A network of eIF2β interactions with eIF1 and Met-tRNAi promotes accurate start codon selection by the translation preinitiation complex

Structural basis of AUC codon discrimination during translation initiation in yeast

In eukaryotic translation initiation, the 48S preinitiation complex (PIC) scans the 5' untranslated region of mRNAs to search for the cognate start codon (AUG) with assistance from various eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs). Cognate start codon recognition is precise, rejecting near-cognate codons with a single base difference. However, the structural basis of discrimination of near-cognate start codons was not known. We have captured multiple yeast 48S PICs with a near-cognate AUC codon at the P-site, revealing that the AUC codon induces instability in the codon-anticodon at the P-site, leading to a disordered N-terminal tail of eIF1A. Following eIF1 dissociation, the N-terminal domain of eIF5 fails to occupy the vacant eIF1 position, and eIF2β becomes flexible. Consequently, 48S with an AUC codon is less favourable for initiation. Furthermore, we observe hitherto unreported metastable states of the eIF2-GTP-Met-tRNAMet ternary complex, where the eIF2β helix-turn-helix domain may facilitate eIF5 association by preventing eIF1 rebinding to 48S PIC. Finally, a swivelled head conformation of 48S PIC appears crucial for discriminating incorrect and selection of the correct codon-anticodon pair during translation initiation.

Structural basis for translational control by the human 48S initiation complex

The selection of an open reading frame (ORF) for translation of eukaryotic mRNA relies on remodeling of the scanning 48S initiation complex into an elongation-ready 80S ribosome. Using cryo-electron microscopy, we visualize the key commitment steps orchestrating 48S remodeling in humans. The mRNA Kozak sequence facilitates mRNA scanning in the 48S open state and stabilizes the 48S closed state by organizing the contacts of eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) and ribosomal proteins and by reconfiguring mRNA structure. GTPase-triggered large-scale fluctuations of 48S-bound eIF2 facilitate eIF5B recruitment, transfer of initiator tRNA from eIF2 to eIF5B and the release of eIF5 and eIF2. The 48S-bound multisubunit eIF3 complex controls ribosomal subunit joining by coupling eIF exchange to gradual displacement of the eIF3c N-terminal domain from the intersubunit interface. These findings reveal the structural mechanism of ORF selection in human cells and explain how eIF3 could function in the context of the 80S ribosome.

eIF2β zinc-binding domain interacts with the eIF2γ subunit through the guanine nucleotide binding interface to promote Met-tRNAiMet binding

The heterotrimeric eIF2 complex consists of a core eIF2γ subunit to which binds eIF2α and eIF2β subunits and plays an important role in delivering the Met-tRNAiMet to the 40S ribosome and start codon selection. The intricacies of eIF2β-γ interaction in promoting Met-tRNAiMet binding are not clearly understood. Previously, the zinc-binding domain (ZBD) eIF2βS264Y mutation was reported to cause Met-tRNAiMet binding defect due to the intrinsic GTPase activity. We showed that the eIF2βS264Y mutation has eIF2β-γ interaction defect. Consistently, the eIF2βT238A intragenic suppressor mutation restored the eIF2β-γ and Met-tRNAiMet binding. The eIF2β-ZBD residues Asn252Asp and Arg253Ala mutation caused Met-tRNAiMet binding defect that was partially rescued by the eIF2βT238A mutation, suggesting the eIF2β-ZBD modulates Met-tRNAiMet binding. The suppressor mutation rescued the translation initiation fidelity defect of the eIF2γN135D SW-I mutation and eIF2βF217A/Q221A double mutation in the HTH domain. The eIF2βT238A suppressor mutation could not rescue the eIF2β binding defect of the eIF2γV281K mutation; however, combining the eIF2βS264Y mutation with the eIF2γV281K mutation was lethal. In addition to the previously known interaction of eIF2β with the eIF2γ subunit via its α1-helix, the eIF2β-ZBD also interacts with the eIF2γ subunit via guanine nucleotide-binding interface; thus, the eIF2β-γ interacts via two distinct binding sites.

The molecular basis of translation initiation and its regulation in eukaryotes

The regulation of gene expression is fundamental for life. Whereas the role of transcriptional regulation of gene expression has been studied for several decades, it has been clear over the past two decades that post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression, of which translation regulation is a major part, can be equally important. Translation can be divided into four main stages: initiation, elongation, termination and ribosome recycling. Translation is controlled mainly during its initiation, a process which culminates in a ribosome positioned with an initiator tRNA over the start codon and, thus, ready to begin elongation of the protein chain. mRNA translation has emerged as a powerful tool for the development of innovative therapies, yet the detailed mechanisms underlying the complex process of initiation remain unclear. Recent studies in yeast and mammals have started to shed light on some previously unclear aspects of this process. In this Review, we discuss the current state of knowledge on eukaryotic translation initiation and its regulation in health and disease. Specifically, we focus on recent advances in understanding the processes involved in assembling the 43S pre-initiation complex and its recruitment by the cap-binding complex eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4F (eIF4F) at the 5' end of mRNA. In addition, we discuss recent insights into ribosome scanning along the 5' untranslated region of mRNA and selection of the start codon, which culminates in joining of the 60S large subunit and formation of the 80S initiation complex.

Protection of eIF2B from inhibitory phosphorylated eIF2: A viral strategy to maintain mRNA translation during the PKR-triggered integrated stress response

The integrated stress response (ISR) protects cells from a variety of insults. Once elicited (e.g., by virus infections), it eventually leads to the block of mRNA translation. Central to the ISR are the interactions between translation initiation factors eIF2 and eIF2B. Under normal conditions, eIF2 drives the initiation of protein synthesis through hydrolysis of GTP, which becomes replenished by the guanine nucleotide exchange factor eIF2B. The antiviral branch of the ISR is activated by the RNA-activated kinase PKR which phosphorylates eIF2, thereby converting it into an eIF2B inhibitor. Here, we describe the recently solved structures of eIF2B in complex with eIF2 and a novel escape strategy used by viruses. While unphosphorylated eIF2 interacts with eIF2B in its "productive" conformation, phosphorylated eIF2 [eIF2(αP)] engages a different binding cavity on eIF2B and forces it into the "nonproductive" conformation that prohibits guanine nucleotide exchange factor activity. It is well established that viruses express so-called PKR antagonists that interfere with double-strand RNA, PKR itself, or eIF2. However recently, three taxonomically unrelated viruses were reported to encode antagonists targeting eIF2B instead. For one antagonist, the S segment nonstructural protein of Sandfly fever Sicilian virus, atomic structures showed that it occupies the eIF2(αP)-binding cavity on eIF2B without imposing a switch to the nonproductive conformation. S segment nonstructural protein thus antagonizes the activity of PKR by protecting eIF2B from inhibition by eIF2(αP). As the ISR and specifically eIF2B are central to neuroprotection and a wide range of genetic and age-related diseases, these developments may open new possibilities for treatments.

Translation initiation at AUG and non-AUG triplets in plants

In plants and other eukaryotes, precise selection of translation initiation site (TIS) on mRNAs shapes the proteome in response to cellular events or environmental cues. The canonical translation of mRNAs initiates at a 5' proximal AUG codon in a favorable context. However, the coding and non-coding regions of plant genomes contain numerous unannotated alternative AUG and non-AUG TISs. Determining how and why these unexpected and prevalent TISs are activated in plants has emerged as an exciting research area. In this review, we focus on the selection of plant TISs and highlight studies that revealed previously unannotated TISs used in vivo via comparative genomics and genome-wide profiling of ribosome positioning and protein N-terminal ends. The biological signatures of non-AUG TIS-initiated open reading frames (ORFs) in plants are also discussed. We describe what is understood about cis-regulatory RNA elements and trans-acting eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) in the site selection for translation initiation by featuring the findings in plants along with supporting findings in non-plant species. The prevalent, unannotated TISs provide a hidden reservoir of ORFs that likely help reshape plant proteomes in response to developmental or environmental cues. These findings underscore the importance of understanding the mechanistic basis of TIS selection to functionally annotate plant genomes, especially for crops with large genomes.

Molecular mechanisms of eukaryotic translation fidelity and their associations with diseases

Converting genetic information into functional proteins is a complex, multi-step process, with each step being tightly regulated to ensure the accuracy of translation, which is critical to cellular health. In recent years, advances in modern biotechnology, especially the development of cryo-electron microscopy and single-molecule techniques, have enabled a clearer understanding of the mechanisms of protein translation fidelity. Although there are many studies on the regulation of protein translation in prokaryotes, and the basic elements of translation are highly conserved in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, there are still great differences in the specific regulatory mechanisms. This review describes how eukaryotic ribosomes and translation factors regulate protein translation and ensure translation accuracy. However, a certain frequency of translation errors does occur in translation, so we describe diseases that arise when the rate of translation errors reaches or exceeds a threshold of cellular tolerance.

Inhibitors of eIF4G1-eIF1 uncover its regulatory role of ER/UPR stress-response genes independent of eIF2α-phosphorylation

During translation initiation, eIF4G1 dynamically interacts with eIF4E and eIF1. While the role of eIF4E-eIF4G1 is well established, the regulatory functions of eIF4G1-eIF1 are poorly understood. Here, we report the identification of the eIF4G1-eIF1 inhibitors i14G1-10 and i14G1-12. i14G1s directly bind eIF4G1 and inhibit translation in vitro and in the cell, and their effects on translation are dependent on eIF4G1 levels. Translatome analyses revealed that i14G1s mimic eIF1 and eIF4G1 perturbations on the stringency of start codon selection and the opposing roles of eIF1-eIF4G1 in scanning-dependent and scanning-independent short 5' untranslated region (UTR) translation. Remarkably, i14G1s activate ER/unfolded protein response (UPR) stress-response genes via enhanced ribosome loading, elevated 5'UTR translation at near-cognate AUGs, and unexpected concomitant up-regulation of coding-region translation. These effects are, at least in part, independent of eIF2α-phosphorylation. Interestingly, eIF4G1-eIF1 interaction itself is negatively regulated by ER stress and mTOR inhibition. Thus, i14G1s uncover an unknown mechanism of ER/UPR translational stress response and are valuable research tools and potential drugs against diseases exhibiting dysregulated translation.

Selection of start codon during mRNA scanning in eukaryotic translation initiation

Accurate and high-speed scanning and subsequent selection of the correct start codon are important events in protein synthesis. Eukaryotic mRNAs have long 5′ UTRs that are inspected for the presence of a start codon by the ribosomal 48S pre-initiation complex (PIC). However, the conformational state of the 48S PIC required for inspecting every codon is not clearly understood. Here, atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and energy calculations suggest that the scanning conformation of 48S PIC may reject all but 4 (GUG, CUG, UUG and ACG) of the 63 non-AUG codons, and initiation factor eIF1 is crucial for this discrimination. We provide insights into the possible role of initiation factors eIF1, eIF1A, eIF2α and eIF2β in scanning. Overall, the study highlights how the scanning conformation of ribosomal 48S PIC acts as a coarse selectivity checkpoint for start codon selection and scans long 5′ UTRs in eukaryotic mRNAs with accuracy and high speed.

Molecular simulations of start codon selection by the eukaryotic ribosome during mRNA scanning provide further insight into high speed of scanning and how initiation factors contribute toward codon-anticodon-ribosome network stability.

Post-transcriptional and translational control of the morphology and virulence in human fungal pathogens

Host-pathogen interactions at the molecular level are the key to fungal pathogenesis. Fungal pathogens utilize several mechanisms such as adhesion, invasion, phenotype switching and metabolic adaptations, to survive in the host environment and respond. Post-transcriptional and translational regulations have emerged as key regulatory mechanisms ensuring the virulence and survival of fungal pathogens. Through these regulations, fungal pathogens effectively alter their protein pool, respond to various stress, and undergo morphogenesis, leading to efficient and comprehensive changes in fungal physiology. The regulation of virulence through post-transcriptional and translational regulatory mechanisms is mediated through mRNA elements (cis factors) or effector molecules (trans factors). The untranslated regions upstream and downstream of the mRNA, as well as various RNA-binding proteins involved in translation initiation or circularization of the mRNA, play pivotal roles in the regulation of morphology and virulence by influencing protein synthesis, protein isoforms, and mRNA stability. Therefore, post-transcriptional and translational mechanisms regulating the morphology, virulence and drug-resistance processes in fungal pathogens can be the target for new therapeutics. With improved "omics" technologies, these regulatory mechanisms are increasingly coming to the forefront of basic biology and drug discovery. This review aims to discuss various modes of post-transcriptional and translation regulations, and how these mechanisms exert influence in the virulence and morphogenesis of fungal pathogens.

Global phosphoproteomics pinpoints uncharted Gcn2-mediated mechanisms of translational control

The conserved Gcn2 protein kinase mediates cellular adaptations to amino acid limitation through translational control of gene expression that is exclusively executed by phosphorylation of the α-subunit of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2α). Using quantitative phosphoproteomics, however, we discovered that Gcn2 targets auxiliary effectors to modulate translation. Accordingly, Gcn2 also phosphorylates the β-subunit of the trimeric eIF2 G protein complex to promote its association with eIF5, which prevents spontaneous nucleotide exchange on eIF2 and thereby restricts the recycling of the initiator methionyl-tRNA-bound eIF2-GDP ternary complex in amino-acid-starved cells. This mechanism contributes to the inhibition of translation initiation in parallel to the sequestration of the nucleotide exchange factor eIF2B by phosphorylated eIF2α. Gcn2 further phosphorylates Gcn20 to antagonize, in an inhibitory feedback loop, the formation of the Gcn2-stimulatory Gcn1-Gcn20 complex. Thus, Gcn2 plays a substantially more intricate role in controlling translation initiation than hitherto appreciated.

Structural Differences in Translation Initiation between Pathogenic Trypanosomatids and Their Mammalian Hosts

Canonical mRNA translation in eukaryotes begins with the formation of the 43S pre-initiation complex (PIC). Its assembly requires binding of initiator Met-tRNA_i^Met and several eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) to the small ribosomal subunit (40S). Compared to their mammalian hosts, trypanosomatids present significant structural differences in their 40S, suggesting substantial variability in translation initiation. Here, we determine the structure of the 43S PIC from Trypanosoma cruzi, the parasite causing Chagas disease. Our structure shows numerous specific features, such as the variant eIF3 structure and its unique interactions with the large rRNA expansion segments (ESs) 9^S, 7^S, and 6^S, and the association of a kinetoplastid-specific DDX60-like helicase. It also reveals the 40S-binding site of the eIF5 C-terminal domain and structures of key terminal tails of several conserved eIFs underlying their activities within the PIC. Our results are corroborated by glutathione S-transferase (GST) pull-down assays in both human and T. cruzi and mass spectrometry data.

•

Structure of the 43S pre-initiation complex from Trypanosoma cruzi is solved at 3.33 Å

•

The kinetoplastids’ eIF3 core is a septamer that binds mainly the unique, extended ES7^s

•

A kinetoplastid-specific DDX60-like helicase binds to the 43S PIC entry pore

•

The 40S positions of eIF5-CTD and key tails of several eIFs are determined

eIF2α interactions with mRNA control accurate start codon selection by the translation preinitiation complex

In translation initiation, AUG recognition triggers rearrangement of the 48S preinitiation complex (PIC) from an open conformation to a closed state with more tightly-bound Met-tRNAi. Cryo-EM structures have revealed interactions unique to the closed complex between arginines R55/R57 of eIF2α with mRNA, including the -3 nucleotide of the 'Kozak' context. We found that R55/R57 substitutions reduced recognition of a UUG start codon at HIS4 in Sui- cells (Ssu- phenotype); and in vitro, R55G-R57E accelerated dissociation of the eIF2·GTP·Met-tRNAi ternary complex (TC) from reconstituted PICs with a UUG start codon, indicating destabilization of the closed complex. R55/R57 substitutions also decreased usage of poor-context AUGs in SUI1 and GCN4 mRNAs in vivo. In contrast, eIF2α-R53 interacts with the rRNA backbone only in the open complex, and the R53E substitution enhanced initiation at a UUG codon (Sui- phenotype) and poor-context AUGs, while reducing the rate of TC loading (Gcd- phenotype) in vivo. Consistently, R53E slowed TC binding to the PIC while decreasing TC dissociation at UUG codons in vitro, indicating destabilization of the open complex. Thus, distinct interactions of eIF2α with rRNA or mRNA stabilize first the open, and then closed, conformation of the PIC to influence the accuracy of initiation in vivo.

5'-UTR recruitment of the translation initiation factor eIF4GI or DAP5 drives cap-independent translation of a subset of human mRNAs

During unfavorable conditions (e.g. tumor hypoxia or viral infection), canonical, cap-dependent mRNA translation is suppressed in human cells. Nonetheless, a subset of physiologically important mRNAs (e.g. hypoxia-inducible factor 1α [HIF-1α], fibroblast growth factor 9 [FGF-9], and p53) is still translated by an unknown, cap-independent mechanism. Additionally, expression levels of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4GI (eIF4GI) and of its homolog, death-associated protein 5 (DAP5), are elevated. By examining the 5' UTRs of HIF-1α, FGF-9, and p53 mRNAs and using fluorescence anisotropy binding studies, luciferase reporter-based in vitro translation assays, and mutational analyses, we demonstrate here that eIF4GI and DAP5 specifically bind to the 5' UTRs of these cap-independently translated mRNAs. Surprisingly, we found that the eIF4E-binding domain of eIF4GI increases not only the binding affinity but also the selectivity among these mRNAs. We further demonstrate that the affinities of eIF4GI and DAP5 binding to these 5' UTRs correlate with the efficiency with which these factors drive cap-independent translation of these mRNAs. Integrating the results of our binding and translation assays, we conclude that eIF4GI or DAP5 is critical for recruitment of a specific subset of mRNAs to the ribosome, providing mechanistic insight into their cap-independent translation.

eIF1 discriminates against suboptimal initiation sites to prevent excessive uORF translation genome-wide

The translation preinitiation complex (PIC) scans the mRNA for an AUG codon in a favorable context. Previous findings suggest that the factor eIF1 discriminates against non-AUG start codons by impeding full accommodation of Met-tRNA_i in the P site of the 40S ribosomal subunit, necessitating eIF1 dissociation for start codon selection. Consistent with this, yeast eIF1 substitutions that weaken its binding to the PIC increase initiation at UUG codons on a mutant his4 mRNA and particular synthetic mRNA reporters; and also at the AUG start codon of the mRNA for eIF1 itself owing to its poor Kozak context. It was not known however whether such eIF1 mutants increase initiation at suboptimal start codons genome-wide. By ribosome profiling, we show that the eIF1-L96P variant confers increased translation of numerous upstream open reading frames (uORFs) initiating with either near-cognate codons (NCCs) or AUGs in poor context. The increased uORF translation is frequently associated with the reduced translation of the downstream main coding sequences (CDS). Initiation is also elevated at certain NCCs initiating amino-terminal extensions, including those that direct mitochondrial localization of the GRS1 and ALA1 products, and at a small set of main CDS AUG codons with especially poor context, including that of eIF1 itself. Thus, eIF1 acts throughout the yeast translatome to discriminate against NCC start codons and AUGs in poor context; and impairing this function enhances the repressive effects of uORFs on CDS translation and alters the ratios of protein isoforms translated from near-cognate versus AUG start codons.

Non-AUG start codons: Expanding and regulating the small and alternative ORFeome

Recent ribosome profiling and proteomic studies have revealed the presence of thousands of novel coding sequences, referred to as small open reading frames (sORFs), in prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes. These genes have defied discovery via traditional genomic tools not only because they tend to be shorter than standard gene annotation length cutoffs, but also because they are, as a class, enriched in sequence properties previously assumed to be unusual, including non-AUG start codons. In this review, we summarize what is currently known about the incidence, efficiency, and mechanism of non-AUG start codon usage in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, and provide examples of regulatory and functional sORFs that initiate at non-AUG codons. While only a handful of non-AUG-initiated novel genes have been characterized in detail to date, their participation in important biological processes suggests that an improved understanding of this class of genes is needed.

Control of Translation at the Initiation Phase During Glucose Starvation in Yeast

Glucose is one of the most important sources of carbon across all life. Glucose starvation is a key stress relevant to all eukaryotic cells. Glucose starvation responses have important implications in diseases, such as diabetes and cancer. In yeast, glucose starvation causes rapid and dramatic effects on the synthesis of proteins (mRNA translation). Response to glucose deficiency targets the initiation phase of translation by different mechanisms and with diverse dynamics. Concomitantly, translationally repressed mRNAs and components of the protein synthesis machinery may enter a variety of cytoplasmic foci, which also form with variable kinetics and may store or degrade mRNA. Much progress has been made in understanding these processes in the last decade, including with the use of high-throughput/omics methods of RNA and RNA:protein detection. This review dissects the current knowledge of yeast reactions to glucose starvation systematized by the stage of translation initiation, with the focus on rapid responses. We provide parallels to mechanisms found in higher eukaryotes, such as metazoans, for the most critical responses, and point out major remaining gaps in knowledge and possible future directions of research on translational responses to glucose starvation.