Diversity within the CLC chloride channel family involved in inherited diseases: from plasma membranes to acidic organelles

Post renal-transplant malignancy surveillance

It is well recognised that kidney transplant recipients have an increased risk of cancers compared with the age and gender matched general population. Malignancy is one of the commonest causes of death among this cohort after cardiovascular disease. This increased risk is largely attributable to the effect of immunosuppression, which impairs T cell function, immunosurveillance and the immunological control of oncogenic viral infections. Cancer related mortality rates are also higher in solid organ transplant recipients compared with the general population. While early diagnosis may improve outcomes in these patients, cancer screening is debatable given the lack of randomised controlled trials in this cohort, and treatment is often challenging. This article reviews the epidemiology and risk factors for the development of malignancy in the post-transplant setting, as well as screening guidelines for specific malignancies of which patients are at particular risk.

Vascular access and infection prevention and control: a national survey of routine practices in Irish haemodialysis units

BACKGROUND

National and international guidelines recommend the use of effective vascular access (VA) and infection prevention and control practices within the haemodialysis environment. Establishing an arterio-venous fistula (AVF) and preventing central venous catheter (CVC)-related infections are ongoing challenges for all dialysis settings. We surveyed VA and routine infection prevention and control practices in dialysis units, to provide national data on these practices in Ireland.

METHODS

A descriptive survey was emailed to nurse managers at all adult (n = 19) and children (n = 1) outpatient haemodialysis units in the Republic of Ireland. Data collected included AVF formation, CVC insertion and maintenance practices, VA use and surveillance of infection and screening protocols. Nineteen of the 20 units responded to the survey.

RESULTS

The AVF prevalence was 49% for 1370 patients in 17 units who provided these data [mean prevalence per unit: 45.7% (SD 16.2)]; the CVC mean prevalence per unit was 52.5% (SD 16.0). Fourteen dialysis units experienced inadequate access to vascular surgical procedures either due to a lack of dedicated theatre time or hospital beds. Six units administered intravenous prophylactic antimicrobials prior to CVC insertion with only two units using a CVC insertion checklist at the time of catheter insertion.

CONCLUSION

In general, dialysis units in Ireland show a strong adherence to national guidelines. Compared with the 12 countries participating in the Dialysis Outcomes Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS 4), in 2010, AVF prevalence in Irish dialysis units is the second lowest. Recommendations include establishing an AVF national prevalence target rate, discontinuing the administration of intravenous prophylactic antimicrobials prior to CVC insertion and promoting the use of CVC insertion checklists.

Endorsement of the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines on kidney transplantation: a European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) position statement

KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) is an international independent body aiming to 'improve the care and outcomes of kidney disease patients worldwide, through the development and implementation of clinical practice guidelines'. Recently, the KDIGO work group has produced comprehensive clinical practice guidelines for the care of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). The guideline makes recommendations for immunosuppression, graft monitoring, as well as prevention and treatment of infection, cardiovascular disease, malignancy and other complications that are common in KTRs, including haematological and bone disorders. Because most guidelines were 'soft' rather than 'strong', and because global guidelines need to be adapted and implemented into the regional context where they are used, the European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) Advisory Board appointed a work group of transplant nephrologists and surgeons to review the newest KDIGO guideline and comment on its relevance and applicability for European KTRs. In this article, we concentrate only on those guidelines which we considered worth amending or adapting. All guidelines not mentioned are fully endorsed.

Risk factors for Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PcP) in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PcP) is a potentially life-threatening complication in renal transplant recipients with increased reports during the past few years. Individual risk factors for susceptibility to PcP are incompletely understood.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 60 cases of confirmed PcP, diagnosed in six German transplant centres between 2004 and 2008, as well as 60 matched controls.

RESULTS

Compared with controls, PcP cases revealed the following significant differences: PcP cases had a poorer renal function (eGFR 31 vs. 42 mL/min in controls), more biopsy-proven rejections (18 vs. 5 patients), more frequent treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (53 vs. 44 patients) and less frequent treatment with interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (20 vs. 32 patients). According to centre policy, in those years, none of the patients or controls had received PcP prophylaxis after transplantation. Of the 60 patients with PcP, 30% developed the disease after the currently recommended duration of prophylactic treatment, 27% died in the course of the disease and 45% required treatment in the ICU.

CONCLUSIONS

Our case-control study reveals a novel risk profile for PcP. Renal transplant recipients with more pronounced renal insufficiency following rejection episodes and treated with intensified immunosuppression are at particular risk for PcP.

Use of personalized medicine in the selection of patients for renal transplantation: views of Quebec transplant physicians and referring nephrologists

AIM

To explore the views of physicians on the use of personalized medicine tools to develop a new method for selecting potential recipients of a renal allograft.

METHODS

A total of 22 semidirected interviews, using clinical case studies.

RESULTS

According to the participants, this method has several possible applications within renal transplantation (individualizing immunosuppressive therapy, help with decision making, and possibly with the selection of patients). It could be more effective than the method presently used. The method must be validated scientifically, and must also involve clinical judgment.

CONCLUSION

The use of personalized medicine within transplantation must be in the best interests of the patient. An ethical reflection is necessary in order to focus on the possibility of patients being excluded, as well as on the resolution of the equity/efficacy dilemma. Empirical research has shown itself to be essential for ascertaining the views of the clinicians who will be working with the tools provided by personalized medicine.

Pharmacogenomics of diuretic drugs: data on rare monogenic disorders and on polymorphisms and requirements for further research

This review summarizes the current status of our knowledge about the role of pharmacogenetic variation in response to diuretics and suggests future research topics for the field. Genes with a role in the pharmacokinetics of most diuretics are renal drug transporters, especially OAT1, OAT3 and OCT2 (genes SLC22A6, SLC22A8 and SLC22A2) whereas variants in carbonic anhydrase (CA), cytochrome P450 enzymes and sulfotransferases are relevant only for specific substances. Genes on the pharmacodynamic side include the primary targets of thiazide, loop, K+-sparing and aldosterone antagonistic diuretics: NCC, NKCC2, ENaC and the mineralocorticoid receptor (genes SLC12A3, SLC12A1, SCNN1A, B, G and NR3C2). Rare variants of these proteins cause Gitelman’s syndrome, Bartter’s syndrome, Liddle’s syndrome or pregnancy-induced hypertension. Polymorphisms in these and in associated proteins such as GNB3, α-adducin and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) seem to be clinically relevant. In conclusion, first knowledge has evolved that efficacy of diuretic drugs may be determined by genetic polymorphisms in genes determining pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of this drug class. In the future, the selection of a diuretic drug or the dosing schedules may be individually chosen based on pharmacogenetic parameters, however, many questions remain to be answered before this fantasy becomes reality.