in DNA and enhances the handoff of nicked repair products to the final ligation step. Moreover, the mutagenic ligation of nicked repair intermediate following polβ 8-oxodGTP insertion is enhanced in the presence of XRCC1. Our results demonstrated a stabilizing effect of XRCC1 on the formation of polβ/dNTP/gap DNA and ligase IIIα/ATP/nick DNA catalytic ternary complexes. Real-time monitoring of protein–protein interactions and DNA-binding kinetics showed stronger binding of XRCC1 to polβ than to ligase IIIα or aprataxin, and higher affinity for nick DNA with undamaged or damaged ends than for one nucleotide gap repair intermediate. Finally, we demonstrated slight differences in stable polβ/XRCC1 complex formation, polβ and ligase IIIα protein interaction kinetics, and handoff process as a result of cancer-associated (P161L, R194W, R280H, R399Q, Y576S) and cerebellar ataxia-related (K431N) XRCC1 variants. Overall, our findings provide novel insights into the coordinating role of XRCC1 and the effect of its disease-associated variants on substrate-product channeling in multiprotein/DNA complexes for efficient BER.

Understanding APE1 cellular functions by the structural preference of exonuclease activities

Mammalian apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease 1 (APE1) has versatile enzymatic functions, including redox, endonuclease, and exonuclease activities. APE1 is thus broadly associated with pathways in DNA repair, cancer cell growth, and drug resistance. Unlike its AP site-specific endonuclease activity in Base excision repair (BER), the 3′-5′ exonucleolytic cleavage of APE1 using the same active site exhibits complex substrate selection patterns, which are key to the biological functions. This work aims to integrate molecular structural information and biocatalytic properties to deduce the substrate recognition mechanism of APE1 as an exonuclease and make connection to its diverse functionalities in the cell. In particular, an induced space-filling model emerges in which a bridge-like structure is formed by Arg177 and Met270 (RM bridge) upon substrate binding, causing the active site to adopt a long and narrow product pocket for hosting the leaving group of an AP site or the 3′-end nucleotide. Rather than distinguishing bases as other exonucleases, the hydrophobicity and steric hindrance due to the APE1 product pocket provides selectivity for substrate structures, such as matched or mismatched blunt-ended dsDNA, recessed dsDNA, gapped dsDNA, and nicked dsDNA with 3′-end overhang shorter than 2 nucleotides. These dsDNAs are similar to the native substrates in BER proofreading, BER for trinucleotide repeats (TNR), Nucleotide incision repair (NIR), DNA single-strand breaks (SSB), SSB with damaged bases, and apoptosis. Integration of in vivo studies, in vitro biochemical assays, and structural analysis is thus essential for linking the APE1 exonuclease activity to the specific roles in cellular functions.

Functional Roles of PARP2 in Assembling Protein-Protein Complexes Involved in Base Excision DNA Repair

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 2 (PARP2) participates in base excision repair (BER) alongside PARP1, but its functions are still under study. Here, we characterize binding affinities of PARP2 for other BER proteins (PARP1, APE1, Polβ, and XRCC1) and oligomerization states of the homo- and hetero-associated complexes using fluorescence-based and light scattering techniques. To compare PARP2 and PARP1 in the efficiency of PAR synthesis, in the absence and presence of protein partners, the size of PARP2 PARylated in various reaction conditions was measured. Unlike PARP1, PARP2 forms more dynamic complexes with common protein partners, and their stability is effectively modulated by DNA intermediates. Apparent binding affinity constants determined for homo- and hetero-oligomerized PARP1 and PARP2 provide evidence that the major form of PARP2 at excessive PARP1 level is their heterocomplex. Autoregulation of PAR elongation at high PARP and NAD⁺ concentrations is stronger for PARP2 than for PARP1, and the activity of PARP2 is more effectively inhibited by XRCC1. Moreover, the activity of both PARP1 and PARP2 is suppressed upon their heteroPARylation. Taken together, our findings suggest that PARP2 can function differently in BER, promoting XRCC1-dependent repair (similarly to PARP1) or an alternative XRCC1-independent mechanism via hetero-oligomerization with PARP1.

PARPs' impact on base excision DNA repair

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is one of immediate cellular responses to DNA damage and is catalyzed by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs). PARP1 is a well-known regulator of DNA repair. Another member of this family, PARP2, was discovered later. The study of PARP1 and PARP2 functions started a long time ago, and special attention has been given to the role of these enzymes in base excision repair. This review summarizes my lab's data on the functions of PARP1 and PARP2 in base excision repair as well as the results obtained in the course of our collaboration with Dr. Samuel H. Wilson.

The contribution of PARP1, PARP2 and poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation to base excision repair in the nucleosomal context

The regulation of repair processes including base excision repair (BER) in the presence of DNA damage is implemented by a cellular signal: poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation), which is catalysed by PARP1 and PARP2. Despite ample studies, it is far from clear how BER is regulated by PARPs and how the roles are distributed between the PARPs. Here, we investigated the effects of PARP1, PARP2 and PARylation on activities of the main BER enzymes (APE1, DNA polymerase β [Polβ] and DNA ligase IIIα [LigIIIα]) in combination with BER scaffold protein XRCC1 in the nucleosomal context. We constructed nucleosome core particles with midward- or outward-oriented damage. It was concluded that in most cases, the presence of PARP1 leads to the suppression of the activities of APE1, Polβ and to a lesser extent LigIIIα. PARylation by PARP1 attenuated this effect to various degrees depending on the enzyme. PARP2 had an influence predominantly on the last stage of BER: DNA sealing. Nonetheless, PARylation by PARP2 led to Polβ inhibition and to significant stimulation of LigIIIα activities in a NAD⁺-dependent manner. On the basis of the obtained and literature data, we suggest a hypothetical model of the contribution of PARP1 and PARP2 to BER.

Effect of Human XRCC1 Protein Oxidation on the Functional Activity of Its Complexes with the Key Enzymes of DNA Base Excision Repair

Base excision repair (BER) ensures correction of most abundant DNA lesions in mammals. The efficiency of this multistep DNA repair process that can occur via different pathways depends on the coordinated action of enzymes catalyzing its individual steps. The scaffold XRCC1 (X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 1) protein plays an important coordinating role in the repair of damaged bases and apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites via short-patch (SP) BER pathway, as well as in the repair of single-strand DNA breaks. In this study, we demonstrated for the first time in vitro formation of the ternary XRCC1 complex with the key enzymes of SP BER - DNA polymerase β (Polβ) and DNA ligase IIIα (LigIIIα) - using the fluorescence-based technique. It was found that Polβ directly interacts with LigIIIα, but their complex is less stable than the XRCC1-Polβ and XRCC1-LigIIIα complexes. The effect of XRCC1 oxidation and composition of the multiprotein complex on the efficiency of DNA synthesis and DNA ligation during DNA repair has been explored. We found that formation of the disulfide bond between Cys12 and Cys20 residues as a result of XRCC1 oxidation (previously shown to modulate the protein affinity for Polβ), affects the yield of the final product of SP BER and of non-ligated DNA intermediates (substrates of long-patch BER). The effect of XRCC1 oxidation on the final product yield depended on the presence of AP endonuclease 1. Together with the data from our previous work, the results of this study suggest an important role of XRCC1 oxidation in the fine regulation of formation of BER complexes and their functional activity.

APE1 distinguishes DNA substrates in exonucleolytic cleavage by induced space-filling

The exonuclease activity of Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) is responsible for processing matched/mismatched terminus in various DNA repair pathways and for removing nucleoside analogs associated with drug resistance. To fill in the gap of structural basis for exonucleolytic cleavage, we determine the APE1-dsDNA complex structures displaying end-binding. As an exonuclease, APE1 does not show base preference but can distinguish dsDNAs with different structural features. Integration with assaying enzyme activity and binding affinity for a variety of substrates reveals for the first time that both endonucleolytic and exonucleolytic cleavage can be understood by an induced space-filling model. Binding dsDNA induces RM (Arg176 and Met269) bridge that defines a long and narrow product pocket for exquisite machinery of substrate selection. Our study paves the way to comprehend end-processing of dsDNA in the cell and the drug resistance relating to APE1.

Quantifying Nanoscale Viscosity and Structures of Living Cells Nucleus from Mobility Measurements

Understanding the mobility of nano-objects in the eukaryotic cell nucleus, at multiple length-scales, is essential for dissecting nuclear structure-function relationships both in space and in time. Here, we demonstrate, using single-molecule fluorescent correlation spectroscopies, that motion of inert probes (proteins, polymers, or nanoparticles) with diameters ranging from 2.6 to 150 nm is mostly unobstructed in a nucleus. Supported by the analysis of electron tomography images, these results advocate the ∼150 nm-wide interchromosomal channels filled with the aqueous diluted protein solution. The nucleus is percolated by these channels to allow various cargos to migrate freely at the nanoscale. We determined the volume of interchromosomal channels in the HeLa cell nucleus to 237 ± 61 fL, which constitutes 34% of the cell nucleus volume. The volume fraction of mobile proteins in channels equals 16% ± 4%, and the concentration is 1 mM.

Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Endonuclease 1 and Tyrosyl-DNA Phosphodiesterase 1 Prevent Suicidal Covalent DNA-Protein Crosslink at Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Site

Bifunctional 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase (OGG1), a crucial DNA-repair enzyme, removes from DNA 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-oxoG) with following cleavage of the arising apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site. The major enzyme in eukaryotic cells that catalyzes the cleavage of AP sites is AP endonuclease 1 (APE1). Alternatively, AP sites can be cleaved by tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (TDP1) to initiate APE1-independent repair, thus expanding the ability of the base excision repair (BER) process. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) is a regulatory protein of DNA repair. PARP2 is also activated in response to DNA damage and can be regarded as the BER participant. Here we analyze PARP1 and PARP2 interactions with DNA intermediates of the initial stages of the BER process (8-oxoG and AP-site containing DNA) and their interplay with the proteins recognizing and processing these DNA structures focusing on OGG1. OGG1 as well as PARP1 and PARP2 form covalent complex with AP site-containing DNA without borohydride reduction. AP site incision by APE1 or TDP1 removal of protein adducts but not proteins’ PARylation prevent DNA-protein crosslinks.

Modulation of the Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Endonuclease Activity of Human APE1 and of Its Natural Polymorphic Variants by Base Excision Repair Proteins

Human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) is known to be a critical player of the base excision repair (BER) pathway. In general, BER involves consecutive actions of DNA glycosylases, AP endonucleases, DNA polymerases, and DNA ligases. It is known that these proteins interact with APE1 either at upstream or downstream steps of BER. Therefore, we may propose that even a minor disturbance of protein–protein interactions on the DNA template reduces coordination and repair efficiency. Here, the ability of various human DNA repair enzymes (such as DNA glycosylases OGG1, UNG2, and AAG; DNA polymerase Polβ; or accessory proteins XRCC1 and PCNA) to influence the activity of wild-type (WT) APE1 and its seven natural polymorphic variants (R221C, N222H, R237A, G241R, M270T, R274Q, and P311S) was tested. Förster resonance energy transfer–based kinetic analysis of abasic site cleavage in a model DNA substrate was conducted to detect the effects of interacting proteins on the activity of WT APE1 and its single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variants. The results revealed that WT APE1 activity was stimulated by almost all tested DNA repair proteins. For the SNP variants, the matters were more complicated. Analysis of two SNP variants, R237A and G241R, suggested that a positive charge in this area of the APE1 surface impairs the protein–protein interactions. In contrast, variant R221C (where the affected residue is located near the DNA-binding site) showed permanently lower activation relative to WT APE1, whereas neighboring SNP N222H did not cause a noticeable difference as compared to WT APE1. Buried substitution P311S had an inconsistent effect, whereas each substitution at the DNA-binding site, M270T and R274Q, resulted in the lowest stimulation by BER proteins. Protein–protein molecular docking was performed between repair proteins to identify amino acid residues involved in their interactions. The data uncovered differences in the effects of BER proteins on APE1, indicating an important role of protein–protein interactions in the coordination of the repair pathway.

The ligation of pol β mismatch insertion products governs the formation of promutagenic base excision DNA repair intermediates

DNA ligase I and DNA ligase III/XRCC1 complex catalyze the ultimate ligation step following DNA polymerase (pol) β nucleotide insertion during base excision repair (BER). Pol β Asn279 and Arg283 are the critical active site residues for the differentiation of an incoming nucleotide and a template base and the N-terminal domain of DNA ligase I mediates its interaction with pol β. Here, we show inefficient ligation of pol β insertion products with mismatched or damaged nucleotides, with the exception of a Watson–Crick-like dGTP insertion opposite T, using BER DNA ligases in vitro. Moreover, pol β N279A and R283A mutants deter the ligation of the promutagenic repair intermediates and the presence of N-terminal domain of DNA ligase I in a coupled reaction governs the channeling of the pol β insertion products. Our results demonstrate that the BER DNA ligases are compromised by subtle changes in all 12 possible noncanonical base pairs at the 3′-end of the nicked repair intermediate. These findings contribute to understanding of how the identity of the mismatch affects the substrate channeling of the repair pathway and the mechanism underlying the coordination between pol β and DNA ligase at the final ligation step to maintain the BER efficiency.

Molecular and structural characterization of disease-associated APE1 polymorphisms

Under conditions of oxidative stress, reactive oxygen species (ROS) continuously assault the structure of DNA resulting in oxidation and fragmentation of the nucleobases. When the nucleobase structure is altered, its base-pairing properties may also be altered, promoting mutations. Consequently, oxidative DNA damage is a major source of the mutation load that gives rise to numerous human maladies, including cancer. Base excision repair (BER) is the primary pathway tasked with removing and replacing mutagenic DNA base damage. Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) is a central enzyme with AP-endonuclease and 3' to 5' exonuclease functions during BER, and therefore is key to maintenance of genome stability. Polymorphisms, or SNPs, in the gene encoding APE1 (APEX1) have been identified among specific human populations and result in variants of APE1 with modified function. These defects in APE1 potentially result in impaired DNA repair capabilities and consequently an increased risk of disease for individuals within these populations. In the present study, we determined the X-ray crystal structures of three prevalent disease-associated APE1 SNPs (D148E, L104R, and R237C). Each APE1 SNP results in unique localized changes in protein structure, including protein dynamics and DNA binding contacts. Combined with comprehensive biochemical characterization, including pre-steady-state kinetic and DNA binding analyses, variant APE1:DNA complex structures with both AP-endonuclease and exonuclease substrates were analyzed to elucidate how these SNPs might perturb the two major repair functions employed by APE1 during BER.

Association between polymorphisms in the XRCC1 gene and male infertility risk: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) might correlate with male infertility susceptibility. This association has been described; however, the findings remain inconsistent. Consequently, this meta-analysis was conducted to characterize the relationship between XRCC1 SNPs and male infertility susceptibility.

METHODS/MAIN RESULTS

Studies were systematically searched in databases to evaluate the association between SNPs of XRCC1 and infertility in males. The effect measures chosen were the 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) and odds ratios (ORs). A total of 7 studies, including 6 case-controlled studies on XRCC1 Arg399Gln and 3 case-controlled studies on XRCC1 Arg194Trp, were included. Ultimately, the results of this analysis revealed that XRCC1 Arg399Gln SNPs were significantly associated with infertility in males in homozygote comparisons (GG vs GA+AA: OR = 0.614, 95% CI: 0.40-0.937, P = .024). This meta-analysis did not demonstrate a relationship between XRCC1 Arg194Trp and male infertility risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicated that XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism was associated with a significantly decreased male infertility risk, but not XRCC1 Arg194Trp.

Functional Role of N-Terminal Extension of Human AP Endonuclease 1 In Coordination of Base Excision DNA Repair via Protein-Protein Interactions

Human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) has multiple functions in base excision DNA repair (BER) and other cellular processes. Its eukaryote-specific N-terminal extension plays diverse regulatory roles in interaction with different partners. Here, we explored its involvement in interaction with canonical BER proteins. Using fluorescence based-techniques, we compared binding affinities of the full-length and N-terminally truncated forms of APE1 (APE1NΔ35 and APE1NΔ61) for functionally and structurally different DNA polymerase β (Polβ), X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 1 (XRCC1), and poly(adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1), in the absence and presence of model DNA intermediates. Influence of the N-terminal truncation on binding the AP site-containing DNA was additionally explored. These data suggest that the interaction domain for proteins is basically formed by the conserved catalytic core of APE1. The N-terminal extension being capable of dynamically interacting with the protein and DNA partners is mostly responsible for DNA-dependent modulation of protein–protein interactions. Polβ, XRCC1, and PARP1 were shown to more efficiently regulate the endonuclease activity of the full-length protein than that of APE1NΔ61, further suggesting contribution of the N-terminal extension to BER coordination. Our results advance the understanding of functional roles of eukaryote-specific protein extensions in highly coordinated BER processes.

Analysis of Brightness of a Single Fluorophore for Quantitative Characterization of Biochemical Reactions

Intrinsic molecular brightness (MB) is a number of emitted photons per second per molecule. When a substrate labeled by a fluorophore and a second unlabeled substrate form a complex in solution, the MB of the fluorophore changes. Here we use this change to determine the equilibrium constant (K) for the formation of the complex at pM concentrations. To illustrate this method, we used a reaction of DNA hybridization, where only one of the strands was fluorescently labeled. We determined K at the substrate concentrations from 80 pM to 30 nM. We validated this method against Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET). This method is much simpler than FRET as it requires only one fluorophore in the complex with a very small (a f̃ew percent) change in MB.

Impact of PARP1, PARP2 & PARP3 on the Base Excision Repair of Nucleosomal DNA

DNA is constantly attacked by different damaging agents; therefore, it requires frequent repair. On the one hand, the base excision repair (BER) system is responsible for the repair of the most frequent DNA lesions. On the other hand, the formation of poly(ADP-ribose) is one of the main DNA damage response reactions that is catalysed by members of the PARP family. PARP1, which belongs to the PARP family and performs approximately 90% of PAR synthesis in cells, could be considered a main regulator of the BER process. Most of the experimental data concerning BER investigation have been obtained using naked DNA. However, in the context of the eukaryotic cell, DNA is compacted in the nucleus, and the lowest compaction level is represented by the nucleosome. Thus, the organization of DNA into the nucleosome impacts the DNA-protein interactions that are involved in BER processes. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation) is thought to regulate the initiation of the BER process at the chromatin level. In this review, we focus on the mechanisms involved in BER in the nucleosomal context and the potential effect of PARylation, which is catalysed by DNA-dependent PARP1, PARP2 and PARP3 proteins, on this process.

DNA complexes with human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1: structural insights revealed by pulsed dipolar EPR with orthogonal spin labeling

A DNA molecule is under continuous influence of endogenous and exogenous damaging factors, which produce a variety of DNA lesions. Apurinic/apyrimidinic sites (abasic or AP sites) are among the most common DNA lesions. In this work, we applied pulse dipolar electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy in combination with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to investigate in-depth conformational changes in DNA containing an AP site and in a complex of this DNA with AP endonuclease 1 (APE1). For this purpose, triarylmethyl (TAM)-based spin labels were attached to the 5' ends of an oligonucleotide duplex, and nitroxide spin labels were introduced into APE1. In this way, we created a system that enabled monitoring the conformational changes of the main APE1 substrate by EPR. In addition, we were able to trace substrate-to-product transformation in this system. The use of different (orthogonal) spin labels in the enzyme and in the DNA substrate has a crucial advantage allowing for detailed investigation of local damage and conformational changes in AP-DNA alone and in its complex with APE1.

Graphene Oxide-Assisted and DNA-Modulated SERS of AuCu Alloy for the Fabrication of Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Endonuclease 1 Biosensor

Fabrication of high-performance surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) biosensors relies on the coordination of SERS substrates and sensing strategies. Herein, a SERS active AuCu alloy with a starfish-like structure is prepared using a surfactant-free method. By covering the anisotropic AuCu alloy with graphene oxide (GO), enhanced SERS activity is obtained owing to graphene-enhanced Raman scattering and assembly of Raman reporters. Besides, stability of SERS is promoted based on the protection of GO to the AuCu alloy. Meanwhile, it is found that SERS activity of AuCu/GO can be regulated by DNA. The regulation is sequence and length dual-dependent, and short polyT reveals the strongest ability of enhancing the SERS activity. Relying on this phenomenon, a SERS biosensor is designed to quantify apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1). Because of the APE1-induced cycling amplification, the biosensor is able to detect APE1 sensitively and selectively. In addition, APE1 in human serum is analyzed by the SERS biosensor and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The data from the SERS method are superior to that from ELISA, indicating great potential of this biosensor in clinical applications.

Human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 is modified in vitro by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 under control of the structure of damaged DNA

Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) is an essential multifunctional protein in mammals involved in base excision DNA repair (BER), regulation of gene expression and RNA metabolism. Its major enzymatic function is incision of AP sites. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) modifies itself and target proteins with poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR), contributing to regulation of many processes. To understand molecular basis of functional cooperation between APE1 and PARP1 in BER, we examined PAR-binding activity and ADP-ribosylation of human APE1 in comparison with known targets of PARP1, using the full-length, N-terminally truncated and catalytically inactive forms of APE1. The protein binds preferentially large ADP-ribose polymers, being very similar to DNA polymerase β (Polβ) but contrasting with the scaffold XRCC1 protein. The interaction with PAR involves the universally conserved catalytic portion and the eukaryote-specific extension of APE1. The ADP-ribosylation of APE1 depends on the structure of PARP1-activating DNA, contrasting APE1 with Polβ and XRCC1. Relative levels of APE1 modification in the presence of different DNA substrates were found to correlate with affinities of the DNAs for APE1 and substrate activities in the enzymatic incision, suggesting the ADP-ribosylation to occur within the DNA-mediated ternary complex. This conclusion was confirmed by importance of the length of DNA region 3' to the AP site for the modification. Deletion of the N-terminal extension of APE1 produced no significant influence on both the ADP-ribosylation efficiency and hydrolytic stability of the modified protein, suggesting localization of target amino acids in the conserved catalytic portion. The most efficient ADP-ribosylation of the catalytically inactive APE1 mutant was shown to reduce the level of PARP1 automodification, suggesting possible role of APE1 in modulating PARP1 activity. Our data on primary role of DNA in controlling the PARP-catalysed modification provide new insights into mechanisms of protein targeting for ADP-ribosylation.

Complex genetic interactions between DNA polymerase β and the NHEJ ligase

Mammalian cells possess multiple pathways for repairing various types of DNA damage. Although the molecular mechanisms of each DNA repair pathway have been analyzed by biochemical analysis and cell biological analysis, interplay between different pathways has not been fully elucidated. In this study, using human Nalm-6-mutant cell lines, we analyzed the relationship between the base excision repair factor DNA polymerase β (POLβ) and DNA ligase IV (LIG4), which is essential for DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair by non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). We found that cells lacking both POLβ and LIG4 grew significantly more slowly than either single mutant, indicating cooperative functions of the two proteins in normal cell growth. To further investigate the genetic interaction between POLβ and LIG4, we examined DNA damage sensitivity of the mutant cell lines. Our results suggested that NHEJ acts as a backup pathway for repairing alkylation damage (when converted into DSBs) in the absence of POLβ. Surprisingly, despite the critical role of POLβ in alkylation damage repair, cells lacking POLβ exhibited increased resistance to camptothecin (a topoisomerase I inhibitor that induces DNA single-strand breaks), irrespective of the presence or absence of LIG4. A LIG4-independent increased resistance associated with POLβ loss was also observed with ionizing radiation; however, cells lacking both POLβ and LIG4 were more radiosensitive than either single mutant. Taken together, our findings provide novel insight into the complex interplay between different DNA repair pathways.

A Single-Molecule Atomic Force Microscopy Study of PARP1 and PARP2 Recognition of Base Excision Repair DNA Intermediates

Nuclear poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases 1 and 2 (PARP1 and PARP2) catalyze the synthesis of poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) and use NAD⁺ as a substrate for the polymer synthesis. Both PARP1 and PARP2 are involved in DNA damage response pathways and function as sensors of DNA breaks, including temporary single-strand breaks formed during DNA repair. Consistently, with a role in DNA repair, PARP activation requires its binding to a damaged DNA site, which initiates PAR synthesis. Here we use atomic force microscopy to characterize at the single-molecule level the interaction of PARP1 and PARP2 with long DNA substrates containing a single damage site and representing intermediates of the short-patch base excision repair (BER) pathway. We demonstrated that PARP1 has higher affinity for early intermediates of BER than PARP2, whereas both PARPs efficiently interact with the nick and may contribute to regulation of the final ligation step. The binding of a DNA repair intermediate by PARPs involved a PARP monomer or dimer depending on the type of DNA damage. PARP dimerization influences the affinity of these proteins to DNA and affects their enzymatic activity: the dimeric form is more effective in PAR synthesis in the case of PARP2 but is less effective in the case of PARP1. PARP2 suppresses PAR synthesis catalyzed by PARP1 after single-strand breaks formation. Our study suggests that the functions of PARP1 and PARP2 overlap in BER after a site cleavage and provides evidence for a role of PARP2 in the regulation of PARP1 activity.

Interplay between DNA Polymerases and DNA Ligases: Influence on Substrate Channeling and the Fidelity of DNA Ligation

DNA ligases are a highly conserved group of nucleic acid enzymes that play an essential role in DNA repair, replication, and recombination. This review focuses on functional interaction between DNA polymerases and DNA ligases in the repair of single- and double-strand DNA breaks, and discusses the notion that the substrate channeling during DNA polymerase-mediated nucleotide insertion coupled to DNA ligation could be a mechanism to minimize the release of potentially mutagenic repair intermediates. Evidence suggesting that DNA ligases are essential for cell viability includes the fact that defects or insufficiency in DNA ligase are casually linked to genome instability. In the future, it may be possible to develop small molecule inhibitors of mammalian DNA ligases and/or their functional protein partners that potentiate the effects of chemotherapeutic compounds and improve cancer treatment outcomes.

Transient protein-protein complexes in base excision repair

Transient protein-protein complexes are of great importance for organizing multiple enzymatic reactions into productive reaction pathways. Base excision repair (BER), a process of critical importance for maintaining genome stability against a plethora of DNA-damaging factors, involves several enzymes, including DNA glycosylases, AP endonucleases, DNA polymerases, DNA ligases and accessory proteins acting sequentially on the same damaged site in DNA. Rather than being assembled into one stable multisubunit complex, these enzymes pass the repair intermediates between them in a highly coordinated manner. In this review, we discuss the nature and the role of transient complexes arising during BER as deduced from structural and kinetic data. Almost all of the transient complexes are DNA-mediated, although some may also exist in solution and strengthen under specific conditions. The best-studied example, the interactions between DNA glycosylases and AP endonucleases, is discussed in more detail to provide a framework for distinguishing between stable and transient complexes based on the kinetic data. Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

SUMOylation coordinates BERosome assembly in active DNA demethylation during cell differentiation

During active DNA demethylation, 5-methylcytosine (5mC) is oxidized by TET proteins to 5-formyl-/5-carboxylcytosine (5fC/5caC) for replacement by unmethylated C by TDG-initiated DNA base excision repair (BER). Base excision generates fragile abasic sites (AP-sites) in DNA and has to be coordinated with subsequent repair steps to limit accumulation of genome destabilizing secondary DNA lesions. Here, we show that 5fC/5caC is generated at a high rate in genomes of differentiating mouse embryonic stem cells and that SUMOylation and the BER protein XRCC1 play critical roles in orchestrating TDG-initiated BER of these lesions. SUMOylation of XRCC1 facilitates physical interaction with TDG and promotes the assembly of a TDG-BER core complex. Within this TDG-BERosome, SUMO is transferred from XRCC1 and coupled to the SUMO acceptor lysine in TDG, promoting its dissociation while assuring the engagement of the BER machinery to complete demethylation. Although well-studied, the biological importance of TDG SUMOylation has remained obscure. Here, we demonstrate that SUMOylation of TDG suppresses DNA strand-break accumulation and toxicity to PARP inhibition in differentiating mESCs and is essential for neural lineage commitment.

Novel group of tyrosyl-DNA-phosphodiesterase 1 inhibitors based on disaccharide nucleosides as drug prototypes for anti-cancer therapy

A new class of tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (TDP1) inhibitors based on disaccharide nucleosides was identified. TDP1 plays an essential role in the resistance of cancer cells to currently used antitumour drugs based on Top1 inhibitors such as topotecan and irinotecan. The most effective inhibitors investigated in this study have IC50 values (half-maximal inhibitory concentration) in 0.4-18.5 µM range and demonstrate relatively low own cytotoxicity along with significant synergistic effect in combination with anti-cancer drug topotecan. Moreover, kinetic parameters of the enzymatic reaction and fluorescence anisotropy were measured using different types of DNA-biosensors to give a sufficient insight into the mechanism of inhibitor's action.

Human AP-endonuclease (Ape1) activity on telomeric G4 structures is modulated by acetylatable lysine residues in the N-terminal sequence

Loss of telomeres stability is a hallmark of cancer cells. Exposed telomeres are prone to aberrant end-joining reactions leading to chromosomal fusions and translocations. Human telomeres contain repeated TTAGGG elements, in which the 3' exposed strand may adopt a G-quadruplex (G4) structure. The guanine-rich regions of telomeres are hotspots for oxidation forming 8-oxoguanine, a lesion that is handled by the base excision repair (BER) pathway. One key player of this pathway is Ape1, the main human endonuclease processing abasic sites. Recent evidences showed an important role for Ape1 in telomeric physiology, but the molecular details regulating Ape1 enzymatic activities on G4-telomeric sequences are lacking. Through a combination of in vitro assays, we demonstrate that Ape1 can bind and process different G4 structures and that this interaction involves specific acetylatable lysine residues (i.e. K^27/31/32/35) present in the unstructured N-terminal sequence of the protein. The cleavage of an abasic site located in a G4 structure by Ape1 depends on the DNA conformation or the position of the lesion and on electrostatic interactions between the protein and the nucleic acids. Moreover, Ape1 mutants mimicking the acetylated protein display increased cleavage activity for abasic sites. We found that nucleophosmin (NPM1), which binds the N-terminal sequence of Ape1, plays a role in modulating telomere length and Ape1 activity at abasic G4 structures. Thus, the Ape1 N-terminal sequence is an important relay site for regulating the enzyme's activity on G4-telomeric sequences, and specific acetylatable lysine residues constitute key regulatory sites of Ape1 enzymatic activity dynamics at telomeres.