Cancer survival in kidney transplant recipients in Ireland

Cancer mortality among solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the cancer mortality risk among solid organ transplant recipients through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed (starting from 1965), ISI Web of Science (starting from 1900), MEDLINE (starting from 1976), and Scopus (starting from 1968) from the inception of each database until July 15, 2024. Studies published in English reporting at least one type of cancer mortality risk among recipients of any type of solid organ transplantation were included. The main outcomes were the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) for cancer mortality in transplant recipients compared to the general population, and the hazard ratio (HR) for cancer mortality in transplant recipients versus cancer patients without prior transplantation.

RESULTS

Solid organ transplant recipients had a 2.06-fold increased cancer mortality risk (SMR, 2.06 [95 % CI, 1.56-2.71]) than the general population. Risks were higher in kidney (SMR 1.92 [95 % CI: 1.30-2.84]), liver (SMR 3.07 [95 % CI: 1.80-5.24]), and lung/heart (SMR 4.87 [95 % CI: 3.33-7.12]) transplant recipients. Cancer patients with prior transplantation had a 1.47-fold increased cancer mortality risk (HR 1.47 [95 % CI: 1.29-1.68]) than those without. East Asia female transplant recipients exhibited higher mortality risks from breast, ovarian, cervix and uterus cancers than those from other regions (SMR 3.13 [95 % CI: 1.93-5.07] vs. 1.16 [95 % CI: 0.88-1.53], P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Solid organ transplant recipients face significantly higher cancer mortality risks than the general population, highlighting the need for targeted cancer screening and interventions, especially for female solid organ transplant recipients from East Asia.

Prostate cancer and solid organ transplantation: patient management and outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the management and outcomes of individuals diagnosed with prostate cancer either before or after organ transplantation, as the impact of organ transplantation and associated immunosuppression on the incidence, progression, and mortality of prostate cancer remains an area of substantial clinical interest and uncertainty.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients from two tertiary care centres who had solid organ transplantation and were diagnosed with prostate cancer before or after organ transplantation. Data collected included demographics and clinical information.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 110 patients with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age at prostate cancer diagnosis of 62 (56.6-67.2) years and a median (IQR) age at transplantation of 58.6 (52.7-65.3) years. Renal transplantation was the most common (54%). The median (IQR) prostate-specific antigen concentration at prostate cancer diagnosis was 6.2 (4.5-10) ng/mL, and the distribution of American Urological Association risk groups was: low risk, 36%; intermediate risk, 50%; and high risk, 14%. In all, 45 (41%) patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer prior to transplantation. Management included radical prostatectomy (RP; 62%), prostate radiotherapy (RT; 13%), and active surveillance (AS; 18%). During a median (IQR) follow-up of 5.8 (2.5-10) years from prostate cancer diagnosis, one (2%) patient developed metastatic disease. In all, 65 (59%) patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer subsequent to organ transplantation. Management included AS (29%), RT (45%), and RP (15%). During a median (IQR) follow-up of 5.3 (1-8.4) years, three patients (5%) developed metastatic disease. There were no deaths from prostate cancer.

CONCLUSION

A diagnosis of localised prostate cancer should not preclude solid organ transplantation, and the presence of a transplant does not appear to substantially impact risk of prostate cancer progression.

The impact of cancer on the risk of death with a functioning graft of Italian kidney transplant recipients

This study assessed the impact of cancer on the risk of death with a functioning graft of kidney transplant (KT) recipients, as compared to corresponding recipients without cancer. A matched cohort study was conducted using data from a cohort of 13 245 individuals who had undergone KT in 17 Italian centers (1997-2017). Cases were defined as subjects diagnosed with any cancer after KT. For each case, two controls matched by gender, age, and year at KT were randomly selected from cohort members who were cancer-free at the time of diagnosis of the index case. Overall, 292 (20.5%) deaths with a functioning graft were recorded among 1425 cases and 238 (8.4%) among 2850 controls. KT recipients with cancer had a greater risk of death with a functioning graft (hazard ratio, HR = 3.31) than their respective controls. This pattern was consistent over a broad range of cancer types, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma (HR = 33.09), lung (HR = 20.51), breast (HR = 8.80), colon-rectum (HR = 3.51), and kidney (HR = 2.38). The survival gap was observed throughout the entire follow-up period, though the effect was more marked within 1 year from cancer diagnosis. These results call for close posttransplant surveillance to detect cancers at earlier stages when treatments are more effective in improving survival.

High Incidence and Early Onset of Urinary Tract Cancers in Patients with BK Polyomavirus Associated Nephropathy

Over-immunosuppressed kidney transplant recipients are susceptible to malignancies and BK polyomavirus (BKPyV)-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN). This study aimed to verify the association between BKPyV infection and urinary tract cancers (UTC). A total of 244 kidney transplant recipients were enrolled at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from June 2000 to February 2020. Biopsy-proven BKPyVAN patients (n = 17) had worse kidney function (eGFR: 26 ± 13.7 vs. 47.8 ± 31.0 mL/min/1.73 m²). The 5-year allograft survival rates for patients with and without BKPyVAN were 67% and 93%, respectively (p = 0.0002), while the 10-year patient survival was not different between the two groups. BKPyVAN patients had a significantly higher incidence of UTC compared to the non-BKPyVAN group (29.4% vs. 6.6%). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the UTC-free survival rate was significantly lower in BKPyVAN patients, and the onset of UTC was significantly shorter in BKPyVAN patients (53.4 vs. 108.9 months). The multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that age (RR = 1.062) and BKVAN (RR = 6.459) were the most significant risk factors for the development of UTC. Our study demonstrates that BKPyVAN patients have greater allograft losses, higher incidence, a lower cancer-free survival rate, and an earlier onset with a higher relative risk of developing UTC compared to non-BKPyVAN patients.