Use and misuse of the renal functional reserve concept in clinical nephrology

Renal Functional Response-Association With Birth Weight and Kidney Volume

Introduction

Renal functional response (RFR) is the acute increase in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) after a protein load. Low RFR is a marker of single nephron hyperfiltration. Low birth weight (LBW) is associated with reduced number of nephrons, lower kidney function, and smaller kidneys in adults. In the present study, we investigate the associations among LBW, kidney volume, and RFR.

Methods

We studied adults aged 41 to 52 years born with either LBW (≤2300 g) or normal birth weight (NBW; 3500-4000 g). GFR was measured using plasma clearance of iohexol. A stimulated GFR (sGFR) was measured on a separate day after a protein load of 100 g using a commercially available protein powder, and RFR was calculated as delta GFR. Kidney volume was estimated from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images using the ellipsoid formula.

Results

A total of 57 women and 48 men participated. The baseline mean ± SD GFR was 118 ± 17 ml/min for men and 98 ± 19 ml/min for women. The overall mean RFR was 8.2 ± 7.4 ml/min, with mean RFR of 8.3 ± 8.0 ml/min and 8.1 ± 6.9 ml/min in men and women, respectively (P = 0.5). No birth-related variables were associated with RFR. Larger kidney volume was associated with higher RFR, 1.9 ml/min per SD higher kidney volume (P = 0.009). Higher GFR per kidney volume was associated with a lower RFR, -3.3ml/min per SD (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Larger kidney size and lower GFR per kidney volume were associated with higher RFR. Birth weight was not shown to associate with RFR in mainly healthy middle-aged men and women.

Renal functional reserve: from physiological phenomenon to clinical biomarker and beyond

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is acutely increased following a high-protein meal or systemic infusion of amino acids. The mechanisms underlying this renal functional response remain to be fully elucidated. Nevertheless, they appear to culminate in preglomerular vasodilation. Inhibition of the tubuloglomerular feedback signal appears critical. However, nitric oxide, vasodilator prostaglandins, and glucagon also appear important. The increase in GFR during amino acid infusion reveals a "renal reserve," which can be utilized when the physiological demand for single nephron GFR increases. This has led to the concept that in subclinical renal disease, before basal GFR begins to reduce, renal functional reserve can be recruited in a manner that preserves renal function. The extension of this concept is that once a decline in basal GFR can be detected, renal disease is already well progressed. This concept likely applies both in the contexts of chronic kidney disease and acute kidney injury. Critically, its corollary is that deficits in renal functional reserve have the potential to provide early detection of renal dysfunction before basal GFR is reduced. There is growing evidence that the renal response to infusion of amino acids can be used to identify patients at risk of developing either chronic kidney disease or acute kidney injury and as a treatment target for acute kidney injury. However, large multicenter clinical trials are required to test these propositions. A renewed effort to understand the renal physiology underlying the response to amino acid infusion is also warranted.

Impact of intentional accessory renal artery coverage on renal outcomes after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of intentional coverage of accessory renal arteries (ARAs) on renal outcomes after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) for pararenal aortic aneurysms or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

METHODS

We analyzed the clinical data of 296 patients enrolled in a prospective nonrandomized study to evaluate outcomes of FB-EVAR between 2013 and 2018. Patients with solitary kidneys, intraoperative loss of main renal arteries, or pre-existing stage V chronic kidney disease were excluded. Two groups were analyzed: patients with intentional ARA coverage; and controls, who had complete preservation. End points included 30-day mortality; major adverse events; acute kidney injury (AKI), defined by RIFLE criteria (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function, and End-stage renal disease); renal function deterioration (RFD), defined by >30% decline in baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate; and presence of renal infarcts.

RESULTS

There were 254 patients (184 male; mean age, 75 ± 8 years) included in the study, 56 (22%) with intentional ARA coverage and 198 controls, of whom 16 had ARA preservation. ARA diameter was smaller in patients who had intentional coverage vs preservation (2.7 ± 0.9 mm vs 3.4 ± 0.2 mm; P < .001). There was no difference in demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, and aneurysm extent. All ARAs intended to be incorporated were successfully stented. Patients with ARA coverage had a higher frequency of kidney infarction (75% vs 25%; P < .001). There were two (1%) deaths within 30 days, both among controls. Patients with ARA coverage had more major adverse events (32% vs 19%; P = .04) because of higher incidence of AKI (21% vs 9%; P = .02). None of the 16 patients who had ARA preservation developed AKI. At 3 years, freedom from RFD was lower for patients who had ARA coverage compared with controls (55% ± 9% vs 76% ± 5%; log-rank, P = .02). By multivariate analysis, predictors of AKI were ARA coverage (odds ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-6.2; P = .01) and estimated blood loss >1 L (odds ratio, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.2-12.3; P = .03). Postoperative AKI (hazard ratio [HR], 4.4; 95% CI, 2.4-8.1; P < .001), renal reintervention for stenosis (HR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.6-6.7; P = .002), aneurysm diameter (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06; P < .001), and ARA coverage (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 2.4-8.1; P = .02) were predictors of RFD.

CONCLUSIONS

Intentional ARA coverage during FB-EVAR was associated with a threefold increase in AKI and with lower freedom from RFD. Factors associated with RFD included postoperative AKI, renal reinterventions for stenosis, and ARA coverage. Incorporation of ARAs during FB-EVAR, when it is technically feasible, helps decrease risk of AKI and RFD.

Outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair in patients with a solitary functional kidney

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR) of pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) in patients with a solitary functional kidney (SFK).

METHODS

We analyzed the outcomes of 287 consecutive patients (206 male; mean age, 74 ± 8 years old) enrolled in a prospective nonrandomized study to investigate use of F-BEVAR for treatment of patients with pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms or TAAAs between 2013 and 2018. Outcomes were analyzed in patients with solitary kidney (functional or congenital) and compared with control patients who had two functioning kidneys. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined using Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function, and End-stage renal disease criteria, and renal function deterioration (RFD) was defined by a decline in estimated glomerular filtration the estimated glomerular filtration rate of more than 30% from baseline. End points included 30-day mortality and major adverse events, AKI, freedom from RFD, and patient survival.

RESULTS

There where 30 patients (10%) with a SFK and 257 patients with two functioning kidneys. Patients with a SFK were younger and had significantly (P < .05) higher baseline creatinine (+0.3 mg/dL), lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (-16 mL/minute/1.73 m²) and more often had stage III to V chronic kidney disease (73% vs 43%). There were no differences in cardiovascular risk factors and aneurysm extent. Technical success was achieved in 98.9% of patients with SFK and in 99.8% of controls (P = .10). At 30 days, there was no significant differences in mortality (0% vs 1%) and major adverse events (40% vs 24%; P = .08), including rates of AKI (20% vs 12%) and new-onset dialysis (3% vs 1%) between patients with a SFK and the control group, respectively. Mean follow-up was 18 ± 15 months. At 2 years, there was no difference (P = .36) in patient survival (92 ± 5% vs 84 ± 3%) and freedom from RFD (100 ± 0% vs 84 ± 3%) for patients with SFK and controls, respectively. Presence of a SFK was not a predictor for AKI or RFD. By multivariable analysis, estimated blood loss of more than 1 L (odds ratio [OR], 2.9; P = .04) and total fluoroscopy time (OR, 1.8; P = .05) were predictors for AKI, and postoperative AKI (OR, 4.9; P < .001), renal branch occlusion/stenosis (OR, 3.1; P = .001), and Crawford extent II TAAA (OR, 2.4; P = .007) were predictors for RFD.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the worse baseline renal function, F-BEVAR is safe and effective with nearly identical outcomes in patients with a SFK as compared with patients with two functioning kidneys. Development of postoperative AKI is the most important predictor for RFD.

Haemodynamic or metabolic stimulation tests to reveal the renal functional response: requiem or revival?

Renal stimulation tests document the dynamic response of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) after a single or a combination of stimuli, such as an intravenous infusion of dopamine or amino acids or an oral protein meal. The increment of the GFR above the unstimulated state has formerly been called the renal functional reserve (RFR). Although the concept of a renal reserve capacity has not withstood scientific scrutiny, the literature documenting renal stimulation merits renewed interest. An absent or a blunted response of the GFR after a stimulus indicates lost or diseased nephrons. This information is valuable in preventing, diagnosing and prognosticating acute kidney injury and pregnancy-related renal events as well as chronic kidney disease. However, before renal function testing is universally practiced, some shortcomings must be addressed. First, a common nomenclature should be decided upon. The expression of RFR should be replaced by renal functional response. Second, a simple protocol must be developed and propagated. Third, we suggest designing prospective studies linking a defective stimulatory response to emergence of renal injury biomarkers, to histological or morphological renal abnormalities and to adverse renal outcomes in different renal syndromes.

Renal Functional Reserve Revisited

Kidney function, like the function of other organs, is dynamic and continuously adjusts to changes in the internal environment to maintain homeostasis. The glomerular filtration rate, which serves as the primary index of kidney function in clinical practice, increases in response to various physiological and pathological stressors including oral protein intake. The difference between the glomerular filtration rate in the resting state and at maximum capacity has been termed renal functional reserve (RFR). RFR could provide additional information on kidney health and renal function prognosis. Despite longstanding interest in RFR as a biomarker in nephrology, its underlying mechanisms remain inadequately understood. Moreover, no consensus has been reached on how it should be quantified. Previous studies on RFR have used various measurement methods and yielded heterogeneous results. A standardized and clinically feasible approach to quantifying RFR would allow for more rigorous appraisal of its value as a biomarker and could pave the way for adoption of "renal stress tests" into clinical practice.

Glomerular function reserve and sodium sensitivity

In clinical nephrology, the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) has been recognized as the golden standard to assess renal function. However, a normal GFR does not necessarily mean normal filtration capability of the kidneys, because impaired filtration capability can be compensated for by elevating glomerular hydraulic pressure. Therefore, an early phase of glomerular dysfunction cannot be detected by the baseline GFR alone. On the other hand, glomerular capillary hypertension is widely recognized as one of the strong risk factors for the progression of nephropathies. Now, it is very important to imagine glomerular hemodynamics in each patient with nephropathy for detecting early dysfunction, as well as for evaluating risk factors. Here, I would like to summarize the current status of how an early phase of renal dysfunction can be detected in clinical practice. I truly anticipate that new methods to assess glomerular hemodynamics in humans will be developed in the near future.

Renal response to a protein load persists during long-term follow-up of children after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Kidney donors and transplant recipients may be at risk of complications from glomerular hyperfiltration of the single kidney. It has been assumed that tests of the existence of renal functional reserve [delta glomerular filtration rate (deltaGFR), delta effective renal plasma flow (deltaERPF)] can be used to demonstrate hyperfiltration. It would therefore be of interest to evaluate the response of the kidney graft to a protein load. i.e., testing the renal reserve and to find out whether a reduction in baseline GFR is preceded by a loss of deltaGFR.

METHODS

We repeatedly studied the change in GFR and renal plasma flow (ERPF) after an oral protein load in 30 children after renal transplantation (Tx). Follow-up time was 1.0-8.0 years. Renal function was evaluated with the clearances of inulin and para-aminohippuric acid (PAH). Seven recipient/donor pairs were examined twice (median 0.3 and 4 years, after Tx).

RESULTS

The baseline GFR and ERPF remained stable throughout the follow-up and the increase after stimulation (deltaGFR and deltaERPF) did not change in the whole group of Tx children over the years. However, a reduction in the baseline GFR from the first to the last investigation occurred in 23 of 30 children. In the 23 patients whose baseline GFR decreased, deltaGFR was still preserved. In the recipient/donor pairs, the baseline GFR and ERPF were the same, but on the second investigation, donors showed higher deltaGFR.

CONCLUSION

Despite fairly low baseline GFR and ERPF values in the Tx children, no change occurs in the capacity to increase GFR and ERPF after a protein load during follow-up, which suggests that they are not maximally hyperfiltrating.

Dynamic renal function testing by compartmental analysis: assessment of renal functional reserve in essential hypertension

BACKGROUND

In essential hypertension, acute haemodynamic changes due to dietary protein load cause patterns of acute changes in renal function that are fundamentally different from changes in normal controls.

METHODS

Renal clearances of sinistrin, an inulin-like polyfructosan, and p-aminohippurate were determined before and after protein ingestion. These tests were performed in healthy controls and in patients with essential hypertension (mean arterial pressure of 112+/-2 mmHg, age, 52+/-2 years; mean+/-SEM) within a washout period, and after long-term treatment with carvedilol and fosinopril, respectively.

RESULTS

In 15 healthy volunteers, protein ingestion increased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from 110.3+/-3.6 to 120. 6+/-4.4 ml/min (P=0.0006; two-tailed pairwise t-test). In contrast, it led to an acute decrease in GFR in 16 hypertensive patients, from 111.8+/-2.9 to 103.6+/-3.3 ml/min (P=0.0010). The eight patients who were randomized to receive carvedilol improved in their renal response to protein (GFR increased from 101.4+/-6.4 to 107.1+/-5.4 ml/min; P=0.04), whereas the eight other patients randomized to receive fosinopril exhibited no change in GFR (final value 105+/-4.9 ml/min). In the patients, the acute shifts in renal plasma flows were not significant. Mean arterial blood pressure of the patients decreased from 112+/-2 to 100+/-3 mmHg (P=0.0015).

CONCLUSIONS

In essential hypertension an acute protein load induces a decrease in GFR that may normalize under antihypertensive treatment. The acute changes in GFR can be reliably monitored by the here-described compartmental analysis method of renal functional reserve.

Effect of nifedipine and captopril on glomerular hyperfiltration in normotensive man

Glomerular hyperfiltration and hypertension induced by extensive loss of renal parenchyma are suspected to accelerate progression of renal failure. Amino acid infusion or protein ingestion also modify renal hemodynamics and increase glomerular filtration rate (GFR). This phenomenon was used to study the influence of two commonly used antihypertensive agents, captopril and nifedipine, on renal hemodynamics at rest and during glomerular hyperfiltration. Thirteen healthy volunteers were studied on three separate days (days A, B, and C) in random sequence: inulin and p-amino hippurate (PAH) clearance were measured first under glucose infusion and afterwards under stimulation by amino acid infusion (0.35 mmol/kg/min; 4 mg/kg/min). Day A served as a control, where no medication was given. On day B, 10 mg nifedipine, and on day C, 25 mg captopril, were administered orally before study. Without premedication (= day A, control) GFR increased from 108.0 +/- 6.9 mL/min (SEM) to 131.7 +/- 7.0 mL/min (P less than 0.05). On day B (nifedipine), GFR before stimulation by amino acids was already elevated to 121.8 +/- 4.2 mL/min (P less than 0.05 compared with day A) and increased to 132.6 +/- 6.3 mL/min with infusion of amino acids, thus to the same range as on day A without medication. On day C, after captopril, GFR did not increase with infusion of amino acids (from 112.5 +/- 7.2 to 117.3 +/- 6.3 mL/min). Our results indicate the calcium channel antagonist nifedipine and the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor captopril differ in their effect on intrarenal hemodynamic parameters. Nifedipine induces hyperfiltration at rest and allows maximal hyperfiltration to develop under amino acid infusion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Renal funtional reserve in kidney transplant recipients

In the last few years different authors have observed that kidney transplant recipients with good organ function do not have a renal functional reserve (RFR). This condition is accompained by a high glomerular filtration rate (GFR). We studied RFR in patients with very good organ function under different immunosuppressive therapies, who were divided into groups based on the presence or absence of RFR.

Long-term studies of cisplatin-induced reductions in porcine renal functional reserve

Mature Large White female pigs aged approx. 10 months received single intravenous doses of 1.5, 2, or 2.5 mg/kg cisplatin. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and the effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) in individual kidneys were measured prior to and at 4-week intervals for up to 24 weeks after cisplatin administration by renography using [99mTc]-diethylenetriamminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) and iodohippurate sodium I 131, respectively. The left kidney of each cisplatin-treated pig and that of three age-matched control pigs was then removed, and GFR and ERPF values were measured in the remaining kidney at 4-week intervals for a further 24 weeks after unilateral nephrectomy (UN). Pigs treated with cisplatin showed no significant reduction in GFR or ERPF for up to 24 weeks after drug infusion. As measured using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, the mean renal platinum concentration in the left kidney removed at UN was 77.5 +/- 9.1 ng/g kidney per mg/kg cisplatin. Histological evaluation of these kidneys revealed narrow interconnecting rays of interstitial fibrosis in the deep cortex and medulla; in these areas, glomeruli exhibited thickened Bowman's capsules and occasionally shrunken sclerotic capillaries. In cisplatin-treated pigs, UN was associated with a marked reduction in the ability of the remaining kidney to increase its function in terms of GFR and, to a lesser extent, of ERPF. The increase seen in GFR following UN in the cisplatin-treated pigs was only ca. 50%-70% of that seen in age-matched UN controls. Histologically, these kidneys revealed resolution of the peritubular fibrosis observed at UN; occasional sclerotic glomeruli were also evident. Platinum remained detectable in these kidneys, the mean levels being 18.8 +/- 4.9 ng/g kidney per mg/kg cisplatin. These findings confirm previous observations and illustrate the need for caution in considering further treatment of patients who have previously received cisplatin along with a second potentially nephrotoxic agent.

Renal functional reserve: its significance in normal and salt depletion conditions

The aim of this study was the evaluation, in healthy subjects, of the renal functional reserve (RFR), that is, the GFR increase induced by a combined infusion of amino acids (AA) and dopamine (D), in conditions of extracellular volume depletion caused by diuretic administration. In particular, this study was undertaken: a) to evaluate whether and to which extent, AA + D can reverse the functional GFR impairment induced by salt depletion, without volume restoration; b) to study whether any relationship may be found between the GFR in normal condition (the so-called "resting" GFR), and/or the renal functional reserve and the GFR impairment induced by salt depletion, in order to understand the role of both "resting" GFR and RFR in the degree of renal dysfunction induced by salt depletion. In control conditions the i.v. infusion of AA + D significantly increased RPF (+ 41% vs. baseline period) with a mean absolute increase of 211 ml/min. A similar pattern was observed in GFR behavior (+31.5% with 34 ml/min of mean absolute increase). A significant inverse exponential relationship was observed between GFR before AA + D i.v. infusion ("resting" GFR) and renal functional reserve (P less than 0.05), suggesting that, in normal conditions, these inversely related parameters may widely vary according to the tone of the glomerular arterioles. Following salt depletion, we observed a variable degree of GFR impairment. Both GFR and RPF were significantly decreased (-25.9%, P less than 0.05 and -29%, P less than 0.05, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)