The effect of nifedipine on renal function in normotensive cyclosporin-A-treated renal allograft recipients

The use of ciclosporin in psoriasis

Ciclosporin is a cyclic undecapeptide discovered in the 1970s to possess a potent inhibitory action on T lymphocytes. The subsequent discovery, in 1979, that it was remarkably effective in treatment of psoriasis transformed thinking about the nature of the disease, which subsequently became generally recognized as autoimmune in nature. Ciclosporin remains one of the most effective and rapidly acting treatments currently available for psoriasis. Virtually all the diverse manifestations of this disease can respond. The main side effects are nephrotoxicity and hypertension. There is considerable variation between individuals in susceptibility to these so careful monitoring is required. Ciclosporin should be used in single or intermittent short courses for all except the most severe cases as this is safer than continuous treatment. The rate of improvement depends very much on the dose, which ranges from 2 to 5.0 mg/kg/day. Ciclosporin can be combined with any topical treatment and a useful dose-sparing effect can be achieved in this way if patients are compliant. In severe cases ciclosporin is often used in combination with other systemic antipsoriatic drugs in order to spare the dose of each agent and reduce toxicity. Concurrent or intercurrent use of ultraviolet therapy is discouraged due to the increased risk of non-melanoma skin cancer. This article reviews the mode of action, pharmacokinetics, indications, contraindications, side effects, dosage regimens, pretreatment screening and monitoring, drug interactions, and use of treatment combinations with ciclosporin in the management of psoriasis.

Calcium channel blockers for preventing acute tubular necrosis in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The incidence of delayed graft function in cadaveric grafts has increased over the last few years due in part to the large demand for cadaveric kidneys necessitating the use of kidneys from marginal donors. Calcium channel blockers have the potential to reduce the incidence of post-transplant acute tubular necrosis (ATN) if given in the peri-operative period. However, there is controversy surrounding their use in this situation with no consensus as to their efficacy.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of using calcium channel blockers in the peri-transplant period in patients at risk of ATN following cadaveric kidney transplantation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, in The Cochrane Library) MEDLINE (from 1966) and EMBASE (from 1980). The Trials Search Coordinator was contacted to develop the search strategy. Date of last search: January 2007

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing calcium channel blockers given in the peri-transplant period with controls were included. Quasi-randomised trials were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data was extracted and quality assessed independently by two reviewers, with differences resolved by discussion. Dichotomous outcomes are reported as relative risk (RR) and measurements on continuous scales are reported as mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen trials (724 participants) were suitable for inclusion. Treatment with calcium channel blockers in the peri-transplant period was associated with a significant decrease in the incidence of post-transplant ATN (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.85) and delayed graft function (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.73). There was no difference between control and treatment groups in graft loss, mortality, requirement for haemodialysis. There was insufficient information to comment on adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that calcium channel blockers given in the peri-operative period may reduce the incidence of ATN post-transplantation. The result should be treated with caution due to the heterogeneity of the trials which made comparison of studies and pooling of data difficult.

Calcium channel blockers for preventing acute tubular necrosis in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The incidence of delayed graft function in cadaveric grafts has increased over the last few years due in part to the large demand for cadaveric kidneys necessitating the use of kidneys from marginal donors. Calcium channel blockers have the potential to reduce the incidence of post-transplant acute tubular necrosis (ATN) if given in the peri-operative period. However, there is controversy surrounding their use in this situation with no consensus as to their efficacy.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of using calcium channel blockers in the peri-transplant period in patients at risk of ATN following cadaveric kidney transplantation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, in The Cochrane Library) MEDLINE (from 1966) and EMBASE (from 1980). The Trials Search Coordinator was contacted to develop the search strategy. Date of last database and register search: January 2005

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing calcium channel blockers given in the peri-transplant period with controls were included. Quasi-randomised trials were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data was extracted and quality assessed independently by two reviewers, with differences resolved by discussion. Dichotomous outcomes are reported as relative risk (RR) and measurements on continuous scales are reported as weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Ten trials were suitable for inclusion. Treatment with calcium channel blockers in the peri-transplant period was associated with a significant decrease in the incidence of post transplant ATN (RR 0.57, 95%CI 0.40 to 0.82) and delayed graft function (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.72). There was no difference between control and treatment groups in graft loss, mortality, requirement for haemodialysis. There was insufficient information to comment on adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that calcium channel blockers given in the peri-operative period may reduce the incidence of ATN post-transplantation. The result should be treated with caution due to the heterogeneity of the trials which made comparison of studies and pooling of data difficult.

Nifedipine improves immediate, and 6- and 12-month graft function in cyclosporin A (CyA) treated renal allograft recipients

To investigate the effect of oral nifedipine, a calcium channel blocker known not to modify cyclosporin A (CyA) pharmacokinetics, on immediate transplant function and CyA nephrotoxicity, 68 adult renal transplant recipients were pre-operatively randomized to one of three regimes: A (high-dose CyA, initial dose 17 mg/kg per day, maintenance dose 7 mg/kg per day); B (regime A plus oral nifedipine); C low-dose CyA, initial dose 10 mg/kg per day, maintenance 4 mg/kg per day plus azathioprine 1 mg/kg per day). All three groups received identical steroid regimes. Calcium channel blockers of all types were avoided in groups A and C. Delayed graft function (dialysis dependence by day 4) was seen least frequently in group B (P < 0.02). Group B had improved graft function at 6 months compared with group A, identified by differences in serum creatinine (P < 0.05), GFR (P < 0.01) and ERPF (P < 0.05). Similar differences in serum creatinine (P < 0.05) and GFR (P < 0.05) were also identified at 12 months. Group C also had better 6- and 12-month GFR values than group A (P < 0.05 each). The three groups did not differ in donor or recipient age, HLA matching, ischaemic or anastomosis times, frequency of early rejection or whole-blood CyA levels. These results indicate that nifedipine significantly improves immediate and medium-term graft function.

New pharmacologic options for renal preservation

The understanding of the cause and pathophysiology of renal failure has guided the rational development of pharmacologic renoprotective strategies. Although traditionally anesthesiologists have focused on renal hemodynamic derangements, newer information suggests that cellular interactions amplify and perpetuate the insult. Consequently, the potential renoprotective armamentarium not only encompasses the more traditional vasoactive agents but also therapeutic approaches that may modify the cellular response to injury. Although few of these agents have reached the clinical arena, preliminary work suggests that this new approach to renal injury and protection may be promising.

Primary care of patients with renal transplants

The number of renal transplant recipients in the community continues to rise due to improved organ and patient survival. With increasing emphasis on primary care, more organ transplant recipients are being cared for by primary care physicians. This article outlines the management of renal transplant recipients and reviews the problems unique to this group of patients.

The beneficial effects of oral nifedipine on cyclosporin-treated renal transplant recipients--a randomised prospective study

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that nifedipine will improve graft survival in cyclosporin A (CyA)-treated renal transplant recipients. One hundred and forty-seven patients were randomised to one of three regimens. Group A received CyA, 7 mg/kg per day, and prednisolone; group B followed the same regimen as group A plus oral nifedipine and group C received CyA, 4 mg/kg per day, prednisolone and azathioprine. Calcium channel blockers were avoided in groups A and C. The crude 2-year (P = 0.0223) and 4-year (P = 0.0181) graft survival was significantly better in group B (86% and 81%, respectively) than in group A (75% and 63%, respectively). Delayed initial function was seen least frequently in group B (10.2%) compared to groups A (31%) and C (28%; P < 0.01). Group B also experienced fewer rejection episodes than groups A and C (P < 0.05). We conclude that the combination of oral nifedipine and CyA significantly improves initial graft function, rejection frequency and long term graft survival.

Effects of a selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonist on the development of cyclosporin nephrotoxicity

1. The clinical application of cyclosporin as an immunosuppressive agent is limited by its nephrotoxicity. 2. The effect of FK453, a selective A1-receptor antagonist, administered twice daily to rats at a dose of 100 mg kg-1 was assessed on the development of nephrotoxicity induced by cyclosporin (10 mg kg-1 i.p. daily) administered for 14 days. The effects of nifedipine administered twice daily (0.3 mg kg-1 s.c.) for 14 days, on cyclosporin nephrotoxicity were also studied. 3. Cyclosporin induced a 46.58% and 35.78% decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) respectively and a reduction of 16.69% in filtration fraction (FF). Co-administration of FK453 resulted in falls of 30.5%, 18.59% and 14.7% in GFR, ERPF and FF respectively, the former two significantly less than the falls seen with cyclosporin (CyA) alone (P < 0.05 vs CyA, ANOVA). 4. Nifedipine appeared to have a more pronounced protective effect resulting in a decline of only 20.91% in GFR, with no significant change in ERPF (increase of 0.93%) when co-administered with CyA. 5. These observations indicate adenosine plays a minor role in the pathophysiology of CyA nephrotoxicity.

A possible role for nitric oxide in modulating the functional cyclosporine toxicity by arginine

The renal damage consequent to cyclosporine A (CsA) administration ranges from hemodynamic alterations to irreversible chronic lesions. The initial vasoconstriction depends upon the imbalance between the various modulators of the renal vascular tone, among which the most powerful are endothelins and nitric oxide (NO). CsA could play a crucial role by inhibiting the Ca++/calmodulin-mediated activation of the constitutive NO synthase (NOS) isoform, which converts L-arginine (L-Arg) into NO and citrulline, with a 1:1 stoichiometry. To investigate the possibility of modulating CsA nephrotoxicity with L-Arg we studied six groups (G) of Lewis rats treated with daily gavage up to eight weeks: G1, CsA 40 mg/kg; G2, G1 plus L-Arg 300 mg/kg; G3, G2 plus the competitive inhibitor of NOS, NG-nitro-L-Arg (L-NNA); G4, L-Arg alone; G5, L-NNA alone; and G6, controls receiving vehicle alone. After eight weeks L-Arg treated rats were protected against the toxic effects of CsA [creatinine (Cr) values, G2, 0.62 +/- 0.05 mg/dl vs. G1, 0.99 +/- 0.16 mg/dl, P < 0.001; proteinuria (P), G2, 7.2 +/- 1.02 mg/day vs. G1, 15.1 +/- 1.9 mg/day, P < 0.01]. The administration of L-NNA abolished the protective effect of L-Arg (G3, Cr 1.23 +/- 0.16 mg/dl; P 16.9 = 2.3; P < 0.02 and P < 0.005, respectively vs. G2). The levels of Cr in G2 rats were superimposable to control groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hypertension after renal transplantation. Calcium channel or converting enzyme blockade?

We compared the effects of 4 weeks of calcium channel blockade (amlodipine) or converting enzyme inhibition (lisinopril) on blood pressure and renal hemodynamics in a double-blind crossover trial in a group of 20 hypertensive cyclosporine-treated renal transplant patients. Amlodipine (10 mg) was more effective than the same dose of lisinopril in controlling hypertension (mean 24-hour arterial pressure, 111 +/- 9 and 115 +/- 9 mm Hg, respectively; P < .05). Blood pressure during both treatments was lower than during placebo (124 +/- 12 mm Hg, P < .05). Compared with placebo, amlodipine treatment was associated with a significant increase in glomerular filtration rate (10 +/- 20%, P < .05) and effective renal plasma flow (27 +/- 20%, P < .01) and a decrease in renal vascular resistance (23 +/- 18%, P < .01). Renal hemodynamics did not change during lisinopril. Neither drug had an effect on proteinuria. The data indicate that amlodipine is more effective than lisinopril in controlling hypertension in cyclosporine-treated patients and that treatment with amlodipine but not with lisinopril is accompanied by an increase in glomerular filtration rate and effective renal plasma flow and a decrease in renal vascular resistance. The data suggest that the renin-angiotensin system does not play a main role in determining cyclosporine-associated changes in renal hemodynamics and has a limited role in determining cyclosporine-associated hypertension.

Acute effects of nifedipine in renal transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine or azathioprine

Cyclosporine (CsA) impairs renal function, probably by preglomerular vasoconstriction. Vasodilating substances may therefore be of benefit to ameliorate CsA-induced renal dysfunction. We studied the acute effects on blood pressure and renal function of the dihydropyridine calcium antagonist nifedipine (10 mg orally) in 20 CsA-treated renal transplant patients. In addition, we compared the effects of nifedipine when given immediately before and 4 weeks after elective conversion from CsA to azathioprine. Compared with placebo (n = 14), administration of nifedipine led to a significant decrease in blood pressure and a strong natriuretic and diuretic response. Despite the reduction in blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate improved from 60 +/- 20 (mean +/- SD) to 69 +/- 24 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P < 0.001) and renal plasma flow (RPF) increased from 260 +/- 87 to 338 +/- 120 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P < 0.001). The combination of a decreased blood pressure with an increased RPF was reflected in a sharp decrease in renal vascular resistance (0.34 +/- 0.18 units v 0.23 +/- 0.10 units; P < 0.001). The conversion from CsA to azathioprine by itself led to significant increases in glomerular filtration rate (62 +/- 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 v 76 +/- 18 mL/min/1.73 m2; P < 0.05) and RPF (280 +/- 86 mL/min/1.73 m2 v 334 +/- 66 mL/min/1.73 m2; P < 0.05). During treatment with azathioprine an effect of nifedipine on glomerular filtration rate and RPF was no longer observed, although the natriuretic effect was similar on both occasions. The decrease in renal vascular resistance was larger during treatment with CsA than during treatment with azathioprine (P < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Influence of nifedipine on interstitial fibrosis in renal transplant allografts treated with cyclosporin A

AIMS

To compare the degree of interstitial fibrosis in renal transplant biopsy specimens from immunosuppressed patients using conventional doses of cyclosporin with and without calcium channel blockade with a combination of low dose cyclosporin and azathioprine; to correlate the degree of interstitial fibrosis with the glomerular filtration rate.

METHODS

A single blind histomorphometric assessment was done of cortical interstitial volume fraction from biopsy specimens taken intraoperatively and at one, six, and 12 months after transplantation from three prospectively randomised groups of patients: (A) conventional dose cyclosporin; (B) conventional dose cyclosporin plus nifedipine; (C) low dose cyclosporin plus azathioprine.

RESULTS

Interstitial volume increased with time in all groups. No differences in interstitial volume were present at operation or at one month, but at six months interstitial volume was significantly less in group B than group A (p < 0.001) or group C (p < 0.05). More grafts failed in group A than group B leaving only small numbers for comparison at 12 months. At 12 months the differences persisted but did not reach significance. These results strongly reflected the clinical findings, where glomerular filtration rate was significantly lower in group A than groups B or C at six and 12 months; no differences in glomerular filtration rate were found at one month. In a direct comparison glomerular filtration rate showed a significant negative correlation with interstitial volume fraction.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that calcium channel blockade with nifedipine slows the development of interstitial fibrosis in renal transplant recipients treated with cyclosporin. When clinical data are considered, it is suggested that calcium channel blockade may have a mitigating effect on the long term nephrotoxic effects of cyclosporin and should be considered as adjunctive treatment in patients requiring this immunosuppressant following renal transplantation.

Increased renal and forearm vasoconstriction in response to exercise after heart transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that the loss of the inhibitory effect of the cardiac ventricular afferent fibres on the vasomotor centre would result in increased vasoconstrictor drive to the forearm and renal vascular beds during supine exercise in heart transplant recipients.

DESIGN

Comparison of regional haemodynamic response to exercise in heart transplant recipients and two age matched control groups.

SETTING

Regional heart transplant unit.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Orthotopic heart transplant recipients (n = 10), patients with NYHA class II heart failure (n = 10), and normal controls (n = 10) underwent short duration maximal supine bicycle exercise.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Simultaneous measurements were made of heart rate, systemic blood pressure, oxygen consumption (VO2), forearm blood flow, and renal blood flow. Forearm blood flow was measured by forearm plethysmography and renal blood flow by continuous renal vein thermodilution.

RESULTS

The peak forearm vascular resistance was significantly greater in the transplant group than in the controls (mean (SEM) 75 (18) v 40 (7) resistance units, p < 0.05). The percentage fall in renal blood flow at peak exercise was significantly greater in heart transplant recipients than in the controls (44% (4%) v 32% (4%), p < 0.05) as was the percentage increase in renal vascular resistance (transplants: 116% (19%) v controls: 78% (17%), p < 0.05). Regional haemodynamics during exercise in the heart failure group were not significantly different from those in the controls.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that surgical division of the cardiac ventricular afferent fibres results in increased vasoconstrictor drive to the kidneys and non-exercising muscle during exercise. This mechanism may contribute to persistent exercise limitation and renal impairment after heart transplantation.

Converting-enzyme inhibitor versus calcium antagonist in cyclosporine-treated renal transplants

The influence of antihypertensive treatment on the long-term evolution of arterial pressure and renal function was studied in a prospective controlled trial conducted in renal transplant recipients treated by cyclosporine. Within six months after transplantation, patients were randomly allocated to treatment by the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril (ACEI, alone or associated with frusemide; N = 14), or the calcium antagonist, nifedipine (CA, alone or associated with atenolol; N = 11). Glomerular filtration rate (TcDTPA clearance) and effective renal plasma flow (hippuran clearance) as well as 24-hour urinary excretion of electrolytes and albumin were estimated at about 1 and 2.5 years of follow-up. Before initiation of antihypertensive therapy, the two groups were similar with regards to mean arterial pressure (119 +/- 2 vs. 120 +/- 4 mm Hg), effective renal plasma flow (285 +/- 26 vs. 248 +/- 33 ml/min/1.73 m2) and glomerular filtration rate (59 +/- 4 vs. 61 +/- 8 ml/min/1.73 m2 in the ACEI and CA groups, respectively). Both ACEI and CA treatments were associated with no change in renal function, a similar change in mean arterial pressure (ACEI -18 +/- 3; CA -13 +/- 5 mm Hg) and identical trough blood levels of cyclosporine. Urinary albumin excretion did not change significantly in any groups. Of interest, only in the ACEI group did filtration fraction significantly decrease (from 0.22 +/- 0.01% to 0.19 +/- 0.01% at final studies). These results indicate that in cyclosporine-treated transplant recipients, a satisfactory control of hypertension is obtained by chronic ACEI, which is as effective on arterial pressure as a combination of CA and atenolol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The use of lithium clearance studies in the early detection of cyclosporin A (CsA) nephrotoxicity: a protocol of renal function assessment with CsA therapy

Cyclosporin A nephrotoxicity was studied with the use of lithium and creatinine clearance tests in 18 patients with chronic intraocular inflammation (duration of treatment 3-48 months). In 11 patients lithium clearance and fractional excretion of lithium were significantly reduced (compared with pretreatment levels) within the first six months of treatment. There was no significant change in either serum creatinine or creatinine clearance within this period. In 14/18 patients there was a significant reduction in lithium clearance and fractional excretion of lithium during the treatment period. 7 patients whose therapy was stopped because of continuing nephrotoxicity despite dose reduction, demonstrated some reversibility of renal function on cessation of cyclosporin A. We propose a protocol for the assessment of renal function in these patients so that with dose modulation the changes in these parameters can be minimised, reducing the risk of renal impairment, whilst maximising immunosuppressive treatment.